REVIEW 3 cited by
ASTRO: Teaching Language Models to Reason by Reflecting and Backtracking In-Context
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ASTRO: Teaching Language Models to Reason by Reflecting and Backtracking In-Context
read the original abstract
We introduce ASTRO, the "Autoregressive Search-Taught Reasoner", a framework for training language models to reason like search algorithms, explicitly leveraging self-reflection, backtracking, and exploration in their outputs. Recently, training large language models (LLMs) via reinforcement learning (RL) has led to the advent of reasoning models with greatly enhanced reasoning capabilities. Open-source replications of reasoning models, while successful, build upon models that already exhibit strong reasoning capabilities along with search behavior observed even before RL. As a result, it is yet unclear how to boost the reasoning capabilities of other non-reasoner models including Llama 3. ASTRO teaches such models to internalize structured search behavior through a synthetic dataset derived from Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) over mathematical problem-solving trajectories. By converting search traces into natural language chain-of-thoughts that capture both successes and recoveries from failure, ASTRO bootstraps models with a rich prior for exploration during RL. We finetune our models on these search-derived traces and further improve performance via RL with verifiable rewards. We apply ASTRO to the Llama 3 family of models and achieve absolute performance gains of 16.0% on MATH-500, 26.9% on AMC 2023, and 20.0% on AIME 2024, especially improving upon challenging problems that require iterative correction. Our results demonstrate that search-inspired training offers a principled way to instill robust reasoning capabilities into open LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Credit Assignment with Resets in Language Model Reasoning
The paper introduces Random-Reset Policy Optimization (RRPO) and Self-Reset Policy Optimization (SRPO) that use resets to enable more precise credit assignment in RL for language model reasoning, with SRPO outperformi...
-
Search, Fail, Recover: A Training Framework for Correction-Aware Reasoning
Pyligent trains LLMs to search, detect failures via task validators, and backtrack to recoverable prefixes, improving solve rates by 13–73 points over gold-only SFT on hidden graphs, Sudoku, and Blocksworld.
-
Robots Need More than VLA and World Models
The paper identifies four missing interfaces (data autolabelling, embodiment retargeting, physics-grounded world models, and video-based reward inference) as the central bottleneck beyond VLA scaling for robot intelligence.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.