The equilibrium distribution function for strongly nonlinear systems

Hong Zhao; Jialin Zhang; Yong Zhang

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 29 references

The equilibrium distribution function for strongly nonlinear systems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single correction term from nontrivial four-wave resonances fixes the equilibrium mode occupation formula for strongly nonlinear systems.

desk verdict A real candidate for beyond-RPA equilibrium distributions, with surprisingly good numerics, but the perturbation control and missing supplement need work before I'd trust the claimed range. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07600 v1 pith:3VGGC3T3 submitted 2025-07-10 cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MPnlin.CDphysics.class-ph

Jialin Zhang , Yong Zhang , Hong Zhao This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MPnlin.CDphysics.class-ph PACS 05.20.-y05.45.-a

keywords equilibriumdistributionstrongnonlinearityrandomphaseapproximationnontrivialresonancesgeneralizedequipartitiontheoremnonlinearSchrödingerequationMMTmodelFPUT-beta

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the equilibrium occupation of a mode in a strongly nonlinear system is not the Rayleigh–Jeans form with a shifted frequency, but a rational expression with an extra correction $\omega^*_k$ coming from nontrivial four-wave resonances. For the discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation this takes the explicit form $n_k = k_B T / ( \tilde{\omega}_k - 8 \beta \lambda^2 \sum^\ast_{123} n^0_1 n^0_2 n^0_3 \delta^{12}_{3k} - \mu )$, which the paper finds accurate in numerical simulations up to $b \gtrsim 200$. The same framework yields corrected distributions for the Majda–McLaughlin–Tabak models and the FPUT-$\beta$ chain, and it predicts average mode frequencies in agreement with simulation. A sympathetic reader would care because this extends equilibrium statistical mechanics beyond the weakly nonlinear regimes where the random phase approximation and Wick's theorem apply.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a generating functional $Z(J)$ built by coupling the Hamiltonian to two real external sources per mode, then expanding $e^{-\beta \lambda H_{\rm int}}$ to first order in $\lambda$. The first-order term gives the fourth-order moment $\langle a_1 a_2 a_3^* a_4^* \rangle_1 \simeq -4\beta\lambda\,\delta^{12}_{34} \prod_{j=1}^4 [\beta(\tilde{\omega}_j-\mu)]^{-1}$, which is then inserted into the generalized equipartition identity. This converts the otherwise vanishing nontrivial-resonance contribution into a computable occupation-number correction. The method defines the correction as an averaged distortion of the spectral structure, not a uniform frequency shift.

What would settle it

Directly compute the fourth-order moment $\langle a_1 a_2 a_3^* a_4^*\rangle$ in equilibrium NSE simulations at $b=200$ and compare it with the first-order expression (13); a deviation of more than a few percent would indicate that the truncation is not controlling the error even where Eq. (15) fits the distribution. Alternatively, measure the product $n_k(\tilde{\omega}_k - \mu - \omega^*_k)$ across many modes: if it depends noticeably on $k$, the reported closed form is not the whole story.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that nontrivial four-wave resonances contribute a nonzero, analytically computable term $\omega^*_k$ to the denominator of the equilibrium distribution, so that $n_k = k_B T / (\tilde{\omega}_k - \mu - \omega^*_k)$. For the discrete NSE, $\omega^*_k = 8\beta\lambda^2 \sum^\ast_{123} n^0_1 n^0_2 n^0_3 \delta^{12}_{3k}$, where the star excludes trivial resonances. The paper demonstrates numerically that this formula fits the exact equilibrium occupation over a wide range of nonlinear strengths, whereas the trivial-resonance renormalization fails when $b$ becomes large. In the MMT34 model the correction even reproduces a three-peaked frequency spectrum, indicating that the correction is a genuine spectral-structure effect rather than a uniform frequency shift.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation truncates the expansion of the Boltzmann weight at first order in $\lambda$ and replaces $n^0_k$ by $n_k$ in Eq. (14) with no controlled error estimate, so the accuracy at strong coupling (where $\beta\lambda$ is of order one) rests on an unquantified approximation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If correct, the formula gives an explicit closed-form equilibrium distribution for discrete NSE, MMT4, MMT34, and FPUT-$\beta$ in strongly nonlinear regimes.
Because the correction is computed from the trivial-resonance-renormalized occupations $n^0_k$, the method turns the strong-nonlinearity problem into a self-consistent algebraic calculation.
The average mode frequency $\bar{\omega}_k$ follows from the same formula via $\bar{\omega}_k = k_B T / n_k + \mu$, giving a prediction with no free parameters.
For the MMT34 model the observed three-peaked spectrum indicates that effective mode counting changes in strongly nonlinear systems; the corrected distribution nevertheless keeps ensemble averages valid.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the same first-order generating-functional closure could be applied to other quartic Hamiltonians with different dispersion relations, predicting where non-Lorentzian multi-peaked spectra should appear.
Editorial inference: the absence of a small parameter suggests there may be a resummation of the expansion—for instance, a self-consistent replacement of $n^0$ with $n$ in the numerator—that would extend validity beyond the tested range, a testable extension.
Editorial inference: the deviation from Wick's theorem implied by Eq. (13) can be measured in the same simulations by computing the excess kurtosis of the mode amplitudes; observing that it tracks $\omega^*_k$ would corroborate the colored-noise interpretation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here is my take. The genuinely new thing is the claim that the random phase approximation omits a specific class of nontrivial four-wave resonances, and that these produce a computable correction to the equilibrium occupation: n_k = k_B T / (tilde_omega_k - mu - omega*_k), with omega*_k given by Eq. 15 and analogous formulas for MMT and FPUT. As far as I know, the cited wave-turbulence and self-consistent-phonon literature stops at trivial resonances, so this is a real step. The method is also refreshingly direct: use exact equipartition, compute the fourth-order moment from a generating functional to first order in the nonlinearity, substitute back. The numerical agreement across three very different models—NSE, MMT4/MMT34, FPUT-beta—is remarkably good, up to b~200 for NSE and with a convincing qualitative feature, the frequency splitting in MMT34. Credit where due: that is a strong empirical case.

The soft spots are real and concentrated in the derivation. The expansion is truncated at first order in beta*lambda, but at the claimed validity boundary, b=200, L=256, T=0.1, beta*lambda is about 3.9, not small. The actual small parameter must be beta*lambda weighted by occupation factors and resonance sums, but the paper neither defines nor bounds it. The replacement of n0 by n in Eq. 14 is said to introduce only a higher-order error, but no estimate is given, and since the correction is then absorbed into the denominator, Eq. 15 is effectively a resummation of the first-order vertex. That can be legitimate—mean-field resummations work that way—but the authors need to show the second-order terms are subleading, or at least test the truncation numerically. As it stands, the claimed validity range rests on the numerics, not on the derivation.

Two smaller things. The FPUT-beta derivation and the detailed steps leading to Eqs. 12–14 are in the Supplemental Material, which is absent from the arXiv posting; that makes the paper hard to audit. And the theoretical curves depend on the total particle number N through the trivial-resonance shift; the text doesn't say whether N is taken from the simulations, computed self-consistently, or adjusted. Some error bars or ensemble statistics on the numerical spectra would also help.

Bottom line: the central physical idea is sound and the numerics are unusually persuasive. What's missing is a controlled truncation estimate plus the supplement. I would send this to a serious referee rather than desk-reject, and I would cite the nontrivial-resonance formula in my own work, with a caveat about the missing error analysis. Bring it to reading group.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a framework for computing equilibrium mode occupation distributions in strongly nonlinear systems, going beyond the random phase approximation (RPA). For the discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NSE), the authors use the generalized equipartition theorem and a generating functional to derive a correction term ω*_k that appears in the denominator: n_k = k_B T / (tilde_ω_k − μ − ω*_k). The correction is attributed to nontrivial four-wave resonances and is analytically computed from the first-order expansion in the nonlinear coupling λ. Analogous formulas are presented for the Majda–McLaughlin–Tabak (MMT) model and the FPUT-β model, and numerical simulations are shown to agree with the theoretical predictions in strongly nonlinear regimes, including a frequency-splitting phenomenon in MMT34.

Significance. If the result holds, it would extend equilibrium distribution theory beyond the near-integrable and weak-nonlinearity limits where RPA-based approaches operate. The paper gives explicit, analytically computable formulas and demonstrates impressive agreement with simulations across three distinct models, including the prediction of asymmetric spectra and frequency splitting. The use of the generalized equipartition theorem as a starting point is elegant and potentially widely applicable. However, the derivation's perturbative truncation is not controlled, and the supporting derivations for two of the three models are deferred to an absent Supplemental Material, so the breadth of the claim currently rests on the numerical evidence plus an un-audited calculation.

major comments (3)

[RJ distribution corrected by nontrivial resonances] Equations (12)–(15): The generating functional is expanded to first order in βλ, but the numerical tests reach b = 200, where βλ ≈ 3.9 for L = 256 and T = 0.1; thus βλ is not small. No dimensionless small parameter is identified, and the neglected O((βλ)^2) terms are not estimated. The replacement of n0 by n in Eq. (14) is asserted to introduce 'only a higher-order error' without a bound. Consequently, the claimed validity up to b ≳ 200 is not justified by the derivation itself; it is an empirical observation. Please provide a second-order calculation or a quantitative estimate of the neglected terms, and specify the actual expansion parameter (e.g., βλ multiplied by resonance-weighted occupation factors).
[MMT system / FPUT-β system] The derivations of Eqs. (19), (20), and the FPUT-β expression are entirely deferred to the Supplemental Material, which is not included in the manuscript. Since the paper's claim of generality across distinct nonlinear systems depends on these results, the referee cannot audit the truncation, the coefficients, or the treatment of different resonance types. The Supplemental Material must be provided for review; without it, these sections are unverifiable.
[Eq. (14)] The transition from the first-order moment correction (Eq. (13)) to the modified equipartition relation (Eq. (14)) is not shown. In particular, how the coefficient 8 arises and why the sum over n0_1 n0_2 n0_3 appears linearly in the denominator are not derived. Please include the intermediate algebra in the main text or in the (provided) Supplemental Material.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (20)] The notation 'F123' in Eq. (20) is confusing; since the right-hand side involves a sum over modes 1 and 2 with δ12_k, the quantity should be written as F_k or defined clearly with indices.
[Fig. 3 caption] The caption says 'the theoretical prediction from Eq.19 (or Fig.20)'; this should be 'Eq. 20' rather than 'Fig. 20'.
[Introduction] The statement that under RPA the averaged contribution of residual nonlinear interactions to the frequency shift vanishes is not proven or referenced in the text; please add a brief derivation or a citation to justify this claim.
[Notation across models] The symbol b is used both for the nonlinearity parameter in the NSE Hamiltonian (b/2 |ψ|^4) and for the quartic coupling in the MMT34 model; this overloads notation and may confuse readers comparing formulas.
[Fig. 1] Figure 1 shows only b = 30 and b = 200; the claim that Eq. (15) remains accurate 'up to b > 200' would be more convincing with additional intermediate values (e.g., b = 50, 100, 150).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction: Eq.15 is a closed first-order expression from the exact equipartition identity and generating-functional expansion; no simulated n_k is fitted.

full rationale

After walking the derivation chain, I find no step that reduces a prediction to its own input. The NSE result Eq.15 is obtained by three ingredients: (i) the exact generalized equipartition identity, Eq.8, which is an identity satisfied by the exact thermal state; (ii) a first-order expansion of the generating functional in βλ, Eqs.10-12, whose only statistical input is the Gaussian measure with occupation n0_k = 1/[β(ω~_k−μ)]; and (iii) the resulting explicit fourth-order moment, Eq.13. Inserting Eq.13 into Eq.8 gives the closed expression Eq.15. The right-hand side contains T, μ, L, b, and quantities computed from them; no per-mode simulated occupation is fitted. The replacement of n0 by n is explicitly identified as a higher-order error, and Eq.15 as displayed uses the bare n0 in the denominator sum, so the final formula is not made self-consistent in a way that would force agreement. The total particle number N enters ω~_k = ω_k + 2bN/L; in a canonical run N is either a conserved input or a self-consistently determined sum ∑n_k, not a fit of the predicted spectrum. The MMT formulas are structurally analogous, and the FPUT result is deferred to the Supplemental Material; the latter is an omitted-proof/rigor concern, not circularity. The lack of a small-parameter estimate at b≳200, where βλ can be O(1), is a serious correctness concern about the truncation, but an uncontrolled perturbative truncation is not the same as assuming the target distribution. Self-citations appear only in the introductory thermalization context and do not carry the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The only inputs are the thermodynamic parameters T, mu, and the coupling constants; no parameters are fitted to the simulation data, except that the total particle number N appearing in the trivial frequency shift may be sourced from the simulation. The derivation rests on a first-order expansion that is not controlled in the strong-nonlinearity regime.

free parameters (1)

Total particle number N (implicit in trivial-resonance shift) = not specified; possibly taken from simulation
The trivial-resonance frequency shift tilde_omega_k = omega_k + 2bN/L requires the total particle number N. The paper does not state how N is obtained for the theoretical curves; if extracted from the simulation, the prediction is partly data-driven.

assumptions (4)

standard math Generalized equipartition theorem: <x_i d(H-mu N)/d x_j> = k_B T delta_ij
Exact for a classical canonical ensemble with a uniform integration measure; used as the starting point in Eq. 4.
ad hoc to paper First-order truncation of the generating functional expansion in the nonlinear coupling lambda
Eq. 12 expands exp(-beta V) to first order in lambda and retains only the first correction to the fourth-order moment; no convergence or small-parameter justification is given for strong nonlinearity.
ad hoc to paper Replacement of n0 by n in Eq. 14 introduces only higher-order error
The paper substitutes n0 with n to obtain Eq. 15, asserting the error is higher-order without demonstrating it.
domain assumption The unperturbed system is the trivial-resonance renormalized Hamiltonian
The theory builds the perturbation series around the Hamiltonian with trivial-resonance frequency shifts (Eq. 9).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The equilibrium distribution function for strongly nonlinear systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3VGGC3T3

@misc{pith2026250707600,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The equilibrium distribution function for strongly nonlinear systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3VGGC3T3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07600}
}

read the original abstract

The equilibrium distribution function determines macroscopic observables in statistical physics. While conventional methods correct equilibrium distributions in weakly nonlinear or near-integrable systems, they fail in strongly nonlinear regimes. We develop a framework to get the equilibrium distributions and dispersion relations in strongly nonlinear many-body systems, incorporating corrections beyond the random phase approximation and capturing intrinsic nonlinear effects. The theory is verified on the nonlinear Schrodinger equation, the Majda-McLaughlin-Tabak model, and the FPUT-beta model, demonstrating its accuracy across distinct types of nonlinear systems. Numerical results show substantial improvements over existing approaches, even in strong nonlinear regimes. This work establishes a theoretical foundation for equilibrium statistical properties in strongly nonlinear systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07600 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** , this correction significantly improves the accuracy of theoretical predictions, with excellent agreement with numerical results up to b ≳ 200. Average frequency derived from the equilibrium distribution. For the kth mode, the average frequency is defined as¯ωk = − R ωSk(ω)dω R Sk(ω)dω , where Sk(ω) denotes the power spectral density of ak(t). From this, one can derive ¯ωk = kBT nk + µ (see SM). Accordingly, we ob… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. For the MMT4 model with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. FPUT- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[1]

Route to thermalization in the α-fermi– pasta–ulam system

Miguel Onorato, Lara Vozella, Davide Proment, and Yuri V Lvov. Route to thermalization in the α-fermi– pasta–ulam system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(14):4208–4213, 2015

work page 2015
[2]

Wave-turbulence origin of the instability of anderson lo- calization against many-body interactions

Zhen Wang, Weicheng Fu, Yong Zhang, and Hong Zhao. Wave-turbulence origin of the instability of anderson lo- calization against many-body interactions. Physical Re- view Letters, 124(18):186401, 2020

work page 2020
[3]

Wave turbulence and thermalization in one-dimensional chains

Miguel Onorato, Yuri V Lvov, Giovanni Dematteis, and Sergio Chibbaro. Wave turbulence and thermalization in one-dimensional chains. Physics Reports, 1040:1–36, 2023

work page 2023
[4]

Universality classes of thermalization and energy diffusion

Wei Lin, Weicheng Fu, Zhen Wang, Yong Zhang, and Hong Zhao. Universality classes of thermalization and energy diffusion. Physical Review E, 111(2):024122, 2025

work page 2025
[5]

Self-consistent phonon formulation of anharmonic lattice dynamics

NR Werthamer. Self-consistent phonon formulation of anharmonic lattice dynamics. Physical Review B, 1(2):572, 1970

work page 1970
[6]

Self-energy of phonons in an anharmonic crystal to o ( λ 4)

RS Tripathi and KN Pathak. Self-energy of phonons in an anharmonic crystal to o ( λ 4). Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996), 21(2):289–302, 1974

work page 1971
[7]

Self-consistent phonon calculations of lattice dynamical properties in cubic srtio 3 with first-principles anharmonic force con- stants

Terumasa Tadano and Shinji Tsuneyuki. Self-consistent phonon calculations of lattice dynamical properties in cubic srtio 3 with first-principles anharmonic force con- stants. Physical Review B, 92(5):054301, 2015

work page 2015
[8]

First-principles phonon quasiparticle theory applied to a strongly an- harmonic halide perovskite

Terumasa Tadano and Wissam A Saidi. First-principles phonon quasiparticle theory applied to a strongly an- harmonic halide perovskite. Physical Review Letters, 129(18):185901, 2022

work page 2022

Show all 29 references

[9]

Anharmonic phonon behavior via irreducible derivatives: Self-consistent per- turbation theory and molecular dynamics

Enda Xiao and Chris A Marianetti. Anharmonic phonon behavior via irreducible derivatives: Self-consistent per- turbation theory and molecular dynamics. Physical Re- view B, 107(9):094303, 2023

2023
[10]

Tree graphs and classical fields

David G Boulware and Lowell S Brown. Tree graphs and classical fields. Physical Review, 172(5):1628, 1968

1968
[11]

Con- servative black hole scattering at fifth post-minkowskian and first self-force order

Mathias Driesse, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, Benjamin Sauer, and Johann Usovitsch. Con- servative black hole scattering at fifth post-minkowskian and first self-force order. Physical Review Letters , 132(24):241402, 2024

2024
[12]

Schwarzschild metric from scattering amplitudes to all orders in GN

Stavros Mougiakakos and Pierre Vanhove. Schwarzschild metric from scattering amplitudes to all orders in GN . Physical Review Letters, 133(11):111601, 2024

2024
[13]

Renormalized phonons in nonlinear lat- tices: A variational approach

Junjie Liu, Sha Liu, Nianbei Li, Baowen Li, and Changqin Wu. Renormalized phonons in nonlinear lat- tices: A variational approach. Physical Review E , 91(4):042910, 2015

2015
[14]

Varia- tional approach to renormalized phonon in momentum- nonconserving nonlinear lattices

Junjie Liu, Baowen Li, and Changqin Wu. Varia- tional approach to renormalized phonon in momentum- nonconserving nonlinear lattices. Europhysics Letters, 114(4):40002, 2016

2016
[15]

Theory of the self-consistent har- monic approximation with application to solid neon

Thomas R Koehler. Theory of the self-consistent har- monic approximation with application to solid neon. Physical Review Letters, 17(2):89, 1966

1966
[16]

Phonons: Theory and experiments I: Lattice dynamics and Models of interatomic forces, vol- ume 34

Peter Br¨ uesch. Phonons: Theory and experiments I: Lattice dynamics and Models of interatomic forces, vol- ume 34. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

2012
[17]

Thermal conductivity of anharmonic lattices: Effective phonons and quantum corrections

Dahai He, Sahin Buyukdagli, and Bambi Hu. Thermal conductivity of anharmonic lattices: Effective phonons and quantum corrections. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 78(6):061103, 2008

2008
[18]

Origin of negative differential thermal resistance in a chain of two weakly coupled nonlinear lattices

Dahai He, Sahin Buyukdagli, and Bambi Hu. Origin of negative differential thermal resistance in a chain of two weakly coupled nonlinear lattices. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 80(10):104302, 2009

2009
[19]

Quantum thermal transport through anharmonic sys- tems: A self-consistent approach

Dahai He, Juzar Thingna, Jian-Sheng Wang, and Baowen Li. Quantum thermal transport through anharmonic sys- tems: A self-consistent approach. Physical Review B, 94(15):155411, 2016

2016
[20]

Anharmonic gr¨ uneisen theory based on self-consistent phonon theory: Impact of phonon- phonon interactions neglected in the quasiharmonic the- 6 ory

Ryota Masuki, Takuya Nomoto, Ryotaro Arita, and Terumasa Tadano. Anharmonic gr¨ uneisen theory based on self-consistent phonon theory: Impact of phonon- phonon interactions neglected in the quasiharmonic the- 6 ory. Physical Review B, 105(6):064112, 2022

2022
[21]

Wave turbulence , volume 825

Sergey Nazarenko. Wave turbulence , volume 825. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

2011
[22]

Renor- malized waves and discrete breathers in β-fermi-pasta- ulam chains

Boris Gershgorin, Yuri V Lvov, and David Cai. Renor- malized waves and discrete breathers in β-fermi-pasta- ulam chains. Physical review letters, 95(26):264302, 2005

2005
[23]

Effective dispersion in the focusing nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation.Physical Re- view E, 100(2):022215, 2019

Katelyn Plaisier Leisman, Douglas Zhou, JW Banks, Gregor Kovaˇ ciˇ c, and David Cai. Effective dispersion in the focusing nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation.Physical Re- view E, 100(2):022215, 2019

2019
[24]

Renor- malized resonance quartets in dispersive wave turbulence

Wonjung Lee, Gregor Kovaˇ ciˇ c, and David Cai. Renor- malized resonance quartets in dispersive wave turbulence. Physical review letters, 103(2):024502, 2009

2009
[25]

Interac- tions of renormalized waves in thermalized fermi-pasta- ulam chains

Boris Gershgorin, Yuri V Lvov, and David Cai. Interac- tions of renormalized waves in thermalized fermi-pasta- ulam chains. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 75(4):046603, 2007

2007
[26]

Double scaling in the relaxation time in the β-fermi-pasta-ulam-tsingou model

Yuri V Lvov and Miguel Onorato. Double scaling in the relaxation time in the β-fermi-pasta-ulam-tsingou model. Physical Review Letters, 120(14):144301, 2018

2018
[27]

4-wave dynamics in kinetic wave turbulence

Sergio Chibbaro, Giovanni Dematteis, and Lamberto Rondoni. 4-wave dynamics in kinetic wave turbulence. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 362:24–59, 2018

2018
[28]

A one-dimensional model for dispersive wave tur- bulence

Andrew J Majda, David W McLaughlin, and EG1431687 Tabak. A one-dimensional model for dispersive wave tur- bulence. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 7:9–44, 1997

1997
[29]

Studies of the nonlinear problems

Enrico Fermi, P Pasta, Stanislaw Ulam, and Mary Tsin- gou. Studies of the nonlinear problems. Technical report, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), 1955

1955

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Route to thermalization in the α-fermi– pasta–ulam system

Miguel Onorato, Lara Vozella, Davide Proment, and Yuri V Lvov. Route to thermalization in the α-fermi– pasta–ulam system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(14):4208–4213, 2015

work page 2015

[2] [2]

Wave-turbulence origin of the instability of anderson lo- calization against many-body interactions

Zhen Wang, Weicheng Fu, Yong Zhang, and Hong Zhao. Wave-turbulence origin of the instability of anderson lo- calization against many-body interactions. Physical Re- view Letters, 124(18):186401, 2020

work page 2020

[3] [3]

Wave turbulence and thermalization in one-dimensional chains

Miguel Onorato, Yuri V Lvov, Giovanni Dematteis, and Sergio Chibbaro. Wave turbulence and thermalization in one-dimensional chains. Physics Reports, 1040:1–36, 2023

work page 2023

[4] [4]

Universality classes of thermalization and energy diffusion

Wei Lin, Weicheng Fu, Zhen Wang, Yong Zhang, and Hong Zhao. Universality classes of thermalization and energy diffusion. Physical Review E, 111(2):024122, 2025

work page 2025

[5] [5]

Self-consistent phonon formulation of anharmonic lattice dynamics

NR Werthamer. Self-consistent phonon formulation of anharmonic lattice dynamics. Physical Review B, 1(2):572, 1970

work page 1970

[6] [6]

Self-energy of phonons in an anharmonic crystal to o ( λ 4)

RS Tripathi and KN Pathak. Self-energy of phonons in an anharmonic crystal to o ( λ 4). Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996), 21(2):289–302, 1974

work page 1971

[7] [7]

Self-consistent phonon calculations of lattice dynamical properties in cubic srtio 3 with first-principles anharmonic force con- stants

Terumasa Tadano and Shinji Tsuneyuki. Self-consistent phonon calculations of lattice dynamical properties in cubic srtio 3 with first-principles anharmonic force con- stants. Physical Review B, 92(5):054301, 2015

work page 2015

[8] [8]

First-principles phonon quasiparticle theory applied to a strongly an- harmonic halide perovskite

Terumasa Tadano and Wissam A Saidi. First-principles phonon quasiparticle theory applied to a strongly an- harmonic halide perovskite. Physical Review Letters, 129(18):185901, 2022

work page 2022