Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

From Theory to Practice: Real-World Use Cases on Trustworthy LLM-Driven Process Modeling, Prediction and Automation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.03801 v1 pith:FY6KMEV3 submitted 2025-06-04 cs.SE cs.LGcs.MA

From Theory to Practice: Real-World Use Cases on Trustworthy LLM-Driven Process Modeling, Prediction and Automation

classification cs.SE cs.LGcs.MA
keywords processllmsmodelingautomationdesigncasesenvironmentsllm-driven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Traditional Business Process Management (BPM) struggles with rigidity, opacity, and scalability in dynamic environments while emerging Large Language Models (LLMs) present transformative opportunities alongside risks. This paper explores four real-world use cases that demonstrate how LLMs, augmented with trustworthy process intelligence, redefine process modeling, prediction, and automation. Grounded in early-stage research projects with industrial partners, the work spans manufacturing, modeling, life-science, and design processes, addressing domain-specific challenges through human-AI collaboration. In manufacturing, an LLM-driven framework integrates uncertainty-aware explainable Machine Learning (ML) with interactive dialogues, transforming opaque predictions into auditable workflows. For process modeling, conversational interfaces democratize BPMN design. Pharmacovigilance agents automate drug safety monitoring via knowledge-graph-augmented LLMs. Finally, sustainable textile design employs multi-agent systems to navigate regulatory and environmental trade-offs. We intend to examine tensions between transparency and efficiency, generalization and specialization, and human agency versus automation. By mapping these trade-offs, we advocate for context-sensitive integration prioritizing domain needs, stakeholder values, and iterative human-in-the-loop workflows over universal solutions. This work provides actionable insights for researchers and practitioners aiming to operationalize LLMs in critical BPM environments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Assessing the Business Process Modeling Competences of Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    Open-source LLMs can produce BPMN process models that rival human experts on syntax and readability, but they lag on semantic accuracy and frequently generate invalid BPMN-XML.

  2. Multi-Modal Vision vs. Text-Based Parsing: Benchmarking LLM Strategies for Invoice Processing

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    Across three invoice datasets, multimodal LLMs extract fields more accurately from raw images than from markdown converted by a parsing tool, with Gemini 2.5 Pro leading.