Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 2 cited by

Anomalous charge density wave in altermagnetism

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Charge density wave turns altermagnetic WO into a metal

desk verdict A genuinely new CDW concept in an altermagnet, with solid phonon evidence but an inferred mechanism that needs quantitative proof before the 'anomalous' label is fully earned. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15429 v2 pith:KNBMXE55 submitted 2025-07-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Zi-Hao Ding , Lei Wang , Zhen-Feng Ouyang , Jingsi Qiao , Ze-Feng Gao , Wei Ji , Kai Liu , Peng-Jie Guo
show 1 more author
Zhong-Yi Lu
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall PACS 71.45.Lr
keywords altermagnetismchargedensitywaveanomalousCDWmonolayerWOsemimetal-to-metaltransitionfunctionaltheoryphononinstabilityW5dcrystal-fieldsplitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts that monolayer tungsten oxide (WO) hosts a charge density wave (CDW) that behaves opposite to the usual Peierls picture: instead of opening a gap and suppressing metallicity, the $\sqrt{2}\times\sqrt{2}$ lattice distortion raises the density of states at the Fermi level by a factor of 2.32, turning the altermagnetic semimetal into a metal. Using symmetry analysis, first-principles phonon calculations, and electronic-structure calculations, the authors argue that altermagnetism is essential for stabilizing this distortion, since the same distortion in nonmagnetic WO leaves imaginary phonon modes. They also argue that the energy gain comes from occupied W $5d$ states shifting downward far from the Fermi level, not from Fermi-surface nesting. If correct, this identifies a concrete two-dimensional material where an anomalous CDW and altermagnetism coexist, and suggests that magnetism can turn a CDW from a metallicity-killer into a metallicity-enhancer.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $\sqrt{2}\times\sqrt{2}$ CDW distortion of monolayer WO, obtained from the two imaginary phonon modes of the normal $P4/mmm$ phase (one at M, one at $\Gamma$, both involving W-atom vibrations). After relaxation the structure has $P\bar{4}2_1m$ symmetry and remains d-wave altermagnetic. The mechanism that makes the CDW anomalous is the crystal-field reorganization of the W $5d$ orbitals in the distorted rectangular coordination: occupied $d_{x^2-y^2}$, $d_{xy}$, and $d_{z^2}$ states shift down in energy far from the Fermi level, providing the stabilization, while the Fermi-crossing $d_{xz}$ and $d_{yz}$ states shift up, enlarging the Fermi surface and enhancing the DOS.

What would settle it

A phonon calculation of the $\sqrt{2}\times\sqrt{2}$ distorted monolayer WO under ferromagnetic or conventional collinear antiferromagnetic order would settle the altermagnetism-specific claim: if either order also removes all imaginary frequencies, the claim that altermagnetism is specifically responsible for stabilizing the CDW is falsified. Experimentally, angle-resolved photoemission or scanning tunneling spectroscopy across the CDW transition would test the predicted 2.32-fold increase in Fermi-level density of states.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claim is that monolayer WO is the first material in which an anomalous CDW is realized in an altermagnet. The CDW is a $\sqrt{2}\times\sqrt{2}$ superstructure driven by in-plane and out-of-plane relative vibrations of W atoms, which becomes dynamically stable only in the altermagnetic state. In the CDW phase the DOS at the Fermi level is 2.32 times that of the normal phase, so the phase transition is a semimetal-to-metal transition. The paper attributes the stabilization not to the conventional gap-opening mechanism or to Fermi-surface nesting (the Lindhard susceptibility shows no nesting instability), but to the lowering of locally occupied bands far from the Fermi level, induced by a crystal-field change in the distorted $P\bar{4}2_1m$ structure: the $d_{xz}$ and $d_{yz}$ orbitals move up while $d_{x^2-y^2}$, $d_{xy}$, and $d_{z^2}$ move down. Altermagnetism is stated as playing a crucial role, because nonmagnetic WO in the same distorted structure has pronounced imaginary phonon frequencies and hence no stable CDW.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central mechanism rests on two unproven baselines: that the nonmagnetic calculation is the right reference for judging altermagnetism's role in stabilizing the CDW, and that the orbital band shifts shown in the projected band structure fully account for the total-energy gain of the distortion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Monolayer WO becomes a concrete two-dimensional platform where $\sqrt{2}\times\sqrt{2}$ CDW order and d-wave altermagnetism coexist.
  • In the CDW phase the material is a metal with a Fermi-level DOS 2.32 times larger than in the normal phase, so the transition is semimetal-to-metal rather than metal-to-insulator.
  • Because the stabilization does not rely on Fermi-surface nesting, the usual nesting-based search for CDW materials would miss this phase; crystal-field and magnetic-stability criteria are needed instead.
  • Nonmagnetic WO in the same distorted structure is dynamically unstable, so any experimental realization of monolayer WO must take the altermagnetic order into account to see the CDW.
  • The three features defining the anomalous CDW are argued to extend generically to other magnetic phases, including collinear and non-collinear antiferromagnets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the anomalous CDW behaves as predicted, the usual competition between CDW and superconductivity is inverted in this family: superconductivity, if present, should be sought inside the CDW phase rather than after melting it. This is an extension of the paper's logic, not a claim it makes.
  • A total-energy decomposition of the CDW gain into orbital channels would upgrade the band-projection evidence into a directly computed mechanism, giving a sharper test of the proposed crystal-field stabilization.
  • Applying the same symmetry analysis to the isostructural monolayers CrO and MoO could reveal whether the anomalous CDW is specific to W's $5d$ orbitals or a generic feature of d-wave altermagnetic semimetals.
  • Strain or an external magnetic field that rotates the easy axis may switch between normal and CDW phases, since the magnetic point group controls the relevant spin symmetries; this suggests a possible switching device based on altermagnetic CDW.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports first-principles calculations on monolayer WO in its d-wave altermagnetic phase. It identifies a sqrt(2)×sqrt(2) phonon instability in the normal phase (M and Γ modes), shows the distorted supercell is dynamically stable in the altermagnetic state, and shows the nonmagnetic counterpart remains unstable. In the distorted phase, the DFT DOS at the Fermi level is 2.32 times larger than in the normal phase, converting the semimetal into a metal. The authors interpret this as an 'anomalous CDW', proposed to be stabilized by occupied d states shifting to lower energies far from the Fermi level rather than by gap opening near the Fermi level, with altermagnetism playing a crucial stabilizing role.

Significance. If substantiated, this would be a concrete material candidate for a CDW that enhances metallicity, a qualitatively new behavior relative to conventional CDWs, and it would connect this behavior to altermagnetism. The phonon calculations and the direct DOS comparison are genuine ab initio results, and the Lindhard susceptibility check is a useful negative test against Fermi-surface nesting. The main weakness is that the central 'anomalous' mechanism is inferred from projected band shifts rather than demonstrated by an energy decomposition, and the altermagnetism-specific role is inferred from a single nonmagnetic baseline. The concept is interesting and the material candidate is plausible, but the proof of the mechanism remains incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results and analysis, Fig. 4(b)-(c)] The central 'anomalous' mechanism claim is not directly established. The paper infers that the CDW is stabilized by occupied states shifting to lower energies far from the Fermi level solely from the d-orbital projected band structures in Fig. 4(b)-(c) and the schematic crystal-field diagram in Fig. 4(a). No total-energy decomposition or energy-resolved analysis (e.g., a band-energy sum over occupied d states, or projected DOS differences) is provided. The observed DOS enhancement at the Fermi level (factor 2.32, Fig. 3) does not by itself discriminate the proposed mechanism from a conventional CDW that removes a small Fermi-surface pocket while renormalizing many occupied bands. I ask the authors to add a quantitative energy decomposition to support the 'anomalous' label.
  2. [Results and analysis, Fig. 2(g) and 'Therefore, altermagnetism plays a crucial role...'] The conclusion that altermagnetism plays a crucial role in stabilizing the sqrt(2)×sqrt(2) CDW rests on a single comparison between altermagnetic and nonmagnetic WO in Fig. 2(g). To support claim (iii), the authors should also compute the phonon stability of the same distorted supercell for other magnetic orders, such as ferromagnetic or conventional collinear antiferromagnetic configurations. Without those calculations, the results only show that magnetism in some form is needed, not that the d-wave altermagnetic order in particular is responsible.
  3. [Results and analysis, 'A natural question is what causes the sqrt(2)×sqrt(2) CDW...' paragraph] The text states that the CDW 'likely arises from the synergy of electron-phonon coupling with altermagnetism' after ruling out Fermi-surface nesting via a Lindhard susceptibility calculation relegated to the SM. As written, this is a hypothesis rather than a result; the manuscript does not present electron-phonon coupling matrix elements or a mode-resolved coupling analysis that would allow this statement to be tested. The authors should either provide such calculations or soften the language to reflect what the phonon and electronic-structure data directly establish.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Introduction, first paragraph] There is a typo in the introduction: 'altermagentic' should be 'altermagnetic'.
  2. [Fig. 2(f) and surrounding text] The text says there are no imaginary frequencies in the CDW phase while also noting a tiny imaginary frequency at Γ caused by the finite-displacement method; this should be rephrased (e.g., 'no significant imaginary frequencies except a numerical artifact at Γ'), and the density-functional perturbation theory result should be shown in the main text or clearly referenced.
  3. [Results and analysis, DOS comparison] The DOS enhancement factor of 2.32 should be accompanied by the actual DOS values and the smearing/broadening parameters used, since the ratio can be sensitive to these choices.
  4. [Fig. 3(c) and 3(f)] The Fermi-surface plots use colors to represent carrier group velocities, but no color bar or scale is provided, making quantitative reading impossible.
  5. [Methods and Hubbard U discussion] The Hubbard U = 2.2 eV is the only adjustable parameter in the electronic-structure calculations; a brief statement on the sensitivity of the phonon instability and DOS ratio to U (at least in the SM) would increase confidence in the conclusions.
  6. [Supplementary Material reference] The SM reference [53] contains a placeholder URL (http://link.aps.org/xxx) and should be updated in the published version.
  7. [Discussion of Fig. 4] The phrase 'fully consistent with the proposed mechanism' is too strong given the qualitative nature of the projected band comparison; 'consistent with' alone would be more appropriate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CDW stabilization and metallicity increase are ab initio outputs; the mechanism interpretation is under-supported but not circular.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained first-principles computation rather than a reduction to inputs. The sqrt2 x sqrt2 CDW is inferred from imaginary phonon modes at M and Gamma in the normal altermagnetic phase (Fig. 2(a)-(d)); the distorted phase is relaxed and confirmed dynamically stable for altermagnetic WO while nonmagnetic WO retains pronounced imaginary frequencies (Fig. 2(f)-(g)). This is an external, falsifiable comparison. The electronic structure inputs are standard: PBE, PAW, and U=2.2 eV taken from prior literature (refs. 55-56), not fitted to the CDW energy; the altermagnetic ground state is checked across a range of U. Self-citations (e.g., refs. 21, 29) are used for context or analogy, not as proof of the CDW mechanism, so they are not load-bearing. The only soft point is the mechanism attribution in the 'Another important question' paragraph near Fig. 4: the paper states 'the large downward shift stabilizes the CDW phase' based on d-orbital projected band shifts, without a total-energy decomposition. That is an evidentiary gap in the causal claim, but it is not circular: the conclusion does not equal its input by construction, and the paper explicitly argues against Fermi-surface nesting via Lindhard susceptibility. Hence no circular step is identified; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central prediction rests on DFT+U with U = 2.2 eV for W 5d, on the assumption that the magnetic ground state is d-wave altermagnetic in both normal and CDW structures, and on the interpretation that phonon instabilities plus orbital-level shifts identify a CDW stabilized by occupied-state lowering. No code or input files are provided; key U-dependence, DFPT, and Lindhard results are in an unavailable SM. One invented conceptual entity, the anomalous CDW, is introduced without an independent experimental handle.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U for W 5d orbitals = 2.2 eV
    Taken from prior studies (refs 55-56) and used in all electronic structure and phonon calculations of the CDW phase; the magnetic ground state is said to persist across a range of U in the SM, but the presented band structures and DOS all use U = 2.2 eV.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PBE+U approximation describes the electronic and magnetic ground state of monolayer WO
    All band structures, phonons, and DOS assume DFT+U with U = 2.2 eV is quantitatively reliable for this 5d oxide; no comparison to hybrid functionals or experiment is provided in the main text.
  • domain assumption Altermagnetic order is preserved in the CDW-distorted structure
    The paper states the magnetic ground state remains d-wave altermagnetic, but the evidence is in the SM; the entire electronic-structure analysis of the CDW phase assumes this order.
  • domain assumption Imaginary phonon modes of the normal phase indicate a dynamical instability toward the sqrt(2) x sqrt(2) CDW
    Standard interpretation, but the conclusion that the M and Gamma modes are due to a CDW rather than another distortion relies on the phonon spectra of the distorted supercell showing no imaginary modes.
  • ad hoc to paper Stabilization by occupied states shifting lower follows from the change in d-orbital projected band positions
    The mechanism claim is inferred from Fig. 4 band shifts; no total-energy decomposition or electron-phonon coupling constant is computed to isolate this contribution.
invented entities (1)
  • Anomalous charge density wave
    purpose: A CDW category whose stabilization comes from lowering occupied states far from the Fermi level and which enhances metallicity instead of suppressing it.
    The paper introduces this as a new phase concept and claims WO as its first realization, but the only evidence is the DFT calculation of one material; no experimental signature or additional falsifiable consequence is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalous charge density wave in altermagnetism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KNBMXE55

@misc{pith2026250715429,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalous charge density wave in altermagnetism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KNBMXE55}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15429}
}
read the original abstract

Exploring the intricate interplay between magnetism and charge density waves has long been a fundamental pursuit at the forefront of condensed matter research. In this letter, based on symmetry analysis and first-principles calculations, we propose for the first time that anomalous charge density wave can be realized in two-dimensional altermagnetic WO. The anomalous charge density wave is characterized by three key features: (i) Unlike conventional charge density wave, whose stabilization is driven by the opening of a gap near the Fermi level, the anomalous charge density wave is stabilized by the occupied states with energies shifting lower far away from the Fermi level; (ii) the anomalous charge density wave increases the density of states near the Fermi level and then enhances-rather than diminishes-the metallicity of materials; (iii) altermagnetism plays a crucial role in stabilizing anomalous charge density wave. Thus, our work offers a pathway for exploring both the realization and the underlying mechanisms of anomalous charge density waves in magnetic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.15429 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the (a) Peierls/conventional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Phonon spectrum for the normal phase of mono [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) and (d) are electronic band structures and density of states without SOC for normal phase and CDW phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Schematic diagram of crystal field splitting in 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Emergent d-wave altermagnetism in chlorine-adsorbed FeSe monolayer

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Hole-doped, single-side Cl-adsorbed monolayer FeSe is predicted to host a robust d-wave altermagnetic state with up to 620 meV spin splitting.

  2. Ultrafast optical route to coupled ferroelectric and altermagnetic switching

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LiV2F6 is predicted to host charge-order-induced altermagnetism and ferroelectricity that reverse together under ultrafast laser-driven charge transfer in about 15 fs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    School of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

    work page

  2. [2]

    Key Laboratory of Quantum State Construction and Manipulation (Ministry of Education), Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

    work page

  3. [3]

    School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China

    work page

  4. [4]

    School of Integrated Circuits and Electronics& Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Sciences, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China and

    work page

  5. [5]

    Hefei National Laboratory, Hefei 230088, China (Dated: September 16, 2025) Exploring the intricate interplay between magnetism and charge density waves has long been a fundamental pursuit at the forefront of condensed matter research. In this letter, based on symmetry analysis and first-principles calculations, we propose for the first time that anomalous...

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, et al., Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat. Commun. 15, 2116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. ˇSmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken Kramers Degeneracy in Altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Krempask` y, L

    J. Krempask` y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. D’souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl ´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, et al., Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy, Nature 626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115102 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Large Band Splitting in g-Wave Altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206401 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the al- termagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature 638, 645 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, et al., Three-dimensional map- ping of the altermagnetic spin splitting in CrSb, Nat. Commun. 16, 1442 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, et al., A metallic room- temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys. 21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Effi- cient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of Spin Splitting Torque in a Collinear Antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of Spin-Splitter Torque in Collinear Antiferromagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and Tunneling Mag- netoresistance in Unconventional Collinear Antiferro- magnets with Nonrelativistic Spin-Momentum Coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Tsym- bal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nat. Commun. 12, 7061 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Predictable gate-field control of spin in alter- magnets with spin-layer coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 056401 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    W. Chen, X. Zhou, W.-K. Lou, and K. Chang, Magneto- optical conductivity and circular dichroism in d-wave al- termagnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, 064428 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakat- suji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous hall antiferromagnets, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 482 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    On the other hand, the combination of alter- magnetism with other matter phases has also attracted widespread interest

    effects. On the other hand, the combination of alter- magnetism with other matter phases has also attracted widespread interest. The anisotropic spin-splitting al- termagnetism without time-reversal symmetry merging with topology gives rise to new topological phases[21, 28– 33...

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Guo, Z.-X

    P.-J. Guo, Z.-X. Liu, and Z.-Y. Lu, Quantum anomalous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnetism, npj Comput. Mater. 9, 70 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Hou, H.-C

    X.-Y. Hou, H.-C. Yang, Z.-X. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.- Y. Lu, Large intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in both Nb2FeB2 and Ta 2FeB2 with collinear antiferromag- netism, Phys. Rev. B 107, L161109 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, X. Yang, G.-Y. Guo, and Y. Yao, Crystal chirality magneto-optical effects in collinear an- tiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 104, 024401 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    L. Han, X. Fu, W. He, J. Dai, Y. Zhu, W. Yang, Y. Chen, J. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Bai, C. Chen, D. Hou, C. Wan, X. Han, C. Song, J. Liu, and F. Pan, Nonvolatile anoma- lous nernst effect in mn 5si3 with a collinear n´ eel vector, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 044066 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Crystal Thermal Transport in Altermagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Tan, Z.-F

    C.-Y. Tan, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, Z.-X. Liu, K. Liu, P.- J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Crystal valley hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 111, 094411 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. F. Vender- 6 bos, Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 096703 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Tan, Z.-F

    C.-Y. Tan, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, K. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Bipolarized weyl semimetals and quantum crystal valley hall effect in two-dimensional altermagnetic materials (2024), arXiv:2406.16603

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Z.-F. Gao, S. Qu, B. Zeng, Y. Liu, J.-R. Wen, H. Sun, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Ai-accelerated discovery of alter- magnetic materials, Natl. Sci. Rev. 12, nwaf066 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Y.-X. Li, Y. Liu, and C.-C. Liu, Creation and manipu- lation of higher-order topological states by altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, L201109 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Feng, C.-Y

    P. Feng, C.-Y. Tan, M. Gao, X.-W. Yan, Z.-X. Liu, P.-J. Guo, F. Ma, and Z.-Y. Lu, Type-II quantum spin hall insulator (2025), arXiv:2503.13397

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, Y. Wang, J. Duan, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Quantized Spin-Hall Conductivity in Al- termagnet Fe 2Te2O with Mirror-Spin Coupling (2025), arXiv:2503.10681

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic met- als, Phys. Rev. B 108, 184505 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    L. V. Pupim and M. S. Scheurer, Adatom engineer- ing magnetic order in superconductors: Applications to altermagnetic superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 146001 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´ c, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferro- electricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106801 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106802 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetic multiferroics and altermagne- toelectric effect (2024), arXiv:2411.19928

    L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetic multiferroics and altermagne- toelectric effect (2024), arXiv:2411.19928

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    P.-J. Guo, Y. Gu, Z.-F. Gao, and Z.-Y. Lu, Altermagnetic ferroelectric LiFe2F6 and spin-triplet excitonic insulator phase (2023), arXiv:2312.13911

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Gruner, Density waves in solids(CRC press, 2018)

    G. Gruner, Density waves in solids(CRC press, 2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    Gr¨ uner, The dynamics of charge-density waves, Rev

    G. Gr¨ uner, The dynamics of charge-density waves, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 1129 (1988)

    1988

  40. [48]

    X. Zhu, Y. Cao, J. Zhang, E. W. Plummer, and J. Guo, Classification of charge density waves based on their na- ture, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 2367 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    X. Zhu, J. Guo, J. Zhang, and E. Plummer, Misconcep- tions associated with the origin of charge density waves, Adv. Phys. X 2, 622 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    M. D. Johannes and I. I. Mazin, Fermi surface nesting and the origin of charge density waves in metals, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165135 (2008)

    2008

  43. [51]

    C.-W. Chen, J. Choe, and E. Morosan, Charge density waves in strongly correlated electron systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 084505 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    D. F. Agterberg, J. S. Davis, S. D. Edkins, E. Fradkin, D. J. Van Harlingen, S. A. Kivelson, P. A. Lee, L. Radz- ihovsky, J. M. Tranquada, and Y. Wang, The physics of pair-density waves: cuprate superconductors and be- yond, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 231 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    C. Xu, S. Wu, G.-X. Zhi, G. Cao, J. Dai, C. Cao, X. Wang, and H.-Q. Lin, Altermagnetic ground state in distorted Kagome metal CsCr 3Sb5, Nat. Commun. 16, 3114 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    R. B. Regmi, H. Bhandari, B. Thapa, Y. Hao, N. Sharma, J. McKenzie, X. Chen, A. Nayak, M. El Gazzah, B. G. M´ arkus,et al., Altermagnetism in the layered interca- lated transition metal dichalcogenide CoNb 4Se8, Nat. Commun. 16, 4399 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    Candelora, M

    C. Candelora, M. Xu, S. Cheng, A. D. Vita, D. Ro- manin, C. Bigi, M. B. Petersen, A. LaFleur, M. Ca- landra, J. Miwa, Y. Hwang, Z. Wang, F. Mazzola, and I. Zeljkovic, Discovery of magnetic-field-tunable density waves in a layered altermagnet (2025), arXiv:2503.03716

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    X. Chen, D. Wang, L. Li, and B. Sanyal, Giant spin- splitting and tunable spin-momentum locked transport in room temperature collinear antiferromagnetic semimetal- lic cro monolayer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 022402 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Wu, Y.-L

    B. Wu, Y.-L. Song, W.-X. Ji, P.-J. Wang, S.-F. Zhang, and C.-W. Zhang, Quantum anomalous Hall effect in an antiferromagnetic monolayer of MoO, Phys. Rev. B 107, 214419 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    D. I. Khomskii, Transition metal compounds(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    2014

  51. [59]

    See supplemental material at http://link.aps.org/xxx, which includes a detailed description of computational methods as well as supplemental figures

  52. [60]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, et al., Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantumsimulations of materials, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  53. [61]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  54. [62]

    C. E. Calderon, J. J. Plata, C. Toher, C. Oses, O. Levy, M. Fornari, A. Natan, M. J. Mehl, G. Hart, M. Buon- giorno Nardelli, and S. Curtarolo, The aflow standard for high-throughput materials science calculations, Comput. Mater. 108, 233 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  56. [64]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  57. [65]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  58. [66]

    Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J

    A. Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 012001 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011)

    2011

  60. [68]

    A. M. Ganose, A. Searle, A. Jain, and S. M. Griffin, Ifermi: A python library for fermi surface generation and analysis, J. Open Source Softw. 6, 3089 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  62. [70]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gi- annozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.