Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 98 references

Axion-mediated photon-to-photon transitions in high finesse dielectric resonators

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A dielectric sphere could catch axions with no magnet

desk verdict Sound analytical core with a genuinely new selection rule, but the DARK-ROSE sensitivity wedge is built on numbers that do not reproduce from the paper's own scaling. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04666 v3 pith:X7EKNHH7 submitted 2025-06-05 hep-ph cond-mat.mtrl-scihep-th

Evangelos Almpanis This is my paper
classification hep-phcond-mat.mtrl-scihep-th
keywords axiondarkmatteraxion-photoncouplingMieresonancesdielectricresonatortripleresonanceDARK-ROSEwhisperinggallerymodesQCD
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that dark-matter axions can knock photons from one mode to another inside a single spherical dielectric resonator, and that the effect can be made strong enough to probe axion-photon couplings as small as $|\tilde{g}_{a\gamma\gamma}|\sim10^{-15}\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. The enabling condition is a triple resonance: the sphere's TE$_\ell$ and TM$_\ell$ Mie modes are split in frequency by an amount that can be matched to the axion mass, and the axion interaction flips mode parity while conserving angular momentum $\ell$. The paper derives this selection rule from group theory, computes the first-order transition rate analytically, and designs an experiment, DARK-ROSE, that needs no external magnetic field. If the claim holds, it opens a compact, magnet-free route to axion dark matter searches in the micro-electronvolt mass range.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the overlap integral $G=g_{\alpha\gamma\gamma}\int_V d^3r\,A(r)\,[\mathbf{B}_f^*\cdot\mathbf{E}_i-\mathbf{E}_f^*\cdot\mathbf{B}_i]$ between the initial TE and final TM Mie fields, evaluated with a homogeneous axion amplitude $A$. Mie modes are the multipolar electromagnetic resonances of a dielectric sphere, labeled by polarization (TE/TM) and angular momentum $\ell$; the selection rule, that parity flips while $\ell$ is conserved, follows from $D^{(0)}_u\otimes D^{(\ell)}_{g/u}$ under the O(3) group. The triple resonance is set by $\omega_{\mathrm{TM}_\ell}-\omega_{\mathrm{TE}_\ell}=\Omega_a$, with the scaled splitting $\Delta f\,S/c\simeq0.05$ almost independent of $\ell$, so the sphere radius fixes the target axion mass. Fermi's golden rule with a Lorentzian density of states converts the matrix element into a rate.

What would settle it

Fabricate a 62.5 mm dielectric sphere, measure the TE$_{10}$ and TM$_{10}$ resonance frequencies and linewidths at cryogenic temperature, and check whether the 242 MHz splitting can be set to the 1 $\mu$eV/$c^2$ axion frequency with loaded $Q\gtrsim10^4$; failure of either condition would invalidate the $1.35\times10^{-4}$ Hz rate and the DARK-ROSE sensitivity wedge in Fig. 4.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is a fully analytic, first-order perturbative calculation of axion-mediated transitions between the TE$_\ell$ and TM$_\ell$ Mie modes of a homogeneous dielectric sphere. Because the axion field is a pseudoscalar, the perturbation $\delta\hat{V}\propto\alpha(r,t)\begin{pmatrix}0&-1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}$ transforms under the $D^{(0)}_u$ representation of O(3), so allowed transitions change the mode parity but keep $\ell$ fixed. For a silicon-like sphere with $\epsilon=12$ and radius $S=62.5$ mm, the $\ell=10$ TE and TM modes sit at 4.697 GHz and 4.939 GHz; their 242 MHz splitting matches a 1 $\mu$eV/$c^2$ axion. The single-photon rate is $R_{\alpha\gamma\gamma}\simeq0.9\times10^{-29}$ Hz, rising to $\tilde{R}\simeq1.35\times10^{-4}$ Hz when the resonator is pumped to its maximum stored photon number $N\simeq1.5\times10^{25}$. With whispering-gallery-mode quality factors up to $10^{10}$ and high-breakdown materials such as diamond, the projected rate reaches tens of hertz, corresponding to a sensitivity $|\tilde{g}_{a\gamma\gamma}|\gtrsim10^{-15}$ GeV$^{-1}$ near $m_a\sim0.2$ $\mu$eV/$c^2$.

Load-bearing premise

The entire rate estimate relies on treating the sphere's lossy Mie resonances as quantized, lossless photon eigenstates with the quoted quality factors, and on the TE-TM splitting being tunable exactly to the axion mass while the axion field stays uniform across the sphere.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $m_a=1$ $\mu$eV/$c^2$, a 62.5 mm silicon sphere pumped to $N\simeq1.5\times10^{25}$ stored photons yields a photon-to-photon rate $\tilde{R}\simeq1.35\times10^{-4}$ Hz, a signal level typical of cavity-based dark matter searches.
  • With whispering-gallery-mode quality factors and high-breakdown materials, the projected rate reaches about 58 Hz, enough to probe $|\tilde{g}_{a\gamma\gamma}|\sim10^{-15}$ GeV$^{-1}$ and approach the QCD axion benchmark band near 0.2 $\mu$eV/$c^2$.
  • Scanning the axion mass is possible by changing the sphere radius or by embedding the sphere in a liquid with tunable refractive index, covering roughly half an octave per configuration.
  • No static magnetic field is needed, and the input and output photons are separated by hundreds of MHz with opposite polarization, so pump and signal are easy to distinguish.
  • The same axion-mediated photon-transition mechanism can be adapted to shining-through-walls experiments and, with axion-like materials, to solid-state axion quasiparticles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quoted sensitivity assumes every stored photon contributes coherently; mode-mixing or refractive-index nonlinearities at high field could reduce the effective number, so the real reach may be set by how cleanly the TE and TM modes can be isolated.
  • Because the axion field is treated as uniform across the sphere, a future experiment correlating two small spheres at different locations could in principle probe the axion field's spatial coherence.
  • The selection rule is derived for exact spherical symmetry; a slightly deformed or coated sphere would break the O(3) classification and could open additional transition channels, which might either improve or degrade the signal-to-background ratio.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new axion-detection scheme based on axion-mediated photon-to-photon transitions between Mie resonances of a spherical dielectric resonator. It derives the interaction Hamiltonian from the standard axion-photon Lagrangian, computes the transition matrix element between TE_l and TM_l modes, uses O(3) group theory to derive the selection rule (parity change with l conserved), and evaluates the transition rate for a 62.5 mm silicon sphere at m_a = 1 micro-eV/c^2. The paper then extrapolates the rate to m_a = 1 meV/c^2 by scaling arguments, and uses these extrapolations to propose the DARK-ROSE experiment, claiming projected sensitivity reaching |g| ~ 1e-15 GeV^-1 near 1 micro-eV and a possible intersection with the KSVZ/DFSZ bands near 0.2 micro-eV/c^2.

Significance. The work has genuine strengths: the first-order perturbative calculation is fully analytical, the selection rule is derived explicitly from the O(3) character table, the numerical reference-point calculation is internally consistent (|G| ~ 1.4e-27 eV, R ~ 0.9e-29 Hz, enhanced to 1.35e-4 Hz at N = 1.5e25), and the proposed setup requires no external magnetic field. If the projected sensitivity were properly supported, this would be a valuable new haloscope-style approach. However, the central reach claim is currently undermined by a quantitative inconsistency in the 1 meV scaling analysis and by an unclear construction of the sensitivity wedge in Fig. 4, so the projected DARK-ROSE reach, including the claimed KSVZ intersection, is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, scaling to m_a = 1 meV; Fig. 4] The text states that a scaling suppression of ~1e-15 in the transition rate implies a detection threshold |g| > 1.54e-9 GeV^-1 at m_a = 1 meV/c^2. This number does not follow from the stated scaling and detection threshold. Starting from the advanced 1 micro-eV reference (R = 58.3 Hz at |g| = 1e-15) and applying the 1e-15 rate suppression gives R = 5.83e-14 Hz at fixed coupling, so requiring R > 200 Hz yields |g| ~ 5.9e-8 GeV^-1, close to the 3.16e-8 GeV^-1 endpoint used in Fig. 4 but not to 1.54e-9 GeV^-1. Starting from the base case (R = 1.35e-4 Hz at |g| = 1e-15) gives |g| ~ 3.8e-5 GeV^-1 instead. Neither path reproduces 1.54e-9 GeV^-1. Since the DARK-ROSE wedge and the claimed KSVZ intersection are extrapolations from this scaling, the sensitivity analysis must be recomputed with the reference assumptions stated explicitly.
  2. [Section V, Fig. 4 wedge construction] The caption and the main text say the rose-shaded wedge is constructed by interpolating between [m_a = 1 micro-eV, |g| = 1e-15] and [m_a = 1 meV, |g| = 3.16e-8] and extrapolating down to 0.2 micro-eV. On log-log axes, that interpolation has a slope of about 2.5 in log|g| per decade of m_a, and a straight extrapolation to 0.2 micro-eV would put the reach at |g| ~ 2e-17 GeV^-1, which is far below the KSVZ/DFSZ bands. The paper does not define the shape of the wedge or the meaning of "extrapolating down," so the headline claim that DARK-ROSE could intersect KSVZ/DFSZ near 0.2 micro-eV is not supported by the stated construction.
  3. [Section V, sensitivity assumptions at m_a = 1 micro-eV] Three different sensitivity numbers are reported for the same reference mass: the Emax-limited case gives |g| > 1.22e-12 GeV^-1 with Q_f = 1.5e4 and N = 1.5e25; a practical 10 W pump gives |g| > 1.31e-9 GeV^-1; and the advanced WGM/diamond case gives |g| >~ 1e-15 GeV^-1. The text does not state which of these is represented by the wedge in Fig. 4, and the Abstract's claim of "experimentally accessible mass regimes" appears to rest on the most optimistic advanced assumptions rather than on the practical 10 W case. The figure and the conclusion should clearly separate near-term reach from idealized long-term projections.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title/header] The header contains a typo: "high fines se dielectric resonators" should read "high finesse dielectric resonators."
  2. [Section V, Eq. (18) and the 1 meV scaling paragraph] The notation for the single-photon amplitudes changes between the main calculation (a0_i;Mlm, a0_f;Elm) and the scaling paragraph (alpha_Mlm, alpha_Elm); unify these symbols to avoid confusion.
  3. [Section V, density of states expression] In the line defining Q_f, the expression Q_f ~= hbar*omega_f/(h*Gamma_f) should be written as omega_f/(2*pi*Gamma_f) (or f_f/Gamma_f) with Gamma_f the FWHM in frequency, to make the units transparent.
  4. [Section V, Fig. 2 caption] The word "axion" appears as "ℓxion" in the caption; please correct the encoding/rendering.
  5. [Section V, first numerical paragraph] The sentence setting the indicative coupling |~g_aγγ| ~ 1e-15 GeV^-1 should clarify that this is a benchmark input for the rate calculation, not a derived sensitivity; the derived sensitivities appear later.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central rate calculation follows from the standard axion-photon Lagrangian and analytic Mie-mode expansions, with no fitted parameter or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against first principles. The transition rate starts from the accepted axion-photon interaction Lagrangian (Eq. 3) and the standard Mie-mode field expansions (Eqs. 1-2), which are external textbook results; the matrix element G in Eq. 18 is obtained by direct analytic integration, and the rate is obtained via Fermi's golden rule with no parameter fitted to the quoted rate. The mode normalization to the one-photon vacuum energy, attributed to Ref. [77], is a conventional normalization and does not encode the target DARK-ROSE sensitivity. The selection rule is derived from O(3) group theory and, as stated, can be checked independently by angular integration of vector spherical harmonics; the self-citations (Refs. [77,78,95,101]) support standard mode expansions and Brillouin-scattering analogies, but they are not load-bearing for the central claim, which would stand if those citations were replaced by any standard Mie-theory reference. The Fig. 4 reach is an extrapolation of the analytically computed reference points, not a fit to data that defines the prediction. There is an internal numerical inconsistency in the meV scaling paragraph (text threshold 1.54e-9 GeV^-1 vs Fig. 4 wedge point 3.16e-8 GeV^-1), but this is a consistency/arithmetic issue in the projection, not a circular reduction of a prediction to its input. No quoted equation defines a result in terms of the quantity it is said to predict, so no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation uses the standard axion Lagrangian and Mie theory; no new parameters are fitted to data. The main hand-set inputs are material permittivity, quoted Q factors, stored photon number, and detector threshold, which together set the projected reach. No new particles or fields are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Resonator relative permittivity epsilon = 12
    Choice of silicon-like material; sets the Mie mode frequencies and splitting. Not fitted to axion data, but a design input.
  • Quality factors Q_i and Q_f = Q_i ~ 1.9e4, Q_f ~ 1.5e4
    Quoted from Mie resonance linewidths; used in density of states and photon accumulation. Not independently derived in the paper.
  • Axion field amplitude A = 2.48e3 eV
    Derived from local DM density rho = 4e14 eV/m^3 and m_a = 1 micro-eV; standard halo input, not fitted.
  • Stored photon number N = 1.5e25 (breakdown limit) or 1.3e19 (10 W pump)
    Selected by assumed breakdown field and pump power; directly multiplies the single-photon transition rate.
  • Detector threshold rate = 200 Hz
    Assumed detectable rate with single-photon detectors (efficiency 0.5, dark count 100 Hz). Affects projected coupling reach.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Axion-photon interaction L = -g alpha E dot B
    The entire mechanism rests on the standard axion Lagrangian; no alternative coupling considered.
  • domain assumption Galactic axion field is coherent, monochromatic, and spatially homogeneous over the resonator
    Used in Eq. 8 and the homogeneity assumption A(r) approx A; reasonable for m_a ~ 1 micro-eV but an approximation.
  • domain assumption First-order Born approximation is valid and Fermi's golden rule applies
    Assumes weak coupling and long mode lifetime; stated in Section IV.
  • domain assumption Dielectric sphere is lossless, homogeneous, nonmagnetic, with modes given by spherical Bessel functions and O(3) symmetry
    Mie resonance treatment in Section II; real losses are accounted only through a linewidth Q.
  • standard math Mode normalization to one-photon energy as in Ref. [77]
    Used to set coefficients a_i and a_f; not re-derived in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Axion-mediated photon-to-photon transitions in high finesse dielectric resonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X7EKNHH7

@misc{pith2026250604666,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Axion-mediated photon-to-photon transitions in high finesse dielectric resonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X7EKNHH7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04666}
}
read the original abstract

Axions are hypothetical particles that could address both the strong charge-parity problem in quantum chromodynamics and the enigmatic nature of dark matter. However, if axions exist, their mass remains unknown, and they are expected to interact very weakly with the electromagnetic field, which explains why they have not been detected yet. This study proposes a way to substantially augment the axion-photon interaction by confining the photons within high-quality-factor dielectric resonators, increasing their intensity and lifetime, and thus the possibility of interacting with axions in the background. In view of this, we study resonant axion-mediated photonic transitions in millimeter-sized spherical dielectric resonators, based on fully analytical calculations to the first order in perturbation theory. Such resonators exhibit high lifetime Mie resonances in the microwave part of the spectrum, with a separation that can be tailored with the radius of the sphere to match the expected axion frequency, allowing axion-mediated photonic transitions when particular selection rules are fulfilled. We predict experimentally accessible axion mass regimes where such triply resonant transitions can be realized with standard dielectric resonators. We propose an experiment for probing such interactions named DARK-ROSE.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04666 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Discrete photonic Mie resonance frequencies for a sp [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Schematic representation of axion-induced photoni [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) Scaled resonance frequencies ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Constraints and projected sensitivities on the axio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author V. C. Rubin and author W. K. Ford Jr , journal Astrophysical Journal, vol. 159, p. 379 volume 159 , pages 379 ( year 1970 )

    1970

  2. [2]

    Heinemeyer , author M

    author S. Heinemeyer , author M. Mondragon , and author G. Zoupanos , journal Journal of High Energy Physics volume 2008 , pages 135 ( year 2008 )

    2008

  3. [3]

    Catena and author C

    author R. Catena and author C. Kouvaris , journal Physical Review D volume 96 , pages 063012 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  4. [4]

    author N. E. Mavromatos , author C. R. Arg \"u elles , author R. Ruffini , and author J. A. Rueda , journal International Journal of Modern Physics D volume 26 , pages 1730007 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  5. [5]

    Bertone and author D

    author G. Bertone and author D. Hooper , journal Reviews of Modern Physics volume 90 , pages 045002 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  6. [6]

    author D. F. Jackson Kimball and author K. Van Bibber , title The search for ultralight bosonic dark matter ( publisher Springer Nature , year 2023 )

    2023

  7. [7]

    author M. M. Flores , author C. Kouvaris , and author A. Kusenko , journal Physical Review D volume 108 , pages 103545 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  8. [8]

    Choi , author S

    author K. Choi , author S. H. Im , and author C. S. Shin , journal Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science volume 71 , pages 225 ( year 2021 )

    2021

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    author J. E. Kim and author G. Carosi , journal Reviews of Modern Physics volume 82 , pages 557 ( year 2010 )

    2010

  2. [10]

    Adams , author N

    author C. Adams , author N. Aggarwal , author A. Agrawal , author R. Balafendiev , author C. Bartram , author M. Baryakhtar , author H. Bekker , author P. Belov , author K. Berggren , author A. Berlin , et al. , journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.14923 ( year 2022 )

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    author R. D. Peccei and author H. R. Quinn , journal Physical Review Letters volume 38 , pages 1440 ( year 1977 )

    1977

  4. [12]

    Wilczek , journal Physical Review Letters volume 40 , pages 279 ( year 1978 )

    author F. Wilczek , journal Physical Review Letters volume 40 , pages 279 ( year 1978 )

    1978

  5. [13]

    Weinberg , journal Physical Review Letters volume 40 , pages 223 ( year 1978 )

    author S. Weinberg , journal Physical Review Letters volume 40 , pages 223 ( year 1978 )

    1978

  6. [14]

    Coriano , author N

    author C. Coriano , author N. Irges , and author S. Morelli , journal Journal of High Energy Physics volume 2007 , pages 008 ( year 2007 )

    2007

  7. [15]

    Masso and author J

    author E. Masso and author J. Redondo , journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics volume 2005 , pages 015 ( year 2005 )

    2005

  8. [16]

    Chatzistavrakidis , author E

    author A. Chatzistavrakidis , author E. Erfani , author H. P. Nilles , and author I. Zavala , journal Journal of cosmology and astroparticle physics volume 2012 , pages 006 ( year 2012 )

    2012

  9. [17]

    author M. D. Marsh , author H. R. Russell , author A. C. Fabian , author B. R. McNamara , author P. Nulsen , and author C. S. Reynolds , journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics volume 2017 , pages 036 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  10. [18]

    author N. E. Mavromatos , journal Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity p. pages 3 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  11. [19]

    author I. G. Irastorza and author J. Redondo , journal Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics volume 102 , pages 89 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  12. [20]

    Desjacques , author A

    author V. Desjacques , author A. Kehagias , and author A. Riotto , journal Physical Review D volume 97 , pages 023529 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  13. [21]

    Kouvaris , author T

    author C. Kouvaris , author T. Liu , and author K.-F. Lyu , journal Physical Review D volume 109 , pages 023008 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  14. [22]

    Alexander , author T

    author S. Alexander , author T. Manton , and author E. McDonough , journal Physical Review D volume 109 , pages 116019 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  15. [23]

    author B. D. Tellegen , journal Philips Res. Rep volume 3 , pages 81 ( year 1948 )

    1948

  16. [24]

    author L. D. Landau and author E. M. L \' fsh \' ts , title Electrodynamics of continuous media , vol. volume 2 ( publisher Pergamon Press Oxford , year 1960 )

    1960

  17. [25]

    author I. E. Dzyaloshinskii , journal Soviet Physics JETP volume 10 , pages 628 ( year 1960 )

    1960

  18. [26]

    Astrov , journal Sov

    author D. Astrov , journal Sov. Phys. JETP volume 11 , pages 708 ( year 1960 )

    1960

  19. [27]

    Krichevtsov , author V

    author B. Krichevtsov , author V. Pavlov , author R. Pisarev , and author V. Gridnev , journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter volume 5 , pages 8233 ( year 1993 )

    1993

  20. [28]

    Wu , author M

    author L. Wu , author M. Salehi , author N. Koirala , author J. Moon , author S. Oh , and author N. Armitage , journal Science volume 354 , pages 1124 ( year 2016 )

    2016

  21. [29]

    o ttcher , author G. Tkachov , author E. Hankiewicz , author C. Br \

    author V. Dziom , author A. Shuvaev , author A. Pimenov , author G. Astakhov , author C. Ames , author K. Bendias , author J. B \"o ttcher , author G. Tkachov , author E. Hankiewicz , author C. Br \"u ne , et al. , journal Nature communications volume 8 , pages 15197 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  22. [30]

    Varnava and author D

    author N. Varnava and author D. Vanderbilt , journal Physical Review B volume 98 , pages 245117 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  23. [31]

    author D. M. Nenno , author C. A. Garcia , author J. Gooth , author C. Felser , and author P. Narang , journal Nature Reviews Physics volume 2 , pages 682 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  24. [32]

    Sekine and author K

    author A. Sekine and author K. Nomura , journal Journal of Applied Physics volume 129 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  25. [33]

    author T. Z. Seidov and author M. A. Gorlach , journal Physical Review A volume 108 , pages 053515 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  26. [34]

    author D. J. Marsh , author K. C. Fong , author E. W. Lentz , author L. S mejkal , and author M. N. Ali , journal Physical Review Letters volume 123 , pages 121601 ( year 2019 )

    2019

  27. [35]

    Sch \"u tte-Engel , author D

    author J. Sch \"u tte-Engel , author D. J. Marsh , author A. J. Millar , author A. Sekine , author F. Chadha-Day , author S. Hoof , author M. N. Ali , author K. C. Fong , author E. Hardy , and author L. S mejkal , journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics volume 2...

    2021

  28. [36]

    Esposito and author S

    author A. Esposito and author S. Pavaskar , journal Physical Review D volume 108 , pages L011901 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  29. [37]

    author Y. K. Semertzidis and author S. Youn , journal Science Advances volume 8 , pages eabm9928 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  30. [38]

    Nitta , author T

    author T. Nitta , author T. Braine , author N. Du , author M. Guzzetti , author C. Hanretty , author G. Leum , author L. Rosenberg , author G. Rybka , author J. Sinnis , author J. Clarke , et al. , journal Physical review letters volume 131 , pages 101002 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  31. [39]

    author B. T. McAllister , author A. P. Quiskamp , and author M. E. Tobar , journal Physical Review D volume 109 , pages 015013 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  32. [40]

    Carosi , author C

    author G. Carosi , author C. Cisneros , author N. Du , author S. Durham , author N. Robertson , author C. Goodman , author M. Guzzetti , author C. Hanretty , author K. Enzian , author L. Rosenberg , et al. , journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07279 ( year 2025 )

    2025

  33. [41]

    author A. J. Millar , author G. G. Raffelt , author J. Redondo , and author F. D. Steffen , journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics volume 2017 , pages 061 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  34. [42]

    Caldwell , author G

    author A. Caldwell , author G. Dvali , author B. Majorovits , author A. Millar , author G. Raffelt , author J. Redondo , author O. Reimann , author F. Simon , author F. Steffen , and author M. W. Group) , journal Physical review letters volume 118 , pages 091801 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  35. [43]

    Ter c as , author J

    author H. Ter c as , author J. Rodrigues , and author J. Mendon c a , journal Physical Review Letters volume 120 , pages 181803 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  36. [44]

    Lawson , author A

    author M. Lawson , author A. J. Millar , author M. Pancaldi , author E. Vitagliano , and author F. Wilczek , journal Physical review letters volume 123 , pages 141802 ( year 2019 )

    2019

  37. [45]

    author A. J. Millar , author S. M. Anlage , author R. Balafendiev , author P. Belov , author K. Van Bibber , author J. Conrad , author M. Demarteau , author A. Droster , author K. Dunne , author A. G. Rosso , et al. , journal Physical Review D volume 107 , pages 055013 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  38. [46]

    Zioutas , author S

    author K. Zioutas , author S. Andriamonje , author V. Arsov , author S. Aune , author D. Autiero , author F. Avignone , author K. Barth , author A. Belov , author B. Beltr \'a n , author H. Br \"a uninger , et al. , journal Physical review letters volume 94 , pages 121301 ( ye...

    2005

  39. [47]

    Arik , author S

    author E. Arik , author S. Aune , author D. Autiero , author K. Barth , author A. Belov , author B. Beltr \'a n , author S. Borghi , author G. Bourlis , author F. Boydag , author H. Br \"a uninger , et al. , journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics volume 2009 , ...

    2009

  40. [48]

    Armengaud , author F

    author E. Armengaud , author F. Avignone , author M. Betz , author P. Brax , author P. Brun , author G. Cantatore , author J. Carmona , author G. Carosi , author F. Caspers , author S. Caspi , et al. , journal Journal of Instrumentation volume 9 , pages T05002 ( year 2014 )

    2014

  41. [49]

    Armengaud , author D

    author E. Armengaud , author D. Atti \'e , author S. Basso , author P. Brun , author N. Bykovskiy , author J. Carmona , author J. Castel , author S. Cebri \'a n , author M. Cicoli , author M. Civitani , et al. , journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics volume 201...

    2019

  42. [50]

    Galanti and author M

    author G. Galanti and author M. Roncadelli , journal Universe volume 8 , pages 253 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  43. [51]

    Murgui , author Y

    author C. Murgui , author Y. Wang , and author K. M. Zurek , journal Physics Letters B volume 855 , pages 138832 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  44. [52]

    Mie , journal Annalen der physik volume 330 , pages 377 ( year 1908 )

    author G. Mie , journal Annalen der physik volume 330 , pages 377 ( year 1908 )

    1908

  45. [53]

    author C. F. Bohren and author D. R. Huffman , title Absorption and scattering of light by small particles ( publisher John Wiley & Sons , year 2008 )

    2008

  46. [54]

    author J. D. Jackson , title Classical electrodynamics ( publisher John Wiley & Sons , year 2021 )

    2021

  47. [55]

    Stefanou , author V

    author N. Stefanou , author V. Yannopapas , and author A. Modinos , journal Computer physics communications volume 113 , pages 49 ( year 1998 )

    1998

  48. [56]

    Almpanis , author G

    author E. Almpanis , author G. Zouros , author P. Pantazopoulos , author K. Tsakmakidis , author N. Papanikolaou , and author N. Stefanou , journal Physical Review B volume 101 , pages 054412 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  49. [57]

    Almpanis , author G

    author E. Almpanis , author G. P. Zouros , and author N. Papanikolaou , in booktitle Optomagnonic Structures: Novel Architectures for Simultaneous Control of Light and Spin Waves ( publisher World Scientific , year 2021 ), pp. pages 243--297

    2021

  50. [58]

    Gantzounis , journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry C volume 113 , pages 21560 ( year 2009 )

    author G. Gantzounis , journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry C volume 113 , pages 21560 ( year 2009 )

    2009

  51. [59]

    author H. S. R ising , author B. Fraser , author S. M. Griffin , author S. Bandyopadhyay , author A. Mahabir , author S.-W. Cheong , and author A. V. Balatsky , journal Physical Review Research volume 3 , pages 033236 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  52. [60]

    Berlin and author T

    author A. Berlin and author T. Trickle , journal Physical Review Letters volume 132 , pages 181801 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  53. [61]

    author D. J. Griffiths , title Introduction to electrodynamics ( publisher Cambridge University Press , year 2023 )

    2023

  54. [62]

    Wilczek , journal Physical review letters volume 58 , pages 1799 ( year 1987 )

    author F. Wilczek , journal Physical review letters volume 58 , pages 1799 ( year 1987 )

    1987

  55. [63]

    Chigusa , author T

    author S. Chigusa , author T. Moroi , and author K. Nakayama , journal Physical Review D volume 101 , pages 096013 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  56. [64]

    Wolff , author M

    author C. Wolff , author M. Smith , author B. Stiller , and author C. Poulton , journal Journal of the Optical Society of America B volume 38 , pages 1243 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  57. [65]

    Gantzounis , author N

    author G. Gantzounis , author N. Papanikolaou , and author N. Stefanou , journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics volume 84 , pages 104303 ( year 2011 )

    2011

  58. [66]

    Almpanis , journal Physical Review B volume 97 , pages 184406 ( year 2018 )

    author E. Almpanis , journal Physical Review B volume 97 , pages 184406 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  59. [67]

    Stefanou , author P

    author I. Stefanou , author P. A. Pantazopoulos , and author N. Stefanou , journal Journal of the Optical Society of America B volume 38 , pages 407 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  60. [68]

    Panagiotidis , author E

    author E. Panagiotidis , author E. Almpanis , author N. Papanikolaou , and author N. Stefanou , journal Physical Review A volume 106 , pages 013524 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  61. [69]

    Haigh , author A

    author J. Haigh , author A. Nunnenkamp , author A. Ramsay , and author A. Ferguson , journal Physical review letters volume 117 , pages 133602 ( year 2016 )

    2016

  62. [70]

    Zhang , author N

    author X. Zhang , author N. Zhu , author C.-L. Zou , and author H. X. Tang , journal Physical review letters volume 117 , pages 123605 ( year 2016 )

    2016

  63. [71]

    Osada , author R

    author A. Osada , author R. Hisatomi , author A. Noguchi , author Y. Tabuchi , author R. Yamazaki , author K. Usami , author M. Sadgrove , author R. Yalla , author M. Nomura , and author Y. Nakamura , journal Physical review letters volume 116 , pages 223601 ( year 2016 )

    2016

  64. [72]

    Panagiotidis , author E

    author E. Panagiotidis , author E. Almpanis , author N. Papanikolaou , and author N. Stefanou , journal Advanced Optical Materials volume 11 , pages 2202812 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  65. [73]

    Geffrin , author B

    author J.-M. Geffrin , author B. Garc \' a-C \'a mara , author R. G \'o mez-Medina , author P. Albella , author L. Froufe-P \'e rez , author C. Eyraud , author A. Litman , author R. Vaillon , author F. Gonz \'a lez , author M. Nieto-Vesperinas , et al. , journal Nature communi...

    2012

  66. [74]

    Matsko , author A

    author A. Matsko , author A. Savchenkov , author D. Strekalov , author V. Ilchenko , and author L. Maleki , journal IPN Progress Report volume 42 , pages 1 ( year 2005 )

    2005

  67. [75]

    author R. G. Povey , author J. G. Hartnett , and author M. E. Tobar , journal Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology volume 82 , pages 052003 ( year 2010 )

    2010

  68. [76]

    Redondo and author A

    author J. Redondo and author A. Ringwald , journal Contemporary Physics volume 52 , pages 211 ( year 2011 )

    2011

  69. [77]

    Gninenko , journal Physical Review D volume 89 , pages 075008 ( year 2014 )

    author S. Gninenko , journal Physical Review D volume 89 , pages 075008 ( year 2014 )

    2014

  70. [78]

    author A. D. Spector , title Light-Shining-Through-Walls Experiments ( publisher Springer International Publishing , address Cham , year 2023 ), pp. pages 255--279 , ISBN isbn 978-3-030-95852-7 , ://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95852-7_9

    2023 doi

  71. [79]

    Serdyukov , author I

    author A. Serdyukov , author I. Semchenko , author S. Tretyakov , and author A. Sihvola ( year 2001 )

    2001

  72. [80]

    Christofi and author N

    author A. Christofi and author N. Stefanou , journal Physical Review B volume 97 , pages 125129 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  73. [81]

    author S. F. Koufidis , author T. T. Koutserimpas , author F. Monticone , and author M. W. McCall , journal Optical Materials Express volume 14 , pages 3006 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  74. [82]

    author F. R. Prudencio , author S. A. Matos , and author C. R. Paiva , journal IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques volume 62 , pages 1417 ( year 2014 )

    2014

  75. [83]

    Shaposhnikov , author M

    author L. Shaposhnikov , author M. Mazanov , author D. A. Bobylev , author F. Wilczek , and author M. A. Gorlach , journal Physical Review B volume 108 , pages 115101 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  76. [84]

    Safaei Jazi , author I

    author S. Safaei Jazi , author I. Faniayeu , author R. Cichelero , author D. C. Tzarouchis , author M. M. Asgari , author A. Dmitriev , author S. Fan , and author V. Asadchy , journal Nature Communications volume 15 , pages 1293 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  77. [85]

    Yang , author X

    author Q. Yang , author X. Wen , author Z. Li , author O. You , and author S. Zhang , journal Nature Communications volume 16 , pages 151 ( year 2025 )

    2025

  78. [86]

    author T. Z. Seidov and author M. A. Gorlach , journal Physical Review A volume 111 , pages 033521 ( year 2025 )

    2025

  79. [87]

    author S. S. Jazi , author I. Faniayeu , author R. Cichelero , author N. Kuznetsov , author S. van Dijken , author S. Fan , author A. Dmitriev , and author V. Asadchy , journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.22184 ( year 2025 )

    2025

  80. [88]

    Qi , author R

    author X.-L. Qi , author R. Li , author J. Zang , and author S.-C. Zhang , journal science volume 323 , pages 1184 ( year 2009 )

    2009

  81. [89]

    Barredo-Alamilla , author D

    author E. Barredo-Alamilla , author D. A. Bobylev , and author M. A. Gorlach , journal Physical Review B volume 109 , pages 195136 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  82. [90]

    author I. J. R. Aitchison and author N. E. Mavromatos , journal Contemporary physics volume 32 , pages 219 ( year 1991 )

    1991

  83. [91]

    Kashuba , author R

    author O. Kashuba , author R. Mummadavarapu , and author R.-P. Riwar , journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20835 ( year 2024 )

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Lin and author S

    author Q. Lin and author S. Fan , journal Physical Review X volume 4 , pages 031031 ( year 2014 )

    2014

  85. [93]

    author F. W. Hehl , author Y. N. Obukhov , author J.-P. Rivera , and author H. Schmid , journal The European Physical Journal B volume 71 , pages 321 ( year 2009 )

    2009

  86. [94]

    Ambj rn , author K

    author J. Ambj rn , author K. Anagnostopoulos , author U. Magnea , and author G. Thorleifsson , journal Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements volume 53 , pages 725 ( year 1997 a )

    1997

  87. [95]

    Ambj rn , author K

    author J. Ambj rn , author K. Anagnostopoulos , and author U. Magnea , journal Modern Physics Letters A volume 12 , pages 1605 ( year 1997 b )

    1997

  88. [96]

    Farakos and author N

    author K. Farakos and author N. Mavromatos , journal Physical Review B volume 57 , pages 3017 ( year 1998 )

    1998

  89. [97]

    Farakos , author G

    author K. Farakos , author G. Koutsoumbas , and author N. Mavromatos , journal International Journal of Modern Physics B volume 12 , pages 2475 ( year 1998 )

    1998

  90. [98]

    Paliovaios , author V

    author A. Paliovaios , author V. Achilleos , author G. Theocharis , author D. Frantzeskakis , and author N. Stefanou , journal Physical Review A volume 109 , pages 062229 ( year 2024 )

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.