Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 41 references

SimClass: A Classroom Speech Dataset Generated via Game Engine Simulation For Automatic Speech Recognition Research

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read SimClass: synthetic classroom babble beats generic audio for ASR training

desk verdict A genuinely useful classroom speech resource whose central fidelity claim is underdetermined by its own experiments; worth refereeing with demands for extra controls or softer claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09206 v1 pith:E5WGUTNF submitted 2025-06-10 cs.SD cs.AIcs.CLeess.AS

Ahmed Adel Attia , Jing Liu , Carl Espy-Wilson This is my paper
classification cs.SDcs.AIcs.CLeess.AS
keywords SimClassclassroomspeechdatasetgameengineacousticsimulationchildren'sbabblenoiseautomaticrecognitionenhancementdataaugmentationUnitySteamAudio
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a fully synthetic classroom speech dataset can stand in for real classroom recordings when training speech recognition and enhancement models. Real classroom audio is scarce and hard to share because children's speech is protected, so a public synthetic substitute would unlock education-focused speech AI. The authors build SimClass by pairing a public children's speech corpus with lecture videos for clean speech, and by simulating children's babble and room acoustics in the Unity game engine for noise. Their experiments show that fine-tuning Wav2vec2 on SimClass beats training on Librispeech or TEDLIUM on two real classroom test sets, and that simulated classroom noise helps more than adult babble noise.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the game-engine simulation pipeline: a Unity classroom with acoustically designed surfaces (desks, chairs, whiteboards, windows, carpets) and 20 spatial, directive audio sources each playing a different child-speech track from the untranscribed portion of MyST, plus random chair noises and ambient background tracks, captured by a moving audio listener. Steam Audio provides real-time diffraction, occlusion, and material-dependent reverberation so the babble has room acoustics rather than simple additive noise. The clean speech half pairs MyST child utterances with OCW and Khan Academy lecture audio, with occasional 0.5-1 second overlaps to imitate interruptions. That combination lets the authors produce clean and noisy versions of the same content, a split real classroom recordings cannot offer.

What would settle it

Compare the simulated noise against real classroom recordings on physical acoustics (reverberation time, spectral shape, babble modulation spectrum), then retrain the W2V-Classroom model on a matched-duration corpus of generic diverse noise with the same SNR distribution; if the generic-noise model matches or beats SimClass-Noisy on NCTE and MPT, the classroom-fidelity claim is what fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

SimClass is a 391-hour public classroom speech dataset built from the My Science Tutor children's speech corpus combined with MIT OpenCourseWare and Khan Academy lecture audio, plus 50 hours of synthetic classroom noise rendered in Unity with Steam Audio spatial acoustics. The paper's central claim is that this synthetic combination closely approximates real classroom speech: a Wav2vec2 model fine-tuned on SimClass clean audio reaches 38.59% WER on the NCTE math-classroom test set versus 40.64% with Librispeech and 55.82% with TEDLIUM, and adding the simulated babble noise lowers WER to 32.88% on NCTE and 35.74% on MPT, beating adult babble from FreeSound. Mixing SimClass noisy data with a small amount of real NCTE classroom data gives the best results (19.63% and 28.52% WER). The same dataset enables speech enhancement: fine-tuning the StoRM diffusion model on SimClass improves PESQ, ESTOI, and SI-SDR at every tested SNR between -5 and 15 dB.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that babble made by playing 20 child-speech tracks in a virtual classroom with simulated walls and chairs sounds and behaves enough like real children's babble that any gains on classroom tests come from that fidelity, not from generic noise robustness or from the sheer size of the synthetic corpus.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ASR and enhancement models for classrooms can be developed without access to protected children's recordings, since SimClass is public and contains no real classroom audio.
  • Training on SimClass-Noisy outperforms training on a real classroom corpus (NCTE) on the MPT test set, suggesting synthetic data can substitute for some real classroom data.
  • Combining SimClass with a small amount of real classroom data outperforms either alone, pointing to synthetic noise as an augmentation strategy rather than a replacement.
  • Simulated children's babble from the game engine beats adult babble from FreeSound for classroom ASR, evidence that the acoustic character of the noise matters.
  • The clean/noisy pairing enables speech enhancement training for classrooms, a task that was previously impossible with real recordings because true clean references do not exist.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If game-engine noise transfers because of acoustic fidelity, the same Unity/Steam Audio pipeline could be reused to generate matched noise for other protected or hard-to-record environments such as telehealth visits, courtrooms, or open-plan offices; the paper only gestures at this generality.
  • The WER gains might partly reflect the sheer diversity of the 50-hour simulated noise rather than classroom-specific fidelity; an ablation matching the FreeSound babble corpus in duration and SNR distribution would separate these factors, and the paper's own diversity experiment suggests noise diversity matters.
  • A direct acoustic validation is still missing: comparing the simulated noise's modulation spectrum, reverberation time, and signal-to-babble ratio against real classroom recordings would settle whether the approximation is acoustic or merely functional.
  • The method of pairing child and adult speech with random overlap only approximates discourse; richer dialogue simulation or topic-matched teacher speech could further close the gap, but the paper's results suggest even this simple pairing helps.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces SimClass, a synthetic classroom speech dataset created by pairing the MyST children's speech corpus with lecture audio from Khan Academy and MIT OpenCourseWare for clean speech, and by using the Unity game engine with Steam Audio to simulate classroom babble noise from multiple MyST child speech sources. The authors report fine-tuning Wav2Vec 2.0 models on clean and noisy versions of SimClass and evaluating them on two real classroom test sets (NCTE and MPT), claiming that SimClass closely approximates real classroom speech. They also fine-tune the StoRM speech enhancement model on SimClass and report improvements in PESQ, ESTOI, and SI-SDR. The paper argues that SimClass is the largest and first public classroom speech dataset and that the game-engine noise synthesis methodology is scalable to other domains.

Significance. If the central claim were fully established, SimClass would fill a real gap: public classroom speech data are scarce, and no public children's babble noise corpus exists. The dataset release, with clean and noisy paired versions, would enable ASR and speech enhancement research that is currently difficult. The methodology is also a strength: using a game engine with spatial audio to synthesize controllable classroom noise is a scalable approach, and the paper makes the construction pipeline transparent. The evaluation is not circular: it uses external real classroom test sets (NCTE, MPT) and compares against off-the-shelf corpora (Librispeech, TEDLIUM), which is the right kind of evidence. However, the evidence as presented does not yet isolate classroom-specific fidelity, and several claims in the paper go beyond what the experiments show.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5, Table 4] Table 4 shows that training on SimClass mixed with the full FreeSound corpus (car, AC, metro, traffic, adult babble) achieves WER 32.63 on NCTE and 35.58 on MPT, essentially matching SimClass-Noisy (32.88 and 35.74). This is important evidence that the robustness gain comes from noise diversity rather than from the Unity/Steam Audio classroom simulation specifically. The central claim that SimClass 'closely approximates real classroom speech' is therefore not supported unless the acoustic fidelity of the simulation is demonstrated by other means; as it stands, this table suggests that generic noise diversity is sufficient to match the simulated classroom noise, and the authors' own sentence about 'room for improvement' concedes this.
  2. [Section 3.1 and Table 1] SimClass-Clean is constructed by concatenating MyST child speech with OCW/Khan lecture audio, with 20% of files having brief overlaps. The paper also states that 'there are some tracks that were just student talk.' The reported superiority of SimClass-Clean (38.59/39.98 WER on NCTE/MPT) over Librispeech (40.64/47.59) and TEDLIUM (55.82/59.63) could be entirely due to the presence of child speech from the same domain as the test sets, rather than to the simulated teacher-student alternation described in Section 3.1. Without a control trained on MyST alone, or on MyST combined with non-instructional adult speech, the contribution of the classroom-interaction design is not isolated.
  3. [Section 4.1] The evaluation relies on two small test sets (NCTE, 2.9 hours; MPT, 3 hours) and reports single-run WER numbers without error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests. For example, the clean-condition gain on NCTE is 38.59 versus 40.64, a gap that may be within run-to-run variation of Wav2Vec 2.0 fine-tuning. The paper should report multiple runs or at least bootstrap confidence intervals to establish that the observed differences are not noise.
  4. [Section 3.2] The paper asserts that Unity and Steam Audio provide 'high-fidelity audio simulation' and 'accurately simulate the acoustic characteristics of the classroom environment,' but no acoustic measurements are reported. There are no comparisons of reverberation time, long-term spectra, modulation spectra, or estimated SNR between the simulated noise and the real NCTE/MPT recordings. Given that Table 4 weakens the indirect behavioral evidence, the absence of direct acoustic validation is a load-bearing gap for the paper's central fidelity claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1 caption and Table 2] The caption of Table 1 contains a typo: 'Freesoud' should be 'FreeSound.' In Table 2, the column header 'SI-SDI' should be 'SI-SDR' (scale-invariant signal-to-distortion ratio).
  2. [Section 1] The abstract and Section 1 claim that SimClass is 'the only public classroom speech dataset.' However, the NCTE dataset used in this paper is itself publicly available and consists of real classroom recordings and transcripts. Please qualify this claim to avoid an overstatement, for example by saying 'the only public dataset designed specifically for ASR training of classroom speech' or by acknowledging NCTE as an existing public resource.
  3. [Section 2.1 and 3.1] The composition of SimClass-Clean is not fully quantified. The paper should report the number of hours contributed by MyST, OCW, and Khan Academy separately, as well as the proportion of tracks that are MyST-only versus combined tracks, so that readers can understand what 'clean classroom speech' actually contains.
  4. [Section 3.1] The overlap mechanism is described as 'random overlap between 0.5 seconds and 1 second for 20% of the files,' but it is not stated how the overlap is realized (e.g., mixing the tail of one utterance with the head of the next) or whether the overlapping portions are labeled as speech for ASR training. Please clarify.
  5. [Table 3] The 'Mixed' column in Table 3 refers to mixing the noisy and enhanced signals, but the mixing ratio is not specified in the text. Please state how the two signals are combined, since this affects the reproducibility of the reported WER gains.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SimClass's central claim is evaluated against external real classroom test sets, and no fitted parameter or self-citation chain forces the reported results.

full rationale

The paper's claim that SimClass 'closely approximates real classroom speech' is supported by WER transfer to two external, independently collected real classroom test sets (NCTE and MPT), compared against off-the-shelf Librispeech and TEDLIUM baselines. The construction choices (MyST children's speech plus OCW/Khan lectures, and Unity/Steam Audio babble at uniformly sampled SNRs) are not fitted to the test sets, and no parameter is estimated from the target data and then renamed as a prediction. The self-citations to W2V-Classroom [5] and Kid-Whisper [16] provide pretrained models and speaker-disjoint splits, but the central comparison also uses W2V-Robust, so the argument does not reduce to those citations. Section 5, Table 4 contains an honest limitation: training with all FreeSound noise categories matches SimClass-Noisy (32.63 vs 32.88 on NCTE; 35.58 vs 35.74 on MPT), showing that generic noise diversity can match the simulated classroom noise. This weakens the acoustic-fidelity claim but is not circular. Section 6 likewise admits that the clean version does not yet model teacher/student positions or room acoustics. These are evidence gaps, not definitional or fit-based circularity. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on unvalidated assumptions about the fidelity of the game engine simulation and the representativeness of the constituent corpora. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • number_of_babble_sources = 20
    Chosen by hand for the noise simulation; affects noise level and spatial density but not fitted to target results.
  • overlap_probability_and_duration = 20% of files, 0.5 to 1 second
    Design choice for simulating interruptions in the clean speech base; no optimization.
  • snr_grid = -5 to 15 dB in 5 dB steps
    Uniform SNR range for mixing noise; standard practice, not optimized.
  • noise_duration = 50 hours
    Amount of simulated noise captured; arbitrary scale choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Steam Audio simulations accurately reproduce real classroom acoustics
    The paper assumes built-in spatial audio and acoustic materials are sufficient for realism; no validation against measured room impulse responses.
  • domain assumption Alternating child and adult speech with occasional overlap approximates classroom interaction
    Section 3.1; the authors acknowledge linguistic mismatch and argue it does not matter for acoustic models, but never show this.
  • domain assumption Untranscribed MyST speech is a good proxy for children's babble in classrooms
    Section 3.2; uses untranscribed portions of MyST as babble sources without checking acoustic similarity to real classroom babble.
  • domain assumption NCTE and MPT test sets are representative of classroom speech
    Used as ground truth for evaluation; they are the only available benchmarks, but are small (2.9h and 3h).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SimClass: A Classroom Speech Dataset Generated via Game Engine Simulation For Automatic Speech Recognition Research." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E5WGUTNF

@misc{pith2026250609206,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SimClass: A Classroom Speech Dataset Generated via Game Engine Simulation For Automatic Speech Recognition Research},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E5WGUTNF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09206}
}
read the original abstract

The scarcity of large-scale classroom speech data has hindered the development of AI-driven speech models for education. Public classroom datasets remain limited, and the lack of a dedicated classroom noise corpus prevents the use of standard data augmentation techniques. In this paper, we introduce a scalable methodology for synthesizing classroom noise using game engines, a framework that extends to other domains. Using this methodology, we present SimClass, a dataset that includes both a synthesized classroom noise corpus and a simulated classroom speech dataset. The speech data is generated by pairing a public children's speech corpus with YouTube lecture videos to approximate real classroom interactions in clean conditions. Our experiments on clean and noisy speech demonstrate that SimClass closely approximates real classroom speech, making it a valuable resource for developing robust speech recognition and enhancement models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.09206 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Breakdown of word error rate (WER) for W2V￾Classroom fine-tuned on a combination of SimClass noisy and NCTE training sets. The model is evaluated on the SimClass test set mixed with noise at varying SNR levels. The WER is decomposed into insertions, deletions, and substitutions, which sum up to the total WER at each SNR. ure 1 shows the performance of the model trained on SimClass Noisy and NCTE training sets, teste… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Speech models are no exception

    Introduction The performance of AI models is defined by its training data, and the model’s ability to learn from this data. Speech models are no exception. For instance, Whisper [1] was able to achieve state-of-the-art performance in the Automatic Speech Recogni- tion (ASR) task by training on more than half a million hours of transcribed speech scrapped ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    SimClass: A Classroom Speech Dataset Generated via Game Engine Simulation For Automatic Speech Recognition Research

    Datasets 2.1. Datasets Used To Create SimClass 2.1.1. My Science Tutor (MyST) The MyST corpus is the largest publicly available children’s speech corpus. It consists of 393 hours of conversational children’s speech, recorded from virtual tutoring sessions in physics, geography, biology. The corpus spans 1,371 third, fourth, and fifth-grade students. Aroun...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Creating The Clean Classroom Speech Base To create the clean version of SimClass, we combine the adult corpora from OCW and Khan Academy with tracks from the MyST dataset

    Methodology 3.1. Creating The Clean Classroom Speech Base To create the clean version of SimClass, we combine the adult corpora from OCW and Khan Academy with tracks from the MyST dataset. To create variety, for each combination, the file can either start with child speech followed by adult speech, or vice versa. In either case, we allow for a random over...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Experiments 4.1. ASR Experiments To validate our data, we run ablation ASR experiments com- paring the effectiveness of training a Wav2vec2.0-based model on our data and noise versus off-the-shelf datasets. We consid- ered two off-the-shelf datasets, Librispeech [27] and TEDLIUM [28]. Librispeech is a popular dataset and is a standard choice for developin...

    work page

  5. [5]

    In this section, we experiment with using all noise categories in the FreeSound corpus, including Car, AC, Metro, Cafe, Traffic as well as Adult Babble

    On the Effect of Diversity of Noise on Generalizability In our experiments with the FreeSound noise corpus, we only used the noise files with adult babble noise. In this section, we experiment with using all noise categories in the FreeSound corpus, including Car, AC, Metro, Cafe, Traffic as well as Adult Babble. Table 3:ASR WER performance with the W2V-C...

    work page

  6. [6]

    We also propose a novel and versatile method of simulating noises uti- lizing game engines

    Conclusion and Future Research Directions In this paper we present the SimClass classroom speech dataset, the largest and first public classroom speech dataset. We also propose a novel and versatile method of simulating noises uti- lizing game engines. Our ablation studies show our proposed data’s efficacy in two key tasks, ASR and speech enhancement. In ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak su- pervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, T. Xu, G. Brockman, C. McLeavey, and I. Sutskever, “Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak su- pervision,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 28 492–28 518

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Predicting positive transfer for improved low-resource speech recognition using acoustic pseudo-tokens

    N. San, G. Paraskevopoulos, A. Arora, X. He, P. Kaur, O. Adams, and D. Jurafsky, “Predicting positive transfer for improved low- resource speech recognition using acoustic pseudo-tokens,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02302, 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Adapting multilingual speech representation model for a new, underresourced language through multilingual fine-tuning and continued pretraining,

    K. Nowakowski, M. Ptaszynski, K. Murasaki, and J. Nieuwa ˙zny, “Adapting multilingual speech representation model for a new, underresourced language through multilingual fine-tuning and continued pretraining,”Information Processing & Management, vol. 60, no. 2, p. 103148, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Children’s online privacy pro- tection rule (coppa),

    Federal Trade Commission, “Children’s online privacy pro- tection rule (coppa),” 1998, accessed: 2024-10-12. [On- line]. Available: https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/ childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa

    1998

  3. [11]

    Cpt-boosted wav2vec2. 0: Towards noise robust speech recognition for classroom environments,

    A. A. Attia, D. Demszky, T. Ogunremi, J. Liu, and C. Espy- Wilson, “Cpt-boosted wav2vec2. 0: Towards noise robust speech recognition for classroom environments,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14494, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Automatic speech recognition tuned for child speech in the classroom,

    R. Southwell, W. Ward, V . A. Trinh, C. Clevenger, C. Clevenger, E. Watts, J. Reitman, S. D’Mello, and J. Whitehill, “Automatic speech recognition tuned for child speech in the classroom,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acous- tics, Speech and Signal Proc...

    2024

  5. [13]

    Challenges and feasibility of automatic speech recognition for modeling student collaborative discourse in classrooms

    R. Southwell, S. Pugh, E. M. Perkoff, C. Clevenger, J. B. Bush, R. Lieber, W. Ward, P. Foltz, and S. D’Mello, “Challenges and feasibility of automatic speech recognition for modeling student collaborative discourse in classrooms.”International Educational Data Mining Society, 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Towards better domain adaptation for self-supervised models: A case study of child asr,

    R. Fan, Y . Zhu, J. Wang, and A. Alwan, “Towards better domain adaptation for self-supervised models: A case study of child asr,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1242–1252, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    Benchmarking children’s asr with supervised and self-supervised speech foundation mod- els,

    R. Fan, N. B. Shankar, and A. Alwan, “Benchmarking children’s asr with supervised and self-supervised speech foundation mod- els,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10507, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    My science tutor (myst)–a large corpus of children’s conversational speech,

    S. S. Pradhan, R. A. Cole, and W. H. Ward, “My science tutor (myst)–a large corpus of children’s conversational speech,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.13347, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    The ogi kids’ speech cor- pus and recognizers,

    K. Shobaki, J.-P. Hosom, and R. Cole, “The ogi kids’ speech cor- pus and recognizers,” inProc. of ICSLP. Citeseer, 2000, pp. 564–567

    2000

  10. [18]

    The pf star children’s speech corpus,

    A. Batliner, M. Blomberg, S. D’Arcy, D. Elenius, D. Giuliani, M. Gerosa, C. Hacker, M. Russell, S. Steidl, and M. Wong, “The pf star children’s speech corpus,” 2005

    2005

  11. [19]

    Musan: A music, speech, and noise corpus,

    D. Snyder, G. Chen, and D. Povey, “Musan: A music, speech, and noise corpus,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.08484, 2015

    2015 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Freesound technical demo,

    F. Font, G. Roma, and X. Serra, “Freesound technical demo,” in Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multi- media, 2013, pp. 411–412

    2013

  13. [21]

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0),

    Creative Commons, “Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0),” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

    2019

  14. [22]

    Kid-whisper: Towards bridging the performance gap in auto- matic speech recognition for children vs. adults,

    A. A. Attia, J. Liu, W. Ai, D. Demszky, and C. Espy-Wilson, “Kid-whisper: Towards bridging the performance gap in auto- matic speech recognition for children vs. adults,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07927, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    MIT OpenCourseWare - YouTube Channel,

    MIT OpenCourseWare, “MIT OpenCourseWare - YouTube Channel,” 2025, accessed: 2025-02-09. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/c/mitocw

    2025

  16. [24]

    The ncte transcripts: A dataset of elementary math classroom transcripts,

    D. Demszky and H. Hill, “The ncte transcripts: A dataset of elementary math classroom transcripts,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11772, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Design for immersive experience: Role of spatial audio in extended reality applications,

    G. Kailas and N. Tiwari, “Design for immersive experience: Role of spatial audio in extended reality applications,” inDesign for Tomorrow—Volume 2, A. Chakrabarti, R. Poovaiah, P. Bokil, and V . Kant, Eds. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021, pp. 853– 863

    2021

  18. [26]

    Immersive sound for xr,

    A. Reyes-Lecuona, T. Bouchara, and L. Picinali, “Immersive sound for xr,” inImmersive Sound for XR, 2022, pp. 75–102. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119865810.ch4

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    The importance of spa- tial audio in modern games and virtual environments,

    J. Broderick, J. Duggan, and S. Redfern, “The importance of spa- tial audio in modern games and virtual environments,” in2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–9

    2018

  20. [28]

    Virtual reality audio game for entertainment and sound localization training,

    L. G. Gilberto, F. R. Bermejo, F. C. Tommasini, and C. Garc´ıa Bauza, “Virtual reality audio game for entertainment and sound localization training,”ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Unity game engine in visualization, simulation and modelling,

    T. Nieminen, “Unity game engine in visualization, simulation and modelling,” B.S. thesis, 2021

    2021

  22. [30]

    On determinism of game engines used for simulation-based autonomous vehicle verification,

    G. Chance, A. Ghobrial, K. McAreavey, S. Lemaignan, T. Pipe, and K. Eder, “On determinism of game engines used for simulation-based autonomous vehicle verification,”IEEE Trans- actions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 20 538–20 552, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Digital twin simulation of con- nected and automated vehicles with the unity game engine,

    Z. Wang, K. Han, and P. Tiwari, “Digital twin simulation of con- nected and automated vehicles with the unity game engine,” in 2021 IEEE 1st International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence (DTPI), 2021, pp. 1–4

    2021

  24. [32]

    Steam Audio: Real-time Physics-Based Spatial Audio,

    Valve Corporation, “Steam Audio: Real-time Physics-Based Spatial Audio,” 2025, accessed: 2025-02-09. [Online]. Available: https://valvesoftware.github.io/steam-audio/

    2025

  25. [33]

    Lib- rispeech: an asr corpus based on public domain audio books,

    V . Panayotov, G. Chen, D. Povey, and S. Khudanpur, “Lib- rispeech: an asr corpus based on public domain audio books,” in2015 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2015, pp. 5206–5210

    2015

  26. [34]

    Ted-lium 3: Twice as much data and corpus repartition for experiments on speaker adaptation,

    F. Hernandez, V . Nguyen, S. Ghannay, N. Tomashenko, and Y . Es- teve, “Ted-lium 3: Twice as much data and corpus repartition for experiments on speaker adaptation,” inSpeech and Computer: 20th International Conference, SPECOM 2018, Leipzig, Ger- many, September 18–22, 2018, P...

    2018

  27. [35]

    Ro- bust wav2vec 2.0: Analyzing domain shift in self-supervised pre- training,

    W.-N. Hsu, A. Sriram, A. Baevski, T. Likhomanenko, Q. Xu, V . Pratap, J. Kahn, A. Lee, R. Collobert, G. Synnaeveet al., “Ro- bust wav2vec 2.0: Analyzing domain shift in self-supervised pre- training,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.01027, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Storm: A diffusion-based stochastic regeneration model for speech en- hancement and dereverberation,

    J.-M. Lemercier, J. Richter, S. Welker, and T. Gerkmann, “Storm: A diffusion-based stochastic regeneration model for speech en- hancement and dereverberation,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Au- dio, Speech, and Language Processing, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Investigating rnn-based speech enhancement methods for noise- robust text-to-speech

    C. Valentini-Botinhao, X. Wang, S. Takaki, and J. Yamagishi, “Investigating rnn-based speech enhancement methods for noise- robust text-to-speech.” inSSW, 2016, pp. 146–152

    2016

  30. [38]

    Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (pesq)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs,

    A. W. Rix, J. G. Beerends, M. P. Hollier, and A. P. Hekstra, “Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (pesq)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs,” in 2001 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing. Proceed...

    2001

  31. [39]

    An algorithm for predicting the in- telligibility of speech masked by modulated noise maskers,

    J. Jensen and C. H. Taal, “An algorithm for predicting the in- telligibility of speech masked by modulated noise maskers,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Pro- cessing, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2009–2022, 2016

    2009

  32. [40]

    Sdr– half-baked or well done?

    J. Le Roux, S. Wisdom, H. Erdogan, and J. R. Hershey, “Sdr– half-baked or well done?” inICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2019, pp. 626–630

    2019

  33. [41]

    One-pass single-channel noisy speech recognition using a combination of noisy and enhanced features

    M. Fujimoto and H. Kawai, “One-pass single-channel noisy speech recognition using a combination of noisy and enhanced features.” inInterspeech, 2019, pp. 486–490

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.