Pith. sign in

REVIEW 81 references

A Spatio-Temporal Point Process for Fine-Grained Modeling of Reading Behavior

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.19999 v1 pith:W2KBTDKT submitted 2025-06-24 cs.LG cs.CLq-bio.NC

Francesco Ignazio Re , Andreas Opedal , Glib Manaiev , Mario Giulianelli , Ryan Cotterell This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGcs.CLq-bio.NC
keywords processtimefixationpointreadingsaccadesspacefixations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reading is a process that unfolds across space and time, alternating between fixations where a reader focuses on a specific point in space, and saccades where a reader rapidly shifts their focus to a new point. An ansatz of psycholinguistics is that modeling a reader's fixations and saccades yields insight into their online sentence processing. However, standard approaches to such modeling rely on aggregated eye-tracking measurements and models that impose strong assumptions, ignoring much of the spatio-temporal dynamics that occur during reading. In this paper, we propose a more general probabilistic model of reading behavior, based on a marked spatio-temporal point process, that captures not only how long fixations last, but also where they land in space and when they take place in time. The saccades are modeled using a Hawkes process, which captures how each fixation excites the probability of a new fixation occurring near it in time and space. The duration time of fixation events is modeled as a function of fixation-specific predictors convolved across time, thus capturing spillover effects. Empirically, our Hawkes process model exhibits a better fit to human saccades than baselines. With respect to fixation durations, we observe that incorporating contextual surprisal as a predictor results in only a marginal improvement in the model's predictive accuracy. This finding suggests that surprisal theory struggles to explain fine-grained eye movements.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    online" 'onlinestring :=

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint eprinttype howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year doi pubmed url lastchecked label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block STRING...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    Christoph Aurnhammer and Stefan L. Frank. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107198 Evaluating information-theoretic measures of word prediction in naturalistic sentence reading . Neuropsychologia, 134:107198

    arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Maria Barrett, Ana Valeria Gonz \'a lez-Gardu \ n o, Lea Frermann, and Anders S gaard. 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1184 Unsupervised induction of linguistic categories with records of reading, speaking, and writing . In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North A merican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Langu...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1184 2018

  5. [5]

    Yevgeni Berzak and Roger Levy. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00084 Eye movement traces of linguistic knowledge in native and non-native reading . Open Mind, 7:179--196

    work page doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00084 2023

  6. [6]

    Klinton Bicknell and Roger Levy. 2010. https://aclanthology.org/P10-1119/ A rational model of eye movement control in reading . In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1168--1178. Association for Computational Linguistics

    2010

  7. [7]

    Lena Bolliger, David Reich, Patrick Haller, Deborah Jakobi, Paul Prasse, and Lena J \"a ger. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.960 S can DL : A diffusion model for generating synthetic scanpaths on texts . In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 15513--15538. Association for Computat...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.960 2023

  8. [8]

    Bolliger, David R

    Lena S. Bolliger, David R. Reich, and Lena A. J\" a ger. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3725830 Scandl 2.0: A generative model of eye movements in reading synthesizing scanpaths and fixation durations . Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3)

    work page doi:10.1145/3725830 2025

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    Alex Boyd, Robert Bamler, Stephan Mandt, and Padhraic Smyth. 2020. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/f56de5ef149cf0aedcc8f4797031e229-Paper.pdf User-dependent neural sequence models for continuous-time event data . In Advances in Neural Information Pro...

    2020

  2. [10]

    Cruz Heredia, Philip Resnik, Jonathan Z Simon, and Ellen Lau

    Christian Brodbeck, Shohini Bhattasali, Aura A.L. Cruz Heredia, Philip Resnik, Jonathan Z Simon, and Ellen Lau. 2022. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72056 Parallel processing in speech perception with local and global representations of linguistic context . eLife, 11:e72056

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Charles Clifton, Adrian Staub, and Keith Rayner. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50017-3 Eye movements in reading words and sentences . In Roger P., G. Van Gompel , Martin H. Fischer, Wayne S. Murray, and Robin L. Hill, editors, Eye Movements, chapter 15, pages ...

    2007 doi

  4. [12]

    Cook and Wei Wei

    Anne E. Cook and Wei Wei. 2019. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31735846/ What can eye movements tell us about higher level comprehension? Vision, 3(3)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Daley and David Vere-Jones

    Daryl J. Daley and David Vere-Jones. 1988. https://books.google.ch/books?id=Nw4jt9HIa7AC An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes . Probability and its applications. Springer-Verlag

    1988

  6. [14]

    Andrea Gregor de Varda, Marco Marelli, and Simona Amenta. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02261-8 Cloze probability, predictability ratings, and computational estimates for 205 E nglish sentences, aligned with existing EEG and reading time data . Behavior Research Met...

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Vera Demberg and Frank Keller. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.008 Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity . Cognition, 109(2):193--210

    2008 doi

  8. [16]

    Kate Ehrlich and Keith Rayner. 1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80007-3 Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: E ye movements and immediacy of processing . Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1):75--87

    1983 doi

  9. [17]

    Richter, and Reinhold Kliegl

    Ralf Engbert, Antje Nuthmann, Eike M. Richter, and Reinhold Kliegl. 2005. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16262468/ SWIFT : A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading . Psychological Review, 112(4):777--813

    2005

  10. [18]

    Findlay and Robin Walker

    John M. Findlay and Robin Walker. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002150 A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition . Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4):661–674

    1999 doi

  11. [19]

    Frank, Irene Fernandez Monsalve, René L

    Stephan L. Frank, Irene Fernandez Monsalve, René L. Thompson, and Gabriella Vigliocco. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0313-y Reading time data for evaluating broad-coverage models of E nglish sentence processing . Behavior Research Methods, 45:1182--1190

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    Lyn Frazier and Keith Rayner. 1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1 Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences . Cognitive Psychology, 14(2):178--210

    1982 doi

  13. [21]

    Karl Friston and Stefan Kiebel. 2009. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2008.0300 Predictive coding under the free-energy principle . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364(1521):1211--1221

    2009

  14. [22]

    Tian Gao, Dharmashankar Subramanian, Debarun Bhattacharjya, Xiao Shou, Nicholas Mattei, and Kristin P. Bennett. 2021. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2021/file/9078f2a8254704bd760460f027072e52-Paper.pdf Causal inference for event pairs in multivariate point pr...

    2021

  15. [23]

    Mario Giulianelli, Luca Malagutti, Juan Luis Gastaldi, Brian DuSell, Tim Vieira, and Ryan Cotterell. 2024 a . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.1032 On the proper treatment of tokenization in psycholinguistics . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Meth...

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Mario Giulianelli, Andreas Opedal, and Ryan Cotterell. 2024 b . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.682 Generalized measures of anticipation and responsivity in online language processing . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 11648--...

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    Adam Goodkind and Klinton Bicknell. 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-0102 Predictive power of word surprisal for reading times is a linear function of language model quality . In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics, pages 10...

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    Keren Gruteke Klein, Yoav Meiri, Omer Shubi, and Yevgeni Berzak. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.conll-1.17 The effect of surprisal on reading times in information seeking and repeated reading . In Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Computational Natural Language Lea...

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    Michael Hahn and Frank Keller. 2016. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1009 Modeling human reading with neural attention . In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 85--95. Association for Computational Linguistics

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    John Hale. 2001. https://aclanthology.org/N01-1021 A probabilistic E arley parser as a psycholinguistic model . In Second Meeting of the North A merican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

    2001

  21. [29]

    Alan G. Hawkes. 1971. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2334319 Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes . Biometrika, 58(1):83--90

    1971

  22. [30]

    Nora Hollenstein, Itziar Gonzalez-Dios, Lisa Beinborn, and Lena J \"a ger. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.cogalex-1.1 Patterns of text readability in human and predicted eye movements . In Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of the Lexicon, pages 1--15. As...

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    Albrecht Werner Inhoff. 1984. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90382-7 Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose . Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(5):612--624

    1984 doi

  24. [32]

    Taiichiro Ishida and Mitsuo Ikeda. 1989. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.6.001624 Temporal properties of information extraction in reading studied by a text-mask replacement technique . Journal of the Optical Society of America, 6(10):1624--1632

    1989 doi

  25. [33]

    Just and Patricia A

    Marcel A. Just and Patricia A. Carpenter. 1980. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/7413885 A theory of reading: F rom eye fixations to comprehension . Psychological review, 87(4):329—354

    1980

  26. [34]

    Reinhold Kliegl. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.530 Toward a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading: A reply to R ayner, P ollatsek, D rieghe, S lattery, and R eichle (2007) . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3):530--537

    2007 doi

  27. [35]

    Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Yohei Oseki, and Timothy Baldwin. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.129 Psychometric predictive power of large language models . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1983--2005. Association for Computation...

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Yohei Oseki, Takumi Ito, Ryo Yoshida, Masayuki Asahara, and Kentaro Inui. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.405 Lower perplexity is not always human-like . In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguis...

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Yohei Oseki, Souhaib Ben Taieb, Kentaro Inui, and Timothy Baldwin. 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01615 Large language models are human-like internally . Preprint, arXiv:2502.01615

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Roger Levy. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006 Expectation-based syntactic comprehension . Cognition, 106(3):1126--1177

    2008 doi

  31. [39]

    Lima and Albrecht W

    Susan D. Lima and Albrecht W. Inhoff. 1985. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.11.3.272 Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word-initial letter sequence . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(3)

    1985 doi

  32. [40]

    David Marr. 1982. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262514620.001.0001 Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information . Henry Holt and Company

    1982

  33. [41]

    McConkie

    George W. McConkie. 1979. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0994-9_2 On the Role and Control of Eye Movements in Reading , pages 37--48. Springer US

    1979 doi

  34. [42]

    Hongyuan Mei and Jason Eisner. 2017. http://cs.jhu.edu/ jason/papers/#mei-eisner-2017 The neural H awkes process: A neurally self-modulating multivariate point process . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 6754--6764

    2017

  35. [43]

    Sebastian Meyer, Johannes Elias, and Michael H \"o hle. 2012. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21981412/ A space-time conditional intensity model for invasive meningococcal disease occurrence . Biometrics, 68(2):607--616

    2012

  36. [44]

    Mohler, Martin B

    George O. Mohler, Martin B. Short, P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Frederic Paik Schoenberg, and George E. Tita. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.ap09546 Self-exciting point process modeling of crime . Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(493):100--108

    2011 doi

  37. [45]

    Piantadosi

    Francis Mollica and Steven T. Piantadosi. 2017. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/86g6r9nr An incremental information-theoretic buffer supports sentence processing . In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, volume 39

    2017

  38. [46]

    Yurii Nesterov. 1983. https://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=dan&paperid=46009&option_lang=eng A method for solving the convex programming problem with convergence rate O (1/k^2 ) . In Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, volume 269, pages 543--547

    1983

  39. [47]

    Mattias Nilsson and Joakim Nivre. 2009. https://aclanthology.org/W09-1113/ Learning where to look: Modeling eye movements in reading . In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 93--101. Association for Computational Linguistics

    2009

  40. [48]

    Kimia Noorbakhsh and Manuel Rodriguez. 2022. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/9d3faa41886997cfc2128b930077fa49-Paper-Conference.pdf Counterfactual temporal point processes . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 24810--24823

    2022

  41. [49]

    Dennis Norris. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.113.2.327 The bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal bayesian decision process . Psychological Review, 113(2):327--357

    2006 doi

  42. [50]

    Yosihiko Ogata. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8677-2_14 Seismicity Analysis through Point-process Modeling: A Review , pages 471--507. Birkh \"a user Basel

    1999 doi

  43. [51]

    Byung-Doh Oh and William Schuler. 2023. https://direct.mit.edu/tacl/article/doi/10.1162/tacl_a_00548/115371/Why-Does-Surprisal-From-Larger-Transformer-Based Why does surprisal from larger transformer-based language models provide a poorer fit to human reading times? Transactio...

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    Chiebuka Ohams, Sathvik Nair, Shohini Bhattasali, and Philip Resnik. 2025. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ugzyx_v1 A predictive coding model for online sentence processing

    2025 doi

  45. [53]

    Andreas Opedal, Eleanor Chodroff, Ryan Cotterell, and Ethan Wilcox. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.179 On the role of context in reading time prediction . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3042--...

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. 2019. https://d4mucfpksywv.cloudfront.net/better-language-models/language-models.pdf Language models are unsupervised multitask learners . OpenAI blog, 1(8):9

    2019

  47. [55]

    Keith Rayner. 1998. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research . Psychological bulletin, 124(3)

    1998 doi

  48. [56]

    Sereno, Robin K

    Keith Rayner, Sara C. Sereno, Robin K. Morris, A. Réne Schmauder, and Charles Clifton Jr. 1989. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968908406362 Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes . Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3-4):SI21--SI49

    1989 doi

  49. [57]

    Keith Rayner, Timothy J Slattery, Denis Drieghe, and Simon P Liversedge. 2011. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0020990 Eye movements and word skipping during reading: E ffects of word length and predictability . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Per...

    2011 doi

  50. [58]

    Slowiaczek, Charles Clifton, and James H

    Keith Rayner, Maria L. Slowiaczek, Charles Clifton, and James H. Bertera. 1983. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.9.6.912 Latency of sequential eye movements: I mplications for reading . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(6):912—922

    1983 doi

  51. [59]

    Reichle, Keith Rayner, and Alexander Pollatsek

    Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner, and Alexander Pollatsek. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X03000104 The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models . Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(4):445–476

    2003 doi

  52. [60]

    Alex Reinhart. 2018. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26770999 A review of self-exciting spatio-temporal point processes and their applications . Statistical Science, 33(3):299--318

    2018

  53. [61]

    Herbert Robbins and Sutton Monro. 1951. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729586 A stochastic approximation method . The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(3):400--407

    1951

  54. [62]

    Leah Roberts and Anna Siyanova-Chanturia. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000861 Using eye-tracking to investigate topics in L2 acquisition and L2 processing . Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2):213–235

    2013 doi

  55. [63]

    Salthouse and Cecil L

    Timothy A. Salthouse and Cecil L. Ellis. 1980. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422228 Determinants of eye-fixation duration . The American journal of psychology, 93(2):207—234

    1980 doi

  56. [64]

    Cory Shain, Clara Meister, Tiago Pimentel, Ryan Cotterell, and Roger Levy. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2307876121 Large-scale evidence for logarithmic effects of word predictability on reading time . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(10):e2307876121

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    Cory Shain and William Schuler. 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1288 Deconvolutional time series regression: A technique for modeling temporally diffuse effects . In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2679--2689....

    2018 doi

  58. [66]

    Cory Shain and William Schuler. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104735 Continuous-time deconvolutional regression for psycholinguistic modeling . Cognition, 215:104735

    2021

  59. [67]

    Claude E. Shannon. 1948. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6773024 A mathematical theory of communication . The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3):379--423

    1948

  60. [68]

    Oleh Shliazhko, Alena Fenogenova, Maria Tikhonova, Anastasia Kozlova, Vladislav Mikhailov, and Tatiana Shavrina. 2024. https://direct.mit.edu/tacl/article/doi/10.1162/tacl_a_00633/119278/mGPT-Few-Shot-Learners-Go-Multilingual mGPT: Few-Shot Learners Go Multilingual . Transacti...

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    Noam Siegelman, Sascha Schroeder, Cengiz Acart \"u rk, Hee-Don Ahn, Svetlana Alexeeva, Simona Amenta, Raymond Bertram, Rolando Bonandrini, Marc Brysbaert, Daria Chernova, et al. 2022. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-021-01772-6 Expanding horizons of cross-ling...

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    Smith and Roger Levy

    Nathaniel J. Smith and Roger Levy. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013 The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic . Cognition, 128(3):302--319

    2013 doi

  63. [71]

    Ekta Sood, Simon Tannert, Diego Frassinelli, Andreas Bulling, and Ngoc Thang Vu. 2020 a . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.conll-1.2 Interpreting attention models with human visual attention in machine reading comprehension . In Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Computatio...

    2020 doi

  64. [72]

    Ekta Sood, Simon Tannert, Philipp Mueller, and Andreas Bulling. 2020 b . https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/460191c72f67e90150a093b4585e7eb4-Paper.pdf Improving natural language processing tasks with human gaze-guided neural attention . In Advances in N...

    2020

  65. [73]

    Robyn Speer. 2022. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7199437 rspeer/wordfreq: v3.0

    2022 doi

  66. [74]

    O'Donnell, and Ryan Cotterell

    Tim Vieira, Ben LeBrun, Mario Giulianelli, Juan Luis Gastaldi, Brian DuSell, John Terilla, Timothy J. O'Donnell, and Ryan Cotterell. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03719 From language models over tokens to language models over characters . In Forty-Second International Confe...

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Xiaoming Wang, Xinbo Zhao, and Jinchang Ren. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8641074 A new type of eye movement model based on recurrent neural networks for simulating the gaze behavior of human reading . Complexity, 2019(1):8641074

    2019 doi

  68. [76]

    Wilcox, Tiago Pimentel, Clara Meister, Ryan Cotterell, and Roger P

    Ethan G. Wilcox, Tiago Pimentel, Clara Meister, Ryan Cotterell, and Roger P. Levy. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00612 Testing the predictions of surprisal theory in 11 languages . Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 11:1451--1470

    2023 doi

  69. [77]

    Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox, Jon Gauthier, Jennifer Hu, Peng Qian, and Roger Levy. 2020. https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci20/papers/0375/0375.pdf On the predictive power of neural language models for human real-time comprehension behavior . In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual ...

    2020

  70. [78]

    Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox, Tiago Pimentel, Clara Meister, and Ryan Cotterell. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105765 An information-theoretic analysis of targeted regressions during reading . Cognition, 249:105765

    2024

  71. [79]

    Weijie Xu, Jason Chon, Tianran Liu, and Richard Futrell. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.1052 The linearity of the effect of surprisal on reading times across languages . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 15711--15721. As...

    2023 doi

  72. [80]

    Yizhou Zhang, Defu Cao, and Yan Liu. 2022. https://openreview.net/pdf?id=bQCOA4dq_T Counterfactual neural temporal point process for estimating causal influence of misinformation on social media . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35

    2022

  73. [81]

    Zingale and Eileen Kowler

    Carolina M. Zingale and Eileen Kowler. 1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(87)90210-0 Planning sequences of saccades . Vision Research, 27(8):1327--1341

    1987 doi

Pith tools