Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Regge trajectories, detectors, and distributions in the critical ${\rm O}(N)$ model

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper computes the anomalous spin of the BFKL-type horizontal Regge trajectory in the critical O(N) model at leading order in 1/N and shows that the same function controls PDF moments, collinear-function evolution, and Bethe-Salpeter…

desk verdict Solid, cross-checked O(N) generalization of the detector program whose central formula (4.40) carries a repairable prefactor typo and whose new BFKL spin rests on a partially justified mixing assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06419 v2 pith:QQ34HVUX submitted 2025-06-06 hep-th hep-ph

Yue-Zhou Li , David Simmons-Duffin This is my paper
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords light-rayoperatorsReggetrajectoriesBFKLtrajectorycriticalO(N)modellarge-NexpansionpartondistributionfunctionsrapidityrenormalizationBethe-Salpeterresummation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies light-ray operators in the critical O(N) vector model at large N, separating them by conformal frame: detector operators at null infinity, which measure final-state event shapes, and distribution operators whose forward matrix elements define parton distribution functions and collinear functions. Its central new result is the anomalous spin of the leading horizontal (BFKL-type) Regge trajectory, γ_BFKL(J_L) = (C_σ/(N(4π)^d)) κ_0(J_L), extracted by renormalizing a one-parameter family of horizontal detectors at leading order in 1/N. The identical function appears in the rapidity evolution of the collinear function and in the singularity structure of the Bethe-Salpeter resummation of the four-point function, so three independent routes converge on the same Regge data. The paper also resolves the mixing of the leading-twist trajectory with its shadow to obtain the Regge intercept, reproduces the known leading-twist anomalous dimensions and splitting function from distribution operators, and identifies forward matrix elements of distribution operators with moments of PDFs. A sympathetic reader should care because this provides the first concrete, parameter-free description of BFKL-type Regge physics in a strongly interacting but large-N-tractable CFT, with an explicit dictionary to QCD objects.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the BFKL-type horizontal light-ray operator, defined in the detector frame as the special family H_{J_L,BFKL} with labels J_{L1} = J_{L2} = 3−d (Eqs. 3.15–3.18) and in the distribution frame as the projected product of two light-transforms of σ (Eq. 3.23). The calculation's engine is the kernel K_α, a conformal four-point function on the (d−2)-dimensional celestial sphere whose eigenvalue κ_α(J_L) is extracted with the Lorentzian inversion formula (Eqs. 4.36–4.37); setting α = 0 and projecting with a conformal three-point function selects the multiplicatively renormalized direction and yields γ_BFKL. In the distribution frame the same eigenvalue diagonalizes the transverse BFKL kernel K^⊥_0 (Eq. 5.26), and in the Bethe-Salpeter analysis the analogous kernel K_BFKL is diagonalized by harmonic analysis with the same conformal machinery (Eqs. 6.18–6.19). The reciprocity relation γ_L(J_L) = γ(Δ − 2Δ_φ − γ_L(J_L)) (Eq. 3.14) is what ties the frames together, expressing that a dilatation in the detector frame is a boost in the distribution frame.

What would settle it

Compute the leading Regge pole of the ⟨σσσσ⟩ four-point function from the Bethe-Salpeter series (6.17)–(6.21) at the next order in 1/N and check whether the pole sits at J = −1 + (C_σ²/(N(4π)^d)) κ_0(1−Δ); alternatively, repeat the operator renormalization of Section 4 including the disconnected diagrams of Fig. 12 and the full mixing space of Appendix C and verify that the eigenvalue γ_BFKL(J_L) is unchanged. If either check fails, the claimed anomalous spin is not the physical one.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the leading horizontal trajectory of light-ray operators in the critical O(N) model carries a computable anomalous spin at leading order in 1/N: γ_BFKL(J_L) = (C_σ/(N(4π)^d)) κ_0(J_L) (Eq. 4.40), where κ_0(J_L) is an explicit function of the light-ray spin J_L obtained by diagonalizing a celestial-sphere kernel. The same function governs the rapidity evolution of the collinear function in the distribution frame, ν d/dν H_{Δ,BFKL} = −(C_σ²/(N(4π)^d)) κ_0(1−Δ) H_{Δ,BFKL} (Eq. 5.27), and appears as the shift of the Regge singularity J = −1 + (C_σ²/(N(4π)^d)) κ_0(1−Δ) in the Bethe-Salpeter resummation of ⟨σσσσ⟩ (Eq. 6.21). Alongside this, the paper establishes that forward matrix elements of leading-twist distribution operators are moments of PDFs (Eq. 3.29), and that renormalizing those operators yields the leading-twist splitting function and the known anomalous dimensions, while resolving leading-twist/shadow mixing yields the Regge intercepts (2.9) that match earlier computations. The paper's picture is that detector and distribution operators are the same light-ray operators seen in two conformal frames, so the same Regge data must appear whichever frame one uses.

Load-bearing premise

The central calculation assumes that, at leading order in 1/N, exactly one one-parameter family of horizontal light-ray operators renormalizes multiplicatively, and that disconnected diagrams and mixing with other horizontal operators and the σσ trajectory do not shift the eigenvalue; if other multiplicative combinations exist, the extracted γ_BFKL is not the physical anomalous spin.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The leading horizontal trajectory near J = −1 in the critical O(N) model acquires a definite, computable anomalous spin at leading order in 1/N, so the Chew-Frautschi plot in that region is quantitatively fixed rather than schematic.
  • Forward matrix elements of leading-twist distribution operators are the moments of parton distribution functions, so PDF renormalization in this theory follows directly from light-ray operator renormalization.
  • The same BFKL-type function governs the detector-frame renormalization, the rapidity evolution of collinear functions, and the singularity of the Bethe-Salpeter resummation, providing three independent routes to the same Regge data.
  • The detector-frame and distribution-frame computations agree through the reciprocity relation, confirming that conformal-frame equivalence survives renormalization in this model.
  • The resolved pomeron/shadow mixing reproduces the known Regge intercepts, connecting the operator-level picture to existing conformal bootstrap data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the central claim is right, the same eigenvalue should control the full 1/N-resummed Regge limit of the ⟨σσσσ⟩ correlator, so the pole position (6.21) can be checked directly against the Bethe-Salpeter series rather than by renormalizing operators.
  • The distribution-frame dictionary suggests a natural next target: transverse-momentum-dependent matrix elements, where the transverse-plane conformal projection would be replaced by a transverse-momentum kernel, extending the PDF/collinear-function identification to TMD-type objects.
  • The unresolved singularity at d = 5 in the horizontal-operator mixing space (Appendix C) may signal that the BFKL eigenstate mixes with additional operators exactly there; a dedicated multi-operator analysis near d = 5 would show whether γ_BFKL receives corrections in that region.
  • The reciprocity relation (3.14) applied to the BFKL trajectory predicts a specific timelike anomalous dimension; computing it at next order in 1/N in the detector frame would be a sharp independent consistency check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a light-ray operator formalism for detector and distribution operators in the critical O(N) model at leading order in the 1/N expansion. It renormalizes leading-twist detectors, resolves shadow mixing to extract the Regge intercept, identifies a BFKL-type horizontal trajectory with anomalous spin gamma_BFKL(J_L), and connects distribution operators to PDFs and collinear functions. The same anomalous spin is reproduced from the Bethe-Salpeter resummation of conformal four-point functions. The results are extensively cross-checked against known leading-twist anomalous dimensions and Regge intercepts.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper provides a rare nonperturbative large-N example in which BFKL-type light-ray operators are explicitly constructed and renormalized in a CFT, with consistent results from detector, distribution, and Bethe-Salpeter perspectives. The dictionary between distribution operators and PDFs/collinear functions is a useful bridge between CFT light-ray technology and QCD factorization objects. The computations are parameter-free at leading order in 1/N and include explicit checks against known anomalous dimensions (Eqs. 2.6, 4.11, 4.14) and a d=4 limit matching previous results. These strengths make the central framework credible despite the issues below.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.3, Eq. (4.40)] The displayed second equality in Eq. (4.40) is algebraically incorrect. Using C_sigma as defined in Eq. (2.4), the prefactor 2^{2d-5}(1 - cos(pi d)) Gamma((d-1)/2)^2 / pi^3 equals C_sigma^2/(N(4 pi)^d) kappa_0(J_L), not C_sigma/(N(4 pi)^d) kappa_0(J_L). For d=3 the correct prefactor is 4/(pi^3 N), while C_sigma/(4 pi)^3 = -1/(4 pi^3), so both the magnitude and the sign are wrong as printed. Since Eqs. (5.27) and (6.21) consistently use C_sigma^2, this is an internal inconsistency in the central result; if the displayed C_sigma is a typo for C_sigma^2, the derivation is repairable, but the correction is necessary.
  2. [Section 4.3 and Appendix C] The extraction of gamma_BFKL assumes that H_{3-d,3-d,J_L} is the unique multiplicatively renormalized horizontal family and that the disconnected diagrams of Fig. 12 do not shift the eigenvalue. Appendix C exhibits a larger mixing space (H^(1), H^(2)) and reports a singularity of the dilatation operator at d=5, while Section 7 acknowledges an unresolved triple intersection involving the BFKL trajectory and the [sigma sigma] trajectory. The manuscript should state explicitly whether the triangular structure of Eqs. (C.4) and (C.7) protects the BFKL eigenvalue from these mixings, and should specify the domain of validity of Eq. (4.40) near d=5. A concrete check would be to retain the disconnected diagrams in the renormalization of H_{3-d,3-d,J_L} and verify that no first-row off-diagonal entries appear in the full dilatation matrix.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1, after Eq. (4.1)] There is a typo: 'represnentations' should be 'representations'.
  2. [Section 3.3.2, Eq. (3.35)] There is a typo: 'Fouerier space' should be 'Fourier space'.
  3. [Section 3.2.2] There is a typo: 'opersators' should be 'operators'.
  4. [Section 5.2, Eqs. (5.23) and (5.27)] The factor pi^{d-2} appears inside the integral in Eq. (5.23) but is not explicitly accounted for in Eq. (5.27); the authors should clarify whether it is absorbed into the normalization of the kernel or into the definition of kappa_0.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 1/N O(N) calculation is first-principles, with known Regge data used as consistency checks and [59] supplying technique rather than the asserted result.

full rationale

The paper's central new quantity, gamma_BFKL(J_L), is obtained by an explicit leading-order-in-1/N renormalization of the horizontal detector H_{JL1,JL2,JL}; Eq. (4.38) shows that the divergent one-loop matrix element is proportional to the tree-level matrix element of H_{3-d,3-d,J_L}, and the eigenvalue kappa_0(J_L) is computed in Appendix B.2 by diagonalizing the kernel K_alpha with the Lorentzian inversion formula. No parameter is fitted and no target value is inserted. The same function then appears from an independent collinear-function calculation, Eqs. (5.23)-(5.27), and from the Bethe-Salpeter resummation, Eqs. (6.17)-(6.21), so the three derivations corroborate rather than assume one another. The Regge intercept in Section 4.2 is obtained by diagonalizing the explicit 2x2 renormalization matrix and then checked against the earlier quoted result (2.9); this is a consistency check, not an input. The identifications of distribution-operator matrix elements with PDF moments and collinear functions, Eqs. (3.29) and (3.35), are dictionary relations between definitions and Fourier/Mellin transforms, not fitted predictions. Although the framework of detector renormalization and horizontal trajectories is adapted from [59], which shares an author, the O(N) diagrams, kernels, and anomalous dimensions are computed in this paper, and no uniqueness claim is imported solely by citation. Two non-circular caveats should be noted: Eq. (4.40)'s displayed simplification to C_sigma/(4 pi)^d is algebraically inconsistent with C_sigma defined in (2.4) and with the C_sigma^2 coefficients in (5.27) and (6.21), and Appendix C identifies additional mixing and an unresolved singularity at d=5. These are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the standard large-N description of the O(N) model, the validity of the 1/N expansion for Regge trajectories, the shadow-transform and reciprocity relations of CFT, and a specific regularization scheme for the σ propagator. No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The critical O(N) vector model in the large-N limit is described by the effective action (2.2) with the σ propagator (2.3) for 3 ≤ d < 6, excluding d=4.
    Section 2.1. This is the standard large-N description of the critical O(N) model, analytically continued to d<6.
  • domain assumption The 1/N expansion is a valid perturbative expansion for the Regge trajectories, and leading-order renormalization captures the physics of the leading and horizontal trajectories.
    Throughout the paper, the authors retain only leading order in 1/N and assume the resulting renormalization group equations describe the actual trajectories.
  • standard math The shadow transform and the reciprocity relation (3.14) connect the detector and distribution frames, and the light-ray OPE and Lorentzian inversion formula apply to the non-local operators.
    Sections 3.1, 3.2, B. These are established results in conformal field theory.
  • ad hoc to paper The regularization scheme with Δ_σ → 2-ϵ and subtraction of poles in ϵ before taking ϵ→0 yields finite, scheme-independent results at leading order.
    Appendix A. A standard but technically involved regulator for the σ propagator in generic dimension.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regge trajectories, detectors, and distributions in the critical ${\rm O}(N)$ model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QQ34HVUX

@misc{pith2026250606419,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regge trajectories, detectors, and distributions in the critical $\rm O(N)$ model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QQ34HVUX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06419}
}
abstract

We explore light-ray operators in the critical O$(N)$ model in the large-$N$ limit, focusing on leading-twist and leading ``horizontal" trajectories. We distinguish between light-ray operators in two conformal frames: detector operators, which characterize event shapes of final states, and distribution operators, which probe initial-state distributions. In particular, we identify parton distribution functions (PDFs) and collinear functions as matrix elements of appropriate distribution operators. We renormalize some simple detector operators at leading order in $1/N$, allowing us to extract the Regge intercept and the anomalous spin of the leading horizontal trajectory. We furthermore renormalize distribution versions of these operators, obtaining the leading-twist splitting function and a BFKL-type kernel, which match results from the detector frame. Finally, we show how these results can be read off from OPE data encoded in the Bethe-Salpeter resummation of conformal four-point functions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Infinite Symmetry Algebras in Four-Dimensional Conformal Field Theories

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Universal light-ray operators from the stress tensor generate the wedge subalgebra of w_{1+∞} in generic interacting 4D CFTs, with finite one-point functions matching the full tower of soft graviton and gluon factors.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [59]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Meltzer and D. Simmons-Duffin, Detectors in weakly-coupled field theories, JHEP 04 (2023) 014, [ 2209.00008]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    L. N. Lipatov, The parton model and perturbation theory , Yad. Fiz. 20 (1974) 181–198

    1974

  3. [2]

    Altarelli and G

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language, Nucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 298–318

    1977

  4. [3]

    G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Exclusive Processes in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2157

    1980

  5. [4]

    J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Parton Distribution and Decay Functions , Nucl. Phys. B 194 (1982) 445–492

    1982

  6. [5]

    V. L. Chernyak and A. R. Zhitnitsky, Asymptotic Behavior of Exclusive Processes in QCD , Phys. Rept. 112 (1984) 173

    1984

  7. [6]

    Mankiewicz, G

    L. Mankiewicz, G. Piller and T. Weigl, Hard exclusive meson production and nonforward parton distributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 5 (1998) 119–128, [ hep-ph/9711227]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [7]

    Geyer, M

    B. Geyer, M. Lazar and D. Robaschik, Decomposition of nonlocal light cone operators into harmonic operators of definite twist , Nucl. Phys. B 559 (1999) 339–377, [ hep-th/9901090]

    arXiv 1999

Show all 147 references
  1. [8]

    Geyer, D

    B. Geyer, D. Robaschik and D. Mueller, Light ray operators and their application in QCD , in Workshop on Quantum Field Theory Theoretical Aspects of High-energy Physics , pp. 54–63, 5,

  2. [9]

    M¨ uller, D

    D. M¨ uller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F. M. Dittes and J. Hoˇ rejˇ si,Wave functions, evolution equations and evolution kernels from light ray operators of QCD , Fortsch. Phys. 42 (1994) 101–141, [hep-ph/9812448]

    1994 arXiv

  3. [10]

    I. I. Balitsky and V. M. Braun, Evolution Equations for QCD String Operators , Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1989) 541–584

    1989

  4. [11]

    Balitsky, High-energy QCD and Wilson lines , hep-ph/0101042

    I. Balitsky, High-energy QCD and Wilson lines , hep-ph/0101042

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    Andrei et al., Boundary and Defect CFT: Open Problems and Applications , J

    N. Andrei et al., Boundary and Defect CFT: Open Problems and Applications , J. Phys. A 53 (2020) 453002, [ 1810.05697]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [13]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis and S. T. Love, Energy Correlations in electron-Positron Annihilation in Quantum Chromodynamics: Asymptotically Free Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. D 19 (1979) 2018

    1979

  7. [14]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis and S. T. Love, Energy Correlations in electron - Positron Annihilation: Testing QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 (1978) 1585

    1978

  8. [15]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis and S. T. Love, Energy Correlations in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics: A Conjecture for All Orders , Phys. Lett. B 85 (1979) 297–299

    1979

  9. [16]

    D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations , JHEP 05 (2008) 012, [ 0803.1467]

    2008 arXiv

  10. [17]

    N. A. Sveshnikov and F. V. Tkachov, Jets and quantum field theory , Phys. Lett. B 382 (1996) 403–408, [hep-ph/9512370]

    1996 arXiv

  11. [18]

    F. V. Tkachov, Measuring multi - jet structure of hadronic energy flow or What is a jet? , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12 (1997) 5411–5529, [ hep-ph/9601308]. – 53 –

    1997 arXiv

  12. [19]

    G. P. Korchemsky and G. F. Sterman, Power corrections to event shapes and factorization , Nucl. Phys. B 555 (1999) 335–351, [ hep-ph/9902341]

    1999 arXiv

  13. [20]

    A. J. Larkoski, G. P. Salam and J. Thaler, Energy Correlation Functions for Jet Substructure , JHEP 06 (2013) 108, [ 1305.0007]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [21]

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev and A. Zhiboedov, From correlation functions to event shapes , Nucl. Phys. B 884 (2014) 305–343, [ 1309.0769]

    2014 arXiv

  15. [22]

    K. Lee, B. Me¸ caj and I. Moult, Conformal collider physics meets LHC data , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) L011502, [ 2205.03414]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [23]

    P. T. Komiske, I. Moult, J. Thaler and H. X. Zhu, Analyzing N-Point Energy Correlators inside Jets with CMS Open Data , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 051901, [ 2201.07800]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Hayrapetyan et al., Measurement of Energy Correlators inside Jets and Determination of the Strong Coupling αS(mZ), Phys

    CMS collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Measurement of Energy Correlators inside Jets and Determination of the Strong Coupling αS(mZ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 071903, [2402.13864]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [25]

    L. H. Ford and T. A. Roman, Averaged energy conditions and quantum inequalities , Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 4277–4286, [ gr-qc/9410043]

    1995 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Hartman, S

    T. Hartman, S. Kundu and A. Tajdini, Averaged Null Energy Condition from Causality , JHEP 07 (2017) 066, [ 1610.05308]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Faulkner, R

    T. Faulkner, R. G. Leigh, O. Parrikar and H. Wang, Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition , JHEP 09 (2016) 038, [ 1605.08072]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [28]

    X. O. Camanho, J. D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling , JHEP 02 (2016) 020, [ 1407.5597]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Buchel, J

    A. Buchel, J. Escobedo, R. C. Myers, M. F. Paulos, A. Sinha and M. Smolkin, Holographic GB gravity in arbitrary dimensions , JHEP 03 (2010) 111, [ 0911.4257]

    2010 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Kologlu, P

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov, Shocks, Superconvergence, and a Stringy Equivalence Principle , JHEP 11 (2020) 096, [ 1904.05905]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [31]

    H. Chen, R. Karlsson and A. Zhiboedov, Energy correlations and Planckian collisions , 2404.15056

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Hartman, S

    T. Hartman, S. Jain and S. Kundu, Causality Constraints in Conformal Field Theory , JHEP 05 (2016) 099, [ 1509.00014]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Hartman, S

    T. Hartman, S. Jain and S. Kundu, A New Spin on Causality Constraints , JHEP 10 (2016) 141, [1601.07904]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Afkhami-Jeddi, T

    N. Afkhami-Jeddi, T. Hartman, S. Kundu and A. Tajdini, Shockwaves from the Operator Product Expansion, JHEP 03 (2019) 201, [ 1709.03597]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Kravchuk and D

    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, Light-ray operators in conformal field theory , JHEP 11 (2018) 102, [ 1805.00098]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [36]

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev and A. Zhiboedov, Energy-Energy Correlations in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 071601, [ 1311.6800]. – 54 –

    2014 arXiv

  30. [37]

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev and A. Zhiboedov, Event shapes in N = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 884 (2014) 206–256, [ 1309.1424]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [38]

    J. M. Henn, E. Sokatchev, K. Yan and A. Zhiboedov, Energy-energy correlation in N =4 super Yang-Mills theory at next-to-next-to-leading order , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 036010, [1903.05314]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Hartman and G

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys, Averaged null energy and the renormalization group , JHEP 12 (2023) 139, [ 2309.14409]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Hartman and G

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys, Null energy constraints on two-dimensional RG flows , JHEP 01 (2024) 102, [ 2310.15217]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Hartman and G

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys, Light-ray sum rules and the c-anomaly , JHEP 08 (2024) 008, [2405.10137]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Moult and H

    I. Moult and H. X. Zhu, Energy Correlators: A Journey From Theory to Experiment , 2506.09119

    arXiv

  36. [43]

    Caron-Huot, Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories , JHEP 09 (2017) 078, [1703.00278]

    S. Caron-Huot, Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories , JHEP 09 (2017) 078, [1703.00278]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Simmons-Duffin, D

    D. Simmons-Duffin, D. Stanford and E. Witten, A spacetime derivation of the Lorentzian OPE inversion formula , JHEP 07 (2018) 085, [ 1711.03816]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [45]

    M. S. Costa, V. Goncalves and J. Penedones, Conformal Regge theory, JHEP 12 (2012) 091, [1209.4355]

    2012 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Caron-Huot and J

    S. Caron-Huot and J. Sandor, Conformal Regge Theory at Finite Boost , JHEP 05 (2021) 059, [2008.11759]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Homrich, D

    A. Homrich, D. Simmons-Duffin and P. Vieira, Multitwist Trajectories and Decoupling Zeros in Conformal Field Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 011602, [ 2211.13754]

    2025 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Homrich, D

    A. Homrich, D. Simmons-Duffin and P. Vieira, Light-ray wave functions and integrability , JHEP 10 (2024) 125, [ 2409.02160]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Kologlu, P

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov, The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders, JHEP 01 (2021) 128, [ 1905.01311]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Chen, M.-X

    H. Chen, M.-X. Luo, I. Moult, T.-Z. Yang, X. Zhang and H. X. Zhu, Three point energy correlators in the collinear limit: symmetries, dualities and analytic results , JHEP 08 (2020) 028, [1912.11050]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Chang, M

    C.-H. Chang, M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov, Transverse spin in the light-ray OPE , JHEP 05 (2022) 059, [ 2010.04726]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [52]

    G. P. Korchemsky and A. Zhiboedov, On the light-ray algebra in conformal field theories , JHEP 02 (2022) 140, [ 2109.13269]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Chang and D

    C.-H. Chang and D. Simmons-Duffin, Three-point energy correlators and the celestial block expansion, JHEP 02 (2023) 126, [ 2202.04090]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    L. J. Dixon, I. Moult and H. X. Zhu, Collinear limit of the energy-energy correlator , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 014009, [ 1905.01310]. – 55 –

    2019 arXiv

  48. [55]

    H. Chen, I. Moult, X. Zhang and H. X. Zhu, Rethinking jets with energy correlators: Tracks, resummation, and analytic continuation , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 054012, [ 2004.11381]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [56]

    H. Chen, I. Moult and H. X. Zhu, Quantum Interference in Jet Substructure from Spinning Gluons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 112003, [ 2011.02492]

    2021 arXiv

  50. [57]

    H. Chen, I. Moult and H. X. Zhu, Spinning gluons from the QCD light-ray OPE , JHEP 08 (2022) 233, [ 2104.00009]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Cuomo, E

    G. Cuomo, E. Firat, F. Nardi and L. Ricci, Conformal Collider Physics at Large Charge , 2503.21867

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Henriksson, P

    J. Henriksson, P. Kravchuk and B. Oertel, Missing local operators, zeros, and twist-4 trajectories, JHEP 07 (2024) 248, [ 2312.09283]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper and G. F. Sterman, Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD , Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 5 (1989) 1–91, [ hep-ph/0409313]

    1989 arXiv

  54. [62]

    G. F. Sterman, Partons, factorization and resummation, TASI 95 , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 95): QCD and Beyond , pp. 327–408, 6,

  55. [63]

    I. Z. Rothstein and I. W. Stewart, An Effective Field Theory for Forward Scattering and Factorization Violation, JHEP 08 (2016) 025, [ 1601.04695]

    2016 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Neill, A

    D. Neill, A. Pathak and I. W. Stewart, Small-x factorization from effective field theory , JHEP 09 (2023) 089, [ 2303.13710]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    A. Gao, I. Moult, S. Raman, G. Ridgway and I. W. Stewart, A collinear perspective on the Regge limit, JHEP 05 (2024) 328, [ 2401.00931]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Giombi, Higher Spin — CFT Duality , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings , pp

    S. Giombi, Higher Spin — CFT Duality , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings , pp. 137–214, 2017. 1607.02967. DOI

    2017 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Henriksson, The critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data , Phys

    J. Henriksson, The critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data , Phys. Rept. 1002 (2023) 1–72, [2201.09520]

    2023

  60. [68]

    Parisi, The Theory of Nonrenormalizable Interactions

    G. Parisi, The Theory of Nonrenormalizable Interactions. 1. The Large N Expansion , Nucl. Phys. B 100 (1975) 368–388

    1975

  61. [69]

    L. Fei, S. Giombi and I. R. Klebanov, Critical O(N ) models in 6 − ϵ dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 025018, [ 1404.1094]

    2014 arXiv

  62. [70]

    L. Fei, S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky, Three loop analysis of the critical O(N) models in 6- ε dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 045011, [ 1411.1099]

    2015 arXiv

  63. [71]

    J. A. Gracey, Four loop renormalization of ϕ3 theory in six dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 025012, [ 1506.03357]

    2015 arXiv

  64. [72]

    V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15 (1972) 438–450. – 56 –

    1972

  65. [73]

    Y. L. Dokshitzer, Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics. , Sov. Phys. JETP 46 (1977) 641–653

    1977

  66. [74]

    Lang and W

    K. Lang and W. Ruhl, The Critical O(N) sigma model at dimensions 2 < d < 4: Fusion coefficients and anomalous dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 400 (1993) 597–623

    1993

  67. [75]

    Giombi and V

    S. Giombi and V. Kirilin, Anomalous dimensions in CFT with weakly broken higher spin symmetry, JHEP 11 (2016) 068, [ 1601.01310]

    2016 arXiv

  68. [76]

    L. N. Lipatov, Reggeization of the Vector Meson and the Vacuum Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 23 (1976) 338–345

    1976

  69. [77]

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov and V. S. Fadin, Multi - Reggeon Processes in the Yang-Mills Theory, Sov. Phys. JETP 44 (1976) 443–450

    1976

  70. [78]

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov and V. S. Fadin, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. Phys. JETP 45 (1977) 199–204

    1977

  71. [79]

    I. I. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromodynamics , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28 (1978) 822–829

    1978

  72. [80]

    R. C. Brower, J. Polchinski, M. J. Strassler and C.-I. Tan, The Pomeron and gauge/string duality, JHEP 12 (2007) 005, [ hep-th/0603115]

    2007 arXiv

  73. [81]

    A. N. Manashov, S. Moch and L. A. Shumilov, Anomalous dimensions at small spins , 2506.05132

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    J. R. Forshaw and D. A. Ross, Quantum Chromodynamics and the Pomeron , vol. 9. Oxford University Press, 1998, 10.1017/9781009290111

    1998 doi

  75. [83]

    J. Liu, D. Meltzer, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The Lorentzian inversion formula and the spectrum of the 3d O(2) CFT , JHEP 09 (2020) 115, [ 2007.07914]

    2020 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Caron-Huot, Y

    S. Caron-Huot, Y. Gobeil and Z. Zahraee, The leading trajectory in the 2+1D Ising CFT , JHEP 02 (2023) 190, [ 2007.11647]

    2023 arXiv

  77. [85]

    S. E. Derkachov and A. N. Manashov, The Simple scheme for the calculation of the anomalous dimensions of composite operators in the 1/N expansion , Nucl. Phys. B 522 (1998) 301–320, [hep-th/9710015]

    1998 arXiv

  78. [86]

    A. N. Vasiliev and A. S. Stepanenko, A Method of calculating the critical dimensions of composite operators in the massless nonlinear sigma model , Theor. Math. Phys. 94 (1993) 471–481

    1993

  79. [87]

    Lang and W

    K. Lang and W. Ruhl, Critical nonlinear O(N) sigma models at 2 < d < 4: The Degeneracy of quasiprimary fields and it resolution , Z. Phys. C 61 (1994) 495–510

    1994

  80. [88]

    S. E. Derkachov and A. N. Manashov, On the stability problem in the O(N) nonlinear sigma model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 1423–1427, [ hep-th/9705020]

    1997 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Lang and W

    K. Lang and W. Ruhl, Field algebra for critical O(N) vector nonlinear sigma models at 2 < d < 4, Z. Phys. C 50 (1991) 285–292

    1991

  82. [90]

    Lang and W

    K. Lang and W. Ruhl, Anomalous dimensions of tensor fields of arbitrary rank for critical nonlinear O(N) sigma models at 2 < d < 4 to first order in 1/N , Z. Phys. C 51 (1991) 127–132. – 57 –

    1991

  83. [91]

    A. N. Manashov, E. D. Skvortsov and M. Strohmaier, Higher spin currents in the critical O(N ) vector model at 1/N2, JHEP 08 (2017) 106, [ 1706.09256]

    2017 arXiv

  84. [92]

    L. F. Alday, J. Henriksson and M. van Loon, An alternative to diagrams for the critical O(N) model: dimensions and structure constants to order 1/N 2, JHEP 01 (2020) 063, [1907.02445]

    2020 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Chang, H

    C.-H. Chang, H. Chen, D. Simmons-Duffin and H. X. Zhu, Seeing through the confinement screen: DGLAP/BFKL mixing and light-ray matching in QCD , 2506.06431

  86. [94]

    V. M. Braun, G. P. Korchemsky and D. M¨ uller, The Uses of conformal symmetry in QCD , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51 (2003) 311–398, [ hep-ph/0306057]

    2003 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Chen, QCD factorization from light-ray OPE , JHEP 01 (2024) 035, [ 2311.00350]

    H. Chen, QCD factorization from light-ray OPE , JHEP 01 (2024) 035, [ 2311.00350]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [96]

    M. S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov, Spinning Conformal Correlators , JHEP 11 (2011) 071, [ 1107.3554]

    2011 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Hatta, Relating e+ e- annihilation to high energy scattering at weak and strong coupling , JHEP 11 (2008) 057, [ 0810.0889]

    Y. Hatta, Relating e+ e- annihilation to high energy scattering at weak and strong coupling , JHEP 11 (2008) 057, [ 0810.0889]

    2008 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Caron-Huot, Holographic cameras: an eye for the bulk , JHEP 03 (2023) 047, [ 2211.11791]

    S. Caron-Huot, Holographic cameras: an eye for the bulk , JHEP 03 (2023) 047, [ 2211.11791]

    2023 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Cornalba, M

    L. Cornalba, M. S. Costa, J. Penedones and R. Schiappa, Eikonal Approximation in AdS/CFT: From Shock Waves to Four-Point Functions , JHEP 08 (2007) 019, [ hep-th/0611122]

    2007 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Cornalba, M

    L. Cornalba, M. S. Costa and J. Penedones, Eikonal Methods in AdS/CFT: BFKL Pomeron at Weak Coupling, JHEP 06 (2008) 048, [ 0801.3002]

    2008 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Caron-Huot, Resummation of non-global logarithms and the BFKL equation , JHEP 03 (2018) 036, [ 1501.03754]

    S. Caron-Huot, Resummation of non-global logarithms and the BFKL equation , JHEP 03 (2018) 036, [ 1501.03754]

    2018 arXiv

  94. [102]

    V. N. Gribov, The theory of complex angular momenta: Gribov lectures on theoretical physics . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 6, 2007, 10.1017/CBO9780511534959

    2007 doi

  95. [103]

    Basso and G

    B. Basso and G. P. Korchemsky, Anomalous dimensions of high-spin operators beyond the leading order, Nucl. Phys. B 775 (2007) 1–30, [ hep-th/0612247]

    2007 arXiv

  96. [104]

    A. H. Mueller, Multiplicity and hadron distributions in qcd jets:(ii). a general procedure for all non-leading terms, Nuclear Physics B 228 (1983) 351–364

    1983

  97. [105]

    Mitov, S

    A. Mitov, S. Moch and A. Vogt, Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Evolution of Non-Singlet Fragmentation Functions, Phys. Lett. B 638 (2006) 61–67, [ hep-ph/0604053]

    2006 arXiv

  98. [106]

    A. A. Almasy, S. Moch and A. Vogt, On the Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Evolution of Flavour-Singlet Fragmentation Functions, Nucl. Phys. B 854 (2012) 133–152, [ 1107.2263]

    2012 arXiv

  99. [107]

    S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, Four-Loop Non-Singlet Splitting Functions in the Planar Limit and Beyond , JHEP 10 (2017) 041, [ 1707.08315]

    2017 arXiv

  100. [108]

    C.-Q. He, H. Xing, T.-Z. Yang and H. X. Zhu, Single-inclusive hadron production in electron-positron annihilation at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD , 2503.20441

    arXiv

  101. [109]

    B. A. Kniehl, S. Moch, V. N. Velizhanin and A. Vogt, Flavour Non-Singlet Splitting Functions at Four Loops in QCD – The Fermionic Contributions , 2505.09381

    arXiv

  102. [110]

    Banfi, G

    A. Banfi, G. Marchesini and G. Smye, Away from jet energy flow , JHEP 08 (2002) 006, [hep-ph/0206076]. – 58 –

    2002 arXiv

  103. [111]

    J.-y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill and I. Z. Rothstein, The Rapidity Renormalization Group , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 151601, [ 1104.0881]

    2012 arXiv

  104. [112]

    J.-Y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill and I. Z. Rothstein, A Formalism for the Systematic Treatment of Rapidity Logarithms in Quantum Field Theory , JHEP 05 (2012) 084, [ 1202.0814]

    2012 arXiv

  105. [113]

    C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming and M. E. Luke, Summing Sudakov logarithms in B → Xsγin effective field theory. , Phys. Rev. D 63 (2000) 014006, [ hep-ph/0005275]

    2000 arXiv

  106. [114]

    C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol and I. W. Stewart, An Effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays , Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 114020, [ hep-ph/0011336]

    2001 arXiv

  107. [115]

    C. W. Bauer and I. W. Stewart, Invariant operators in collinear effective theory , Phys. Lett. B 516 (2001) 134–142, [ hep-ph/0107001]

    2001 arXiv

  108. [116]

    C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol and I. W. Stewart, Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 054022, [ hep-ph/0109045]

    2002 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Becher, A

    T. Becher, A. Broggio and A. Ferroglia, Introduction to Soft-Collinear Effective Theory , vol. 896. Springer, 2015, 10.1007/978-3-319-14848-9

    2015 doi

  110. [118]

    Iancu and R

    E. Iancu and R. Venugopalan, The Color glass condensate and high-energy scattering in QCD , pp. 249–3363. 3, 2003. hep-ph/0303204. 10.1142/9789812795533 0005

    2003 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Simmons-Duffin, Projectors, Shadows, and Conformal Blocks , JHEP 04 (2014) 146, [1204.3894]

    D. Simmons-Duffin, Projectors, Shadows, and Conformal Blocks , JHEP 04 (2014) 146, [1204.3894]

    2014 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Karateev, P

    D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, Harmonic Analysis and Mean Field Theory, JHEP 10 (2019) 217, [ 1809.05111]

    2019 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Blumlein, V

    J. Blumlein, V. Ravindran and W. L. van Neerven, On the Drell-Levy-Yan relation to O(alpha(s)**2), Nucl. Phys. B 586 (2000) 349–381, [ hep-ph/0004172]

    2000 arXiv

  114. [122]

    J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Back-To-Back Jets in QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 193 (1981) 381

    1981

  115. [123]

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper and G. F. Sterman, Transverse Momentum Distribution in Drell-Yan Pair and W and Z Boson Production , Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 199–224

    1985

  116. [124]

    Ji, J.-p

    X.-d. Ji, J.-p. Ma and F. Yuan, QCD factorization for semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering at low transverse momentum , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 034005, [ hep-ph/0404183]

    2005 arXiv

  117. [125]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The Analytic Bootstrap and AdS Superhorizon Locality, JHEP 12 (2013) 004, [ 1212.3616]

    2013 arXiv

  118. [126]

    P. Dey, A. Kaviraj and A. Sinha, Mellin space bootstrap for global symmetry , JHEP 07 (2017) 019, [1612.05032]

    2017 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Kirschner and L

    R. Kirschner and L. N. Lipatov, Bare Reggeons in Asymptotic Free Theories, Yad. Fiz. 50 (1989) 1739–1746

    1989

  120. [128]

    Komargodski and A

    Z. Komargodski and A. Zhiboedov, Convexity and Liberation at Large Spin , JHEP 11 (2013) 140, [1212.4103]

    2013 arXiv

  121. [129]

    I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model , Phys. Lett. B 550 (2002) 213–219, [ hep-th/0210114]

    2002 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Sezgin and P

    E. Sezgin and P. Sundell, Holography in 4D (super) higher spin theories and a test via cubic scalar couplings, JHEP 07 (2005) 044, [ hep-th/0305040]. – 59 –

    2005 arXiv

  123. [131]

    R. G. Leigh and A. C. Petkou, Holography of the N=1 higher spin theory on AdS(4) , JHEP 06 (2003) 011, [ hep-th/0304217]

    2003 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Giombi and X

    S. Giombi and X. Yin, Higher Spin Gauge Theory and Holography: The Three-Point Functions, JHEP 09 (2010) 115, [ 0912.3462]

    2010 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Giombi and X

    S. Giombi and X. Yin, The Higher Spin/Vector Model Duality , J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 214003, [1208.4036]

    2013 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Giombi and I

    S. Giombi and I. R. Klebanov, One Loop Tests of Higher Spin AdS/CFT , JHEP 12 (2013) 068, [1308.2337]

    2013 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Giombi, I

    S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov and B. R. Safdi, Higher Spin AdS d+1/CFTd at One Loop , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 084004, [ 1401.0825]

    2014 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Giombi and X

    S. Giombi and X. Yin, On Higher Spin Gauge Theory and the Critical O(N) Model , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 086005, [ 1105.4011]

    2012 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Leonhardt and W

    T. Leonhardt and W. Ruhl, The Minimal conformal O(N) vector sigma model at d = 3 , J. Phys. A 37 (2004) 1403–1413, [ hep-th/0308111]

    2004 arXiv

  130. [138]

    G. J. Turiaci and A. Zhiboedov, Veneziano Amplitude of Vasiliev Theory , JHEP 10 (2018) 034, [1802.04390]

    2018 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Giombi, R

    S. Giombi, R. Huang, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu and G. Tarnopolsky, The O(N ) Model in 4 < d <6 : Instantons and complex CFTs , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 045013, [ 1910.02462]

    2020 arXiv

  132. [140]

    I. Z. Rothstein and M. Saavedra, A Systematic Lagrangian Formulation for Quantum and Classical Gravity at High Energies , 2412.04428

  133. [141]

    Herrmann, M

    E. Herrmann, M. Kologlu and I. Moult, Energy Correlators in Perturbative Quantum Gravity , 2412.05384

    arXiv

  134. [142]

    Caron-Huot, When does the gluon reggeize? , JHEP 05 (2015) 093, [ 1309.6521]

    S. Caron-Huot, When does the gluon reggeize? , JHEP 05 (2015) 093, [ 1309.6521]

    2015 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Balitsky and G

    I. Balitsky and G. A. Chirilli, Next-to-leading order evolution of color dipoles , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 014019, [ 0710.4330]

    2008 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Balitsky and G

    I. Balitsky and G. A. Chirilli, NLO evolution of color dipoles in N=4 SYM , Nucl. Phys. B 822 (2009) 45–87, [ 0903.5326]

    2009 arXiv

  137. [145]

    J. C. Collins, Sudakov form-factors , Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 5 (1989) 573–614, [hep-ph/0312336]

    1989 arXiv

  138. [146]

    J.-y. Chiu, A. Fuhrer, A. H. Hoang, R. Kelley and A. V. Manohar, Soft-Collinear Factorization and Zero-Bin Subtractions , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 053007, [ 0901.1332]

    2009 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Y. Li, D. Neill and H. X. Zhu, An exponential regulator for rapidity divergences , Nucl. Phys. B 960 (2020) 115193, [ 1604.00392]. – 60 –

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.