REVIEW 2 cited by
Hamiltonian treatment of non-conservative systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Hamiltonian treatment of non-conservative systems
read the original abstract
We present a novel extension of Hamiltonian mechanics to nonconservative systems built upon the Schwinger-Keldysh-Galley double-variable action principle. Departing from Galley's initial-value action, we clarify important subtleties regarding boundary conditions, the emergence of the physical-limit trajectory, and the decomposition of the Lagrangian into conservative and dissipative sectors. Importantly, we demonstrate that the redundant doubled configuration space admits a gauge freedom at the level of the canonical momenta that leaves the physical dynamics unchanged. From a Legendre transform, we construct the corresponding family of gauge-related nonconservative Hamiltonians; we show that virtually any classical initial-value problem can be embedded on our enlarged symplectic manifold, supplying the associated Hamiltonian and Lagrangian functions explicitly. As a further contribution, we derive a completely equivalent linear ``Lie'' formulation of the double-variable action and Hamiltonian which streamlines computations and renders transparent many structural properties of the formalism.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Equilibrium Propagation for Non-Conservative Systems
A modified Equilibrium Propagation with an antisymmetric-Jacobian correction computes exact cost gradients for non-conservative neural dynamics.
-
First Principles Quantization of a Non-Conservative Scalar Field
A damped scalar field is quantized via doubled variables; the path-integral propagators match in-in results, but the canonical quantization has an internal inconsistency.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.