Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

HSSBench: Benchmarking Humanities and Social Sciences Ability for Multimodal Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.03922 v4 pith:5OOW6IQN submitted 2025-06-04 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
keywords mllmshssbenchbenchmarkknowledgemodelsacrosschallengesdesigned
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant potential to advance a broad range of domains. However, current benchmarks for evaluating MLLMs primarily emphasize general knowledge and vertical step-by-step reasoning typical of STEM disciplines, while overlooking the distinct needs and potential of the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS). Tasks in the HSS domain require more horizontal, interdisciplinary thinking and a deep integration of knowledge across related fields, which presents unique challenges for MLLMs, particularly in linking abstract concepts with corresponding visual representations. Addressing this gap, we present HSSBench, a dedicated benchmark designed to assess the capabilities of MLLMs on HSS tasks in multiple languages, including the six official languages of the United Nations. We also introduce a novel data generation pipeline tailored for HSS scenarios, in which multiple domain experts and automated agents collaborate to generate and iteratively refine each sample. HSSBench contains over 13,000 meticulously designed samples, covering six key categories. We benchmark more than 20 mainstream MLLMs on HSSBench and demonstrate that it poses significant challenges even for state-of-the-art models. We hope that this benchmark will inspire further research into enhancing the cross-disciplinary reasoning abilities of MLLMs, especially their capacity to internalize and connect knowledge across fields.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. KAME: Tandem Architecture for Enhancing Knowledge in Real-Time Speech-to-Speech Conversational AI

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    By injecting a back-end LLM's text responses into a streaming speech-to-speech model as oracle tokens, KAME improves MT-Bench answer scores from 2.05 to 6.43 at unchanged median latency.

  2. Perception, Reason, Think, and Plan: A Survey on Large Multimodal Reasoning Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey organizes multimodal reasoning research into a staged roadmap and proposes native large multimodal reasoning models that unify perception, generation, and agentic planning.

Pith tools