Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 36 references

Dynamical evolution and stability of quantum corrected Schwarzschild black holes in semiclassical gravity

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The static quantum corrected Schwarzschild solution is an unstable wormhole that expands in vacuum and collapses to an evaporating black hole when even a small amount of classical matter is present.

desk verdict Instability result is solid and new; the evaporating-black-hole endpoint is an overreach resting on an admittedly inconsistent control run. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00109 v1 pith:RIBW6VWE submitted 2025-06-30 gr-qc hep-th

Ben Kain This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th PACS 04.70.-s04.62.+v
keywords semiclassicalgravityblackholeevaporationwormholestabilityPolyakovapproximationrenormalizedstress-energytensordoublenullcoordinatesnumericalrelativitySchwarzschild
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the quantum corrected Schwarzschild spacetime—the static, horizonless wormhole obtained when semiclassical backreaction is added to general relativity—survives time-dependent perturbations. The author evolves that static solution numerically and finds it does not survive: numerical noise alone triggers expansion of the wormhole throat, while a minuscule pulse of scalar matter triggers collapse. In the collapse case, apparent horizons form, the throat contracts until $r$ reaches $\sqrt{P}$, which is read as the central singularity, and the system heads toward an evaporating black hole. A sympathetic reading of the result is that semiclassical corrections do not produce a stable static endpoint for gravitational collapse; the astrophysically relevant endpoint would be an evaporating black hole.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the Polyakov approximation to the renormalized energy-momentum tensor, $\langle \hat T_{ab}\rangle = \frac{3P}{r^2}\langle \hat T_{ab}\rangle^{(2D)}$ with $P = N/(12\pi)\ell_P^2$, obtained from the two-dimensional trace anomaly; in double null coordinates its nonvanishing components are $\langle \hat T_{uu}\rangle = \frac{P}{4\pi r^2}(\sigma_{,uu} - \sigma_{,u}^2)$, $\langle \hat T_{vv}\rangle = \frac{P}{4\pi r^2}(\sigma_{,vv} - \sigma_{,v}^2)$, and $\langle \hat T_{uv}\rangle = -\frac{P}{4\pi r^2}\sigma_{,uv}$. This tensor removes the classical horizon in the static solution, supports black hole evaporation in the dynamical equations, and enters the $\sigma$ evolution equation through the factor $(1 - P/r^2)^{-1}$, whose divergence at $r = \sqrt{P}$ is interpreted as the central singularity. The numerical method uses the gauge freedom of double null coordinates, including the adaptive gauge method, to track horizons to large null time.

What would settle it

Evolve the same static initial data with a renormalized stress-energy tensor computed directly in 3+1 dimensions (for example, a full s-wave reduction) instead of the Polyakov formula, and compare the fate of the throat. If the static configuration persists, or if the collapsing branch settles to a static Schwarzschild black hole rather than evaporating, the paper's central claim fails. A cheaper check is to alter the multiplicative factor in the Polyakov expression while keeping conservation; the stability conclusion should not depend delicately on that factor if it is physical.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated on the paper's own terms, is that the semiclassically corrected static Schwarzschild solution is dynamically unstable. Evolved in double null coordinates, the static configuration holds only temporarily: decreasing the grid spacing makes it hold longer, which is the expected signature of an unstable static solution rather than a numerical artifact. With no classical matter, the only stress-energy is the renormalized tensor, there is a net ingoing flux, mass increases, and the wormhole throat expands. With any sufficiently small classical scalar pulse—down to a $0.001\%$ mass increase—the throat collapses, horizons form over the wormhole mouths, $r$ falls to $\sqrt{P}$, and the system evolves toward an evaporating black hole rather than settling to Schwarzschild.

Load-bearing premise

The entire result depends on the Polyakov approximation to the renormalized energy-momentum tensor—including its $3P/r^2$ factor, zero angular components, and the divergence at $r=\sqrt{P}$ being treated as the central singularity—being an adequate stand-in for the true semiclassical backreaction; if that approximation misrepresents the physics, both the initial wormhole and the collapse-to-evaporation endpoint could be artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The static horizonless wormhole is not a possible final state; a system beginning from it will either expand or collapse.
  • Vacuum evolutions show expansion, so a universe with only the renormalized vacuum stress would not keep such a wormhole static.
  • Even an extremely small amount of infalling classical matter (about $0.001\%$ mass increase) triggers collapse to a horizon and singularity.
  • The collapsed object evaporates: the apparent horizon radius decreases at large $v$ instead of approaching a constant, which is attributed to the renormalized stress-energy tensor.
  • By analogy, the quantum corrected Reissner-Nordström and Einstein-Yang-Mills static solutions are expected to be unstable as well, with the extremal Reissner-Nordström case left as an open question.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the near-threshold structure suggests a sharp separatrix at zero matter: arbitrarily small infalling matter switches the outcome from expansion to collapse, which could be mapped as a critical phenomenon in pulse amplitude and placement.
  • Undefined by the paper, this result would make the Polyakov-based wormhole observationally irrelevant as an endpoint, but it also predicts a distinguishing signature: if semiclassical collapse is real, the endpoint is evaporating rather than static, so remnant mass flux should be present.
  • As an editorial extension, a direct test of the approximation's role would be to repeat the evolution with a different conserved renormalized stress-energy prescription; if the expansion/collapse bifurcation disappears, the instability is an artifact of the Polyakov form rather than semiclassical gravity itself.
  • The interior region beyond the throat (the null singularity side) is not evolved in this paper; resolving it with the adaptive gauge method applied along columns could reveal whether evaporating black holes retain a wormhole remnant or end in a naked singularity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the nonlinear stability of the static quantum-corrected Schwarzschild solution obtained in earlier work using the Polyakov approximation for the renormalized stress-energy tensor. Taking that static solution as initial data in double-null coordinates, the author evolves it with a second-order predictor-corrector scheme. In the absence of classical matter, the wormhole throat expands under numerical discretization error; when a small scalar-field pulse is added, the throat collapses, apparent horizons form, and the areal radius of the outer apparent horizon decreases at late times. The paper interprets the late-time decrease as black-hole evaporation and concludes that the static horizonless wormhole is unstable, with an evaporating black hole as the likely physical endpoint. The appendix reports second-order convergence and constraint-satisfaction tests.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides the first nonlinear dynamical demonstration that the horizonless static solutions of semiclassical gravity are unstable and identifies a plausible dynamical endpoint. The numerical methodology is a clear strength: the code is tested for second-order convergence in both uniform and adaptive gauges (Figs. 7 and 8), and the instability conclusion is supported by the resolution dependence of the expansion onset in Fig. 2. The paper also connects its wormhole dynamics qualitatively to the Ellis-Bronnikov case, which is useful. However, the evaporation claim is not yet demonstrated at the level asserted in the abstract: the only control run used to isolate evaporation is explicitly inconsistent, and no flux-based mass-loss diagnostic is provided. This tempers the significance of the advertised endpoint, though the instability and collapse results remain credible.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV, Fig. 4] The abstract and Sec. V claim that the collapsing wormhole 'evolves to an evaporating black hole,' but the only evidence isolating evaporation as the cause of the late-time decrease of the apparent-horizon radius is the P=0 run in Fig. 4(b). The author explicitly labels this evolution inconsistent: the initial data are the static P=0.1 solution plus pulse, while the evolution equations set P=0. This run violates the constraint equations (15) and (A3) at the initial surface and therefore cannot serve as a control. The decreasing apparent-horizon radius in Fig. 4(a) can also arise from wormhole-collapse dynamics under null-energy-condition violation, as the author notes. The simulation is not carried to r approaching zero, and no mass-loss rate is compared with the Polyakov flux. To support the evaporation interpretation, the author should either temper the claim or add a consistent diagnostic, such as computing the outgoing flux through a large-v surface and showing dM/dv matches the integrated <T_uu>, or demonstrating that the late-time behavior converges in a sequence of constraint-satisfying evolutions with decreasing P.
  2. [Sec. III A and Sec. IV (Fig. 3)] The interpretation that the divergence of the evolution equation (16) at r=sqrt(P) marks a central singularity is an interpretive assumption, not a derived result. In the units used (l_P=1), sqrt(P)=0.316 for P=0.1, so the divergence occurs below the Planck length, where the semiclassical Polyakov approximation is not expected to be reliable. The simulation terminates at this divergence, so the claim that a central singularity forms is not directly evidenced. The paper should either soften this claim in the abstract and conclusion or add a test showing that the collapse outcome is insensitive to the treatment of the near-sqrt(P) region, for example by varying resolution and the stopping criterion, or by using a regularized version of the RSET.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. IV] The pulse parameters for Fig. 3 are given as A=0.0035, v1=10, and v2=30, but later in the same section the text says the evolution shown in Fig. 3 uses v1=10 and v2=20. This internal inconsistency should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (2)] As typeset, dOmega is written as dtheta2 + sin2 theta dphi2; it should read dtheta^2 + sin^2 theta dphi^2.
  3. [Appendix A] The convergence and constraint tests are presented only for the collapsing run (Fig. 3) and the adaptive-gauge run (Fig. 4a). Adding a convergence test for the vacuum expansion run of Fig. 2 would further strengthen the instability claim, since that run is the basis for the 'in vacuum the wormhole expands' statement.
  4. [Sec. III B] The pulse is placed only on the u=ui hypersurface, with phi=0 on the v=vi hypersurface. The paper would benefit from a brief statement on whether the results are sensitive to the pulse location or shape, at least for one alternative configuration.
  5. [Abstract] The phrase 'In vacuum, the wormhole expands' could be misread as the classical vacuum; in fact the renormalized stress-energy tensor is nonzero. Consider rewording to 'in the absence of classical matter' for precision.
  6. [Fig. 6] Several contour values in Figs. 6(b) and 6(c) are unlabeled on the plot; the caption lists them, but labeling at least a few contours directly in the figure would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the evolution is a genuine dynamical simulation with externally supplied static initial data and independently stated equations, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central input is the static quantum-corrected Schwarzschild/wormhole solution, which is taken from prior work by other authors (Fabbri et al., Ho-Matsuo, Arrechea et al., refs. [1-4]) rather than derived in this paper. The dynamical model is built from the standard Polyakov approximation with fixed parameter P and the double-null evolution equations, which are stated explicitly; the pulse amplitude and location are free inputs, not parameters fitted to the target result. No load-bearing claim is justified by a self-citation: the author's own references [22,25,26] are used only for comparisons to Ellis-Bronnikov wormholes and are not needed to establish instability, collapse, or evaporation. The instability inference is supported by the standard numerical signature that decreasing discretization error delays the departure from the static solution (Figs. 2a-2c), and code convergence is checked independently against the constraint equations (Appendix A). The only notable weakness is the explicitly inconsistent P=0 control run in Fig. 4(b), which the author labels as 'inconsistent evolution' and 'should not be taken too seriously'; that is a validity/interpretation concern about attributing the late-time decrease in the apparent-horizon radius to evaporation, not a circular reduction of the conclusion to the inputs. Since no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction and no derivation step is equivalent by construction to its own input, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Polyakov approximation, the divergence-as-singularity interpretation, and the static initial data from prior work. No new particles or forces are introduced; P and pulse parameters are chosen inputs rather than fitted outputs.

free parameters (3)
  • P, strength of the Polyakov correction = 0.1
    Chosen by hand for the main simulations; the paper does not fit it to the instability result. In the units c=G=hbar=1, P = N/(12*pi) with N the number of scalar fields, so P=0.1 corresponds to N about 3.77, a non-integer number of fields that is not discussed.
  • Scalar pulse amplitude A = A = 0.0035, 0.0005, and 5e-5
    Pulse amplitudes chosen to test the collapse threshold; the smallest tested corresponds to a 0.001 percent mass increase. Not fitted to a target outcome.
  • Pulse window v1, v2 = v1=10, v2=30 and v1=5, v2=10
    Initial pulse placement chosen for numerical convenience; the qualitative collapse result is robust across these choices.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Polyakov approximation for the renormalized stress-energy tensor, with the multiplicative factor 3P/r^2 and zero angular components, is a valid model of semiclassical backreaction.
    Adopted from refs [9-11] and used in prior evolutions [12-16]. All results inherit the accuracy of this approximation. Entered at Eq. (3) in Sec. II and Eq. (12) in Sec. III A.
  • domain assumption The divergence of the sigma evolution equation at r = sqrt(P) corresponds to the central singularity.
    The paper states this interpretation is 'not uncommon' in Sec. III A. If the divergence is an artifact of the Polyakov approximation instead, the collapse endpoint and singularity claims change.
  • domain assumption The static quantum corrected solutions from refs [1-4] are valid initial data for the evolution.
    The initial data is taken from those solutions without re-deriving them; Sec. II reviews the construction.
  • domain assumption At the outer boundary, quantum corrections decay fast enough that the classical Schwarzschild solution with ADM mass M applies.
    Used to set outer boundary values in Eqs. (7)-(8); the paper says 'one can show' but does not prove it in detail.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamical evolution and stability of quantum corrected Schwarzschild black holes in semiclassical gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RIBW6VWE

@misc{pith2026250700109,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamical evolution and stability of quantum corrected Schwarzschild black holes in semiclassical gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RIBW6VWE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00109}
}
read the original abstract

The Schwarzschild solution describes a classical static black hole in general relativity. When general relativity is extended by including semiclassical corrections in the form of a renormalized energy-momentum tensor, the horizon of the Schwarzschild black hole disappears and is replaced by a wormhole. We study the stability of this quantum corrected static Schwarzschild solution in semiclassical gravity by using it as the initial data of a dynamical evolution. We find that the quantum corrected solution is unstable and that the wormhole can expand or collapse when perturbed. In vacuum, the wormhole expands, but in the presence of even a small amount of classical matter, the wormhole collapses, forming a horizon and evolving to an evaporating black hole.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00109 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The solid lines of both plots display a quantum cor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Dynamical evolution of a static quantum corrected Schwarzschild black hole with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Dynamical evolution of a static quantum corrected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Contour diagrams for (a) the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Dynamical evolution of a static quantum corrected Schwarzschild black hole with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The convergence function in ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Equation ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Similar results have been found for the classical Reissner-Nordstr¨ om [5] and Einstein-Yang-Mills [6] black holes

    and subsequently confirmed in [2–4]. Similar results have been found for the classical Reissner-Nordstr¨ om [5] and Einstein-Yang-Mills [6] black holes. The question we ask is whether these static solutions, and hence worm- holes like that shown in Fig. 1, are stable with respect to time-dependent perturbations? If they are, then it may be possible for th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In each row, the value of σ(u, vi) is chosen such that the maximal value of σ on the row is equal to zero

    Adaptive gauge method The adaptive gauge method makes use of the coordi- nate gauge freedom of the system. In each row, the value of σ(u, vi) is chosen such that the maximal value of σ on the row is equal to zero. Since σ is a coordinate gauge field, this is perfectly consistent. Eilon and Ori refer to this as σ gauge. For our system, the maximum value al...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Ho and Y

    P.-M. Ho and Y. Matsuo, Static Black Hole and Vacuum Energy: Thin Shell and Incompressible Fluid, JHEP 03, 096, arXiv:1710.10390 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Fabbri, S

    A. Fabbri, S. Farese, J. Navarro-Salas, G. J. Olmo, and H. Sanchis-Alepuz, Semiclassical zero-temperature corrections to Schwarzschild spacetime and holography, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104023 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0512167

    arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Ho and Y

    P.-M. Ho and Y. Matsuo, Static Black Holes With Back Reaction From Vacuum Energy, Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 065012 (2018), arXiv:1703.08662 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Quantum corrected Einstein-Yang-Mills black holes in semiclassical gravity

    B. Kain, Quantum corrected Einstein-Yang-Mills black holes in semiclassical gravity, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044033 (2025), arXiv:2502.08278 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Arrechea, C

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, Schwarzschild geometry counterpart in semi- classical gravity, Phys. Rev. D 101, 064059 (2020), arXiv:1911.03213 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Reissner-Nordstr\"om geometry counterpart in semiclassical gravity

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, Reissner–nordstr¨ om geometry counterpart in semiclassical gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 115014 (2021), arXiv:2102.03544 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    P. C. W. Davies, S. A. Fulling, and W. G. Unruh, En- ergy Momentum Tensor Near an Evaporating Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D 13, 2720 (1976)

    1976

  2. [10]

    Berthiere, D

    C. Berthiere, D. Sarkar, and S. N. Solodukhin, The fate of black hole horizons in semiclassical gravity, Phys. Lett. B 786, 21 (2018), arXiv:1712.09914 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambrdige, UK, 1984)

    1984

  4. [12]

    Parentani and T

    R. Parentani and T. Piran, The Internal geometry of an evaporating black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2805 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9405007

    1994 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Davies and S

    P. Davies and S. A. Fulling, Quantum vacuum energy in two dimensional space-times, in Proc R Soc London Ser A, Vol. 354 (1977) pp. 59–77, 1676th ed

    1977

  6. [14]

    A. M. Polyakov, Quantum Geometry of Bosonic Strings, Phys. Lett. B 103, 207 (1981)

    1981

  7. [15]

    S. E. Hong, D.-i. Hwang, E. D. Stewart, and D.-h. Yeom, The Causal structure of dynamical charged black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 045014 (2010), arXiv:0808.1709 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Ayal and T

    S. Ayal and T. Piran, Spherical collapse of a massless scalar field with semiclassical corrections, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4768 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9704027

    1997 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Sorkin and T

    E. Sorkin and T. Piran, Formation and evaporation of charged black holes, Phys. Rev. D 63, 124024 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103090

    2001 arXiv

  10. [18]

    K. A. Bronnikov, Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge, Acta Phys. Polon. B 4, 251 (1973)

    1973

  11. [19]

    Hwang and D.-h

    D.-i. Hwang and D.-h. Yeom, Internal structure of charged black holes, Phys. Rev. D 84, 064020 (2011), arXiv:1010.2585 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  12. [20]

    H. G. Ellis, Ether flow through a drainhole - a particle model in general relativity, J. Math. Phys.14, 104 (1973)

    1973

  13. [21]

    Doroshkevich, J

    A. Doroshkevich, J. Hansen, I. Novikov, and A. Shatskiy, Passage of radiation through wormholes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 18, 1665 (2009), arXiv:0812.0702 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Shinkai and S

    H.-a. Shinkai and S. A. Hayward, Fate of the first traversible wormhole: Black hole collapse or inflationary expansion, Phys. Rev. D 66, 044005 (2002), arXiv:gr- qc/0205041

    2002

  15. [23]

    J. A. Gonz´ alez, F. S. Guzm´ an, and O. Sarbach, Insta- bility of wormholes supported by a ghost scalar field. II. Nonlinear evolution, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 015011 (2009), arXiv:0806.1370 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  16. [24]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Traversable Worm- 11 holes in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 091104 (2022), arXiv:2106.05034 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Calhoun, B

    K. Calhoun, B. Fay, and B. Kain, Matter traveling through a wormhole, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104054 (2022), arXiv:2210.04905 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, C. Knoll, and E. Radu, Traversable wormholes in Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 101102 (2021), arXiv:2010.07317 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Barcelo, R

    C. Barcelo, R. Carballo, and L. J. Garay, Two for- malisms, one renormalized stress-energy tensor, Phys. Rev. D 85, 084001 (2012), arXiv:1112.0489 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Kain, Probing the Connection between Entangled Par- ticles and Wormholes in General Relativity, Phys

    B. Kain, Probing the Connection between Entangled Par- ticles and Wormholes in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 101001 (2023), arXiv:2309.03314 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Kain, Are Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell wormholes traversable?, Phys

    B. Kain, Are Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell wormholes traversable?, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044019 (2023), arXiv:2305.11217 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    J. A. Gonz´ alez, F. S. Guzm´ an, and O. Sarbach, Insta- bility of wormholes supported by a ghost scalar field. I. Linear stability analysis, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 015010 (2009), arXiv:0806.0608 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Fabbri and J

    A. Fabbri and J. Navarro-Salas,Modeling black hole evap- oration (Imperial College Press, London and World Sci- entific Publishing, Singapore, 2005)

    2005

  24. [32]

    Eilon and A

    E. Eilon and A. Ori, Adaptive gauge method for long-time double-null simulations of spherical black- hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 93, 024016 (2016), arXiv:1510.05273 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Alcubierre, Introduction to 3+1 numerical relativity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2008)

    M. Alcubierre, Introduction to 3+1 numerical relativity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2008). 12

    2008

  26. [34]

    M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Wormholes in space-time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity, Am. J. Phys. 56, 395 (1988)

    1988

  27. [35]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Struc- ture of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Math- ematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, UK, 1975)

    1975

  28. [200]

    That the results are small indicates that the constraint equation is satisfied

    That the curves drop by a factor of 4 when the grid spacing drops by a factor of 2 indicates second-order convergence. That the results are small indicates that the constraint equation is satisfied

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.