Radon Transforms and the SYK model

Michael Stone

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Radon Transforms and the SYK model

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By computing Radon transforms of hyperbolic eigenfunctions in the Poincaré disc, this paper argues that the SYK four-point function's special boundary condition—the θ = 3π/4 self-adjoint extension—is fully determined by geodesic geometry…

desk verdict A clear geometric explanation for the SYK θ=3π/4 boundary condition via antipodal symmetry of the Radon transform on the Poincaré disc; the odd-k confirmation rests on slightly hand-adjusted asymptotics, but the main argument holds. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09880 v2 pith:BQ2ZCFGZ submitted 2025-06-11 math-ph cond-mat.mes-hallhep-thmath.MP

Michael Stone This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phcond-mat.mes-hallhep-thmath.MP MSC 44A1233C5535P1081T40

keywords RadontransformSYKmodelhyperbolicspacePoincarédiscdeSitterself-adjointextensionLaplaceeigenfunctionskinematic

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the boundary condition chosen in the SYK four-point function calculation—the self-adjoint extension with angle θ = 3π/4 for a Schrödinger operator whose potential is unbounded below—is not an arbitrary analytic convenience but a geometric necessity. The reason is that the Radon (X-ray) transform, which integrates functions over geodesics, cannot tell which direction a geodesic is traversed. On the Poincaré disc, the image of a Laplace eigenfunction therefore must be invariant under the antipodal map of the de Sitter space of geodesics, and this parity requirement picks out exactly the θ = 3π/4 extension. If the argument is right, the SYK model's peculiar boundary condition is the imprint of the underlying hyperbolic geometry, and the special-function identities used in earlier work become simple geometric statements.

What carries the argument

The Radon (X-ray) transform Rf(γ)=∫_γ f dσ, which averages a function over arc-length-parametrized geodesics, acts as an intertwiner: it sends Laplace eigenfunctions on hyperbolic space to wave-operator eigenfunctions on the kinematic space of geodesics, which is dS2. In the Poincaré-disc basis the geodesics are labelled by (ξ,θ), and the transform lands in two rarely-met families E^k_ν and O^k_ν—the real and imaginary parts of the associated Legendre function of imaginary argument, P^k_{iν−1/2}(i $\sinh$ ξ). The parity of k decides which family appears, and that parity selection is the mechanism that imposes the antipodal symmetry and thereby fixes the self-adjoint extension.

What would settle it

Numerically evaluate the Radon integral for an odd k, such as k = 1, at several finite ξ and ν values by direct quadrature, and compare with the predicted value $π^{{1/2}}$ Im[$P^{1}$_{iν−1/2}(i $\sinh$ ξ)] Γ(1/4 + iν/2)Γ(1/4 − iν/2); a phase or amplitude mismatch would disprove the odd-k conjecture and with it the antipodal selection of θ = 3π/4.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working in the Poincaré-disc model, the paper computes the Radon transform of the Laplace eigenfunctions φ_{k,ν}(ρ,φ)=$e^{{ikφ}}$P^k_{iν−1/2}($\cosh$ ρ). The even-k transforms are proportional to the real part E^k_ν(ξ) = Re[P^k_{iν−1/2}(i $\sinh$ ξ)], while the odd-k transforms are proportional to the imaginary part O^k_ν(ξ) = Im[P^k_{iν−1/2}(i $\sinh$ ξ)]; the odd-k identity is first conjectured and then confirmed by matching large-ξ asymptotics with a branch choice corrected from the cited source to agree with numerics. Because the transform is indifferent to geodesic orientation, the resulting function on the kinematic space dS2 must take equal values at antipodal points, and this forces the alternation between even and odd families. That alternation is exactly what selects the θ = 3π/4 self-adjoint extension used in the SYK four-point function, giving the boundary condition a geometric origin.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the large-distance asymptotic formulas for the special function families E^k_ν and O^k_ν given in Appendix B, with the branch correction the paper says it made to match numerics, are correct; the odd-k transform identity and the orthogonality relations rest on those formulas.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The θ = 3π/4 boundary condition in the SYK four-point function is the unique choice compatible with the antipodal symmetry of unoriented geodesics, so it is geometric rather than a matter of analytic convenience.
In the disc basis the antipodal selection halves the Pöschl–Teller bound-state spectrum, leaving exactly the same sequence ν_n = 3/2, 7/2, 11/2, … found in the upper-half-plane treatment.
The Radon map from L2[H^2_+] to L2[dS2] is not surjective; the bound states of the dS2 wave operator are images of non-normalizable modes, and the continuous-spectrum singular values vanish at the bound-state energies.
The large-ν singular values of the hyperbolic Radon transform behave as √(2π)/|ν|, matching the flat-space Radon transform once the wavelength is short compared with the curvature scale.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the antipodal selection is as fundamental as the paper suggests, the same parity argument should constrain boundary conditions in higher-dimensional hyperbolic spaces, where the kinematic space is again a quotient of the isometry group; testing that generalization would show whether the SYK story is a special case of a general holographic-geometric principle.
The paper's rederivation of a Bessel identity as a geometric statement suggests that other special-function identities in SYK and AdS/CFT computations may likewise encode orientation-forgetting or antipodal symmetries of kinematic spaces.
Because the inverse Radon transform is unbounded—averaging loses information—the non-surjectivity found here quantifies how much bulk signal is irrecoverably smeared; a natural test is whether a discretized inversion of the hyperbolic transform reproduces the expected smoothing of reconstructed boundary data.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Stone has written the most transparent account I've seen of why the SYK four-point function needs θ = 3π/4. The point is that the Radon transform integrates over unoriented geodesics, so its image on kinematic dS2 must be invariant under the antipodal map; in the Poincaré disc basis this forces even-k images to be even functions and odd-k images to be odd functions. That parity selection is precisely what picks the 3π/4 boundary condition. The even-k case is proven in closed form (5.27), and the odd-k case is a labeled conjecture with numerical support and an asymptotic consistency check. That is a genuine advance over [11].

The paper does its main job cleanly: it works out the group-theoretic geometry of geodesic spaces, writes down the relevant eigenfunctions, and uses the intertwining property of the Radon transform to map them to solutions of the dS2 wave operator. The upper-half-plane part reproduces [11] in a simpler way, without hunting through Watson. The disc calculation introduces the E^k_ν and O^k_ν families, which are awkward but well-controlled. I also appreciate that the author flags the non-surjectivity of R and the bound-state issue explicitly.

The soft spot is Appendix B. The asymptotics used to confirm the odd-k conjecture are not simply quoted from [32]; footnote 3 says they were modified by a branch choice to match numerical evaluations. The paper then uses those same asymptotics to claim confirmation of (5.28) and to derive the normalization (B.7). This is not circular—the conjecture is independently checked numerically—but it means the proof of the odd-k case is weaker than the text sometimes suggests. A referee should ask for a derivation of the branch-modified asymptotics or a direct integral proof of (5.28). I don't think this undermines the headline claim, because the parity argument stands on the symmetry of unoriented geodesics, and the upper-half-plane asymptotic already selects θ = 3π/4. The appendix is a support beam, not the foundation.

Overall: this is a math-ph paper for people who care about kinematic space, Radon transforms on hyperbolic space, or the analytical foundations of SYK. It is not a new physical effect, but it clarifies a previously ad hoc choice. It deserves a serious referee.

Recommendation: accept for review, with the Appendix B issue flagged. I would cite it if I wrote about kinematic space or SYK spectral theory.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the Radon (X-ray) transform on two-dimensional hyperbolic space in the context of the SYK model. It shows that the Radon transform maps Laplace eigenfunctions on the hyperbolic plane to eigenfunctions of the wave operator on the kinematic space dS2, and that the self-adjoint extension parameter θ=3π/4 used in the SYK four-point function calculation emerges from the large-distance asymptotics of the transform. The main new result is a Poincaré-disc formulation: the Radon image of the eigenfunction e^{ikφ} P^k_{iν−1/2}(cosh ρ) is proportional to the even function E^kν(ξ)=Re P^k_{iν−1/2}(i sinh ξ) for even k, and conjecturally to the odd function O^kν(ξ)=Im P^k_{iν−1/2}(i sinh ξ) for odd k. The paper interprets this parity alternation as a consequence of the fact that the Radon transform is defined on unoriented geodesics, so its image must be invariant under the antipodal map on dS2; this antipodal symmetry is argued to be the geometric origin of the θ=3π/4 boundary condition.

Significance. If the odd-k conjecture is fully established, the paper provides a clean geometric explanation for an otherwise analytic boundary-condition choice in the SYK literature, and it supplies explicit transform formulas that may be useful for integral geometry on hyperbolic spaces. The even-k case is proven directly from a known integral at ξ=0, and the paper is transparent about the conjectural status of the odd-k case. The upper-half-plane calculation reproduces known results with a simpler derivation. The paper is honest about the limitations of the numerical and asymptotic evidence, which strengthens its credibility.

major comments (1)

[§5.2, Eq. (5.28); Appendix B, Eqs. (B.1)-(B.4), footnote 3] The odd-k identity (5.28) is load-bearing: it is what shows that the Radon image of a k-odd eigenfunction is the odd member O^kν of the modified conical family, and the parity selection in §6 depends on it. The paper labels (5.28) a conjecture, checks it numerically, and then takes the large-ξ matching with (5.32) as confirmation. That confirmation relies on the asymptotic formulas (B.1)-(B.4), which footnote 3 states were not taken from [32] but were adjusted in branch choice to agree with numerical evaluations. The matching is therefore not an independent check: the branch adjustment and the numerical check of (5.28) could in principle have been tuned to the same incorrect answer, and no error estimate or first-principles derivation of (B.1)-(B.4) is supplied. Since an undetected phase or amplitude error in these asymptotics would break the identification of the odd-k Radon image with O^kν and hence the claimed geometric origin of θ=3π/4, I ask that the asymptotics be derived from the hypergeometric representation of the Legendre functions, or that (5.28) be proved independently, or that a rigorous error analysis of the numerical verification be provided.

minor comments (5)

[§5.3] The sentence 'The lowest energy Pöschl–Teller bound state νk = (2k − 1)2/4 should read ν_k = (2k-1)/2; the notation '2/4' is confusing and appears to be a typographical error.
[§5.2, after Eq. (5.33)] The phrase 'normalizing over is the whole of dS2' should be 'normalizing over the whole of dS2'.
[§5.1, Eq. (5.11)] The sentence beginning 'For kη ≫ 1...' would be clearer if it stated explicitly that the dominant contribution to the integral comes from the endpoints of the semicircle, where the geodesic is nearly vertical and the Bessel function is in its oscillatory regime.
[§5.2, Eq. (5.22)] The numerical check reported in footnote 2 would be more reproducible if the branch convention of the Mathematica implementation of P^k_{iν−1/2}(cosh ρ) were stated in the main text alongside the definitions of E^kν and O^kν.
[§5.1 and §5.2] A short dictionary between the upper-half-plane geodesic coordinates (t,ξ) and the Poincaré-disc geodesic coordinates (θ,ξ) would help the reader see that the two Radon-transform calculations are the same transformation in different bases.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the theta=3pi/4 choice is derived from Radon-transform asymptotics and parity selection, not fitted or imported.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The upper-half-plane Radon transform of the eigenfunction chi_{k,nu} is evaluated to the asymptotic form N_nu 2^{-1/2} e^{ikt} |k|^{-1/2} cos(k eta) Gamma(1/4 + i nu/2) Gamma(1/4 - i nu/2) (Eq. 5.11), and this is compared with the large-eta behavior of the Liouville scattering states (Eq. 4.60), fixing theta = 3pi/4 by the phase of cos(k eta); no parameter is fitted from that target. In the Poincare-disc treatment, the even-k Radon transform is computed directly from the xi = 0 integral (Eqs. 5.26-5.27); the odd-k result is first stated as a numerically checked conjecture (Eq. 5.28) and then confirmed by matching the large-xi asymptotics (Eq. 5.32) with the Appendix B expansions of E_k^nu and O_k^nu. The manuscript explicitly acknowledges one caveat in footnote 3: Eqs. (B.1)-(B.4) are not taken verbatim from [32] but involve a branch modification chosen to agree with numerical evaluations of these special functions. This is a genuine correctness risk, because an error in that branch choice would weaken the odd-k confirmation and hence the parity-to-theta link, but it is not circular: the branch choice is fixed by evaluating the E/O functions themselves, not by assuming the Radon-transform identity that the asymptotics are used to prove, and the odd-k conjecture has an independent numerical check in footnote 2. The sole self-citation, [26], provides standard Poschl-Teller bound-state results and is not load-bearing. Thus no circular step reduces the geometric conclusion to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation depends on standard results in operator theory and special functions, on the intertwining property of the Radon transform, and on one branch-modified asymptotic formula whose correction is not fully derived. No free parameters are fitted and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)

standard math Weyl-von Neumann theory: the operator H = -d^2/dxi^2 - k^2 e^{2xi} has a one-parameter family of self-adjoint extensions parameterized by theta, with boundary condition (4.60).
Invoked in Section 4.2 to define the family of boundary conditions and the bound-state spectrum nu_n = 2(n + theta/pi). This is standard operator theory, as cited from [7-9].
domain assumption Radon transform intertwining property, Eq. (5.2): -nabla^2_dS(R f) = R(-nabla^2_H f).
Central to translating hyperbolic eigenfunctions into dS2 eigenfunctions. It is stated with a group-theoretic sketch in Section 5, relying on standard integral geometry results [12-14].
ad hoc to paper Branch-modified large-xi asymptotics for E^k_nu and O^k_nu, Eqs. (B.1)-(B.4).
The paper adjusts the asymptotics from [32] to agree with numerical evaluations (footnote 3) and uses these to confirm the odd-k Radon transform and derive orthogonality (B.7). The corrected expressions are not derived from first principles.
standard math Completeness and orthogonality of the associated Legendre functions P^k_{i nu - 1/2}(cosh rho) on the hyperboloid.
Used in Section 4.1.2 to define the spectral decomposition of the Laplace operator in polar coordinates; standard result in the spectral theory of the hyperbolic Laplacian.
domain assumption The space of unoriented geodesics on H^2 is the antipodal quotient dS2/Z2, so Radon-transformed functions must be antipodally symmetric.
This is the geometric input in Section 5.2 and the Conclusions; it follows from the definition of the Radon integral over unoriented geodesics, and the paper explains it via figure 6, but it is an assumption about the target space of the transform.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Radon Transforms and the SYK model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQ2ZCFGZ

@misc{pith2026250609880,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Radon Transforms and the SYK model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQ2ZCFGZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09880}
}

read the original abstract

Motivated by recent work on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model, we consider the effect of Radon or X-ray transformations, on the Laplace eigenfunctions in hyperbolic Bolyai-Lobachevsky space. We show that the Radon map from this space to Lorentzian-signature Anti-de Sitter or de Sitter space is easier to interpret if we use the Poincare disc model and eigenfunctions rather than the upper-half-plane model. In particular, this version of the transform reveals the geometric origin of the boundary conditions imposed on the eigenfunctions that are involved in calculating the SYK four-point function.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

[11]

S. R. Das, A. Ghosh, A. Jevicki, K. Suzuki, Space-Time in the SYK Model , JHEP07(2018)184; arXiv:1712.02725

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[32]

N. K. Chukhrukidze, Asymptotic expansions of Legendre Spherical Functions wit h an imaginary Argument , USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 8 (1968)1-13. – 43 –

work page 1968
[1]

Kitaev, Seminars A simple model of quantum holography

A. Kitaev, Seminars A simple model of quantum holography . Seminars in the KITP Strings and Entanglement program 2015. (Feb. 12, April 7, and May 27, 2015) http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/

work page 2015
[2]

Sachdev, J

S. Sachdev, J. Ye, Gapless spin-ﬂuid ground state in a random quantum Heisenbe rg magnet , Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3339–3342

work page 1993
[3]

Maldacena, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , Phys

J. Maldacena, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 10, 106002; ArXiv:1604.07818

arXiv 2016
[4]

Rosenhaus, An introduction to the SYK model , J

V. Rosenhaus, An introduction to the SYK model , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52 (2019) 323001

work page 2019
[5]

S´ arosi, AdS2 holography and the SYK model , ArXiv:1711.08482

G. S´ arosi, AdS2 holography and the SYK model , ArXiv:1711.08482

arXiv
[6]

Polchinski, V

J. Polchinski, V. Rosenhaus, The Spectrum in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model , JHEP04(2016)001; ArXiv 1601.06768

arXiv 2016

Show all 32 references

[7]

T. M. Dunster, Bessel functions of purely imaginary order, with an applica tion to second- order linear diﬀerential equations having a large paramete r , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 21 (1990), 995-1018

1990
[8]

D. M. Gitman, I. V. Tyutin, B. L. Voronov, Self-adjoint Extensions in Quantum Mechanics , (Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2012)

2012
[9]

A. A. Andrianov, C. Lan, O. O. Novikov, Y-F. Wang, Integrable minisuperspace models with Liouville ﬁeld: energy density self-adjointness and semic lassical wave packets , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 786

2018
[10]

Kobayashi, I

H. Kobayashi, I. Tsutsui, Quantum mechanical Liouville model with attractive potent ial, Nuclear Physics B 472 (1996) 409-426; arXiv:hep-th/9601111 – 41 –

1996 arXiv
[12]

Helgason, The Radon Transform , 2nd edition, Springer (NY) 2013

S. Helgason, The Radon Transform , 2nd edition, Springer (NY) 2013

2013
[13]

I. M. Gel’fand, M. I. Graev, N. Ya. Vilenkin, Generalized Functions, Volume 5: Integral Geometry and Representation Theory , AMS Chelsea Publishing (1966)

1966
[14]

E. C. Tarabusi, M. A. Picardello, Radon Transforms in Hyperbolic Spaces and Their Discrete Counterparts, Complex Analysis and Operator Theory (2021) 15:13

2021
[15]

G. N. Watson, A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions , Cambridge University Press 1922

1922
[16]

Kitaev, Notes on ~SL(2,R ) representations, arXiv:1711.08169

A. Kitaev, Notes on ~SL(2,R ) representations, arXiv:1711.08169

arXiv
[17]

Czech, L

B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish, J. Sully, Integral geometry and holography , JHEP10(2015)175; ArXiv 1505.05515

2015 arXiv
[18]

Bargmann, Irreducible Unitary Representations of the Lorentz Group , Annals of Mathematics (Second Series) 48 (1947) 568-640

V. Bargmann, Irreducible Unitary Representations of the Lorentz Group , Annals of Mathematics (Second Series) 48 (1947) 568-640

1947
[19]

Czech, L

B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish, B. Mosk, J. Sully, A Stereoscopic Look into the Bulk , JHEP07(2016)129; arXiv:1604.03110

2016 arXiv
[20]

Huang, C-T

X. Huang, C-T. Ma, Berry Curvature and Riemann Curvature in Kinematic Space wi th Spherical Entangling Surface , Progress of Physics, 69 (2021) 2000048; arXiv:2003.12252

2021 arXiv
[21]

Huang, C-T

X. Huang, C-T. Ma, The probe of curvature in the Lorentzian AdS2/CFT1 correspo ndence, Phys. Lett. B (2019) 134936; arXiv:1907.01422

2019 arXiv
[22]

T. M. Dunster, Conical functions of purely imaginary order and argument , Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 143A (2013) 929-955

2013
[23]

Digital Library of Mathematical Functions , https://dlmf.nist.gov
[24]

Oberhettinger, T

F. Oberhettinger, T. P. Higgins, Tables of Lebedev, Mehler, and Generalized Mehler Transforms, Boeing Scientiﬁc Research report D1-82-0136 (1961). https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0267210.pdf

1961
[25]

Balasubramanian, J

V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer, D. Minic, Exploring de Sitter Space and Holography , Annals of Physics 303, (2003) 59-116; arXiv:0207245

2003
[26]

Goldbart, M

P. Goldbart, M. Stone, Mathematics for Physics , Cambridge University Press ( 2009)

2009
[27]

N. Ya. Vilenkin, A. U. Klimyk, Representation of Lie Groups and Special Functions , Kluwer Academic, London, 1991 Vols. I, II, III

1991
[28]

Comtet, On the Landau Levels on the Hyperbolic Plane , Annals of Physics (NY) 173 (1987) 185-209

A. Comtet, On the Landau Levels on the Hyperbolic Plane , Annals of Physics (NY) 173 (1987) 185-209

1987
[29]

Comtet, Eﬀective action on the hyperbolic plane in a constant extern al ﬁeld , J

A. Comtet, Eﬀective action on the hyperbolic plane in a constant extern al ﬁeld , J. Math. Phys. 26 (1985) 185-191

1985
[30]

Comtet, Eﬀective action on the hyperbolic plane in a constant extern al ﬁeld , J

A. Comtet, Eﬀective action on the hyperbolic plane in a constant extern al ﬁeld , J. Math. Phys. 26, (1985)185-191

1985
[31]

J. D. Fay, Fourier coeﬃcients of the resolvent for a Fuchsian group , Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik 0293 0294 (1977) 143-203. – 42 –

1977

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [11]

S. R. Das, A. Ghosh, A. Jevicki, K. Suzuki, Space-Time in the SYK Model , JHEP07(2018)184; arXiv:1712.02725

work page Pith review arXiv 2018

[2] [32]

N. K. Chukhrukidze, Asymptotic expansions of Legendre Spherical Functions wit h an imaginary Argument , USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 8 (1968)1-13. – 43 –

work page 1968

[3] [1]

Kitaev, Seminars A simple model of quantum holography

A. Kitaev, Seminars A simple model of quantum holography . Seminars in the KITP Strings and Entanglement program 2015. (Feb. 12, April 7, and May 27, 2015) http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/

work page 2015

[4] [2]

Sachdev, J

S. Sachdev, J. Ye, Gapless spin-ﬂuid ground state in a random quantum Heisenbe rg magnet , Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3339–3342

work page 1993

[5] [3]

Maldacena, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , Phys

J. Maldacena, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 10, 106002; ArXiv:1604.07818

arXiv 2016

[6] [4]

Rosenhaus, An introduction to the SYK model , J

V. Rosenhaus, An introduction to the SYK model , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52 (2019) 323001

work page 2019

[7] [5]

S´ arosi, AdS2 holography and the SYK model , ArXiv:1711.08482

G. S´ arosi, AdS2 holography and the SYK model , ArXiv:1711.08482

arXiv

[8] [6]

Polchinski, V

J. Polchinski, V. Rosenhaus, The Spectrum in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model , JHEP04(2016)001; ArXiv 1601.06768

arXiv 2016