Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Subdiffusion from competition between multi-exponential friction memory and energy barriers

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For a generalized Langevin equation with a multi-exponential friction memory whose time scales and amplitudes are exponentially spaced, the intermediate mean squared displacement scales as $t^{\alpha}$ with $\alpha=\ln(c/d)/\ln(c)$, and…

desk verdict A clean, useful analytic result for subdiffusion from multi-exponential memory kernels; the headline exponent formula is slightly overclaimed as exact but holds up numerically, so it deserves a serious referee with a request to tighten the approximation claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03036 v1 pith:5CLGEFYW submitted 2025-06-03 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-ph

Anton Klimek , Benjamin A. Dalton , Roland R. Netz This is my paper
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-ph MSC 82C31 PACS 05.40.-a05.40.Jc
keywords subdiffusiongeneralizedLangevinequationmulti-exponentialmemorykernelmeansquareddisplacementenergybarrierpersistencetimefrictionproteinfoldingdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks why so many complex systems move subdiffusively, with a mean squared displacement growing slower than linearly in time, and whether the cause is the memory of the surrounding friction or the energy barriers in the potential landscape. It analyzes a generalized Langevin equation whose friction memory is a sum of exponentials with exponentially spaced time scales and amplitudes, the memory spectrum observed in simulations of fast-folding proteins. The central claim is that for such a kernel the intermediate-time mean squared displacement scales as $C_{\mathrm{MSD}}(t)\propto t^{\alpha}$ with $\alpha=\ln(c/d)/\ln(c)$, where $c$ is the spacing of memory times and $d$ the spacing of friction amplitudes, valid for $c>d$ and for times between the shortest and longest memory times. Together with the threshold $U_0\lesssim 2\,k_BT$, the paper concludes that memory, not the energy landscape, controls the overdamped MSD up to the global relaxation time. If correct, this makes subdiffusion exponents predictable from friction-memory ratios alone in a broad class of viscoelastic and biophysical systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the geometrically spaced multi-exponential kernel of Eqs. (4) and (5), whose time scales $\tau_i$ and amplitudes $\gamma_i$ grow as powers $c^{i-1}$ and $d^{i-1}$. Because the kernel values at geometrically spaced times form a nearly geometric series when $c>d$, its logarithmic derivative is constant, giving $\Gamma(t)\propto t^{-\alpha}$ with $\alpha=\ln(c/d)/\ln(c)$ over the window $\tau_1<t<\tau_n$; a known power-law-friction result then converts this into $C_{\mathrm{MSD}}(t)\propto t^{\alpha}$. Two derived timescales carry the argument: the persistence time $\tau_p=1/G(\tau_p)$, which marks the end of ballistic motion, and the memory-corrected local and global relaxation times $\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}^{\mathrm{loc}*}=G(\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}^{\mathrm{loc}*})/K_{\mathrm{loc}}$ and $\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}^{\mathrm{glob}*}=G(\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}^{\mathrm{glob}*})/K_{\mathrm{glob}}$, which separate memory-dominated from barrier-dominated regimes. Exact MSD expressions for free diffusion and harmonic confinement, obtained by contour integration of the response function, supply the reference curves that the simulation tests measure against.

What would settle it

Take a three-exponential kernel with $\tau_1=\tau_m$, $c=100$, $d=5$, and no external potential; compute the exact MSD from Eq. (10) and measure the mean $\alpha(t)$ between $\tau_1$ and $\tau_n$. If the plateau value differs from $\ln(20)/\ln(100)\approx 0.651$ by more than the oscillation amplitude, or if the same test fails for $n=9$, the exponent formula is contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the logarithmic slope of a multi-exponential friction kernel with geometric parameter scaling fixes the subdiffusion exponent, and this exponent survives in the presence of modest energy barriers. Starting from $\Gamma(t)=\sum_i (\gamma_i/\tau_i)e^{-t/\tau_i}$ with $\tau_i=\tau_1 c^{i-1}$ and $\gamma_i=\gamma_1 d^{i-1}$, the authors derive $\alpha=\ln(c/d)/\ln(c)$ for $c>d$ over the window $\tau_1<t<\tau_n$, and verify it against exact MSD formulas for free and harmonically confined motion and against simulations in a double-well potential. They further show that memory prolongs the ballistic regime: its end is set by the persistence time $\tau_p=1/G(\tau_p)$, which exceeds the Markovian inertial time whenever long memory components are present. For barrier heights $U_0\lesssim 2\,B$, the MSD matches the memory-only prediction until the memory-corrected global relaxation time $\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}^{\mathrm{glob}*}=G(\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}^{\mathrm{glob}*})/K_{\mathrm{glob}}$, and the same exponent formula describes short-time motion even for taller barriers.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the power-law relation "friction kernel $\Gamma(t)\propto t^{-\alpha}$ gives MSD $\propto t^{\alpha}$" still holds for a finite sum of exponentials that only mimics a power law over a finite window; this is checked by simulation for selected parameters, not proven for arbitrary finite $n$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any multi-exponential GLE with $c>d>1$ and enough memory components, the intermediate MSD exponent is fixed by $\ln(c/d)/\ln(c)$ alone, independent of the overall friction scale.
  • Memory systematically prolongs the ballistic regime; the persistence time $\tau_p=1/G(\tau_p)$ replaces the Markovian inertial time as the boundary between ballistic and subdiffusive motion.
  • In strongly damped systems with barriers up to about $2\,k_BT$, the MSD is indistinguishable from the memory-only prediction until $\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}^{\mathrm{glob}*}$, so measured subdiffusion in this regime is a memory effect, not a barrier effect.
  • For taller barriers, barrier-induced subdiffusion appears only after $\tau_{\mathrm{rel}}^{\mathrm{loc}*}$, and the short-time exponent is still set by Eq. (6); above this time, memory and barrier effects combine.
  • Fitting an experimental MSD with Eq. (6) gives estimates of the memory-time ratio $c$ and amplitude ratio $d$, including components with time scales below the temporal resolution of the data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The exponent rule should generalize to any memory kernel whose log-log slope is nearly constant over a window; the geometric multi-exponential family is the concrete case where that slope is set by the ratios $c$ and $d$.
  • A finite exponential sum always crosses over to normal diffusion at $t\gtrsim\tau_n$, so the same data that show a subdiffusive plateau should show a late-time return to $\alpha=1$; locating that crossover reveals the longest memory time even when it is not directly resolved.
  • Because memory-corrected relaxation times are shorter than Markovian ones for any monotonically decaying kernel, confinement or barrier effects in viscoelastic media should be delayed relative to Markovian predictions with equal total friction, a timing shift single-particle tracking could measure.
  • The $U_0\approx 2B$ threshold is not a universal constant; it should depend on well curvature, barrier distance, and damping, so systematic scans of double-well parameters could map when landscape effects begin to appear in the MSD.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a generalized Langevin equation with a multi-exponential friction memory kernel whose time constants and amplitudes are exponentially spaced (Eqs. 4 and 5). It claims that the intermediate-time mean squared displacement (MSD) scales as t^α with α = ln(c/d)/ln(c) (Eq. 6), and that for barrier heights up to about 2 kBT the dynamics are dominated by memory rather than by the energy landscape. The authors derive exact analytic MSD expressions for free diffusion and harmonic confinement (SI Sec. II), validate the exponent formula by fits and comparisons with simulated MSDs, and perform double-well simulations to disentangle memory and barrier effects.

Significance. If the central formula holds, the paper provides a simple and practically useful connection between the parameters of a multi-exponential memory kernel and the observed subdiffusion exponent, with direct implications for protein folding and viscoelastic transport. The exact analytic MSD formulas for multi-exponential kernels in harmonic potentials are a useful technical contribution, and the comparison framework separating memory- and barrier-induced subdiffusion is timely. The paper also provides open-source simulation code, which strengthens reproducibility. However, the main analytical result is derived only at the level of the kernel's local logarithmic slope, and its transfer to the MSD is validated numerically rather than proven for finite n, so the strength of the central claim is currently bounded by the unquantified finite-n error.

major comments (3)
  1. [SI Sec. I (Eqs. S6–S8) and main text Eq. (6)] The derivation of Eq. (6) computes the logarithmic slope of the friction kernel Γ(t) at discrete times t_i and then invokes Ref. [53] to conclude that the MSD scales with the same exponent. Ref. [53] applies to an exact power-law kernel, whereas the finite sum of exponentials in Eq. (4) is only approximately a power law over the window τ_1 < t < τ_n. No bound is given on the deviation of the MSD exponent from Eq. (6) as a function of n, c, and d. Because Eq. (6) is the paper's central analytical claim, please either prove an error estimate for the MSD exponent or explicitly state and quantify the approximate nature of Eq. (6) for finite n.
  2. [Main text after Eq. (6) and Fig. 6] The validity condition for Eq. (6) is stated as c ≫ d > 1, but the simulations in Fig. 6 use c=100, d=20, for which c/d = 5, and n=3. The finite-n correction in Eq. (S6) is not negligible in this regime because n=3 does not satisfy n ≫ i. The authors should either use parameter sets that satisfy the stated validity condition for the key figures, or demonstrate quantitatively that Eq. (6) still describes the MSD exponent for these parameters.
  3. [Introduction, Eq. (6)] The text states that an 'exact expression' for the scaling exponent is derived. In view of the approximations in SI Sec. I (c ≫ d, n ≫ i, and the finite-kernel transfer step), this overstates the mathematical status of Eq. (6). Please rephrase to describe the result as an approximate but accurate expression under the stated conditions.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Main text, Eq. (10)] The typesetting of the MSD formula in Eq. (10) is garbled; it should be rendered cleanly or point the reader to the corresponding SI equation (S22) for a readable form.
  2. [Main text, Fig. 6 caption] The horizontal lines labeled 'predicted α' use Eq. (6) for parameter sets outside the stated validity range; the caption should note that this is an extrapolation.
  3. [SI Sec. III] The section title contains a typo: 'Subfiffusion' should be 'Subdiffusion'.
  4. [References] Ref. [52] contains a stray '/suppress' in the author list; please correct this reference.
  5. [Main text, Sec. 3.1] The text describing oscillations in α(t) would benefit from an explicit statement that these oscillations reflect the individual exponential components of the memory kernel, rather than any potential effects.
  6. [SI Sec. I] The derivation would be clearer if the authors explicitly stated the base of the logarithms in Eqs. (S6)–(S8) and described the time range over which the fits in Fig. S1 were performed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central exponent formula is derived from the kernel parameters and validated by independent simulations, while self-citations are motivational rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Equation (6), alpha = ln(c/d)/ln(c), is obtained in SI Sec. I by taking the discrete logarithmic slope of the multi-exponential kernel Eq. (4) with exponentially spaced times and amplitudes (Eq. (5)), as shown in Eqs. (S1)-(S7), and then applying the external, independently established Burov-Barkai result [53] that a power-law kernel Gamma(t) proportional to t^{-alpha} produces MSD proportional to t^alpha for alpha < 1. The exponent is computed from the input parameters c and d alone; no MSD data are used to fit alpha, and the comparisons with the analytic MSD expression Eq. (10) and with GLE simulations (Figs. 2 and 6) are forward checks rather than fitted-input predictions. Citations to the authors' earlier protein-folding work (Refs. 41-43) motivate the multi-exponential ansatz and the relevance of the U0 <= 2B regime, but they are not load-bearing for the derivation; the barrier-height claim is also tested directly by double-well GLE simulations in Fig. 6. The finite-n and c >> d validity gap noted in the review (the simplification from Eq. (S6) to Eq. (S7) requires n >> i, while the n = 3 simulations use c = 100 with d = 5 or 20) is a quantitative-accuracy/correctness concern about an approximation, not a circular reduction: the paper never fits the MSD exponent and then renames that fit as the prediction. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the multi-exponential kernel and double-well potential are standard modeling choices. The free parameters listed are the model inputs on which the central formula and the simulation conclusions depend. The key imported assumptions are the approximate fluctuation-dissipation relation for non-harmonic potentials and the kernel-to-MSD exponent transfer.

free parameters (4)
  • c (memory-time ratio) = c=100 in Fig. 6; varied elsewhere
    Exponential spacing of memory times is an assumption; the predicted exponent α depends on c.
  • d (friction-amplitude ratio) = d=5 and 20 in Fig. 6; varied elsewhere
    Exponential spacing of amplitudes is an assumption; the predicted exponent α depends on d.
  • n (number of exponential components) = n=3, 5, 9
    The derivation improves with n; finite-n corrections are not captured by Eq. (6).
  • τ1/τm (shortest memory time over inertial time) = τ1/τm=1 in Figs. 2 and 4; τ1/τm=10^3 in Fig. 6
    Sets the onset of the subdiffusive window; chosen by hand in the simulations.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Fluctuation-dissipation relation Eq. (3), exact for harmonic potentials, is assumed to hold for the non-harmonic double-well simulations.
    Stated in the main text as only approximately valid for non-harmonic potentials; the barrier simulations and the memory-versus-barrier comparison depend on it. Main text after Eq. (3) and Sec. 3.4.
  • domain assumption A friction kernel scaling Γ(t)∝t^{-α} implies MSD scaling ∝t^α for α<1.
    Imported from Burov-Barkai Ref. [53]; used in SI Sec. I to convert the logarithmic slope of the discrete multi-exponential kernel into the MSD exponent Eq. (S8).
  • ad hoc to paper Memory times and amplitudes follow the geometric spacing τ_i=τ1 c^{i-1}, γ_i=γ1 d^{i-1}.
    Introduced in Eq. (5) and motivated by protein-folding fits; the central formula Eq. (6) applies only to this parameterization.
  • domain assumption Equilibrium Boltzmann-distributed initial conditions are used in the double-well simulations.
    SI Sec. III states initial conditions are drawn from the Boltzmann distribution; the ensemble MSD interpretation assumes stationary equilibrium dynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Subdiffusion from competition between multi-exponential friction memory and energy barriers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5CLGEFYW

@misc{pith2026250603036,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Subdiffusion from competition between multi-exponential friction memory and energy barriers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5CLGEFYW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03036}
}
abstract

Subdiffusion is a hallmark of complex systems, ranging from protein folding to transport in viscoelastic media. However, despite its pervasiveness, the mechanistic origins of subdiffusion remain contested. Here, we analyze both Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics, in the presence and absence of energy barriers, in order to disentangle the distinct contributions of memory-dependent friction and energy barriers to the emergence of subdiffusive behavior. Focusing on the mean squared displacement (MSD), we develop an analytical framework that connects subdiffusion to multiscale memory effects in the generalized Langevin equation (GLE), and derive the subdiffusive scaling behavior of the MSD for systems governed by multi-exponential memory kernels. We identify persistence and relaxation timescales that delineate dynamical regimes in which subdiffusion arises from either memory or energy barrier effects. By comparing analytical predictions with simulations, we confirm that memory dominates the overdamped dynamics for barrier heights up to approximately $2\,k_BT$, a regime recently shown to be relevant for protein folding. Overall, our results advance the theoretical understanding of anomalous diffusion and provide practical tools that are broadly applicable to fields as diverse as molecular biophysics, polymer physics, and active matter systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hierarchical friction memory leads to subdiffusive configurational dynamics of fast-folding proteins

    cond-mat.soft 2025-06

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [53]

    Burov, S., Barkai, E.: Critical Exponent of the Fractional Langevin Equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(7), 070601 (2008) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.070601 . Pub- lisher: American Physical Society

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.070601 2008

  2. [1]

    The European Physical Journal B 93, 1–22 (2020)

    Jack, R.L.: Ergodicity and large deviations in physical systems with stochastic dynamics. The European Physical Journal B 93, 1–22 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [2]

    Annalen der Physik 324(2), 289–306 (1906) https://doi.org/10

    Einstein, A.: Eine neue Bestimmung der Molek¨ uldimensionen. Annalen der Physik 324(2), 289–306 (1906) https://doi.org/10. 1002/andp.19063240204

    work page 1906

  4. [3]

    Kiefer, H., Furtel, D., Ayaz, C., Klimek, A., Daldrop, J.O., Netz, R.R.: Predictabil- ity Analysis and Prediction of Discrete Weather and Financial Time-Series Data with a Hamiltonian-Based Filter-Projection Approach. arXiv. arXiv:2409.15026 (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.15026 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15026

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.15026 2024

  5. [4]

    Bio- physical Journal 10(10), 980 (1970) https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(70)86347-0

    Gail, M.H., Boone, C.W.: The Locomotion of Mouse Fibroblasts in Tissue Culture. Bio- physical Journal 10(10), 980 (1970) https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(70)86347-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(70)86347-0 1970

  6. [5]

    Physics reports 195(4-5), 127–293 (1990)

    Bouchaud, J.-P., Georges, A.: Anomalous dif- fusion in disordered media: statistical mech- anisms, models and physical applications. Physics reports 195(4-5), 127–293 (1990)

    work page 1990

  7. [6]

    Wiley Online Library, (2008)

    Klages, R., Radons, G., Sokolov, I.M.: Anomalous Transport. Wiley Online Library, (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [7]

    New Journal of Physics 12(6), 063026 (2010)

    Lindner, B.: Diffusion of particles subject to nonlinear friction and a colored noise. New Journal of Physics 12(6), 063026 (2010)

    work page 2010

Show all 58 references
  1. [8]

    Soft Matter 8(35), 9043–9052 (2012)

    Sokolov, I.M.: Models of anomalous diffusion in crowded environments. Soft Matter 8(35), 9043–9052 (2012)

    2012

  2. [9]

    Cambridge University Press, (2011)

    Viswanathan, G.M., Luz, M.G.E.d., Raposo, E.P., Stanley, H.E.: The Physics of Foraging: An Introduction to Random Searches and Biological Encounters. Cambridge University Press, (2011). Google-Books-ID: HmsOhXp- WywoC

    2011

  3. [10]

    Nature Photon 6(12), 834–837 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.278

    Douglass, K.M., Sukhov, S., Dogariu, A.: Superdiffusion in optically controlled active media. Nature Photon 6(12), 834–837 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.278 . Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2012 doi

  4. [11]

    Sci Rep 5(1), 11690 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11690

    Reverey, J.F., Jeon, J.-H., Bao, H., Leippe, M., Metzler, R., Selhuber-Unkel, C.: Superdiffusion dominates intracellu- lar particle motion in the supercrowded cytoplasm of pathogenic Acanthamoeba castellanii. Sci Rep 5(1), 11690 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11690 . Publi...

    2015 doi

  5. [12]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(2), 459–463 (2008) https: //doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707603105

    Dieterich, P., Klages, R., Preuss, R., Schwab, A.: Anomalous dynamics of cell migra- tion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(2), 459–463 (2008) https: //doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707603105 . Pub- lisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    2008 doi

  6. [13]

    PLOS Computa- tional Biology 18(5), 1010089 (2022) https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010089

    Dieterich, P., Lindemann, O., Moskopp, M.L., Tauzin, S., Huttenlocher, A., Klages, R., Chechkin, A., Schwab, A.: Anomalous diffusion and asymmetric tempering memory in neutrophil chemotaxis. PLOS Computa- tional Biology 18(5), 1010089 (2022) https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pc...

    2022 doi

  7. [14]

    Guo, H., Bourret, G., Lennox, R.B., Sut- ton, M., Harden, J.L., Leheny, R.L.: Entanglement-Controlled Subdiffusion of Nanoparticles within Concentrated Poly- mer Solutions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(5), 11 055901 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.109.055901

    2012

  8. [15]

    Abbasi, A., Netz, R.R., Naji, A.: Non- Markovian Modeling of Nonequilibrium Fluctuations and Dissipation in Active Viscoelastic Biomatter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131(22), 228202 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.228202

    2023 doi

  9. [16]

    Berry, H., Chat´ e, H.: Anomalous dif- fusion due to hindering by mobile obstacles undergoing Brownian motion or Orstein-Ulhenbeck processes. Phys. Rev. E 89(2), 022708 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.022708 . Publisher: American Physical Society

    2014 doi

  10. [17]

    Biophysical Journal 87(5), 3518–3524 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104

    Weiss, M., Elsner, M., Kartberg, F., Nils- son, T.: Anomalous Subdiffusion Is a Mea- sure for Cytoplasmic Crowding in Living Cells. Biophysical Journal 87(5), 3518–3524 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104. 044263

    2004 doi

  11. [18]

    The European Physical Journal E 39, 1–13 (2016)

    Hansing, J., Ciemer, C., Kim, W.K., Zhang, X., DeRouchey, J.E., Netz, R.R.: Nanoparti- cle filtering in charged hydrogels: Effects of particle size, charge asymmetry and salt con- centration. The European Physical Journal E 39, 1–13 (2016)

    2016

  12. [19]

    Sangha, A.K., Keyes, T.: Proteins Fold by Subdiffusion of the Order Parameter. J. Phys. Chem. B 113(48), 15886–15894 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1021/jp907009r . Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2009 doi

  13. [20]

    Sci- ence 349(6255), 1504–1510 (2015) https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1369

    Chung, H.S., Piana-Agostinetti, S., Shaw, D.E., Eaton, W.A.: Structural origin of slow diffusion in protein folding. Sci- ence 349(6255), 1504–1510 (2015) https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1369 . Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    2015 doi

  14. [21]

    Local structure and pep- tide folding

    Baldwin, R.L., Rose, G.D.: Is protein fold- ing hierarchic? I. Local structure and pep- tide folding. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 24(1), 26–33 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0968-0004(98)01346-2

    1999

  15. [22]

    Magdziarz, M., Weron, A., Burnecki, K., Klafter, J.: Fractional Brownian Motion Ver- sus the Continuous-Time Random Walk: A Simple Test for Subdiffusive Dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103(18), 180602 (2009) https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.180602

    2009 doi

  16. [23]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 139(12), 121916 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4816635

    Jeon, J.-H., Barkai, E., Metzler, R.: Noisy continuous time random walks. The Journal of Chemical Physics 139(12), 121916 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4816635

    2013 doi

  17. [24]

    Cairoli, A., Baule, A.: Langevin formula- tion of a subdiffusive continuous-time ran- dom walk in physical time. Phys. Rev. E 92(1), 012102 (2015) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevE.92.012102

    2015

  18. [25]

    Eur Biophys J 44(8), 613–621 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00249-015-1054-5

    Gmachowski, L.: Fractal model of anoma- lous diffusion. Eur Biophys J 44(8), 613–621 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00249-015-1054-5

    2015

  19. [26]

    Soft Matter 8(18), 4886–4889 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1039/C2SM25220A

    Ernst, D., Hellmann, M., K¨ ohler, J., Weiss, M.: Fractional Brownian motion in crowded fluids. Soft Matter 8(18), 4886–4889 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1039/C2SM25220A . Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry

    2012 doi

  20. [27]

    Mori, H.: Transport, Collective Motion, and Brownian Motion. Prog. Theor. Phys. 33(3), 423–455 (1965) https://doi.org/10. 1143/PTP.33.423

    1965

  21. [28]

    Ayaz, C., Scalfi, L., Dalton, B.A., Netz, R.R.: Generalized Langevin equation with a nonlinear potential of mean force and nonlinear memory friction from a hybrid projection scheme. Phys. Rev. E 105(5), 054138 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.105.054138 . Publisher: Am...

    2022 doi

  22. [29]

    Mitterwallner, B.G., Lavacchi, L., Netz, R.R.: Negative friction memory induces persistent motion. Eur. Phys. J. E 43(10), 67 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2020-11992-5

    2020 doi

  23. [30]

    Annual Review 12 of Physical Chemistry 76 (2024)

    Dalton, B.A., Klimek, A., Kiefer, H., Br¨ unig, F.N., Colinet, H., Tepper, L., Abbasi, A., Netz, R.R.: Memory and friction: From the nanoscale to the macroscale. Annual Review 12 of Physical Chemistry 76 (2024)

    2024

  24. [31]

    EPL 140(6), 62003 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/acab7d

    Vroylandt, H.: On the derivation of the generalized Langevin equation and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. EPL 140(6), 62003 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/acab7d . Pub- lisher: EDP Sciences, IOP Publishing and Societ` a Italiana di Fisica

    2022 doi

  25. [32]

    Netz, R.R.: Derivation of the nonequilibrium generalized Langevin equation from a time- dependent many-body Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. E 110(1), 014123 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.014123 . Pub- lisher: American Physical Society

    2024 doi

  26. [33]

    Mitterwallner, B.G., Schreiber, C., Dal- drop, J.O., R¨ adler, J.O., Netz, R.R.: Non-Markovian data-driven modeling of single-cell motility. Phys. Rev. E 101(3), 032408 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevE.101.032408 . Publisher: American Physical Society

    2020

  27. [34]

    Biophysical Journal (2024) https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.03.023

    Klimek, A., Mondal, D., Block, S., Sharma, P., Netz, R.R.: Data-driven classification of individual cells by their non-Markovian motion. Biophysical Journal (2024) https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.03.023

    2024 doi

  28. [35]

    Klimek, A., Heyn, J.C.J., Mondal, D., Schwartz, S., R¨ adler, J.O., Sharma, P., Block, S., Netz, R.R.: Intrinsic cell-to-cell vari- ance from experimental single-cell motility data. arXiv. arXiv:2410.14561 (2024). https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.14561 . http: //arxiv.org/...

    2024 doi arXiv

  29. [36]

    Kou, S.C., Xie, X.S.: Generalized Langevin Equation with Fractional Gaussian Noise: Subdiffusion within a Single Protein Molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(18), 180603 (2004) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.180603 . Publisher: American Physical Society

    2004 doi

  30. [37]

    Physics Reports 339(1), 1–77 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0370-1573(00)00070-3

    Metzler, R., Klafter, J.: The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a frac- tional dynamics approach. Physics Reports 339(1), 1–77 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0370-1573(00)00070-3

    2000

  31. [38]

    Kappler, J., No´ e, F., Netz, R.R.: Cycliza- tion and Relaxation Dynamics of Finite- Length Collapsed Self-Avoiding Polymers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(6), 067801 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.067801 . Publisher: American Physical Society

    2019 doi

  32. [39]

    John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, (2012)

    Goychuk, I.: Viscoelastic Subdiffusion: Gen- eralized Langevin Equation Approach, 150 edn. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, (2012). https: //doi.org/10.1002/9781118197714

    2012 doi

  33. [40]

    Goychuk, I.: Viscoelastic subdiffusion: From anomalous to normal. Phys. Rev. E 80(4), 046125 (2009) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046125

    2009 doi

  34. [41]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(31), 2023856118 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.2023856118

    Ayaz, C., Tepper, L., Br¨ unig, F.N., Kappler, J., Daldrop, J.O., Netz, R.R.: Non-Markovian modeling of protein folding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(31), 2023856118 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.2023856118 . Publisher: Proceedings of the National...

    2021

  35. [42]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(31), 2220068120 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2220068120

    Dalton, B.A., Ayaz, C., Kiefer, H., Klimek, A., Tepper, L., Netz, R.R.: Fast protein fold- ing is governed by memory-dependent fric- tion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(31), 2220068120 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2220068120 . Pub- lisher: Proceed...

    2023 doi

  36. [43]

    Phys- ical Review Letters 133(18), 188401 (2024)

    Dalton, B.A., Netz, R.R.: ph modulates fric- tion memory effects in protein folding. Phys- ical Review Letters 133(18), 188401 (2024)

    2024

  37. [44]

    Science 334(6055), 517–520 (2011) https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.1208351

    Lindorff-Larsen, K., Piana, S., Dror, R.O., Shaw, D.E.: How Fast-Folding Proteins Fold. Science 334(6055), 517–520 (2011) https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.1208351 . Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    2011 doi

  38. [45]

    The Annals of Applied Statistics 2(2), 501–535 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS149 13

    Kou, S.C.: Stochastic modeling in nanoscale biophysics: Subdiffusion within proteins. The Annals of Applied Statistics 2(2), 501–535 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS149 13 . Publisher: Institute of Mathematical Statis- tics

    2008 doi

  39. [46]

    Panja, D.: Generalized Langevin equation formulation for anomalous polymer dynam- ics. J. Stat. Mech. 2010(02), 02001 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2010/ 02/L02001

    2010 doi

  40. [47]

    Sprenger, A.R., Bair, C., L¨ owen, H.: Active Brownian motion with memory delay induced by a viscoelastic medium. Phys. Rev. E 105(4), 044610 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevE.105.044610

    2022

  41. [48]

    Nat Commun 15(1), 3761 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-024-48016-7

    Dalton, B.A., Kiefer, H., Netz, R.R.: The role of memory-dependent friction and solvent viscosity in isomerization kinet- ics in viscogenic media. Nat Commun 15(1), 3761 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-024-48016-7 . Publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group

    2024

  42. [49]

    Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(44), 17874–17879 (2013)

    Best, R.B., Hummer, G., Eaton, W.A.: Native contacts determine protein folding mechanisms in atomistic simulations. Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(44), 17874–17879 (2013)

    2013

  43. [50]

    Goychuk, I., P¨ oschel, T.: Finite-range vis- coelastic subdiffusion in disordered systems with inclusion of inertial effects. New J. Phys. 22(11), 113018 (2020) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1367-2630/abc603 . Publisher: IOP Publishing

    2020 doi

  44. [51]

    Kappler, J., Daldrop, J.O., Br¨ unig, F.N., Boehle, M.D., Netz, R.R.: Memory-induced acceleration and slowdown of barrier cross- ing. J. Chem. Phys. 148(1), 014903 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4998239 . Pub- lisher: American Institute of Physics

    2018 doi

  45. [52]

    Entropy 26(5), 425 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.3390/e26050425

    Wi´ sniewski, M., /suppress Luczka, J., Spiechowicz, J.: Memory Corrections to Markovian Langevin Dynamics. Entropy 26(5), 425 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.3390/e26050425 . Number: 5 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publish- ing Institute

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    Evers, F., Hanes, R.D.L., Zunke, C., Capell- mann, R.F., Bewerunge, J., Dalle-Ferrier, C., Jenkins, M.C., Ladadwa, I., Heuer, A., Casta˜ neda-Priego, R., Egelhaaf, S.U.: Col- loids in light fields: Particle dynamics in random and periodic energy landscapes. Eur. Phys. J. Spec....

    2013 doi

  47. [55]

    https://github.com/kanton42/msd subdiffusion

    Klimek, A.: Simulation tools and imple- mentations for multi-exponential memory (2025). https://github.com/kanton42/msd subdiffusion

    2025

  48. [56]

    Br¨ unig, F.N., Geburtig, O., Canal, A.v., Kap- pler, J., Netz, R.R.: Time-Dependent Friction Effects on Vibrational Infrared Frequencies and Line Shapes of Liquid Water. J. Phys. Chem. B 126(7), 1579–1589 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c09481 . Pub- lisher: America...

    2022 doi

  49. [57]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 148(1) (2018)

    Kappler, J., Daldrop, J.O., Br¨ unig, F.N., Boehle, M.D., Netz, R.R.: Memory-induced acceleration and slowdown of barrier cross- ing. The Journal of Chemical Physics 148(1) (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    Goychuk, I., P¨ oschel, T.: Fingerprints of viscoelastic subdiffusion in random envi- ronments: Revisiting some experimental data and their interpretations. Phys. Rev. E 104(3), 034125 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.034125 . Publisher: American Physical Society 1...

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.