Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 71 references

A many-body characterization of the fundamental gap in monolayer CrI$_3$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Diffusion Monte Carlo pins monolayer CrI3's fundamental gap at 2.9 ± 0.1 eV

desk verdict A careful, reproducible DMC estimate of the monolayer CrI3 gap that is probably near the right value, but the quoted 2.9(1) eV overstates precision given the two-point TDL fit and the 0.69 eV spread between gap definitions. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17038 v1 pith:V6LQ4ASE submitted 2025-06-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-elphysics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elphysics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords diffusionMonteCarlofundamentalgapmonolayerCrI32Dmagneticmaterialselectroncorrelationspin-orbitcouplingquasiparticlenaturalorbitals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to settle a long-standing disagreement about the fundamental gap of monolayer CrI3, the first experimentally realized two-dimensional material with intrinsic magnetism. Density functional theory gives gaps between about 0.8 and 1.1 eV, while GW calculations scatter from 2.59 to 3.25 eV, and there is no direct photoemission measurement of the fundamental gap. Using two flavors of diffusion Monte Carlo, the fixed-node and fixed-phase spin-orbit methods, the paper obtains 2.9 ± 0.1 eV. The same value is recovered from both the neutral-promotion and quasiparticle definitions of the gap in the thermodynamic limit, and it agrees with the highest optical reflectance peak and with a recent QSGW calculation. The paper also argues that electron correlation, not spin-orbit coupling, is what controls the gap.

What carries the argument

The key objects are the two gap estimators. The quasiparticle gap $\Delta^{\mathrm{qp}}_f(\Gamma)$ is the ionization potential minus the electron affinity, while the neutral-promotion gap $\Delta^{\mathrm{opt}}_f(\Gamma)$ is the energy of a VBM-to-CBM excitation; in the thermodynamic limit the two are expected to coincide because the promoted electron is delocalized. The calculations use fixed-node DMC with collinear spin determinants and fixed-phase spin-orbit DMC with spinor determinants, both with a Jastrow factor, extrapolated linearly in inverse cell size. A selected configuration-interaction calculation with natural orbitals supplies the supporting analysis: the particle and hole occupations of the excitation are sharply dominated by single orbitals, which justifies single-reference trial wavefunctions.

What would settle it

An angle-resolved photoemission (ARPES) measurement of the quasiparticle gap of freestanding monolayer CrI3 that falls outside 2.8–3.0 eV, or a DMC run at Nf.u.=32 or 54 in which the neutral-promotion and quasiparticle definitions remain separated by more than ≈0.2 eV after extrapolation, would refute the 2.9(1) eV claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the center of the paper is a numerical claim: the fundamental gap of monolayer CrI3 is 2.9(1) eV, obtained with fixed-node and fixed-phase spin-orbit diffusion Monte Carlo using PBE+U(2 eV) Slater-Jastrow trial wavefunctions. Two formally different estimators are computed at the Γ-point: the quasiparticle gap, defined as the difference between the ionization potential and electron affinity, and the neutral-promotion gap, defined as the energy of promoting an electron from the valence-band maximum to the conduction-band maximum. After a two-point linear extrapolation from the 8- and 18-formula-unit supercells, the quasiparticle gap is 2.97 eV and the neutral-promotion gap 2.81 eV, and their average is reported as 2.9(1) eV. Fully relativistic fixed-phase calculations at the largest affordable supercell give the same value within error bars, despite the underlying DFT gap dropping by about 0.5 eV when spin-orbit coupling is included. The authors conclude that electron correlation, not spin-orbit coupling, determines the fundamental gap, and that a single-reference trial wavefunction is adequate for this excitation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the neutral electron promotion from the valence-band maximum to the conduction-band minimum, computed in finite supercells, equals the true fundamental gap once extrapolated to infinite size; at the largest supercell the two definitions still differ by 0.69 eV, and only the two-point extrapolation brings them to 0.16 eV of each other.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The fundamental gap of monolayer CrI3 is 2.9(1) eV, sitting above DFT values and matching the QSGW result of 2.9 eV.
  • Electron correlation, not spin-orbit coupling, controls the gap: adding SOC shifts the underlying DFT gap by about 0.5 eV, while the DMC gap is unchanged within statistical error.
  • In the thermodynamic limit the neutral-promotion gap and the quasiparticle gap coincide, so DMC can use either definition to benchmark fundamental gaps in 2D magnetic insulators.
  • A single-reference Slater-Jastrow trial wavefunction built from PBE+U2.0 orbitals is sufficient for this excitation, as shown by the sharply peaked particle and hole occupations in the natural-orbital basis.
  • The result anchors the optical spectrum: the fundamental gap sits about 0.2 eV above the highest reflectance peak at 2.7 eV, consistent with that peak having little excitonic character.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Taken literally, the 2.9 eV quasiparticle gap and the 2.7 eV optical peak imply an exciton binding energy of roughly 0.2 eV for the VBM-to-CBM-like transition, a quantity that could be checked by two-photon or pump-probe spectroscopy.
  • The same fixed-phase spin-orbit DMC protocol applied to CrBr3 and CrCl3 would test whether the correlation-over-SOC hierarchy is a general feature of chromium trihalide monolayers.
  • The natural-orbital occupation analysis suggests a practical screening rule: when particle and hole occupations of the natural orbitals are sharply dominated by single orbitals, single-reference DMC trial wavefunctions should be trusted for the gap; this could be validated on other open-shell 2D magnets.
  • The roughly 0.2 eV gap between the DMC value and the 2.7 eV optical peak may partly reflect fixed-node bias that overestimates excited-state energies; larger fixed-phase spin-orbit DMC supercells would determine whether the remaining difference is physical or methodological.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents fixed-node (FNDMC) and fixed-phase spin-orbit (FPSODMC) diffusion Monte Carlo calculations of the fundamental gap of monolayer CrI3. The gap is evaluated from two definitions: the quasiparticle gap Δqp (Eq. 3, IP−EA) and the neutral-promotion gap Δopt (Eq. 4), computed in supercells up to 18 formula units. A two-point linear extrapolation in 1/Nf.u. using Nf.u.=8 and 18 gives Δqp=2.97 eV and Δopt=2.81 eV; their average, 2.9(1) eV, is the paper's headline result. The authors compare with optical reflectance (2.7 eV) and GW results, and use CIPSI natural-orbital analysis to argue that the VBM→CBM excitation is essentially single-reference in an appropriate orbital basis.

Significance. If the result is correct, it provides a high-level benchmark for a debated quantity in a magnetic 2D material and demonstrates the feasibility of DMC for such systems. The work has notable strengths: converged DFT/DMC parameters, validation of pseudopotentials against ccECPs, agreement between two independent DMC implementations, consistency with QSGW (2.9 eV), and deposition of input/output data in the Materials Data Facility. The CIPSI density-matrix analysis is a useful diagnostic for justifying single-reference trial wave functions. The main significance lies in the central value 2.9(1) eV and its implication that electron correlation, not SOC, dominates the gap renormalization.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Fig. 2(b), Table 5] The headline value 2.9(1) eV is obtained by averaging the extrapolated Δqp and Δopt, but at the largest computed supercell (Nf.u.=18) these two definitions still differ by 0.69 eV, and after the two-point [8,18] extrapolation they differ by 0.16 eV. The reported ±0.1 eV error bar is smaller than this residual and than the statistical errors of the largest-cell endpoints (e.g., ±0.21 eV on Δqp at Nf.u.=18). A two-point fit cannot distinguish a difference that decays to zero in the TDL from a finite offset due to residual excitonic character, incorrect asymptotic form, or uncorrected charged-cell effects. The text acknowledges that larger supercells are unaffordable; the central claim should either be supported by additional cell sizes, a more conservative error estimate, or a clearly labeled model dependence of the TDL limit.
  2. [Sec. III, Table 4] The FPSODMC TDL value rests on a single supercell (Nf.u.=8) with the assumption that the SR finite-size scaling applies unchanged to the FR data. At that size the FR and SR gaps are statistically indistinguishable (Δqp: 3.49(14) vs 3.59(21); Δopt: 2.283(80) vs 2.24(10)); a few-tenths-of-an-eV shift of the FR curve would change the conclusion that SOC is a minor effect. The statement that 'the same fundamental gap was obtained within statistical error' is a null result with limited power, and it is load-bearing for the paper's second main conclusion. Please either report FR data at additional cell sizes or temper the conclusion to reflect the resolution currently available.
  3. [Sec. II (last paragraph) and Sec. III (Eq. 3)] The quasiparticle gap Δqp involves charged supercells (N±1), which in periodic boundary conditions are subject to image-charge finite-size errors. The authors state explicitly that they do not apply kinetic-, potential-, or gap-corrections and report raw quantities. Since the difference between Δqp and Δopt at Nf.u.=18 (0.69 eV) is the main finite-size residue that the two-point extrapolation must cure, an estimate of the charged-cell correction (e.g., via a model Coulomb interaction or by comparing to a neutral-promotion equivalent) is needed to attribute the convergence to the claimed physical mechanism. Without this, the TDL value of Δqp carries an uncontrolled systematic error.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The acronym 'FNMDC' appears on its first use in the Introduction, but the rest of the paper uses 'FNDMC'; please use a single acronym consistently.
  2. [Fig. 2(a)] The y-axis label 'EDMC/Nf.u.' should be typeset as E_DMC/N_f.u. or replaced with 'DMC energy per formula unit' for clarity.
  3. [Sec. III, after Eq. 4] The sentence 'we take the average of the two approaches, Δqp = 2.97 eV and Δopt = 2.81 eV' is ambiguous: the average is 2.89 eV, while the listed values are the two extrapolated definitions. Please rephrase to read 'averaging the two extrapolated definitions, 2.97 eV and 2.81 eV, gives 2.89 eV.'
  4. [Supplemental Information, Table 6] The energy difference for the excited state between PBE and PBE+U2.0 trial wave functions (0.0014 Ha ≈ 0.04 eV) is small but statistically significant; citing the value in eV would make the claimed significant lowering more transparent.
  5. [Supplemental Information, Tables 3–5] Using the symbol '∞' for the thermodynamic-limit row is unconventional; consider renaming the row 'TDL' to avoid confusion with the 'Nf.u.' header.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the DMC gap is computed from first-principles total-energy differences, with the Hubbard U fixed by ground-state energy minimization and experimental/GW comparisons made post hoc.

full rationale

The central claim, a fundamental gap of 2.9(1) eV, is obtained from DMC total-energy differences via Eq. 3 (quasiparticle definition) and Eq. 4 (neutral-promotion definition), followed by a two-point thermodynamic-limit extrapolation. These are genuine many-body total-energy calculations, not fitted values. The Hubbard U = 2 eV used in the PBE+U trial wavefunction was chosen in prior work to minimize the ground-state energy, not to match the target gap; furthermore, SI Table 6 shows PBE and PBE+U2.0 trial wavefunctions give nearly identical DMC energies, so the trial choice does not force the gap value. The agreement with the 2.7 eV optical peak and previous GW results is a post hoc comparison, not an input to the calculation. The assumptions that Delta_qp and Delta_opt converge to the same thermodynamic-limit value and that the two-point linear extrapolation is adequate are methodological risks, acknowledged by the authors (including the 0.16 eV residual and the absence of kinetic-, potential-, and gap-corrections), but they are not circular reductions: no equation is defined in terms of the target result, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations to prior geometry and U-selection work (Refs. 16, 17, 41) are not load-bearing in a circular sense, because the geometry was externally benchmarked against experiment and the U choice is independent of the fundamental gap and is directly tested for sensitivity. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained, and no specific circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation depends on the fixed-node/fixed-phase approximation, the assumed equivalence of neutral-promotion and quasiparticle gaps in the thermodynamic limit, the Γ-point-only gap approximation, pseudopotential transferability, and vacuum isolation. No new physical entities are introduced. The only hand-chosen numerical input relevant to the central claim is the Hubbard U, selected variationally rather than fitted to the target.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U on Cr = 2 eV
    Used in the PBE+U2.0 trial wavefunction. Chosen in previous work (Refs. 16,17,41) to minimize the FNDMC ground-state energy, not to reproduce the gap; the fixed-node bias in the DMC gap depends on this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Fixed-node and fixed-phase approximations yield accurate total energies and gap differences for ground, excited, cation, and anion states of monolayer CrI3.
    DMC is exact only with the exact nodal surface; the paper assumes the fixed-node/fixed-phase bias is small and similar across the four states used in the gap (Sec. II, Eqs. 1-2).
  • domain assumption The neutral-promotion gap Δopt_f(Γ) equals the fundamental gap in the thermodynamic limit.
    Assumed from Ref. 24 and argued via a delocalized CBM versus localized exciton; used to justify averaging Eq. 3 and Eq. 4 (Sec. III, after Eq. 4).
  • domain assumption The fundamental gap is accurately represented by the Γ-point VBM to CBM promotion even with spin-orbit coupling.
    Bands are flat near Γ and the Γ transition is stated to approximate the true band gap (Sec. III, Fig. 1).
  • domain assumption The RRKJ Cr and BFD I pseudopotentials are transferable and accurate for this system.
    Validated against harder ccECP potentials with DFT gap differences below 0.03 eV (SI Table 2).
  • domain assumption A 25 Å vacuum suppresses spurious interactions between monolayer images.
    Standard 2D simulation practice; stated in Methods.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A many-body characterization of the fundamental gap in monolayer CrI$_3$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V6LQ4ASE

@misc{pith2026250617038,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A many-body characterization of the fundamental gap in monolayer CrI$_3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V6LQ4ASE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17038}
}
abstract

The many-body fixed-node and fixed-phase spin-orbit Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) methods are applied to accurately predict the fundamental gap of monolayer CrI$_3$ - the first experimentally-realized 2D material with intrinsic magnetism. The fundamental gap obtained, 2.9(1)~eV, agrees well with the highest peak in optical spectroscopy measurements and a previous $GW$ result. We numerically show that as expected in DMC the same value of the fundamental gap is obtained in the thermodynamic limit using both neutral promotions and the standard quasiparticle definition of the gap based on the ionization potential and electron affinity. Additional analysis of the differences between density matrices formed in different bases using configuration interaction calculations explains why a single-reference trial wave function can produce an accurate excitation. We find that accounting for electron correlation is more crucial than accounting for spin-orbit effects in determining the fundamental gap. These results highlight how DMC can be used to benchmark 2D material physics and emphasize the importance of using beyond-DFT methods for studying 2D materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17038 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Electronic structure of ML CrI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Finite-size scaling of DMC total energies and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: Fully-relativistic PBE band structures using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Diagonal occupations of the matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Monolayer CrI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The convergence of natural orbitals in ML CrI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author J.-G. \ Park ,\ title title Opportunities and challenges of 2D magnetic van der Waals materials: magnetic graphene? \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/30/301001 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 28 ,\ pages 301001 ( year 2016 ) ,\ note publisher: IOP Publishing NoStop

  2. [2]

    Wang , author D

    author author Z. Wang , author D. Sapkota , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author D. Mandrus ,\ and\ author A. F. \ Morpurgo ,\ title title Tunneling Spin Valves Based on Fe3GeTe2 / hBN / Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals Heterostructures , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01278 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 18 ,\ pages 4303--4308 ( year ...

  3. [3]

    author author V. P. \ Ningrum , author B. Liu , author W. Wang , author Y. Yin , author Y. Cao , author C. Zha , author H. Xie , author X. Jiang , author Y. Sun , author S. Qin , author X. Chen , author T. Qin , author C. Zhu , author L. Wang ,\ and\ author W. Huang ,\ title title Recent Advances in Two - Dimensional Magnets : Physics and Devices towards ...

  4. [4]

    Liu , author Y

    author author P. Liu , author Y. Zhang , author K. Li , author Y. Li ,\ and\ author Y. Pu ,\ title title Recent advances in 2D van der Waals magnets: Detection , modulation, and applications , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107584 journal journal iScience \ volume 26 ,\ pages 107584 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  5. [5]

    Fu , author P

    author author Z. Fu , author P. I. \ Samarawickrama , author J. Ackerman , author Y. Zhu , author Z. Mao , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author W. Wang , author Y. Dahnovsky , author M. Wu , author T. Chien , author J. Tang , author A. H. \ MacDonald , author H. Chen ,\ and\ author J. Tian ,\ title title Tunneling current-controlled spin stat...

  6. [6]

    Elahi , author M

    author author E. Elahi , author M. A. \ Khan , author M. Suleman , author A. Dahshan , author S. Rehman , author H. Waseem Khalil , author M. A. \ Rehman , author A. M. \ Hassan , author G. Koyyada , author J. H. \ Kim ,\ and\ author M. F. \ Khan ,\ title title Recent innovations in 2D magnetic materials and their potential applications in the modern era ...

  7. [7]

    Zhang , author P

    author author B. Zhang , author P. Lu , author R. Tabrizian , author P. X.-L. \ Feng ,\ and\ author Y. Wu ,\ title title 2D Magnetic heterostructures: spintronics and quantum future , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s44306-024-00011-w journal journal npj Spintronics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1--10 ( year 2024 ) ,\ note publisher: Nature Publishing Group NoStop

  8. [8]

    A first-principles study of bilayer 1T'-WTe2/CrI3: A candidate topological spin filter

    author author D. Staros , author P. Ganesh ,\ and\ author B. Rubenstein ,\ title title A first-principles study of bilayer 1 T ’- WT e _2 / C r I _3 as a topological spin filter candidate , \ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.06415 journal journal npj Spintronics \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Wu et al

    author author M. Wu et al. ,\ title title Physical origin of giant excitonic and magneto-optical responses in two-dimensional ferromagnetic insulators , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10325-7 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 10 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  2. [10]

    author author M. A. \ McGuire et al. ,\ title title Coupling of crystal structure and magnetism in the layered, ferromagnetic insulator C r I _3 , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/cm504242t journal journal Chemistry of Materials \ volume 27 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  3. [11]

    Huang et al

    author author B. Huang et al. ,\ title title Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der W aals crystal down to the monolayer limit , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22391 journal journal Nature \ volume 546 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  4. [12]

    Seyler et al

    author author K. Seyler et al. ,\ title title Ligand-field helical luminescence in a 2 D ferromagnetic insulator , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-017-0006-7 journal journal Nature Physics Letters \ volume 14 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  5. [13]

    Molina-Sánchez , author G

    author author A. Molina-Sánchez , author G. Catarina , author D. Sangalli ,\ and\ author J. Fernández-Rossier ,\ title title Magneto-optical response of chromium trihalide monolayers: chemical trends , \ https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TC01322F journal journal Journal of Materials C...

  6. [14]

    Acharya , author D

    author author S. Acharya , author D. Pashov , author B. Cunningham , author A. Rudenko , author M. Rösner , author M. Grüning , author M. van Schilfgaarde ,\ and\ author M. Katsnelson ,\ title title Electronic structure of chromium trihalides beyond density functional theory ,...

  7. [15]

    o m , author M. R \

    author author Y. O. \ Kvashnin , author A. N. \ Rudenko , author P. Thunstr \"o m , author M. R \"o sner ,\ and\ author M. I. \ Katsnelson ,\ title title Dynamical correlations in single-layer CrI _3 , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.205124 journal journal Physical Revi...

  8. [16]

    Staros , author G

    author author D. Staros , author G. Hu , author J. Tiihonen , author R. Nanguneri , author J. Krogel , author C. Bennett , author O. Heinonen , author P. Ganesh ,\ and\ author B. Rubenstein ,\ title title A combined first principles study of the structural, magnetic, and phono...

  9. [17]

    Wines , author K

    author author D. Wines , author K. Choudhary ,\ and\ author F. Tavazza ,\ title title Systematic DFT + U and Quantum Monte Carlo Benchmark of Magnetic Two-Dimensional ( 2D ) CrX3 ( X = I , Br , Cl , F ) , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06733 journal journal The Journal o...

  10. [18]

    author author A. Kutepov ,\ title title Electronic structure of van der Waals ferromagnet CrI _3 from self-consistent vertex corrected GW approaches , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.083805 journal journal Physical Review Materials \ volume 5 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  11. [19]

    author author A. K. \ Kundu , author Y. Liu , author C. Petrovic ,\ and\ author T. Valla ,\ title title Valence band electronic structure of the van der Waals ferromagnetic insulators: VI _3 and CrI _3 , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72487-5 journal journal Scientific R...

  12. [20]

    Latini , author T

    author author S. Latini , author T. Olsen ,\ and\ author K. Thygesen ,\ title title Excitons in van der W aals heterostructures: T he important role of dielectric screening , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.245123 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 92 ( year 2015...

  13. [21]

    author author N. S. \ Blunt \ and\ author E. Neuscamman ,\ title title Excited- State Diffusion Monte Carlo Calculations : A Simple and Efficient Two - Determinant Ansatz , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00879 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ ...

  14. [22]

    Mostaani , author B

    author author E. Mostaani , author B. Monserrat , author N. D. \ Drummond ,\ and\ author C. J. \ Lambert ,\ title title Quasiparticle and excitonic gaps of one-dimensional carbon chains , \ https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP07891A journal journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics ...

  15. [23]

    Frank , author R

    author author T. Frank , author R. Derian , author K. Tokár , author L. Mitas , author J. Fabian ,\ and\ author I. Štich ,\ title title Many- Body Quantum Monte Carlo Study of 2D Materials : Cohesion and Band Gap in Single - Layer Phosphorene , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRe...

  16. [24]

    Dubecký , author F

    author author M. Dubecký , author F. Karlický , author S. Minárik ,\ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title Fundamental gap of fluorographene by many-body GW and fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo methods , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0030952 journal journal The Journal of Chemical...

  17. [25]

    Shin et al

    author author H. Shin et al. ,\ title title Optimized structure and electronic band gap of monolayer GeSe from quantum Monte Carlo methods , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.024002 journal journal Physical Review Materials \ volume 5 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  18. [26]

    Wines , author J

    author author D. Wines , author J. Ahn , author A. Benali , author P. R. C. \ Kent , author J. T. \ Krogel , author Y. Kwon , author L. Mitas , author F. A. \ Reboredo , author B. Rubenstein , author K. Saritas , author H. Shin , author I. S tich ,\ and\ author C. Ataca ,\ @no...

  19. [27]

    author author C. A. \ Melton \ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title Many-body electronic structure of LaScO _3 by real-space quantum Monte Carlo , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.045103 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 102 ,\ pages 045103 ( year 2020 ) ,\ note ...

  20. [28]

    Foulkes , author L

    author author W. Foulkes , author L. Mitas , author R. Needs ,\ and\ author G. Rajagopal ,\ title title Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.73.33 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 73 ,\ pages 33--83 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

  21. [29]

    author author C. A. \ Melton , author M. C. \ Bennett ,\ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title Quantum Monte Carlo with variable spins , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4954726 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 144 ,\ pages 244113 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  22. [30]

    author author C. A. \ Melton \ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title Fixed- Node and Fixed - Phase Approximations and Their Relationship to Variable Spins in Quantum Monte Carlo , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2016-1234.ch001 booktitle Recent Progress in Quantum Monte Carlo ,...

  23. [31]

    author author C. A. \ Melton , author M. Zhu , author S. Guo , author A. Ambrosetti , author F. Pederiva ,\ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title Spin-orbit interactions in electronic structure quantum Monte Carlo methods , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.042502 journal jo...

  24. [32]

    author author C. A. \ Melton \ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title Quantum Monte Carlo with variable spins: Fixed -phase and fixed-node approximations , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.043305 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 96 ,\ pages 043305 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  25. [33]

    author author C. A. \ Melton , author M. C. \ Bennett ,\ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title Projector quantum Monte Carlo with averaged vs explicit spin-orbit effects: Applications to tungsten molecular systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.12.033 journal journal Jo...

  26. [34]

    author author J. T. \ Krogel , author J. A. \ Santana ,\ and\ author F. A. \ Reboredo ,\ title title Pseudopotentials for quantum Monte Carlo studies of transition metal oxides , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.075143 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 93 ,\ page...

  27. [35]

    Burkatzki , author C

    author author M. Burkatzki , author C. Filippi ,\ and\ author M. Dolg ,\ title title Energy-consistent pseudopotentials for quantum Monte Carlo calculations , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2741534 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 126 ,\ pages 234105 ( yea...

  28. [36]

    Kincaid , author G

    author author B. Kincaid , author G. Wang , author H. Zhou ,\ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title Correlation consistent effective core potentials for late 3d transition metals adapted for plane wave calculations , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0109098 journal journal The Journa...

  29. [37]

    Wang , author B

    author author G. Wang , author B. Kincaid , author H. Zhou , author A. Annaberdiyev , author M. C. \ Bennett , author J. T. \ Krogel ,\ and\ author L. Mitas ,\ title title A new generation of effective core potentials from correlated and spin--orbit calculations: Selected heav...

  30. [38]

    Giannozzi et al

    author author P. Giannozzi et al. ,\ title title QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 21 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

  31. [39]

    Giannozzi et al

    author author P. Giannozzi et al. ,\ title title Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 29 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  32. [40]

    Perdew , author K

    author author J. Perdew , author K. Burke ,\ and\ author M. Ernzerhof ,\ title title Generalized gradient approximation made simple , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 77 ( year 1996 ),\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 NoStop

  33. [41]

    Ichibha et al

    author author T. Ichibha et al. ,\ title title Cr I _3 revisited with a many-body ab initio theoretical approach , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.064006 journal journal Physical Review Materials \ volume 5 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  34. [42]

    Kim et al

    author author J. Kim et al. ,\ title title QMCPACK : an open source ab initio quantum Monte Carlo package for the electronic structure of atoms, molecules and solids , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aab9c3 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 30 (...

  35. [43]

    Kent et al

    author author P. Kent et al. ,\ title title QMCPACK : Advances in the development, efficiency, and application of auxiliary field and real-space variational and diffusion quantum Monte Carlo , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004860 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ...

  36. [44]

    author author J. Krogel ,\ title title Nexus: A modular workflow management system for quantum simulation codes , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.08.012 journal journal Computer Physics Communications \ volume 198 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  37. [45]

    Casula et al

    author author M. Casula et al. ,\ title title Size-consistent variational approaches to nonlocal pseudopotentials: Standard and lattice regularized diffusion Monte Carlo methods revisited , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3380831 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ v...

  38. [46]

    author author A. L. \ Dzubak , author J. T. \ Krogel ,\ and\ author F. A. \ Reboredo ,\ title title Quantitative estimation of 3d transition metal pseudopotentials in diffusion Monte Carlo , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4991414 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ ...

  39. [47]

    Chiesa , author D

    author author S. Chiesa , author D. M. \ Ceperley , author R. M. \ Martin ,\ and\ author M. Holzmann ,\ title title Finite- Size Error in Many - Body Simulations with Long - Range Interactions , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.076404 journal journal Physical Review Le...

  40. [48]

    author author L. M. \ Fraser , author W. M. C. \ Foulkes , author G. Rajagopal , author R. J. \ Needs , author S. D. \ Kenny ,\ and\ author A. J. \ Williamson ,\ title title Finite-size effects and Coulomb interactions in quantum Monte Carlo calculations for homogeneous system...

  41. [49]

    author author A. J. \ Williamson , author G. Rajagopal , author R. J. \ Needs , author L. M. \ Fraser , author W. M. C. \ Foulkes , author Y. Wang ,\ and\ author M.-Y. \ Chou ,\ title title Elimination of Coulomb finite-size effects in quantum many-body simulations , \ https:/...

  42. [50]

    author author P. R. C. \ Kent , author R. Q. \ Hood , author A. J. \ Williamson , author R. J. \ Needs , author W. M. C. \ Foulkes ,\ and\ author G. Rajagopal ,\ title title Finite-size errors in quantum many-body simulations of extended systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/Phy...

  43. [51]

    author author R. J. \ Hunt , author M. Szyniszewski , author G. I. \ Prayogo , author R. Maezono ,\ and\ author N. D. \ Drummond ,\ title title Quantum monte carlo calculations of energy gaps from first principles , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.075122 journal journal ...

  44. [52]

    Adamo , author M

    author author C. Adamo , author M. Cossi ,\ and\ author V. Barone ,\ title title An accurate density functional method for the study of magnetic properties: the pbe0 model , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-1280(99)00235-3 journal journal Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHE...

  45. [53]

    Becke ,\ title title Density‐functional thermochemistry

    author author D. Becke ,\ title title Density‐functional thermochemistry. iii. the role of exact exchange , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913 journal journal Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 98 ,\ pages 5648–5652 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

  46. [54]

    author author J. P. \ Perdew , author W. Yang , author K. Burke , author Z. Yang , author E. K. U. \ Gross , author M. Scheffler , author G. E. \ Scuseria , author T. M. \ Henderson , author I. Y. \ Zhang , author A. Ruzsinszky , author H. Peng , author J. Sun , author E. Trus...

  47. [55]

    Holzmann et al

    author author M. Holzmann et al. ,\ title title Theory of finite size effects for electronic quantum Monte Carlo calculations of liquids and solids , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.035126 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 94 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  48. [56]

    Annaberdiyev et al

    author author A. Annaberdiyev et al. ,\ title title Cohesion and excitations of diamond-structure silicon by quantum Monte Carlo : Benchmarks and control of systematic biases. \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.205206 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 103 ( year 2...

  49. [57]

    Gaufr \`e s , author F

    author author E. Gaufr \`e s , author F. Fossard , author V. Gosselin , author L. Sponza , author F. Ducastelle , author Z. Li , author S. G. \ Louie , author R. Martel , author M. C \^o t \'e ,\ and\ author A. Loiseau ,\ title title Momentum- Resolved Dielectric Response of F...

  50. [58]

    author author H. R. \ Larsson , author H. Zhai , author C. J. \ Umrigar ,\ and\ author G. K.-L. \ Chan ,\ title title The Chromium Dimer : Closing a Chapter of Quantum Chemistry , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c06357 journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \...

  51. [59]

    Li , author Y

    author author J. Li , author Y. Yao , author A. A. \ Holmes , author M. Otten , author Q. Sun , author S. Sharma ,\ and\ author C. J. \ Umrigar ,\ title title Accurate many-body electronic structure near the basis set limit: Application to the chromium dimer , \ https://doi.or...

  52. [60]

    Purwanto , author S

    author author W. Purwanto , author S. Zhang ,\ and\ author H. Krakauer ,\ title title An auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo study of the chromium dimer , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4906829 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 142 ,\ pages 064302 ( year 20...

  53. [61]

    Head-Gordon , author A

    author author M. Head-Gordon , author A. M. \ Grana , author D. Maurice ,\ and\ author C. A. \ White ,\ title title Analysis of Electronic Transitions as the Difference of Electron Attachment and Detachment Densities , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/j100039a012 journal journal The ...

  54. [62]

    Shin , author K

    author author H. Shin , author K. Gasperich , author T. Rojas , author A. T. \ Ngo , author J. T. \ Krogel ,\ and\ author A. Benali ,\ title title Systematic Improvement of Quantum Monte Carlo Calculations in Transition Metal Oxides : sCI-Driven Wavefunction Optimization for R...

  55. [63]

    author author Y. e. a. \ Garniron ,\ title title Hybrid stochastic-deterministic calculation of the second-order perturbative contribution of multireference perturbation theory , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4992127 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  56. [64]

    Garniron , author T

    author author Y. Garniron , author T. Applencourt , author K. Gasperich , author A. Benali , author A. Ferté , author J. Paquier , author B. Pradines , author R. Assaraf , author P. Reinhardt , author J. Toulouse , author P. Barbaresco , author N. Renon , author G. David , aut...

  57. [65]

    author author Q. e. a. \ Sun ,\ title title Pyscf: the python-based simulations of chemistry framework , \ https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1340 journal journal WIREs Computational Molecular Science \ ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  58. [66]

    author author Q. e. a. \ Sun ,\ title title Recent developments in the pyscf program package , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0006074 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  59. [67]

    Benali et al

    author author A. Benali et al. ,\ title title Toward a systematic improvement of the fixed-node approximation in diffusion Monte Carlo for solids — a case study in diamond , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0021036 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 153 ( year...

  60. [68]

    Blaiszik , author K

    author author B. Blaiszik , author K. Chard , author J. Pruyne , author R. Ananthakrishnan , author S. Tuecke ,\ and\ author I. Foster ,\ title title The Materials Data Facility : Data Services to Advance Materials Science Research , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2001-3...

  61. [69]

    Blaiszik , author L

    author author B. Blaiszik , author L. Ward , author M. Schwarting , author J. Gaff , author R. Chard , author D. Pike , author K. Chard ,\ and\ author I. Foster ,\ title title A data ecosystem to support machine learning in materials science , \ https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.201...

  62. [70]

    A many-body characterization of the fundamental gap in monolayer CrI3

    author author D. Staros , author K. Gasperich , author A. Annaberdiyev , author A. Benali , author P. Ganesh ,\ and\ author B. Rubenstein ,\ title title Dataset for "A many-body characterization of the fundamental gap in monolayer CrI3" , \ https://doi.org/10.18126/x1fk-8710 1...

  63. [71]

    Huron , author J

    author author B. Huron , author J. Malrieu ,\ and\ author P. Rancurel ,\ title title Iterative perturbation calculations of ground and excited state energies from multiconfigurational zeroth‐order wavefunctions , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1679199 journal journal The Journal ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.