Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Reentrant localization in a quasiperiodic chain with correlated hopping sequences

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that in a one-dimensional chain with a staggered Aubry-André-Harper potential, correlated quasiperiodic hopping following Fibonacci or Bronze Mean sequences makes some localized eigenstates become extended again in a…

desk verdict A genuinely new family of reentrant localization models, supported by consistent numerics, but the thermodynamic-limit claim rests on an under-documented extrapolation that a referee should push on. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02716 v2 pith:DOJDPG66 submitted 2025-06-03 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elphysics.comp-phphysics.data-an

Sourav Karmakar , Sudin Ganguly , Santanu K. Maiti This is my paper
classification cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elphysics.comp-phphysics.data-an PACS 71.23.-k71.30.+h72.15.Rn
keywords reentrantlocalizationquasiperiodicchainAubry-André-HarpermodelFibonaccisequenceBronzeMeancorrelatedhoppingmobilityedgeparticipationratio
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that reentrant localization—the reappearance of extended states after a system has already localized—can be driven purely by correlated quasiperiodic hopping, without dimerization or long-range couplings. The setting is a one-dimensional tight-binding chain whose on-site energies are a staggered Aubry-André-Harper potential and whose nearest-neighbor hoppings follow either a Fibonacci or a Bronze Mean substitution sequence. As the potential strength $\lambda$ grows, the eigenstates first localize, then a subset re-extends inside a finite window (for Fibonacci, roughly $1.55\lesssim\lambda\lesssim2.1$; for Bronze Mean, roughly $0.7\lesssim\lambda\lesssim1.3$), and then localize again at larger $\lambda$. The authors argue the reentrant window survives the thermodynamic limit because $\langle\mathrm{NPR}\rangle$ extrapolates to a finite value, and they attribute the effect to a deliberate correlation: the on-site incommensurability parameter $b$ is set to the asymptotic symbol ratio of the hopping sequence. If the claim is right, it identifies a new minimal route to reentrant localization in quasiperiodic systems with correlated disorder in both diagonal and off-diagonal terms.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the joint modulation: the staggered (alternating-sign) Aubry-André-Harper site potential $\epsilon_i=\lambda\cos(2\pi b i)$ with the incommensurability parameter $b$ fixed to the asymptotic ratio of the number of $t_A$ bonds to $t_B$ bonds in the hopping sequence—$(1+\sqrt{5})/2$ for the Fibonacci substitution $A\to AB$, $B\to A$, and $(3+\sqrt{13})/2$ for the Bronze Mean substitution $A\to AAAB$, $B\to A$. This choice aligns the two quasiperiodic modulations and is what generates the correlated disorder. The argument is carried by eigenstate diagnostics: the fractal dimension $D_n=-\lim_{N\to\infty}\log(\mathrm{IPR}_n)/\log N$, the averaged inverse and normalized participation ratios $\langle\mathrm{IPR}\rangle$ and $\langle\mathrm{NPR}\rangle$, and the mixed-phase indicator $\eta=\log_{10}[\langle\mathrm{IPR}\rangle\langle\mathrm{NPR}\rangle]$, whose finite values in intermediate windows mark the reentrant phase.

What would settle it

A decisive check is to repeat the Fibonacci-hopping calculation with a generic irrational b, such as $b=1/\sqrt{2}$, keeping all other parameters fixed: the paper's mechanism predicts monotonic localization with no reentrant $\langle\mathrm{NPR}\rangle$ bump, so any surviving RL window at generic $b$ would falsify the correlation picture. A complementary experimental test would be a photonic waveguide array with Fibonacci-ordered couplings and staggered AAH site energies tuned to the golden-mean frequency, where the claim predicts re-extended transport near $\lambda\approx1.8$ between localized regimes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a two-step localization-delocalization-localization transition in a one-dimensional tight-binding model with a staggered Aubry-André-Harper on-site potential and hopping that alternates according to Fibonacci or Bronze Mean substitution rules. As $\lambda$ increases from zero, the eigenstates go from extended to localized, then a subset re-extends in a finite window, and finally localizes again; the reentrant window persists as $N\to\infty$, with the extrapolated $\langle\mathrm{NPR}\rangle$ staying finite inside the window and vanishing outside it. The mechanism is the correlation between diagonal and off-diagonal quasiperiodicities: choosing $b=(1+\sqrt{5})/2$ for Fibonacci hopping and $b=(3+\sqrt{13})/2$ for Bronze Mean hopping aligns the on-site potential with the asymptotic ratio of the hopping sequence, allowing constructive interference that re-extends a fraction of states at intermediate $\lambda$. The paper also maps the mixed-phase indicator $\eta=\log_{10}[\langle\mathrm{IPR}\rangle\langle\mathrm{NPR}\rangle]$ over the $t_B/t_A$–$\lambda$ plane, showing that RL occupies a finite hopping-ratio band, that the Bronze Mean case has extra mixed-phase islands and multiple RL transitions, and that generic irrational $b$ destroys the effect.

Load-bearing premise

The reentrant effect depends entirely on setting the on-site potential's frequency equal to the hopping sequence's asymptotic symbol ratio; if that matching is an ad hoc tuning rather than a legitimate physical condition, localization becomes monotonic and the central claim loses its force.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The reentrant extended phase is not a finite-size artefact: extrapolated $\langle\mathrm{NPR}\rangle$ stays finite as $N\to\infty$ inside the RL windows.
  • The two-step localization-delocalization-localization transition is bounded by two distinct single-particle mobility edges, so extended, localized, and critical states coexist in the spectrum at the same $\lambda$.
  • Matching the on-site frequency to the hopping sequence's inflation ratio is necessary: generic irrational $b$ removes RL, while inverses and doubles of the matching ratios also produce it.
  • In the $t_B/t_A$–$\lambda$ plane, RL occupies a finite hopping-ratio band (about 2.3–3.0 for $t_B/t_A$), and the Bronze Mean sequence additionally shows an isolated mixed-phase island and multiple RL transitions near $t_B/t_A\approx2.8$.
  • Correlated quasiperiodic hopping alone, without dimerization or long-range hopping, suffices to produce RL when combined with the staggered AAH potential.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the paper's $\eta$-maps imply the RL window should be tunable through $t_B/t_A$; shifting the hopping ratio should move the two bounding mobility edges in a predictable way, which offers a direct experimental knob that the paper does not discuss.
  • Inference: the matching condition suggests a broader search strategy—any substitution sequence whose inflation ratio is a quadratic irrational could be paired with an AAH potential at that frequency; only Fibonacci, Bronze Mean, and a few others were tested here.
  • Inference: because the model is strictly non-interacting and single-particle, the fate of the reentrant window under weak interactions or periodic driving is an open question that the paper does not address.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a one-dimensional tight-binding chain with a staggered Aubry-André-Harper (AAH) on-site potential and off-diagonal hopping amplitudes arranged in Fibonacci or Bronze Mean (BM) quasiperiodic sequences. The authors compute eigenstate fractal dimensions, inverse participation ratio (IPR), normalized participation ratio (NPR), and a mixed-phase indicator η to argue that, as the quasiperiodic modulation strength λ increases, the system exhibits a reentrant localization (RL) transition: after an initial localization, a subset of states becomes delocalized again within a finite λ window, before final localization sets in. They report RL windows for Fibonacci (λ ≈ 1.55–2.1) and BM (λ ≈ 0.7–1.3) at t_A=1, t_B=2.5, and claim that finite-size scaling of ⟨NPR⟩ supports persistence of the RL phase in the thermodynamic limit. They also map η in the t_B/t_A–λ plane and find extended mixed-phase regions, multiple RL transitions for BM, and sensitivity of the effect to the incommensurability parameter b, which they set to the asymptotic ratio of the hopping sequence. The paper concludes that correlated quasiperiodic hopping provides a new minimal route to RL.

Significance. If substantiated, the paper extends the phenomenology of reentrant localization to models where both diagonal and off-diagonal modulations are quasiperiodic, without explicit dimerization or long-range hopping. The multi-pronged numerical approach (fractal dimension, IPR/NPR, phase maps) is a strength, and the explicit statement that generic b values destroy RL is an honest test of the mechanism. The model is simple and potentially realizable in photonic or cold-atom settings. However, the central thermodynamic-limit claim currently rests on an under-specified extrapolation and a post hoc selection of averaging windows, which limits the force of the conclusions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 4] The thermodynamic limit extrapolation that underlies the central claim (⟨NPR⟩ remains finite in the RL windows) is not described. The text says 'we further extrapolate ⟨NPR⟩ in the thermodynamic limit' but gives no functional form, number of points used in the fit, error bars, or goodness-of-fit. For the BM sequence only three system sizes (N=1550, 5117, 16898) are shown, which is insufficient to distinguish a genuinely finite asymptotic value from a slow decay such as c N^{-α} or c/log N. Please specify the extrapolation procedure, show the fitted curves, and test alternative decay forms with a quantitative comparison. Without this, the assertion that the RL phase survives the N→∞ limit is not supported.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 3 and Eq. (4)] The averaging windows for ⟨IPR⟩ and ⟨NPR⟩ (28%–72% of states for Fibonacci, 41%–59% for BM) are chosen after identifying the RL regions in the fractal-dimension plots, as explicitly stated in the text. This post hoc selection conditions the averaged quantities on the phenomenon to be demonstrated. To make the RL claim robust, the authors should show that the non-monotonic behavior of ⟨NPR⟩ persists across a range of reasonable energy windows, or derive the window from an independent criterion (e.g., mobility-edge positions). They should also verify that the fraction of states in the chosen window does not shrink with system size, since a shrinking fraction would undermine the thermodynamic-limit interpretation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 4] The N→∞ curves in Fig. 4 are drawn as smooth lines without markers or error bars; please indicate how these were obtained and include confidence intervals if possible. For the BM case, the three system sizes span a relatively narrow range, and adding intermediate or larger sizes would strengthen the scaling analysis.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (5)] Equation (5) defines the fractal dimension via a limit N→∞, while the paper computes D_n at finite N. The text states this method 'does not require extrapolation', but a finite-size estimate of D_n is not the same as the limit. Please clarify that D_n shown in Fig. 2 is a finite-size estimate, or provide a scaling analysis for D_n.
  3. [Section III, paragraph on b dependence] The paragraph justifying b = (1+√5)/2 and b = (3+√13)/2 is helpful, but the statement that RL also occurs for the inverses and twice these values is qualitative. A quantitative statement about the range of b values that support RL (e.g., a plot or a bound) would clarify whether the effect is a fine-tuned resonance or a broader phenomenon.
  4. [Section III, closing paragraph] The claim that 'a universal feature across all known RL studies' is the presence of a staggered quasiperiodic on-site potential is a strong generalization based on limited cases; please soften or provide a more systematic survey.
  5. [General] The paper states that other substitutional sequences (Thue-Morse, Copper mean) were tested but results are omitted because no RL was observed. Including a brief summary of these null results (or at least the parameter range explored) would improve reproducibility and transparency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the model's b choice and averaging windows are open, stated choices; the central RL claim rests on direct numerical diagnostics, not on an input fitted as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (RL induced by the interplay of a staggered AAH potential and Fibonacci/BM correlated hopping) is obtained by direct numerical diagonalization and three independent diagnostics: fractal-dimension density plots, IPR/NPR curves, and spatial wavefunction profiles. The two potentially circularity-adjacent choices are (i) setting the incommensurability parameter b equal to the asymptotic t_A/t_B ratio of the hopping sequence and (ii) averaging IPR/NPR over energy windows that contain the RL regions. Both choices are explicitly stated rather than hidden. The paper tests generic irrational b values and reports monotonic localization without RL, and it explains that the averaging subset is centered on the energy windows where RL appears. Those choices condition the demonstration, but they do not make the output equal to the input by construction: the RL windows and finite NPR values are read off from the same numerical data, which weakens the independence of the confirmation but is an evidence-quality concern, not a definitional reduction. The only self-citation (Ref. [36], 'Our recent study') is contextual and not load-bearing. The extrapolation to N→∞ is reported without an explicit fit form, so no equation or procedure is given that would allow one to show that the claimed finite intercept is a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The paper also openly flags omitted negative results for Thue-Morse and Copper Mean sequences ('The corresponding results are therefore omitted for clarity and conciseness'), which is an honesty statement rather than a circular step. Under the hard rule requiring a quotable reduction for any circularity finding, no such reduction is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities beyond the model parameters; the paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities.

free parameters (4)
  • b (incommensurability parameter) = golden mean (1+sqrt(5))/2 for Fibonacci; (3+sqrt(13))/2 for Bronze Mean
    Set to the asymptotic t_A/t_B ratio of the hopping sequence. The paper states RL does not occur for generic irrational b, so this choice is load-bearing.
  • t_B/t_A ratio = 2.5
    Fixed at 2.5 for the main results; parameter-space exploration shows the RL window spans 2.3 to 3.0. Not fitted to data but hand-picked.
  • Averaged energy window = Fibonacci: central 44% (28-72%); Bronze Mean: central 18% (41-59%)
    Chosen post hoc from Fig. 2 to highlight the RL regions. Affects all reported averaged IPR and NPR values.
  • AAH phase phi = 0
    Set to 0; authors claim no qualitative effect, but this is a gauge-like choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Tight-binding Hamiltonian with open boundary conditions is an adequate description
    The model in Eq. (1) is taken as the physical system; no justification for neglecting interactions or other degrees of freedom.
  • domain assumption Fibonacci and Bronze Mean substitution rules generate physically meaningful hopping sequences
    Hopping integrals follow A->AB, B->A (Fibonacci) and A->AAAB, B->A (Bronze Mean); these are standard but chosen for study.
  • ad hoc to paper b is the asymptotic ratio of t_A to t_B building blocks
    This correlated choice of b is essential for RL; the paper admits generic b leads to monotonic localization.
  • standard math IPR, NPR and fractal dimension D reliably distinguish extended, localized and critical states
    Standard measures, but D is computed from finite-size scaling without error analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reentrant localization in a quasiperiodic chain with correlated hopping sequences." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DOJDPG66

@misc{pith2026250602716,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reentrant localization in a quasiperiodic chain with correlated hopping sequences},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DOJDPG66}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02716}
}
read the original abstract

Quasiperiodic systems are known to exhibit localization transitions in low dimensions, wherein all electronic states become localized beyond a critical disorder strength. Interestingly, recent studies have uncovered a reentrant localization (RL) phenomenon: upon further increasing the quasiperiodic modulation strength beyond the localization threshold, a subset of previously localized states can become delocalized again within a specific parameter window. While RL transitions have been primarily explored in systems with simple periodic modulations, such as dimerized or long-range hopping integrals, the impact of more intricate or correlated hopping structures on RL behavior remains largely elusive. In this work, we investigate the localization behavior in a one-dimensional lattice featuring staggered, correlated on-site potentials following the Aubry-Andr\'{e}-Harper model, along with off-diagonal hopping modulations structured according to quasiperiodic Fibonacci and Bronze Mean sequences. By systematically analyzing the fractal dimension, inverse participation ratio, and normalized participation ratio, we demonstrate the occurrence of RL transitions induced purely by the interplay between quasiperiodic on-site disorder and correlated hopping. We further examine the parameter space to determine the specific regimes that give rise to RL. Our findings highlight the crucial role of underlying structural correlations in governing localization-delocalization transitions in low-dimensional quasiperiodic systems, where the correlated disorder manifests in both diagonal and off-diagonal terms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02716 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online). Quasiperiodic chains with (a) Fi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online). Density plots of the fractal dimensi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (Color online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online). Density plots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958)

    work page 1958

  2. [2]

    Owing to this incommensurability, the spectrum fragments into a fractal set of bands and gaps [ 47, 48]. To provide clearer insight into the localization be- havior of the states, we further present density plots of Dn as functions of the eigenstate index and modu- lation strength λ for the Fibonacci and BM sequences in Figs. 2(c) and (d), respectively. F...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The averaging for ⟨IPR⟩ and 4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 FIG. 2. (Color online). Density plots of the fractal dimensi on Dn. (a), (b) Energy spectrum as a function of modulation strengthλ for the Fibonacci and BM sequences, respectively. (c), (d) Density plots of the fractal dimension Dn for indi- vidual eigenstates as functions of the eigenstate index and modulat...

    work page

  4. [4]

    It is important to note that, in the RL region, only a certain fraction of states become delocalized

    Such choices of subsets ensure a more accurate and representative characterization of the local- ization properties in the system and have been consis- tently adopted throughout the paper. It is important to note that, in the RL region, only a certain fraction of states become delocalized. Therefore, if the entire set of eigenstates were considered, ident...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The averaging procedure is identical to that described in Fig. 3. The system sizes considered for the Fibonacci sequence are N = 1598, 2585, 4182, 6766, 10947, and 17712, and for the BM sequence as N = 1550, 5117, and 16898. All other physical parameters, such as the hopping amplitudes tA and tB, as well as the on-site potentials, are the same as in Fig

    work page

  6. [6]

    Based on the computed data, we further extrapolate ⟨NPR⟩ in the thermodynamic limit, N → ∞ . Remarkably, ⟨NPR⟩ remains finite for both sequences within the reentrant region, indicating the persistence of the RL phase as the system size increases and approaches the thermodynamic limit. This finite value of ⟨NPR⟩ confirms the robustness of the RL phase against...

    work page

  7. [7]

    The averaging scheme is the same as mentioned in Fig. 3. To gain spatial insight into individual states, we ex- amine local probability distributions |ψi n|2 (n being the eigenstate index and i the site index) across different regimes, as shown in Fig. 5. The left and right panels of Fig. 5 depict the local probability distribution for the Fibonacci and BM...

    work page

  8. [8]

    5(a) and (b) for the Fi- bonacci and BM sequences, respectively

    At λ = 0, the states are clearly extended as the probability amplitudes are very low across the entire chain as shown in Figs. 5(a) and (b) for the Fi- bonacci and BM sequences, respectively. At λ = 1.2 for the Fibonacci chain, the wave function is sharply peaked (Fig. 5(c)) around a single site, confirming Anderson- like localization driven by the incomme...

    work page

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    The averaging scheme for ⟨IPR⟩ and ⟨NPR⟩ used to compute η is the same as described in Fig. 3. Figures 6(a) and (b) present the density plots of η in thetB/tA −λ plane for the Fibonacci and BM sequences, respectively. The system sizes and all other physical pa- rameters are id...

  2. [10]

    P. A. Lee and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Disordered electronic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 287 (1985)

    1985

  3. [11]

    Abrahams, 50 years of Anderson Localization , vol

    E. Abrahams, 50 years of Anderson Localization , vol. 24 (World Scientific, 2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions , Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008). 8

    2008

  5. [13]

    Abrahams, P

    E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Scaling theory of localization: Absence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673 (1979)

    1979

  6. [14]

    Mott, The mobility edge since 1967 , J

    N. Mott, The mobility edge since 1967 , J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 20, 3075 (1987)

    1987

  7. [15]

    R. S. Whitney, Most efficient quantum thermoelectric at finite power output , Phys. Rev. lett. 112, 130601 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    Yamamoto, A

    K. Yamamoto, A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, and N. Hatano, Thermoelectricity near Anderson localization transitions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 155201 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Chiaracane, M

    C. Chiaracane, M. T. Mitchison, A. Purkayastha, G. Haack, and J. Goold, Quasiperiodic quantum heat en- gines with a mobility edge , Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013093 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Segev, Y

    M. Segev, Y. Silberberg, and D. N. Christodoulides, An- derson localization of light , Nat. Photonics 7, 197 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    Shapiro, Cold atoms in the presence of disorder , J

    B. Shapiro, Cold atoms in the presence of disorder , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 143001 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr´ e, Analyticity breaking and Ander- son localization in incommensurate lattices , Ann. Israel Phys. Soc 3, 18 (1980)

    1980

  13. [21]

    P. G. Harper, The general motion of conduction electrons in a uniform magnetic field, with application to the dia- magnetism of metals , Proc. Phys. Soc. A 68, 874 (1955)

    1955

  14. [22]

    S. Y. Jitomirskaya, Metal-insulator transition for the al- most Mathieu operator , Ann. of Math. 150, 1159 (1999)

    1999

  15. [23]

    Aulbach, A

    C. Aulbach, A. Wobst, G.-L. Ingold, P. H¨ anggi, and I. Varga, Phase-space visualization of a metal–insulator transition, New J. Phys. 6, 70 (2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    Kohmoto, L

    M. Kohmoto, L. P. Kadanoff, and C. Tang, Localization problem in one dimension: Mapping and escape , Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1870 (1983)

    1983

  17. [25]

    Ostlund, R

    S. Ostlund, R. Pandit, D. Rand, H. J. Schellnhuber, and E. D. Siggia, One-dimensional Schr¨ odinger equation with an almost periodic potential , Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1873 (1983)

    1983

  18. [26]

    Kohmoto and Y

    M. Kohmoto and Y. Oono, Cantor spectrum for an almost periodic Schr¨ odinger equation and a dynamical map, Phys. Lett. A 102, 145 (1984)

    1984

  19. [27]

    Kohmoto, B

    M. Kohmoto, B. Sutherland, and C. Tang, Critical wave functions and a Cantor-set spectrum of a one- dimensional quasicrystal model , Phys. Rev. B 35, 1020 (1987)

    1987

  20. [28]

    Jagannathan, The Fibonacci quasicrystal: Case study of hidden dimensions and multifractality , Rev

    A. Jagannathan, The Fibonacci quasicrystal: Case study of hidden dimensions and multifractality , Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045001 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    J.-B. Suck, M. Schreiber, and P. H¨ aussler, Quasicryst als: An introduction to structure, physical properties and ap- plications, vol. 55 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Roche, G

    S. Roche, G. Trambly de Laissardi´ ere, and D. Mayou, Electronic transport properties of quasicrystals , J. Math. Phys. 38, 1794 (1997)

    1997

  23. [31]

    Dal Negro, C

    L. Dal Negro, C. J. Oton, Z. Gaburro, L. Pavesi, P. Johnson, A. Lagendijk, R. Righini, M. Colocci, and D. S. Wiersma, Light transport through the band-edge states of Fibonacci quasicrystals , Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 055501 (2003)

    2003

  24. [32]

    Mac´ e, A

    N. Mac´ e, A. Jagannathan, and F. Pi´ echon, Fractal di- mensions of wave functions and local spectral measures on the Fibonacci chain , Phys. Rev. B 93, 205153 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Y. E. Kraus and O. Zilberberg, Topological equivalence between the Fibonacci quasicrystal and the Harper model , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 116404 (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    Hiramoto and M

    H. Hiramoto and M. Kohmoto, New localization in a quasiperiodic system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2714 (1989)

    1989

  27. [35]

    Goblot, A

    V. Goblot, A. ˇStrkalj, N. Pernet, J. L. Lado, C. Dorow, A. Lema ˆ ıtre, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, I. Sagnes, S. Ravets, et al., Emergence of criticality through a cascade of delocalization transitions in quasiperiodic chains , Nat. Phys. 16, 832 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Zhai, G.-Y

    L.-J. Zhai, G.-Y. Huang, and S. Yin, Cascade of the de- localization transition in a non-Hermitian interpolating Aubry-Andr´ e-Fibonacci chain, Phys. Rev. B 104, 014202 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    S. Roy, T. Mishra, B. Tanatar, and S. Basu, Reentrant lo- calization transition in a quasiperiodic chain , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 106803 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    C. Wu, J. Fan, G. Chen and S. Jia, Non-Hermiticity- induced reentrant localization in a quasiperiodic lattice , New J. Phys. 23, 123048 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Jiang, Y

    X.-P. Jiang, Y. Qiao and J.-P. Cao, Mobility edges and reentrant localization in one-dimensional dimerized non- Hermitian quasiperiodic lattice, Chin. Phys. B 30, 097202 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Zuo and D

    Z.-W. Zuo and D. Kang, Reentrant localization tran- sition in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with random- dimer disorder , Phys. Rev. A 106, 013305 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Padhan, M

    A. Padhan, M. K. Giri, S. Mondal and T. Mishra, Emergence of multiple localization transitions in a one- dimensional quasiperiodic lattice , Phys. Rev. B 105, L220201 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    H. Wang, X. Zheng, J. Chen, L. Xiao, S. Jia and L. Zhang, Fate of the reentrant localization phenomenon in the one-dimensional dimerized quasiperiodic chain with long-rangehopping, Phys. Rev. B 107, 075128 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Li and Z

    S.-Z. Li and Z. Li, The multiple re-entrant localization in a phase-shift quasiperiodic chain , (arXiv preprint) doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.12321

    doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Ganguly, S

    S. Ganguly, S. Chattopadhyay, K. Mondal, and S. K. Maiti, Critical analysis of multiple reentrant localiza- tion in an antiferromagnetic helix with transverse electri c field: Hopping dimerization-free scenario , SciPost Phys. Core 8, 012 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Aditya, K

    S. Aditya, K. Sengupta and D. Sen, Periodically driven model with quasiperiodic potential and staggered hopping amplitudes: Engineering of mobility gaps and multifractal states, Phys. Rev. B 107, 035402 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Tabanelli, C

    H. Tabanelli, C. Castelnovo, and A. ˇStrkalj, Reentrant localisation transitions and anomalous spectral properti es in off-diagonal quasiperiodic systems , Phys. Rev. B 110, 184208 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    E. L. Albuquerque and M. G. Cottam, Theory of elemen- tary excitations in quasiperiodic structures , Phys. Rep. 376, 225 (2003)

    2003

  40. [48]

    MacI´ a,The role of aperiodic order in science and tech- nology, Rep

    E. MacI´ a,The role of aperiodic order in science and tech- nology, Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 397 (2005)

    2005

  41. [49]

    Guo, Long-range correlation and charge transfer efficiency in substitutional sequences of DNA molecules , Phys

    A.-M. Guo, Long-range correlation and charge transfer efficiency in substitutional sequences of DNA molecules , Phys. Rev. E 75, 061915 (2007)

    2007

  42. [50]

    X. Li, X. Li, and S. Das Sarma, Mobility edges in one-dimensional bichromatic incommensurate potentials , Phys. Rev. B 96, 085119 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Li and S

    X. Li and S. Das Sarma, Mobility edge and intermediate phase in one-dimensional incommensurate lattice poten- tials, Phys. Rev. B 101, 064203 (2020). 9

    2020

  44. [52]

    X. Deng, S. Ray, S. Sinha, G. Shlyapnikov, and L. Santos, One-dimensional quasicrystals with power-law hopping , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 025301 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    H. Yao, A. Khoudli, L. Bresque, and L. Sanchez- Palencia, Critical behavior and fractality in shallow one- dimensional quasiperiodic potentials , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070405 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Roy and A

    N. Roy and A. Sharma, Fraction of delocalized eigenstates in the long-range Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper model, Phys. Rev. B 103, 075124 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    D. R. Hofstadter, Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields , Phys. Rev. B 14, 2239 (1976)

    1976

  48. [56]

    Y. E. Kraus, Y. Lahini, Z. Ringel, M. Verbin, and O. Zilberberg, Topological States and Adiabatic Pumping in Quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 106402 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    Lahini, R

    Y. Lahini, R. Pugatch, F. Pozzi, M. Sorel, R. Moran- dotti, N. Davidson, and Y. Silberberg, Observation of a localization transition in quasiperiodic photonic lattic es, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 013901 (2009)

    2009

  50. [58]

    P. Wang, Y. Zheng, X. Chen, C. Huang, Y. V. Kartashov, L. Torner, V. V. Konotop, and F. Ye, Localization and delocalization of light in photonic moir´ e lattices , Nature 577, 42 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M . Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose–Einstein condensate, Nature 453, 895 (2008)

    2008

  52. [60]

    D. N. Christodoulides, F. Lederer, and Y. Silber- berg, Discretizing light behaviour in linear and nonlinear waveguide lattices, Nature 424, 817 (2003)

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.