Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 108 references

Exploring Many-Body Quantum Geometry Beyond the Quantum Metric with Correlation Functions: A Time-Dependent Perspective

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper develops a time-dependent Bures-geometry framework in which response spectra fix the quantum metric and three-operator correlation functions fix the quantum connection, recovering band-theoretic Christoffel symbols at zero…

desk verdict A careful formal framework for time-dependent many-body quantum geometry; the Bures connection via three-operator correlation functions is genuinely new and the reductions to known limits hold up. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23028 v2 pith:TYOBG4LW submitted 2025-07-30 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph

Yuntao Guan , Barry Bradlyn This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords quantumgeometryBuresdistanceFisherinformationnonlinearresponseChristoffelsymbolsspectraldensitythree-operatorcorrelationfunctiontime-dependentperturbationtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that the geometry of a quantum system under time-dependent driving can be organized order by order in perturbation theory using the Bures distance, the standard distinguishability metric on density matrices, between the initial thermal state and the time-evolved state. The paper treats every value of every external driving field as a coordinate, so the entire temporal profile of the perturbation becomes a point in an infinite-dimensional parameter space. Expanding the Bures distance in the perturbation strength yields a time-dependent Bures metric that is a weighted Fourier transform of the linear spectral density, and a Bures connection that is a weighted Fourier transform of a three-operator correlation function plus a second-order response term. If these results hold, higher-order correlation functions become direct probes of quantum geometry for interacting, finite-temperature systems, and known band-theoretic Christoffel symbols emerge as the zero-temperature noninteracting limit of the connection.

What carries the argument

The central object is the order-by-order expansion of the Bures distance, which converts geometric data on the density-matrix manifold into perturbative data about correlation functions. The machinery is a power-series matching: expanding the line-integral form of the Bures distance in the perturbation strength κ defines a metric and symmetrized Christoffel symbols at κ=0, while expanding the density-matrix trace in the same strength produces matrix elements of nested commutators. Equating the two orders gives the time-dependent Bures metric as a weighted Fourier transform of the linear spectral density and the Bures connection as a weighted Fourier transform of the three-operator correlation function $S_{μ1μ3μ2}(ω1,ω2)$ together with the second-order spectral density. The generalized fluctuation-dissipation relation for second-order response then shows that the correlation function S is the fundamental quantity, making the connection independent of the nonlinear response function alone.

What would settle it

In a noninteracting two-band model, evaluate the full time-dependent Bures connection and check that its quasistatic zero-temperature limit equals the total momentum derivative of the off-diagonal Berry connection product; any leftover energy-denominator term would disprove the reduction of the Bures connection to band-theoretic Christoffel symbols.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the lowest two nontrivial orders of the Bures distance between an equilibrium density matrix and its perturbed time evolution define a Riemannian geometry on the space of external driving fields. At quadratic order, the paper derives a time-dependent Bures metric expressed as the real part of a causal, tanh-weighted Fourier transform of the linear spectral density $χ''_{νμ}(ω)$, showing that linear response carries geometric data. At cubic order, it derives a Bures connection as the sum of an intrinsic term built from the three-operator correlation function $S_{μ1μ3μ2}(ω1,ω2)$ and a Fisher term built from the second-order spectral density $χ''_{μ1μ3μ2}(ω1,ω2)$; the generalized fluctuation-dissipation relation shows the full connection is determined by the correlation function once the second-order response is eliminated. In the quasistatic zero-temperature noninteracting limit the connection reduces to the symmetric part of the band-theoretic Christoffel symbols, expressible as the total momentum derivative of the off-diagonal Berry connection product, so it vanishes for insulators and becomes a Fermi-surface quantity for metals. The paper also shows that only the totally symmetric part of the connection is fixed by the Bures distance, and that the lab-frame parametrization of driving fields is the preferred coordinate choice.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction requires the Bures metric to be an analytic function of the perturbation strength at zero; near quantum phase transitions this analyticity can fail, and then the Taylor expansion that defines both the metric and the connection no longer exists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The instantaneous limit of the Bures metric relates the quantum Fisher information to the dynamic structure factor, so inelastic scattering can measure the metric directly.
  • The quasistatic current limit gives a finite-temperature generalization of the conductivity sum rule that ties the quantum metric to optical absorption, extending localization and entanglement probes to correlated materials.
  • The infinite-time metric counts frequency-resolved transitions weighted by tanh(βω/2), giving a geometric reading of the golden rule and of dissipated power at high temperature.
  • Because the Bures connection is determined by a three-operator correlation function valid at any temperature and interaction strength, higher-order correlations become experimental signatures of geometry beyond the metric.
  • In the zero-temperature noninteracting quasistatic limit the connection is a boundary term: it vanishes for insulators and reduces to a Fermi-surface quantity in metals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the framework is correct, the next-order object, the Riemann curvature, should be expressible in terms of four-operator correlation functions and third-order response, giving a concrete route to probe curvature experimentally.
  • The result that only the totally symmetric part of the connection is fixed suggests that antisymmetric geometric quantities, such as torsion or multi-state geometry, require a separate construction beyond the Bures distance expansion.
  • The same perturbative Bures-geometry logic should extend to open-system evolutions described by Lindbladians, where a time-dependent perturbation series for the density matrix exists; geometric response in dissipative systems would then be defined by the same dictionary.
  • Because the connection in insulators vanishes as a boundary term at zero temperature, a measurable nonzero symmetric Bures connection in an insulator would signal a breakdown of the quasistatic limit or the presence of interactions beyond the noninteracting band description.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript develops a time-dependent quantum geometric framework for many-body systems. Treating the spatiotemporal profiles of external perturbations as coordinates on the space of density matrices, the authors expand the Bures distance between the initial thermal state and the time-evolved state order by order in the perturbation strength. At lowest order they obtain a time-dependent Bures metric expressed as a weighted Fourier transform of the linear spectral density [Eq. (19)], unifying known results for instantaneous, quasistatic, and infinite-time limits and providing a geometric interpretation of Fermi's golden rule. At next order they define a symmetrized Bures connection comprising an intrinsic contribution, expressed through a three-operator correlation function [Eq. (74)], and a Fisher contribution expressed through the second-order response spectral density [Eq. (79)]. In the zero-temperature, noninteracting, quasistatic limit the connection reduces to the symmetric part of the band-theoretic Christoffel symbols [Eq. (108)]. The paper includes detailed appendices carrying out the Bures-distance expansion, evaluating the correlation functions, and performing the noninteracting reduction.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a systematic and unified framework for probing many-body quantum geometry beyond the quantum metric, applicable to finite-temperature and interacting systems. The recovery of the Souza-Wilkens-Martin sum rule, the quantum Fisher information relations, and the band-theoretic Christoffel symbols in the appropriate limits gives strong consistency checks. The explicit expressions for the metric and connection in terms of spectral densities and three-operator correlations suggest concrete experimental routes via inelastic scattering and nonlinear optical probes. A notable strength is the completeness of the appendices, which allow the reader to verify the noninteracting reduction step by step. The paper is also careful to state its limitations: the analyticity requirement at κ=0 and the fact that only the totally symmetric part of the connection is constrained by the Bures distance expansion.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II A, Eq. (7)] Equation (7) states an equality between the Bures distance and the integral of the line element along the specific curve in parameter space. Since the Bures distance is the infimum over all curves, this is exact only if the chosen curve is a geodesic; in general the curve length exceeds the distance. The difference is of order κ^4, so the third-order expansions used in Eqs. (10) and (12) remain valid, but please add a sentence clarifying this point so that the equality is not read as exact.
  2. [After Eq. (83), Eq. (85)] The statement 'we have added 0 = ∫ dω1 dω2 S_{μ1μ2μ3}(ω1, ω2)' is not correct if S is the un-symmetrized correlation function; the double frequency integral of S equals ⟨[Bμ3 Bμ1, Bμ2]⟩, which is generically nonzero. What integrates to zero is the totally symmetric combination S_{(μ1μ2μ3)}. Please correct the notation (or the claim) to refer to the symmetric part.
  3. [Sec. IV A, Eq. (87)] The vanishing of the zero-temperature instantaneous connection is stated to follow from Θ(E0−En)=1/2δ_{n0}, but after this substitution the remaining sum over m is not manifestly zero. Please add the explicit symmetrization step or a brief cancellation argument so that the reader can follow why the imaginary part vanishes.
  4. [Abstract and Sec. I] The paper uses the term 'Bures-Levi-Civita connection' for an object that is determined only through its totally symmetric part. Since the full Levi-Civita connection is not fixed by the Bures-distance expansion, consider qualifying the term (e.g., 'symmetrized Bures connection') in the abstract and introduction to avoid overclaiming.
  5. [Sec. I, first paragraph] Minor typo: 'play an major role' should be 'play a major role'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Bures metric and connection are independently derived from the Bures distance and the perturbation series, with known limits recovered rather than assumed.

full rationale

The paper's central results are not circular. The time-dependent Bures metric in Eq. (19) is obtained by expanding the independently defined Bures distance, Eq. (6), with the perturbative density matrix from Eq. (5), and the connection in Eqs. (74) and (79) is obtained from the variational definition in Eq. (12) after explicit evaluation in Appendices A and B. The linear spectral density in Eq. (18) and the three-operator correlation function in Eq. (72) are defined from unperturbed commutators, not from the geometric quantities, so the Fourier-transform expressions for the metric and connection are genuine outputs rather than re-labeled inputs. The reduction to the noninteracting band-theoretic Christoffel symbols in Eq. (108) is produced by explicit algebra in Appendix C, and the cited band-geometry result serves only as a comparison target. The self-citations to Refs. [80] and [81] supply standard spectral representations and Kramers-Kronig relations for second-order response; the paper re-derives the needed spectral identity in Eq. (80) and in Appendix B 2, so the central derivation does not rest on an unverified self-citation. The analyticity assumption and the restriction to the totally symmetric part of the connection are explicitly acknowledged limitations in Sec. II B, not hidden inputs that force the reported results. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no known result is imported by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the only tunable quantities are the physical external fields f^μ(t), β, and the regulator ϵ. The main assumptions are thermal initial conditions, analyticity of the Bures metric at κ=0, and a minimal-coupling expansion for current perturbations. The paper borrows the spectral representation of second-order response from prior work by the same group (Ref. [80]) but establishes the connection to the Bures distance by its own expansion.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Initial state is thermal, ρ(t→−∞) = e^{−βH0}/Z0 (Eq. 3).
    All response and correlation functions are equilibrium averages; the Bures distance measures departure from this state.
  • domain assumption Perturbation fields vanish at t→−∞ through convergence factor η(t) with η(t)=e^{ϵt} (ϵ→0) or Θ(t) (Eq. 2).
    This renders the time-ordered perturbation series Eq. (5) well-defined and is standard in linear response theory.
  • ad hoc to paper The Bures metric as a function of perturbation strength κ is analytic at κ=0 (Sec. II B).
    The order-by-order expansion Eq. (10) requires Taylor expandability; the authors note this fails near quantum phase transitions, so the framework excludes critical points.
  • domain assumption For current perturbations, H_A = H0 − Σ_n (1/n!) j_{μ1...μn} A_{μ1}...A_{μn} with well-defined diamagnetic vertices (Eq. (37)).
    The quasistatic current-response computation, including Γ_dia, requires this minimal-coupling expansion and the existence of the generalized diamagnetic currents.
  • domain assumption The spectral representation of second-order response functions and its generalized Kramers-Kronig relation from Ref. [80] is adopted (Eq. (77)).
    Used to derive the Fisher contribution Γ^f from the second-order spectral density; it is a published result by the same group, not re-derived here.
  • standard math Eigenstate expansion of the density matrix and the identity (p_n−p_m)/(p_n+p_m) = ∫dω tanh(βω/2) δ(ω+E_n−E_m) (Eq. (16)).
    Converts state sums to frequency integrals and underlies all spectral-density expressions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring Many-Body Quantum Geometry Beyond the Quantum Metric with Correlation Functions: A Time-Dependent Perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TYOBG4LW

@misc{pith2026250723028,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring Many-Body Quantum Geometry Beyond the Quantum Metric with Correlation Functions: A Time-Dependent Perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TYOBG4LW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23028}
}
read the original abstract

The quantum geometric tensor and quantum Fisher information have recently been shown to provide a unified geometric description of the linear response of many-body systems. However, a similar geometric description of higher-order perturbative phenomena including nonlinear response in generic quantum systems is lacking. In this work, we develop a general framework for the time-dependent quantum geometry of many-body systems by treating external perturbing fields as coordinates on the space of density matrices. We use the Bures distance between the initial and time-evolved density matrix to define geometric quantities through a perturbative expansion. To lowest order, we derive a time-dependent generalization of the Bures metric related to the spectral density of linear response functions, unifying previous results for the quantum metric in various limits and providing a geometric interpretation of Fermi's golden rule. At next order in the expansion, we define a time-dependent Bures-Levi-Civita connection for general many-body systems. We show that the connection is the sum of one contribution that is related to a second-order nonlinear response function, and a second contribution that captures the higher geometric structure of first-order perturbation theory. We show that in the quasistatic, zero-temperature limit for noninteracting fermions, this Bures connection reduces to the known expression for band-theoretic Christoffel symbols. Our work provides a systematic framework to explore many-body quantum geometry beyond the quantum metric and highlights how higher-order correlation functions can probe this geometry.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    By considering current perturbations in the qua- sistatic limit, we recover the finite-temperature generalization of the twist-angle quantum metric and the Souza-Wilkens-Martin sum rule

  2. [2]

    By considering density perturbations in the instan- taneous limit, we establishes a relationship between the metric/quantum Fisher information and the dynamic structure factor, connecting the geometric quantity to experimentally measurable observables

  3. [3]

    Fisher in- formation

    We identify the infinite-time metric as the transi- tion rate in Fermi’s Golden Rule. For clarity, the explicit expressions for the Bures dis- tance and the zero-temperature metrics under specific perturbations are listed in Table II. IV. BURES CONNECTION AND SECOND-ORDER RESPONSE We now turn back to Eqs. (10) and (12) to compute the time-dependent Bures ...

  4. [4]

    (89) for the high temperature asymp- totic behavior of the instantaneous Bures connection has important implications for density perturbations

    Density Perturbations in the Instantaneous Limit The sum rule Eq. (89) for the high temperature asymp- totic behavior of the instantaneous Bures connection has important implications for density perturbations. As in Sec. III A 1, we consider the instantaneous connection as- sociated to a perturbation of the form H=H 0 + 1 V X q ϕqδ(t)ρ−q.(90) The instanta...

  5. [5]

    X αβk ∆fβαksign(∆Eβαk)× 1 2 (∂µrν αβk)rλ βαk +r ν αβkrλ βαk ∂µ∆Eβαk ∆Eβαk −ir ν αβkrµ ααkrλ βαk +i X γ̸=α γ̸=β rµ αγkrν γβk rλ βαk ∆Eγβk ∆Eβαk # , (106) and Γin q.s. =A µAνAλRe

    Current Perturbations in the Quasistatic Limit Let us again consider the HamiltonianH 0 perturbed by a constant vector potential as defined in Eqs. (37) and (38). Note that unlike the general case we have consid- ered so far, the current perturbation in Eq. (37) includes diamagneticcontributions that are nonlinear in the ex- ternal vector potentialA µ. Wh...

  6. [6]

    (9) to third order inκ

    Expansion of the Arc Length Integral To begin, we expand the left-hand side of Eq. (9) to third order inκ. To simplify notation, let us define D(t) = sZ dt1dt2gµν(0, t, t1, t2)f µ(t1)f ν(t2) (A1) xµ(κ, t) =κfµ(t).(A2) Then we have Z κ 0 dκ′ sZ dt1dt2gµν(κ′ ⃗f , t, t1, t2)f µ(t1)f ν(t2) !2 ≈  κD(t) + κ2 2 R dt1dt2 ∂gµν (x,t,t1,t2) ∂κ κ=0 f µ(t1)f ν(t2) 2...

  7. [7]

    (9) to determine explicit expressions for the metric and the connection in terms of matrix elements of the perturbation

    Expansion of the T race We will now expand the trace on right hand side of Eq. (9) to determine explicit expressions for the metric and the connection in terms of matrix elements of the perturbation. To do so, we will follow the logic of Ref. [95] and introduce A(κ) = ρ 1 2 0 ρ(t)ρ 1 2 0 1 2 .(A8) We can make use of the identity A(κ)2 =ρ 1 2 0 ρ(t)ρ 1 2 0...

  8. [8]

    (5) into Eq

    Intrinsic Contribution To evaluate the intrinsic contribution Γ in(t) to the Bures connection, we can insert Eq. (5) into Eq. (70) to find Γin(t) =− 1 2 X nℓm ⟨n|ρ 1 |m⟩ ⟨m|ρ1 |ℓ⟩ ⟨ℓ|ρ1 |n⟩ (pℓ +p n)(pn +p m) =− (−i)3 2 Z Y i dtif µi (ti)Θ(t−t i)eϵti X nℓm ⟨n|[B µ1 (t1 −t), ρ0]|m⟩ ⟨m|[Bµ2 (t2 −t), ρ0]|ℓ⟩ ⟨ℓ|[Bµ3 (t3 −t), ρ0]|n⟩ (pℓ +p n)(pn +p m) = −i 2 Z...

Show all 108 references
  1. [9]

    Fisher Contribution We next turn to evaluate the Fisher contribution Γ f (t) in Eq. (71). Inserting Eq. (5), we find Γf (t) = X nℓ ⟨n|ρ 2 |ℓ⟩ ⟨ℓ|ρ1 |n⟩ pn +p ℓ = X nℓ (−i)3 Z t −∞ dt1 Z t1 −∞ dt2 Z t −∞ dt3f µ1 (t1)f µ2 (t2)f µ3 (t3)eϵ P i ti × ⟨n|[B µ1 (t1 −t),[B µ2 (t2 −t), ...

  2. [10]

    Derivation of the Diamagnetic Part of the Bures Connection In this section, we compute the diamagnetic contribution to the time-dependent Bures connection, Γ dia, as defined in Eq. (101). Using Eq. (100) forρ dia 2 (t) gives Γdia(t) = X nℓ ⟨n|ρ dia 2 |ℓ⟩ ⟨ℓ|ρ1 |n⟩ pn +p ℓ = (i...

  3. [11]

    Using Eqs

    Correlation F unction and Spectral Density for Noninteracting F ermions In this section we compute the correlation functionS µλν(ω1, ω2) and the second-order spectral density [χ′′]µλν(ω1, ω2) for a noninteracting crystalline systems of fermions with a constant vector potential...

  4. [12]

    For simplicity, we will take the zero-temperature limit which can exclude the thermal information and only capture the quantum part of the Bures connection

    Computing the Bures Connection for Noninteracting Systems at Zero T emperature In this section we will compute the Bures connection for systems of noninteracting fermions due to a quasistatic vector potential perturbation. For simplicity, we will take the zero-temperature limi...

  5. [13]

    ∆fβαksign(∆Eβαk) h 1 2 (∂µrν αβk)rλ βαk −ir ν αβkrµ ααkrλ βαk i# +A µAνAλRe X α̸=β α̸=γ,k

    Cancellation of T erms in the Bures Connection From Eqs. (105)–(107), we have Γpara q.s. + Γdia q.s. + Γin q.s. = +A µAνAλRe X αβk " ∆fβαksign(∆Eβαk) h 1 2 (∂µrν αβk)rλ βαk −ir ν αβkrµ ααkrλ βαk i# +A µAνAλRe X α̸=β α̸=γ,k " + 2i∆fβγk ∆Eβαk ∆Eγαk sign(∆Eγαk)rµ αβkrν βγk rλ γαk...

  6. [14]

    Provost and G

    JP. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Communications in Math- ematical Physics76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  7. [15]

    Y.-Q. Ma, S. Chen, H. Fan, and W.-M. Liu, Abelian and non-Abelian quantum geometric tensor, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics81, 245129 (2010). 29

    2010

  8. [16]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized Wannier functions for composite energy bands, Physical review B56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  9. [17]

    Ozawa and B

    T. Ozawa and B. Mera, Relations between topology and the quantum metric for Chern insulators, Physical Re- view B104, 045103 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Fundamental bound on topological gap, Physical Review X14, 011052 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Physical Review B90, 165139 (2014)

    R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Physical Review B90, 165139 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Neupert, C

    T. Neupert, C. Chamon, T. Iadecola, L. H. Santos, and C. Mudry, Fractional (Chern and topological) insulators, Physica Scripta2015, 014005 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact landau level description of geometry and interaction in a flatband, Physical review letters127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Vor- texability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional Chern insulators, Physical Review B108, 205144 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023), publisher: APS

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023), publisher: APS

    2023

  16. [24]

    T¨ orm¨ a, S

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, Superconduc- tivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems, Nature Reviews Physics4, 528 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materi- als, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00098 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, V

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, V. Peri, F. Schindler, S. D. Hu- ber, and B. A. Bernevig, Superfluid weight bounds from symmetry and quantum geometry in flat bands, Physical review letters128, 087002 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Huhtinen, J

    K.-E. Huhtinen, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, A. Chew, B. A. Bernevig, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Revisiting flat band supercon- ductivity: Dependence on minimal quantum metric and band touchings, Physical Review B106, 014518 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Liang, T

    L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Band geometry, Berry curvature, and super- fluid weight, Physical Review B95, 024515 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Jiang, T

    Y. Jiang, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Revealing quantum geometry in nonlinear quantum materials, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 076502 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Low-frequency di- vergence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals, Physical Review X10, 041041 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Rie- mannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nature Physics18, 290 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Mitscherling, A

    J. Mitscherling, A. Avdoshkin, and J. E. Moore, Gauge- invariant projector calculus for quantum state geome- try and applications to observables in crystals, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03637 (2024), arXiv:2412.03637

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Avdoshkin and F

    A. Avdoshkin and F. K. Popov, Extrinsic geometry of quantum states, Physical Review B107, 245136 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Verma, P

    N. Verma, P. J. Moll, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, Quan- tum geometry: Revisiting electronic scales in quantum matter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07173 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of nonlinear optical effects in solids, Science Advances2, e1501524 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Morimoto, S

    T. Morimoto, S. Kitamura, and N. Nagaosa, Geomet- ric aspects of nonlinear and nonequilibrium phenomena, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan92, 072001 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    W. J. Jankowski and R.-J. Slager, Quantized integrated shift effect in multigap topological phases, Physical Re- view Letters133, 186601 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced by Berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invari- ant materials, Physical review letters115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    Avdoshkin, J

    A. Avdoshkin, J. Mitscherling, and J. E. Moore, The multi-state geometry of shift current and po- larization, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16358 (2024), arXiv:2409.16358

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    W. J. Jankowski, A. S. Morris, A. Bouhon, F. N. ¨Unal, and R.-J. Slager, Optical manifestations and bounds of topological Euler class, Physical Review B111, L081103 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Shinada and N

    K. Shinada and N. Nagaosa, Quantum geometri- cal bound relations for observables, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12836 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    M. Kang, S. Kim, Y. Qian, P. M. Neves, L. Ye, J. Jung, D. Puntel, F. Mazzola, S. Fang, C. Jozwiak,et al., Mea- surements of the quantum geometric tensor in solids, Na- ture Physics21, 110 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    De Juan, A

    F. De Juan, A. G. Grushin, T. Morimoto, and J. E. Moore, Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in Weyl semimetals, Nature communications8, 15995 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Flicker, F

    F. Flicker, F. De Juan, B. Bradlyn, T. Morimoto, M. G. Vergniory, and A. G. Grushin, Chiral optical response of multifold fermions, Physical Review B98, 155145 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    D. Rees, K. Manna, B. Lu, T. Morimoto, H. Borrmann, C. Felser, JE. Moore, D. H. Torchinsky, and J. Oren- stein, Helicity-dependent photocurrents in the chiral Weyl semimetal RhSi, Science advances6, eaba0509 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Kaushik and J

    S. Kaushik and J. Cano, Magnetic photocurrents in mul- tifold Weyl fermions, Physical Review B104, 155149 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Alexandradinata, Quantization of intraband and in- terband Berry phases in the shift current, Physical Re- view B110, 075159 (2024)

    A. Alexandradinata, Quantization of intraband and in- terband Berry phases in the shift current, Physical Re- view B110, 075159 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Zhu and A

    P. Zhu and A. Alexandradinata, Anomalous shift and op- tical vorticity in the steady photovoltaic current, Physical Review B110, 115108 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Souza, T

    I. Souza, T. Wilkens, and R. M. Martin, Polarization and localization in insulators: Generating function approach, Physical Review B62, 1666 (2000)

    2000

  42. [50]

    Q. Niu, D. J. Thouless, and Y.-S. Wu, Quantized Hall conductance as a topological invariant, Physical Review B31, 3372 (1985)

    1985

  43. [51]

    Resta, Electron localization in the quantum hall regime, Physical review letters95, 196805 (2005)

    R. Resta, Electron localization in the quantum hall regime, Physical review letters95, 196805 (2005)

    2005

  44. [52]

    Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, The European Physical Journal B79, 121 (2011)

    R. Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, The European Physical Journal B79, 121 (2011)

    2011

  45. [53]

    Het´ enyi and P

    B. Het´ enyi and P. L´ evay, Fluctuations, uncertainty re- lations, and the geometry of quantum state manifolds, Physical Review A108, 032218 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski,Geometry of Quan- tum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)

    2006

  47. [55]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Physical Review Letters72, 3439 (1994)

    1994

  48. [56]

    Hauke, M

    P. Hauke, M. Heyl, L. Tagliacozzo, and P. Zoller, Mea- suring multipartite entanglement through dynamic sus- 30 ceptibilities, Nature Physics12, 778 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    Ba lut, B

    D. Ba lut, B. Bradlyn, and P. Abbamonte, Quantum en- tanglement and quantum geometry measured with inelas- tic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B111, 125161 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Ba lut, X

    D. Ba lut, X. Guo, N. de Vries, D. Chaudhuri, B. Brad- lyn, P. Abbamonte, and P. W. Phillips, Quantum fisher information reveals UV-IR mixing in the strange metal, Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications635, 1354750 (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    Kruchkov, Topological control of quantum speed lim- its (2025), arXiv:2507.15950 [quant-ph]

    A. Kruchkov, Topological control of quantum speed lim- its (2025), arXiv:2507.15950 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Quantum weight: A fundamental property of quantum many-body systems, Physical Re- view Research7, 023158 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    Mendez-Valderrama, D

    JF. Mendez-Valderrama, D. Mao, and D. Chowdhury, Low-energy optical sum rule in moir´ e graphene, Physical Review Letters133, 196501 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    D. Mao, J. F. Mendez-Valderrama, and D. Chowdhury, Low-energy optical absorption in correlated insulators: Projected sum rules and the role of quantum geometry, Physical Review B112, 075116 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Mazza, S

    F. Mazza, S. Biswas, X. Yan, A. Prokofiev, P. Stef- fens, Q. Si, F. F. Assaad, and S. Paschen, Quantum fisher information in a strange metal, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12779 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Y. Fang, M. Mahankali, Y. Wang, L. Chen, H. Hu, S. Paschen, and Q. Si, Amplified multipartite entangle- ment witnessed in a quantum critical metal, Nature Com- munications16, 2498 (2025)

    2025

  57. [65]

    Y. Wang, Y. Fang, F. Xie, and Q. Si, Local and non-local entanglement witnesses of fermi liquid, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13958 (2025), arXiv:2502.13958

    2025 arXiv

  58. [66]

    G. Ji, D. E. Palomino, N. Goldman, T. Ozawa, P. Rise- borough, J. Wang, and B. Mera, Density matrix ge- ometry and sum rules, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14028 (2025), arXiv:2507.14028

    2025 arXiv

  59. [67]

    D. Bures, An extension of Kakutani’s theorem on infi- nite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite w*-algebras, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society135, 199 (1969)

    1969

  60. [68]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information(Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  61. [69]

    Verma and R

    N. Verma and R. Queiroz, Instantaneous response and quantum geometry of insulators, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07052 (2024), arxiv:2403.07052

    2024

  62. [70]

    Resta, Nonadiabatic quantum geometry and optical conductivity, Physical Review B111, 205107 (2025)

    R. Resta, Nonadiabatic quantum geometry and optical conductivity, Physical Review B111, 205107 (2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    Carollo, D

    A. Carollo, D. Valenti, and B. Spagnolo, Geometry of quantum phase transitions, Physics Reports838, 1 (2020)

    2020

  64. [72]

    Lambert and E

    J. Lambert and E. Sørensen, From classical to quantum information geometry: a guide for physicists, New Jour- nal of Physics25, 081201 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    Uhlmann, The metric of Bures and the geometric phase, Quantum groups and related topics , 267 (1992)

    A. Uhlmann, The metric of Bures and the geometric phase, Quantum groups and related topics , 267 (1992)

    1992

  66. [74]

    Uhlmann, Geometric phases and related structures, Reports on Mathematical Physics36, 461 (1995)

    A. Uhlmann, Geometric phases and related structures, Reports on Mathematical Physics36, 461 (1995)

    1995

  67. [75]

    Q. Wang, B. Wang, J. Wang, and L. Zhang, Quantum geometric tensor for mixed states based on the covari- ant derivative, Chinese Physics Letters 10.1088/0256- 307x/42/7/070603 (2025)

    2025 doi

  68. [76]

    Kleinert,Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter: Vol

    H. Kleinert,Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter: Vol. 1: Superflow and Vortex Lines (Disorder Fields, Phase Transitions) Vol. 2: Stresses and Defects (Differential Geometry, Crystal Melting)(World Scientific, 1989)

    1989

  69. [77]

    Zaanen, Z

    J. Zaanen, Z. Nussinov, and SI. Mukhin, Duality in 2+ 1D quantum elasticity: Superconductivity and quantum nematic order, Annals of Physics310, 181 (2004)

    2004

  70. [78]

    Katanaev and IV

    MO. Katanaev and IV. Volovich, Theory of defects in solids and three-dimensional gravity, Annals of Physics 216, 1 (1992)

    1992

  71. [79]

    Bradlyn and N

    B. Bradlyn and N. Read, Low-energy effective theory in the bulk for transport in a topological phase, Physical Review B91, 125303 (2015)

    2015

  72. [80]

    H. Quan, Z. Song, X. F. Liu, P. Zanardi, and C.-P. Sun, Decay of loschmidt echo enhanced by quantum criticality, Physical review letters96, 140604 (2006)

    2006

  73. [81]

    Zanardi, M

    P. Zanardi, M. Cozzini, and P. Giorda, Ground state fi- delity and quantum phase transitions in free fermi sys- tems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment2007, L02002 (2007)

    2007

  74. [82]

    Campos Venuti and P

    L. Campos Venuti and P. Zanardi, Quantum critical scal- ing of the geometric tensors, Physical review letters99, 095701 (2007)

    2007

  75. [83]

    Forster, Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symme- try, and correlation functions, inReading, Mass., WA Benjamin, Inc.(Frontiers in Physics

    D. Forster, Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symme- try, and correlation functions, inReading, Mass., WA Benjamin, Inc.(Frontiers in Physics. Volume 47), 1975. 343 p., Vol. 47 (1975)

    1975

  76. [84]

    Scandi, P

    M. Scandi, P. Abiuso, J. Surace, and D. De Santis, Quan- tum Fisher Information and its dynamical nature, Re- ports on Progress in Physics88, 076001 (2023)

    2023

  77. [85]

    P. M. Tam and C. L. Kane, Topological density corre- lations in a Fermi gas, Physical Review B109, 035413 (2024)

    2024

  78. [86]

    Resta, Drude weight and superconducting weight, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter30, 414001 (2018)

    R. Resta, Drude weight and superconducting weight, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter30, 414001 (2018)

    2018

  79. [87]

    Note that the integral weighted by sign(t) in Eq. (44) is the time-domain representation of the Hilbert transform, such that this contribution of the Drude weight comes from evaluating [χ ′]µν (0), where [χ ′]µν is the Kramers- Kronig partner of [χ ′′]µν

  80. [88]

    Souza, R

    I. Souza, R. Martin, and M. Stengel, Optical bounds on many-electron localization, SciPost Physics18, 127 (2025)

    2025

  81. [89]

    Verma and R

    N. Verma and R. Queiroz, Framework to measure quan- tum metric from step response, Physical Review Letters 134, 106403 (2025)

    2025

  82. [90]

    Resta, Polarization fluctuations in insulators and met- als: New and old theories merge, Physical review letters 96, 137601 (2006)

    R. Resta, Polarization fluctuations in insulators and met- als: New and old theories merge, Physical review letters 96, 137601 (2006)

    2006

  83. [91]

    Ba lut, B

    D. Ba lut, B. Bradlyn, M. D. Collins, and P. Abba- monte, Fundamental tests of quantum geometric bounds in ionic and covalent insulators using inelastic x-ray scattering, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.19054 (2026), arXiv:2601.19054

    2026

  84. [92]

    Chowdhury, Information, dissipation, and planck- ian optimality, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.04953 (2026), arXiv:2602.04953

    D. Chowdhury, Information, dissipation, and planck- ian optimality, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.04953 (2026), arXiv:2602.04953

    2026

  85. [93]

    Bradlyn and P

    B. Bradlyn and P. Abbamonte, Spectral density and sum rules for second-order response functions, Physical Re- view B110, 245132 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    Sinha and B

    S. Sinha and B. Bradlyn, Imaginary time formalism for causal nonlinear response functions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21428 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  87. [95]

    F. B. Kugler, S.-S. B. Lee, and J. von Delft, Multipoint correlation functions: Spectral representation and nu- merical evaluation, Physical Review X11, 041006 (2021). 31

    2021

  88. [96]

    A. M. Cook, B. M. Fregoso, F. De Juan, S. Coh, and J. E. Moore, Design principles for shift current photovoltaics, Nature communications8, 14176 (2017)

    2017

  89. [97]

    Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics(CRC press, 2018)

    M. Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics(CRC press, 2018)

    2018

  90. [98]

    R. C. McKay, F. Mahmood, and B. Bradlyn, Charge con- servation beyond uniformity: Spatially inhomogeneous electromagnetic response in periodic solids, Physical Re- view X14, 011058 (2024)

    2024

  91. [99]

    Watanabe and M

    H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Generalized$f$-sum rules and Kohn formulas on nonlinear conductivities, Physical Review B102, 165137 (2020)

    2020

  92. [100]

    D. E. Parker, T. Morimoto, J. Orenstein, and J. E. Moore, Diagrammatic approach to nonlinear optical re- sponse with application to weyl semimetals, Physical Re- view B99, 045121 (2019)

    2019

  93. [101]

    Komissarov, T

    I. Komissarov, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, The quan- tum geometric origin of capacitance in insulators, Nature Communications15, 4621 (2024)

    2024

  94. [102]

    Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, Quantum geom- etry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets, Physi- cal Review Letters133, 106701 (2024), publisher: APS

    2024

  95. [103]

    Leonforte, D

    L. Leonforte, D. Valenti, B. Spagnolo, A. A. Dubkov, and A. Carollo, Haldane model at finite temperature, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2019, 094001 (2019)

    2019

  96. [104]

    Leonforte, D

    L. Leonforte, D. Valenti, B. Spagnolo, and A. Carollo, Uhlmann number in translational invariant systems, Sci- entific reports9, 9106 (2019)

    2019

  97. [105]

    V. V. Albert, B. Bradlyn, M. Fraas, and L. Jiang, Ge- ometry and response of lindbladians, Physical Review X 6, 041031 (2016)

    2016

  98. [106]

    L. Pan, X. Chen, Y. Chen, and H. Zhai, Non-hermitian linear response theory, Nature Physics16, 767 (2020)

    2020

  99. [107]

    K. T. Geier and P. Hauke, From non-hermitian lin- ear response to dynamical correlations and fluctuation- dissipation relations in quantum many-body systems, PRX Quantum3, 030308 (2022)

    2022

  100. [108]

    H¨ ubner, Explicit computation of the bures distance for density matrices, Physics Letters A163, 239 (1992)

    M. H¨ ubner, Explicit computation of the bures distance for density matrices, Physics Letters A163, 239 (1992)

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.