REVIEW 1 cited by
Exploring LLMs for Predicting Tutor Strategy and Student Outcomes in Dialogues
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Exploring LLMs for Predicting Tutor Strategy and Student Outcomes in Dialogues
read the original abstract
Tutoring dialogues have gained significant attention in recent years, given the prominence of online learning and the emerging tutoring abilities of artificial intelligence (AI) agents powered by large language models (LLMs). Recent studies have shown that the strategies used by tutors can have significant effects on student outcomes, necessitating methods to predict how tutors will behave and how their actions impact students. However, few works have studied predicting tutor strategy in dialogues. Therefore, in this work we investigate the ability of modern LLMs, particularly Llama 3 and GPT-4o, to predict both future tutor moves and student outcomes in dialogues, using two math tutoring dialogue datasets. We find that even state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to predict future tutor strategy while tutor strategy is highly indicative of student outcomes, outlining a need for more powerful methods to approach this task.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
MMTutorBench: The First Multimodal Benchmark for AI Math Tutoring
MMTutorBench is the first multimodal benchmark for AI math tutoring with 685 problems, problem-specific rubrics across six dimensions, and evaluations of 12 MLLMs revealing performance gaps versus humans.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.