Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 47 references

Universality on thermodynamic relation with corrections in higher-dimensional de Sitter black holes

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a universal thermodynamic extremality relation, equating the response of a black hole's extremal mass to a perturbation with a temperature-weighted entropy derivative, holds in higher-dimensional de Sitter black…

desk verdict A mostly correct higher-dimensional extension of Goon-Penco is undermined by an overclaim: the cosmological-horizon approach to the cold point C does not yield the universal relation. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19800 v1 pith:5REOSVBK submitted 2025-07-26 gr-qc hep-th

Hai-Long Zhen , Yu-Bo Ma This is my paper
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords thermodynamicextremalityrelationdeSitterblackholestwo-horizoncoexistenceregionhigher-dimensionalKerr-despacetimeKerr-Newman-deholethermodynamicsWeakGravityConjecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that the thermodynamic extremality relation, the identity linking the response of a black hole's extremal mass to a small perturbation with the temperature-weighted response of its entropy, is universal in higher-dimensional de Sitter black holes. It checks the relation in three families: topological charged de Sitter black holes with a nonlinear source, d-dimensional Kerr-de Sitter spacetimes, and a five-dimensional charged rotating de Sitter black hole. The new steps are to let the perturbation parameter enter the cosmological constant as well as the charge and angular momenta, and to approach the two extremal points of the two-horizon coexistence region along either the black-hole or the cosmological horizon. If the derivation is sound, the relation is independent of spacetime dimension and of which horizon side is used, giving a stable thermodynamic handle on extremality and on the Weak Gravity Conjecture in de Sitter backgrounds.

What carries the argument

The central object is the thermodynamic extremality relation, the identity equating the derivative of the extremal mass with respect to a perturbation to a temperature-weighted entropy derivative evaluated as the mass approaches the extremal value. The derivation mechanism is the first law, written separately on the black-hole and cosmological horizons, together with the mass--radius curve of the two-horizon coexistence region, whose two extrema are N (black-hole and cosmological horizons coincide; both temperatures vanish) and C (inner and event horizons coincide; only the black-hole temperature vanishes). For rotating cases, the mass is promoted to a function of the state parameters $S_{+,\,c}$, $J_i(\eta)$, and $Q(\eta)$, with the perturbation dependence of $J_i$ and $Q$ read off from the metric relations; the same identity is then repackaged by holding different subsets of these variables fixed.

What would settle it

Take a concrete five-dimensional Kerr-Newman-de Sitter solution with fixed g, a, b, and q, let the angular momenta and charge vary with the perturbation exactly as the metric relations of Eq. (4.3) define them, and compute both sides of Eq. (4.10) numerically over a range of perturbation strengths near the extremal points N and C; if the equality fails once the perturbation dependence of the angular momenta is implemented without independently holding them fixed, the rotating universality claim would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the higher-dimensional topological de Sitter black holes with a nonlinear charge parameter, the paper derives the identity $(\partial M_{NC}/\partial\eta)_{Q,\alpha,l} = \mp \lim_{M\to M_{NC}} (T_{+,\,c}\,\partial S_{+,\,c}/\partial\eta)_{M,Q,\alpha,l}$, with the upper sign for the black-hole horizon and the lower sign for the cosmological horizon. It then obtains the analogous identities for Kerr-de Sitter spacetime by taking the mass as a function of entropy, perturbation-dependent angular momenta, and the perturbation itself, and holding different subsets of state variables fixed, producing Eqs. (3.10), (3.11), and (3.12). For the five-dimensional Kerr-Newman-de Sitter solution, the same procedure with the mass as a function of entropy, perturbation-dependent angular momenta and charge, and the perturbation yields the six relations (4.10)--(4.15). The paper also states the conjecture that shifted thermodynamic quantities are connected by a universal relation across arbitrary black hole backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

The argument relies on the idea that a black hole's angular momentum is fixed by the spacetime metric as a function of the perturbation strength, yet is also treated as an independently held constant when the perturbation strength varies; the rotating-case relations would need this dual role to be reconciled.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The relation holds in any spacetime dimension for the topological nonlinear-source de Sitter family, so extremality corrections in higher-dimensional de Sitter black holes can be read off from entropy derivatives without a separate extremality calculation.
  • Approaching the coexistence-region extremum from the cosmological horizon gives the same identity as approaching from the black-hole horizon, so the extremality relation belongs to the two-horizon system rather than to a single horizon.
  • In rotating Kerr-de Sitter and five-dimensional charged rotating de Sitter black holes, the relation survives when angular momenta and charge carry their own perturbation dependence, extending the extremality bound to rotating backgrounds.
  • The relation also holds at the cold point C, where only the black-hole temperature vanishes, showing that universality does not require both horizon temperatures to vanish.
  • The paper's conjecture points toward a universal connection among shifted thermodynamic quantities in arbitrary black hole backgrounds, which would give a broad quantum-gravity diagnostic if established.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable next step would be to implement the relation for a solution with multiple angular momenta in dimensions beyond five, where the sums over angular momenta in Eqs. (3.10)--(3.12) become nontrivial and would probe the claimed dimension independence.
  • The abstract's conjecture of universality across arbitrary black hole backgrounds is stronger than the families worked out in the body; a natural follow-up is to formulate that conjecture as an explicit identity and test it against a known example with more than two horizons or with higher-derivative corrections beyond the nonlinear parameter.
  • If the universality is taken at face value, the relation could serve as a practical consistency check for numerical computations of black-hole thermodynamic corrections in asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes: the equality between mass and entropy derivatives would have to hold at every order in the perturbation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the Goon-Penco thermodynamic extremality relation to higher-dimensional de Sitter black holes. Working from the first law on the black-hole and cosmological horizons, the authors derive identities of the form (∂M_NC/∂η) = ∓ lim_{M→M_NC} (T_{+,c} ∂S_{+,c}/∂η) for nonlinear charged topological dS black holes in arbitrary dimension, for Kerr-dS spacetimes, and for a five-dimensional charged rotating dS black hole. The paper also considers cases in which the charge and angular momentum are functions of the perturbation parameter η and claims that the universal relation is independent of whether the extremal point N or C is approached along the black-hole or the cosmological horizon. The abstract announces a novel conjecture connecting shifted thermodynamic quantities, but no such conjecture appears in the body of the paper.

Significance. If the results were correct, this would be a useful extension of the Goon-Penco relation to dS spacetimes with two horizons, including higher dimensions and rotating configurations, and would strengthen the thermodynamic formulation of the weak gravity conjecture in cosmological settings. The paper derives the relations from explicit metric and thermodynamic data rather than fitting, which is a strength of the approach. However, the main new claims are currently not reliable: the treatment of the C point along the cosmological horizon is algebraically incorrect, and the role of η-dependent angular momentum as both a function and an independent variable is not rigorously defined. The advertised conjecture is missing, which further weakens the paper's novelty. The significance is therefore contingent on substantial revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2.12)] The claim that convergence to the cold point C along the cosmological horizon gives the same universal relation is incorrect. At C the extremal radius r_C is defined by ∂M/∂r = 0 and corresponds to the degenerate inner/event horizon, while the cosmological horizon radius r_c(M_C) is a different, regular root of g(r)=0. From the cosmological-horizon first law and Eq. (2.6), one obtains lim_{M→M_C} T_c ∂S_c/∂η = -V_{n-1}(n-1) r_c(M_C)^n/(16π l^2), whereas the true extremal derivative is (∂M_C/∂η)_{Q,α,l} = -V_{n-1}(n-1) r_C^n/(16π l^2). These differ whenever r_c(M_C) ≠ r_C, which is the generic situation. Thus Eq. (2.12) is not valid for the cosmological-horizon branch at C, and the abstract's statement that the universal conclusion is unaffected by convergence to C along either horizon is false. The same branch conflation propagates into Section 3, Eq. (3.10), and Section 4, Eq. (4.10), whenever M → M_C is taken along the cosmological horizon. The C-point claims must be restricted to the black-hole branch, or a corrected branch-dependent statement must be derived.
  2. [Section 3, Eqs. (3.8)–(3.12) and Section 4, Eqs. (4.8)–(4.15)] The treatment of J_i(η) as both a function of η and an independent variable held fixed is ambiguous and underlies the rotating generalizations. For example, Eq. (3.10) writes (∂M_NC/∂η)_{g,J(η)_i}, but if J_i(η) is a function of η, holding J_i fixed while varying η is not a well-defined partial derivative on the physical one-parameter family unless an off-shell extension of M(S,J,η) is explicitly specified. Equations (3.11), (3.12), and the Section 4 analogues depend on this dual role. The authors should define M as a function of independent thermodynamic variables (S, J_i, Q, η), state whether the partial derivatives are taken on the solution curve or in an extended state space, and justify that the first law can be used to replace ∂M/∂S and ∂M/∂J_i in the chain rule. Without this clarification, the rotating results are formal identities with unclear physical content.
  3. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and the introduction announce a 'novel conjecture' that establishes a universal relationship framework connecting shifted thermodynamic quantities across arbitrary black hole backgrounds. No conjecture is stated or proved anywhere in Sections 2–5. The paper should either state the conjecture precisely and provide evidence or verification, or remove the claim from the abstract and introduction. As written, the advertised scope exceeds the content of the manuscript.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2.8)] The notation ∓ in Eq. (2.8) is confusing because the sign assignment for the black-hole and cosmological horizons is not stated explicitly; please spell out which sign corresponds to r_+ and which to r_c.
  2. [Throughout] The symbol M_NC is overloaded: it is used for both the N point and the C point, which have different geometric meanings. Please use separate symbols such as M_N and M_C in the equations and text to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [Section 4, text before Eq. (4.8)] The sentence 'From Eq. (3.6), we have' before Eq. (4.9) should refer to Eq. (4.6), the first law for the charged rotating case, not Eq. (3.6).
  4. [Section 4, Eq. (4.3)] The formula for m uses r to represent both r_+ and r_c, but the subsequent first law and thermodynamic quantities are written with r_+,c; a brief statement clarifying the sign conventions for T_c and the first law would improve readability.
  5. [Figure 4.1] The caption of Fig. 4.1 does not list the values of g, q, a, and b used in the plot, and the axes are only described in the text; please add the parameter values and axis labels to the figure caption.
  6. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical errors and inconsistent notation, for example 'bl ack', 'S+.c', and the missing subscript in Eq. (4.13). A careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Goon–Penco relation is re-derived by direct substitution into the first law, not inferred from the claim itself.

full rationale

The central derivation in Sec. 2 starts from the explicit metric solution (2.2), the first law (2.3), and the definitions (2.4). Equations (2.6)–(2.8) are direct substitutions; (2.9) follows from the extremum condition ∂M/∂r=0 embedded in (2.5); (2.10)–(2.13) are then rewritings of the fixed-M first law. No parameter is fitted to any subset of data and no 'prediction' is read back from an output. The rotating analysis in Secs. 3–4 is likewise a chain-rule manipulation of the first law in which J(η) is treated as a function of η; whether that dual role is physically justified is a correctness concern, not a circular one. The only self-citation is Ref. [33] in Sec. 4, where η as a small perturbation is attributed to [16,32,33] collectively; that citation is contextual and not load-bearing, since the subsequent equations do not depend on any unproved uniqueness or universal theorem from [33]. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation introduces no fitted constants or new entities. It relies on the first law, the extremal condition, and known metric solutions. The main unstated assumptions are the validity of the first law on the cosmological horizon and the clean separation of η-dependent and independent state variables.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The first law of black hole thermodynamics holds on both the black hole and cosmological horizons.
    Used in Eqs. (2.3), (3.7), and (4.6) to derive the universal relations; it is assumed without proof.
  • domain assumption The extremal points N and C are determined by ∂M/∂r=0.
    Defines the horizon coincidence points used as M→M_NC limits in Sections 2-4.
  • domain assumption The metrics for higher-dimensional topological dS, Kerr-dS, and 5D KNdS are exact solutions from Refs [38-43].
    The thermodynamic quantities are read off from these solutions, which are taken from prior literature.
  • domain assumption The perturbation parameters η and α are small so that first-order perturbation theory applies.
    Used when treating η as the perturbation parameter in the cosmological constant and α as a small nonlinear correction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universality on thermodynamic relation with corrections in higher-dimensional de Sitter black holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5REOSVBK

@misc{pith2026250719800,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universality on thermodynamic relation with corrections in higher-dimensional de Sitter black holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5REOSVBK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19800}
}
abstract

In this study, the methodology proposed by Goon and Penco for investigating the universality on thermodynamic relations with corrections in de Sitter black holes is extended. A universal thermodynamic extremality relation, under consideration of the mass of the spacetime $M$ with various state parameters, proposed by Goon and Penco is investigated in higher dimensional spacetime, the established universal conclusions are not impacted by the convergence of energy from the coexistence region of two horizons to the point $N$ or $C$. Furthermore, by incorporating the shift of the angular momentum into our analysis, a more universal relation is derived, specifically applicable to rotating configurations. Notably, a novel conjecture is formulated that establishes a universal relationship framework connecting shifted thermodynamic quantities across arbitrary black hole backgrounds. These findings are expected to offer profound insights into the fundamental principles of quantum gravity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19800 by the authors.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. FIG. 2.1: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. FIG. 4.1: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Universality on thermodynamic relation with corrections in higher-dimensional de Sitter black holes

    INTRODUCTION Black holes are of significant consequence in the evolution of the univ erse. They are capable of devoring matter in their vicinity, releasing considerable quantities of energy in the pro cess. Furthermore, black holes are capable of releasing energy in the form of jets, which can exert an influence on the formation and evolution of galaxies. O...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    L(F ) is the Lagrangian of non-linear source with the Maxwell invariant F =F µνFµν , in which Fµν =∂µAν −∂νAµ is the electromagnetic field tensor and Aµ is the gauge potential

    HIGHER DIMENSIONAL TOPOLOGICAL DS BLACK HOLES WITH NONLI NEAR SOURCE The (n + 1) dimensional action of Einstein gravity with a nonlinear source had been demonstrated in Refs [38–40], as follows IG = − 1 16π ∫ M dn+1x√−g[R − 2(1 +η)Λ +L(F )] − 1 8π ∫ ∂M dnx√−γΘ(γ), L(F ) = −F +αF 2 + O(α2), (2.1) where R and Λ are the scalar curvature and the cosmological ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    THE D-DIMENSIONAL KERR-DS SP ACETIMES It has been demonstrated that the d-dimensional Kerr-dS spacetimes [41, 42] are solutions to the Einst ein equations Rab = 2(1 +η)Λ (d − 2) gab. (3.1) 5 Thus, we obtained the metric in dS spacetime as follows: ds2 = −W (1 − (1 +η)g2r2)dt2 + 2m U ( Wdt − N∑ i=1 aiµidϕi Ξi ) 2 + N∑ i=1 r2 +a2 i Ξi (µ2 idϕ2 i +dµ2 i ) + ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The aforementioned solution comprises axially symmetric black holes with an axis of rotation

    CHARGED-DS ROTATING BLACK HOLE IN n = 5 Finally, the relation will be verified for a charged-dS rotating black ho le in n = 5. The aforementioned solution comprises axially symmetric black holes with an axis of rotation. It is imp ortant to note that the action is identical to the SdS action, leading to a process similar to the SdS case: The n = 5 Kerr-New...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The findings align with those reporte d in Ref [16]

    SUMMAR Y In the preceding analysis, the primary thesis examines how the beha vior of the state parameters and the position of the horizon change in response to variations in the spacetime per turbation paratemeter, η, while other parameters of spacetime remain constant. The findings align with those reporte d in Ref [16]. Additionally, the results from Ref...

    work page

  6. [6]

    The event horizon telescope collaboration et al, First M 87 event horizon telescope results. I. The shadow of the supe rmassive black hole, ApJL 875 L1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    The event horizon telescope collaboration et al, First M 87 event horizon telescope results. II. Array and instrumen tation, ApJL 875 L2 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    W, Commun

    Hawking S. W, Commun. Math. Phys 43(3), 199-220 (1975)

    work page 1975

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Bekenstein J. D, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333-2346 (1973)

    1973

  2. [10]

    Wei, Y.X

    S.W. Wei, Y.X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 91, 044018 (2015), arXiv: 1411.5749 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Wei, Y.X

    S.W. Wei, Y.X. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 111302 (2015), a rXiv:1502.00386 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Wei, Y.X

    S.W. Wei, Y.X. Liu, R.B. Mann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 07110 3 (2019), arXiv:1906.10840[gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    D.Y. Chen, J. Tao, X.T. Yang, Phys. Dark Univ. 42 (2023) 10 1379, arXiv:2311.11586 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Sokoliuk, S

    O. Sokoliuk, S. Pradhan, A. Baransky, P.K. Sahoo, Fortsc h. Phys. 72 (2024) 1, 2300043, arXiv:2311.02145[gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ruppeiner, A

    G. Ruppeiner, A. M. Sturzu, Phys.Rev.D 108 (2023) 8, 086 004, arXiv:2304.06187[gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Bukhari, B

    S.M.A.S. Bukhari, B. Pourhassan, H. Aounallah, L.G. Wa ng, Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023) 22, 225007, arXiv:2304.00940[gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    G.R. Li, G.P. Li, S. Guo, Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) 19 , 195011, arXiv:2304.00842[gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Guo, H.F

    X.Y. Guo, H.F. Li, L.C. Zhang, R. Zhao, Phys.Rev.D 100 (2 019) 6, 064036, arXiv:1901.04703[gr-qc ]

    1901 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Hamed, L

    N.A. Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa, JHEP 06 (2007 ) 060, arXiv:hep-th/0601001. 5

    2007 arXiv

  12. [21]

    G. Goon, R. Penco, Phys. Rev. Lett, 124 (2020) 101103, ar Xiv:1909.05254

    2020 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Y.P. Wang, L. Ma and Y. Pang, JCAP 01 (2023) 007, arXiv:22 09.00772

    2023

  14. [23]

    Cheung, J

    C. Cheung, J. Liu and G. N. Remmen, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 4, 046003, arXiv:1903.09156 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Y. Kats, L. Motl and M. Padi, JHEP 12 (2007) 068, arXiv:he p-th/0606100

    2007

  16. [25]

    Cheung, J

    C. Cheung, J. Liu and G. N. Remmen, JHEP 10 (2018) 004, arX iv:1801.08546

    2018 arXiv

  17. [26]

    P. A. Cano, S. Chimento, R. Linares, JHEP 02 (2020) 031, a rXiv:1910.14324

    2020 arXiv

  18. [27]

    P. A. Cano, T. Ortin, P. F. Ramirez, JHEP 02 (2020) 175, ar Xiv:1909.08530 [hep-th] 10

    2020 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Anand, arXiv:2409.07079

    A. Anand, arXiv:2409.07079

    arXiv

  20. [29]

    L. Ma, Y. Pang and H. Lu, JHEP 06 (2023) 087, arXiv:2304.0 8527 [hep-th]

    2023

  21. [30]

    S.W. Wei, K. Yang and Y.X. Liu, Nucl. Phys. B 962 (2021) 11 5279, arXiv:2003.06785

    2021 arXiv

  22. [31]

    H. S. Reall and J. E. Santos, JHEP 04 (2019) 021, arXiv:19 01.11535

    2019

  23. [32]

    L. Ma, Y.Z. Li, H. Lu, JHEP 01 (2021) 201, arXiv:2009.000 15

    2021

  24. [33]

    McPeak, Phys

    B. McPeak, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) L081901, arXiv:2112. 13433

    2022

  25. [34]

    Sadeghi, B

    J. Sadeghi, B. Pourhassan, S. Noori Gashti and S. Upadhy ay, Annals Phys. 447 (2022) 169168, arXiv:2201.04071

    2022 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Nam, Eur

    C.H. Nam, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 418

    2018

  27. [36]

    J. Ko, B. Gwak, JHEP 03 (2024) 072, arXiv:2312.17014

    2024 arXiv

  28. [37]

    J. Ko, B. Gwak, Phys. Lett. B 860 (2025) 139149, arXiv:24 06.10567

    2025

  29. [38]

    Y.B. Ma, S.T. Zheng, L. Li, Chin. Phys. C 49 (2025) 4

    2025

  30. [39]

    Sadeghi, B

    J. Sadeghi, B. Pourhassan, S. Noori Gashti, S. Upadhyay , E. Naghd Mezerji, Phys. Scr. 98 (2023) 025305, arXiv:2011. 14366

    2023

  31. [40]

    K.P. Lu, P.Y. Wu, H. Lu, arXiv:hep-th/0509212

    arXiv

  32. [41]

    D.Y. Chen, J. Tao, P. Wang, Chin. Phys. C 45 (2021) 2, 0251 08, arXiv:2004.10459 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Sadeghi, S.N

    J. Sadeghi, S.N. Gashti, I. Sakalli, B. Pourhassan, Nuc l. Phys. B 1004 (2024) 116581, arXiv:2011.05109 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Hendi, M

    S.H. Hendi, M. Momennia, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 54, arX iv:1501.04863 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Y.Z. Du, H.F. Li, L.C. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 4, 3 70, arXiv:2104.10309

    2022 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Zhang, L.C

    Y. Zhang, L.C. Zhang, R. Zhao, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34 (2019 ) 31, 1950254. arXiv:1910.14223

    2019 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Dolan, D

    B.P. Dolan, D. Kastor, D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann, J. Trasch en, Rev. D 87 (2013) 10, 104017. arXiv:1301.5926 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Chong, M

    Z.W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H.Lu, C.N. Pope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 161301, arXiv:hep-th/0506029

    2005 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Gibbons, M.J

    G.W. Gibbons, M.J. Perry, C.N. Pope, Class. Quant. Grav . 22 (2005) 1503-1526. arXiv:hep-th/0408217

    2005 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.