Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

We Urgently Need Privilege Management in MCP: A Measurement of API Usage in MCP Ecosystems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.06250 v1 pith:E3FJ2SJ5 submitted 2025-07-05 cs.CR cs.AIcs.SE

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.SE
keywords privilegeusageanalysisautomatedecosystemslessmodelsplugins
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as a widely adopted mechanism for connecting large language models to external tools and resources. While MCP promises seamless extensibility and rich integrations, it also introduces a substantially expanded attack surface: any plugin can inherit broad system privileges with minimal isolation or oversight. In this work, we conduct the first large-scale empirical analysis of MCP security risks. We develop an automated static analysis framework and systematically examine 2,562 real-world MCP applications spanning 23 functional categories. Our measurements reveal that network and system resource APIs dominate usage patterns, affecting 1,438 and 1,237 servers respectively, while file and memory resources are less frequent but still significant. We find that Developer Tools and API Development plugins are the most API-intensive, and that less popular plugins often contain disproportionately high-risk operations. Through concrete case studies, we demonstrate how insufficient privilege separation enables privilege escalation, misinformation propagation, and data tampering. Based on these findings, we propose a detailed taxonomy of MCP resource access, quantify security-relevant API usage, and identify open challenges for building safer MCP ecosystems, including dynamic permission models and automated trust assessment.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Parasites in the Toolchain: A Large-Scale Analysis of Attacks on the MCP Ecosystem

    cs.CR 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    This paper defines a new Parasitic Toolchain Attack pattern (MCP-UPD) that assembles legitimate tools into privacy-exfiltrating workflows and reports the first large-scale scan of 12230 MCP tools across 1360 servers r...

  2. A Taxonomy of Runtime Faults in Model Context Protocol Servers

    cs.SE 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An empirical taxonomy of 11 top-level categories and 27 subcategories of runtime faults in MCP servers, derived via open coding of GitHub threads and validated by a survey of 55 developers.

  3. AgentBound: Securing Execution Boundaries of AI Agents

    cs.CR 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    AgentBound is the first declarative access control framework for Model Context Protocol servers that generates policies from source code at 80.9% accuracy and blocks most threats in malicious servers with negligible overhead.

  4. Formalizing the Safety, Security, and Functional Properties of Agentic AI Systems

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces host agent and task lifecycle models plus 30 temporal logic properties to enable formal verification of liveness, safety, completeness, and fairness in agentic AI systems.

  5. Making OpenAPI Documentation Agent-Ready: Detecting Documentation and REST Smells with a Multi-Agent LLM System

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Hermes uses multi-agent LLMs to detect 2450 documentation and REST smells across 600 OpenAPI endpoints, demonstrating that structurally valid microservice APIs are often not semantically ready for agent consumption.

Pith tools