Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Simulating dynamics of correlated matter with neural quantum states

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Neural quantum states are emerging as a competitive numerical method for simulating 2D quantum matter dynamics, reaching times comparable to or longer than infinite tensor networks in benchmark quenches.

desk verdict A solid, honest review of NQS dynamics; the DQPT caveat is real but the review already owns it. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03124 v1 pith:3MMJ4E3B submitted 2025-06-03 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elphysics.comp-ph

Markus Schmitt , Markus Heyl This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elphysics.comp-ph
keywords neuralquantumstatestime-dependentvariationalprinciplemany-bodydynamicstwo-dimensionalsystemsMonteCarlogeometrictensornetworkbenchmarksnon-equilibrium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that neural quantum states (NQS), wave functions encoded by artificial neural networks, have matured from a proof of principle into a practical tool for simulating the time evolution of correlated quantum matter, especially in two spatial dimensions. The authors aim to establish that NQS can reach system sizes and timescales beyond traditional methods such as exact diagonalization, quantum Monte Carlo with sign problems, and tensor networks limited by entanglement growth. They support this with a survey of applications: 2D quench benchmarks matching or surpassing iPEPS, the first numerical observation of Kibble-Zurek scaling in an interacting 2D magnet, high-resolution spectral functions, quantum circuit simulations, and dissipative dynamics to steady states. The review also maps the main open challenges, centered on expressivity and optimization of the neural ansatz.

What carries the argument

The central object is the time-dependent variational principle (TDVP) for neural quantum states, which projects the exact Schrödinger evolution onto the variational manifold at each time step. In its infinitesimal form it yields a first-order differential equation for the variational parameters, $\sum_{k'} \mathrm{Re}[S^{\boldsymbol{\theta}}_{k,k'}]\,\dot{\theta}_{k'} = \mathrm{Re}[F^{\boldsymbol{\theta}}_k]$, built from the quantum geometric tensor $S^{\boldsymbol{\theta}}$ (the Fubini-Study metric of the ansatz) and a force vector $F^{\boldsymbol{\theta}}$; both are estimated by Monte Carlo sampling of the Born distribution $p_{\boldsymbol{\theta}}(\mathbf{x}) \propto |\psi_{\boldsymbol{\theta}}(\mathbf{x})|^2$. The global form instead minimizes an infidelity cost between the propagated state and a re-optimized variational state using gradient-based optimization, often with natural gradient descent. A practical complement is the logarithmic ansatz $\psi_{\boldsymbol{\theta}}(\mathbf{x}) = \exp(\chi_{\boldsymbol{\theta}}(\mathbf{x}))$, which keeps wave-function amplitudes numerically tractable across many orders of magnitude.

What would settle it

An independent group re-implements the 2D transverse-field Ising quench benchmark of Fig. 3 (for instance, a 20x20 lattice quenched across the critical field) using different code and without author involvement, and finds that the NQS simulation consistently fails to reach the reported times or disagrees with the iPEPS reference; alternatively, a controlled comparison against exact diagonalization on small systems fails to reproduce the claimed accuracy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that neural quantum states are becoming a key numerical reference method for the dynamics of two-dimensional quantum many-body systems. It documents a series of advances: in 2D transverse-field Ising quenches, NQS simulations consistently reach times comparable to or longer than iPEPS benchmarks; in phase-transition dynamics, NQS enabled system sizes up to 20x20 spins and revealed universal Kibble-Zurek scaling; in spectral calculations, NQS produced highly resolved spin structure factors on 24x24 systems near the quantum critical point; and in open systems, neural-network density matrices captured the full approach to steady states. The authors present the time-dependent variational principle as the unifying machinery, in both its infinitesimal form (t-VMC) and global optimization form, and identify the outstanding obstacles: ill-conditioned quantum geometric tensors, biased Monte Carlo estimators when wave function amplitudes vanish, noisy TDVP equations, and non-convex optimization landscapes.

Load-bearing premise

The review's positive assessment rests on the assumption that the cited benchmarks are accurate, reproducible, and representative; since several landmark examples come from the authors' own prior work, the selection of what counts as progress could be influenced by their familiarity with those results.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • NQS can serve as a numerical reference for 2D quantum many-body dynamics, complementing tensor networks in regimes where entanglement growth limits iPEPS and where quantum Monte Carlo suffers from the sign problem.
  • Universal dynamical scaling, such as the Kibble-Zurek mechanism, can be verified numerically in interacting 2D systems at large system sizes, giving quantitative predictions for Rydberg and cold-atom quantum simulators.
  • High-resolution spectral functions and dynamical susceptibilities of 2D magnets can be computed on lattices up to 24x24 spins, connecting directly to inelastic x-ray and neutron scattering experiments.
  • Open-system dynamics described by Lindblad equations can be simulated to the final steady state using neural-network density matrices, extending NQS beyond unitary evolution.
  • Quantum circuits, including circuits with mid-circuit projective measurements, can be classically simulated with variational error equivalent to a small effective noise level, supporting verification of near-term quantum devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the central benchmarks are reproducible by independent groups, NQS could become the default classical cross-check for 2D quantum simulators, providing a controlled comparison for Rydberg atom arrays and optical lattice experiments.
  • The authors' identification of vanishing wave-function amplitudes at dynamical quantum phase transitions as a source of ill-defined t-VMC estimators suggests that global optimization methods, or hybrid local-global schemes, may be necessary for generic strong non-equilibrium dynamics; this direction is implicit in the review.
  • The observed rapid convergence of NQS results with network size hints that adaptively growing the network as correlations spread inside the Lieb-Robinson light cone could extend accessible simulation times without exponential cost, a design principle that the review leaves as an open possibility.
  • The same TDVP machinery is presented for Schrödinger, Lindblad, and Fokker-Planck equations, so an implicit corollary is that NQS time evolution is a general tool for first-order linear ODEs beyond quantum spin dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of neural quantum state (NQS) methods for simulating the time evolution of correlated quantum many-body systems. It introduces the NQS representation and Monte Carlo estimation of expectation values, derives and discusses local and global time-dependent variational principle (TDVP) approaches including the quantum geometric tensor and force vector, and surveys other evolution techniques such as explicitly time-dependent ansatze, exact diagonal operations, and Feynman-Kitaev constructions. The applications covered include quench dynamics in two-dimensional spin models, Kibble-Zurek dynamics, spectral functions, bosonic and fermionic systems, quantum circuits, open-system dynamics, and analytical classical-network solutions. The final sections catalog open challenges in expressivity and optimization, with emphasis on ill-defined Monte Carlo estimators at vanishing wave-function amplitudes, noisy TDVP equations, ill-conditioned quantum geometric tensors, and scaling limitations. The central claim is that NQS have become competitive numerical tools for the dynamics of two-dimensional quantum matter and have the potential to become a key reference method.

Significance. If the assessment is correct, this review provides a timely and useful synthesis of a rapidly developing field. Its strengths include a clear derivation of the TDVP equations and infidelity estimators, a broad and organized coverage of applications, and an honest discussion of open challenges. The manuscript does not present new numerical validations, which is appropriate for a review, and it is transparent about many limitations. However, the central positive claim about competitiveness in two dimensions is not fully reconciled with the review's own acknowledgment that the workhorse t-VMC estimators become biased and uncontrolled at generically occurring vanishing wave-function amplitudes. Resolving this tension is essential for the review to be a reliable guide to the field's current capabilities.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4.2.1 vs Sec. 3.1/Fig. 3] Section 4.2.1 states that when any amplitude ψθ(x)=0, the standard QGT/force estimators acquire unknown biases and become uncontrolled (Eq. 36); it further states that such zeros are generic at dynamical quantum phase transitions under strong nonequilibrium quenches, making the TDVP solution nonanalytic at those times. Yet Section 3.1 and Fig. 3 present quench simulations at h=2hc, h=hc, and h=hc/10 as evidence that NQS 'consistently reaches comparable or longer times' than iPEPS, without indicating whether the reported time intervals avoid DQPT singular times. This is a load-bearing gap for the review's central message: the reader cannot judge whether the showcased benchmarks are representative or whether they were terminated before the first singularity. The review should add an explicit statement of whether each benchmark interval lies in the safe regime, explain how the regularization described in Section 3.1 interacts with the bias at zeros, and if the benchmarks do avoid singular times, temper the generality of the 'competitive' claim accordingly.
  2. [Sec. 4.2.1] There is an internal tension in the discussion of vanishing wave-function amplitudes. The text first says the bias 'will only be relevant when the wave function vanishes on a finite fraction of basis configurations, which, however, is not a generic scenario,' and then, two paragraphs later, says 'the occurrence of vanishing wave function amplitudes in large systems is in fact generic' and that they 'occur generically for strong nonequilibrium scenarios.' The review should reconcile these statements by distinguishing typical equilibrium states from strongly driven time-evolved states, and it should state which of the reported applications fall into each class. As written, the section appears to contradict itself about a key limitation of the method.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (25)] In Eq. (25), after factoring dt^2 outside the bracket, the last term should be g_{ij}(G† y)_i (G y)_j rather than g_{ij}(G† y dt)_i (G y dt)_j; otherwise the time-step scaling is incorrect.
  2. [Sec. 4.2.1] The sentence 'the vanishing of which is in a one-to-one correspondence with a phase transition' overstates the result: a single wave-function amplitude vanishing at an isolated configuration is not a phase transition. The correspondence applies to the rate function or to a finite fraction of vanishing amplitudes, and the review should be phrased more carefully.
  3. [Sec. 4.2.1] The statement that 'no higher-order ODE solver is available' is too absolute. The intended meaning is that higher-order deterministic solvers are not reliably usable in the presence of Monte Carlo noise; please qualify the sentence accordingly.
  4. [Sec. 2.3] The reference to 'Walle et al.' should be 'Van de Walle et al.' to match the cited author name.
  5. [Eq. (7)] The variance in Eq. (7) is written as Var_{|ψ(x)|^2}(O_loc), but the sampling distribution is the normalized Born probability pθ(x)=|ψθ(x)|^2/⟨ψθ|ψθ⟩. Please clarify the notation to avoid confusion with the unnormalized squared amplitude.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's central assessment is a literature summary anchored by externally benchmarked results, and its own limitations section flags the estimator caveats rather than hiding them.

full rationale

This is a review article, not a derivation: the central claims about NQS competitiveness are literature summaries rather than predictions derived from fitted inputs. The load-bearing benchmark in Fig. 3 (Sec. 3.1) is presented as an adaptation of Ref. [64], but the comparison is against independent iPEPS data from Ref. [67], so the claim that 'the NQS approach consistently reaches comparable or longer times' is checked against an external reference rather than being true by construction. Many highlighted milestones are the authors' own works (Refs. [19], [21], [64], [79], [99], and others), but those are externally published, peer-reviewed results and are cited as evidence, not as an unverified self-consistency premise; self-citation alone is not circular under the review rules. The method section does not define any predicted quantity in terms of a fitted input: Eqs. (19) and (21) are TDVP equations derived from a short-time expansion of the Fubini-Study distance, with the QGT and force vector defined independently in Eqs. (17) and (18). No equation in the paper reduces to another by construction. The one passage that could look like a self-undermining admission is in Sec. 4.2.1, where the authors state that vanishing wave-function amplitudes make the QGT/force estimators biased (Eq. (36)) and that this raises an open question about fundamental limitations. That is an explicitly flagged limitation, not a circular step; it may bear on the representativeness of benchmark regimes or on correctness risk, but it is not a case of the paper's claims being equivalent to its inputs. Overall, no significant circularity found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review makes no new physical or methodological claims, so it introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its central assessment rests on standard quantum mechanics, the universal approximation property of neural networks, and Monte Carlo estimation theory.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Schrödinger equation i d/dt |psi> = H |psi> is the correct law of motion for closed quantum systems.
    Used throughout Section 2.2 as the target that TDVP methods aim to approximate; the relevance of the entire review depends on this law.
  • domain assumption A sufficiently large artificial neural network can represent any quantum wave function (universal approximation).
    Invoked in Section 2, where it says a sufficiently large NQS can in principle represent any quantum wave function. This underpins the claim that NQS is numerically exact in principle.
  • standard math Monte Carlo sampling of the Born probability distribution gives unbiased estimators for expectation values.
    Used in Section 2.1.1 and Section 2.2.1 for estimating local estimators, the QGT, and forces; the practical validity of t-VMC relies on this.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Simulating dynamics of correlated matter with neural quantum states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3MMJ4E3B

@misc{pith2026250603124,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Simulating dynamics of correlated matter with neural quantum states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3MMJ4E3B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03124}
}
read the original abstract

While experimental advancements continue to expand the capabilities to control and probe non-equilibrium quantum matter at an unprecedented level, the numerical simulation of the dynamics of correlated quantum systems remains a pivotal challenge - especially in intermediate spatial dimensions. Neural quantum states are emerging as a new computational tool to investigate the time evolution of many-body quantum systems in previously inaccessible regimes. We review the recent progress in the field with a focus on the different time propagation methods, an overview of the reported applications, and a discussion of the major current challenges.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Simulating dynamics of the two-dimensional transverse-field Ising model: a comparative study of large-scale classical numerics

    quant-ph 2025-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Classical simulations of the 2D transverse-field Ising model are reliable for quasi-adiabatic annealing across methods, but near-critical post-quench dynamics defeats MPS, TTN, 2DTN-BP, and NQS beyond tJ≈2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Expressivity: Which quantum states can be captured efficiently with the varia- tional ansatz and what defines its limitations? Which physical properties delineate the scope of the ansatz?

  2. [2]

    In the following we will discuss the open questions and challenges in the light of these two main pillars

    Optimization: Can we optimize or train the variational ansatz efficiently and how can we make maximal use of its expressivity? Can optimizability ultimately represent a prohibitive restriction? Clearly, optimal performance is reached when both pillars can operate at maximal capability. In the following we will discuss the open questions and challenges in ...

  3. [3]

    Many-body localization in a quantum simulator with programmable random disorder

    J. Smith et al., “Many-body localization in a quantum simulator with programmable random disorder”, Nature Physics 12, 907–911 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator

    H. Bernien et al., “Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator”, Nature 551, 579–584 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice

    M. Schreiber et al., “Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice”, Science 349, 842–845 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system

    S. Choi et al., “Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system”, Nature 543, 221–225 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Probing Slow Relaxation and Many-Body Localization in Two- Dimensional Quasiperiodic Systems

    P. Bordia et al., “Probing Slow Relaxation and Many-Body Localization in Two- Dimensional Quasiperiodic Systems”, Phys. Rev. X7, 041047 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Direct Observation of Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in an Interacting Many-Body System

    P. Jurcevic et al., “Direct Observation of Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in an Interacting Many-Body System”, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 080501 (2017)

    2017

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Laser-induced transient magnons in Sr 3Ir2O7 throughout the Brillouin zone

    D. G. Mazzone et al., “Laser-induced transient magnons in Sr 3Ir2O7 throughout the Brillouin zone”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2103696118 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Observation of a discrete time crystal

    J. Zhang et al., “Observation of a discrete time crystal”, Nature 543, 217–220 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Probing dynamics in quantum materials with femtosecond x-rays

    M. Buzzi et al., “Probing dynamics in quantum materials with femtosecond x-rays”, Nature Reviews Materials 3, 299–311 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Ultrafast switching to a stable hidden quantum state in an electronic crystal

    L. Stojchevska et al., “Ultrafast switching to a stable hidden quantum state in an electronic crystal”, Science 344, 177–180 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Colloquium: nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials

    A. de la Torre et al., “Colloquium: nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials”, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Possible light-induced superconductivity in k3c60 at high temperature

    M. Mitrano et al., “Possible light-induced superconductivity in k3c60 at high temperature”, Nature 530, 461–464 (2016). Simulating dynamics of correlated matter with neural quantum states 27

    2016

  7. [15]

    The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states

    U. Schollw ¨ock, “The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states”, Annals of Physics 326, 96–192 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Exact Diagonalization Methods for Quantum Systems

    H. Q. Lin et al., “Exact Diagonalization Methods for Quantum Systems”, Computers in Physics 7, 400–407 (1993)

    1993

  9. [17]

    Computational Complexity and Fundamental Limitations to Fermionic Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations

    M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, “Computational Complexity and Fundamental Limitations to Fermionic Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 170201, 170201 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks

    G. Carleo and M. Troyer, “Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks”, Science 355, 602–606 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states

    S. Paeckel et al., “Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states”, Annals of Physics 411, 167998 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory and its applications

    H. Aoki et al., “Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory and its applications”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 779–837 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    Highly resolved spectral functions of two- dimensional systems with neural quantum states

    T. Mendes-Santos, M. Schmitt, and M. Heyl, “Highly resolved spectral functions of two- dimensional systems with neural quantum states”, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 046501 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Quantum phase transition dynamics in the two-dimensional transverse- field Ising model

    M. Schmitt et al., “Quantum phase transition dynamics in the two-dimensional transverse- field Ising model”, Science Advances 8, eabl6850 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Classical variational simulation of the Quantum Approxi- mate Optimization Algorithm

    M. Medvidovi ´c and G. Carleo, “Classical variational simulation of the Quantum Approxi- mate Optimization Algorithm”, npj Quantum Information7, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group, 1–7 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks

    K. Hornik, “Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks”, Neural Netw 4, 251–257 (1991)

    1991

  17. [25]

    Ab-initio variational wave functions for the time- dependent many-electron schr¨odinger equation

    J. Nys, G. Pescia, and G. Carleo, “Ab-initio variational wave functions for the time- dependent many-electron schr¨odinger equation”, arXiv:2403.07447 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function

    G. Cybenko, “Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function”, Math. Control. Signals, Syst. 2, 303–314 (1989)

    1989

  19. [27]

    Empowering deep neural quantum states through efficient opti- mization

    A. Chen and M. Heyl, “Empowering deep neural quantum states through efficient opti- mization”, Nature Physics 20, 1476–1481 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Variational Quantum Dynamics of Two-Dimensional Rotor Models

    M. Medvidovi ´c and D. Sels, “Variational Quantum Dynamics of Two-Dimensional Rotor Models”, PRX Quantum 4, Publisher: American Physical Society, 040302 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    From architectures to applications: a review of neural quantum states

    H. Lange et al., “From architectures to applications: a review of neural quantum states”, Quantum Science and Technology 9, 040501 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Deep autoregressive models for the efficient variational simulation of many-body quantum systems

    O. Sharir et al., “Deep autoregressive models for the efficient variational simulation of many-body quantum systems”, en, Physical Review Letters 124, arXiv: 1902.04057, 020503 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Optimizing design choices for neural quantum states

    M. Reh, M. Schmitt, and M. G ¨arttner, “Optimizing design choices for neural quantum states”, Phys. Rev. B107, 195115 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Simulating quantum computers with probabilistic methods

    M. Van Den Nest, “Simulating quantum computers with probabilistic methods”, Quantum Info. Comput. 11, 784–812 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    Variational classical networks for dynamics in interacting quantum matter

    R. Verdel et al., “Variational classical networks for dynamics in interacting quantum matter”, Physical Review B103, Publisher: American Physical Society, 165103 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Generalized Cumulant Expansion Method

    R. Kubo, “Generalized Cumulant Expansion Method”, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 17, 1100–1120 (1962)

    1962

  27. [35]

    Quantum dynamics in transverse-field Ising models from classical networks

    M. Schmitt and M. Heyl, “Quantum dynamics in transverse-field Ising models from classical networks”, en, SciPost Physics4, 013 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    On the equivalence of time-dependent variational principles

    J. Brockhoeve et al., “On the equivalence of time-dependent variational principles”, en, Chemical Physics Letters 149, 547–550 (1988). 28 Markus Schmitt and Markus Heyl

    1988

  29. [37]

    Geometry of variational methods: dynamics of closed quantum systems

    L. Hackl et al., “Geometry of variational methods: dynamics of closed quantum systems”, en, SciPost Physics 9, 048 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Kramer and Saraceno, Marcos, Geometry of the time-dependent variational principle, 1st ed., Vol

    P. Kramer and Saraceno, Marcos, Geometry of the time-dependent variational principle, 1st ed., Vol. 140, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1981)

    1981

  31. [39]

    Light-cone effect and supersonic correlations in one- and two- dimensional bosonic superfluids

    G. Carleo et al., “Light-cone effect and supersonic correlations in one- and two- dimensional bosonic superfluids”, Phys. Rev. A89, 031602 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Time-dependent rotated hartree approach

    J. Kucar, H. D. Meyer, and L. S. Cederbaum, “Time-dependent rotated hartree approach”, Chemical Physics Letters 140, 525–530 (1987)

    1987

  33. [41]

    Localization and Glassy Dynamics Of Many-Body Quantum Systems

    G. Carleo et al., “Localization and Glassy Dynamics Of Many-Body Quantum Systems”, en, Scientific Reports 2, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group, 243 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Variational monte carlo approach to partial differential equations with neural networks

    M. Reh and M. G ¨arttner, “Variational monte carlo approach to partial differential equations with neural networks”, Machine Learning: Science and Technology3, 04LT02 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Neural-Network Approach to Dissipative Quantum Many- Body Dynamics

    M. J. Hartmann and G. Carleo, “Neural-Network Approach to Dissipative Quantum Many- Body Dynamics”, en, Physical Review Letters122, 250502 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Time-Dependent Variational Principle for Open Quantum Systems with Artificial Neural Networks

    M. Reh, M. Schmitt, and M. G ¨arttner, “Time-Dependent Variational Principle for Open Quantum Systems with Artificial Neural Networks”, en, Physical Review Letters 127, 230501 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Real time evolution with neural-network quantum states

    I. L. Guti ´errez and C. B. Mendl, “Real time evolution with neural-network quantum states”, en-GB, Quantum 6, Publisher: Verein zur F¨orderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften, 627 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    A survey of optimization methods from a machine learning perspective

    S. Sun et al., “A survey of optimization methods from a machine learning perspective”, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 50, 3668–3681 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Unbiasing time-dependent Variational Monte Carlo by projected quantum evolution

    A. Sinibaldi et al., “Unbiasing time-dependent Variational Monte Carlo by projected quantum evolution”, Quantum 7, 1131 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Neural-network states for the classical simulation of quantum computing

    B. J ´onsson, B. Bauer, and G. Carleo, “Neural-network states for the classical simulation of quantum computing”, arXiv:1808.05232 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Dynamics with autoregressive neural quantum states: application to critical quench dynamics

    K. Donatella et al., “Dynamics with autoregressive neural quantum states: application to critical quench dynamics”, Phys. Rev. A108, 022210 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Neural Projected Quantum Dynamics: a system- atic study

    L. Gravina, V. Savona, and F. Vicentini, “Neural Projected Quantum Dynamics: a system- atic study”, en, arXiv:2410.10720 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Variational optimization in the ai era: computational graph states and supervised wave-function optimization

    D. Kochkov and B. K. Clark, “Variational optimization in the ai era: computational graph states and supervised wave-function optimization”, arXiv:1811.12423 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Paths towards time evolution with larger neural-network quantum states

    W. Zhang et al., “Paths towards time evolution with larger neural-network quantum states”, arXiv:2406.03381, 10.48550/arXiv.2406.03381 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  45. [53]

    Discrete real-time learning of quantum-state subspace evolution of many-body systems in the presence of time-dependent control fields

    S. Gui, T.-S. Ho, and H. Rabitz, “Discrete real-time learning of quantum-state subspace evolution of many-body systems in the presence of time-dependent control fields”, Physical Review A 110, Publisher: American Physical Society, 052412 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Autoregressive Neural Network for Simulating Open Quantum Systems via a Probabilistic Formulation

    D. Luo et al., “Autoregressive Neural Network for Simulating Open Quantum Systems via a Probabilistic Formulation”, Physical Review Letters128, Publisher: American Physical Society, 090501 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Generalization properties of neural network approximations to frus- trated magnet ground states

    T. Westerhout et al., “Generalization properties of neural network approximations to frus- trated magnet ground states”, Nature Communications 11, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group, 1593 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Scaling of Neural-Network Quantum States for Time Evolu- tion

    S.-H. Lin and F. Pollmann, “Scaling of Neural-Network Quantum States for Time Evolu- tion”, en, physica status solidi (b) 259, 2100172 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Feynman’s clock, a new variational principle, and parallel-in-time quantum dynamics

    J. R. McClean, J. A. Parkhill, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, “Feynman’s clock, a new variational principle, and parallel-in-time quantum dynamics”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, E3901–E3909 (2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    Many-body dynamics with explicitly time- dependent neural quantum states

    A. V. d. Walle, M. Schmitt, and A. Bohrdt, “Many-body dynamics with explicitly time- dependent neural quantum states”, arXiv:2412.11830, 10.48550/arXiv.2412.11830 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  51. [59]

    Time-dependent Neural Galerkin Method for Quantum Dynamics

    A. Sinibaldi et al., “Time-dependent Neural Galerkin Method for Quantum Dynamics”, arXiv:2412.11778, 10.48550/arXiv.2412.11778 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  52. [60]

    Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, “Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices”, Science 357, 995–1001 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    An empirical study of quan- tum dynamics as a ground state problem with neural quantum states

    V. Vargas-Calder ´on, H. Vinck-Posada, and F. A. Gonz´alez, “An empirical study of quan- tum dynamics as a ground state problem with neural quantum states”, en, Quantum Information Processing 22, 165 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Quantum simulators: architectures and opportunities

    E. Altman et al., “Quantum simulators: architectures and opportunities”, PRX Quantum 2, 017003 (2021). Simulating dynamics of correlated matter with neural quantum states 29

    2021

  55. [63]

    Quenches near ising quantum criticality as a challenge for artificial neural networks

    S. Czischek, M. G ¨arttner, and T. Gasenzer, “Quenches near ising quantum criticality as a challenge for artificial neural networks”, Phys. Rev. B98, 024311 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, “Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms”, Nature Physics 16, 132–142 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    Quantum Bits with Josephson Junctions

    A. F. Kockum and F. Nori, “Quantum Bits with Josephson Junctions”, in Fundamentals and frontiers of the josephson effect, edited by F. Tafuri (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019), pp. 703–741

    2019

  58. [66]

    Real-time quantum dynamics of thermal states with neural thermofields

    J. Nys, Z. Denis, and G. Carleo, “Real-time quantum dynamics of thermal states with neural thermofields”, Physical Review B 109, Publisher: American Physical Society, 235120 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Quantum many-body dynamics in two dimensions with artificial neural networks

    M. Schmitt and M. Heyl, “Quantum many-body dynamics in two dimensions with artificial neural networks”, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 100503 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    Convolutional transformer wave functions

    A. Chen, V. D. Naik, and M. Heyl, “Convolutional transformer wave functions”, arXiv:2503.10462, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.10462 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?

    W. H. Zurek, “Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?”, Nature 317, 505–508 (1985)

    1985

  62. [70]

    Time evolution of an infinite projected entangled pair state: An efficient algorithm

    P. Czarnik, J. Dziarmaga, and P. Corboz, “Time evolution of an infinite projected entangled pair state: An efficient algorithm”, Physical Review B99, 035115 (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    Some implications of a cosmological phase transition

    T. Kibble, “Some implications of a cosmological phase transition”, Physics Reports 67, 183–199 (1980)

    1980

  64. [72]

    Computational supremacy in quantum simulation

    A. D. King et al., “Computational supremacy in quantum simulation”, arXiv:2403.00910, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.00910 (2024)

    2024 doi

  65. [73]

    Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simu- lator

    S. Ebadi et al., “Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simu- lator”, Nature 595, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group, 227–232 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Wave-Function Network Description and Kolmogorov Com- plexity of Quantum Many-Body Systems

    T. Mendes-Santos et al., “Wave-Function Network Description and Kolmogorov Com- plexity of Quantum Many-Body Systems”, Phys. Rev. X14, 021029 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    Quantum skyrmion dynamics studied by neural network quantum states

    A. Joshi, R. Peters, and T. Posske, “Quantum skyrmion dynamics studied by neural network quantum states”, Physical Review B110, Publisher: American Physical Society, 104411 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    Supermagnonic Propagation in Two-Dimensional Antiferromagnets

    G. Fabiani, M. Bouman, and J. Mentink, “Supermagnonic Propagation in Two-Dimensional Antiferromagnets”, Physical Review Letters 127, Publisher: American Physical Society, 097202 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    Ultrafast dynamics of entanglement in Heisenberg an- tiferromagnets

    G. Fabiani and J. H. Mentink, “Ultrafast dynamics of entanglement in Heisenberg an- tiferromagnets”, Physical Review B 105, Publisher: American Physical Society, 094438 (2022)

    2022

  70. [78]

    Artificial neural network based computation for out-of-time-ordered correlators

    Y. Wu, L.-M. Duan, and D.-L. Deng, “Artificial neural network based computation for out-of-time-ordered correlators”, Physical Review B 101, Publisher: American Physical Society, 214308 (2020)

    2020

  71. [79]

    Investigating ultrafast quantum magnetism with machine learning

    G. Fabiani and J. Mentink, “Investigating ultrafast quantum magnetism with machine learning”, SciPost Physics 7, 004 (2019)

    2019

  72. [80]

    Chaos in quantum channels

    P. Hosur et al., “Chaos in quantum channels”, Journal of High Energy Physics 2016, 4 (2016)

    2016

  73. [81]

    Topology by dissipation in atomic quantum wires

    S. Diehl et al., “Topology by dissipation in atomic quantum wires”, Nature Physics 7, 971–977 (2011)

    2011

  74. [82]

    Unitary Long-Time Evolution with Quantum Renormalization Groups and Artificial Neural Networks

    H. Burau and M. Heyl, “Unitary Long-Time Evolution with Quantum Renormalization Groups and Artificial Neural Networks”, Physical Review Letters127, Publisher: Ameri- can Physical Society, 050601 (2021)

    2021

  75. [83]

    Quantum States and Phases in Driven Open Quantum Systems with Cold Atoms

    S. Diehl et al., “Quantum States and Phases in Driven Open Quantum Systems with Cold Atoms”, Nature Physics 4, 878–883 (2008)

    2008

  76. [84]

    Positive-definite parametrization of mixed quantum states with deep neural networks

    F. Vicentini, R. Rossi, and G. Carleo, “Positive-definite parametrization of mixed quantum states with deep neural networks”, arXiv:2206.13488 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Engineered dissipation for quantum information science

    P. M. Harrington, E. J. Mueller, and K. W. Murch, “Engineered dissipation for quantum information science”, Nature Reviews Physics4, 660–671 (2022). 30 Markus Schmitt and Markus Heyl

    2022

  78. [86]

    Active quantum flocks

    R. Khasseh et al., “Active quantum flocks”, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.01603, arXiv:2308.01603 (2023)

    2023

  79. [87]

    Disorder-Free Localization in an Interacting 2D Lattice Gauge Theory

    P. Karpov et al., “Disorder-Free Localization in an Interacting 2D Lattice Gauge Theory”, Physical Review Letters126, Publisher: American Physical Society, 130401 (2021)

    2021

  80. [88]

    Test of quantum thermalization in the two-dimensional transverse- field Ising model

    B. Blaß and H. Rieger, “Test of quantum thermalization in the two-dimensional transverse- field Ising model”, Scientific Reports 6, 38185, 38185 (2016)

    2016

  81. [89]

    Robust spin squeezing from the tower of states of U(1)-symmetric spin Hamiltonians

    T. Comparin, F. Mezzacapo, and T. Roscilde, “Robust spin squeezing from the tower of states of U(1)-symmetric spin Hamiltonians”, Phys. Rev. A105, 022625, 022625 (2022)

    2022

  82. [90]

    Quantum entanglement in deep learning architectures

    Y. Levine et al., “Quantum entanglement in deep learning architectures”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 065301 (2019)

    2019

  83. [91]

    so that upon properly choosing the ANN, at least the parameter scaling of tensor networks has to be achievable. On a general level, the observation that only limited ANN sizes seem to be relevant in the solution of the dynamics of quantum matter can be attributed to the princi...

    2020

  84. [92]

    Efficiently solving the dynamics of many-body localized systems at strong disorder

    G. De Tomasi, F. Pollmann, and M. Heyl, “Efficiently solving the dynamics of many-body localized systems at strong disorder”, Phys. Rev. B99, 241114, 241114 (2019)

    2019

  85. [93]

    Quantum Entanglement in Neural Network States

    D.-L. Deng, X. Li, and S. Das Sarma, “Quantum Entanglement in Neural Network States”, en, Physical Review X7, 021021 (2017)

    2017

  86. [94]

    Neural tensor contractions and the expressive power of deep neural quantum states

    O. Sharir, A. Shashua, and G. Carleo, “Neural tensor contractions and the expressive power of deep neural quantum states”, Physical Review B 106, 10.1103/physrevb. 106.205136 (2022)

    2022 doi

  87. [95]

    Simplicity of mean-field theories in neural quantum states

    F. B. Trigueros, T. Mendes-Santos, and M. Heyl, “Simplicity of mean-field theories in neural quantum states”, Physical Review Research6, 023261, 023261 (2024)

    2024

  88. [96]

    When can classical neural networks represent quantum states?

    T.-H. Yang et al., “When can classical neural networks represent quantum states?”, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.23152, arXiv:2410.23152 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Scaling of Neural-Network Quantum States for Time Evolu- tion

    S.-H. Lin and F. Pollmann, “Scaling of Neural-Network Quantum States for Time Evolu- tion”, Physica Status Solidi B Basic Research259, 2100172, 2100172 (2022)

    2022

  90. [98]

    Lieb-robinson bounds in quantum many-body physics

    B. B. Nachtergaele and R. Sims, “Lieb-robinson bounds in quantum many-body physics.”, in Entropy and the quantum , Vol. 529, Contemporary Mathematics (American Mathe- matical Society, 2010)

    2010

  91. [99]

    Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in the Transverse-Field Ising Model

    M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein, “Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in the Transverse-Field Ising Model”, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 135704, 135704 (2013)

    2013

  92. [100]

    Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review

    M. Heyl, “Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review”, Reports on Progress in Physics 81, 054001, 054001 (2018)

    2018

  93. [101]

    Role of stochastic noise and generalization error in the time propaga- tion of neural-network quantum states

    D. Hofmann et al., “Role of stochastic noise and generalization error in the time propaga- tion of neural-network quantum states”, en, SciPost Physics12, 165 (2022)

    2022

  94. [102]

    jVMC: Versatile and performant variational Monte Carlo lever- aging automated differentiation and GPU acceleration

    M. Schmitt and M. Reh, “jVMC: Versatile and performant variational Monte Carlo lever- aging automated differentiation and GPU acceleration”, SciPost Physics Codebases, 002 (2022)

    2022

  95. [103]

    G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix computations - 4th edition (Johns Hopkins University Press, Philadelphia, PA, 2013)

    2013

  96. [104]

    On “natural

    T. Heskes, “On “natural” learning and pruning in multilayered perceptrons”, Neural Computation 12, 881–901 (2000)

    2000

  97. [105]

    Exact natural gradient in deep linear networks and its application to the nonlinear case

    A. Bernacchia, M. Lengyel, and G. Hennequin, “Exact natural gradient in deep linear networks and its application to the nonlinear case”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (2018)

    2018

  98. [106]

    Fast convergence of natural gradient descent for over-parameterized neural networks

    G. Zhang, J. Martens, and R. B. Grosse, “Fast convergence of natural gradient descent for over-parameterized neural networks”, in Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 32, edited by H. Wallach et al. (2019)

    2019

  99. [107]

    C. P. Robert and G. Casella, Monte Carlo Statistical Methods, 2nd ed., Springer Texts in Statistics (Springer New York, NY, 2004)

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.