Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Large Language Models for Spreadsheets: Benchmarking Progress and Evaluating Performance with FLARE

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.17330 v1 pith:GCWLSTE3 submitted 2025-06-19 cs.SE

Large Language Models for Spreadsheets: Benchmarking Progress and Evaluating Performance with FLARE

classification cs.SE
keywords tasksspreadsheetllmsreasoningbenchmarkformulaperformanceauditing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated some significant capabilities across various domains; however, their effectiveness in spreadsheet related tasks remains underexplored. This study introduces a foundation for a comprehensive benchmark framework to evaluate the performance of leading LLMs in executing spreadsheet functions, formula generation and data manipulation tasks. The benchmark encompasses tasks ranging from basic formula creation to complex, real world spreadsheet scenarios. Our findings reveal that while LLMs exhibit proficiency in straightforward tasks, they often falter in complex, multi step operations, frequently producing plausible yet incorrect outputs. These results underscore the limitations of current LLMs in handling spreadsheet tasks that require precise logical reasoning and highlight the need for integrating symbolic reasoning capabilities into LLM architectures. To support this, we introduce FLARE (Formula Logic, Auditing, Reasoning and Evaluation) a new benchmark for evaluating LLM performance on real-world spreadsheet logic, auditing, and reasoning tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SpreadsheetBench 2: Evaluating Agents on End-to-End Business Spreadsheet Workflows

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SpreadsheetBench 2 provides 321 expert-validated tasks from authentic business data showing frontier LLMs reach only 34.89% overall accuracy on end-to-end spreadsheet workflows.

  2. FrontierFinance: A Long-Horizon Computer-Use Benchmark of Real-World Financial Tasks

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FrontierFinance benchmark shows human financial experts outperform state-of-the-art LLMs by achieving higher scores and more client-ready outputs on realistic long-horizon tasks.