BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors

Rui Santos; Tania Robens

BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Extended Higgs sectors remain plausible answers for dark matter, CP violation, and the matter-antimatter asymmetry, but current data now confines them to narrow corners of parameter space.

desk verdict A solid, explicitly scoped encyclopedia-style review of extended scalar sectors: nothing new, but useful as a reference; two peripheral editorial slips and a stated leading-order scope are the only caveats. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21910 v2 pith:LIYSCNBH submitted 2025-07-29 hep-ph

Tania Robens , Rui Santos This is my paper

classification hep-ph

keywords extendedscalarsectorsHiggssectortwo-Higgs-doubletmodelsingletextensiondarkmatterCPviolationelectroweakphasetransitioncollidersearches

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This encyclopedia entry argues that adding new spin-zero fields to the one Higgs doublet of the Standard Model is still a viable route to solving some of the model's open puzzles, notably dark matter, the baryon asymmetry, and neutrino masses. It shows that any such extension must pass a long list of theoretical and experimental constraints, from vacuum stability to electric dipole moments, and maps which parameter regions survive in the most studied model classes. For sympathetic readers, the central message is that the 125 GeV scalar measurements already limit the extra scalars' couplings through a simple sum rule, yet meaningful room remains for discovery at current and planned colliders.

What carries the argument

The central object is the extended scalar potential written in terms of additional singlet, doublet, or higher-representation fields, together with an imposed symmetry such as a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ that stabilizes a dark-matter candidate or enforces natural flavor conservation. The load-bearing identity is the sum rule that the squared couplings of all neutral scalars to electroweak gauge bosons add up to the Standard Model value, which turns precise measurements of the 125 GeV state into direct bounds on mixing angles. For CP-violating sectors, the key probe is the triple-scalar vertex $h_i h_j Z$ and the associated loop-induced CP-violating form factor in the $ZZZ$ vertex, while for dark matter the portal coupling $\kappa_{HS} H^\dagger H S^2$ controls relic density, direct detection, and collider signatures.

What would settle it

A concrete test would be to recompute any of the paper's allowed benchmark points at next-to-leading order, including full renormalization of the extended scalar potential, and check whether the allowed region survives; a measurement of the 125 GeV couplings that violates the scalar coupling sum rule in a way no renormalizable extension can accommodate would also falsify the entire class of models.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review's central claim is that extended scalar sectors remain realistic explanations for dark matter and CP violation, but the available parameter space is tightly bounded by the combined constraints of vacuum stability, perturbative unitarity, electroweak precision data, flavor measurements, dark-matter searches, electric dipole moments, and direct collider searches. The paper systematically applies these constraints to singlet extensions, two-Higgs-doublet models with and without CP violation, and dark-matter models with portals to a hidden sector. In the minimal real-singlet dark-matter model, for example, only the Higgs-resonance region and a high-mass region above a few TeV survive. In CP-violating two-doublet models, the electron electric dipole moment is the dominant constraint and can leave only small islands of allowed parameter space that are nevertheless testable at the high-luminosity LHC.

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes that a renormalizable theory with only dimension-four operators, evaluated at leading order in perturbation theory, is sufficient to decide which parameter regions are viable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any viable extension must contain a 125 GeV scalar whose gauge couplings are close to Standard Model values, so mixing angles such as $\sin\alpha$ or $\cos(\beta-\alpha)$ are already limited by signal-strength measurements.
The minimal real-singlet dark-matter model is reduced to two surviving regions: one near half the Higgs mass and one above roughly 3.5 TeV, with the exact boundaries coming from relic density, direct detection, and Higgs invisible width.
In CP-violating two-doublet models, the electron electric dipole moment eliminates most parameter space, and the remaining points can be probed through angular correlations in $h_{125}\to\tau\bar{\tau}$ and through the CP-violating $ZZZ$ form factor.
Adding more dark-sector scalars relieves the tension between relic density and direct detection by splitting the dark-matter fraction or by introducing additional portal couplings that allow a small direct-detection rate with a large annihilation rate.
Future colliders, through scalar-strahlung, di-Higgs, and vector-boson-fusion channels, can probe the remaining open regions and test the Higgs self-coupling modifications associated with a strong first-order electroweak phase transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the next LHC run finds no new scalars, the viable parameter space will shift toward heavier, nearly degenerate spectra or toward feebly interacting dark sectors where freeze-in produces the relic density.
The review's restriction to dimension-four operators and leading-order perturbation theory means the precise edges of the allowed regions should be treated as leading-order statements rather than final verdicts.
A future gravitational-wave signal from a first-order electroweak phase transition would single out extended scalar sectors with specific potential barriers, providing a cosmological counterpart to collider searches.
The two-region structure of the singlet dark-matter model is a concrete prediction: a direct-detection signal in the middle mass range would falsify this minimal freeze-out picture, while a signal only at high mass would point to richer dark sectors.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Updated encyclopedia chapter, not a research paper. No new equations, models, or derived results; the tagline and the reference list make that clear. What the chapter does well is gather the standard material: the constraint list (EWPO, flavor, EDM, DM, LHC searches), the singlet and 2HDM basics, the DM discussion, the list of public codes, and current experimental summary plots. A newcomer could use it as a quick map, and the tool list alone has value.

The reader is right to leave it unverdictable. There is no central claim to referee. The renormalizable/leading-order scope is stated twice and not hidden; the text even names places where higher-order corrections matter (pseudo-Goldstone DM, electron EDM, electroweak phase transitions), so the weakest-assumption flag is really a disclosure, not a flaw.

The soft spots are minor and peripheral. Section 9 says a real gauge singlet is enough for EWBG; as written that is imprecise, because EWBG also needs a new CP-violating source, and the paper's own conclusions say CP violation needs at least one extra doublet unless fermions are added. And the Figure 6 caption contradicts itself on the alpha_h_tau_tau bound, saying it is included in the right panel and then saying it is not applied in either plot. Both are editorial slips in remarks, not in the physics summaries.

There are also typos and production artifacts throughout, including what look like corrupted unicode labels in Figure 4 and 'neural' for 'neutral.' None of that touches the substance.

Who gets value: students, experimentalists, and theorists outside the scalar-sector niche who want a current orientation and a pointer to the tools. It is not a source of new constraints or methods.

I would send it to a referee rather than desk-reject, because for a review chapter the value is in accuracy, and the accuracy holds up except for easily fixable slips. A minor-revision verdict seems right.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This invited review chapter surveys extensions of the Standard Model scalar sector by additional spin-0 fields. After stating a scope of renormalizable theories (operators of dimension ≤ 4) and mostly leading-order perturbative calculations, it reviews the standard theoretical constraints (vacuum stability, perturbative unitarity, perturbativity) and experimental constraints (EWPOs, particle widths, flavor observables, LHC measurements, dark matter observables, EDMs). It then summarizes real/complex singlet extensions, CP-conserving and CP-violating 2HDMs, more general scalar representations, scalar dark matter models (including CP-violating dark sectors), current LHC status and future collider options, connections to electroweak phase transitions and gravitational waves, and public computational tools. The central message is that extended scalar sectors remain viable explanations for dark matter and new sources of CP violation and are already strongly constrained by current data, with more parameter space to be probed at the HL-LHC and future facilities.

Significance. The chapter is a competent and useful reference for entering the field. Its strengths are the breadth of the constraint list, the up-to-date selection of experimental summary plots (ATLAS/CMS, LEP, Planck), the detailed inventory of public tools, and the explicit disclosure of the review's theoretical scope. The renormalizability and leading-order limitations are stated rather than hidden, and the text notes important exceptions where higher-order computations are required (pseudo-Goldstone DM direct detection, C2HDM EDM calculations, gluon-fusion Higgs production). Several figures are taken from the authors' own previous papers, but this is clearly a matter of provenance and not circular reasoning, since the chapter makes no new claim that those figures are used to prove. I find no load-bearing technical error in the central survey. The issues listed below are localized presentation and consistency problems, so the appropriate outcome is a minor revision.

minor comments (5)

[Section 9] The sentence 'the addition of a real gauge singlet is enough for EWBG [246]' is inaccurate: a real singlet can strengthen the electroweak phase transition and provide a strong first-order transition, but electroweak baryogenesis also requires a new source of CP violation beyond the Standard Model. This statement is also internally inconsistent with the Conclusion, which correctly notes that CP violation needs at least one extra doublet unless extra fermions are added. Please rephrase, e.g. 'a real gauge singlet can make the electroweak phase transition strongly first order, a necessary ingredient for EWBG'.
[Figure 6 caption] The caption first says that the right panel includes the limit αhττ < 41° while the left panel does not, but the final sentence of the same caption states that this limit 'has not been applied in either of the plots in this figure.' The text after the figure also says the right plot applies the limit. Please resolve this contradiction and ensure the adjacent text agrees with the corrected caption.
[Figure 13 left caption] The caption says 'Projected sensitivity of a 250 GeV LHC' in the left panel; the surrounding text and the right panel refer to the ILC. Please change to '250 GeV ILC' (or the appropriate Higgs factory).
[Section 3, Eq. (4)] Equation (4) labels ΓH as one of the free parameters determining the phenomenology, but the text immediately gives ΓH(mH) as a function of sin²α and model couplings. Since ΓH is a derived quantity, please either remove it from the list of free parameters or clarify that the list collects the phenomenologically relevant inputs after solving the potential.
[Throughout] There are numerous small typos and grammar slips that should be cleaned up in a proofreading pass, e.g. 'is build' (Section 1), 'vacuum expecation value' (Section 3), 'freze-out' (Section 6), and '2HMDa' (Figure 12 caption).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the chapter is a review that compiles external experimental and computational constraints; self-cited figures are provenance, not load-bearing inputs, and no prediction is fitted from its own target.

full rationale

This is an explicitly scoped review chapter, not an original derivation. Its central claim that extended scalar sectors remain viable and testable is supported by external LHC searches, flavor and EDM measurements, and public codes such as HiggsTools, micrOMEGAs, and ScannerS, none of which are generated by the review itself. The authors' own prior works are used mainly as sources of illustrative figures (e.g., Figure 7 taken from [143], Figure 11 taken from [68], and Figure 6 from [93]); these are disclosures of provenance rather than load-bearing arguments. The stated limitations, such as restricting to operators of dimension ≤ 4 (Section 1) and leading-order perturbation theory (Section 2), are explicit assumptions, not hidden inputs; the text even notes cases where higher-order effects matter (pseudo-Goldstone DM in Section 6, eEDM in the C2HDM in Section 4.2). No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then presented as a prediction of a closely related quantity. No uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives. The only noteworthy issues are editorial: Section 9 states that a real singlet is enough for electroweak baryogenesis, while the Conclusions later require an extra doublet for CP violation, and the Figure 6 caption contains contradictory statements about whether the αhττ < 41° limit is applied. These are internal inconsistencies in peripheral statements, not circular reasoning, because neither step defines its conclusion into its premises. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited with a quote and a specific equation-level reduction, and the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Since the paper is a review, the ledger contains assumptions that frame the survey rather than new free parameters or entities. The free parameters of the models themselves (mixing angles, masses, portal couplings) are taken from the primary literature and are not introduced by this chapter.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The Standard Model with one Higgs doublet is the correct low-energy theory, and the 125 GeV state is the (at least approximate) SM-like Higgs.
Framing throughout Sections 1, 2, and 7 relies on the SM gauge group and the 125 GeV resonance as the benchmark.
domain assumption Renormalizable, perturbative, dimension ≤ 4 effective description is sufficient at leading order.
Stated in Section 1 and 2; the review explicitly excludes higher-dimensional operators and higher-order corrections from its summary.
standard math Standard quantum field theory tools (unitarity, vacuum stability, RGE running) apply to the models discussed.
Theoretical constraints in Section 2 are based on these tools.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LIYSCNBH

@misc{pith2026250721910,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LIYSCNBH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21910}
}

read the original abstract

In particle physics the world is described by a function, the Lagrangian. Each of its sectors characterizes the interactions between the particles of the Standard Model (SM). The addition of hypothetical new particles is done by including new terms in the Lagrangian. The scalar or Higgs sector of the SM is built with only one scalar complex field and it is extended by including new spin zero fields. This can help to solve questions that cannot be answered by the SM alone, like introducing dark matter candidates or new sources of CP-violation required to explain the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe. The corresponding theories have to be probed experimentally. For the high energy region, the standard tools are collider experiments such as the Large Hadron Collider, or other possible future facilities. Dark matter experiments scrutinize the connection between the visible and the dark world.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21910 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** combined limits at 95% CL, 500 fb ≠ 1 @250GeV 10 LEP, Φ ➞bb, observed limit ILC, recoil method ILC, Φ ➞bb HL-LHC: indirect sensitivity m 𝜙/GeV HL-LHC ILC HL-LHC/ILC: indirect sensit. 20 40 60 80 100 120 [GeV] MS −4 10 −3 10 −2 10 −1 10 1 SM σ)/ τ τ → ZS)*BR(S -→ e + (e σ TRSM allowed points 2HDM allowed points MRSSM allowed points SM predictions -1 ILC, 250 GeV, 2 ab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Return of the CHAMPs: A clockwork portal to charged dark matter
hep-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A clockwork chain of U(1) gauge groups naturally generates a dark-matter electric charge of order 10^{-12}e with O(1) inputs, with the relic abundance set by resonant annihilation through TeV-scale Z' bosons.
Kinematic Riffs and Interference Effects in Triple Higgs Production in the N2HDM
hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

Interference effects and extra decay channels in N2HDM resonant triple Higgs production significantly alter kinematic distributions, limiting simplified approximations.
Interference effects in new physics searches
hep-ph 2026-01 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

Interference between new-physics resonances and Standard Model backgrounds must be included in collider searches; the review shows it can distort, enhance, or even cancel expected signals.
Low mass scalars at $e^+e^-$ colliders
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

The paper summarizes new developments in models and experimental searches for low-mass scalars at Higgs factories since prior reviews.
Low mass scalars at $e^+e^-$ colliders
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted

A concise review of low-mass scalar search prospects at e+e- Higgs factories, updating earlier reviews with recent projections and model constraints.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

[1]

Englert, R

F . Englert, R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 321–323, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.13.321

1964
[2]

Higgs, Spontaneous Symmetry Breakdown without Massless Bosons, Phys

Peter W. Higgs, Spontaneous Symmetry Breakdown without Massless Bosons, Phys. Rev. 145 (1966) 1156–1163, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev. 145.1156

doi:10.1103/physrev 1966
[3]

G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, T. W. B. Kibble, Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 585–587, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.585 1964
[4]

(ATLAS), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys

Georges Aad, et al. (ATLAS), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1–29, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020, 1207.7214

arXiv 2012
[5]

(CMS), Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys

Serguei Chatrchyan, et al. (CMS), Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30–61, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021, 1207.7235

arXiv 2012
[6]

Cvetic, M

G. Cvetic, M. Nowakowski, A. Pilaftsis, CP violation with bosons, Phys. Lett. B 301 (1993) 77–82, doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(93)90724-V, hep-ph/9301272. BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors 21

arXiv 1993
[7]

Haber, Venus Keus, Rui Santos, P-even, CP-violating signals in scalar-mediated processes, Phys

Howard E. Haber, Venus Keus, Rui Santos, P-even, CP-violating signals in scalar-mediated processes, Phys. Rev. D 106 (9) (2022) 095038, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.095038, 2206.09643

arXiv 2022
[8]

T. D. Lee, A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation, Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 1226–1239, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1226

doi:10.1103/physrevd.8.1226 1973

Show all 300 references

[9]

Marco Gersabeck, V. V. Gligorov, Nicola Serra, Experimental constraints from flavour changing processes and physics beyond the Stan- dard Model, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2107, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2107-x , 1204.5273

2012 arXiv
[10]

Glashow, Steven Weinberg, Natural Conservation Laws for Neutral Currents, Phys

Sheldon L. Glashow, Steven Weinberg, Natural Conservation Laws for Neutral Currents, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 1958, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.15.1958

1977
[11]

E. A. Paschos, Diagonal Neutral Currents, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 1966, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.1966

1977 doi
[12]

Ansgar Denner, Stefan Dittmaier, Electroweak Radiative Corrections for Collider Physics, Phys. Rept. 864 (2020) 1–163, doi: 10.1016/j. physrep.2020.04.001, 1912.06823

2020 arXiv
[13]

Https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic
[14]

Https://cms.cern/org/cms-scientific-results
[15]

A. D. Sakharov, Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5 (1967) 32–35, doi:10.1070/PU1991v034n05ABEH002497

1967 doi
[16]

P . M. Ferreira, R. Santos, A. Barroso, Stability of the tree-level vacuum in two Higgs doublet models against charge or CP spontaneous violation, Phys. Lett. B 603 (2004) 219–229, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.10.022, [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 629, 114–114 (2005)], hep-ph/ 0406231

2004 doi
[17]

Barroso, P

A. Barroso, P . M. Ferreira, R. Santos, Charge and CP symmetry breaking in two Higgs doublet models, Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 684–687, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.11.031, hep-ph/0507224

2006 arXiv
[18]

Maniatis, A

M. Maniatis, A. von Manteuffel, O. Nachtmann, F . Nagel, Stability and symmetry breaking in the general two-Higgs-doublet model, Eur. Phys. J. C 48 (2006) 805–823, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-006-0016-6 , hep-ph/0605184

2006 arXiv
[19]

Ivanov, Minkowski space structure of the Higgs potential in 2HDM

Igor P . Ivanov, Minkowski space structure of the Higgs potential in 2HDM. II. Minima, symmetries, and topology, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 015017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.015017, 0710.3490

2008 arXiv
[20]

I. P . Ivanov, Properties of the general NHDM. II. Higgs potential and its symmetries, JHEP 07 (2010) 020, doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2010)020, 1004.1802

2010 arXiv
[21]

I. P . Ivanov, C. C. Nishi, Properties of the general NHDM. I. The Orbit space, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 015014, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82. 015014, 1004.1799

2010 arXiv
[22]

Guido Altarelli, Riccardo Barbieri, Vacuum polarization effects of new physics on electroweak processes, Phys. Lett. B 253 (1991) 161– 167, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91378-9

1991 doi
[23]

Peskin, Tatsu Takeuchi, A New constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys

Michael E. Peskin, Tatsu Takeuchi, A New constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 964–967, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.964

1990 doi
[24]

Peskin, Tatsu Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys

Michael E. Peskin, Tatsu Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381–409, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 46.381

1992 doi
[25]

Maksymyk, C

I. Maksymyk, C. P . Burgess, David London, Beyond S, T and U, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 529–535, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.529, hep-ph/ 9306267

1994 doi
[26]

Henning Flacher, Martin Goebel, Johannes Haller, Andreas Hocker, Klaus Monig, Joerg Stelzer, Revisiting the Global Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model and Beyond with Gfitter, Eur. Phys. J. C 60 (2009) 543–583, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-0966-6 , [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 71,...

2009 arXiv
[27]

Johannes Haller, Andreas Hoecker, Roman Kogler, Klaus M ¨onig, J ¨org Stelzer, Status of the global electroweak fit with Gfitter in the light of new precision measurements, PoS ICHEP2022 (2022) 897, doi:10.22323/1.414.0897, 2211.07665

2022 arXiv
[28]

Navas, et al

S. Navas, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 030001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

2024 doi
[29]

Jens Erler, Global fits to electroweak data using GAPP, in: Physics at Run II: QCD and Weak Boson Physics Workshop: 2nd General Meeting 1999, hep-ph/0005084

1999 arXiv
[30]

Https://hflav.web.cern.ch/
[31]

J. F . Gunion, H. E. Haber, J. Wudka, Sum rules for Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 904–912, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.904

1991 doi
[32]

Aghanim, et al

N. Aghanim, et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 201833910, [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], 1807.06209

2020 arXiv
[33]

Roussy, et al., An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment, Science 381 (6653) (2023) adg4084, doi: 10.1126/ science.adg4084, 2212.11841

Tanya S. Roussy, et al., An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment, Science 381 (6653) (2023) adg4084, doi: 10.1126/ science.adg4084, 2212.11841

2023 arXiv
[34]

Abel, et al., Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron, Phys

C. Abel, et al., Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (8) (2020) 081803, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.081803, 2001.11966

2020 arXiv
[35]

(ATLAS), CP Properties of Higgs Boson Interactions with Top Quarks in thet¯tH and tH Processes Using H→γγ with the ATLAS Detector, Phys

Georges Aad, et al. (ATLAS), CP Properties of Higgs Boson Interactions with Top Quarks in thet¯tH and tH Processes Using H→γγ with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (6) (2020) 061802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.061802, 2004.04545

2020 arXiv
[36]

Armen Tumasyan, et al. (CMS), Analysis of the CP structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson and τ leptons in proton- proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 06 (2022) 012, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2022)012, 2110.04836

2022 arXiv
[37]

Tania Robens, Tim Stefaniak, LHC Benchmark Scenarios for the Real Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (5) (2016) 268, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4115-8 , 1601.07880

2016 arXiv
[38]

Tania Robens, Tim Stefaniak, Jonas Wittbrodt, Two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the SM: LHC phenomenology and benchmark scenar- ios, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2) (2020) 151, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7655-x , 1908.08554

2020 arXiv
[39]

de Florian, et al

D. de Florian, et al. (LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group), Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector 2/2017 (2016), doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-002, 1610.07922

2016 arXiv
[40]

Djouadi, J

A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, M. Spira, HDECAY: A Program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension, Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 (1998) 56–74, doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(97)00123-9, hep-ph/9704448

1998 arXiv
[41]

Abdelhak Djouadi, Jan Kalinowski, Margarete Muehlleitner, Michael Spira (HDECAY), HDECAY: Twenty ++ years after, Comput. Phys. Commun. 238 (2019) 214–231, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.12.010, 1801.09506

2019 arXiv
[42]

Nikolas Kauer, Claire O’Brien, Heavy Higgs signal–background interference in gg→ VV in the Standard Model plus real singlet, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 374, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3586-3 , 1502.04113

2015 arXiv
[43]

Nikolas Kauer, Claire O’Brien, Eleni Vryonidou, Interference effects for H→ W W →ℓνqq′ and H→ ZZ→ℓℓqq searches in gluon fusion at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2015) 074, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)074, 1506.01694

2015 arXiv
[44]

Dawson, I

S. Dawson, I. M. Lewis, NLO corrections to double Higgs boson production in the Higgs singlet model, Phys. Rev. D 92 (9) (2015) 094023, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.094023, 1508.05397

2015 arXiv
[45]

Marcela Carena, Zhen Liu, Marc Riembau, Probing the electroweak phase transition via enhanced di-Higgs boson production, Phys. Rev. D 97 (9) (2018) 095032, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.095032, 1801.00794. 22 BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors

2018 arXiv
[46]

Nikolas Kauer, Alexander Lind, Philipp Maierh ¨ofer, Weimin Song, Higgs interference effects at the one-loop level in the 1-Higgs-Singlet extension of the Standard Model, JHEP 07 (2019) 108, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)108, 1905.03296

2019 arXiv
[47]

Alison, et al., Higgs boson potential at colliders: Status and perspectives, Rev

J. Alison, et al., Higgs boson potential at colliders: Status and perspectives, Rev. Phys. 5 (2020) 100045, doi: 10.1016/j.revip.2020.100045, 1910.00012

2020
[48]

Lindert, Ryan Wood, Higgs interference effects in top-quark pair production in the 1HSM, JHEP 08 (2024) 112, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2024)112, 2309.16759

Andrea Banfi, Nikolas Kauer, Alexander Lind, Jonas M. Lindert, Ryan Wood, Higgs interference effects in top-quark pair production in the 1HSM, JHEP 08 (2024) 112, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2024)112, 2309.16759

2024 arXiv
[49]

Finn Feuerstake, Elina Fuchs, Tania Robens, Daniel Winterbottom, Interference effects in resonant di-Higgs production at the LHC in the Higgs singlet extension, JHEP 04 (2025) 094, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2025)094, 2409.06651

2025 arXiv
[50]

Lewis, Jacob Scott, Miguel A

Ian M. Lewis, Jacob Scott, Miguel A. Soto Alcaraz, Matthew Sullivan, Real Singlet Scalar Benchmarks in the Multi-TeV Resonance Regime (2024), 2410.08275

2024
[51]

Tania Robens, Tim Stefaniak, Status of the Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model after LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 104, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3323-y , 1501.02234

2015 arXiv
[52]

Henning Bahl, Thomas Biek ¨otter, Sven Heinemeyer, Cheng Li, Steven Paasch, Georg Weiglein, Jonas Wittbrodt, HiggsTools: BSM scalar phenomenology with new versions of HiggsBounds and HiggsSignals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 291 (2023) 108803, doi: 10.1016/j.cpc. 2023.108803, 2210.09332

2023
[53]

Lewis, Matthew Sullivan, Beyond the Standard Model effective field theory: The singlet extended Standard Model, Phys

Shekhar Adhikari, Ian M. Lewis, Matthew Sullivan, Beyond the Standard Model effective field theory: The singlet extended Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) (2021) 075027, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.075027, 2003.10449

2021 arXiv
[54]

Lane, Ian M

Samuel D. Lane, Ian M. Lewis, Matthew Sullivan, Resonant multiscalar production in the generic complex singlet model in the multi-TeV region, Phys. Rev. D 110 (5) (2024) 055017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.055017, 2403.18003

2024 arXiv
[55]

Vernon Barger, Paul Langacker, Mathew McCaskey, Michael Ramsey-Musolf, Gabe Shaughnessy, Complex Singlet Extension of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015018, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.015018, 0811.0393

2009 arXiv
[56]

P . M. Ferreira, The vacuum structure of the Higgs complex singlet-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 94 (9) (2016) 096011, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.94.096011, 1607.06101

2016 arXiv
[57]

Ramsey-Musolf, Eibun Senaha, Standard Model with a Complex Scalar Singlet: Cosmological Implications and Theoretical Considerations, Phys

Cheng-Wei Chiang, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf, Eibun Senaha, Standard Model with a Complex Scalar Singlet: Cosmological Implications and Theoretical Considerations, Phys. Rev. D 97 (1) (2018) 015005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.015005, 1707.09960

2018 arXiv
[58]

Wei Cheng, Ligong Bian, From inflation to cosmological electroweak phase transition with a complex scalar singlet, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2) (2018) 023524, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023524, 1801.00662

2018 arXiv
[59]

Miller, High scale boundary conditions with an additional complex singlet, Phys

John McDowall, David J. Miller, High scale boundary conditions with an additional complex singlet, Phys. Rev. D 97 (11) (2018) 115042, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.115042, 1802.02391

2018 arXiv
[60]

Bohdan Grzadkowski, Da Huang, Spontaneous CP-Violating Electroweak Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from a Complex Singlet Scalar, JHEP 08 (2018) 135, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2018)135, 1807.06987

2018 arXiv
[61]

Ning Chen, Tong Li, Y ongcheng Wu, Ligong Bian, Complementarity of the future e+e− colliders and gravitational waves in the probe of complex singlet extension to the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 101 (7) (2020) 075047, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.075047, 1911.05579

2020 arXiv
[62]

Cheng-Wei Chiang, Bo-Qiang Lu, First-order electroweak phase transition in a complex singlet model with Z3 symmetry, JHEP 07 (2020) 082, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2020)082, 1912.12634

2020 arXiv
[63]

Avirup Ghosh, Deep Ghosh, Satyanarayan Mukhopadhyay, Cosmology of complex scalar dark matter: Interplay of self-scattering and annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 104 (12) (2021) 123543, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123543, 2103.14009

2021 arXiv
[64]

Gi-Chol Cho, Chikako Idegawa, Eibun Senaha, Electroweak phase transition in a complex singlet extension of the Standard Model with degenerate scalars, Phys. Lett. B 823 (2021) 136787, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136787, 2105.11830

2021
[65]

Gi-Chol Cho, Chikako Idegawa, Analyzing cancellation mechanism of the dark matter-quark scattering in a complex singlet extension of the Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B 994 (2023) 116320, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2023.116320, 2304.10096

2023
[66]

Ramsey-Musolf, Lei Zhang, Testing complex singlet scalar cosmology at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 01 (2024) 051, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)051, 2307.01615

Wenxing Zhang, Yizhou Cai, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf, Lei Zhang, Testing complex singlet scalar cosmology at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 01 (2024) 051, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)051, 2307.01615

2024 arXiv
[67]

Tania Robens, Two-Real-Singlet-Model Benchmark Planes, Symmetry 15 (2023) 27, doi: 10.3390/sym15010027, 2209.10996

2023 arXiv
[68]

Tania Robens, Extended scalar sectors from all angles (in 15 minutes), in: 59th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories 2025, 2504.13014

2025 arXiv
[69]

(CMS), Search for new particles in an extended Higgs sector with four b quarks in the final state at s=13TeV, Phys

Armen Tumasyan, et al. (CMS), Search for new particles in an extended Higgs sector with four b quarks in the final state at s=13TeV, Phys. Lett. B 835 (2022) 137566, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137566, 2203.00480

2022
[70]

(CMS), Search for a massive scalar resonance decaying to a light scalar and a Higgs boson in the four b quarks final state with boosted topology, Phys

Armen Tumasyan, et al. (CMS), Search for a massive scalar resonance decaying to a light scalar and a Higgs boson in the four b quarks final state with boosted topology, Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023) 137392, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137392, 2204.12413

2023
[71]

Georges Aad, et al. (ATLAS), Search for a new heavy scalar particle decaying into a Higgs boson and a new scalar singlet in final states with one or two light leptons and a pair of τ-leptons with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 10 (2023) 009, doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2023)009, 2307.11120

2023 arXiv
[72]

Armen Tumasyan, et al. (CMS), Search for a new resonance decaying into two spin-0 bosons in a final state with two photons and two bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 05 (2024) 316, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)316, 2310.01643

2024 arXiv
[73]

Search for a new heavy scalar boson decaying into a Higgs boson and a new scalar particle in the four b-quarks final state using proton- proton collisions at sqrts = 13 TeV (2024), ’CMS-PAS-HIG-20-012’

2024
[74]

(CMS), Searches for Higgs boson production through decays of heavy resonances, Phys

Aram Hayrapetyan, et al. (CMS), Searches for Higgs boson production through decays of heavy resonances, Phys. Rept. 1115 (2025) 368–447, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.004, 2403.16926

2025 arXiv
[75]

Georges Aad, et al. (ATLAS), Search for a resonance decaying into a scalar particle and a Higgs boson in the final state with two bottom quarks and two photons in proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2024) 047, doi: 10.1007/ JHEP11(2024)047...

2024 arXiv
[76]

(ATLAS), ATLAS searches for additional scalars and exotic Higgs boson decays with the LHC Run 2 dataset, Phys

Georges Aad, et al. (ATLAS), ATLAS searches for additional scalars and exotic Higgs boson decays with the LHC Run 2 dataset, Phys. Rept. 1116 (2025) 184–260, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.002, 2405.04914

2025 arXiv
[77]

Search for a new scalar resonance decaying to a Higgs boson and a new scalar with two bottom quarks and two photons in the final state in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV(2025), ’CMS-PAS-B2G-24-001’

2025
[78]

Search for resonances decaying to a Higgs boson in the bb final state and an anomalous jet (2025), ’CMS-PAS-B2G-24-015’

2025
[79]

(ATLAS), Search for decays of the Higgs boson into scalar particles decaying into four or six b-quarks using pp collisions at√s = 13 TeVwith the ATLAS detector (2025), 2507.01165

Georges Aad, et al. (ATLAS), Search for decays of the Higgs boson into scalar particles decaying into four or six b-quarks using pp collisions at√s = 13 TeVwith the ATLAS detector (2025), 2507.01165

2025 arXiv
[80]

G. C. Branco, P . M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, Marc Sher, Joao P . Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1–102, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002, 1106.0034

2012 arXiv
[81]

Haber, Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys

Sacha Davidson, Howard E. Haber, Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 035004, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.099902, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 72, 099902 (2005)], hep-ph/0504050. BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors 23

2005 arXiv
[82]

Georges Aad, et al. (ATLAS), Interpretations of the ATLAS measurements of Higgs boson production and decay rates and differential cross-sections in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2024) 097, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)097, 2402.05742

2024 arXiv
[83]

Tania Natalie Robens, BSM scenarios with missing energy at future lepton colliders, PoS ICHEP2022 (2022) 176, doi:10.22323/1.414.0176, 2211.09532

2022 arXiv
[84]

Tania Robens, The THDMa Revisited, Symmetry 13 (12) (2021) 2341, doi: 10.3390/sym13122341, 2106.02962

2021 arXiv
[85]

Porod, F

W. Porod, F . Staub, SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2458–2469, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.05.021, 1104.1573

2012 arXiv
[86]

Florian Staub, SARAH 4 : A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1773–1790, doi: 10.1016/j.cpc. 2014.02.018, 1309.7223

2014 arXiv
[87]

rep., CERN, Geneva 2020, URLhttps://cds.cern

Combination of the ATLAS, CMS and LHCb results on the B0 (s)→µ+µ− decays, tech. rep., CERN, Geneva 2020, URLhttps://cds.cern. ch/record/2727216

2020
[88]

(HFLAV), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2018, Eur

Y asmine Sara Amhis, et al. (HFLAV), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2018, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (3) (2021) 226, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8156-7 , 1909.12524

2021 arXiv
[89]

Misiak, Abdur Rehman, Matthias Steinhauser, Towards B→ Xsγ at the NNLO in QCD without interpolation in mc, JHEP 06 (2020) 175, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)175, 2002.01548

M. Misiak, Abdur Rehman, Matthias Steinhauser, Towards B→ Xsγ at the NNLO in QCD without interpolation in mc, JHEP 06 (2020) 175, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)175, 2002.01548

2020 arXiv
[90]

Misiak, private communication

M. Misiak, private communication
[91]

Ginzburg, Maria Krawczyk, Per Osland, Two Higgs doublet models with CP violation, in: International Workshop on Linear Colliders (LCWS 2002) 2002, pp

Ilya F . Ginzburg, Maria Krawczyk, Per Osland, Two Higgs doublet models with CP violation, in: International Workshop on Linear Colliders (LCWS 2002) 2002, pp. 703–706, hep-ph/0211371

2002 arXiv
[92]

Wafaa Khater, Per Osland, CP violation in top quark production at the LHC and two Higgs doublet models, Nucl. Phys. B 661 (2003) 209–234, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00300-6, hep-ph/0302004

2003 arXiv
[93]

Rom˜ao, Rui Santos, Jo˜ao P

Thomas Biek ¨otter, Duarte Fontes, Margarete M¨uhlleitner, Jorge C. Rom˜ao, Rui Santos, Jo˜ao P . Silva, Impact of new experimental data on the C2HDM: the strong interdependence between LHC Higgs data and the electron EDM, JHEP 05 (2024) 127, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024) 127, 2403.02425

2024 arXiv
[94]

Rom ˜ao, Rui Santos, Jo ˜ao P

Duarte Fontes, Jorge C. Rom ˜ao, Rui Santos, Jo ˜ao P . Silva, Undoubtable signs ofCP-violation in Higgs boson decays at the LHC run 2, Phys. Rev. D 92 (5) (2015) 055014, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.055014, 1506.06755

2015 arXiv
[95]

Mendez, A

A. Mendez, A. Pomarol, Signals of CP violation in the Higgs sector, Phys. Lett. B 272 (1991) 313–318, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91836-K

1991 doi
[96]

(ACME), Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron, Science 343 (2014) 269–272, doi:10.1126/science.1248213, 1310.7534

Jacob Baron, et al. (ACME), Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron, Science 343 (2014) 269–272, doi:10.1126/science.1248213, 1310.7534

2014 arXiv
[97]

Andreev, et al

V. Andreev, et al. (ACME), Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron, Nature 562 (7727) (2018) 355–360, doi: 10.1038/ s41586-018-0599-8

2018
[98]

Rom ˜ao, Rui Santos, Jo˜ao P

Duarte Fontes, Jorge C. Rom ˜ao, Rui Santos, Jo˜ao P . Silva, Large pseudoscalar Yukawa couplings in the complex 2HDM, JHEP 06 (2015) 060, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)060, 1502.01720

2015 arXiv
[99]

Martin, A Supersymmetry primer, Adv

Stephen P . Martin, A Supersymmetry primer, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 18 (1998) 1–98, doi: 10.1142/9789812839657 0001, hep-ph/9709356

1998 arXiv
[100]

Ivanov, Building and testing models with extended Higgs sectors, Prog

Igor P . Ivanov, Building and testing models with extended Higgs sectors, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 95 (2017) 160–208, doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp. 2017.03.001, 1702.03776

2017 arXiv
[101]

Brian Patt, Frank Wilczek, Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors, hep-ph/0605188

arXiv
[102]

Howard Georgi, Marie Machacek, DOUBL Y CHARGED HIGGS BOSONS, Nucl. Phys. B 262 (1985) 463–477, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85) 90325-6

1985 doi
[103]

Chanowitz, Mitchell Golden, Higgs Boson Triplets With M ( W) = M (Z) cosθω, Phys

Michael S. Chanowitz, Mitchell Golden, Higgs Boson Triplets With M ( W) = M (Z) cosθω, Phys. Lett. B 165 (1985) 105–108, doi: 10.1016/ 0370-2693(85)90700-2

1985
[104]

I. P . Ivanov, Joao P . Silva,CP-conserving multi-Higgs model with irremovable complex coefficients, Phys. Rev. D 93 (9) (2016) 095014, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.095014, 1512.09276

2016 arXiv
[105]

Fritz Zwicky, Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helvetica Physica Acta 6 (2) (1933) 110–127, doi:10.5169/seals-576517

1933 doi
[106]

Rubin, W

Vera C. Rubin, W. Kent Ford, Jr., Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions, Astrophys. J. 159 (1970) 379–403, doi:10.1086/150317

1970 doi
[107]

Rubin, W

Vera C. Rubin, W. Kent Jr. Ford, Rotation Curves of High-Luminosity Spiral Galaxies. I, Astrophysical Journal 225 (1978) 383–395, doi:10.1086/156472

1978 doi
[108]

D. J. Buettner, P . D. Morley, Neutrinos as the Cold Dark Matter: A critical review, KATRIN and new research directions, Phys. Dark Univ. 39 (2023) 101149, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.101149, 2208.06460

2023
[109]

Zee, SCALAR PHANTOMS, Phys

Vanda Silveira, A. Zee, SCALAR PHANTOMS, Phys. Lett. 161B (1985) 136–140, doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(85)90624-0

1985 doi
[110]

C. P . Burgess, Maxim Pospelov, Tonnis ter Veldhuis, The Minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: A Singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 709–728, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00513-2, hep-ph/0011335

2001 arXiv
[111]

Ramsey-Musolf, Gabe Shaughnessy, LHC Phenomenology of an Extended Standard Model with a Real Scalar Singlet, Phys

Vernon Barger, Paul Langacker, Mathew McCaskey, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf, Gabe Shaughnessy, LHC Phenomenology of an Extended Standard Model with a Real Scalar Singlet, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 035005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.035005, 0706.4311

2008 arXiv
[112]

Wan-Lei Guo, Yue-Liang Wu, The Real singlet scalar dark matter model, JHEP 10 (2010) 083, doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2010)083, 1006.2518

2010 arXiv
[113]

Y a. b. Zeldovich, Survey of Modern Cosmology, Adv. Astron. Astrophys. 3 (1965) 241–379, doi:10.1016/b978-1-4831-9921-4.50011-9

1965 doi
[114]

Gianfranco Bertone, Dan Hooper, Joseph Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279–390, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031, hep-ph/0404175

2005 arXiv
[115]

Hall, Karsten Jedamzik, John March-Russell, Stephen M

Lawrence J. Hall, Karsten Jedamzik, John March-Russell, Stephen M. West, Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter, JHEP 03 (2010) 080, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2010)080, 0911.1120

2010 arXiv
[116]

Francesco D’Eramo, Jesse Thaler, Semi-annihilation of Dark Matter, JHEP 06 (2010) 109, doi: 10.1007/JHEP06(2010)109, 1003.5912

2010 arXiv
[117]

Wacker, Mechanism for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles, Phys

Y onit Hochberg, Eric Kuflik, Tomer Volansky, Jay G. Wacker, Mechanism for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 171301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.171301, 1402.5143

2014 arXiv
[118]

Eric Kuflik, Maxim Perelstein, Nicolas Rey-Le Lorier, Yu-Dai Tsai, Elastically Decoupling Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (22) (2016) 221302, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.221302, 1512.04545

2016 arXiv
[119]

Ruderman, Light Dark Matter from Forbidden Channels, Phys

Raffaele Tito D’Agnolo, Joshua T. Ruderman, Light Dark Matter from Forbidden Channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (6) (2015) 061301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.061301, 1505.07107

2015 arXiv
[120]

Ruderman, Gabriele Trevisan, Dark matter freeze-out in a nonrelativistic sector, Phys

Duccio Pappadopulo, Joshua T. Ruderman, Gabriele Trevisan, Dark matter freeze-out in a nonrelativistic sector, Phys. Rev. D 94 (3) (2016) 035005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.035005, 1602.04219

2016 arXiv
[121]

Mathias Garny, Jan Heisig, Benedikt L ¨ulf, Stefan Vogl, Coannihilation without chemical equilibrium, Phys. Rev. D 96 (10) (2017) 103521, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.103521, 1705.09292. 24 BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors

2017 arXiv
[122]

Ruderman, Po-Jen Wang, Forbidden dark matter annihilations into Standard Model particles, JHEP 06 (2021) 103, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)103, 2012.11766

Raffaele Tito D’Agnolo, Di Liu, Joshua T. Ruderman, Po-Jen Wang, Forbidden dark matter annihilations into Standard Model particles, JHEP 06 (2021) 103, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)103, 2012.11766

2021 arXiv
[123]

Beacom, New Freezeout Mechanism for Strongly Interacting Dark Matter, Phys

Juri Smirnov, John F . Beacom, New Freezeout Mechanism for Strongly Interacting Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (13) (2020) 131301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.131301, 2002.04038

2020 arXiv
[124]

Fitzpatrick, Hongwan Liu, Tracy R

Patrick J. Fitzpatrick, Hongwan Liu, Tracy R. Slatyer, Yu-Dai Tsai, New pathways to the relic abundance of vector-portal dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 106 (8) (2022) 083517, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.083517, 2011.01240

2022 arXiv
[125]

Ruderman, Heavy Thermal Dark Matter from a New Collision Mechanism, Phys

Eric David Kramer, Eric Kuflik, Noam Levi, Nadav Joseph Outmezguine, Joshua T. Ruderman, Heavy Thermal Dark Matter from a New Collision Mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (8) (2021) 081802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.081802, 2003.04900

2021 arXiv
[126]

Andrzej Hryczuk, Maxim Laletin, Dark matter freeze-in from semi-production, JHEP 06 (2021) 026, doi: 10.1007/JHEP06(2021)026, 2104. 05684

2021 doi
[127]

Ruderman, Kai Schmidt-Hoberg, Dark Matter from Exponential Growth, Phys

Torsten Bringmann, Paul Frederik Depta, Marco Hufnagel, Joshua T. Ruderman, Kai Schmidt-Hoberg, Dark Matter from Exponential Growth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (19) (2021) 191802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.191802, 2103.16572

2021 arXiv
[128]

P . J. E. Peebles, Tests of Cosmological Models Constrained by Inflation, Astrophys. J. 284 (1984) 439–444, doi:10.1086/162425

1984 doi
[129]

Carroll, The Cosmological constant, Living Rev

Sean M. Carroll, The Cosmological constant, Living Rev. Rel. 4 (2001) 1, doi: 10.12942/lrr-2001-1, astro-ph/0004075

2001 arXiv
[130]

P . J. E. Peebles, Bharat Ratra, The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 559–606, doi: 10.1103/ RevModPhys.75.559, astro-ph/0207347

2003 arXiv
[131]

Aprile, et al

E. Aprile, et al. (XENON), Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Y ear Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (11) (2018) 111302, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.111302, 1805.12562

2018 arXiv
[132]

Agnes, et al

P . Agnes, et al. (DarkSide), Low-Mass Dark Matter Search with the DarkSide-50 Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (8) (2018) 081307, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.081307, 1802.06994

2018 arXiv
[133]

Amole, et al

C. Amole, et al. (PICO), Dark Matter Search Results from the Complete Exposure of the PICO-60 C 3F8 Bubble Chamber, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2) (2019) 022001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.022001, 1902.04031

2019 arXiv
[134]

A. H. Abdelhameed, et al. (CRESST), First results from the CRESST -III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D 100 (10) (2019) 102002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.102002, 1904.00498

2019 arXiv
[135]

(PandaX-4T), Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run, Phys

Yue Meng, et al. (PandaX-4T), Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (26) (2021) 261802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.261802, 2107.13438

2021 arXiv
[136]

Aalbers, et al

J. Aalbers, et al. (LZ), First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (4) (2023) 041002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.041002, 2207.03764

2023 arXiv
[137]

Alguero, G

G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F . Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml, A. Mjallal, A. Pukhov, micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter, Comput. Phys. Commun. 299 (2024) 109133, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109133, 2312.14894

2024
[138]

Kimberly Boddy, Jason Kumar, Danny Marfatia, Pearl Sandick, Model-independent constraints on dark matter annihilation in dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Phys. Rev. D 97 (9) (2018) 095031, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.095031, 1802.03826

2018 arXiv
[139]

Boddy, Stephen Hill, Jason Kumar, Pearl Sandick, Barmak Shams Es Haghi, MADHAT: Model-Agnostic Dark Halo Analysis Tool, Comput

Kimberly K. Boddy, Stephen Hill, Jason Kumar, Pearl Sandick, Barmak Shams Es Haghi, MADHAT: Model-Agnostic Dark Halo Analysis Tool, Comput. Phys. Commun. 261 (2021) 107815, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107815, 1910.02890

2021
[140]

Boddy, Jason Kumar, Andrew B

Kimberly K. Boddy, Jason Kumar, Andrew B. Pace, Jack Runburg, Louis E. Strigari, Effective J-factors for Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with velocity-dependent annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2) (2020) 023029, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023029, 1909.13197

2020 arXiv
[141]

(ATLAS), Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb −1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys

Georges Aad, et al. (ATLAS), Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb −1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023) 137963, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137963, 2301.10731

2023
[142]

Combined measurements and interpretations of Higgs boson production and decay at √s=13 TeV (2025), CMS-PAS-HIG-21-018

2025
[143]

Maria Gonc ¸alves, Margarete M ¨uhlleitner, Rui Santos, Tom ´as Trindade, Dark Matter in Multi-Singlet Extensions of the Standard Model (2025), 2505.07753

2025 arXiv
[144]

Rodrigo Capucha, Karim Elyaouti, Margarete M ¨uhlleitner, Johann Plotnikov, Rui Santos, Freeze-in as a complementary process to freeze- out, JHEP 09 (2024) 113, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)113, 2407.04809

2024 arXiv
[145]

Rodrigo Capucha, Karim Elyaouti, Milada Margarete M ¨uhlleitner, Johann Plotnikov, Rui Santos, RelExt: A New Dark Matter Tool for the Exploration of Dark Matter Models (2025), 2503.13087

2025
[146]

Christian Gross, Oleg Lebedev, Takashi Toma, Cancellation Mechanism for Dark-Matter–Nucleon Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (19) (2017) 191801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.191801, 1708.02253

2017 arXiv
[147]

Duarte Azevedo, Mateusz Duch, Bohdan Grzadkowski, Da Huang, Michal Iglicki, Rui Santos, One-loop contribution to dark-matter- nucleon scattering in the pseudo-scalar dark matter model, JHEP 01 (2019) 138, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)138, 1810.06105

2019 arXiv
[148]

Deshpande, Ernest Ma, Pattern of Symmetry Breaking with Two Higgs Doublets, Phys

Nilendra G. Deshpande, Ernest Ma, Pattern of Symmetry Breaking with Two Higgs Doublets, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 2574, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.18.2574

1978
[149]

Hall, Vyacheslav S

Riccardo Barbieri, Lawrence J. Hall, Vyacheslav S. Rychkov, Improved naturalness with a heavy Higgs: An Alternative road to LHC physics, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 015007, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.015007, hep-ph/0603188

2006 arXiv
[150]

Rajasekaran, Observing the Dark Scalar Doublet and its Impact on the Standard-Model Higgs Boson at Colliders, Phys

Qing-Hong Cao, Ernest Ma, G. Rajasekaran, Observing the Dark Scalar Doublet and its Impact on the Standard-Model Higgs Boson at Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 095011, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.095011, 0708.2939

2007 arXiv
[151]

Jan Kalinowski, Tania Robens, Dorota Sokolowska, Aleksander Filip Zarnecki, IDM Benchmarks for the LHC and Future Colliders, Sym- metry 13 (6) (2021) 991, doi:10.3390/sym13060991, 2012.14818

2021 arXiv
[152]

Anubha Bal, Edward Curtis, Anne-Marie Magnan, Benedikt Maier, Tania Robens, Nicholas Wardle, Search for additional scalar bosons within the Inert Doublet Model in a final state with two leptons at the FCC-ee (2025), 2504.12178

2025
[153]

(LHC Dark Matter Working Group), LHC Dark Matter Working Group: Next-generation spin-0 dark matter models, Phys

Tomohiro Abe, et al. (LHC Dark Matter Working Group), LHC Dark Matter Working Group: Next-generation spin-0 dark matter models, Phys. Dark Univ. 27 (2020) 100351, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100351, 1810.09420

2020
[154]

Dark matter summary plots for s-channel, 2HDM+a, Higgs portal and Dark Higgs models, tech. rep., CERN, Geneva 2024, all figures in- cluding auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PUBNOTES/ATL-PHYS-PUB-2024-010, URL https://cds.cern.ch...

2024
[155]

Marco Cirelli, Alessandro Strumia, Jure Zupan, Dark Matter (2024), 2406.01705

2024 arXiv
[156]

Cordero-Cid, J

A. Cordero-Cid, J. Hern ´andez-S´anchez, V. Keus, S. F . King, S. Moretti, D. Rojas, D. Sokołowska, CP violating scalar Dark Matter, JHEP 12 (2016) 014, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2016)014, 1608.01673

2016 arXiv
[157]

Ferreira, M

Duarte Azevedo, Pedro M. Ferreira, M. Margarete Muhlleitner, Shruti Patel, Rui Santos, Jonas Wittbrodt, CP in the dark, JHEP 11 (2018) 091, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)091, 1807.10322

2018 arXiv
[158]

Kaoru Hagiwara, R. D. Peccei, D. Zeppenfeld, K. Hikasa, Probing the Weak Boson Sector in e+ e- — > W+ W-, Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 253–307, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90685-7

1987 doi
[159]

G. J. Gounaris, J. Layssac, F . M. Renard, Signatures of the anomalous Zγ and ZZ production at the lepton and hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 073013, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.073013, hep-ph/9910395. BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors 25

2000 arXiv
[160]

Baur, David L

U. Baur, David L. Rainwater, Probing neutral gauge boson selfinteractions in ZZ production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 113011, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.113011, hep-ph/0008063

2000 arXiv
[161]

Grzadkowski, O

B. Grzadkowski, O. M. Ogreid, P . Osland, CP-Violation in theZZZ and ZWW vertices at e+e− colliders in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models, JHEP 05 (2016) 025, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2016)025, [Erratum: JHEP 11, 002 (2017)], 1603.01388

2016 arXiv
[162]

Herm `es B´elusca-Ma¨ıto, Adam Falkowski, Duarte Fontes, Jorge. C. Rom˜ao, Jo˜ao P . Silva, CP violation in 2HDM and EFT: theZZZ vertex, JHEP 04 (2018) 002, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2018)002, 1710.05563

2018 arXiv
[163]

Georges Aad, et al. (ATLAS), Evidence of pair production of longitudinally polarised vector bosons and study of CP properties in ZZ → 4ℓ events with the ATLAS detector at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 12 (2023) 107, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)107, 2310.04350

2023 arXiv
[164]

(CMS), Measurements of pp→ ZZ production cross sections and constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings at√s = 13 TeV, Eur

Albert M Sirunyan, et al. (CMS), Measurements of pp→ ZZ production cross sections and constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings at√s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (3) (2021) 200, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08817-8 , 2009.01186

2021 arXiv
[165]

ATLAS public results, https://https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/HiggsAndDiHiggsPublicResults
[166]

CMS public results, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsHIG
[167]

Summary plots for beyond Standard Model Higgs boson benchmarks for direct and indirect searches, tech. rep., CERN, Geneva 2024, all figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PUBNOTES/ATL-PHYS-PUB-2024- 008, URL https://...

2024
[168]

rep., CERN, Geneva 2015, URL https://cds.cern.ch/record/2039911

Emanuele Bagnaschi, Felix Frensch, Sven Heinemeyer, Gabriel Lee, Stefan Rainer Liebler, Milada Muhlleitner, Allison Renae Mc Carn, Jeremie Quevillon, Nikolaos Rompotis, Pietro Slavich, Michael Spira, Carlos Wagner, Roger Wolf, Benchmark scenarios for low tanβ in the MSSM, tech...

2015
[169]

Maiani, A

L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, V. Riquer, Probing Minimal Supersymmetry at the LHC with the Higgs Boson Masses, New J. Phys. 14 (2012) 073029, doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/7/073029, 1202.5998

2012 arXiv
[170]

Djouadi, L

A. Djouadi, L. Maiani, G. Moreau, A. Polosa, J. Quevillon, V. Riquer, The post-Higgs MSSM scenario: Habemus MSSM?, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2650, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2650-0 , 1307.5205

2013 arXiv
[171]

Djouadi, L

A. Djouadi, L. Maiani, A. Polosa, J. Quevillon, V. Riquer, Fully covering the MSSM Higgs sector at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2015) 168, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)168, 1502.05653

2015 arXiv
[172]

Thomas Biek ¨otter, Sven Heinemeyer, Jose Miguel No, Kateryna Radchenko, Mar´ıa Olalla Olea Romacho, Georg Weiglein, First shot of the smoking gun: probing the electroweak phase transition in the 2HDM with novel searches for A → ZH in ℓ+ℓ−tt and ννbb final states, JHEP 01 (202...

2024 arXiv
[173]

Nelson, A Renormalizable Model for the Galactic Center Gamma Ray Excess from Dark Matter Annihilation, Phys

Seyda Ipek, David McKeen, Ann E. Nelson, A Renormalizable Model for the Galactic Center Gamma Ray Excess from Dark Matter Annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 90 (5) (2014) 055021, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.055021, 1404.3716

2014 arXiv
[174]

Jose Miguel No, Looking through the pseudoscalar portal into dark matter: Novel mono-Higgs and mono-Z signatures at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 93 (3) (2016) 031701, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.031701, 1509.01110

2016 arXiv
[175]

Dorival Goncalves, Pedro A. N. Machado, Jose Miguel No, Simplified Models for Dark Matter Face their Consistent Completions, Phys. Rev. D 95 (5) (2017) 055027, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.055027, 1611.04593

2017 arXiv
[176]

Pseudoscalar mediators, JHEP 05 (2017) 138, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)138, 1701.07427

Martin Bauer, Ulrich Haisch, Felix Kahlhoefer, Simplified dark matter models with two Higgs doublets: I. Pseudoscalar mediators, JHEP 05 (2017) 138, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)138, 1701.07427

2017 arXiv
[177]

Patrick Tunney, Jose Miguel No, Malcolm Fairbairn, Probing the pseudoscalar portal to dark matter via ¯bbZ(→ℓℓ)+̸ ET : From the LHC to the Galactic Center excess, Phys. Rev. D 96 (9) (2017) 095020, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.095020, 1705.09670

2017 arXiv
[178]

13 (1) (2022) 007, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.1.007, 2202.12631

Spyros Argyropoulos, Ulrich Haisch, Benchmarking LHC searches for light 2HDM+a pseudoscalars, SciPost Phys. 13 (1) (2022) 007, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.1.007, 2202.12631

2022 arXiv
[179]

Giorgio Arcadi, Nico Benincasa, Abdelhak Djouadi, Kristjan Kannike, Two-Higgs-doublet-plus-pseudoscalar model: Collider, dark matter, and gravitational wave signals, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) (2023) 055010, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.055010, 2212.14788

2023 arXiv
[180]

Spyros Argyropoulos, Ulrich Haisch, Ilia Kalaitzidou, Novel collider signatures in the type-I 2HDM+a model, JHEP 07 (2024) 263, doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2024)263, 2404.05704

2024 arXiv
[181]

Abbiendi, et al

G. Abbiendi, et al. (OPAL), Decay mode independent searches for new scalar bosons with the OPAL detector at LEP, Eur. Phys. J. C 27 (2003) 311–329, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2002-01115-1, hep-ex/0206022

2003 arXiv
[182]

Schael, et al

S. Schael, et al. (ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Working Group for Higgs Boson Searches), Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons at LEP, Eur. Phys. J. C 47 (2006) 547–587, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2006-02569-7, hep-ex/0602042

2006 arXiv
[183]

Abbiendi, et al

G. Abbiendi, et al. (OPAL), Search for anomalous production of dilepton events with missing transverse momentum in e+ e- collisions at s**(1/2) = 183-Gev to 209-GeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 32 (2004) 453–473, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2003-01466-y, hep-ex/0309014

2004 arXiv
[184]

Abbiendi, et al

G. Abbiendi, et al. (OPAL), Search for chargino and neutralino production at s**(1/2) = 192-GeV to 209 GeV at LEP, Eur. Phys. J. C 35 (2004) 1–20, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2004-01758-8, hep-ex/0401026

2004 arXiv
[185]

Aaron Pierce, Jesse Thaler, Natural Dark Matter from an Unnatural Higgs Boson and New Colored Particles at the TeV Scale, JHEP 08 (2007) 026, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/08/026, hep-ph/0703056

2007 arXiv
[186]

Bandurin, et al., Review of Physics Results from the Tevatron, Int

D. Bandurin, et al., Review of Physics Results from the Tevatron, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (06) (2015) 1541001, doi: 10.1142/ S0217751X15410018, 1409.4861

2015 arXiv
[187]

Meenakshi Narain, et al., The Future of US Particle Physics - The Snowmass 2021 Energy Frontier Report (2022), 2211.11084

2022 arXiv
[188]

Https://www.usparticlephysics.org/2023-p5-report/

2023
[189]

Https://europeanstrategy.cern/
[190]

Https://hilumilhc.web.cern.ch/content/hl-lhc-project
[191]

Cepeda, et al., Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Y ellow Rep

M. Cepeda, et al., Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Y ellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 221–584, doi:10.23731/CYRM-2019-007.221, 1902.00134

2019 arXiv
[192]

Highlights of the HL-LHC physics projections by ATLAS and CMS (2025), 2504.00672

2025 arXiv
[193]

Jorge de Blas, et al., Focus topics for the ECFA study on Higgs / Top / EW factories (2024), 2401.07564

2024 arXiv
[194]

Https://indico.cern.ch/event/1399335/contributions/6392100/attachments/3069047/5429090/Elba cobal final.pdf
[195]

Benedikt, et al

M. Benedikt, et al. (FCC), Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors (2025), doi: 10.17181/CERN.9DKX.TDH9, 2505.00272

2025 arXiv
[196]

Benedikt, et al

M. Benedikt, et al. (FCC), Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 2, Accelerators, Technical Infrastructure and Safety (2025), doi:10.17181/CERN.EBAY .7W4X, 2505.00274

2025 arXiv
[197]

Benedikt, et al

M. Benedikt, et al. (FCC), Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 3, Civil Engineering, Implementation and Sustainability (2025), doi:10.17181/CERN.I26X.V4VF, 2505.00273

2025 arXiv
[198]

Subba, et al

A. Subba, et al. (Linear Collider), The Linear Collider Facility (LCF) at CERN (2025), 2503.24049

2025
[199]

Atti ´e, et al

D. Atti ´e, et al. (Linear Collider Vision), A Linear Collider Vision for the Future of Particle Physics (2025), 2503.19983

2025
[200]

26 BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors

Https://linearcollider.org/. 26 BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors
[201]

(CEPC Study Group), CEPC Technical Design Report: Accelerator, Radiat

Waleed Abdallah, et al. (CEPC Study Group), CEPC Technical Design Report: Accelerator, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods 8 (1) (2024) 1–1105, doi:10.1007/s41605-024-00463-y , [Erratum: Radiat.Detect.Technol.Methods 9, 184–192 (2025)], 2312.14363

2024
[202]

Erik Adli, et al., The Compact Linear e +e− Collider (CLIC) (2025), 2503.24168

2025 arXiv
[203]

K. M. Black, et al., Muon Collider Forum report, JINST 19 (02) (2024) T02015, doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/19/02/T02015, 2209.01318

2024 arXiv
[204]

Carlotta Accettura, et al., Towards a muon collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (9) (2023) 864, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11889-x , [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 36 (2024)], 2303.08533

2023 arXiv
[205]

(International Muon Collider), The Muon Collider (2025), 2504.21417

Carlotta Accettura, et al. (International Muon Collider), The Muon Collider (2025), 2504.21417

2025
[206]

Hamza Abouabid, et al., HHH whitepaper, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 1183, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13376-3 , 2407.03015

2024 arXiv
[207]

Shinya Kanemura, Shingo Kiyoura, Y asuhiro Okada, Eibun Senaha, C. P . Yuan, New physics effect on the Higgs selfcoupling, Phys. Lett. B 558 (2003) 157–164, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00268-5, hep-ph/0211308

2003 arXiv
[208]

Shinya Kanemura, Y asuhiro Okada, Eibun Senaha, C. P . Yuan, Higgs coupling constants as a probe of new physics, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 115002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.115002, hep-ph/0408364

2004 arXiv
[209]

Johannes Braathen, Shinya Kanemura, On two-loop corrections to the Higgs trilinear coupling in models with extended scalar sectors, Phys. Lett. B 796 (2019) 38–46, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07.021, 1903.05417

2019 arXiv
[210]

Johannes Braathen, Shinya Kanemura, Leading two-loop corrections to the Higgs boson self-couplings in models with extended scalar sectors, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (3) (2020) 227, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7723-2 , 1911.11507

2020 arXiv
[211]

Johannes Braathen, Shinya Kanemura, Makoto Shimoda, Two-loop analysis of classically scale-invariant models with extended Higgs sectors, JHEP 03 (2021) 297, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)297, 2011.07580

2021 arXiv
[212]

Henning Bahl, Johannes Braathen, Georg Weiglein, New Constraints on Extended Higgs Sectors from the Trilinear Higgs Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (23) (2022) 231802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.231802, 2202.03453

2022 arXiv
[213]

Henning Bahl, Johannes Braathen, Martin Gabelmann, Georg Weiglein, anyH3: precise predictions for the trilinear Higgs coupling in the Standard Model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (12) (2023) 1156, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12173-8 , [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 498 (2024)], ...

2023 arXiv
[214]

Jaouad El Falaki, Revisiting one-loop corrections to the trilinear Higgs boson self-coupling in the inert doublet model, Phys. Lett. B 840 (2023) 137879, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137879, 2301.13773

2023
[215]

Masashi Aiko, Shinya Kanemura, Mariko Kikuchi, Kodai Sakurai, Kei Y agyu, H-COUP Version 3: A program for one-loop corrected decays of any Higgs bosons in non-minimal Higgs models, Comput. Phys. Commun. 301 (2024) 109231, doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109231, 2311.15892

2024
[216]

Johannes Braathen, Sven Heinemeyer, Andrea Parra Arnay, Alain Verduras Schaeidt, Impact of one-loop corrections to trilinear scalar couplings on di-Higgs production in the RxSM (2025), 2507.02569

2025
[217]

Https://indico.ijclab.in2p3.fr/event/11484/contributions/36846/attachments/26024/38505/20250717AcceleratorOverview-AP2.pptx
[218]

Https://indico.ijclab.in2p3.fr/event/11484/contributions/36847/attachments/26052/38499/HH-2025-Higgs-EW-Strategy-Bernardi.pdf

2025
[219]

Https://ecfa.web.cern.ch/
[220]

Tania Robens, A Short Overview on Low Mass Scalars at Future Lepton Colliders, Universe 8 (2022) 286, doi: 10.3390/universe8050286, 2205.09687

2022 arXiv
[221]

Tania Robens, Extended scalar sectors from all angles – Mostly at lepton colliders, in: 24th Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity 2025, 2504.11969

2025 arXiv
[222]

Drechsel, G

P . Drechsel, G. Moortgat-Pick, G. Weiglein, Prospects for direct searches for light Higgs bosons at the ILC with 250 GeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (10) (2020) 922, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08438-1 , 1801.09662

2020 arXiv
[223]

Altmann, et al., ECFA Higgs, electroweak, and top Factory Study, CERN Y ellow Reports: Monographs, vol

J. Altmann, et al., ECFA Higgs, electroweak, and top Factory Study, CERN Y ellow Reports: Monographs, vol. 5/2025 2025, ISBN 978-92- 9083-700-8, 978-92-9083-701-5, doi:10.23731/CYRM-2025-005, 2506.15390

2025
[224]

315 (2024) 01026, doi:10.1051/epjconf/202431501026, 2409.19761

Bartłomiej Brudnowski, Kamil Zembaczy ´nski, Aleksander Filip ˙Zarnecki, Prospects for light exotic scalar measurements at the e+e− Higgs factory, EPJ Web Conf. 315 (2024) 01026, doi:10.1051/epjconf/202431501026, 2409.19761

2024
[225]

Mikael Berggren, Mar ´ıa Teresa N ´u˜nez Pardo de Vera, Bartłomiej Brudnowski, Kamil Zembaczy ´nski, Aleksander Filip ˙Zarnecki (ILD Concept Group), Search for Exotic Scalars at the International Linear Collider, PoS ICHEP2024 (2025) 080, doi:10.22323/1.476.0080

2025 doi
[226]

Dario Buttazzo, Diego Redigolo, Filippo Sala, Andrea Tesi, Fusing Vectors into Scalars at High Energy Lepton Colliders, JHEP 11 (2018) 144, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)144, 1807.04743

2018 arXiv
[227]

Richard Keith Ellis, et al., Physics Briefing Book: Input for the European Strategy for Particle Physics Update 2020 (2019), 1910.11775

2019 arXiv
[228]

Tao Han, Shuailong Li, Shufang Su, Wei Su, Y ongcheng Wu, Heavy Higgs bosons in 2HDM at a muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 104 (5) (2021) 055029, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.055029, 2102.08386

2021 arXiv
[229]

Johannes Braathen, Martin Gabelmann, Tania Robens, Panagiotis Stylianou, Probing the Inert Doublet Model via vector-boson fusion at a muon collider, JHEP 05 (2025) 055, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2025)055, 2411.13729

2025 arXiv
[230]

I. F . Ginzburg, I. P . Ivanov, K. A. Kanishev, The Evolution of vacuum states and phase transitions in 2HDM during cooling of Universe, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 085031, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.085031, 0911.2383

2010 arXiv
[231]

Barroso, P

A. Barroso, P . M. Ferreira, I. P . Ivanov, Rui Santos, Joao P . Silva, Evading death by vacuum, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2537, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2537-0 , 1211.6119

2013 arXiv
[232]

V. A. Kuzmin, V. A. Rubakov, M. E. Shaposhnikov, On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe, Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 36, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91028-7

1985 doi
[233]

Cohen, David B

Andrew G. Cohen, David B. Kaplan, Ann E. Nelson, Baryogenesis at the weak phase transition, Nucl. Phys. B 349 (1991) 727–742, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90395-E

1991 doi
[234]

Cohen, D

Andrew G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan, A. E. Nelson, Progress in electroweak baryogenesis, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43 (1993) 27–70, doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.43.120193.000331, hep-ph/9302210

1993
[235]

Quiros, Field theory at finite temperature and phase transitions, Helv

M. Quiros, Field theory at finite temperature and phase transitions, Helv. Phys. Acta 67 (1994) 451–583

1994
[236]

V. A. Rubakov, M. E. Shaposhnikov, Electroweak baryon number nonconservation in the early universe and in high-energy collisions, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 166 (1996) 493–537, doi:10.1070/PU1996v039n05ABEH000145, hep-ph/9603208

1996 arXiv
[237]

Koichi Funakubo, CP violation and baryogenesis at the electroweak phase transition, Prog. Theor. Phys. 96 (1996) 475–520, doi:10.1143/ PTP.96.475, hep-ph/9608358

1996 arXiv
[238]

Mark Trodden, Electroweak baryogenesis, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 (1999) 1463–1500, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.71.1463, hep-ph/9803479

1999 arXiv
[239]

Notes Phys

Werner Bernreuther, CP violation and baryogenesis, Lect. Notes Phys. 591 (2002) 237–293, hep-ph/0205279

2002 arXiv
[240]

Morrissey, Michael J

David E. Morrissey, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf, Electroweak baryogenesis, New J. Phys. 14 (2012) 125003, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/12/ 125003, 1206.2942

2012 arXiv
[241]

Kajantie, M

K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, Mikhail E. Shaposhnikov, Is there a hot electroweak phase transition at mH ≳ mW?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2887–2890, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2887, hep-ph/9605288. BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors 27

1996 arXiv
[242]

Csikor, Z

F . Csikor, Z. Fodor, J. Heitger, Endpoint of the hot electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 21–24, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 82.21, hep-ph/9809291

1999 arXiv
[243]

Edward Witten, Cosmic Separation of Phases, Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 272–285, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.30.272

1984 doi
[244]

Turner, Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions, Phys

Marc Kamionkowski, Arthur Kosowsky, Michael S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 2837–2851, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2837, astro-ph/9310044

1994 arXiv
[245]

B. P . Abbott, et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (6) (2016) 061102, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102, 1602.03837

2016 arXiv
[246]

Jose Ramon Espinosa, Mariano Quiros, Novel Effects in Electroweak Breaking from a Hidden Sector, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 076004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.076004, hep-ph/0701145

2007 arXiv
[247]

Ashoorioon, T

A. Ashoorioon, T. Konstandin, Strong electroweak phase transitions without collider traces, JHEP 07 (2009) 086, doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/ 2009/07/086, 0904.0353

2009 arXiv
[248]

Mitsuru Kakizaki, Shinya Kanemura, Toshinori Matsui, Gravitational waves as a probe of extended scalar sectors with the first order electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 92 (11) (2015) 115007, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.115007, 1509.08394

2015 arXiv
[249]

G. C. Dorsch, S. J. Huber, J. M. No, A strong electroweak phase transition in the 2HDM after LHC8, JHEP 10 (2013) 029, doi: 10.1007/ JHEP10(2013)029, 1305.6610

2013 arXiv
[250]

Basler, M

P . Basler, M. Krause, M. Muhlleitner, J. Wittbrodt, A. Wlotzka, Strong First Order Electroweak Phase Transition in the CP-Conserving 2HDM Revisited, JHEP 02 (2017) 121, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)121, 1612.04086

2017 arXiv
[251]

Freitas, Gabriel Lourenc ¸o, Ant´onio P

Felipe F . Freitas, Gabriel Lourenc ¸o, Ant´onio P . Morais, Andr´e Nunes, Jo ˜ao Ol´ıvia, Roman Pasechnik, Rui Santos, Jo ˜ao Viana, Impact of SM parameters and of the vacua of the Higgs potential in gravitational waves detection, JCAP 03 (03) (2022) 046, doi:10.1088/1475-751...

2022 arXiv
[252]

Chiara Caprini, et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/024, 1910.13125

2020 arXiv
[253]

Hindmarsh, Marvin L ¨uben, Johannes Lumma, Martin Pauly, Phase transitions in the early universe, SciPost Phys

Mark B. Hindmarsh, Marvin L ¨uben, Johannes Lumma, Martin Pauly, Phase transitions in the early universe, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 24 (2021) 1, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.24, 2008.09136

2021 arXiv
[254]

Peter Athron, Csaba Bal ´azs, Andrew Fowlie, Lachlan Morris, Lei Wu, Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 (2024) 104094, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104094, 2305.02357

2024
[255]

Christensen, C ´eline Degrande, Claude Duhr, Benjamin Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput

Adam Alloul, Neil D. Christensen, C ´eline Degrande, Claude Duhr, Benjamin Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250–2300, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.04.012, 1310.1921

2014 arXiv
[256]

Semenov, LanHEP — A package for automatic generation of Feynman rules from the Lagrangian

A. Semenov, LanHEP — A package for automatic generation of Feynman rules from the Lagrangian. Version 3.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 201 (2016) 167–170, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.01.003, 1412.5016

2016 arXiv
[257]

Florian Staub, From Superpotential to Model Files for FeynArts and CalcHep/CompHep, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 1077–1086, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.01.011, 0909.2863

2010 arXiv
[258]

Williams, HiggsBounds: Confronting Arbitrary Higgs Sectors with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput

Philip Bechtle, Oliver Brein, Sven Heinemeyer, Georg Weiglein, Karina E. Williams, HiggsBounds: Confronting Arbitrary Higgs Sectors with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 138–167, doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.003, 0811. 4169

2010 doi
[259]

Williams, HiggsBounds 2.0.0: Confronting Neutral and Charged Higgs Sector Predictions with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput

Philip Bechtle, Oliver Brein, Sven Heinemeyer, Georg Weiglein, Karina E. Williams, HiggsBounds 2.0.0: Confronting Neutral and Charged Higgs Sector Predictions with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 2605–2631, doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.0...

2011 arXiv
[260]

Williams, HiggsBounds− 4: Improved Tests of Extended Higgs Sectors against Exclusion Bounds from LEP , the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur

Philip Bechtle, Oliver Brein, Sven Heinemeyer, Oscar Stl, Tim Stefaniak, Georg Weiglein, Karina E. Williams, HiggsBounds− 4: Improved Tests of Extended Higgs Sectors against Exclusion Bounds from LEP , the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (3) (2014) 2693, doi:10.1140/e...

2014 arXiv
[261]

Philip Bechtle, Daniel Dercks, Sven Heinemeyer, Tobias Klingl, Tim Stefaniak, Georg Weiglein, Jonas Wittbrodt, HiggsBounds-5: Testing Higgs Sectors in the LHC 13 TeV Era, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (12) (2020) 1211, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08557-9 , 2006.06007

2020 arXiv
[262]

Philip Bechtle, Sven Heinemeyer, Oscar Stl, Tim Stefaniak, Georg Weiglein, HiggsS ignals: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2) (2014) 2711, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2711-4 , 1305.1933

2014 arXiv
[263]

Philip Bechtle, Sven Heinemeyer, Tobias Klingl, Tim Stefaniak, Georg Weiglein, Jonas Wittbrodt, HiggsSignals-2: Probing new physics with precision Higgs measurements in the LHC 13 TeV era, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2) (2021) 145, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08942-y , 2012.09197

2021 arXiv
[264]

Mahmoudi, SuperIso: A Program for calculating the isospin asymmetry of B — > K* gamma in the MSSM, Comput

F . Mahmoudi, SuperIso: A Program for calculating the isospin asymmetry of B — > K* gamma in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 745–754, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2007.12.006, 0710.2067

2008 arXiv
[265]

Arbey, F

A. Arbey, F . Mahmoudi, G. Robbins, SuperIso Relic v4: A program for calculating dark matter and flavour physics observables in Super- symmetry, Comput. Phys. Commun. 239 (2019) 238–264, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.01.014, 1806.11489

2019 arXiv
[266]

David Eriksson, Johan Rathsman, Oscar Stal, 2HDMC: Two-Higgs-Doublet Model Calculator Physics and Manual, Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 181 (2010) 189–205, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.011, 0902.0851

2010 arXiv
[267]

David Eriksson, Johan Rathsman, Oscar Stal, 2HDMC: Two-Higgs-doublet model calculator, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 833– 834, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.12.016

2010 doi
[268]

Rita Coimbra, Marco O. P . Sampaio, Rui Santos, ScannerS: Constraining the phase diagram of a complex scalar singlet at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2428, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2428-4 , 1301.2599

2013 arXiv
[269]

Margarete M ¨uhlleitner, Marco O. P . Sampaio, Rui Santos, Jonas Wittbrodt, ScannerS: parameter scans in extended scalar sectors, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (3) (2022) 198, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10139-w , 2007.02985

2022 arXiv
[270]

Logan, GMCALC: a calculator for the Georgi-Machacek model (2014), 1412.7387

Katy Hartling, Kunal Kumar, Heather E. Logan, GMCALC: a calculator for the Georgi-Machacek model (2014), 1412.7387

2014 arXiv
[271]

Raul Costa, Margarete M ¨uhlleitner, Marco O. P . Sampaio, Rui Santos, Singlet Extensions of the Standard Model at LHC Run 2: Bench- marks and Comparison with the NMSSM, JHEP 06 (2016) 034, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)034, 1512.05355

2016 arXiv
[272]

Isabell Engeln, Margarete M ¨uhlleitner, Jonas Wittbrodt, N2HDECAY: Higgs Boson Decays in the Different Phases of the N2HDM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 234 (2019) 256–262, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.07.020, 1805.00966

2019 arXiv
[273]

Rom ˜ao, Rui Santos, Jo ˜ao P

Duarte Fontes, Margarete M ¨uhlleitner, Jorge C. Rom ˜ao, Rui Santos, Jo ˜ao P . Silva, Jonas Wittbrodt, The C2HDM revisited, JHEP 02 (2018) 073, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2018)073, 1711.09419

2018 arXiv
[274]

Alwall, R

J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F . Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P . Torrielli, M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (...

2014 arXiv
[275]

Frederix, S

R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, D. Pagani, H. S. Shao, M. Zaro, The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations, JHEP 07 (2018) 185, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)085, [Erratum: JHEP 11, 085 (2021)], 1804.10017. 28 BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors

2018 arXiv
[276]

Christensen, Alexander Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model, Comput

Alexander Belyaev, Neil D. Christensen, Alexander Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1729–1769, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.01.014, 1207.6082

2013 arXiv
[277]

Christian Bierlich, et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codeb. 2022 (2022) 8, doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.8, 2203.11601

2022 arXiv
[278]

de Favereau, C

J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P . Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lema ˆıtre, A. Mertens, M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP 02 (2014) 057, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2014)057, 1307.6346

2014 arXiv
[279]

Michael Spira, HIGLU: A program for the calculation of the total Higgs production cross-section at hadron colliders via gluon fusion including QCD corrections (1995), hep-ph/9510347

1995 arXiv
[280]

Robert V. Harlander, Stefan Liebler, Hendrik Mantler, SusHi: A program for the calculation of Higgs production in gluon fusion and bottom- quark annihilation in the Standard Model and the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1605–1617, doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.02.006, 1212.3249

2013 arXiv
[281]

Plehn, M

T. Plehn, M. Spira, P . M. Zerwas, Pair production of neutral Higgs particles in gluon-gluon collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 479 (1996) 46–64, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00418-X, [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 531, 655–655 (1998)], hep-ph/9603205

1996 arXiv
[282]

Dawson, S

S. Dawson, S. Dittmaier, M. Spira, Neutral Higgs boson pair production at hadron colliders: QCD corrections, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 115012, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.115012, hep-ph/9805244

1998 arXiv
[283]

Thomas Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140 (2001) 418–431, doi: 10.1016/S0010-4655(01)00290-9, hep-ph/0012260

2001 arXiv
[284]

Mertig, M

R. Mertig, M. Bohm, Ansgar Denner, FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64 (1991) 345–359, doi:10.1016/0010-4655(91)90130-D

1991 doi
[285]

Vladyslav Shtabovenko, Rolf Mertig, Frederik Orellana, FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?, Comput. Phys. Commun. 306 (2025) 109357, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109357, 2312.14089

2025
[286]

G. J. van Oldenborgh, J. A. M. Vermaseren, New Algorithms for One Loop Integrals, Z. Phys. C 46 (1990) 425–438, doi: 10.1007/ BF01621031

1990
[287]

T. Hahn, M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118 (1999) 153–165, doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00173-8, hep-ph/9807565

1999 arXiv
[288]

Ansgar Denner, Stefan Dittmaier, Lars Hofer, Collier: a fortran-based Complex One-Loop LIbrary in Extended Regularizations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 212 (2017) 220–238, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.10.013, 1604.06792

2017 arXiv
[289]

Belanger, F

G. Belanger, F . Boudjema, A. Pukhov, A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs: A Program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 149 (2002) 103–120, doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00596-9, hep-ph/0112278

2002 arXiv
[290]

Belanger, F

G. Belanger, F . Boudjema, A. Pukhov, A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0: A Program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 367–382, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2006.11.008, hep-ph/0607059

2007 arXiv
[291]

Torsten Bringmann, Joakim Edsj ¨o, Paolo Gondolo, Piero Ullio, Lars Bergstr¨om, DarkSUSY 6 : An Advanced Tool to Compute Dark Matter Properties Numerically, JCAP 07 (2018) 033, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/033, 1802.03399

2018 arXiv
[292]

Mihailo Backovic, Kyoungchul Kong, Mathew McCaskey, MadDM v.1.0: Computation of Dark Matter Relic Abundance Using MadGraph5, Physics of the Dark Universe 5-6 (2014) 18–28, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2014.04.001, 1308.4955

2014 arXiv
[293]

Dark Univ

Federico Ambrogi, Chiara Arina, Mihailo Backovic, Jan Heisig, Fabio Maltoni, Luca Mantani, Olivier Mattelaer, Gopolang Mohlabeng, MadDM v.3.0: a Comprehensive Tool for Dark Matter Studies, Phys. Dark Univ. 24 (2019) 100249, doi: 10.1016/j.dark.2018.11.009, 1804. 00044

2019 doi
[294]

Wainwright, CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields, Comput

Carroll L. Wainwright, CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2006–2013, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.04.004, 1109.4189

2012 arXiv
[295]

Philipp Basler, Margarete M ¨uhlleitner, BSMPT (Beyond the Standard Model Phase Transitions): A tool for the electroweak phase transition in extended Higgs sectors, Comput. Phys. Commun. 237 (2019) 62–85, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.11.006, 1803.02846

2019 arXiv
[296]

Philipp Basler, Lisa Biermann, Margarete M ¨uhlleitner, Jonas M¨uller, Rui Santos, Jo ˜ao Viana, BSMPT v3 a tool for phase transitions and primordial gravitational waves in extended Higgs sectors, Comput. Phys. Commun. 316 (2025) 109766, doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2025.109766, 2404.19037

2025
[297]

J. E. Camargo-Molina, B. O’Leary, W. Porod, F . Staub,V evacious: A Tool For Finding The Global Minima Of One-Loop Effective Potentials With Many Scalars, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (10) (2013) 2588, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2588-2 , 1307.1477

2013 arXiv
[298]

J. E. Camargo-Molina, B. Garbrecht, B. O’Leary, W. Porod, F . Staub, Constraining the Natural MSSM through tunneling to color-breaking vacua at zero and non-zero temperature, Phys. Lett. B 737 (2014) 156–161, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.08.036, 1405.7376

2014 arXiv
[299]

Olum, Jeremy M

Ali Masoumi, Ken D. Olum, Jeremy M. Wachter, Approximating tunneling rates in multi-dimensional field spaces, JCAP 10 (2017) 022, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/10/022, [Erratum: JCAP 05, E01 (2023)], 1702.00356

2017 arXiv
[300]

Wolfgang G. Hollik, Georg Weiglein, Jonas Wittbrodt, Impact of Vacuum Stability Constraints on the Phenomenology of Supersymmetric Models, JHEP 03 (2019) 109, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)109, 1812.04644

2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Englert, R

F . Englert, R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 321–323, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.13.321

1964

[2] [2]

Higgs, Spontaneous Symmetry Breakdown without Massless Bosons, Phys

Peter W. Higgs, Spontaneous Symmetry Breakdown without Massless Bosons, Phys. Rev. 145 (1966) 1156–1163, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev. 145.1156

doi:10.1103/physrev 1966

[3] [3]

G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, T. W. B. Kibble, Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 585–587, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.585 1964

[4] [4]

(ATLAS), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys

Georges Aad, et al. (ATLAS), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1–29, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020, 1207.7214

arXiv 2012

[5] [5]

(CMS), Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys

Serguei Chatrchyan, et al. (CMS), Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30–61, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021, 1207.7235

arXiv 2012

[6] [6]

Cvetic, M

G. Cvetic, M. Nowakowski, A. Pilaftsis, CP violation with bosons, Phys. Lett. B 301 (1993) 77–82, doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(93)90724-V, hep-ph/9301272. BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors 21

arXiv 1993

[7] [7]

Haber, Venus Keus, Rui Santos, P-even, CP-violating signals in scalar-mediated processes, Phys

Howard E. Haber, Venus Keus, Rui Santos, P-even, CP-violating signals in scalar-mediated processes, Phys. Rev. D 106 (9) (2022) 095038, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.095038, 2206.09643

arXiv 2022

[8] [8]

T. D. Lee, A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation, Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 1226–1239, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1226

doi:10.1103/physrevd.8.1226 1973