Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

OneShield -- the Next Generation of LLM Guardrails

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.21170 v2 pith:2SFTMJH4 submitted 2025-07-25 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords oneshieldllmsmodelspotentialriskssafetysolutionsactors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rise of Large Language Models has created a general excitement about the great potential for a myriad of applications. While LLMs offer many possibilities, questions about safety, privacy, and ethics have emerged, and all the key actors are working to address these issues with protective measures for their own models and standalone solutions. The constantly evolving nature of LLMs makes it extremely challenging to universally shield users against their potential risks, and one-size-fits-all solutions are unfeasible. In this work, we propose OneShield, our stand-alone, model-agnostic and customizable solution to safeguard LLMs. OneShield aims to provide facilities for defining risk factors, expressing and declaring contextual safety and compliance policies, and mitigating LLM risks, with a focus on each specific customer. We describe the implementation of the framework, discuss scalability considerations, and provide usage statistics of OneShield since its initial deployment.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion

    cs.CY 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    This paper proposes a taxonomy of LLM harms in five categories and suggests mitigation strategies plus a dynamic auditing system for responsible development.

  2. LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion

    cs.CY 2025-12 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Proposes a five-bucket taxonomy of LLM harms and calls for dynamic auditing, but the systematic review behind it is not reproducible and contains mismatched citations.

Pith tools