Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 35 references

A Soft Robotic Module with Pneumatic Actuation and Enhanced Controllability Using a Shape Memory Alloy Wire

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A soft pneumatic bending module whose strain-limiting layer embeds a shape memory alloy wire reaches commanded angles with an average error of ±2 degrees instead of ±5 degrees, and its rise time drops from about 19 seconds to 3.

desk verdict A plausible incremental improvement in soft actuator control, but the headline numbers rest on a camera that the paper itself says needed recalibration after every test. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05741 v2 pith:YJISBRTW submitted 2025-06-06 cs.RO

Mohammadnavid Golchin This is my paper
classification cs.RO
keywords softroboticspneumaticactuatorshapememoryalloybendingcontrolstrain-limitinglayerfiber-reinforcedclosed-loopimageprocessing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a soft robotic bending module that combines pneumatic inflation with a shape memory alloy (SMA) wire embedded in its strain-limiting layer. The claim is that this hybrid actuation makes the module track commanded angles between 10 and 65 degrees with an average error of ±2 degrees and a rise time of about 3 seconds, compared with ±5 degrees and about 19 seconds for the same module without the wire. The author also reports that the SMA-equipped module reaches a 180-degree bend at a lower working pressure and without tearing, and that it is lighter than its pneumatic-only predecessor. If these results hold, they offer a simple way to make soft pneumatic actuators faster and more controllable without complex valves or modeling.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the smart strain-limiting layer: a thin silicone sheet with an embedded shape memory alloy wire, placed on the module's lower surface near the neutral plane and coated so the wire can slide inside the matrix without tearing the body. Replacing the passive inextensible bottom layer, this layer both blocks unwanted stretching and actively shortens when the wire is heated, adding a bending moment at reduced air pressure. The closed-loop controller measures the bend angle from a camera by thresholding the image into a polygon, converting it to a triangle, and applying the law of cosines; the angle error then opens or closes the pneumatic valve and switches the wire current on or off. The pressure needed for a desired angle is precomputed from the fiber-reinforced actuator model given in [22].

What would settle it

Repeat the 50-, 55-, 60-, and 65-degree step tests with both modules under fixed lighting while an independent motion-capture marker or rotary encoder records the true tip angle; if the independent sensor shows the hybrid module's error is not smaller than the pneumatic-only module's by the claimed margin, or if a single run without per-test calibration gives errors outside ±2 degrees, the central claim is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a shape memory alloy wire can serve as an active strain-limiting layer: when the wire contracts, it shortens the bottom of the module and adds a bending moment that the pneumatic chamber alone does not produce quickly. In the author's experiments, the developed module, actuated by compressed air and the wire together, reached commanded angles of 50, 55, 60, and 65 degrees with an average error of ±2 degrees and a rise time of about 3 seconds, while the pneumatic-only version of the same module showed ±5 degrees and about 19 seconds. The developed module also reached a bending angle of at least 180 degrees at a lower working pressure, without the body tearing observed in the pneumatic-only module at its maximum pressure. The paper concludes that the two actuators complement each other: compressed air supplies the gross bending power and the wire supplies precise, active correction of the final angle.

Load-bearing premise

The camera-based measurement of the bending angle is the only feedback and the only ruler for the reported errors, and the paper admits the image processing was sensitive to ambient light and required calibration after each test; if that measurement drifts during the 70-second trials, the reported ±2 degree error and 3 second rise time could be measurement artifacts rather than properties of the actuator.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same class of fiber-reinforced pneumatic bending actuators can be retrofitted with an SMA-based strain-limiting layer, reducing steady-state angle error from ±5 degrees to ±2 degrees without redesigning the body or control hardware.
  • Rise time to a commanded angle drops from about 19 seconds to 3 seconds, so hybrid actuation offers a path to faster soft grippers and manipulators for pick-and-place or rehabilitation tasks.
  • Because the SMA-equipped module reaches full bend at lower pressure, the working pressure and the risk of body tearing at high inflation are reduced, extending the actuator's service life at large angles.
  • The developed module is lighter (0.026 kg versus 0.032 kg) for the same single degree of freedom, which matters for wearable and untethered soft robots.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper leaves implicit: the SMA wire effectively gives the controller a second, high-bandwidth input, so the same architecture could compensate for hysteresis, creep, or load disturbances that pneumatic valves cannot track.
  • The reported error and rise time rest on a single camera measurement that the paper admits is sensitive to ambient light; an independent test with an external encoder or motion capture would show whether the ±2 degree figure is repeatable across trials and lighting conditions.
  • Because the wire is positioned near the neutral plane, the design may scale to longer or multi-segment modules: each segment could carry its own SMA layer and together form a continuum arm with per-segment angle control.
  • The comparison baseline is the author's own earlier module; applying the same SMA strain-limiting layer to a commercially available fiber-reinforced actuator would test whether the improvement transfers across fabrication batches.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a design modification of a fiber-reinforced soft pneumatic bending module in which the polypropylene strain-limiting layer is replaced by a 1-mm silicone matrix with an embedded shape-memory alloy (SMA) wire. A closed-loop controller uses a camera-based vision system for angle feedback and a pressure sensor/valve system for pneumatic actuation, with the SMA wire activated to assist the bending motion. The authors claim that the modified module reduces the average bending-angle error from ±5° to ±2° and the rise time from about 19 s to 3 s, based on 70-second trials at setpoints of 50°, 55°, 60°, and 65°. The paper further claims that the developed module reaches the same or larger bend angles at lower working pressure and that it weighs less than the original module. The conclusion presents the hybrid actuation as improving both positioning accuracy and response speed relative to the purely pneumatic first module.

Significance. If the quantitative claims survive scrutiny, the contribution is a simple, low-cost fabrication modification that improves both speed and accuracy of a common soft-actuator class, and the paper provides a reasonably detailed molding recipe that could be replicated by others. The comparison is between two physically fabricated devices rather than derived from fitted models, and the headline claims are quantitative and falsifiable. However, the current significance is undercut by the weakness of the supporting evidence: the error and rise-time numbers rest on single angle-time traces at four setpoints, measured by a camera system that the paper itself admits is sensitive to ambient light and requires recalibration after each test, with no independent ground truth. The claim of 'bend more with less working pressure' is not supported by any reported pressure-angle data. The incremental nature of the contribution relative to the author's own previously published SMA-spring module [35], which Table V reports as having ±0.85° error, is also not discussed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Figures 10-11 and Table V] The central quantitative claims—error reduced from ±5° to ±2° and rise time reduced from about 19 s to 3 s—are supported only by what appear to be single angle-time traces at four setpoints (50°, 55°, 60°, 65°). The paper reports no trial counts, no standard deviations or interquartile ranges, and no raw data for these traces. Because these numbers are the core evaluation, the authors should run repeated trials under controlled conditions and report the full distribution of the traces, or at minimum the mean and spread per condition and the number of runs, before the claimed improvement can be assessed.
  2. [Section III (Analysis and Results)] The same camera-based vision pipeline serves both as the feedback signal that the controller drives to zero and as the evaluation metric for the reported tracking error. The paper itself admits that this algorithm 'was susceptible to ambient light and required calibration after each test.' Under these conditions, a biased camera reading would be interpreted by the controller as a small error while the true angle is off by the same bias, so the reported ±2° error could be a measurement artifact. This is not a fitted-parameter circularity—no parameters are fitted in the comparison—but it is a measurement-validity concern that is load-bearing for the main claim. The authors should validate the vision system against an independent angle ground truth (for example, a manual protractor or an inertial sensor) and report calibration repeatability and lighting conditions during the trials.
  3. [Section III and Table V] The reported headline metrics are internally inconsistent and incomplete. For the first module, the text states that the module achieved the desired angle after 'approximately 20 seconds' with a 'delay time of around 14 seconds,' while the abstract and Table V give a rise time of 19 s; for the developed module, the conclusion states a rise time of 'less than 5 seconds' while the abstract says 3 s. Additionally, the abstract and Section III claim that the developed module reaches the same positions with less air pressure, but no pressure-angle measurements from the MPX2200GP sensor are reported anywhere in the results. Since both quantities are part of the central claim, the authors should reconcile the rise-time/delay-time terminology and report the measured pressure data.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II.C, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is dimensionally inconsistent as written because the symbol α appears on both sides of the equation; the side length should be labeled distinctly, for example α = cos⁻¹((b² + c² − a²)/(2bc)).
  2. [Section II.B] The statement that the SMA wire's location 'was considered to be the closest to the neutral plane of the module' appears contradictory to the stated goal of increasing the bending angle, since the bending moment produced by a contractile element scales with its distance from the neutral axis; please clarify the intended placement and its effect.
  3. [Section II.A and Table IV] The sentence 'SMA wires in the unactuated state can be stretched by 4% of their initial length by tolerating a force proportional to their diameter' is unclear, and it is not explained how the 1000-mm wire listed in Table IV is routed within the 175-mm module; please specify the pre-strain procedure and the routing geometry.
  4. [Section III (Analysis and Results)] The description of the image-processing measurement (color filter, thresholding, polygon formation, and conversion to a triangle) is too brief to be reproduced; please provide additional algorithmic detail or a reference.
  5. [Table V] The 'Second Module [35]' is listed in Table V with an error of ±0.85° and a rise time of 12 s, but no experimental data or description for this module appears in the present paper; please clarify whether the comparison is taken from the cited prior work, and note in the discussion that this previously reported module has a smaller error than the developed module.
  6. [References] Reference [27] contains a duplicated citation text within the bibliographic entry; the entry should be cleaned up.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claimed improvement is an empirical comparison of two physical modules under a fixed controller, with minor non-load-bearing self-citations and a self-referential sensor caveat.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that embedding an SMA wire in the strain-limiting layer improves bending-angle precision (error reduced from ±5° to ±2°) and cuts rise time from about 19 s to 3 s—is an experimental comparison between two fabricated physical modules, not a derivation from fitted parameters. Both modules are tested with the same closed-loop controller, the same camera, and the same 70-second protocol (Section II-C, Figs. 10–11), and the pressure setpoint is computed from Polygerinos et al.'s external model [22] (Eq. 2), so the comparison has independent content. Self-citations [23] and [35] supply the baseline modules and fabrication steps but are not load-bearing: the reported errors and rise times are measured in this paper, not imported from those citations. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is invoked from the author's prior work. The only self-referential feature is that the reported error eα = αdes − αdet (Eq. 3) is the same camera signal the controller is commanded to null ('if the error becomes zero or negative, the command to close the valve would be sent to the motor'), and the paper itself flags that the camera 'was susceptible to ambient light and required calibration after each test' (Section III). Consequently the ±2° figure is the closed-loop residual of the controller's own feedback signal, not an independent verification of physical bending accuracy; a sensor bias could be absorbed into the loop. This is a measurement-validity limitation that weakens the headline numbers, but it is not circular reasoning in the rubric's sense: no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and the claimed improvement rests on a comparison of two distinct actuators rather than an identity between input and output. Hence score 2, reflecting minor non-load-bearing self-citations plus the self-referential sensor caveat, with no circular derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not depend on newly invented entities or fitted parameters. The main unverified assumption is that the published pressure-bending model transfers to the new SMA-embedded module; the rest of the engineering is supported by standard materials data.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Polygerinos model [22] accurately predicts the pressure needed to achieve a desired bending angle in the fabricated module.
    Invoked in Section II-C, equation (2), without experimental validation of the model for the new geometry and materials.
  • standard math Beam theory neutral-axis placement of the SMA wire maximizes bending efficiency.
    Used in Section II-B to justify placing the SMA wire near the neutral plane; this is a standard result but the specific composite structure may not follow ideal beam behavior.
  • domain assumption Silicone and Kevlar manufacturer specifications (strain, modulus, etc.) are accurate.
    Tables II and III list material properties from [33] and [34]; the fabrication assumes these values for design without in-house characterization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Soft Robotic Module with Pneumatic Actuation and Enhanced Controllability Using a Shape Memory Alloy Wire." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YJISBRTW

@misc{pith2026250605741,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Soft Robotic Module with Pneumatic Actuation and Enhanced Controllability Using a Shape Memory Alloy Wire},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YJISBRTW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05741}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, a compressed air-actuated soft robotic module was developed by incorporating a shape memory alloy (SMA) wire into its structure to achieve the desired bending angle with greater precision. First, a fiber-reinforced bending module with a strain-limiting layer made of polypropylene was fabricated. The SMA wire was then placed in a silicon matrix, which was used as a new strain-limiting layer. A simple closed-loop control algorithm was used to regulate the bending angle of the soft robot within its workspace. A camera was utilized to measure the angular changes in the vertical plane. Different angles, ranging from 0 to 65 degrees, were covered to evaluate the performance of the module and the bending angle control algorithm. The experimental tests demonstrate that using the SMA wire results in more precise control of bending in the vertical plane. In addition, it is possible to bend more with less working pressure. The error range was reduced from an average of 5 degrees to 2 degrees, and the rise time was reduced from an average of 19 seconds to 3 seconds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05741 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The geometry schematic of the module consists of: 1) the bottom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A silicon matrix design that incorporates embedded shape memory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic of the molding steps: (a) represents the first molding process, (b) illustrates the setting of the strain-limiting layer and positioning the Kevlar fibers on the first mold, and (c) depicts the second molding process [23]. the neutral axis is the location where the normal stress is zero. In this case, a higher bending angle is achieved by actuating the SMA wire and producing very low strains. It should be … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The CAD model for real-time bending angles evaluation system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Front view of the module along the Y-axis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Bending angle control algorithm. camera. Different orientations of both soft robots from angles of 10 to 65 are shown, respectively. As can be seen, the camera detected different angles and both soft robots reached the desired bending angles as expected [PITH_FULL_IMA…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic representation of an experimental closed-loop system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Images captured from the camera show various orientations of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The bending angle evaluation results for both soft robotic modules [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    Improvement of bending movements in a pneumatically actuated smart robotic muscle using shape memory alloy,

    N. M. Golchin, A. Hadi, S. Saadat, B. Tarvirdizadeh, and K. Alipour, “Improvement of bending movements in a pneumatically actuated smart robotic muscle using shape memory alloy,” in *Proc. 1st Annu. Conf. Smart Mater. Struct.*, Qom, Iran, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://civilica.com/doc/1549103/

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [1]

    Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research,

    D. Trivedi, C. D. Rahn, W. M. Kier, and I. D. Walker, “Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research,” Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 99–117, 2008, doi: 10.1080/11762320802557865

    doi:10.1080/11762320802557865 2008

  3. [2]

    Soft robot review,

    C. Lee et al., “Soft robot review,” International Journal of Con- trol, Automation and Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s12555-016-0462-3

    doi:10.1007/s12555-016-0462-3 2017

  4. [3]

    Soft Robotics,

    G. M. Whitesides, “Soft Robotics,” Angewandte Chemie - In- ternational Edition, vol. 57, no. 16, pp. 4258–4273, 2018, doi: 10.1002/anie.201800907

    doi:10.1002/anie.201800907 2018

  5. [4]

    Soft robotics - The next indus- trial revolution? [Industrial Activities],

    J. Rossiter and H. Hauser, “Soft robotics - The next indus- trial revolution? [Industrial Activities],” IEEE Robotics and Au- tomation Magazine, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 17–20, 2016, doi: 10.1109/MRA.2016.2588018

    work page arXiv 2016

  6. [5]

    Fiber-Reinforced Soft Bending Actuator Control Utilizing On/Off Valves,

    C. Chen, W. Tang, Y . Hu, Y . Lin, and J. Zou, “Fiber-Reinforced Soft Bending Actuator Control Utilizing On/Off Valves,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 6732–6739, 2020, doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3015189

    arXiv 2020

  7. [6]

    Electronic Muscles and Skins: A Review of Soft Sensors and Actuators,

    D. Chen and Q. Pei, “Electronic Muscles and Skins: A Review of Soft Sensors and Actuators,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 117, no. 17, pp. 11239–11268, 2017, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00019

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00019 2017

  8. [7]

    The high potential of shape memory alloys in developing miniature mechanical devices: A review on shape memory alloy mini-actuators,

    A. Nespoli, S. Besseghini, S. Pittaccio, E. Villa, and S. Viscuso, “The high potential of shape memory alloys in developing miniature mechanical devices: A review on shape memory alloy mini-actuators,” Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 149–160, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2009.12.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sna.2009.12.020 2010

Show all 35 references
  1. [8]

    Review of biomimetic underwater robots using smart actuators,

    W. S. Chu et al., “Review of biomimetic underwater robots using smart actuators,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manu- facturing, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1281–1292, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s12541- 012-0171-7

    2012 doi

  2. [9]

    A re- view of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportu- nities,

    J. Mohd Jani, M. Leary, A. Subic, and M. A. Gibson, “A re- view of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportu- nities,” Materials and Design, vol. 56, pp. 1078–1113, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.084

    2014 doi

  3. [10]

    One-dimensional constitutive behavior of shape mem- ory alloys: Thermomechanical derivation with non-constant material functions and redefined martensite internal variable,

    L. C. Brinson, “One-dimensional constitutive behavior of shape mem- ory alloys: Thermomechanical derivation with non-constant material functions and redefined martensite internal variable,” Journal of Intel- ligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 229–242, 1...

    1993 doi

  4. [11]

    Modeling and experimental characteriza- tion of the stress, strain, and resistance of shape memory alloy actuator wires with controlled power input,

    S. J. Furst and S. Seelecke, “Modeling and experimental characteriza- tion of the stress, strain, and resistance of shape memory alloy actuator wires with controlled power input,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1233–1247, 2012, doi...

    2012 doi

  5. [12]

    Large bending actuator made with SMA contractile wires: Theory, numerical simulation and experiments,

    U. Icardi, “Large bending actuator made with SMA contractile wires: Theory, numerical simulation and experiments,” Composites Part B:Engineering, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 259–267, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S1359- 8368(00)00062-7

    2001 doi

  6. [13]

    Design, prototyping and computer simulations of a novel large bending actuator made with a shape memory alloy contractile wire,

    G. Wang and M. Shahinpoor, “Design, prototyping and computer simulations of a novel large bending actuator made with a shape memory alloy contractile wire,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 214–221, 1997, doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/6/2/011

    1997 doi

  7. [14]

    Dy- namic characteristics of planar bending actuator embedded with shape memory alloy,

    Y . Du, B. Liu, M. Xu, E. Dong, S. Zhang, and J. Yang, “Dy- namic characteristics of planar bending actuator embedded with shape memory alloy,” Mechatronics, vol. 25, pp. 18–26, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2014.11.001

    2015 doi

  8. [15]

    Design and analysis of a smart soft composite structure for various modes of actuation,

    S. H. Song, H. Lee, J. G. Lee, J. Y . Lee, M. Cho, and S. H. Ahn, “Design and analysis of a smart soft composite structure for various modes of actuation,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 95, pp. 155–165, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.087

    2016 doi

  9. [16]

    Modeling and experimental character- ization of SMA torsional actuators,

    H. Prahlad and I. Chopra, “Modeling and experimental character- ization of SMA torsional actuators,” Journal of Intelligent Mate- rial Systems and Structures, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2007, doi: 10.1177/1045389X06064349

    2007 doi

  10. [17]

    Development of flexible mi- croactuator and its applications to robotic mechanisms,

    K. Suzumori, S. Iikura, and H. Tanaka, “Development of flexible mi- croactuator and its applications to robotic mechanisms,” Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, no. April, pp. 1622–1627, 1991, doi: 10.1109/robot.1991.131850

    1991

  11. [18]

    Developing a novel continuum module actuated by shape memory alloys,

    A. Hadi, H. Akbari, B. Tarvirdizadeh, and K. Alipour, “Developing a novel continuum module actuated by shape memory alloys,” Sen- sors and Actuators, A: Physical, vol. 243, pp. 90–102, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2016.03.019

    2016 doi

  12. [19]

    Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly,

    B. Mosadegh et al., “Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 2163–2170, 2014, doi: 10.1002/adfm.201303288

    2014 doi

  13. [20]

    A Tendon- Driven, Preloaded, Pneumatically Actuated, Soft Robotic Gripper with a Telescopic Palm,

    J. Meng, L. Gerez, J. Chapman, and M. Liarokapis, “A Tendon- Driven, Preloaded, Pneumatically Actuated, Soft Robotic Gripper with a Telescopic Palm,” 2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics, RoboSoft 2020, pp. 476–481, 2020, doi: 10.1109/Ro- boSoft48309.2020.9115986

    2020

  14. [21]

    Long Shape Memory Alloy Tendon-based Soft Robotic Actuators and Implementation as a Soft Gripper,

    J. H. Lee, Y . S. Chung, and H. Rodrigue, “Long Shape Memory Alloy Tendon-based Soft Robotic Actuators and Implementation as a Soft Gripper,” Sci Rep, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 11251, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41598- 019-47794-1

    2019 doi

  15. [22]

    Modeling of Soft Fiber-Reinforced Bending Ac- tuators,

    P. Polygerinos et al., “Modeling of Soft Fiber-Reinforced Bending Ac- tuators,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 778–789, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TRO.2015.2428504

    2015

  16. [23]

    Development of A New Soft Robotic Module Using Compressed Air and Shape Memory Alloys,

    M. N. Golchin, A. Hadi, and B. Tarvirdizadeh, “Development of A New Soft Robotic Module Using Compressed Air and Shape Memory Alloys,” 2021, no. IEEE, pp. 517–522. doi: 10.1109/ICRoM54204.2021.9663519

    2021

  17. [24]

    Experimental Char- acterisation of Hydraulic Fiber-Reinforced Soft Actuators for Worm- Like Robots,

    M. S. Xavier, A. J. Fleming, and Y . K. Yong, “Experimental Char- acterisation of Hydraulic Fiber-Reinforced Soft Actuators for Worm- Like Robots,” 2019 IEEE 7th International Conference on Control, Mechatronics and Automation, ICCMA 2019, no. c, pp. 204–209, 2019, doi: 10.110...

    2019

  18. [25]

    Soft Fiber-Reinforced Pneumatic Actuator Design and Fabrication: Towards Robust, Soft Robotic Systems,

    J. Fras and K. Althoefer, “Soft Fiber-Reinforced Pneumatic Actuator Design and Fabrication: Towards Robust, Soft Robotic Systems,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 11649 L...

    2019 doi

  19. [26]

    Experimental and numerical analysis on the bending response of the geometrically gradient soft robotics actuator,

    S. Dilibal, H. Sahin, and Y . Celik, “Experimental and numerical analysis on the bending response of the geometrically gradient soft robotics actuator,” Archives of Mechanics, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 391–404, 2018, doi: 10.24423/aom.2903

    2018 doi

  20. [27]

    Rus and M

    D. Rus and M. T. Tolley, “Design, fabrication and control of soft robots[1] D. Rus and M. T. Tolley, ‘Design, fabrication and control of soft robots,’ Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 467–475, 2015, doi: 10.1038/nature14543.,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 467–475, 2015, doi:...

    2015 doi

  21. [28]

    A recipe for soft fluidic elastomer robots,

    A. D. Marchese, R. K. Katzschmann, and D. Rus, “A recipe for soft fluidic elastomer robots,” Soft Robotics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–25, 2015, doi: 10.1089/soro.2014.0022

    2015

  22. [29]

    Soft Robotics: A Perspective - Current Trends and Prospects for the Future,

    C. Majidi, “Soft Robotics: A Perspective - Current Trends and Prospects for the Future,” Soft Robotics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 2014, doi: 10.1089/soro.2013.0001

    2014

  23. [30]

    Soft Robotic Grippers for Biological Sampling on Deep Reefs,

    K. C. Galloway et al., “Soft Robotic Grippers for Biological Sampling on Deep Reefs,” Soft Robotics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2016, doi: 10.1089/soro.2015.0019

    2016

  24. [31]

    A Resilient, Untethered Soft Robot,

    M. T. Tolley et al., “A Resilient, Untethered Soft Robot,” Soft Robotics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 213–223, 2014, doi: 10.1089/soro.2014.0008

    2014

  25. [32]

    Sehanobish, Engineering Plastics and Plastic Composites in Auto- motive Applications

    K. Sehanobish, Engineering Plastics and Plastic Composites in Auto- motive Applications. 2009. doi: 10.4271/t-122

    2009 doi

  26. [33]

    Dragon Skin Technical Bulletin,

    Smooth-On, “Dragon Skin Technical Bulletin,” 2012

    2012

  27. [34]

    Puttegowda, S

    M. Puttegowda, S. M. Rangappa, M. Jawaid, P. Shivanna, Y . Basave- gowda, and N. Saba, Potential of natural/synthetic hybrid composites for aerospace applications. Elsevier Ltd, 2018. doi: 10.1016/B978-0- 08-102131-6.00021-9

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.