Satellite telescope of electrons and protons STEP-F of the space scientific project "CORONAS-Photon"

O. V. Dudnik

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 17 references

Satellite telescope of electrons and protons STEP-F of the space scientific project "CORONAS-Photon"

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read During the 2009 solar minimum, the STEP-F satellite telescope detected an additional inner electron radiation belt at lower latitudes than the inner Van Allen belt and a transient splitting of the outer belt during a storm recovery.

desk verdict A well-documented instrument retrospective whose headline radiation-belt claim rests on a mixed electron/proton channel that the paper itself admits cannot be species-identified. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23212 v1 pith:XLEDREB5 submitted 2025-06-29 physics.space-ph astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR

O. V. Dudnik This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.space-phastro-ph.EPastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR

keywords Earth'smagnetospheresatelliteinstrumentscintillationdetectorsiliconmatrixchargedparticlesradiationbeltsolaractivityBrazilianmagneticanomaly

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In the deep solar minimum of 2009, a low-Earth-orbit telescope recorded persistent subrelativistic electrons where the standard radiation-belt picture says there should be none. The paper reports that the instrument detected an additional inner electron radiation belt whose ground projection lies at latitudes below those of the inner Van Allen belt at the 550 km orbit, in both hemispheres and at longitudes outside the South Atlantic Anomaly. It also reports a transient splitting of the outer belt into two nearby drift shells during the recovery phase of a magnetic substorm, and uses the quiet solar-minimum conditions to extract electron lifetimes of about 4.1 days in the outer belt and about 1.5 days in the inner belt. If these observations are correct, radiation-belt models must include quiet-time low-latitude electron populations and multi-shell structure.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the STEP-F telescope itself: a stack composed of two position-sensitive silicon matrix detectors as the thin $\Delta E$ element and four CsI(Tl) scintillators coupled to silicon photodiodes as the thick $E$ element, read out by 69 amplifier channels with a geometric factor of about $21.7\ \mathrm{cm^2\,sr}$. Particle species and energy are assigned by the classic $\Delta E$-$E$ method whenever a particle crosses at least two detector layers, while particles that stop in the first silicon layer are recorded as mixed electron–proton or proton–$\alpha$ components. Monte Carlo simulation and accelerator calibrations define the energy intervals, and the belt identification uses the magnetic-shell parameter $B/B_0$ to show that the additional belt peaks at different shell values than the inner Van Allen belt.

What would settle it

A reanalysis of the STEP-F event data that requires a valid two-layer coincidence before counting a particle, and then checks whether the low-latitude peak survives in the pure 0.35–0.95 MeV electron channel while disappearing when proton counts are subtracted from the mixed channel, would settle whether the extra belt is real.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that during the anomalously quiet solar minimum of 2009, the STEP-F satellite telescope observed a third, additional inner electron radiation belt of the Earth, with its projection located at latitudes smaller than those of the inner Van Allen belt projection at the same 550 km altitude. The belt was seen in both hemispheres, at longitudes that do not coincide with the South Atlantic Anomaly, in both the mixed channel of 0.18–0.51 MeV electrons plus 3.5–3.7 MeV protons and the 0.35–0.95 MeV electron channel, and its flux maxima occurred on different magnetic shells from the classic inner belt, as shown by different $B/B_0$ ratios. The paper further claims that during recovery of the 6–8 May 2009 substorm the outer belt split into two adjacent maxima for a short time, and that electron lifetimes estimated from isolated storm responses are $4.1 \pm 1.1$ days in the outer belt and $1.5 \pm 0.8$ days in the inner belt, so the inner belt returns to its stationary state about three times faster.

Load-bearing premise

The extra-belt claim depends on the assumption that the 0.18–0.51 MeV channel is dominated by electrons rather than by protons or background, since low-energy particles that stop in the first silicon layer cannot have their species identified and no subtraction of that component is described.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The slot region between the inner and outer belts is not empty at 550 km during solar minimum; a persistent low-latitude electron population must be supplied or stored there.
The inner belt can contain more than one radial maximum, so quiet-time models that treat it as a single belt are incomplete.
The outer belt can split into two nearby drift shells during storm recovery, so radial electron profiles are not always a simple two-belt structure.
Electron lifetimes at 0.18–0.51 MeV in the inner belt are about three times shorter than in the outer belt, which constrains the loss and recharging rates of the two belts.
During active storm phases low-energy electrons precipitate at all latitudes, including equatorial ones, coupling radiation-belt losses to the upper atmosphere far outside the South Atlantic Anomaly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the extra belt is real, a dedicated species-unambiguous instrument on the same orbit during the next solar minimum should reproduce the low-latitude 0.18–0.51 MeV electron peak below the inner belt; its absence there would point to proton contamination in the STEP-F channel.
A natural mechanism to test is slow radial transport by weak ULF waves balanced by pitch-angle-scattering losses; the reported inner-belt lifetime of about 1.5 days gives a quantitative target for such calculations.
The low-latitude electrons may be the quiet-time counterpart of storm-injected new belts reported at higher energies, suggesting a storage process that operates even without strong storms.
If low-energy electrons precipitate near the equator during storms, the same population could produce ionospheric effects at low latitudes, a connection the paper does not develop.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The main value here is the instrument paper: detailed design, calibration at accelerators, test flow, and flight operations for STEP-F, all presented with believable specificity. If you need to know what this detector could and could not do, this is a useful reference. But the scientific headline — an additional inner electron belt at lower latitudes than the classic inner belt — is not new; it was already in the author's refs 7–17, and the arXiv posting is a 2017 retrospective. That alone would be fine if the analysis were self-contained, but it is not.

The load-bearing issue is the channel definition. The additional belt in Figs. 11 and 12 is most clearly seen in the mixed channel "electrons 0.18–0.51 MeV + protons 3.5–3.7 MeV" and in the 0.35–0.95 MeV electron channel. The paper states that low-energy particles that stop in the first silicon matrix detector cannot be species-identified. At LEO altitude, inner-belt protons around the South Atlantic Anomaly and albedo protons are abundant, and no proton rejection ratio, background subtraction, or upper-limit contamination estimate is given. A few percent proton leakage into that low-energy electron gate would produce exactly the low-latitude enhancement claimed as a new belt. This is not a minor omission; it is a concrete alternative explanation that is not discussed quantitatively.

The lower-energy electron channel at 0.35–0.95 MeV is cleaner, but the paper does not separate it from the mixed-channel data in the belt plot, so the reader cannot tell which claim stands and which does not. The lifetime estimates are exponential fits to two storms with large error bars, and the claim of an energy-dependent lifetime is plausible but not compelling from two points. No comparison with independent data (Van Allen Probes, POES, other LEO missions) is provided, and the text only says such work is ongoing.

The instrument narrative deserves credit: the GEANT4 simulation, accelerator calibrations, and ground tests are real, and the author is honest about the species-identification limitation. The failure is not carelessness in building the instrument; it is a missing contamination analysis before asserting a new radiation-belt feature.

For whom is this paper? An instrument developer or someone interpreting STEP-F data will find value. A magnetospheric physicist looking for a secure new result will be disappointed. It deserves peer review as an instrument paper, but only if the scientific claims are substantially revised — either by adding a contamination analysis that supports the belt, or by clearly downgrading the belt claim to a tentative observation that motivates future work.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper describes the STEP-F satellite telescope of electrons and protons onboard the low-Earth-orbit spacecraft CORONAS-Photon during 2009. It details the instrument's development, construction, ground testing, calibration, and flight operation, and then presents scientific results from the 2009 solar minimum: detection of subrelativistic electrons at low latitudes, an additional inner electron radiation belt at lower latitudes than the classical inner Van Allen belt, anisotropic electron fluxes in the South Atlantic Anomaly, empirical electron lifetimes in the radiation belts, and a transient splitting of the outer radiation belt during storm recovery. The instrument-description portion is detailed and plausible, but the scientific results are supported mainly by summary time-series plots without quantitative background subtraction, error analysis, or independent validation.

Significance. If the additional inner electron belt claim is correct, it would be a significant observation of a persistent low-latitude electron population inside the slot region during the deep 2009 solar minimum, and the outer-belt splitting would also be a notable transient phenomenon. The paper's detailed account of the detector design, accelerator calibrations, and Monte Carlo simulations is a useful instrument reference. However, the scientific claims are not adequately supported by the presented evidence: the central belt identification depends on mixed electron-plus-proton channels with no quantified contamination analysis, and the lifetime values are fits to only two storms. The paper's significance is therefore conditional on whether the underlying data can be reanalyzed to address these gaps.

major comments (3)

[Detection of an additional internal radiation belt (Figs. 11, 12)] The additional inner belt is identified using the channel labeled as electrons 0.18–0.51 MeV plus protons 3.5–3.7 MeV, together with the 0.35–0.95 MeV electron channel. The paper's own section on particle types states that low-energy particles stopping in the first silicon layer cannot be species-identified and are recorded as a mixed component. At 550 km altitude, inner-belt protons above ~3.5 MeV and albedo protons can reach the detector, and the table gives no proton rejection ratio, no background subtraction, and no upper limit on contamination. A small proton or secondary background component in the mixed channel would produce exactly the observed low-latitude enhancement without requiring a new electron belt. The same concern applies to the 0.35–0.95 MeV channel, for which the paper provides no purity or background analysis. The belt identification is therefore not established.
[Determination of empirical electron lifetimes (Fig. 13)] The quoted lifetimes tau_1 = 4.1 ± 1.1 days and tau_2 = 1.5 ± 0.8 days are derived from only two geomagnetic disturbances. The paper does not specify the fitting function, the number of data points, the error propagation, or how mixed-channel contamination affects the decay curves. Consequently, the claim that the inner belt recovers three times faster than the outer belt is not quantitatively supported by the information given.
[Splitting of the outer radiation belt (Fig. 14)] The splitting of the outer belt on 6–8 May 2009 is presented as a new phenomenon, but the evidence is a single time-series plot without statistical significance testing, spatial-resolution evaluation, or contamination analysis. The text itself states that the explanation is still debated, but the observation itself also needs quantitative support, such as peak separation relative to noise and a demonstration that the feature is not an artifact of counting statistics or background.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract] The English abstract contains grammatical errors, for example 'provided scientific experiment in the space on the board' and 'in time of deep minimum'; it should be carefully proofread.
[Publication history and novelty] The section on publication of results states that 56 articles and abstracts have already been published on the instrument and its data; the manuscript should clearly indicate what new analysis or presentation it adds beyond references [7]–[17].
[Table of energy ranges] The notation ΔE_e and ΔE_p is not defined; a sentence explaining that ΔE denotes the energy deposit in the thin silicon detector used in the ΔE–E method would improve clarity.
[Terminology] The paper uses both 'Brazilian magnetic anomaly' and 'South-Atlantic magnetic anomaly'; the standard international term 'South Atlantic Anomaly' (SAA) should be used consistently.
[Figure 13 caption] The caption says 'Empirical lifetimes of electrons in radiation belts depending on their energy,' but the text reports only two lifetime values; clarify what is plotted (e.g., fits for two storms or points for multiple energy channels).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an observational instrument report whose scientific claims are data interpretations, not derivations that reduce to their own inputs.

full rationale

The paper contains no derivation chain in which a predicted quantity is defined in terms of the fitted result, and no load-bearing argument rests on a self-citation. The central claims — the internal belt, the outer-belt splitting, and the electron lifetimes — are presented as direct readings of STEP-F count-rate data, with supporting comparisons to GOES, SOHO, ACE, STEREO, WIND, and ground magnetometer data. The lifetime values are explicitly described as empirical determinations from observed responses to two geomagnetic disturbances, not as predictions from a fitted parameter, so they are not circular. The paper's references [1–17] are largely the author's own prior instrument descriptions and conference reports, but the flight results are drawn from the STEP-F dataset described in the text and figures rather than imported from those citations; citing one's own calibration and development work is standard and does not constitute circularity. The important limitation the paper itself states — that particles stopping in the first silicon detector cannot be species-identified and are recorded as a mixed electron/proton component — is a genuine instrumental ambiguity affecting the interpretation of the 0.18–0.51 MeV + 3.5–3.7 MeV channel. That is a correctness and calibration risk, not a circularity: the channel boundaries and the belt identification are not defined in terms of each other, and the paper does not claim to derive the belt from an assumed result. Thus no circular step satisfying the required reduction test is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central scientific claims rest on instrument calibration, the delta-E/E particle identification scheme, and an unspecified geomagnetic field model used to assign L-shells and B/B0 ratios. No new physical entities are introduced. The only numbers fitted to data are the two electron lifetimes, derived from exponential decay fits to flux responses after two geomagnetic disturbances. The paper also assumes that mixed electron/proton channels, used for the additional belt claim, are dominated by electrons.

free parameters (2)

outer belt electron lifetime tau_1 = 4.1 +/- 1.1 days
Exponential decay fit to the flux response after two geomagnetic disturbances, shown in Fig. 13.
inner belt electron lifetime tau_2 = 1.5 +/- 0.8 days
Exponential decay fit to the flux response after two geomagnetic disturbances, shown in Fig. 13.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The delta-E/E telescope identification is unambiguous for particles that pass at least two detector layers.
Invoked in the section on types and energies of particles; the paper states that low-range particles are assigned to mixed channels, so species separation is only partial.
domain assumption Drift-shell coordinates L and B/B0 ratios from an unspecified geomagnetic field model are valid for assigning observations to radiation belts.
Used in the section on the additional belt and in Fig. 12; the field model is not identified.
ad hoc to paper Flux enhancements after geomagnetic storms decay exponentially with a single lifetime.
Used in the section on empirical electron lifetimes to derive tau_1 and tau_2 from two storm events.
domain assumption External data from SOHO, ACE, STEREO, GOES, and WIND are reliable and suitable for context.
Invoked in the scientific results section for comparisons of storm responses and interplanetary conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Satellite telescope of electrons and protons STEP-F of the space scientific project "CORONAS-Photon"." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XLEDREB5

@misc{pith2026250623212,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Satellite telescope of electrons and protons STEP-F of the space scientific project "CORONAS-Photon"},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XLEDREB5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23212}
}

abstract

The Ukrainian satellite telescope of electrons and protons STEP-F conducted a scientific experiment in space on board the low Earth orbit spacecraft "CORONAS-Photon" in 2009. In the article it is described the background, stages of development, manufacturing and tests of weight-dimensional, breadboard, technological, flight and auxiliary models of the instrument, and of the control and test suites for the STEP-F. The principles of operation, design, and technical and scientific characteristics of the instrument have been described. Stages of adjustment, graduating and autonomous, docking, complex, ground pre-flight and flight tests have been shown. Scientific results obtained by the STEP-F instrument during the time of deep minimum of solar activity demonstrate the detection of new features in high-energy charged particle distributions inside radiation belts of the Earth, in the region of the Brazilian magnetic anomaly, and outside of the referred volumes. Keywords: Earth$'$s magnetosphere, satellite instrument, scintillation detector, silicon matrix, charged particles, radiation belt, solar activity, Brazilian magnetic anomaly.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

[1]

The International project PHOTON for the complex study of solar activity and Sun-Earth connections

Zalyubovsky I.I., Dudnik A.V ., Kotov Yu.D., Yurov V .N. The International project PHOTON for the complex study of solar activity and Sun-Earth connections. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics. 1997. 61(6): 1173. [Залюбовский И.И., Дудник А.В., Котов Ю.Д., Юров В.Н. Международный проект «Фотон» для комплексного изучения солнечной активнос...

work page 1997
[2]

CORONAS-PHOTON

Dudnik O.V ., Zalyubovsky I.I. Scientific tasks of international space experiment “CORONAS-PHOTON”. Kosm. Nauka T ehnol. 2000. 6(2): 3. [Дудник А.В., Залюбовский И.И. Научные задачи международного космического эксперимента КОРОНАС- ФОТОН. Космічна наука і технологія. 2000. Т. 6, № 2. С. 3—12.]

work page 2000
[3]

The computer simulation of deposited energies and stopping ranges of particles in the STEP spectrometer of the Warning space project

Dudnik O.V ., Malykhina T.V . The computer simulation of deposited energies and stopping ranges of particles in the STEP spectrometer of the Warning space project. Kosm. Nauka T ehnol. 2003. 9(1): 15. [Дудник А.В., Малыхина Т.В. Компьютерное моделирование поглощенной энергии и пробегов частиц в спек- трометре СТЭП космического проекта «Попередження». Косм...

work page 2003
[4]

Computer simulation and calibration of the charge particle spectrometer—telescope STEP-F

Dudnik O.V ., Goka T., Matsumoto H., Fujii M., Persikov V .K., Malykhina T.V . Computer simulation and calibration of the charge particle spectrometer—telescope STEP-F . Adv. Space Res. 2003. 32(11): 2367

work page 2003
[5]

Accelerator test of charge particle detectors for a satellite instrument STEP-F

Dudnik O., Goka T., Matsumoto H., Fujii M., Persikov V ., Malykhina T., Kato H. Accelerator test of charge particle detectors for a satellite instrument STEP-F . RIKEN Accelerator Progress Report (Japan). 2003. 37: 168

work page 2003
[6]

High-sensi- tivity STEP-F spectrometer—telescope for high-energy particles of the CORONAS-PHOTON satellite experiment

Dudnik O.V ., Persikov V .K., Zalyubovskiy I.I., Timakova T.G., Kurbatov E.V ., Kotov Yu.D., Yurov V .N. High-sensi- tivity STEP-F spectrometer—telescope for high-energy particles of the CORONAS-PHOTON satellite experiment. Solar System Research. 2011. 45(3): 212. [Дудник А.В., Персиков В.К., Залюбовский И.И. и др. Высокочувствительный спектрометр-телеско...

work page 2011
[7]

Investigation of the Earth’s radiation belts in May, 2009, at the low orbit satellite with the STEP-F instrument

Dudnik O.V . Investigation of the Earth’s radiation belts in May, 2009, at the low orbit satellite with the STEP-F instrument. Kosm. Nauka T ehnol. 2010. 16(5): 12. [Дудник А.В. Исследование радиационных поясов Земли в мае 2009 года на низкоорбитальном спутнике с помощью прибора СТЭП-Ф. Космічна наука і технологія. 2010. Т. 16. № 5. С. 12—28.]

work page 2009
[8]

Variations of electron fluxes in the Earth radiation belts in May, 2009 due to “STEP-F” device observa- tions

Dudnik O.V . Variations of electron fluxes in the Earth radiation belts in May, 2009 due to “STEP-F” device observa- tions. Journal of Kharkov National University. Physical series. 2010. 916(3): 56. [Дудник А.В. Вариации потоков электронов в радиационных поясах Земли в мае 2009 года по наблюдени- ям с помощью прибора «СТЭП-Ф». Вісник Харківського націонал...

work page 2009

Show all 17 references

[9]

Dudnik O.V ., Podgorski P ., Sylwester J., Gburek S., Kowalinski M., Siarkowski M., Plocieniak S., Bakala J. Investiga- tion of electron belts in the Earth’s magnetosphere with the help of X-ray spectrophotometer SphinX and satellite telescope of electrons and protons STEP-F: ...

2011
[10]

X-Ray spectrophotometer SphinX and particle spectrometer STEP-F of the satellite experiment CORONAS-PHOTON

Dudnik O.V ., Podgorski P ., Sylwester J., Gburek S., Kowalinski M., Siarkowski M., Plocieniak S., Bakala J. X-Ray spectrophotometer SphinX and particle spectrometer STEP-F of the satellite experiment CORONAS-PHOTON. preliminary results of the joint data analysis. Solar System...

2012
[11]

CORONAS-PHOTON

Dudnik O.V . Dynamics of the Earth’s radiation belt electrons in May, 2009, on the base of the STEP-F instrument observations. In: Results of space experiment “CORONAS-PHOTON”: Proc. W orkshop (May 19—21, 2010, Tarusa, Russia). (Moscow . IKI RAN, 2012). P . 103—125. [Дудник А....

2009
[12]

Joint analysis of SphinX and STEP-F instruments data on magnetospheric electron flux dynamics at low Earth orbit

Podgorski P ., Dudnik O.V ., Sylwester J., Gburek S., Kowalinski M., Siarkowski M., Plocieniak S., Bakala J. Joint analysis of SphinX and STEP-F instruments data on magnetospheric electron flux dynamics at low Earth orbit. Proc. 39 th COSP AR Scientific Assembly (July 14—22, 2...

2012
[13]

Unexpected behavior of subrelativistic electron fluxes under Earth radiation belts

Dudnik O. Unexpected behavior of subrelativistic electron fluxes under Earth radiation belts. In: HEPP A/ SOLARIS-2012: 4th Int. workshop (October 9—12, 2012, Boulder, Colorado, USA). P . 15

2012
[14]

Radiation belts of the Earth: overview, methods of investigations, recent observations on the CORONAS-Photon spacecraft

Dudnik O., Sylwester J., Podgorsi P ., Gburek S. Radiation belts of the Earth: overview, methods of investigations, recent observations on the CORONAS-Photon spacecraft. In: Progress on EUV&X-ray spectroscopy and imaging: Proc. Int. Conf. (November 20—22, 2012, Wroclaw, Poland)

2012
[15]

CORONAS—PHOTON

Dudnik O.V ., Sylwester J., Podgorski P . Properties of magnetospheric high energy particles based on analysis of data from STEP-F and SphinX instruments aboard the “CORONAS—PHOTON” satellite. In: Space Research in Ukraine, 2012—2014. The Report to the COSP AR. Fedorov O.P . (...

2012
[16]

New perspectives to study the splitting of drift shells at the outer mag- netosphere by using STEP-F and SphinX instruments on board the CORONAS-Photon satellite

Dudnik O.V ., Podgorski P ., Sylwester J. New perspectives to study the splitting of drift shells at the outer mag- netosphere by using STEP-F and SphinX instruments on board the CORONAS-Photon satellite. In: Progress on EUV&X-ray spectroscopy and imaging II: Proc. Int. Conf. ...

2015
[17]

In: Proc

Dudnik O.V ., Podgorski P ., Sylwester J.Combined study of radiation belts by the satellite particle telescope STEP-F and solar soft X-ray photometer SphinX during recent deep minimum of solar activity . In: Proc. 23 National Solar Physics Meeting (May 30 — June 3, 2016, Lipto...

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

The International project PHOTON for the complex study of solar activity and Sun-Earth connections

Zalyubovsky I.I., Dudnik A.V ., Kotov Yu.D., Yurov V .N. The International project PHOTON for the complex study of solar activity and Sun-Earth connections. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics. 1997. 61(6): 1173. [Залюбовский И.И., Дудник А.В., Котов Ю.Д., Юров В.Н. Международный проект «Фотон» для комплексного изучения солнечной активнос...

work page 1997

[2] [2]

CORONAS-PHOTON

Dudnik O.V ., Zalyubovsky I.I. Scientific tasks of international space experiment “CORONAS-PHOTON”. Kosm. Nauka T ehnol. 2000. 6(2): 3. [Дудник А.В., Залюбовский И.И. Научные задачи международного космического эксперимента КОРОНАС- ФОТОН. Космічна наука і технологія. 2000. Т. 6, № 2. С. 3—12.]

work page 2000

[3] [3]

The computer simulation of deposited energies and stopping ranges of particles in the STEP spectrometer of the Warning space project

Dudnik O.V ., Malykhina T.V . The computer simulation of deposited energies and stopping ranges of particles in the STEP spectrometer of the Warning space project. Kosm. Nauka T ehnol. 2003. 9(1): 15. [Дудник А.В., Малыхина Т.В. Компьютерное моделирование поглощенной энергии и пробегов частиц в спек- трометре СТЭП космического проекта «Попередження». Косм...

work page 2003

[4] [4]

Computer simulation and calibration of the charge particle spectrometer—telescope STEP-F

Dudnik O.V ., Goka T., Matsumoto H., Fujii M., Persikov V .K., Malykhina T.V . Computer simulation and calibration of the charge particle spectrometer—telescope STEP-F . Adv. Space Res. 2003. 32(11): 2367

work page 2003

[5] [5]

Accelerator test of charge particle detectors for a satellite instrument STEP-F

Dudnik O., Goka T., Matsumoto H., Fujii M., Persikov V ., Malykhina T., Kato H. Accelerator test of charge particle detectors for a satellite instrument STEP-F . RIKEN Accelerator Progress Report (Japan). 2003. 37: 168

work page 2003

[6] [6]

High-sensi- tivity STEP-F spectrometer—telescope for high-energy particles of the CORONAS-PHOTON satellite experiment

Dudnik O.V ., Persikov V .K., Zalyubovskiy I.I., Timakova T.G., Kurbatov E.V ., Kotov Yu.D., Yurov V .N. High-sensi- tivity STEP-F spectrometer—telescope for high-energy particles of the CORONAS-PHOTON satellite experiment. Solar System Research. 2011. 45(3): 212. [Дудник А.В., Персиков В.К., Залюбовский И.И. и др. Высокочувствительный спектрометр-телеско...

work page 2011

[7] [7]

Investigation of the Earth’s radiation belts in May, 2009, at the low orbit satellite with the STEP-F instrument

Dudnik O.V . Investigation of the Earth’s radiation belts in May, 2009, at the low orbit satellite with the STEP-F instrument. Kosm. Nauka T ehnol. 2010. 16(5): 12. [Дудник А.В. Исследование радиационных поясов Земли в мае 2009 года на низкоорбитальном спутнике с помощью прибора СТЭП-Ф. Космічна наука і технологія. 2010. Т. 16. № 5. С. 12—28.]

work page 2009

[8] [8]

Variations of electron fluxes in the Earth radiation belts in May, 2009 due to “STEP-F” device observa- tions

Dudnik O.V . Variations of electron fluxes in the Earth radiation belts in May, 2009 due to “STEP-F” device observa- tions. Journal of Kharkov National University. Physical series. 2010. 916(3): 56. [Дудник А.В. Вариации потоков электронов в радиационных поясах Земли в мае 2009 года по наблюдени- ям с помощью прибора «СТЭП-Ф». Вісник Харківського націонал...

work page 2009