REVIEW 4 cited by
Reinitializing weights vs units for maintaining plasticity in neural networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Reinitializing weights vs units for maintaining plasticity in neural networks
read the original abstract
Loss of plasticity is a phenomenon in which a neural network loses its ability to learn when trained for an extended time on non-stationary data. It is a crucial problem to overcome when designing systems that learn continually. An effective technique for preventing loss of plasticity is reinitializing parts of the network. In this paper, we compare two different reinitialization schemes: reinitializing units vs reinitializing weights. We propose a new algorithm, which we name \textit{selective weight reinitialization}, for reinitializing the least useful weights in a network. We compare our algorithm to continual backpropagation and ReDo, two previously proposed algorithms that reinitialize units in the network. Through our experiments in continual supervised learning problems, we identify two settings when reinitializing weights is more effective at maintaining plasticity than reinitializing units: (1) when the network has a small number of units and (2) when the network includes layer normalization. Conversely, reinitializing weights and units are equally effective at maintaining plasticity when the network is of sufficient size and does not include layer normalization. We found that reinitializing weights maintains plasticity in a wider variety of settings than reinitializing units.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Learning to Forget: Continual Learning with Adaptive Weight Decay
FADE adapts per-parameter weight decay rates online via approximate meta-gradient descent to improve controlled forgetting over fixed decay in online tracking and streaming classification.
-
Calibrated Partial Resets: Preventing Policy Collapse in Continual Reinforcement Learning
Utility-scaled partial neuron resets prevent policy collapse in long-horizon continual RL while matching or beating binary-reset and uniform-decay baselines on several benchmarks.
-
Attribution-Based Neuron Utility for Plasticity Restoration in Deep Networks
GXD estimates the first-order functional cost of replacing a neuron via gradient attribution to make adaptive resets more reliable for preserving plasticity in continual learning.
-
Agentic Safety is an Epistemic Property, Not a Behavioral One
The paper reframes agentic safety as an epistemic property defined by teachability—the capacity to preserve future corrective leverage—rather than a behavioral property of the current policy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.