Three-flavor neutrino oscillations using the Phase Space Approach

Angel Bauge; Denis Lacroix; Mariane Mangin-Brinet

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Three-flavor neutrino oscillations using the Phase Space Approach

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a stochastic phase-space method reproduces exact three-flavor neutrino oscillation dynamics for small systems and scales to 300 neutrinos.

desk verdict A solid extension of the Phase-Space Approximation to three-flavor neutrinos with honest small-N benchmarks, but the N=300 scalability claim is unvalidated and needs referee pressure. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18482 v1 pith:Z5PURUE5 submitted 2025-07-24 hep-ph astro-ph.HEnucl-thquant-ph

Mariane Mangin-Brinet , Angel Bauge , Denis Lacroix This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phastro-ph.HEnucl-thquant-ph

keywords three-flavorneutrinooscillationsphase-spaceapproximationcollectivemean-fieldtrajectoriessingle-neutrinoentropyflavorequilibrationSU(3)polarizationdynamicsscalableclassicalsimulation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends the Phase-Space Approximation, a stochastic method that replaces a quantum many-body problem with many independent mean-field trajectories, from two-flavor to three-flavor neutrino oscillations with neutrino–neutrino interactions. It claims that this approximate method reproduces the exact flavor-population dynamics and single-neutrino entropy growth for systems of six and eight neutrinos, where exact diagonalization is possible. Because each trajectory is independent and the numerical cost scales linearly with the number of neutrinos, the method can simulate systems with up to 300 neutrinos on a standard computer. A sympathetic reader would care because it offers a scalable classical route to collective three-flavor oscillation physics that is otherwise confined to about ten particles.

What carries the argument

The central object is each neutrino's eight-component polarization vector $\vec P^{(\alpha)}=2\langle \vec Q^{(\alpha)}\rangle$, built from the SU(3) Gell-Mann generators. Along each PSA trajectory the mean-field equations reduce to $d\vec P^{(\alpha)}/dt = \vec B \times \vec P^{(\alpha)} + \frac{1}{2}\sum_{\beta\neq\alpha}\mu_{\alpha\beta}\vec P^{(\beta)}\times \vec P^{(\alpha)}$, where the cross product uses the SU(3) structure constants. The crucial supplement is the initial sampling: for a Slater-determinant flavor state, Wick's theorem fixes the variances of the off-diagonal one-body density fluctuations, which are drawn as independent Gaussian random variables in the two-by-two blocks connecting occupied and empty flavor states and are then converted into fluctuating initial polarizations. Averaging many such trajectories reproduces the first and second moments of one-body observables and is what allows the method to capture damping and entropy production that single mean-field trajectories miss.

What would settle it

Run the exact evolution for N=9 or N=10 neutrinos with the same Hamiltonian, parameters, and periodic flavor initial state, and compare exact flavor populations and single-neutrino entropies against PSA; if the discrepancies grow with N or with time beyond the N=6 and N=8 benchmarks, the extrapolation to 300 neutrinos is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the Phase-Space Approximation, extended to the SU(3) polarization algebra, quantitatively captures three-flavor collective neutrino oscillations. For N=6 and N=8, the sampled mean-field trajectories reproduce exact flavor transition probabilities, including the damping of oscillations and the eventual approach to a 1/3 flavor equipartition; they also reproduce the growth and saturation of the single-neutrino entropy. The paper further shows that plain mean-field evolution fails on the same benchmarks, so the stochastic sampling of initial quantum fluctuations, rather than the mean-field equations alone, is what restores the dissipative physics. With that validation in hand, it demonstrates simulations of up to 300 neutrinos and reports that larger N gives faster flavor equilibration and entropy approaching ln(3).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that at t=0 the quantum spread of each neutrino's polarization is fully described by independent Gaussian random variables in the blocks connecting occupied to empty flavor states, with variances from Wick's theorem; if correlations beyond those Gaussians grow with time or with neutrino number, the demonstrated agreement for N=6 and N=8 need not carry over to N=300.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Three-flavor collective neutrino oscillations can be simulated classically for hundreds of neutrinos, where exact methods stop at roughly ten.
The method captures oscillation damping and flavor equilibration that plain mean-field evolution misses, including the asymptotic 1/3 flavor equipartition.
Because the numerical cost is linear in N and trajectories are independent, the approach parallelizes naturally and runs on standard computing hardware.
The same trajectory sampling can be applied to correlated or thermal initial states and to time-dependent Hamiltonians, not only the constant-coupling pure-state cases benchmarked here.
PSA provides a classical benchmark that future quantum simulations of three-flavor neutrino oscillations can be checked against.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the validation at N=9 or N=10 holds, the large-N simulations suggest that in this Hamiltonian a single neutrino decoheres as if embedded in a bath, even though the total system evolves unitarily; this mapping to impurity-model physics could be tested by computing two-neutrino mutual information in exact small-N runs.
The Gaussian sampling ansatz implies a specific and testable prediction: connected four-point correlations between neutrino polarizations remain negligible; an exact small-N calculation of those correlations would delineate the approximation's domain of validity.
Because the PSA equations are Hamiltonian-independent, the same code can be applied directly to time-dependent couplings and to neutrino–matter interactions, offering a practical path toward MSW-inclusive large-N simulations without further algorithmic changes.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

The thing to know: this is a clean, honest extension of the Phase-Space Approximation from two-flavor to three-flavor neutrinos. The SU(3) mean-field equations and the Gaussian initial sampling are derived properly, and the small-system benchmarks against exact diagonalization look genuinely good. The weak point is exactly where the abstract makes its biggest claim: nothing checks the N=300 simulations.

What is new: the eight-component polarization equations (Eq. 5), the Wick-theorem-based sampling of particle-hole fluctuations for three flavors (Eqs. 15–16), and the explicit sampling prescriptions for the three initial flavor states. This is a real step beyond the earlier two-flavor PSA papers. They also show that plain mean-field fails while PSA captures damping and single-neutrino entropy saturation, which is the right thing to demonstrate.

The validation is real but narrow. Only two product initial states, N=6 and N=8. The N=8 curves deviate for t > 100 μ⁻¹, and although they say PSA closely tracks the exact dynamics, the deviation is not quantified. For the large-N runs (up to 300), there is no independent benchmark, no comparison against another approximate method, and no displayed statistical error bars on Figs. 5–7. The N-scaling fit is openly ambiguous (sqrt N and ln N both work), so the scaling conclusion is not a result. The stress-test concern lands: the Gaussian sampling only matches first and second moments at t=0, so error growth with N or time is uncontrolled.

That said, the paper is careful in important ways. No fitted parameters. The Hamiltonian and parameters come from Turro et al. Jackknife error bars are used in the small-N figures. The unrealistic constant-coupling assumption is explicitly flagged. The derivation is detailed enough that a referee can follow it and reproduce the benchmarks.

Who this is for: people working on collective neutrino oscillations, quantum simulation benchmarking, and approximate many-body methods. A referee should push for more extensive validation — more initial states, larger exact benchmarks if feasible, error bars in the large-N plots, and a clearer statement that the N=300 results are illustrative predictions rather than validated outputs.

My recommendation: send to peer review. The core extension is sound and the small-N results are solid; the large-N claims need revision, not rejection.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the Phase-Space Approximation (PSA), previously developed for two-flavor neutrino oscillations, to the three-flavor (SU(3)) case. The authors derive mean-field equations of motion via the Ehrenfest theorem, introduce a Gaussian sampling prescription for initial quantum fluctuations based on Wick's theorem, and validate the method against exact evolution for N=6 and N=8 neutrinos in two specific product initial states, reporting good agreement for flavor populations and single-neutrino entropy. They then present PSA simulations for systems up to N=300 and infer N-dependent equilibration timescales and entropy saturation. The central claims are that PSA accurately reproduces exact quantum dynamics where feasible and enables scalable classical simulation of large neutrino ensembles.

Significance. If the validation and scalability claims hold, the PSA would provide a practically useful classical surrogate for three-flavor collective neutrino oscillations, with a numerical cost linear in the number of neutrinos and natural parallelization. The paper's derivation of the SU(3) mean-field equations and the explicit Wick-theorem-based sampling prescription are clear, and the small-N benchmarks against exact diagonalization are a genuine strength. The comparison of single-neutrino entropy is a useful diagnostic that goes beyond simple population tracking. However, the evidence supporting the large-N extrapolation is incomplete, and the manuscript's strongest claims exceed what is demonstrated.

major comments (3)

[Abstract; Sec. IV.A, Figs. 2-3] The claim that PSA provides 'excellent reproduction' in all cases where the exact solution is feasible is not supported by the evidence, because only N=6 and N=8 are benchmarked, each with a single product initial state, while Sec. II states that exact solutions are feasible up to N=10. In addition, for N=8 the text acknowledges deviations for t > 100 mu^-1 without quantifying them. The authors should either add benchmarks at N=9 and N=10 with additional initial states, or qualify the claim, and should report a quantitative error measure (e.g., maximum or time-averaged L2 deviation) for the N=6 and N=8 cases.
[Sec. IV.C, Figs. 5-7] The large-scale simulations up to N=300 are presented without any Jackknife error bars and without comparison to any independent reference, such as converged exact results for N=9-10, tensor-network results, or convergence checks with respect to the number of PSA trajectories. Because the Gaussian-sampling/mean-field approximation is uncontrolled beyond the two benchmarked small-N cases, the N=300 flavor-equilibration and entropy-saturation curves, as well as the N-scaling inference in Fig. 6, cannot be distinguished from numerical artifacts. The scalability claim in the abstract and conclusion is therefore conditional until such checks are provided.
[Sec. III.B, Eq. (16)] The Gaussian sampling prescription produces one-body density matrices that are almost surely not physical density matrices: for a neutrino initially in |nu_e>, R^(lambda) has diagonal entries (1,0,0) and Gaussian off-diagonal entries, and for any nonzero off-diagonal entry the 2x2 block has a negative eigenvalue. The manuscript neither acknowledges this nor discusses whether the mean-field evolution of such unphysical initial conditions can affect the accuracy at larger N. A short discussion or a numerical test of the positivity violation and its impact on observables is needed to justify the sampling ansatz.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. IV.A, Fig. 2 caption] The caption says the PSA uses 10^4 'Metropolis iterations,' but the sampling in Eq. (16) is direct Gaussian sampling; this should be corrected to 'sampled trajectories' or the relevant sampling procedure should be described consistently.
[Secs. II and III.B] The manuscript should state explicitly whether the PSA evolution is performed in the flavor basis using the rotated one-body Hamiltonian, or in the mass basis after rotating the sampled initial conditions; the text describes both options in Sec. II but does not say which one is used in the results of Figs. 2-4.
[Sec. IV.B] Please clarify that the reported PSA entropy is S(<R>) computed from the ensemble-averaged polarization, not the ensemble average of per-trajectory entropies S(R^(lambda)); because entropy is nonlinear, this distinction should be made explicit.
[References and typos] Reference [29] contains 'Phis. Rev. D' and should be 'Phys. Rev. D'; reference [54] lacks the article title; the abbreviation 'l.h.s.' in the Fig. 1 caption should be spelled out.
[Keywords] The keywords 'quantum computing, quantum algorithms' do not reflect the content; consider keywords such as 'collective neutrino oscillations', 'phase-space approximation', and 'three-flavor oscillations'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PSA three-flavor extension is benchmarked against independent exact diagonalization, contains no fitted parameters, and its large-N simulations are presented as extrapolations rather than as predictions forced by the construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the Phase-Space Approximation reproduces exact three-flavor neutrino dynamics. This is checked, not assumed: the PSA results in Figs. 2-4 are compared directly with exact diagonalization of the same Hamiltonian, with the exact treatment itself validated against the independent results of Ref. [31]. The Gaussian initial sampling in Sec. III.B is derived from Wick's theorem and is designed to match the first and second moments of the initial Slater determinant by construction, but the subsequent time evolution is not fitted to the target observables and no free parameter is adjusted to improve agreement with the exact solutions. The self-citations to earlier PSA work [18,23,37-46] provide context and prior methodology, but the present three-flavor equations of motion and sampling prescription are re-derived in the paper (Eqs. 4-5, 10-16) and then independently benchmarked. The paper's admitted deviations at long times for N=8 (t > 100 mu^-1) and its caution that the constant-interaction asymptotic equilibration may not be realistic are accuracy caveats, not circular reasoning. The extension from N=8 benchmarks to N=300 simulations is an extrapolation whose reliability is not demonstrated, but that is a validation/scalability concern, not a circularity concern: the large-N curves are not fitted to or derived from the small-N outputs. No load-bearing step reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard PSA assumptions: a specific Hamiltonian model, mean-field factorization, Wick-theorem initial fluctuations, and a Gaussian sampling prescription. No new physical entities or fitted parameters are introduced; the neutrino mixing parameters are taken from literature.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The many-body neutrino Hamiltonian of Eq. (1) with constant, all-to-all two-body interactions and equal neutrino energies is an adequate model for collective flavor oscillations.
Used throughout; parameters and Hamiltonian form are taken from Ref. [31]. The authors note the constant interaction is unrealistic but is the benchmark used.
domain assumption Mean-field factorization of two-body expectation values, Eq. (4): <Q_m Q_m'> is approximately <Q_m><Q_m'>, underlies the equations of motion.
Introduced in Section III.A to close the Ehrenfest equations; it is an approximation whose accuracy is tested only through the small-N benchmarks.
standard math Wick's theorem applies to the initial Slater determinant states, giving the fluctuation relations in Eqs. (10)-(11).
Used in Section III.B to compute the variance of one-body density fluctuations; standard for fermionic product states.
ad hoc to paper Independent Gaussian sampling of the nonzero particle-hole density fluctuations with variance 1/4, Eq. (16), faithfully represents the quantum fluctuations required by Eqs. (10)-(11).
This is the PSA sampling prescription; it is not proven to be unique or exact, and its validity beyond the tested cases is the key assumption.
domain assumption The PMNS matrix and oscillation parameters from NuFit (Table I) are correct and applicable to this model.
Inputs from Refs. [47,48]; not derived or tested here.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three-flavor neutrino oscillations using the Phase Space Approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z5PURUE5

@misc{pith2026250718482,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three-flavor neutrino oscillations using the Phase Space Approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z5PURUE5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18482}
}

read the original abstract

The Phase-Space Approximation (PSA) approach, originally applied in [Phys. Rev. D 106, 123006 (2022)] to describe neutrino oscillations from a stellar object in the two-flavor limit, is extended here to describe the more realistic case where neutrinos can oscillate between three different flavors. The approach is successfully validated against the exact solutions up to eight neutrinos. In all cases where the exact solution is feasible, the PSA provides excellent reproduction of the neutrino oscillation dynamics. By replacing the full problem with a set of simple mean-field equations, the PSA offers a versatile, predictive, and easily parallelizable approach for tackling three-flavor problems. This enables the simulation of large-scale neutrino oscillations, as illustrated here with simulations involving up to 300 neutrinos. Additionally, the method provides insight into the system's equilibration properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18482 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** The PSA results are clearly in very good agree [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Improved Approximations for Collective Neutrino Oscillations
hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Second-order BBGKY truncation of an su(n) one-plus-two-body Hamiltonian approximates collective neutrino dynamics beyond mean field at polynomial classical cost and reveals large-N phase and entanglement structure.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Let us consider a generic one-body ob- servable, denoted by O and a system described initially by a many-body density matrix D(0)

General aspect of fluctuations in the PSA For the initial states considered in recent applications, initial quantum fluctuations of one-body observables are easy to compute. Let us consider a generic one-body ob- servable, denoted by O and a system described initially by a many-body density matrix D(0). The mean value and quantum fluctuations of the obser...

work page
[2]

ANR-22-PNQC-0002

Initial fluctuation for the neutrino case In the previous section, we outlined the general philos- ophy of the PSA approach and the prescription for the initial sampling of a generic fermionic system. We now turn to the neutrino oscillation problem, where each neu- trino is labeled by α = 1,··· N. We further focus on the setup commonly considered in recen...

work page
[3]

G. M. Fuller, R. W. Mayle, J. R. Wilson, and D. N. Schramm, Resonant Neutrino Oscillations and Stellar Collapse, Astrophys. J. 322, 795 (1987)

work page 1987
[4]

Notzold and G

D. Notzold and G. Raffelt, Neutrino dispersion at finite temperature and density, Nucl. Phys. B 307, 924 (1988)

work page 1988
[5]

Sigl and G

G. Sigl and G. Raffelt, General kinetic description of rel- ativistic mixed neutrinos, Nucl. Phys. B 406, 423 (1993)

work page 1993
[6]

H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, J. Carlson, and Y.-Z. Qian, Sim- ulation of coherent nonlinear neutrino flavor transforma- tion in the supernova environment: Correlated neutrino trajectories, Phys. Rev. D 74, 105014 (2006)

work page 2006
[7]

A B Balantekin and Y Pehlivan, Neutrino–neutrino in- teractions and flavor mixing in dense matter , J. Phys. G 34, 47 (2007)

work page 2007
[8]

Cristina Volpe, Neutrinos from dense environments: Flavor mechanisms, theoretical approaches, observations, and new directions, Rev

M. Cristina Volpe, Neutrinos from dense environments: Flavor mechanisms, theoretical approaches, observations, and new directions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 025004 (2024)

work page 2024

Show all 58 references

[9]

Pehlivan, A

Y. Pehlivan, A. B. Balantekin, Toshitaka Kajino, and Takashi Yoshida, Invariants of collective neutrino oscil- lations, Phys. Rev. D 84, 065008 (2011)

2011
[10]

Pehlivan, A

Savas Birol, Y. Pehlivan, A. B. Balantekin, and T. Ka- jino, Neutrino spectral split in the exact many-body for- malism, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083002 (2018)

2018
[11]

Patwardhan, Michael J

Amol V. Patwardhan, Michael J. Cervia, and A. Baha Balantekin, Eigenvalues and eigenstates of the many-body collective neutrino oscillation problem , Phys. Rev. D 99, 123013 (2019)

2019
[12]

Ermal Rrapaj, Exact solution of multi-angle quantum many-body collective neutrino flavor oscillations , Phys. Rev. C 101, 065805 (2020)

2020
[13]

Cervia, Amol V

Michael J. Cervia, Amol V. Patwardhan, A.B. Bal- antekin, S.N. Coppersmith, and Calvin W. Johnson, En- 12 tanglement and collective flavor oscillations in a dense neutrino gas, Phys. Rev. D 100, 083001 (2019)

2019
[14]

Patwardhan, Michael J

Amol V. Patwardhan, Michael J. Cervia, and A.B. Bal- antekin, Spectral splits and entanglement entropy in col- lective neutrino oscillations , Phys. Rev. D 104, 123035 (2021)

2021
[15]

Martin, A

Joshua D. Martin, A. Roggero, Huaiyu Duan, J. Carl- son, V. Cirigliano, Classical and Quantum Evolution in a Simple Coherent Neutrino Problem, Phys. Rev. D 105, 083020 (2022)

2022
[16]

Alessandro Roggero, Entanglement and Many-Body ef- fects in Collective Neutrino Oscillations , Phys. Rev. D 104, 103016 (2021)

2021
[17]

Cervia, Pooja Siwach, Amol V

Michael J. Cervia, Pooja Siwach, Amol V. Patwardhan, A. B. Balantekin, S. N. Coppersmith, Calvin W. John- son, Collective neutrino oscillations with tensor networks using a time-dependent variational principle , Phys. Rev. D 105, 123025 (2022)

2022
[18]

Balantekin, Quantum Entanglement and Neutrino Many-Body Systems, J

A.B. Balantekin, Quantum Entanglement and Neutrino Many-Body Systems, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2191, 012004 (2022)

2022
[19]

Zewei Xiong, Many-body effects of collective neutrino os- cillations, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103002 (2022)

2022
[20]

Denis Lacroix, A. B. Balantekin, Michael J. Cervia, Amol V. Patwardhan, and Pooja Siwach, Role of non-Gaussian quantum fluctuations in neutrino entanglement , Phys. Rev. D 106, 123006 (2022)

2022
[21]

Alessandro Roggero, Ermal Rrapaj, and Zewei Xiong, Entanglement and correlations in fast collective neutrino flavor oscillations , Phys. Rev. D 106, 043022 (2022)

2022
[22]

Martin, A

Joshua D. Martin, A. Roggero, Huaiyu Duan, J. Carlson, Many-body neutrino flavor entanglement in a simple dy- namic model , arXiv:2301.07049

arXiv
[23]

Martin, Duff Neill, A

Joshua D. Martin, Duff Neill, A. Roggero, Huaiyu Duan, and J. Carlson, Equilibration of quantum many-body fast neutrino flavor oscillations , Phys. Rev. D 108 , 123010 (2023)

2023
[24]

Savage, Time Scales in Many-Body Fast Neutrino Flavor Con- version, Phys

Ramya Bhaskar, Alessandro Roggero, Martin J. Savage, Time Scales in Many-Body Fast Neutrino Flavor Con- version, Phys. Rev. C 110, 045801 (2024)

2024
[25]

Baha Bal- antekin, Phase-Space methods for neutrino oscillations: extension to multi-beams , Phys

Denis Lacroix, Angel Bauge, Bulent Yilmaz, Mari- ane Mangin-Brinet, Alessandro Roggero, A. Baha Bal- antekin, Phase-Space methods for neutrino oscillations: extension to multi-beams , Phys. Rev. D 110 , 103027 (2024)

2024
[26]

Benjamin Hall, Alessandro Roggero, Alessandro Baroni, and Joseph Carlson, Simulation of collective neutrino os- cillations on a quantum computer , Phys. Rev. D 104 , 063009
[27]

Pooser, Collective neutrino oscillations on a quantum computer , Quantum Inf Process 21, 84 (2022)

K¨ ubra Yeter-Aydeniz, Shikha Bangar, George Siopsis, and Raphael C. Pooser, Collective neutrino oscillations on a quantum computer , Quantum Inf Process 21, 84 (2022)

2022
[28]

Abhishek Kumar Jha and Akshay Chatla, Quantum stud- ies of neutrinos on IBMQ processors, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 231, 141 (2022)

2022
[29]

Savage, Multi-Neutrino Entangle- ment and Correlations in Dense Neutrino Systems, Phys

Marc Illa, Martin J. Savage, Multi-Neutrino Entangle- ment and Correlations in Dense Neutrino Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 221003 (2023)

2023
[30]

Savage, Basic Elements for Sim- ulations of Standard Model Physics with Quantum An- nealers: Multigrid and Clock States , Phys

Marc Illa, Martin J. Savage, Basic Elements for Sim- ulations of Standard Model Physics with Quantum An- nealers: Multigrid and Clock States , Phys. Rev. A 106, 052605 (2022)

2022
[31]

Valentina Amitrano, Alessandro Roggero, Piero Luchi, Francesco Turro, Luca Vespucci, Francesco Pederiva, Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulation of Collective Neutrino Oscillations, Phis. Rev. D 107, 023007 (2023)

2023
[32]

Siwach, K

P. Siwach, K. Harrison, and A. B. Balantekin, Collective neutrino oscillations on a quantum computer with hybrid quantum-classical algorithm, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083039 (2023)

2023
[33]

Chernyshev, Ramya Bhaskar, Marc Illa, Qutrit and Qubit Circuits for Three-Flavor Collective Neutrino Oscillations , Phys

Francesco Turro, Ivan A. Chernyshev, Ramya Bhaskar, Marc Illa, Qutrit and Qubit Circuits for Three-Flavor Collective Neutrino Oscillations , Phys. Rev. D 111 , 043038 (2025)

2025
[34]

I. A. Chernyshev, Three-flavor collective neutrino oscil- lation simulations on a qubit quantum annealer , Phys. Rev. D 111, 043017 (2025)

2025
[35]

Cervia, Amol V

Luca Spagnoli, Noah Goss, Alessandro Roggero, Ermal Rrapaj, Michael J. Cervia, Amol V. Patwardhan, Ravi K. Naik, A. Baha Balantekin, Ed Younis, David I. San- tiago, Irfan Siddiqi, Sheakha Aldaihan, Collective Neu- trino Oscillations in Three Flavors on Qubit and Qutrit Process...

2025
[36]

Suliga, A

Pooja Siwach, Anna M. Suliga, A. Baha Balantekin , En- tanglement in three-flavor collective neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 107, 023019 (2023)

2023
[37]

Baha Balantekin, Amol V

Pooja Siwach, A. Baha Balantekin, Amol V. Patward- han, Anna M. Suliga, Exploring entanglement and spec- tral split correlations in three-flavor collective neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 111, 063038 (2025)

2025
[38]

Ivan Chernyshev, Caroline E. P. Robin, Martin J. Savage, Quantum Magic and Computational Complexity in the Neutrino Sector, Phys. Rev. Research 7, 023228 (2025)

2025
[39]

Ayik, A stochastic mean-field approach for nuclear dy- namics, Phys

S. Ayik, A stochastic mean-field approach for nuclear dy- namics, Phys. Lett. B 658, 174 (2008)

2008
[40]

Denis Lacroix, Sakir Ayik, and Bulent Yilmaz, Symme- try breaking and fluctuations within stochastic mean-field dynamics: Importance of initial quantum fluctuations , Phys. Rev. C 85, 041602(R) (2012)

2012
[41]

Denis Lacroix, Danilo Gambacurta, and Sakir Ayik, Quantal corrections to mean-field dynamics including pairing, Phys. Rev. C 87, 061302(R) (2013)

2013
[42]

Lacroix and S

D. Lacroix and S. Ayik, Stochastic quantum dynamics beyond mean field, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 95 (2014)

2014
[43]

Bulent Yilmaz, Denis Lacroix, and Resul Curebal, Im- portance of realistic phase-space representations of ini- tial quantum fluctuations using the stochastic mean-field approach for fermions, Phys. Rev. C 90, 054617 (2014)

2014
[44]

Hermanns, C

Denis Lacroix, S. Hermanns, C. M. Hinz, and M. Bonitz, Ultrafast dynamics of finite Hubbard clusters: A stochas- tic mean-field approach, Phys. Rev. B 90, 125112 (2014)

2014
[45]

Lacroix, Y

D. Lacroix, Y. Tanimura, S. Ayik, B. Yilmaz, A sim- plified BBGKY hierarchy for correlated fermions from a stochastic mean-field approach Eur. Phys. J. A 52 , 94 (2016)

2016
[46]

Ibrahim Ulgen, Bulent Yilmaz, and Denis Lacroix, Im- pact of initial fluctuations on the dissipative dynamics of interacting Fermi systems: A model case study , Phys. Rev. C 100, 054603 (2019)

2019
[47]

David Regnier, Denis Lacroix, Guillaume Scamps, and Yukio Hashimoto, Microscopic description of pair trans- fer between two superfluid Fermi systems: Combin- ing phase-space averaging and combinatorial techniques , Phys. Rev. C 97, 034627 (2018)

2018
[48]

Thomas Czuba, Denis Lacroix, David Regnier, Ibrahim Ulgen and Bulent Yilmaz, Combining phase-space and time-dependent reduced density matrix approach to de- 13 scribe the dynamics of interacting fermions , Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 111 (2020)

2020
[49]

Esteban, M

I. Esteban, M. C. Gonz´ alez-Garc´ ıa, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, and A. Zhou, The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations , JHEP 09, 178, arXiv:2007.14792 [hep-ph]

2007 arXiv
[50]

Nufit 5.3, www.nu-fit.org (2024)

2024
[51]

Basudeb Dasgupta and Amol Dighe, Collective three- flavor oscillations of supernova neutrinos , Phys. Rev. D 77, 113002 (2008)

2008
[52]

Wood, Jake Lishman, Julien Gacon, Simon Martiel, Paul D

Ali Javadi-Abhari, Matthew Treinish, Kevin Krsulich, Christopher J. Wood, Jake Lishman, Julien Gacon, Simon Martiel, Paul D. Nation, Lev S. Bishop, An- drew W. Cross, et al., Quantum computing with Qiskit , arXiv:2405.08810

arXiv
[53]

M. H. Quenouille, Biometrika, Vol. 43, No 3/4, 353 (1956)

1956
[54]

Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter , Phys

L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter , Phys. Rev. D 17, 2369 (1978)

1978
[55]

S. P. Mikheyev et A. Yu. Smirnov, Resonance amplifi- cation of oscillations in matter and spectroscopy of so- lar neutrinos, Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, 42, 913 (1985)

1985
[56]

Hideo Aoki, Naoto Tsuji, Martin Eckstein, Marcus Kol- lar, Takashi Oka, and Philipp Werner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 779 (2014)

2014
[57]

Johns, Neutrino many-body correlations, Int

L. Johns, Neutrino many-body correlations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39, 2450122 (2024)

2024
[58]

Anson Kost, Lucas Johns, and Huaiyu Duan, Once-in- a-lifetime encounter models for neutrino media: From coherent oscillations to flavor equilibration, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103037 (2024)

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Let us consider a generic one-body ob- servable, denoted by O and a system described initially by a many-body density matrix D(0)

General aspect of fluctuations in the PSA For the initial states considered in recent applications, initial quantum fluctuations of one-body observables are easy to compute. Let us consider a generic one-body ob- servable, denoted by O and a system described initially by a many-body density matrix D(0). The mean value and quantum fluctuations of the obser...

work page

[2] [2]

ANR-22-PNQC-0002

Initial fluctuation for the neutrino case In the previous section, we outlined the general philos- ophy of the PSA approach and the prescription for the initial sampling of a generic fermionic system. We now turn to the neutrino oscillation problem, where each neu- trino is labeled by α = 1,··· N. We further focus on the setup commonly considered in recen...

work page

[3] [3]

G. M. Fuller, R. W. Mayle, J. R. Wilson, and D. N. Schramm, Resonant Neutrino Oscillations and Stellar Collapse, Astrophys. J. 322, 795 (1987)

work page 1987

[4] [4]

Notzold and G

D. Notzold and G. Raffelt, Neutrino dispersion at finite temperature and density, Nucl. Phys. B 307, 924 (1988)

work page 1988

[5] [5]

Sigl and G

G. Sigl and G. Raffelt, General kinetic description of rel- ativistic mixed neutrinos, Nucl. Phys. B 406, 423 (1993)

work page 1993

[6] [6]

H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, J. Carlson, and Y.-Z. Qian, Sim- ulation of coherent nonlinear neutrino flavor transforma- tion in the supernova environment: Correlated neutrino trajectories, Phys. Rev. D 74, 105014 (2006)

work page 2006

[7] [7]

A B Balantekin and Y Pehlivan, Neutrino–neutrino in- teractions and flavor mixing in dense matter , J. Phys. G 34, 47 (2007)

work page 2007

[8] [8]

Cristina Volpe, Neutrinos from dense environments: Flavor mechanisms, theoretical approaches, observations, and new directions, Rev

M. Cristina Volpe, Neutrinos from dense environments: Flavor mechanisms, theoretical approaches, observations, and new directions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 025004 (2024)

work page 2024