Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 168 references

On correlation functions of the open XYZ spin 1/2 chain with boundary fields related by a constraint

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Open XYZ spin chain with one boundary constraint: correlation blocks are exact finite multiple sums and thermodynamic-limit integrals, with no non-local tail operators.

desk verdict A serious, honestly-conditional extension of the SoV correlation program to the open XYZ chain; the main gap is the unproven identification of the ground state with a generalized Bethe state. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20299 v1 pith:7A6Z25R5 submitted 2025-07-27 math-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath.MPnlin.SI

classification math-phcond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath.MPnlin.SI MSC 81R1282B2382B20
keywords XYZspinchaineight-vertexmodelcorrelationfunctionsseparationofvariablesVertex-IRFtransformationboundaryfieldsBetheansatzthermodynamiclimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that correlation functions of the fully anisotropic open XYZ spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ chain are exactly computable when the six boundary-field parameters are tied together by a single constraint. Its chief claim is that the elementary building blocks of zero-temperature correlation functions — matrix elements of a specially gauged basis of local operators acting on the first $m$ sites — are finite multiple sums of elliptic $\theta$ functions on an $N$-site chain, and multiple integrals in the half-infinite chain limit, with integrands built from the ground-state Bethe-root density $\rho(\lambda)$ and elliptic functions. If correct, this puts XYZ on the same footing as the previously solved XXX and XXZ open chains and removes the non-local "tail operators" that earlier infinite-volume approaches required. The paper's own restriction is that the ground state must be describable as a generalized Bethe state, an identification it supports by a completeness conjecture it marks as unproven.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through four interlocking pieces. First, Baxter's Vertex-IRF transformation — a gauge transformation that re-expresses the eight-vertex model in terms of a dynamical six-vertex (face) model — produces gauged operators whose $B$-operator is pseudo-diagonalized by a separation-of-variables (SoV) basis, so that every separate state with product-form $Q$ becomes a generalized Bethe state: a monomial of gauged $B$-operators acting on a tensor-product reference state. Second, the boundary-bulk decomposition (3.65), stated in Proposition 5.1, rewrites each gauged boundary $B$-operator as a sum of bulk operators, letting local operators act on the simpler bulk Bethe states through the reconstructed bulk monodromy. Third, the gauged local basis $E^{\epsilon',\epsilon}_m(\alpha,\beta)$ of (5.10) is chosen so that its action on a generalized boundary Bethe state returns a multiple sum of the same type of states, provided the number of gauged $B$-operators is conserved, which is condition (6.8). Fourth, a generalized Slavnov determinant representation of scalar products of separate states, taken from the companion paper [2], converts the resulting sums of scalar-product ratios into ratios of determinants, yielding the finite-size formula (6.19); the thermodynamic limit then follows from the density integral equation (6.26)–(6.28) obeyed by the ground-state Bethe roots.

What would settle it

For a small chain ($N=4$ or $6$) with boundary parameters in the regime (6.23)–(6.24) satisfying the constraint (4.56), evaluate the finite multiple sum (6.19) for a two-site block using the corresponding solution $Q$ of the functional $TQ$-equation (4.57), and compare the value with exact diagonalization of the Hamiltonian (2.1): agreement across configurations would confirm the ground-state identification, while any mismatch would show the ground state escapes the product-form $Q$ description.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is that, once the local-operator basis is gauged through the Vertex-IRF transformation, the correlation blocks of the constrained open XYZ chain have exactly the same structural form as those of the XXX and XXZ chains. Theorem 6.1 asserts that under the constraint (4.56) on the six boundary parameters, and for operator blocks $E^{\epsilon',\epsilon}_m(\alpha,\beta)$ satisfying the counting condition (6.8), the ground-state mean value $\langle E^{\epsilon',\epsilon}_m(\alpha,\beta)\rangle$ in the state $|Q\rangle$ is given by the exact finite multiple sum (6.19); in the half-infinite chain limit this becomes the multiple integral (6.41), whose contours run along the real interval fixed by the Bethe-root density $\rho(\lambda)$ and around certain boundary-root poles. Because the computed blocks form a basis of the local operator algebra on the first $m$ sites, any quasi-local operator can be assembled from them by linear combination. The paper further shows that in the trigonometric limit the same formulas reduce to the previously obtained XXZ results, and that no non-local tail operators are needed.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the ground state of the chain is among the states described by a product-form solution $Q$ of the functional $TQ$-equation (4.57), an identification the paper supports only by a completeness conjecture it explicitly notes is unproven; if the true ground state falls outside those sectors, the derived sums and integrals describe a different state's correlations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any quasi-local operator on the first $m$ sites of the constrained open XYZ chain is a linear combination of the computed blocks, so multi-site correlation functions become finite algebraic sums on the lattice and, in the thermodynamic limit, multiple integrals of the form (6.41).
  • The XXX, XXZ and XYZ open chains fit one formula template once the operator basis is gauged in the same way, so structural results and computational strategies can migrate between the three models.
  • All explicit dependence on the boundary fields enters through two of the six boundary parameters (those fixing the gauge parameters $\alpha$ and $\beta$); every other boundary parameter acts only through the Bethe-root density and the choice of integration contours.
  • In the trigonometric limit $\Im\omega\to+\infty$ the new expressions reduce to the previously obtained XXZ correlation formulas, providing an internal consistency check that the XYZ formulas are the correct elliptic generalization.
  • Because no tail operators appear, the correlation blocks are fully determined by the separation-of-variables eigenstate data, so the sums and integrals can be evaluated numerically for small chains and for the half-infinite chain.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the completeness conjecture behind the functional $TQ$-equation description is eventually proven, the same machinery would supply exact correlation formulas for every eigenstate, not only the presumed ground state, making excited-state and finite-temperature correlators accessible through the same sums.
  • The counting condition (6.8) excludes local operators that change the number of gauged $B$-operators, so spin-flip-like blocks are currently out of reach; extending the scalar-product determinant to those sectors, which the paper identifies as the next step, would complete the operator basis.
  • Because the half-infinite formulas isolate boundary roots as order-one contributions, they predict that boundary-induced correlations in the XYZ chain are governed by isolated complex Bethe roots; that prediction can be tested by comparing the integral (6.41) with tensor-network computations of the half-infinite chain at the same boundary parameters.
  • The factorization of the integrand into one determinant depending only on the Bethe-root density and a product of elliptic functions suggests that long-distance asymptotics of XYZ correlators are controlled by the same density-integral data as in the XXZ chain, so the existing asymptotic technology for XXZ could in principle be adapted to XYZ.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the open XYZ spin-1/2 chain with the most general integrable boundary fields subject to a single constraint relating the six boundary parameters. Working in Sklyanin's quantum Separation of Variables framework combined with a Vertex-IRF gauge transformation, the authors derive exact finite-size multiple-sum representations for matrix elements of a specially chosen basis of local operators in eigenstates described by solutions of a TQ-equation; in the half-infinite chain limit these become multiple integrals whose integrands depend on the Bethe-root density and elliptic theta functions. The main results are Theorem 6.1 (finite-size elementary blocks) and the thermodynamic-limit formula (6.41). The paper explicitly acknowledges that the identification of the physical ground state with the class of TQ Bethe states relies on an unproven completeness conjecture, and that only correlation blocks preserving the number of B-operators are computed.

Significance. If correct, this is a substantial step forward: it would provide the first finite-lattice SoV-based correlation-function formulas for the open XYZ chain with generic integrable boundary conditions (up to one constraint), generalizing the XXZ results of [1] and avoiding non-local tail operators. The algebraic skeleton is coherent, the derivations are parameter-free in the sense that no quantities are fitted to the target, and the paper contains explicit determinant representations and a careful trigonometric limit to the XXZ case. The main reservations are not about internal consistency but about the gap between what is proved (matrix elements of special TQ Bethe states) and what is claimed in the abstract (ground-state correlation functions), as well as the heavy reliance on conjectured Bethe-root structure in the thermodynamic limit.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.4, §6] The central identification of |Q⟩ with the physical ground state is not proved. In §4.4 the paper states that it was conjectured in [171] (with numerical support in [172,173]) that the two TQ sectors give the whole spectrum, and that this is 'enough for our present purpose'; Section 6 then says 'we suppose that the ground state is among the states which can be described in terms of a solution Q of the form (4.45)'. If this completeness conjecture fails, or holds only in parameter regions outside the regime (6.23)–(6.25) used for the thermodynamic limit, then the finite sum (6.19) and the integral (6.41) are still exact matrix elements of special TQ Bethe states, but they are not the ground-state correlation functions promised in the abstract. Because this is the load-bearing step of the paper, I ask that the authors either prove that the ground state lies in this class for the relevant parameter regime or, at minimum, provide a small-N exact-diagonalization check of (6.19) for representative values satisfying the constraint (4.56).
  2. [§5.2, Proposition 5.2 and §6.1, Theorem 6.1] The proofs of the key action formula (5.24)–(5.25) and of the final finite-size determinant formula (6.19) are deferred with statements such as 'completely similar to the proof of Proposition 4.4 of [5]' and 'the computation of this action can be done similarly as for the XXZ case, see [5]'. While the overall strategy may indeed be parallel, the elliptic case involves different coefficients (A.19) and (A.21) and the cancellation mechanism must be verified with theta-function identities. As written, a reader cannot check these central formulae without reconstructing the arguments from the two previous papers. I request that the induction step for the elliptic case be written out, at least for the non-trivial coefficient (A.19)–(A.21) and for the cancellation identity (A.28)–(A.29), or that these derivations be moved into an appendix.
  3. [§6.2] The thermodynamic-limit result (6.41) rests on an assumed Bethe-root structure: real roots condensing on (0,π/2) with density satisfying the integral equation (6.26), boundary roots of the form (6.29) with exponentially small deviations, and the estimates (6.30)–(6.36). The paper states that 'we restrict our study to configurations of the boundary fields for which the ground state is in the sector... characterized in the homogeneous and thermodynamic limit by...' but no derivation or reference to a proof of this structure for the XYZ chain is provided, and the density (6.28) is simply taken over from the XXZ case. This makes the thermodynamic-limit formula conditional on a conjecture. The authors should either prove this root-density characterization for the XYZ case (or cite a proof), or explicitly label it as an assumption and state the resulting conditional status of (6.41).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 5] There are two results numbered 'Proposition 5.1': the basis statement in the introduction to Section 5 and the boundary-bulk decomposition in Section 5.1. The second should be renumbered.
  2. [Eq. (5.25)] In the formula for F^{B^{ε,ε'}}, the variable ξ_k appears without definition; it should presumably be ξ_k^{(1)} or ξ_k^{(0)} depending on the context. Please clarify.
  3. [Eq. (3.62)] The notation '\tilde\epsilon^-_i \alpha\alpha^-_i' in the denominator of the second expression for a_-(λ|\tilde\epsilon_{\alpha^-}) is garbled; it should read \tilde\epsilon_{\alpha^-_i}\,\alpha^-_i.
  4. [Eq. (6.19) and (6.16)] The notation 'det_M' in (6.19) is used before the matrices N and M are defined in (6.16)–(6.18); please define the determinant notation at first use.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract states that the paper derives correlation functions for the open XYZ chain, while the body repeatedly conditions the identification of the computed matrix elements with ground-state correlation functions on a conjecture. Consider tempering the abstract accordingly, or explicitly stating the conditional nature of the main claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; correlation blocks are conditional theorems derived from parameter-free SoV and scalar-product results, with the ground-state identification resting on an explicitly stated unproven completeness conjecture.

full rationale

The central derivation is a chain of conditional exact statements, not a fit. Theorem 6.1 asserts that for any solution Q of the product form (4.45) satisfying the TQ-equation (4.57), the mean value (6.2) equals the multiple sum (6.19). The main new input is the action formula for gauged local operators on boundary Bethe states (Theorem 5.1), itself derived from the bulk action (Proposition 5.2) and the boundary-bulk decomposition. The scalar-product ratio (6.10) is quoted from the authors' previous paper [2], but that result is a separate parameter-free Slavnov-type determinant statement with stated hypotheses; it does not presuppose the block formula being derived, and no parameter is fitted to the target quantity. The only genuinely load-bearing non-derived element is the identification of the physical ground state with a separate state |Q⟩ of product form. The paper is explicit that this rests on a conjecture: Section 4.4 states 'It was conjectured in [171]... that one obtains the whole spectrum by combining these two sectors' and adds 'which is enough for our present purpose', while Section 6 says 'we suppose that the ground state is among the states which can be described in terms of a solution Q of the form (4.45)'. The Conclusion likewise states that 'It would also be desirable to have an analytical proof of the completeness conjecture of [171–173]'. This is an acknowledged assumption and a correctness risk if it fails, but it is not a circular reduction: it concerns which physical state the formula describes, not how the formula is obtained from the model data. The heavy reliance on the same authors' previous works [1,2,5] is mathematical continuity rather than circularity, since those works provide independent derivations with stated assumptions that do not include the present target result. The trigonometric-limit check in Appendix B recovers the XXZ results of [1], providing an internal consistency check; the absence of an external numerical benchmark is a verification gap, not evidence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted to data; all six boundary parameters and arbitrary inhomogeneities are inputs, and the gauge parameters are fixed by the constraints (3.38) and (3.64). The integer M labels the Bethe sector, and Q is determined by the TQ-equation. No new physical entities are introduced; the constructions are gauges and bases, not new ontological elements.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Elliptic theta-function identities and the Vertex-IRF gauge transformation are used as background tools.
    Invoked throughout Sections 3-5 and Appendices A-B without proof; these are established results in exactly solvable models.
  • domain assumption Boundary fields are restricted by the single constraint (4.56), connecting the six boundary parameters to (N-2M-1)η.
    This is the defining class for which the TQ-equation and Slavnov determinant formulas apply; the paper does not treat unconstrained boundaries.
  • domain assumption Inhomogeneities satisfy the generic-position condition (4.11).
    Needed for the SoV basis to be well-defined and for the orthogonality (4.32); exceptions are excluded.
  • ad hoc to paper The ground state lies in the sector described by a Q-solution of (4.57) of the form (4.45); completeness of this description is conjectural [171-173].
    The paper states 'It was conjectured in [171]... that one obtains the whole spectrum...' and then uses the ground state as such a state (Section 4.4 and start of Section 6).
  • domain assumption In the thermodynamic limit, the ground-state Bethe roots are real, condensating on (0,π/2) with density ρ solving (6.26)-(6.27), possibly plus boundary roots of the form (6.29).
    Taken from the XXZ analysis [145,174]; the paper says 'as in the XXZ case' without an independent XYZ proof (Section 6.2).
  • ad hoc to paper The gauge function g_- is fixed by (4.52) so that the SoV reference state coincides with the gauge-transformed reference state |η,x⟩, and the sign choice ε is aligned with (4.60).
    This normalization is a choice made to obtain the boundary-bulk decomposition; different choices would change intermediate formulas.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On correlation functions of the open XYZ spin 1/2 chain with boundary fields related by a constraint." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7A6Z25R5

@misc{pith2026250720299,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On correlation functions of the open XYZ spin 1/2 chain with boundary fields related by a constraint},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7A6Z25R5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20299}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we consider the quantum XYZ open spin-1/2 chain with boundary fields. We focus on the particular case in which the six boundary parameters are related by a single constraint enabling us to describe part of the spectrum by standard Bethe equations. We derive for this model exact representations for a set of elementary blocks of correlation functions, hence generalising to XYZ the results obtained in the XXZ open case in arXiv:2208.10097. Our approach is also similar to the approach proposed in the XXZ case arXiv:2208.10097: we solve the model by Sklyanin's version of the quantum Separation of Variables, using Baxter's Vertex-IRF transformation; in this framework, we identify a basis of local operators with a relatively simple action on the transfer matrix eigenstates; we then use the solution of the quantum inverse problem and our recent formulae on scalar products of separate states arXiv:2402.04112 to compute some of the corresponding matrix elements, which can therefore be considered as elementary building blocks for the correlation functions. The latter are expressed in terms of multiple sums in the finite chain, and as multiple integrals in the thermodynamic limit. Our results evidence that, once the basis of local operators is properly chosen, the corresponding building blocks for correlation functions have a similar structure in the XXX/XXZ/XYZ open chains, and do not require any insertion of non-local "tail operators".

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

168 extracted references · 110 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Niccoli and V

    G. Niccoli and V . Terras,On correlation functions for the open XXZ chain with non-longitudinal bound- ary fields : the case with a constraint, SciPost Phys. 16, 099 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.4.099

  2. [171]

    Yang and Y .-Z

    W.-L. Yang and Y .-Z. Zhang, T–Q relation and exact solution for the XYZ chain with general non- diagonal boundary terms, Nucl. Phys. B 744(3), 312 (2006), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.03.025

  3. [5]

    Niccoli and V

    G. Niccoli and V . Terras, Correlation functions for open XXZ spin 1/2 quantum chains with unparallel boundary magnetic fields, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 55(40), 405203 (2022), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac7ca1

  4. [2]

    Niccoli and V

    G. Niccoli and V . Terras,The open XYZ spin 1/2 chain: Separation of Variables and scalar products for boundary fields related by a constraint, ArXiv:2402.04112

  5. [3]

    Niccoli, H

    G. Niccoli, H. Pei and V . Terras, Correlation functions by separation of variables: the XXX spin chain, SciPost Phys. 10, 006 (2021), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.1.006

  6. [4]

    Niccoli, Correlation functions for open XXX spin 1/2 quantum chains with unparallel boundary magnetic fields, ArXiv:2105.07992

    G. Niccoli, Correlation functions for open XXX spin 1/2 quantum chains with unparallel boundary magnetic fields, ArXiv:2105.07992

  7. [6]

    E. K. Sklyanin, The quantum Toda chain, In N. Sanchez, ed., Non-Linear Equations in Classical and Quantum Field Theory, pp. 196–233. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-540- 39352-8, doi:10.1007/3-540-15213-X_80 (1985)

  8. [7]

    E. K. Sklyanin, Goryachev-Chaplygin top and the inverse scattering method , J. Soviet Math. 31(6), 3417 (1985), doi:10.1007/BF02107243

Show all 168 references
  1. [8]

    E. K. Sklyanin, Functional Bethe Ansatz , In B. Kupershmidt, ed., Integrable and Superintegrable Systems, pp. 8–33. World Scientific, Singapore, doi:10.1142/9789812797179_0002 (1990)

  2. [9]

    E. K. Sklyanin, Quantum inverse scattering method. Selected topics , In M.-L. Ge, ed., Quantum Group and Quantum Integrable Systems , pp. 63–97. Nankai Lectures in Mathematical Physics, World Scientific, doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9211111 (1992), https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/ 9211111

  3. [10]

    E. K. Sklyanin, Separation of variables. New trends , Prog. Theor. Phys. 118, 35 (1995), doi:10.1143/PTPS.118.35

  4. [11]

    E. K. Sklyanin, Separation of variables in the quantum integrable models related to the Yangian Y [sl(3)], Journal of Mathematical Sciences 80(3), 1861 (1996), doi:10.1007/BF02362784. 15Note that, from our choice of domain (6.23)-(6.24), the trigonometric limit of (6.41) natur...

  5. [12]

    Babelon, D

    O. Babelon, D. Bernard and F. A. Smirnov, Quantization of solitons and the restricted sine-gordon model, Communications in Mathematical Physics 182(2), 319 (1996), doi:10.1007/BF02517893, https://projecteuclid.org:443/euclid.cmp/1104288151

  6. [13]

    F. A. Smirnov, Structure of matrix elements in the quantum Toda chain, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31(44), 8953 (1998), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/31/44/019

  7. [14]

    F. A. Smirnov, Separation of variables for quantum integrable models related toUq(ˆsln), In M. Kashi- wara and T. Miwa, eds., MathPhys Odyssey 2001 , vol. 23 of Progress in Mathematical Physics , pp. 455–465. Birkhäuser, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0087-1_17 (2002)

  8. [15]

    S. E. Derkachov, G. Korchemsky and A. N. Manashov, Noncompact Heisenberg spin magnets from high–energy QCD. I. Baxter Q–operator and separation of variables , Nucl. Phys. B 617, 375 (2001), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00457-6

  9. [16]

    S. E. Derkachov, G. P. Korchemsky, and A. N. Manashov, Separation of variables for the quantum SL(2,R) spin chain, JHEP 07, 047 (2003), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/07/047

  10. [17]

    S. E. Derkachov, G. P. Korchemsky and A. N. Manashov,Baxter Q-operator and separation of variables for the open SL(2,R) spin chain, JHEP 10, 053 (2003), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/10/053

  11. [18]

    Bytsko and J

    A. Bytsko and J. Teschner, Quantization of models with non–compact quantum group symmetry. Modular XXZ magnet and lattice sinh–Gordon model , J. Phys. A: Mat. Gen. 39, 12927 (2006), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/41/S11

  12. [20]

    Frahm, A

    H. Frahm, A. Seel and T. Wirth, Separation of variables in the open XXX chain, Nucl. Phys. B 802, 351 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.04.008

  13. [21]

    Amico, H

    L. Amico, H. Frahm, A. Osterloh and T. Wirth,Separation of variables for integrable spin-boson models, Nucl. Phys. B 839(3), 604 (2010), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.07.005

  14. [22]

    Niccoli and J

    G. Niccoli and J. Teschner, The Sine-Gordon model revisited I , J. Stat. Mech. 2010, P09014 (2010), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2010/09/P09014

  15. [23]

    Niccoli, Reconstruction of Baxter Q-operator from Sklyanin SOV for cyclic representations of inte- grable quantum models, Nucl

    G. Niccoli, Reconstruction of Baxter Q-operator from Sklyanin SOV for cyclic representations of inte- grable quantum models, Nucl. Phys. B 835, 263 (2010), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.03.009

  16. [24]

    Niccoli, Completeness of Bethe Ansatz by Sklyanin SOV for cyclic representations of integrable quantum models, JHEP 03, 123 (2011), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2011)123

    G. Niccoli, Completeness of Bethe Ansatz by Sklyanin SOV for cyclic representations of integrable quantum models, JHEP 03, 123 (2011), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2011)123

  17. [25]

    Frahm, J

    H. Frahm, J. H. Grelik, A. Seel and T. Wirth, Functional Bethe ansatz methods for the open XXX chain, J. Phys A: Math. Theor. 44, 015001 (2011), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/1/015001

  18. [26]

    Grosjean, J

    N. Grosjean, J. M. Maillet and G. Niccoli, On the form factors of local operators in the lattice sine- Gordon model, J. Stat. Mech. 2012, P10006 (2012), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2012/10/P10006

  19. [28]

    Niccoli, Non-diagonal open spin-1/2 XXZ quantum chains by separation of variables: Complete spectrum and matrix elements of some quasi-local operators , J

    G. Niccoli, Non-diagonal open spin-1/2 XXZ quantum chains by separation of variables: Complete spectrum and matrix elements of some quasi-local operators , J. Stat. Mech. 2012, P10025 (2012), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2012/10/P10025

  20. [29]

    Niccoli, Antiperiodic spin-1/2 XXZ quantum chains by separation of variables: Complete spectrum and form factors, Nucl

    G. Niccoli, Antiperiodic spin-1/2 XXZ quantum chains by separation of variables: Complete spectrum and form factors, Nucl. Phys. B 870, 397 (2013), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.01.017. 43

  21. [30]

    Niccoli, An antiperiodic dynamical six-vertex model: I

    G. Niccoli, An antiperiodic dynamical six-vertex model: I. Complete spectrum by SOV, matrix elements of the identity on separate states and connections to the periodic eight-vertex model , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46, 075003 (2013), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/7/075003

  22. [31]

    Niccoli, Form factors and complete spectrum of XXX antiperiodic higher spin chains by quantum separation of variables, J

    G. Niccoli, Form factors and complete spectrum of XXX antiperiodic higher spin chains by quantum separation of variables, J. Math. Phys. 54, 053516 (2013), doi:10.1063/1.4807078

  23. [32]

    Grosjean, J

    N. Grosjean, J. M. Maillet and G. Niccoli, On the form factors of local operators in the Bazhanov- Stroganov and chiral Potts models, Annales Henri Poincaré 16, 1103 (2015), doi:10.1007/s00023-014- 0358-9

  24. [33]

    Faldella and G

    S. Faldella and G. Niccoli, SOV approach for integrable quantum models associated with general rep- resentations on spin-1/2 chains of the 8-vertex reflection algebra, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 115202 (2014), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/11/115202

  25. [34]

    Faldella, N

    S. Faldella, N. Kitanine and G. Niccoli, The complete spectrum and scalar products for the open spin- 1/2 XXZ quantum chains with non-diagonal boundary terms , J. Stat. Mech. 2014, P01011 (2014), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/01/P01011

  26. [35]

    Kitanine, J

    N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet and G. Niccoli, Open spin chains with generic integrable boundaries: Baxter equation and Bethe ansatz completeness from separation of variables , J. Stat. Mech. 2015, P05015 (2014), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/05/P05015

  27. [36]

    Niccoli and V

    G. Niccoli and V . Terras, Antiperiodic XXZ chains with arbitrary spins: Complete eigenstate con- struction by functional equations in separation of variables , Lett. Math. Phys. 105, 989 (2015), doi:10.1007/s11005-015-0759-9

  28. [37]

    Levy-Bencheton, G

    D. Levy-Bencheton, G. Niccoli and V . Terras, Antiperiodic dynamical 6-vertex model by separa- tion of variables II : Functional equations and form factors , J. Stat. Mech. 2016, 033110 (2016), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2016/03/033110

  29. [38]

    Niccoli and V

    G. Niccoli and V . Terras,The 8-vertex model with quasi-periodic boundary conditions, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 044001 (2016), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/4/044001

  30. [39]

    Kitanine, J

    N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet, G. Niccoli and V . Terras, On determinant representations of scalar products and form factors in the SoV approach: the XXX case , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 104002 (2016), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/10/104002, https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02630

  31. [40]

    Jiang, S

    Y . Jiang, S. Komatsu, I. Kostov and D. Serban, The hexagon in the mirror: the three-point function in the SoV representation, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 49(17), 174007 (2016), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/17/174007

  32. [42]

    J. M. Maillet, G. Niccoli and B. Pezelier, Transfer matrix spectrum for cyclic representations of the 6-vertex reflection algebra I, SciPost Phys. 2, 009 (2017), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.2.1.009

  33. [44]

    Bethe, Zür Theorie der Metalle I

    H. Bethe, Zür Theorie der Metalle I. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen Atomkete, Zeitschrift für Physik 71, 205 (1931), doi:10.1007/BF01341708

  34. [45]

    R. J. Baxter, Eight-vertex model in lattice statistics , Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 832 (1971), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.832. 44

  35. [46]

    R. J. Baxter, One-dimensional anisotropic Heisenberg chain , Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 834 (1971), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.834

  36. [47]

    R. J. Baxter, Partition function of the eight-vertex lattice model , Ann. Phys. 70, 193 (1972), doi:10.1016/0003-4916(72)90335-1

  37. [48]

    R. J. Baxter, Eight-vertex model in lattice statistics and one-dimensional anisotropic Heisenberg chain II, Ann. Phys. 76, 25 (1973), doi:10.1016/0003-4916(73)90440-5

  38. [49]

    R. J. Baxter, Corner transfer matrices of the eight-vertex model I , J. Stat. Phys. 15, 485 (1976), doi:10.1007/BF01020802

  39. [50]

    R. J. Baxter, Corner transfer matrices of the eight-vertex model II , J. Stat. Phys. 17, 1 (1977), doi:10.1007/BF01089373

  40. [51]

    R. J. Baxter, Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics , Academic Press, London, ISBN 0-12- 083180-5 (1982), https://physics.anu.edu.au/theophys/_files/Exactly.pdf

  41. [52]

    R. J. Baxter, Completeness of the Bethe Ansatz for the six and eight-vertex models, J. Stat. Phys. 108, 1 (2002), doi:10.1023/A:1015437118218

  42. [53]

    R. J. Baxter, The six and eight-vertex models revisited , J. Stat. Phys. 116, 43 (2004), doi:10.1023/B:JOSS.0000037215.07702.93

  43. [55]

    L. A. Takhtadzhan and L. D. Faddeev, The quantum method of the inverse problem and the Heisenberg XYZ model, Russ. Math. Surveys 34(5), 11 (1979), doi:10.1070/RM1979v034n05ABEH003909

  44. [56]

    Felder and A

    G. Felder and A. Varchenko, On representations of the elliptic quantum group Eτ,η(sl2), Commun. Math. Phys. 181, 741 (1996), doi:10.1007/BF02101296

  45. [57]

    Felder and A

    G. Felder and A. Varchenko, Algebraic Bethe ansatz for the elliptic quantum group Eτ,η(sl2), Nucl. Phys. B 480, 485 (1996), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00461-0, https://arxiv.org/abs/ q-alg/9605024

  46. [58]

    Felder, Elliptic quantum groups , In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematical Physics, Paris (1994), pp

    G. Felder, Elliptic quantum groups , In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematical Physics, Paris (1994), pp. 211–218. International Press, Cambridge, MA (1995), https://arxiv. org/abs/hep-th/9412207

  47. [59]

    Jimbo and T

    M. Jimbo and T. Miwa, Algebraic analysis of solvable lattice models , No. 85 in CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. AMS, Providence, RI, doi:10.1090/cbms/085 (1995)

  48. [60]

    Jimbo, K

    M. Jimbo, K. Miki, T. Miwa and A. Nakayashiki, Correlation functions of the XXZ model for ∆<−1, Phys. Lett. A 168, 256 (1992), doi:10.1016/0375-9601(92)91128-E

  49. [61]

    Jimbo and T

    M. Jimbo and T. Miwa, Quantum KZ equation with|q| = 1 and correlation functions of the XXZ model in the gapless regime, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 29, 2923 (1996), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/29/12/005

  50. [62]

    Kitanine, J

    N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet and V . Terras,Form factors of the XXZ Heisenberg spin-1/2 finite chain, Nucl. Phys. B 554, 647 (1999), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00295-3, math-ph/9807020

  51. [63]

    J. M. Maillet and V . Terras,On the quantum inverse scattering problem, Nucl. Phys. B 575, 627 (2000), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00097-3

  52. [64]

    Kitanine, J

    N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet and V . Terras, Correlation functions of the XXZ Heisenberg spin-1/2 chain in a magnetic field, Nucl. Phys. B 567, 554 (2000), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00619-7, math-ph/ 9907019. 45

  53. [65]

    Kitanine, J

    N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov and V . Terras, Spin-spin correlation functions of the XXZ- 1/2 Heisenberg chain in a magnetic field , Nucl. Phys. B 641, 487 (2002), doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(02)00583-7, hep-th/0201045

  54. [66]

    Kitanine, J

    N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov and V . Terras, Master equation for spin-spin correlation functions of the XXZ chain , Nucl. Phys. B 712, 600 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.01.050, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0406190

  55. [67]

    Kitanine, J

    N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov and V . Terras, Dynamical correlation functions of the XXZ spin-1/2 chain, Nucl. Phys. B 729, 558 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.08.046, https:// arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0407108

  56. [68]

    Kitanine, K

    N. Kitanine, K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov and V . Terras, On correlation functions of integrable models associated with the six-vertex R-matrix , J. Stat. Mech. 2007, P01022 (2007), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2007/01/P01022

  57. [69]

    L. D. Faddeev and E. K. Sklyanin, Quantum-mechanical approach to completely integrable field theory models, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 23, 902 (1978), doi:10.1142/9789814340960_0025

  58. [70]

    E. K. Sklyanin, L. A. Takhtadzhyan and L. D. Faddeev, Quantum inverse problem method I , Theor. Math. Phys. 40, 688 (1979), doi:10.1007/BF01018718, Translated from Teor. Mat. Fiz. 40 (1979) 194-220

  59. [71]

    Göhmann and V

    F. Göhmann and V . E. Korepin, Solution of the quantum inverse problem, J. Phys. A 33, 1199 (2000), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/33/6/308

  60. [72]

    N. A. Slavnov, Calculation of scalar products of wave functions and form factors in the framework of the algebraic Bethe Ansatz, Theor. Math. Phys. 79, 502 (1989), doi:10.1007/BF01016531

  61. [75]

    Kitanine, Correlation functions of the higher spin XXX chains , J

    N. Kitanine, Correlation functions of the higher spin XXX chains , J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 8151 (2001), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/39/314

  62. [76]

    Deguchi, Reduction formula of form factors for the integrable spin-s XXZ chains and application to correlation functions, J

    T. Deguchi, Reduction formula of form factors for the integrable spin-s XXZ chains and application to correlation functions, J. Stat. Mech. 2012, P04001 (2012), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2012/04/P04001

  63. [77]

    Levy-Bencheton and V

    D. Levy-Bencheton and V . Terras, An algebraic Bethe ansatz approach to form factors and correlation functions of the cyclic eight-vertex solid-on-solid model, J. Stat. Mech. 2013, P04015 (2013), https: //arxiv.org/abs/1212.0246

  64. [78]

    Levy-Bencheton and V

    D. Levy-Bencheton and V . Terras, Spontaneous staggered polarisations of the cyclic solid-on-solid model from algebraic Bethe Ansatz , J. Stat. Mech. 2013, P10012 (2013), https://arxiv.org/ abs/1304.7814

  65. [79]

    Levy-Bencheton and V

    D. Levy-Bencheton and V . Terras, Multi-point local height probabilities of the CSOS model within the algebraic bethe ansatz framework , J. Stat. Mech. 2014, P04014 (2014), https://arxiv.org/ abs/1311.7692

  66. [81]

    H. Boos, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, F. Smirnov and Y . Takeyama, Reduced qKZ equation and correlation functions of the XXZ model, Comm. Math. Phys. pp. 245–276 (2006), doi:10.1007/s00220-005-1430-6

  67. [82]

    H. Boos, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, F. Smirnov and Y . Takeyama, Density matrix of a finite sub-chain of the Heisenberg anti-ferromagnet, Lett. Math. Phys. 75, 201 (2006), doi:10.1007/s11005-006-0054-x

  68. [83]

    H. Boos, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, F. Smirnov and Y . Takeyama, Algebraic representation of correlation functions in integrable spin chains, Annales Henri Poincaré 7, 1395 (2006), doi:10.1007/s00023-006- 0285-5

  69. [84]

    H. Boos, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, F. Smirnov and Y . Takeyama, A recursion formula for the correlation functions of an inhomogeneous XXX model, St. Petersburg Math. J. 17, 85 (2006)

  70. [85]

    H. Boos, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, F. Smirnov and Y . Takeyama, Hidden Grassmann structure in the XXZ model, Comm. Math. Phys. 272, 263 (2007), doi:10.1007/s00220-007-0202-x

  71. [86]

    H. Boos, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, F. Smirnov and Y . Takeyama, Hidden Grassmann Structure in the XXZ Model II: Creation Operators, Comm. Math. Phys. 286, 875 (2009), doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0617-z

  72. [87]

    Jimbo, T

    M. Jimbo, T. Miwa and F. Smirnov, Hidden Grassmann structure in the XXZ model III: introducing the Matsubara direction, J. Phys. A : Math. Gen.42, 304018 (2009), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/30/304018

  73. [88]

    Jimbo, T

    M. Jimbo, T. Miwa and F. Smirnov, Hidden Grassmann Structure in the XXZ Model V: Sine-Gordon Model, Lett. Math. Phys. 96, 325 (2011), doi:10.1007/s11005-010-0438-9

  74. [89]

    Mestyán and B

    M. Mestyán and B. Pozsgay, Short distance correlators in the XXZ spin chain for arbitrary string distributions, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2014(9), P09020 (2014), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/09/p09020

  75. [90]

    Pozsgay, Excited state correlations of the finite Heisenberg chain, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50(7), 074006 (2017), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa5344

    B. Pozsgay, Excited state correlations of the finite Heisenberg chain, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50(7), 074006 (2017), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa5344

  76. [91]

    Kitanine, K

    N. Kitanine, K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov and V . Terras,Riemann-Hilbert approach to a generalized sine kernel and applications, Comm. Math. Phys. 291, 691 (2009), doi:10.1007/s00220- 009-0878-1

  77. [92]

    Kitanine, K

    N. Kitanine, K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov and V . Terras, Algebraic Bethe ansatz approach to the asymptotic behavior of correlation functions , J. Stat. Mech. 2009, P04003 (2009), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2009/04/P04003

  78. [93]

    Kitanine, K

    N. Kitanine, K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov and V . Terras, On the thermodynamic limit of form factors in the massless XXZ Heisenberg chain , J. Math. Phys. 50, 095209 (2009), doi:10.1063/1.3136683

  79. [94]

    K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet and N. A. Slavnov, Long-distance behavior of temperature cor- relation functions of the quantum one-dimensional Bose gas , J. Stat. Mech. 2011, P03018 (2011), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2011/03/P03018, https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.3149

  80. [95]

    K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet and N. A. Slavnov, Correlation functions for one-dimensional bosons at low temperature, J. Stat. Mech. 2011, P03019 (2011), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2011/03/P03019

  81. [96]

    K. K. Kozlowski and V . Terras,Long-time and large-distance asymptotic behavior of the current-current correlators in the non-linear Schrödinger model, J. Stat. Mech.2011, P09013 (2011), doi:10.1088/1742- 5468/2011/09/P09013, https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.0844

  82. [97]

    Kitanine, K

    N. Kitanine, K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov and V . Terras, The thermodynamic limit of particle-hole form factors in the massless XXZ Heisenberg chain , J. Stat. Mech. 2011, P05028 (2011), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2011/05/P05028. 47

  83. [98]

    Kitanine, K

    N. Kitanine, K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov and V . Terras, A form factor approach to the asymptotic behavior of correlation functions in critical models, J. Stat. Mech. 2011, P12010 (2011), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2011/12/P12010, https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0803

  84. [99]

    Kitanine, K

    N. Kitanine, K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov and V . Terras, Form factor approach to dy- namical correlation functions in critical models, J. Stat. Mech. 2012, P09001 (2012), doi:10.1088/1742- 5468/2012/09/P09001, https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2630

  85. [100]

    Dugave, F

    M. Dugave, F. Göhmann and K. K. Kozlowski, Thermal form factors of the XXZ chain and the large- distance asymptotics of its temperature dependent correlation functions , J. Stat. Mech. 2013, P07010 (2013), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2013/07/p07010

  86. [101]

    Kitanine, K

    N. Kitanine, K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet and V . Terras, Large-distance asymptotic behaviour of multi-point correlation functions in massless quantum models , J. Stat. Mech. 2014, P05011 (2014), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/05/P05011

  87. [102]

    Kenzelmann, R

    M. Kenzelmann, R. Coldea, D. A. Tennant, D. Visser, M. Hofmann, P. Smeibidl and Z. Tylczynski, Order-to-disorder transition in theXY-like quantum magnetcs2cocl4 induced by noncommuting applied fields, Phys. Rev. B 65, 144432 (2002), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.144432

  88. [104]

    J. S. Caux and J. M. Maillet, Computation of dynamical correlation functions of Heisenberg chains in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 077201 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.077201

  89. [105]

    R. G. Pereira, J. Sirker, J.-S. Caux, R. Hagemans, J. M. Maillet, S. R. White and I. Affleck, Dynamical spin structure factor for the anisotropic spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 257202 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.257202

  90. [106]

    Göhmann, A

    F. Göhmann, A. Klümper and A. Seel, Integral representations for correlation functions of the XXZ chain at finite temperature, J. Phys. A 37, 7625 (2004), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/31/001, https: //arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0405089

  91. [107]

    Göhmann, A

    F. Göhmann, A. Klümper and A. Seel, Integral representation of the density matrix of the XXZ chain at finite temperatures, J. Phys. A : Math. Gen. 38, 1833 (2005), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/9/001

  92. [108]

    H. E. Boos, F. Göhmann, A. Klümper and J. Suzuki, Factorization of the finite temperature correlation functions of the XXZ chain in a magnetic field , Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40(35), 10699 (2007), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/35/001

  93. [109]

    Göhmann and J

    F. Göhmann and J. Suzuki, Quantum spin chains at finite temperatures , In New Trends in Quantum Integrable Systems, pp. 81–100, doi:10.1142/9789814324373_0005 (2010)

  94. [110]

    Göhmann, A

    F. Göhmann, A. Seel and J. Suzuki, Correlation functions of the integrable isotropic spin-1 chain at finite temperature, J. Stat. Mech. 2010, P11011 (2010), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2010/11/P11011

  95. [111]

    Dugave, F

    M. Dugave, F. Göhmann, K. K. Kozlowski and J. Suzuki, Low-temperature spectrum of correlation lengths of the XXZ chain in the antiferromagnetic massive regime, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 48(33), 334001 (2015), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/33/334001

  96. [112]

    Göhmann, M

    F. Göhmann, M. Karbach, A. Klümper, K. K. Kozlowski and J. Suzuki, Thermal form-factor approach to dynamical correlation functions of integrable lattice models, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2017(11), 113106 (2017), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/aa967

  97. [113]

    Lashkevich and Y

    M. Lashkevich and Y . Pugai, Free Field Construction for Correlation Functions of the Eight-Vertex Model, Nucl. Phys. B516, 623 (1998), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00086-8, https://arxiv. org/abs/hep-th/9710099. 48

  98. [114]

    Lashkevich and Y

    M. Lashkevich and Y . Pugai, Nearest neighbor two-point correlation function of the Z-invariant eight- vertex model, JETP Lett. 68, 257 (1998), doi:10.1134/1.567856

  99. [115]

    Hara, Correlation functions of the XYZ model with a boundary , Nuclear Physics B 572(3), 574 (2000), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00787-7

    Y . Hara, Correlation functions of the XYZ model with a boundary , Nuclear Physics B 572(3), 574 (2000), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00787-7

  100. [116]

    Lashkevich, Free field construction for the eight-vertex model: Representation for form factors , Nucl

    M. Lashkevich, Free field construction for the eight-vertex model: Representation for form factors , Nucl. Phys. B621, 587 (2002), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00598-3, https://arxiv.org/abs/ hep-th/0103144

  101. [117]

    Lukyanov and Y

    S. Lukyanov and Y . Pugai, Multi-point local height probabilities in the integrable RSOS model , Nucl. Phys. B 473, 631 (1996), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00221-0

  102. [118]

    Slavnov, A

    N. Slavnov, A. Zabrodin and A. Zotov, Scalar products of Bethe vectors in the 8-vertex model , JHEP 06, 123 (2020), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)123

  103. [119]

    Kulkarni and N

    G. Kulkarni and N. A. Slavnov, Scalar products of Bethe vectors in the generalized algebraic Bethe ansatz, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 217(1), 1574 (2023), doi:10.1134/S0040577923100100, ArXiv:2306.12932

  104. [120]

    Kulkarni and N

    G. Kulkarni and N. A. Slavnov, Form factors of local operators in the generalized algebraic Bethe ansatz, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 21(2), 1940 (2024), doi:10.1134/S0040577924110102

  105. [121]

    J. M. Maillet and G. Niccoli, On quantum separation of variables , Journal of Mathematical Physics 59(9), 091417 (2018), doi:10.1063/1.5050989

  106. [122]

    E. K. Sklyanin, Boundary conditions for integrable quantum systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 21, 2375 (1988), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/21/10/015

  107. [123]

    Ghoshal and A

    S. Ghoshal and A. Zamolodchikov, Boundary S-matrix and boundary state in two-dimensional inte- grable quantum field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9, 3841 (1994), doi:10.1142/S0217751X94001552

  108. [124]

    Jimbo, R

    M. Jimbo, R. Kedem, T. Kojima, H. Konno and T. Miwa, XXZ chain with a boundary , Nucl. Phys. B 441, 437 (1995), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00062-W

  109. [125]

    Jimbo, R

    M. Jimbo, R. Kedem, H. Konno, T. Miwa and R. Weston, Difference equations in spin chains with a boundary, Nucl. Phys. B 448, 429 (1995), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00218-H

  110. [126]

    Fan, B.-Y

    H. Fan, B.-Y . Hou, K.-J. Shi and Z.-X. Yang,Algebraic Bethe ansatz for the eight-vertex model with gen- eral open boundary conditions, Nucl. Phys. B 478(3), 723 (1996), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00398-7

  111. [127]

    R. I. Nepomechie, Solving the open XXZ spin chain with nondiagonal boundary terms at roots of unity, Nucl. Phys. B 622, 615 (2002), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00585-5

  112. [128]

    R. I. Nepomechie, Bethe ansatz solution of the open XXZ chain with nondiagonal boundary terms , J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37, 433 (2004), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/2/012

  113. [129]

    Cao, H.-Q

    J. Cao, H.-Q. Lin, K.-J. Shi and Y . Wang, Exact solution of XXZ spin chain with unparallel boundary fields, Nucl. Phys. B 663, 487 (2003), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00372-9

  114. [130]

    Yang and Y .-Z

    W.-L. Yang and Y .-Z. Zhang, On the second reference state and complete eigenstates of the open XXZ chain, JHEP 2007(4), 044 (2007), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/04/044

  115. [131]

    Baseilhac, The q-deformed analogue of the Onsager algebra: Beyond the Bethe ansatz approach , Nucl

    P. Baseilhac, The q-deformed analogue of the Onsager algebra: Beyond the Bethe ansatz approach , Nucl. Phys. B 754, 309 (2006), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.08.008

  116. [132]

    Baseilhac and K

    P. Baseilhac and K. Koizumi, Exact spectrum of the XXZ open spin chain from the q-Onsager algebra representation theory, J. Stat. Mech. 2007, P09006 (2007), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2007/09/P09006

  117. [133]

    Baseilhac and S

    P. Baseilhac and S. Belliard, The half-infinite XXZ chain in Onsager’s approach, Nucl. Phys. B 873(3), 550 (2013), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.05.003. 49

  118. [134]

    Baseilhac and S

    P. Baseilhac and S. Belliard, Non-Abelian symmetries of the half-infinite XXZ spin chain, Nucl. Phys. B 916, 373 (2017), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.01.012

  119. [135]

    Crampé, E

    N. Crampé, E. Ragoucy and D. Simon, Eigenvectors of open XXZ and ASEP models for a class of non-diagonal boundary conditions , J. Stat. Mech. 2010, P11038 (2010), doi:10.1088/1742- 5468/2010/11/P11038

  120. [136]

    Crampé, E

    N. Crampé, E. Ragoucy and D. Simon, Matrix coordinate Bethe Ansatz: applications to XXZ and ASEP models, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 405003 (2011), doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/40/405003

  121. [137]

    Filali and N

    G. Filali and N. Kitanine, Spin chains with non-diagonal boundaries and trigonometric SOS model with reflecting end, SIGMA 7, 012 (2011), doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2011.012

  122. [138]

    Cao, W.-L

    J. Cao, W.-L. Yang, K. Shi and Y . Wang, Off-diagonal Bethe ansatz solutions of the anisotropic spin-1/2 chains with arbitrary boundary fields , Nucl. Phys. B 877, 152 (2013), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.10.001

  123. [139]

    Belliard and N

    S. Belliard and N. Crampé, Heisenberg XXX model with general boundaries: Eigenvectors from alge- braic Bethe ansatz, SIGMA 9, 072 (2013), doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2013.072

  124. [140]

    Belliard, Modified algebraic Bethe ansatz for XXZ chain on the segment - I - Triangular cases, Nucl

    S. Belliard, Modified algebraic Bethe ansatz for XXZ chain on the segment - I - Triangular cases, Nucl. Phys. B 892, 1 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.01.003

  125. [141]

    Belliard and R

    S. Belliard and R. A. Pimenta, Modified algebraic Bethe ansatz for XXZ chain on the segment - II - general cases, Nucl. Phys. B 894, 527 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.03.016

  126. [142]

    Belliard and R

    S. Belliard and R. A. Pimenta, Slavnov and Gaudin-Korepin formulas for models without U(1) symmetry: the twisted XXX chain , Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications (2015), doi:10.3842/sigma.2015.099

  127. [143]

    J. Avan, S. Belliard, N. Grosjean and R. Pimenta, Modified algebraic Bethe ansatz for XXZ chain on the segment – III – Proof, Nucl. Phys. B 899, 229 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.08.006

  128. [144]

    Belliard and R

    S. Belliard and R. A. Pimenta, Slavnov and Gaudin-Korepin formulas for models without U(1) symme- try: the XXX chain on the segment , J. Phys A: Math. Theor. 49, 17LT01 (2016), doi:10.1088/1751- 8113/49/17/17LT01

  129. [145]

    Grijalva, J

    S. Grijalva, J. De Nardis and V . Terras, Open XXZ chain and boundary modes at zero temperature , SciPost Phys. 7, 23 (2019), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.2.023

  130. [146]

    Y . Qiao, J. Cao, W.-L. Yang, K. Shi and Y . Wang, Exact surface energy and helical spinons in the XXZ spin chain with arbitrary nondiagonal boundary fields , Phys. Rev. B 103(22), L220401 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L220401

  131. [147]

    Z. Xin, J. Cao, W.-L. Yang and Y . Wang, Surface energy and elementary excitations of the XYZ spin chain with integrable open boundary fields , Journal of High Energy Physics 2024(10), 90 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)090

  132. [148]

    de Gier and F

    J. de Gier and F. H. L. Essler, Bethe ansatz solution of the asymmetric exclusion process with open boundaries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 240601 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.240601

  133. [149]

    Prosen, Open XXZ spin chain: Nonequilibrium steady state and a strict bound on ballistic transport, Phys

    T. Prosen, Open XXZ spin chain: Nonequilibrium steady state and a strict bound on ballistic transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 217206 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.217206

  134. [150]

    E. K. Sklyanin, Method of the inverse scattering problem and the non-linear quantum Schrödinger equation, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 24, 107 (1979)

  135. [151]

    E. K. Sklyanin, On complete integrability of the Landau-Lifshitz equation , Preprint LOMI E-3-79 (1979). 50

  136. [152]

    L. D. Faddeev and L. A. Takhtajan, Quantum inverse scattering method, Sov. Sci. Rev. Math. C 1, 107 (1981)

  137. [153]

    E. K. Sklyanin, Quantum version of the inverse scattering problem method. , J. Sov. Math. 19, 1546 (1982), doi:10.1007/BF01091462

  138. [154]

    L. D. Faddeev, Integrable models in (1 + 1)-dimensional quantum field theory , In J. B. Zuber and R. Stora, eds., Les Houches 1982, Recent advances in field theory and statistical mechanics , pp. 561–

  139. [155]

    L. D. Faddeev, How algebraic Bethe ansatz works for integrable model (1996), https://arxiv. org/abs/hep-th/9605187

  140. [156]

    V . E. Korepin, N. M. Bogoliubov and A. G. Izergin, Quantum inverse scattering method and cor- relation functions, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511628832 (1993)

  141. [157]

    Ryan and D

    P. Ryan and D. V olin, Separated variables and wave functions for rational gl(n) spin chains in the companion twist frame, Journal of Mathematical Physics 60(3), 032701 (2019), doi:10.1063/1.5085387

  142. [158]

    J. M. Maillet and G. Niccoli, On separation of variables for reflection algebras , Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2019(9), 094020 (2019), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ab357a

  143. [159]

    Niccoli and J

    G. Niccoli and J. M. Maillet, On quantum separation of variables beyond fundamental representations, SciPost Phys. 10, 26 (2021), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.2.026

  144. [160]

    J. M. Maillet and G. Niccoli, Complete spectrum of quantum integrable lattice models associated to Y(gl(n)) by separation of variables, SciPost Phys. 6, 71 (2019), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.6.071

  145. [161]

    J. M. Maillet and G. Niccoli, Complete spectrum of quantum integrable lattice models associated to Uq(gˆln) by separation of variables, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52(31), 315203 (2019), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab2930

  146. [162]

    J. M. Maillet, G. Niccoli and L. Vignoli, Separation of variables bases for integrable glM|N and Hubbard models, SciPost Physics 9(4) (2020), doi:10.21468/scipostphys.9.4.060

  147. [163]

    Ryan and D

    P. Ryan and D. V olin, Separation of variables for rational gl(n) spin chains in any compact represen- tation, via fusion, embedding morphism and Bäcklund flow , Communications in Mathematical Physics 383(1), 311 (2021), doi:10.1007/s00220-021-03990-7

  148. [164]

    Faldella and G

    S. Faldella and G. Niccoli, SOV approach for integrable quantum models associated with general rep- resentations on spin-1/2 chains of the 8-vertex reflection algebra, J. Phys. A : Math. Theor. 47, 115202 (2014), doi:0.1088/1751-8113/47/11/115202

  149. [165]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press, seventh edn. (2007)

  150. [166]

    Inami and H

    T. Inami and H. Konno, Integrable XYZ spin chain with boundaries, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 27(24), L913 (1994), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/27/24/002

  151. [167]

    Hou, K.-J

    B.-Y . Hou, K.-J. Shi, H. Fan and Z.-X. Yang, Solution of reflection equation , Commun. Theor. Phys. 23(2), 163 (1995), doi:10.1088/0253-6102/23/2/163

  152. [168]

    I. V . Cherednik,Factorizing particles on a half line and root systems, Theor. Math. Phys.61, 977 (1984), doi:10.1007/BF01038545

  153. [169]

    R. J. Baxter, Eight-vertex model in lattice statistics and one-dimensional anisotropic Heisenberg chain I, II, III, Ann. Phys. 76, 1 (1973), doi:10.1016/0003-4916(73)90439-9

  154. [170]

    J. L. Gervais and A. Neveu, Novel triangle relation and abscence of tachions in Liouville string field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 238, 125 (1984), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90469-3. 51

  155. [172]

    R. I. Nepomechie and F. Ravanini, Completeness of the Bethe Ansatz solution of the open XXZ chain with nondiagonal boundary terms , J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36(45), 11391 (2003), doi:10.1088/0305- 4470/36/45/003

  156. [173]

    R. I. Nepomechie and F. Ravanini, Addendum to Completeness of the Bethe Ansatz solution of the open XXZ chain with nondiagonal boundary terms , J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37(5), 1945 (2004), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/5/030

  157. [174]

    Kapustin and S

    A. Kapustin and S. Skorik, Surface excitations and surface energy of the antiferromagnetic XXZ chain by the Bethe ansatz approach, J. Phys. A 29, 1629 (1996), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/29/8/011

  158. [175]

    Cao, W.-L

    J. Cao, W.-L. Yang, K. Shi and Y . Wang,Off-diagonal Bethe ansatz and exact solution of a topological spin ring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 137201 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.137201

  159. [176]

    Cao, W.-L

    J. Cao, W.-L. Yang, K. Shi and Y . Wang, Nested off-diagonal Bethe ansatz and exact so- lutions of the su(n) spin chain with generic integrable boundaries , JHEP 04, 143 (2014), doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)143. 52

  160. [608]

    Elsevier Science Publ. (1984)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.