REVIEW 7 cited by
Unfolding Spatial Cognition: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Visual Simulations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Spatial cognition is essential for human intelligence, enabling problem-solving through visual simulations rather than solely relying on verbal reasoning. However, existing AI benchmarks primarily assess verbal reasoning, neglecting the complexities of non-verbal, multi-step visual simulation. We introduce STARE(Spatial Transformations and Reasoning Evaluation), a benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate multimodal large language models on tasks better solved through multi-step visual simulation. STARE features 4K tasks spanning foundational geometric transformations (2D and 3D), integrated spatial reasoning (cube net folding and tangram puzzles), and real-world spatial reasoning (perspective and temporal reasoning), reflecting practical cognitive challenges like object assembly, mechanical diagram interpretation, and everyday spatial navigation. Our evaluations show that models excel at reasoning over simpler 2D transformations, but perform close to random chance on more complex tasks like 3D cube net folding and tangram puzzles that require multi-step visual simulations. Humans achieve near-perfect accuracy but take considerable time (up to 28.9s) on complex tasks, significantly speeding up (down by 7.5 seconds on average) with intermediate visual simulations. In contrast, models exhibit inconsistent performance gains from visual simulations, improving on most tasks but declining in specific cases like tangram puzzles (GPT-4o, o1) and cube net folding (Claude-3.5, Gemini-2.0 Flash), indicating that models may not know how to effectively leverage intermediate visual information.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
HumanCLAW: Can Vision-Language Models Act Through a Body?
A new full-body benchmark shows that current VLMs can recognize targets but cannot reliably tell where their own body is, whether it arrived, or whether it collided; the best solves only 16.8% of episodes.
-
VGenST-Bench: A Benchmark for Spatio-Temporal Reasoning via Active Video Synthesis
VGenST-Bench is a new video benchmark for MLLM spatio-temporal reasoning built via generative synthesis, a multi-agent pipeline with human oversight, a 3x2x2 taxonomy, and hierarchical tasks separating perception from...
-
HumanCLAW: Can Vision-Language Models Act Through a Body?
Off-the-shelf VLMs fail closed-loop whole-body find-navigate-interact tasks (best 16.8%) because they lack embodied self-awareness, not target recognition.
-
Do MLLMs Really Understand Space? A Mathematical Reasoning Evaluation
MLLMs show a large gap in spatial mathematical reasoning compared to humans, and a new 10,000-problem dataset helps narrow it through training.
-
MentisOculi: Revealing the Limits of Reasoning with Mental Imagery
Visual thoughts — latent tokens, interleaved images, or video rollouts — do not currently improve multi-step reasoning over text-only baselines in frontier models.
-
Mull-Tokens: Modality-Agnostic Latent Thinking
Mull-Tokens are modality-agnostic latent tokens that enable free-form multimodal thinking and deliver up to 16% gains on spatial reasoning benchmarks.
-
PointVG-R: Internalizing Geometric Reasoning in MLLMs for Precise Pointing Localization via Visual Chain of Thought
PointVG-R is a new MLLM that reaches SOTA on pointing localization by 15.86 mIoU points via a geometric reasoning pipeline, EgoPoint-CoT dataset, SFT, RL, and variance-based reward weighting.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.