Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

AURA: A Multi-Modal Medical Agent for Understanding, Reasoning & Annotation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.16940 v1 pith:AZANKSBD submitted 2025-07-22 cs.CV cs.LGcs.MA

AURA: A Multi-Modal Medical Agent for Understanding, Reasoning & Annotation

classification cs.CV cs.LGcs.MA
keywords auramedicalagenticanalysisreasoningsegmentationsystemsagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have catalyzed a paradigm shift from static prediction systems to agentic AI agents capable of reasoning, interacting with tools, and adapting to complex tasks. While LLM-based agentic systems have shown promise across many domains, their application to medical imaging remains in its infancy. In this work, we introduce AURA, the first visual linguistic explainability agent designed specifically for comprehensive analysis, explanation, and evaluation of medical images. By enabling dynamic interactions, contextual explanations, and hypothesis testing, AURA represents a significant advancement toward more transparent, adaptable, and clinically aligned AI systems. We highlight the promise of agentic AI in transforming medical image analysis from static predictions to interactive decision support. Leveraging Qwen-32B, an LLM-based architecture, AURA integrates a modular toolbox comprising: (i) a segmentation suite with phase grounding, pathology segmentation, and anatomy segmentation to localize clinically meaningful regions; (ii) a counterfactual image-generation module that supports reasoning through image-level explanations; and (iii) a set of evaluation tools including pixel-wise difference-map analysis, classification, and advanced state-of-the-art components to assess diagnostic relevance and visual interpretability.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Aligning Clinical Needs and AI Capabilities: A Survey on LLMs for Medical Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    A dual clinical-computational taxonomy for medical LLM reasoning plus a five-level 5k-sample benchmark showing specialists excel at diagnosis and general models at decision support/dialogue.

  2. GAZE: Grounded Agentic Zero-shot Evaluation with Viewer-Level Tools and Literature Retrieval on Rare Brain MRI

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GAZE framework with viewer tools and literature retrieval achieves 58.2 mAP@0.3 lesion localization and 34.9% top-1 diagnostic accuracy on 906 rare brain MRI cases in zero-shot setting, with larger gains on rarest pat...

  3. NeuroAgent: LLM Agents for Multimodal Neuroimaging Analysis and Research

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    NeuroAgent uses a hierarchical LLM agent framework with Generate-Execute-Validate loops to automate neuroimaging preprocessing, reaching 84.8% end-to-end correctness and 0.9518 AUC for Alzheimer's classification on 14...