Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Arch-Router: Aligning LLM Routing with Human Preferences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.16655 v1 pith:WWHWBXDL submitted 2025-06-19 cs.CL

Arch-Router: Aligning LLM Routing with Human Preferences

classification cs.CL
keywords routingmodelspreferencesmodelapproachdecisionshumanqueries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

With the rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) -- each optimized for different strengths, style, or latency/cost profile -- routing has become an essential technique to operationalize the use of different models. However, existing LLM routing approaches are limited in two key ways: they evaluate performance using benchmarks that often fail to capture human preferences driven by subjective evaluation criteria, and they typically select from a limited pool of models. In this work, we propose a preference-aligned routing framework that guides model selection by matching queries to user-defined domains (e.g., travel) or action types (e.g., image editing) -- offering a practical mechanism to encode preferences in routing decisions. Specifically, we introduce \textbf{Arch-Router}, a compact 1.5B model that learns to map queries to domain-action preferences for model routing decisions. Our approach also supports seamlessly adding new models for routing without requiring retraining or architectural modifications. Experiments on conversational datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) results in matching queries with human preferences, outperforming top proprietary models. Our approach captures subjective evaluation criteria and makes routing decisions more transparent and flexible. Our model is available at: \texttt{https://huggingface.co/katanemo/Arch-Router-1.5B}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. VDAR-Router: Adaptive LLMs Routing via Verbalized Query Difficulty Analysis Retrieval

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    VDAR-Router improves LLM routing by retrieving past queries with similar verbalized difficulty descriptions and ranking models by performance minus cost.

  2. Agentic Routing: The Harness-Native Data Flywheel

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Step-level, harness-state model routing in OpenSquilla preserves agent quality at far lower cost and turns each decision into environment-labeled data for better routers and specialists.

  3. Adapting Embedding Models for Agent Capability Retrieval

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Fine-tuning three off-the-shelf retrieval models on AgentSelect improved query-to-agent ranking on two unseen marketplace catalogs, MuleRun and ClawHub, across all three model families.

  4. Foundational Design Principles and Patterns for Building Robust and Adaptive GenAI-Native Systems

    cs.SE 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Proposes five foundational pillars and architectural patterns for building robust GenAI-native systems by combining AI with software engineering principles.