Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 54 references

Ultrastable, low-error dynamic polarization encoding of deterministically generated single photons

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper demonstrates a free-space Sagnac interferometer that encodes BB84 polarization states onto single photons at 151.894 MHz with a 0.69(2)% error rate, the lowest reported for high-speed single-photon encoding.

desk verdict A clean Sagnac encoder demo for QD single photons with a record-low QBER claim that is not yet substantiated because the closest prior Sagnac-SPS experiment is missing from the comparison table. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16578 v1 pith:QJCOGFAM submitted 2025-07-22 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics

Joscha Hanel , Zenghui Jiang , Jipeng Wang , Frederik Benthin , Tom Fandrich , Eddy Patrick Rugeramigabo , Raphael Joos , Michael Jetter
show 5 more authors
Simone Luca Portalupi Jingzhong Yang Michael Zopf Peter Michler Fei Ding
This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics PACS 42.50.Ex03.67.Dd
keywords single-photonsourcequantumdotsSagnacinterferometerpolarizationencodingBB84protocolkeydistributionbiterrorratetelecomC-band
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first polarization encoder for single-photon qubits built from a free-space Sagnac interferometer, and claims it reaches the lowest error rate reported to date for high-speed information encoding on single photons. Using a quantum dot emitting at 1560.4 nm, deterministically generated photons are modulated into the four BB84 polarization states (the two-basis set used in quantum key distribution) at 151.894 MHz with a quantum bit error rate of 0.69(2)% and an encoding agreement of 96.5(2)% with the ideal states. The central claim is that the Sagnac geometry, in which the two interferometer paths share the same physical optics, removes the environmental phase drift that limits single-pass interferometric encoders, so low error and long-term stability come from the architecture itself rather than from active stabilization. The module runs for 60 hours with output polarization deviations at the $10^{-4}$ level and no temperature or mechanical control. If true, this removes a practical bottleneck for quantum key distribution and other single-photon protocols that need fast, robust state preparation.

What carries the argument

The free-space Sagnac interferometer (FSSI): a loop in which both interferometer arms are the same physical path, so clockwise and counterclockwise light accumulate identical phase and the interferometer is intrinsically stable. Its essential elements are a Wollaston polarizer with $10^{6}$ extinction that both creates the two arms and filters the recombined output, a low-$V_\pi$ phase modulator ($V_\pi = 4.2$ V) driven by an arbitrary waveform generator synchronized to the excitation laser, and a 3.3 ns delay between the arms so the modulator imprints a different phase on the early (clockwise) and late (counterclockwise) photon components. The combination converts applied voltages into the four BB84 states, and the shared-path geometry means any environmental disturbance affects both components identically, converting potential phase error into loss rather than bit error.

What would settle it

Leave the full chain (quantum-dot source, encoder, connection fiber, decoder) running for many hours without touching the fiber polarization controller and compute the single-photon QBER minute by minute: if the QBER drifts substantially above 0.69% (for example above 1%) over the course of a day while the loop-only polarization stays at the reported $10^{-4}$ level, the record-low value reflects the controlled short-term measurement rather than long-term operational encoding. As a second test, widen or remove the 2.65 ns temporal filter: if the QBER degrades markedly when the rejected ~10% of events are included, the error floor depends on discarding mistimed photons, which a real protocol could only do at the cost of efficiency or security.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a free-space Sagnac interferometer, not a single-pass Mach-Zehnder or Michelson setup, is the right carrier for dynamic polarization encoding of deterministic single photons. In this design an input $|D\rangle$ state is split by a Wollaston polarizer into clockwise and counterclockwise components that traverse the same phase modulator, fibers, and waveplates; a 3.3 ns path delay lets the modulator apply a relative phase $\phi \in \{0, \pi/2, \pi, -\pi/2\}$ between the early and late components, producing the BB84 states $|D\rangle$, $|R\rangle$, $|A\rangle$, $|L\rangle$. Because both components see the same optical path in the same polarization, environmental phase fluctuations cancel, and the Wollaston polarizer doubles as a final reject filter with $10^{6}$ extinction, so polarization misalignment inside the loop costs transmission rather than error. The authors demonstrate a mean QBER of 0.69(2)% over a pseudorandom 16-bit sequence (0.96(1)% in the X-basis, 0.43(2)% in the Y-basis) at a system rate of 151.894 MHz, an encoding agreement of 96.5(2)% with the theoretical states, and a 60-hour output stability with average polarization error $4\times10^{-5}$ without active stabilization, and they state this is the lowest QBER reported to date for high-speed information encoding on single photons.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the reported 0.69% QBER reflects the encoder's intrinsic error floor rather than favorable measurement conditions, since the value was computed from just one minute of data after manually optimizing a fiber polarization controller and applying a 2.65 ns temporal filter that discards about 10% of events, while the 60-hour stability demonstration used a laser and polarimeter directly after the loop rather than single photons through the full encoder-fiber-decoder chain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A real BB84 link built on this module could run at roughly a quarter of the error rate used as the lower bound of published single-photon encoding experiments (2.50%), and the paper's simulation shows that improving QBER from 2.50% to 0.69% raises the asymptotic secure key rate by more than 19% at every distance and adds 0.63 dB of tolerable channel loss.
  • The encoder operates at 151.894 MHz with a total module loss of 5.17(5) dB, and the paper estimates that replacing the fiber-based circulator with a free-space version would recover about 2 dB of that loss.
  • The architecture is reversible: operating it as an active single-photon decoder would enable QKD protocols with asymmetric basis choice, as the paper notes.
  • With minor modifications the same Sagnac design can implement phase and time-bin encoding, and all components have integrated-photonics counterparts, making the demonstrated performance a step toward on-chip encoders.
  • The 60-hour stability record shows flicker-dominated noise with no strong spectral lines, so the module needs no active thermal or mechanical stabilization under ordinary laboratory conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 60-hour stability test measured the loop alone with a laser and polarimeter, while the 0.69% QBER was a one-minute single-photon run through the connection fiber and decoder after manual optimization of a fiber polarization controller; the natural confirmation test, which the paper suggests but does not perform, is to run the full chain for hours with automated feedback and watch the QBER cont
  • Because the temporal filter keeps only photons inside a 2.65 ns window and rejects roughly 10% of events, the demonstrated error rate is tied to the fast ~1 ns decay of this particular quantum dot; a slower or jitterier emitter would blur the boundary between early and late components and raise the error rate, so part of the record is a source property, not purely an encoder property.
  • The paper acknowledges, citing the temporal side-channel study of Sagnac QKD encoders, that timing information can leak information; turning the 0.69% encoding error into a certified secure key rate would require quantifying that leakage for this specific module, which the paper does not attempt.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a free-space Sagnac interferometer (FSSI) based BB84 polarization encoder for single photons from an InGaAs quantum dot emitting at 1560.4 nm. The encoder operates at 151.894 MHz and is claimed to achieve a quantum bit error rate (QBER) of 0.69(2)% and an encoding agreement of 96.5(2)% from one minute of accumulated data with a 2.65 ns temporal filter. The paper also reports a 60-hour polarization stability measurement performed with a CW laser and a polarimeter, and presents an asymptotic secret-key-rate simulation using the measured QBER as an input. The authors explicitly acknowledge the one-minute accumulation, the manual fiber polarization controller optimization, the temporal filtering, and the potential for temporal side-channel leakage.

Significance. If substantiated, a 0.69% QBER at 152 MHz would be a notable result for high-speed single-photon encoding, and the FSSI approach is an interesting way to obtain phase-stable polarization modulation. The manuscript is careful in several respects: it provides a detailed loss budget, openly describes the measurement limitations, discloses the temporal side-channel risk, and presents the SKR as a simulation rather than as a measured rate. However, the headline comparative claims are not fully supported in the current version: Table 2 omits Ref. [45], which the text identifies as the first Sagnac-based SPS encoding experiment, and the encoding-agreement calculation appears to use an unnormalized theoretical state vector. Both issues bear directly on the two headline quantitative claims and require revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table 2 / Abstract] The claim that 0.69% is the lowest error rate reported to date for high-speed information encoding on single photons is not established, because Table 2 omits Ref. [45], which Sec. 1 identifies as the first Sagnac-based SPS encoding experiment. Since Ref. [45] is a directly relevant SPS polarization-encoding demonstration, its QBER and repetition rate must be included in the comparison or the exclusion must be explicitly justified; without that, the superlative claim is unsupported.
  2. [Methods, Eq. (8)-(9)] The theoretical state vector in Eq. (8), |D⟩_theo = √(3/2)·(1, 0, 1/2, 1/2), is not normalized (its norm is 1.5), despite the text stating that normalized theoretically expected state vectors are used. Since the encoding agreement in Eq. (9) is computed from the Frobenius distance between M_exp and M_theo, the normalization of the theoretical matrix directly affects the reported 96.5(2)% value. The authors should correct the formula or clearly define the intended normalization and recompute the agreement accordingly.
  3. [Sec. 4.2 / Fig. 4] The 60-hour stability measurement is performed with a CW laser, with the phase modulator inactive, and with a polarimeter placed directly after the Sagnac loop, rather than with encoded single photons through the full encoder-fiber-decoder chain. As the authors acknowledge, this isolates encoder stability from fiber-induced fluctuations, but it does not directly demonstrate that the dynamic single-photon QBER of 0.69% persists over 60 hours. The 'ultrastable' title claim should be qualified accordingly, or a long-term single-photon QBER measurement should be provided.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] The one-minute accumulation and manual FPC optimization mean the reported QBER is an instantaneous, optimized value; adding a footnote to Table 2 indicating this would help readers compare this work with other experiments on equal footing.
  2. [Methods, Eq. (13)] Equation (13) appears to have a missing closing parenthesis in the denominator; please check and correct the formula.
  3. [Conclusion] The phrase 'best results reported at present regarding dynamic information inscription onto single photons' is broader than what is currently demonstrated; consider restricting the claim to the specific encoder type or completing the comparison table first.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the QBER, encoding agreement, and stability figures are direct measurements, and the SKR simulation is an explicit simulation using the measured QBER as an input.

full rationale

The paper's central results are direct experimental measurements rather than derived predictions. The QBER is computed from integrated detector counts per time slot via Eq. 6, with no parameter fitted to the reported output; the encoding agreement is a comparison between measured state vectors and theoretically expected BB84 states; and the 60-hour stability is a polarimeter measurement of the output Stokes vector. The SKR simulation in Fig. 3c is explicitly labeled a simulation and uses the measured QBER as an input parameter, so it is not a disguised prediction. The reuse of the decoder design and SKR formula from the authors' prior work [36] is methodological reuse and is not load-bearing for the measured values: even if that prior work were disregarded, the QBER and stability measurements would stand on their own. The comparison claim of 'lowest error rate reported to date' is a completeness concern because Ref. [45], cited as the first Sagnac-based SPS encoding experiment, is absent from Table 2; however, an incomplete comparison is a correctness issue, not circularity. The acknowledged caveats about temporal filtering and the CW-laser-based stability measurement also affect interpretation and generalizability, but they do not make the derivation circular. No step in the paper reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result is an experimental measurement, so the ledger is short. One hand-chosen analysis parameter, the temporal filter, enters the reported QBER. Three domain assumptions underpin the stability and low-error claims: common-mode cancellation in the Sagnac loop, transfer of CW laser stability to single-photon operation, and unbiased temporal filtering. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Temporal filtering window = 2.65 ns within each 6.6 ns time slot
    Chosen by hand to discard ambiguous events; rejects roughly 10% of detected photons and directly determines the reported QBER and encoding agreement (Sec. 4.1 and Methods).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Sagnac common-mode phase cancellation holds because both CW and CCW photons traverse the phase modulator in the same polarization, so environmental phase noise is equal in both directions and cancels.
    Invoked in Sec. 3.1 to justify the 'inherently phase stable' claim; relies on the polarization alignment to the slow axis being good enough that both directions see the same crystal axes.
  • domain assumption The 60-hour CW laser polarimeter measurement is a valid proxy for the encoder's stability under single-photon operation.
    Sec. 4.2 measures stability with a laser and a polarimeter, while the QBER is measured with single photons for one minute; the transfer is asserted, not demonstrated.
  • domain assumption Temporal filtering does not bias the QBER estimate, i.e., the discarded ~10% of events have the same error statistics as the kept ones.
    Needed for the reported 0.69% QBER to represent all encoded photons; the paper does not compare filtered and unfiltered error rates (Sec. 4.1 and Methods).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrastable, low-error dynamic polarization encoding of deterministically generated single photons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QJCOGFAM

@misc{pith2026250716578,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrastable, low-error dynamic polarization encoding of deterministically generated single photons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QJCOGFAM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16578}
}
read the original abstract

The ability to inscribe information on single photons at high speeds is a crucial requirement for quantum applications such as quantum communication and measurement-based photonic quantum computation. Nowadays, most experimental implementations employ phase modulators in single-pass, Mach-Zehnder interferometer or Michelson interferometer configurations to encode information on photonic qubits. However, these approaches are intrinsically sensitive to environmental influences, limiting the achievable quantum error rates in practice. We report on the first demonstration of a polarization encoder for single-photon qubits based on a free-space Sagnac interferometer, showcasing inherent phase stability and overcoming previous error rate limitations. Telecom-wavelength single photons emitted by a quantum dot are modulated by the encoder under a repetition rate of 152 MHz. A quantum bit error rate of 0.69(2)% is achieved, marking the lowest error rate reported to date for high-speed information encoding on single photons. This work represents a key advance towards robust, scalable, and low-error quantum information processing with single photon sources.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [45]

    National Science Review 12(8), 147 (2025)

    Xingjian, Z., Haoran, Z., Chua, R.M., Eng, J., Meunier, M., Grieve, J.A., Weibo, G., Ling, A.: Polarization-encoded quantum key distribution with a room-temperature telecom single-photon emitter. National Science Review 12(8), 147 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    Physical Review A73(1), 012334 (2006)

    Spedalieri, F.M., Lee, H., Dowling, J.P.: High- fidelity linear optical quantum computing with polarization encoding. Physical Review A73(1), 012334 (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [2]

    Sci- ence 318(5856), 1567–1570 (2007) 9

    O’Brien, J.L.: Optical Quantum Computing. Sci- ence 318(5856), 1567–1570 (2007) 9

    work page 2007

  4. [3]

    Theoretical Computer Science 560, 7–11 (2014)

    Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G.: Quantum cryptog- raphy: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Theoretical Computer Science 560, 7–11 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [4]

    Physical Review Letters 108(13), 130503 (2012)

    Lo, H.-K., Curty, M., Qi, B.: Measurement- Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribu- tion. Physical Review Letters 108(13), 130503 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [5]

    In: Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Com- puter Science, pp

    Brassard, G., Crepeau, C., Jozsa, R., Langlois, D.: A quantum bit commitment scheme provably unbreakable by both parties. In: Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Com- puter Science, pp. 362–371 (1993)

    work page 1993

  7. [6]

    Physical Review Letters109(13), 130501 (2012)

    Kent, A.: Unconditionally Secure Bit Com- mitment by Transmitting Measurement Out- comes. Physical Review Letters109(13), 130501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [7]

    Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2008/266 (2008)

    Broadbent, A., Tapp, A.: Information- Theoretically Secure V oting Without an Honest Majority. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2008/266 (2008). https: //eprint.iacr.org/2008/266 Accessed 2025-05-07

    work page 2008

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    Optica 4(2), 172–177 (2017)

    Sibson, P., Kennard, J.E., Stanisic, S., Erven, C., O’Brien, J.L., Thompson, M.G.: Integrated silicon photonics for high-speed quantum key distribution. Optica 4(2), 172–177 (2017)

    2017

  2. [9]

    Applied Physics Let- ters 112(5), 051108 (2018)

    Grünenfelder, F., Boaron, A., Rusca, D., Mar- tin, A., Zbinden, H.: Simple and high-speed polarization-based QKD. Applied Physics Let- ters 112(5), 051108 (2018)

    2018

  3. [10]

    In: 2021 OFC Conference and Exhibition, pp

    Avesani, M., Calderaro, L., Foletto, G., Agnesi, C., Picciariello, F., Santagiustina, F., Scriminich, A., Stanco, A., Vedovato, F., Zahidy, M., Val- lone, G., Villoresi, P.: A resource-effective QKD field-trial in Padua with the iPOGNAC encoder. In: 2021 OFC Conference and Exh...

    2021

  4. [11]

    npj Quantum Informa- tion 7(1), 1–8 (2021)

    Avesani, M., Calderaro, L., Schiavon, M., Stanco, A., Agnesi, C., Santamato, A., Zahidy, M., Scriminich, A., Foletto, G., Contestabile, G., Chiesa, M., Rotta, D., Artiglia, M., Montanaro, A., Romagnoli, M., Sorianello, V ., Vedovato, F., Vallone, G., Villoresi, P.: Full daylig...

    2021

  5. [12]

    Optica 9(7), 812–823 (2022)

    Fan-Yuan, G.-J., Lu, F.-Y ., Wang, S., Yin, Z.- Q., He, D.-Y ., Chen, W., Zhou, Z., Wang, Z.- H., Teng, J., Guo, G.-C., Han, Z.-F.: Robust and adaptable quantum key distribution network without trusted nodes. Optica 9(7), 812–823 (2022)

    2022

  6. [13]

    Nature Photonics 17(5), 416–421 (2023)

    Li, W., Zhang, L., Tan, H., Lu, Y ., Liao, S.-K., Huang, J., Li, H., Wang, Z., Mao, H.-K., Yan, B., Li, Q., Liu, Y ., Zhang, Q., Peng, C.-Z., You, L., Xu, F., Pan, J.-W.: High-rate quantum key distri- bution exceeding 110 Mb s–1. Nature Photonics 17(5), 416–421 (2023)

    2023

  7. [14]

    Applied Physics Letters 91(16), 161103 (2007)

    Intallura, P.M., Ward, M.B., Karimov, O.Z., Yuan, Z.L., See, P., Shields, A.J., Atkinson, P., Ritchie, D.A.: Quantum key distribution using a triggered quantum dot source emitting near 1.3µm. Applied Physics Letters 91(16), 161103 (2007)

    2007

  8. [15]

    Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 11(5), 054005 (2009)

    Intallura, P.M., Ward, M.B., Karimov, O.Z., Yuan, Z.L., See, P., Atkinson, P., Ritchie, D.A., Shields, A.J.: Quantum communication using single photons from a semiconductor quantum dot emitting at a telecommunication wavelength. Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 11(...

    2009

  9. [16]

    Scientific Reports 5(1), 14383 (2015)

    Takemoto, K., Nambu, Y ., Miyazawa, T., Sakuma, Y ., Yamamoto, T., Yorozu, S., Arakawa, Y .: Quantum key distribution over 120 km using ultrahigh purity single-photon source and super- conducting single-photon detectors. Scientific Reports 5(1), 14383 (2015)

    2015

  10. [17]

    Applied Physics Reviews 9(1), 011412 (2022)

    Gao, T., Rickert, L., Urban, F., Große, J., Srocka, N., Rodt, S., Musiał, A., ˙Zołnacz, K., Mergo, P., Dybka, K., Urba ´nczyk, W., Se ¸k, G., Burger, S., Reitzenstein, S., Heindel, T.: A quantum key distribution testbed using a plug&play telecom-wavelength single-photon source...

    2022

  11. [18]

    Advanced Quantum Technolo- gies 5(9), 2200059 (2022)

    Samaner, Ç., Paçal, S., Mutlu, G., Uyanık, K., Ate¸ s, S.: Free-Space Quantum Key Distribution 10 with Single Photons from Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride. Advanced Quantum Technolo- gies 5(9), 2200059 (2022)

    2022

  12. [19]

    Nature Communications 14(1), 3573 (2023)

    Morrison, C.L., Pousa, R.G., Graffitti, F., Koong, Z.X., Barrow, P., Stoltz, N.G., Bouwmeester, D., Jeffers, J., Oi, D.K.L., Gerardot, B.D., Fedrizzi, A.: Single-emitter quantum key distribution over 175 km of fibre with optimised finite key rates. Nature Communications 14(1),...

    2023

  13. [20]

    Advanced Quantum Technolo- gies 6(9), 2300038 (2023)

    Al-Juboori, A., Zeng, H.Z.J., Nguyen, M.A.P., Ai, X., Laucht, A., Solntsev, A., Toth, M., Malaney, R., Aharonovich, I.: Quantum Key Dis- tribution Using a Quantum Emitter in Hexagonal Boron Nitride. Advanced Quantum Technolo- gies 6(9), 2300038 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    npj Quantum Information 10(1), 1–6 (2024)

    Zahidy, M., Mikkelsen, M.T., Müller, R., Da Lio, B., Krehbiel, M., Wang, Y ., Bart, N., Wieck, A.D., Ludwig, A., Galili, M., Forchhammer, S., Lodahl, P., Oxenløwe, L.K., Bacco, D., Midolo, L.: Quantum key distribution using determinis- tic single-photon sources over a field-in...

    2024

  15. [22]

    Nature 453(7198), 1023–1030 (2008)

    Kimble, H.J.: The quantum internet. Nature 453(7198), 1023–1030 (2008)

    2008

  16. [23]

    Science 362(6412), 9288 (2018)

    Wehner, S., Elkouss, D., Hanson, R.: Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead. Science 362(6412), 9288 (2018)

    2018

  17. [24]

    Physical Review Letters 123(16), 160502 (2019)

    Zopf, M., Keil, R., Chen, Y ., Yang, J., Chen, D., Ding, F., Schmidt, O.G.: Entanglement Swapping with Semiconductor-Generated Pho- tons Violates Bell’s Inequality. Physical Review Letters 123(16), 160502 (2019)

    2019

  18. [25]

    Phys- ical Review Letters 123(16), 160501 (2019)

    Basso Basset, F., Rota, M.B., Schimpf, C., Tedeschi, D., Zeuner, K.D., Covre da Silva, S.F., Reindl, M., Zwiller, V ., Jöns, K.D., Rastelli, A., Trotta, R.: Entanglement Swapping with Photons Generated on Demand by a Quantum Dot. Phys- ical Review Letters 123(16), 160501 (2019)

    2019

  19. [26]

    Advanced Quantum Technologies 3(11), 1900141 (2020)

    van Loock, P., Alt, W., Becher, C., Benson, O., Boche, H., Deppe, C., Eschner, J., Höfling, S., Meschede, D., Michler, P., Schmidt, F., Wein- furter, H.: Extending Quantum Links: Mod- ules for Fiber- and Memory-Based Quantum Repeaters. Advanced Quantum Technologies 3(11), 1900...

    2020

  20. [27]

    PhD thesis, University of Calgary (October 2021)

    Owen, K.A.: Towards MDI QKD using Quan- tum Dot Single Photon Sources. PhD thesis, University of Calgary (October 2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    Scientific Reports 8(1), 4115 (2018)

    Zhou, Y .-H., Yu, Z.-W., Li, A., Hu, X.-L., Jiang, C., Wang, X.-B.: Measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution via quan- tum blockade. Scientific Reports 8(1), 4115 (2018)

    2018

  22. [29]

    Physical Review Letters 134(21), 210801 (2025)

    Zhang, Y ., Ding, X., Li, Y ., Zhang, L., Guo, Y .-P., Wang, G.-Q., Ning, Z., Xu, M.-C., Liu, R.-Z., Zhao, J.-Y ., Zou, G.-Y ., Wang, H., Cao, Y ., He, Y .-M., Peng, C.-Z., Huo, Y .-H., Liao, S.- K., Lu, C.-Y ., Xu, F., Pan, J.-W.: Experimental Single-Photon Quantum Key Distri...

    2025

  23. [30]

    Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv

    Vajner, D.A., Kaymazlar, K., Drauschke, F., Rickert, L., Helversen, M., Liu, H., Li, S., Ni, H., Niu, Z., Pappa, A., Heindel, T.: Single-Photon Advantage in Quantum Cryptography Beyond QKD. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2412.14993 (2024)

    2024 doi

  24. [31]

    npj Quantum Infor- mation 8(1), 104 (2022)

    Bozzio, M., Vyvlecka, M., Cosacchi, M., Nawrath, C., Seidelmann, T., Loredo, J.C., Por- talupi, S.L., Axt, V .M., Michler, P., Walther, P.: Enhancing quantum cryptography with quantum dot single-photon sources. npj Quantum Infor- mation 8(1), 104 (2022)

    2022

  25. [32]

    Advanced Quantum Technologies 6(11), 2300111 (2023)

    Nawrath, C., Joos, R., Kolatschek, S., Bauer, S., Pruy, P., Hornung, F., Fischer, J., Huang, J., Vijayan, P., Sittig, R., Jetter, M., Portalupi, S.L., Michler, P.: Bright Source of Purcell-Enhanced, Triggered, Single Photons in the Telecom C- Band. Advanced Quantum Technologie...

    2023

  26. [33]

    Applied Physics Letters 112(9), 093106 (2018) 11

    Schweickert, L., Jöns, K.D., Zeuner, K.D., Covre da Silva, S.F., Huang, H., Lettner, T., Reindl, M., Zichi, J., Trotta, R., Rastelli, A., Zwiller, V .: On-demand generation of background-free sin- gle photons from a solid-state source. Applied Physics Letters 112(9), 093106 (2018) 11

    2018

  27. [34]

    Physical Review B 100(15), 155420 (2019)

    Reindl, M., Weber, J.H., Huber, D., Schimpf, C., Covre da Silva, S.F., Portalupi, S.L., Trotta, R., Michler, P., Rastelli, A.: Highly indistinguish- able single photons from incoherently excited quantum dots. Physical Review B 100(15), 155420 (2019)

    2019

  28. [35]

    Nature Nanotechnology 16(4), 399–403 (2021)

    Tomm, N., Javadi, A., Antoniadis, N.O., Najer, D., Löbl, M.C., Korsch, A.R., Schott, R., Valentin, S.R., Wieck, A.D., Ludwig, A., War- burton, R.J.: A bright and fast source of coherent single photons. Nature Nanotechnology 16(4), 399–403 (2021)

    2021

  29. [36]

    Light: Science & Applications13(1), 150 (2024)

    Yang, J., Jiang, Z., Benthin, F., Hanel, J., Fan- drich, T., Joos, R., Bauer, S., Kolatschek, S., Hreibi, A., Rugeramigabo, E.P., Jetter, M., Por- talupi, S.L., Zopf, M., Michler, P., Kück, S., Ding, F.: High-rate intercity quantum key dis- tribution with a semiconductor singl...

    2024

  30. [37]

    Optics Letters 43(9), 2030–2033 (2018)

    Wang, S., Chen, W., Yin, Z.-Q., He, D.-Y ., Hui, C., Hao, P.-L., Fan-Yuan, G.-J., Wang, C., Zhang, L.-J., Kuang, J., Liu, S.-F., Zhou, Z., Wang, Y .-G., Guo, G.-C., Han, Z.-F.: Practi- cal gigahertz quantum key distribution robust against channel disturbance. Optics Letters 43...

    2018

  31. [38]

    Optics Letters 44(21), 5262–5265 (2019)

    Li, Y ., Li, Y .-H., Xie, H.-B., Li, Z.-P., Jiang, X., Cai, W.-Q., Ren, J.-G., Yin, J., Liao, S.-K., Peng, C.-Z.: High-speed robust polarization modula- tion for quantum key distribution. Optics Letters 44(21), 5262–5265 (2019)

    2019

  32. [39]

    Optics Letters 44(10), 2398–2401 (2019)

    Agnesi, C., Avesani, M., Stanco, A., Villoresi, P., Vallone, G.: All-fiber self-compensating polar- ization encoder for quantum key distribution. Optics Letters 44(10), 2398–2401 (2019)

    2019

  33. [40]

    Optics Letters 45(17), 4706– 4709 (2020)

    Avesani, M., Agnesi, C., Stanco, A., Vallone, G., Villoresi, P.: Stable, low-error, and calibration- free polarization encoder for free-space quantum communication. Optics Letters 45(17), 4706– 4709 (2020)

    2020

  34. [41]

    Optica 5(8), 902–909 (2018)

    Liu, H., Wang, J., Ma, H., Sun, S.: Polarization-multiplexing-based measurement- device-independent quantum key distribution without phase reference calibration. Optica 5(8), 902–909 (2018)

    2018

  35. [42]

    Nature 589(7841), 214–219 (2021)

    Chen, Y .-A., Zhang, Q., Chen, T.-Y ., Cai, W.-Q., Liao, S.-K., Zhang, J., Chen, K., Yin, J., Ren, J.- G., Chen, Z., Han, S.-L., Yu, Q., Liang, K., Zhou, F., Yuan, X., Zhao, M.-S., Wang, T.-Y ., Jiang, X., Zhang, L., Liu, W.-Y ., Li, Y ., Shen, Q., Cao, Y ., Lu, C.-Y ., Shu, R...

    2021

  36. [43]

    Optics Let- ters 46(9), 2152–2155 (2021)

    Ma, D., Liu, X., Huang, C., Chen, H., Lin, H., Wei, K.: Simple quantum key distribution using a stable transmitter-receiver scheme. Optics Let- ters 46(9), 2152–2155 (2021)

    2021

  37. [44]

    Optics Express 31(16), 26335–26343 (2023)

    Tang, Y .-L., Zhou, C., Li, D.-D., Xie, Z.-L., Xu, M.-L., Sun, J., Zhang, Z.-X., Jiang, L.-J., Wang, L.-W., Liu, G.-Q., Wu, K., Ma, Y ., Zheng, B.- R., Jiang, M.-S., Wang, Y ., Zhao, Y .-K., Ma, Q.-L., Zhang, D., Zhao, M.-S., Bao, W.-S., Tang, S.-B.: Time-bin phase-encoding qu...

    2023

  38. [46]

    Nature 178(4541), 1046–1048 (1956)

    Hanbury Brown, R., Twiss, R.Q.: A Test of a New Type of Stellar Interferometer on Sirius. Nature 178(4541), 1046–1048 (1956)

    1956

  39. [47]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 60(2), 537–571 (1988)

    Weissman, M.B.: 1/f noise and other slow, nonexponential kinetics in condensed matter. Reviews of Modern Physics 60(2), 537–571 (1988)

    1988

  40. [48]

    In: International Sym- posium onInformation Theory, 2004

    Gottesman, D., Lo, H.-K., Lutkenhaus, N., Preskill, J.: Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices. In: International Sym- posium onInformation Theory, 2004. ISIT 2004. Proceedings., p. 136 (2004). https://doi.org/10. 1109/ISIT.2004.1365172

    2004 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Physical Review A 111(4), 042622 (2025)

    Tan, H., Zhang, W., Han, L., Liao, S.-K., Xu, 12 F.: Experimental study of time-dependent side channels in quantum key distribution. Physical Review A 111(4), 042622 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    Optics Letters 39(4), 965–968 (2014)

    Su, Z., Timurdogan, E., Hosseini, E.S., Sun, J., Leake, G., Coolbaugh, D.D., Watts, M.R.: Four- port integrated polarizing beam splitter. Optics Letters 39(4), 965–968 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    Journal of Cryp- tology 18(2), 133–165 (2005)

    Lo, H.-K., Chau, H.F., Ardehali, M.: Efficient Quantum Key Distribution Scheme and a Proof of Its Unconditional Security. Journal of Cryp- tology 18(2), 133–165 (2005)

    2005

  44. [52]

    Nature 420(6917), 762–762 (2002)

    Waks, E., Inoue, K., Santori, C., Fattal, D., Vuck- ovic, J., Solomon, G.S., Yamamoto, Y .: Quantum cryptography with a photon turnstile. Nature 420(6917), 762–762 (2002)

    2002

  45. [53]

    Journal of Applied Physics 107(7), 073102 (2010)

    Collins„ R.J., Clarke, P.J., Fernández, V ., Gor- don, K.J., Makhonin, M.N., Timpson, J.A., Tahraoui, A., Hopkinson, M., Fox, A.M., Skol- nick, M.S., Buller, G.S.: Quantum Key Distri- bution System in Standard Telecommunications Fiber Using a Short Wavelength Single Pho- ton S...

    2010

  46. [54]

    New Journal of Physics 14(8), 083001 (2012) 13

    Heindel, T., Kessler, C.A., Rau, M., Schneider, C., Fürst, M., Hargart, F., Schulz, W.-M., Eich- felder, M., Roßbach, R., Nauerth, S., Lermer, M., Weier, H., Jetter, M., Kamp, M., Reitzenstein, S., Höfling, S., Michler, P., Weinfurter, H., Forchel, A.: Quantum key distribution...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.