Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Measurements in stochastic gravity and thermal variance

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Thermal photon noise is the variance of metric fluctuations in the measurement scheme.

desk verdict Genuinely new thermal noise kernels for Maxwell in FLRW, and a clean Fewster-Verch variance identity that is exact only within the order-reduced theory the authors themselves flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23193 v1 pith:D4T7664M submitted 2025-06-29 gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Markus B. Fröb , Dražen Glavan , Paolo Meda This is my paper
classification gr-qchep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 81T2083C4783F0581T55 PACS 04.62.+v04.60.-m98.80.-k
keywords stochasticgravityEinstein–LangevinequationthermalnoisekernelconformallystateMaxwellfieldoncurvedspacetimemetricperturbationvariancequantummeasurementinFLRWcosmology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the quantum fluctuations of a hot photon gas in an expanding universe are not just a source of noise in the gravitational field equations, but are exactly the variance of the metric fluctuations that a local measurement would see. It works in a flat Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker spacetime with a conformally invariant Maxwell field prepared in a conformally thermal state, a thermal equilibrium state that reduces to the conformal vacuum at zero temperature. After computing the thermal stress-energy tensor and showing that the background solution approximates a radiation-dominated universe, the authors derive explicit formulas for the thermal noise kernel in the large-temperature, small-temperature, and small-momentum limits. The central result is an identity: the variance of the induced linearized metric perturbation equals $\kappa^2/4$ times the thermal noise kernel smeared with the probe test tensor. If correct, this gives a quantitative, covariant lower bound on the accuracy of any measurement of metric fluctuations driven by thermal quantum matter.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the thermal noise kernel $K^\beta_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$: the connected two-point function of the centered quantum stress-energy tensor in the conformally thermal state. Its symmetric part is the variance of the Gaussian stochastic source in the Einstein–Langevin equation. The second load-bearing object is the causal propagator $G^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$ of the linearized Einstein equation, obtained after an order-reduction step that drops higher-derivative curvature terms, which is used to solve the induced perturbation $h_{\rm ind} = \frac{\kappa}{2} G \cdot \xi$. The measurement-theoretic link is the scattering morphism $\Theta = {\rm id} + G\cdot\xi$ of the local covariant measurement scheme, which converts a probe observable into an induced system observable; Theorem 5.1 then shows that smearing the noise kernel with copies of the propagator gives the variance formula (5.23).

What would settle it

Compute the causal propagator of the full linearized Einstein–Langevin equation while keeping the higher-derivative curvature tensors $A^{(1)}_{\mu\nu}$ and $B^{(1)}_{\mu\nu}$, square it against the thermal noise kernel for a compactly supported probe observable, and compare with (5.23); any significant difference, especially runaway or unstable modes that grow with time, would falsify the identity. A simpler probe is the de Sitter limit, where the order-reduced and full propagators are known explicitly and the two variances can be compared directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the stochastic noise entering the Einstein–Langevin equation for a conformally thermal Maxwell field has a measurement-theoretic meaning: it is the variance of the induced linearized metric perturbation in the local and covariant measurement scheme. Concretely, if the target field is the thermal stochastic noise $\xi^\beta_{\mu\nu}$ and the probe is the linearized metric perturbation $h_{\mu\nu}$ coupled by $S_{\rm int} = -\frac{\kappa}{2}\int \xi^\beta_{\rho\sigma} h^{\rho\sigma} \varrho\, d\mu$, then the variance of the smeared induced observable $\tilde h(f)$ in the combined state is the sum of the intrinsic variance and the induced variance, with the latter given by Eq.\,(5.23): ${\rm var}(h_{\rm ind}(f);\omega_\beta) = \frac{\kappa^2}{4}\int K^\beta_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}(x,y) f^{\mu\nu}(x) f^{\alpha\beta}(y)\, d\mu_x d\mu_y$, where $K^\beta$ is the causal noise kernel built from the advanced-minus-retarded propagator and the thermal noise kernel. The proof uses the scattering morphism of the measurement scheme, which acts as $\Theta = {\rm id} + G\cdot\xi$, so smearing the two-point function of the noise with the metric propagator produces exactly the variance of the induced perturbation.

Load-bearing premise

The result relies on dropping the higher-derivative curvature tensors from the linearized Einstein–Langevin equation to obtain a hyperbolic propagator, so if those terms are not negligible the propagator and hence the variance formula change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the theorem holds, the thermal noise kernel is not a phenomenological construct: it is the two-point function of the metric fluctuations an observer would actually measure, so stochastic-gravity predictions can be tested with covariant measurement protocols.
  • The explicit large-temperature and small-momentum limits provide ready-to-use local approximations of the noise kernel, which can be inserted into cosmological perturbation equations for the radiation era to compute induced tensor-mode spectra.
  • The variance formula implies a minimum uncertainty in any probe of linearized metric perturbations sourced by thermal photons, so future low-energy searches for quantum gravity effects in flat space or cosmology inherit a companion noise floor.
  • Because only the symmetric part of the kernel enters the variance, the classical stochastic description of the noise is equivalent, for this observable, to the full quantum algebraic one; the result is robust to how the noise algebra is quantized.
  • The same construction applies directly to Minkowski spacetime in the limit $a(\eta)\to 1$, giving a concrete flat-space formula for the thermal variance of metric fluctuations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct check would be to compute the variance using the full fourth-order Einstein–Langevin propagator without order reduction for a simple probe; if runaway solutions contribute at late times, the identity (5.23) may pick up extra terms, so the order-reduction step delimits the regime of validity.
  • The equality suggests a general operational definition of a metric-perturbation spectrum in curved spacetime: one could define the measured variance for any Hadamard state and any background by smearing the corresponding noise kernel with the causal metric propagator, extending the result beyond thermal states and Maxwell fields.
  • The large-temperature local noise kernel implies an effective tachyonic mass for tensor perturbations in the radiation era; comparing the measurement-variance form of this kernel with the power-spectrum form used in earlier work would test whether the two routes to induced perturbations agree.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes thermal fluctuations of a free, conformally invariant Maxwell field in FLRW spacetimes within the frameworks of semiclassical gravity, stochastic gravity, and the Fewster-Verch measurement scheme. It evaluates the renormalized stress-energy tensor in a conformally thermal Hadamard state, solves the background semiclassical Einstein equation at high temperature (recovering a radiation-dominated universe), computes the thermal noise kernel in the large-temperature, small-temperature, and small-momentum limits, and proves that the variance of the induced linearized metric perturbation equals the noise kernel smeared with causal propagators of the order-reduced linearized Einstein-Langevin equation. The paper concludes that thermal quantum fluctuations impose a minimum measurement uncertainty on the metric.

Significance. The paper provides technically detailed and explicit analytic computations of the thermal noise kernel for photons in a cosmological background, which is a valuable contribution to stochastic gravity and early-universe cosmology. The connection to the Fewster-Verch measurement framework gives an operational interpretation of the noise kernel variance, although that result is largely a formal identity once the noise-sourced perturbation is defined. The main caveat is the order reduction of the Einstein-Langevin equation, which the authors explicitly acknowledge in Section 6; the variance theorem is clean and rigorous within the order-reduced effective theory. If this scope limitation is clearly stated in the abstract and introduction, the paper is a solid and useful contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.2 (Eqs. (5.9), (5.23))] Theorem 5.1 and Eq. (5.23) are proven for the order-reduced operator P in Eq. (5.11), obtained by dropping the fourth-order curvature tensors A(1) and B(1) from Eq. (2.11b). The full Einstein-Langevin equation is not Green-hyperbolic, and the authors note in Section 6 that runaway solutions may appear and that a more careful analysis is deferred to future work. Therefore, the claimed exact correspondence between the thermal noise kernel and the variance of the induced metric fluctuations holds only for the order-reduced effective theory, not for the original Einstein-Langevin dynamics. The abstract and introduction should be rephrased to make this qualification explicit, and Theorem 5.1 should clearly identify the propagator as the one of the reduced equation. This is a load-bearing point because the central claim of the paper is the 'exact' correspondence.
  2. [§4, Proposition 4.1 and Remark 3.1] The noise kernel Kβ in Eq. (4.5) is computed from the stress-energy tensor operator corresponding to the classical expression (3.7). Remark 3.1 explains that gauge-fixing and ghost contributions cancel for the expectation value ω(Tμν), but the noise kernel involves the connected two-point function of two stress tensors. The paper does not justify that the same cancellation holds for this two-point function, even though the variance formula in Theorem 5.1 uses this noise kernel as its only state-dependent input. A brief argument or a reference establishing the gauge-independence of the noise kernel for the Maxwell field should be added, or the computation should be explicitly restricted to a gauge-invariant sector where the classical expression is valid.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.1 and §3.2] There are several typos, e.g., 'cooordinates' and 'wtih' in §2.1, and 'it is has been proved' in §3.2; the manuscript needs a careful proofreading pass.
  2. [§5.2, Eq. (5.25)] In the proof of Theorem 5.1, the expansion after the second equality of Eq. (5.25) appears garbled: the expectation of the squared sum should be expanded as the sum of the squared terms plus the cross term, and the last displayed expression should be the square of the expectation value of the sum, not the sum of squared expectation values. The final result is correct, but the intermediate formula should be fixed.
  3. [Appendix A.1, Lemma A.1] The displayed equation in the proof of Lemma A.1 (following Eq. (A.13)) contains a garbled expression; the recursion relation and its proof should be restated cleanly.
  4. [References] Reference [23] lists the author as 'B.B. Hu' instead of 'B.L. Hu'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the thermal noise kernel is an independent QFT computation, and Theorem 5.1 is a formal consistency identity of stochastic gravity, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is: Section 4 computes the thermal noise kernel K_beta from the point-split Maxwell two-point function in a conformally thermal state; this is an independent field-theoretic calculation with no fitted parameters. Theorem 5.1 (Eq. 5.23) then evaluates var(h_ind(f); omega_beta) = (kappa^2/4) times the integral of K_beta smeared with the causal propagator G of the order-reduced hyperbolic operator P in Eq. (5.11). This result is a formal consequence of defining h_ind as the retarded/advanced solution sourced by the stochastic noise xi (Eq. 5.20) and fixing the two-point function of xi to be the noise kernel N (Eq. 5.10b). In other words, the variance of a linear functional of a Gaussian field is, by construction, the covariance smeared with the response function. That is a consistency identity of stochastic gravity, not a circular derivation of the noise kernel from the metric variance: the physically substantive content of the paper is the explicit evaluation of K_beta in Section 4 and Appendix A, which is independent of the theorem. The Fewster-Verch measurement framework [48] and the Hadamard-state results are used as external, cited mathematical scaffolding, and the authors' own prior work [38] is used only for context and for one-loop intrinsic perturbations, not as the load-bearing premise of the variance theorem. The order-reduction step dropping A^(1) and B^(1) to obtain the Green-hyperbolic equation (5.11), with the admitted possible runaway solutions in Section 6, is a correctness or approximation caveat rather than circularity: it changes the propagator and hence the formula, but it does not make Eq. (5.23) assume its own conclusion. No concrete circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations or citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contains no fitted constants; the inverse temperature β is a physical parameter of the thermal state, and the renormalization constants are scheme choices. The main burden is the set of frameworks assumed: Hadamard renormalization, conformally thermal states, order reduction, linearized gravity quantization, and the Fewster-Verch measurement scheme. None of these are new entities introduced by this paper. The load-bearing assumption is order reduction, which the authors themselves flag as an open issue.

free parameters (1)
  • αB (renormalization constant) = chosen by hand to cancel the ∇²R term in the trace anomaly (Remark 3.2)
    The paper sets αB in Eq. (2.10) so that the ∇²R contribution in Eq. (3.12) is discarded; this is a renormalization scheme choice rather than a fit to data, and it does not affect the noise kernel or the measurement variance theorem.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Hadamard states and the Hollands-Wald renormalization freedom classification
    Used in Section 3.2 to define the renormalized stress-energy tensor and the trace anomaly (Eqs. (3.8)-(3.12)). This is standard AQFT background.
  • domain assumption Conformally thermal states (3.1), (3.2) exist, are Hadamard, and satisfy the KMS condition
    Invoked in Section 3.1 and justified by bulk-to-boundary constructions cited from [41-44]. The entire paper's noise kernel depends on this state choice.
  • ad hoc to paper Order reduction of the semiclassical Einstein-Langevin equation
    The higher-derivative curvature tensors A(1), B(1) and the ∇²R term are discarded in Eq. (2.11b) and Eq. (5.9). The authors describe this in Section 6 as a removal of potential runaway solutions and call for a more careful analysis in the future. This is a load-bearing approximation for the variance theorem.
  • domain assumption Fewster-Verch local covariant measurement framework
    The framework of [48] is assumed as the definition of a measurement, including the response maps and scattering morphism used in Section 5.1.
  • domain assumption The linearized metric perturbation is quantized as a free field on the fixed background in de Donder gauge
    Section 5.2 imports the quantization of linearized gravity from [89], assuming the propagator G of Eq. (5.11) is the appropriate causal propagator and that gauge-invariant observables are obtained by smearing with conserved test tensors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Measurements in stochastic gravity and thermal variance." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D4T7664M

@misc{pith2026250623193,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Measurements in stochastic gravity and thermal variance},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D4T7664M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23193}
}
read the original abstract

We analyze the thermal fluctuations of a free, conformally invariant, Maxwell quantum field (photon) interacting with a cosmological background spacetime, in the framework of quantum field theory in curved spacetimes and semiclassical and stochastic gravity. The thermal fluctuations give rise to backreaction effects upon the spacetime geometry, which are incorporated in the semiclassical Einstein-Langevin equation, evaluated in the cosmological Friedmann-Lema\^{i}tre-Robertson-Walker spacetime. We first evaluate the semiclassical Einstein equation for the background geometry sourced by the thermal quantum stress-energy tensor. For large enough temperature, the solution is approximated by a radiation-dominated expanding universe driven by the thermal bath of photons. We then evaluate the thermal noise kernel associated to the quantum fluctuations of the photon field using point-splitting regularization methods, and give its explicit analytic form in the limits of large and small temperature, as well as a local approximation. Finally, we prove that this thermal noise kernel corresponds exactly to the thermal variance of the induced fluctuations of the linearized metric perturbation in the local and covariant measurement scheme defined by Fewster and Verch. Our analysis allows to quantify the extent to which quantum fluctuations may give rise to non-classical effects, and thus become relevant in inflationary cosmology.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the importance of radiation-era initial conditions for tensor perturbations

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tensor perturbations remain conserved on super-horizon scales when radiation initial conditions during reheating are locally perturbed by existing modes, unlike global equilibrium assumptions that suppress amplitudes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Starobinsky,Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary universe scenario and generation of perturbations, Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary universe scenario and generation of perturbations, Phys. Lett. B117 (1982) 175

    1982

  2. [2]

    Liddle and D.H

    A.R. Liddle and D.H. Lyth,Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2000), 10.1017/CBO9781139175180

    doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175180 2000

  3. [3]

    Wald,The back reaction effect in particle creation in curved spacetime, Commun

    R.M. Wald,The back reaction effect in particle creation in curved spacetime, Commun. Math. Phys. 54 (1977) 1

    1977

  4. [4]

    Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics, Chicago Lectures in Physics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA (1995)

    R.M. Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics, Chicago Lectures in Physics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA (1995)

    1995

  5. [5]

    On the Back Reaction Problem for Gravitational Perturbations

    V.F. Mukhanov, L.R.W. Abramo and R.H. Brandenberger,Backreaction Problem for Cosmological Perturbations, Phys. Rev. Lett.78 (1997) 1624 [gr-qc/9609026]. – 38 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  6. [6]

    Hu and L

    B.L. Hu and L. Parker,Effect of gravitation creation in isotropically expanding universes, Phys. Lett. A63 (1977) 217

    1977

  7. [7]

    Hartle and B.L

    J.B. Hartle and B.L. Hu,Quantum effects in the early universe. II. Effective action for scalar fields in homogeneous cosmologies with small anisotropy, Phys. Rev. D20 (1979) 1772

    1979

  8. [8]

    Hack,Cosmological Applications of Algebraic Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetimes, vol

    T.P. Hack,Cosmological Applications of Algebraic Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetimes, vol. 6 ofSpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics, Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2016), 10.1007/978-3-319-21894-6

    doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21894-6 2016

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    Pinamonti,On the Initial Conditions and Solutions of the Semiclassical Einstein Equations in a Cosmological Scenario, Commun

    N. Pinamonti,On the Initial Conditions and Solutions of the Semiclassical Einstein Equations in a Cosmological Scenario, Commun. Math. Phys.305 (2011) 563

    2011

  2. [10]

    Pinamonti and D

    N. Pinamonti and D. Siemssen,Global Existence of Solutions of the Semiclassical Einstein Equation for Cosmological Spacetimes, Commun. Math. Phys.334 (2015) 171 [1309.6303]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Gottschalk and D

    H. Gottschalk and D. Siemssen,The Cosmological Semiclassical Einstein Equation as an Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical System, Ann. H. Poincaré22 (2021) 3915 [1809.03812]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    P. Meda, N. Pinamonti and D. Siemssen,Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions of the Semiclassical Einstein Equation in Cosmological Models, Ann. H. Poincaré22 (2021) 3965 [2007.14665]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Gottschalk, N.R

    H. Gottschalk, N.R. Rothe and D. Siemssen,Cosmological de Sitter Solutions of the Semiclassical Einstein Equation, Ann. H. Poincaré24 (2023) 2949 [2206.07774]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Hu and A

    B.L. Hu and A. Matacz,Back reaction in semiclassical gravity: The Einstein-Langevin equation, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 1577 [gr-qc/9403043]

    1995 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Campos and E

    A. Campos and E. Verdaguer,Semiclassical equations for weakly inhomogeneous cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 1861 [gr-qc/9307027]

    1994 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Campos and E

    A. Campos and E. Verdaguer,Stochastic semiclassical equations for weakly inhomogeneous cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) 1927 [gr-qc/9511078]

    1996 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Calzetta, A

    E. Calzetta, A. Campos and E. Verdaguer,Stochastic semiclassical cosmological models, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 2163 [gr-qc/9704010]

    1997 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Martin and E

    R. Martin and E. Verdaguer,On the semiclassical Einstein-Langevin equation, Phys. Lett. B 465 (1999) 113 [gr-qc/9811070]

    1999 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Martin and E

    R. Martin and E. Verdaguer,An Effective Stochastic Semiclassical Theory for the Gravitational Field, Int. J. Theor. Phys.38 (1999) 3049 [gr-qc/9812063]

    1999 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Martin and E

    R. Martin and E. Verdaguer,Stochastic semiclassical gravity, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 084008 [gr-qc/9904021]

    1999 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Hu and E

    B.L. Hu and E. Verdaguer,Stochastic Gravity: A Primer with Applications, Class. Quant. Grav.20 (2003) R1 [gr-qc/0211090]

    2003 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Hu and E

    B.L. Hu and E. Verdaguer,Stochastic Gravity: Theory and Applications, Living Rev. Rel.11 (2008) 3 [0802.0658]

    2008 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Hu and E

    B.B. Hu and E. Verdaguer,Semiclassical and Stochastic Gravity: Quantum Field Effects on Curved Spacetime, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2020), 10.1017/9780511667497

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Eftekharzadeh, J.D

    A. Eftekharzadeh, J.D. Bates, A. Roura, P.R. Anderson and B.L. Hu,Noise kernel for a quantum field in Schwarzschild spacetime under the Gaussian approximation, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 044037 [1011.4903]. – 39 –

    2012 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Satin,Noise kernel for the Reissner-Nordström metric: Results at the Cauchy horizon, Phys

    S. Satin,Noise kernel for the Reissner-Nordström metric: Results at the Cauchy horizon, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 084007 [1511.08926]

    2016 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Satin, H.T

    S. Satin, H.T. Cho and B.L. Hu,Conformally related Einstein-Langevin equations for metric fluctuations in stochastic gravity, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 064019 [1603.06206]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Anderson, C

    P.R. Anderson, C. Molina-París and E. Mottola,Linear response, validity of semiclassical gravity, and the stability of flat space, Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 024026

    2003

  20. [28]

    Hu and N.G

    B.L. Hu and N.G. Phillips,Fluctuations of Energy Density and Validity of Semiclassical Gravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys.39 (2000) 1817 [gr-qc/0004006]

    2000 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Hu and E

    B.L. Hu and E. Verdaguer,Recent Advances in Stochastic Gravity: Theory and Issues, in Advances in the Interplay Between Quantum and Gravity Physics, P.G. Bergmann and V. de Sabbata, eds., vol. 60 ofNATO Sci. Ser. II, pp. 133–218 (2002), DOI [gr-qc/0110092]

    2002 arXiv

  22. [30]

    B.L. Hu, A. Roura and E. Verdaguer,Stability of Semiclassical Gravity Solutions with Respect to Quantum Metric Fluctuations, Int. J. Theor. Phys.43 (2004) 749 [gr-qc/0508010]

    2004 arXiv

  23. [31]

    B.L. Hu, A. Roura and E. Verdaguer,Induced quantum metric fluctuations and the validity of semiclassical gravity, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 044002 [gr-qc/0402029]

    2004 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Calzetta and B.L

    E. Calzetta and B.L. Hu,Quantum fluctuations, decoherence of the mean field, and structure formation in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 6770 [gr-qc/9505046]

    1995 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Roura and E

    A. Roura and E. Verdaguer,Semiclassical cosmological perturbations generated during inflation, Int. J. Theor. Phys.39 (2000) 1831

    2000

  26. [34]

    Roura and E

    A. Roura and E. Verdaguer,Cosmological perturbations from stochastic gravity, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 064010 [0709.1940]

    2008 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Urakawa and K.-i

    Y. Urakawa and K.-i. Maeda,Cosmological density fluctuations in stochastic gravity: Formalism and linear analysis, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 024013 [0710.5342]

    2008 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Urakawa and K.-i

    Y. Urakawa and K.-i. Maeda,One-loop corrections to scalar and tensor perturbations during inflation in stochastic gravity, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 064004 [0801.0126]

    2008 arXiv

  29. [37]

    A. Ota, M. Sasaki and Y. Wang,One-loop thermal radiation exchange in gravitational wave power spectrum, JHEP 03 (2025) 055 [2310.19071]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    M.B. Fröb, D. Glavan, P. Meda and I. Sawicki,One-loop correction to primordial tensor modes during radiation era, 2504.02609

  31. [39]

    Ota,Cosmological stimulated emission, 2412.20474

    A. Ota,Cosmological stimulated emission, 2412.20474

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Ota and Y

    A. Ota and Y. Zhu,Graviton stimulated emission in squeezed vacuum states, 2504.06539

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Dappiaggi, V

    C. Dappiaggi, V. Moretti and N. Pinamonti,Cosmological Horizons and Reconstruction of Quantum Field Theories, Commun. Math. Phys.285 (2009) 1129 [0712.1770]

    2009 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Dappiaggi, V

    C. Dappiaggi, V. Moretti and N. Pinamonti,Distinguished quantum states in a class of cosmological spacetimes and their Hadamard property, J. Math. Phys.50 (2009) 062304 [0812.4033]

    2009 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Dappiaggi, T.-P

    C. Dappiaggi, T.-P. Hack and N. Pinamonti,Approximate KMS States for Scalar and Spinor Fields in Friedmann–Robertson–Walker Spacetimes, Ann. H. Poincaré12 (2011) 1449 [1009.5179]

    2011 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Dappiaggi, V

    C. Dappiaggi, V. Moretti and N. Pinamonti,Hadamard States from Light-like Hypersurfaces, – 40 – vol. 25 ofSpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics, Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2017), 10.1007/978-3-319-64343-4, [1706.09666]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Finster and A

    F. Finster and A. Strohmaier,Gupta–Bleuler Quantization of the Maxwell Field in Globally Hyperbolic Space-Times, Ann. H. Poincaré16 (2015) 1837 [1307.1632]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Dappiaggi and D

    C. Dappiaggi and D. Siemssen,Hadamard States for the Vector Potential on Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes, Rev. Math. Phys.25 (2013) 1350002 [1106.5575]

    2013 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Murro and G

    S. Murro and G. Schmid,The quantization of Maxwell theory in the Cauchy radiation gauge: Hodge decomposition and Hadamard states, J. Lond. Math. Soc.110 (2024) e70020 [2401.08403]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Fewster and R

    C.J. Fewster and R. Verch,Quantum Fields and Local Measurements, Commun. Math. Phys. 378 (2020) 851 [1810.06512]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Fewster, I

    C.J. Fewster, I. Jubb and M.H. Ruep,Asymptotic Measurement Schemes for Every Observable of a Quantum Field Theory, Ann. H. Poincaré24 (2023) 1137 [2203.09529]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Fewster,Lectures on measurement in quantum field theory, 2504.17437

    C.J. Fewster,Lectures on measurement in quantum field theory, 2504.17437

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Phillips and B.L

    N.G. Phillips and B.L. Hu,Noise kernel in stochastic gravity and stress energy bitensor of quantum fields in curved spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 104001 [gr-qc/0010019]

    2001 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Furlani,Quantization of the electromagnetic field on static space-times, J

    E.P. Furlani,Quantization of the electromagnetic field on static space-times, J. Math. Phys.36 (1995) 1063

    1995

  45. [53]

    Moretti,Canonical quantization of photons in a Rindler wedge, J

    V. Moretti,Canonical quantization of photons in a Rindler wedge, J. Math. Phys.38 (1997) 2922 [gr-qc/9603057]

    1997 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Furlani,Quantization of massive vector fields in curved space–time, J

    E.P. Furlani,Quantization of massive vector fields in curved space–time, J. Math. Phys.40 (1999) 2611

    1999

  47. [55]

    Pfenning,Quantization of the Maxwell field in curved spacetimes of arbitrary dimension, Class

    M.J. Pfenning,Quantization of the Maxwell field in curved spacetimes of arbitrary dimension, Class. Quant. Grav.26 (2009) 135017 [0902.4887]

    2009 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Dappiaggi and B

    C. Dappiaggi and B. Lang,Quantization of Maxwell’s Equations on Curved Backgrounds and General Local Covariance, Lett. Math. Phys.101 (2012) 265 [1104.1374]

    2012 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Hack and A

    T.-P. Hack and A. Schenkel,Linear bosonic and fermionic quantum gauge theories on curved spacetimes, Gen. Rel. Grav.45 (2013) 877 [1205.3484]

    2013 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Glavan,Photon quantization in cosmological spaces, Phys

    D. Glavan,Photon quantization in cosmological spaces, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 085014 [2212.13975]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Brunetti, C

    R. Brunetti, C. Dappiaggi, K. Fredenhagen and J. Yngvason, eds.,Advances in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory, Mathematical Physics Studies, Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2015), 10.1007/978-3-319-21353-8

    2015 doi

  52. [60]

    Huguet and J

    E. Huguet and J. Renaud,Two-point function for the Maxwell field in flat Robertson-Walker spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 124018 [1310.7333]

    2013 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Glavan,Two simple photon gauges in inflation, JHEP 06 (2025) 162 [2503.12630]

    D. Glavan,Two simple photon gauges in inflation, JHEP 06 (2025) 162 [2503.12630]

    2025 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Buchholz, I

    D. Buchholz, I. Ojima and H. Roos,Thermodynamic properties of nonequilibrium states in quantum field theory, Annals Phys.297 (2002) 219 [hep-ph/0105051]

    2002 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Becattini, L

    F. Becattini, L. Bucciantini, E. Grossi and L. Tinti,Local thermodynamical equilibrium and the beta frame for a quantum relativistic fluid, Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 191 [1403.6265]. – 41 –

    2015 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Gransee, N

    M. Gransee, N. Pinamonti and R. Verch,KMS-like properties of local equilibrium states in quantum field theory, J. Geom. Phys.117 (2017) 15 [1508.05585]

    2017 arXiv

  57. [65]

    DeWitt and R.W

    B.S. DeWitt and R.W. Brehme,Radiation damping in a gravitational field, Annals Phys.9 (1960) 220

    1960

  58. [66]

    Fewster and R

    C.J. Fewster and R. Verch,The necessity of the Hadamard condition, Class. Quant. Grav.30 (2013) 235027 [1307.5242]

    2013 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Brunetti and K

    R. Brunetti and K. Fredenhagen,Microlocal Analysis and Interacting Quantum Field Theories: Renormalization on Physical Backgrounds, Commun. Math. Phys.208 (2000) 623 [math-ph/9903028]

    2000 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Hollands and R.M

    S. Hollands and R.M. Wald,Local wick polynomials and time ordered products of quantum fields in curved spacetime, Commun. Math. Phys.223 (2001) 289

    2001

  61. [69]

    Hollands and R.M

    S. Hollands and R.M. Wald,Existence of local covariant time ordered products of quantum fields in curved spacetime, Commun. Math. Phys.231 (2002) 309

    2002

  62. [70]

    Brunetti, K

    R. Brunetti, K. Fredenhagen and M. Köhler,The microlocal spectrum condition and Wick polynomials of free fields on curved spacetimes, Commun. Math. Phys.180 (1996) 633 [gr-qc/9510056]

    1996 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Radzikowski,Micro-local approach to the hadamard condition in quantum field theory on curved space-time, Commun

    M.J. Radzikowski,Micro-local approach to the hadamard condition in quantum field theory on curved space-time, Commun. Math. Phys.179 (1996) 529

    1996

  64. [72]

    Brown and A.C

    M.R. Brown and A.C. Ottewill,Photon propagators and the definition and approximation of renormalized stress tensors in curved space-time, Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 1776

    1986

  65. [73]

    Belokogne and A

    A. Belokogne and A. Folacci,Stueckelberg massive electromagnetism in curved spacetime: Hadamard renormalization of the stress-energy tensor and the Casimir effect, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 044063 [1512.06326]

    2016 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Hollands and R.M

    S. Hollands and R.M. Wald,Conservation of the stress tensor in perurbative interacting quantum field theory in curved spacetimes, Rev. Math. Phys.17 (2005) 227

    2005

  67. [75]

    Wald,Trace anomaly of a conformally invariant quantum field in curved spacetime, Phys

    R.M. Wald,Trace anomaly of a conformally invariant quantum field in curved spacetime, Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 1477

    1978

  68. [76]

    Moretti,Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime, Commun

    V. Moretti,Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime, Commun. Math. Phys.232 (2003) 189

    2003

  69. [77]

    Simon,Stability of flat space, semiclassical gravity, and higher derivatives, Phys

    J.Z. Simon,Stability of flat space, semiclassical gravity, and higher derivatives, Phys. Rev. D. 43 (1991) 3308

    1991

  70. [78]

    Parker and J.Z

    L. Parker and J.Z. Simon,Einstein equation with quantum corrections reduced to second order, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 1339 [gr-qc/9211002]

    1993 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Fröb, D.B

    M.B. Fröb, D.B. Papadopoulos, A. Roura and E. Verdaguer,Nonperturbative semiclassical stability of de Sitter spacetime for small metric deviations, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 064019 [1301.5261]

    2013 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Glavan,Perturbative reduction of derivative order in EFT, JHEP 02 (2018) 136 [1710.01562]

    D. Glavan,Perturbative reduction of derivative order in EFT, JHEP 02 (2018) 136 [1710.01562]

    2018 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Glavan, S

    D. Glavan, S. Mukohyama and T. Zlosnik,Removing spurious degrees of freedom from EFT of gravity, JCAP 01 (2025) 111 [2409.15989]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Cho and B.L

    H.T. Cho and B.L. Hu,Noise kernels of stochastic gravity in conformally-flat spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav.32 (2015) 055006 [1407.3907]. – 42 –

    2015 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Brunetti, K

    R. Brunetti, K. Fredenhagen and K. Rejzner,Quantum Gravity from the Point of View of Locally Covariant Quantum Field Theory, Commun. Math. Phys.345 (2016) 741 [1306.1058]

    2016 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Rejzner,Perturbative Algebraic Quantum Field Theory: An Introduction for Mathematicians, Mathematical Physics Studies, Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2016), 10.1007/978-3-319-25901-7

    K. Rejzner,Perturbative Algebraic Quantum Field Theory: An Introduction for Mathematicians, Mathematical Physics Studies, Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2016), 10.1007/978-3-319-25901-7

    2016 doi

  77. [85]

    Fröb and W.C.C

    M.B. Fröb and W.C.C. Lima,Propagators for gauge-invariant observables in cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 095010 [1711.08470]

    2018 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Fröb,Gauge-invariant quantum gravitational corrections to correlation functions, Class

    M.B. Fröb,Gauge-invariant quantum gravitational corrections to correlation functions, Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 055006 [1710.00839]

    2018 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Fröb and W.C.C

    M.B. Fröb and W.C.C. Lima,Synchronous coordinates and gauge-invariant observables in cosmological spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav.40 (2023) 215006 [2303.16218]

    2023 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Ashtekar and A

    A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon-Ashtekar,On the symplectic structure of general relativity, Commun. Math. Phys.86 (1982) 55

    1982

  81. [89]

    Fewster and D.S

    C.J. Fewster and D.S. Hunt,Quantization of linearized gravity in cosmological vacuum spacetimes, Rev. Math. Phys.25 (2013) 1330003 [1203.0261]

    2013 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Benini, C

    M. Benini, C. Dappiaggi and S. Murro,Radiative observables for linearized gravity on asymptotically flat spacetimes and their boundary induced states, J. Math. Phys.55 (2014) 082301 [1404.4551]

    2014 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Gérard,Hadamard States for Linearized Gravity on Spacetimes with Compact Cauchy Surfaces, Commun

    C. Gérard,Hadamard States for Linearized Gravity on Spacetimes with Compact Cauchy Surfaces, Commun. Math. Phys.405 (2024) 145 [2311.11043]

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Fröb, T.-P

    M.B. Fröb, T.-P. Hack and A. Higuchi,Compactly supported linearised observables in single-field inflation, JCAP 07 (2017) 043 [1703.01158]

    2017 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Fröb, T.-P

    M.B. Fröb, T.-P. Hack and I. Khavkine,Approaches to linear local gauge-invariant observables in inflationary cosmologies, Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 115002 [1801.02632]

    2018 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Hintz,The linearized Einstein equations with sources, Lett

    P. Hintz,The linearized Einstein equations with sources, Lett. Math. Phys.114 (2024) 94 [2306.07715]

    2024 arXiv

  87. [95]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

    “NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions.”https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.4 of 2025-03-15. – 43 –

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.