pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.02788 · v3 · submitted 2025-08-04 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el· hep-th

Measurement-Induced Entanglement in Conformal Field Theory

Kabir Khanna , Romain Vasseur This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 00:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-th
keywords measurement-induced entanglementconformal field theoryTomonaga-Luttinger liquidsreplica trickBorn rule averagingboundary conditionsquantum critical statescharge measurements
0
0 comments X

The pith

In Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids, local charge measurements produce measurement-induced entanglement that is universal, conformally invariant, and fixed by the CFT operator content.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that performing a local measurement of the charge operator on a one-dimensional quantum critical state creates entanglement between distant parts of the system. This entanglement is the same for any system whose low-energy physics is described by the same compact free boson conformal field theory, and it respects the full conformal symmetry of that theory. The calculation uses a replica trick to average properly over all possible random measurement outcomes weighted by their Born-rule probabilities, rather than assuming one fixed outcome. The resulting entanglement admits a direct interpretation as an average over a family of conformally invariant boundary conditions in the CFT. If this holds, then the effect of measurements on entanglement in entire families of critical states becomes analytically predictable from symmetry alone.

Core claim

Measuring the local charge operator in a compact free boson CFT produces measurement-induced entanglement that is entirely universal and conformally invariant. The entanglement depends only on the operator content of the CFT and differs from the entanglement obtained by forcing a particular measurement outcome. It has a natural interpretation in terms of Born-rule averaging over conformally invariant boundary conditions, and the replica trick yields an exact analytic expression that agrees well with matrix-product-state numerics.

What carries the argument

The replica trick that converts the average over random Born-rule measurement outcomes into an average over conformally invariant boundary conditions in the CFT.

If this is right

  • The measurement-induced entanglement is identical for all microscopic realizations of the same CFT, independent of lattice details.
  • Physical measurements with random outcomes induce strictly less entanglement than post-selection on a fixed outcome.
  • The exact value of the entanglement can be read off from the scaling dimensions and operator product expansion data of the CFT.
  • The result supplies an analytic benchmark for any numerical or experimental study of measurements in one-dimensional critical systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same boundary-condition averaging approach could be applied to other one-dimensional CFTs, such as those describing Ising or Potts criticality, to obtain universal predictions for measurement effects.
  • In cold-atom or superconducting-circuit experiments that realize Luttinger liquids, one could test the predicted entanglement by performing local charge measurements and extracting the resulting mutual information between distant segments.
  • The framework suggests a route to designing measurement protocols that generate controllable, symmetry-protected entanglement in quantum simulators without fine-tuning microscopic parameters.
  • The distinction between Born averaging and forced outcomes may help classify different universality classes of measurement-induced dynamics in monitored quantum circuits.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy physics of Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids is accurately captured by compact free boson conformal field theories, and the replica trick correctly implements the average over random measurement outcomes according to the Born rule.

What would settle it

Numerical matrix-product-state computations for a concrete Luttinger parameter that yield a measurement-induced entanglement value differing from the analytic CFT prediction by more than numerical error would falsify the universality claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.02788 by Kabir Khanna, Romain Vasseur.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Local measurements can radically reshape patterns of many-body entanglement, especially in long-range entangled quantum-critical states. Yet, analytical results addressing the effects of measurements on many-body states remain scarce, and measurements are often approximated as forcing specific measurement outcomes. We study measurement-induced entanglement (MIE) in Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids, a broad family of 1+1d quantum critical states described at low energies by compact free boson conformal field theories (CFT). Measuring the local charge operator, we show that the MIE is entirely universal, conformally invariant, and depends on the operator content of the CFT. Using a replica-trick to address the randomness of the measurement outcomes, we compute the MIE exactly for Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids, in very good agreement with matrix-product state calculations. We show that the MIE for physical quantum measurements is fundamentally different from the entanglement induced by forcing measurement outcomes, and has a natural interpretation in terms of Born averaging over conformally-invariant boundary conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies measurement-induced entanglement (MIE) in Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids described by compact free boson CFTs. Measuring the local charge operator, the authors employ a replica trick to average over random outcomes according to the Born rule and derive that the resulting MIE is universal, conformally invariant, and determined by the CFT operator content. Exact CFT results are obtained and reported to agree well with matrix-product state numerics; the MIE is shown to differ from the entanglement produced by forcing specific measurement outcomes and is interpreted as Born averaging over conformally invariant boundary conditions.

Significance. If the central results hold, this supplies one of the few exact analytical expressions for how local measurements reshape entanglement in 1+1d critical states. The combination of an exact CFT derivation, the numerical validation against matrix-product states, and the boundary-condition interpretation constitutes a clear strength. The framework may generalize to other CFTs and inform studies of measurement-induced entanglement transitions.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (replica-trick construction): The central claim that the MIE is exactly universal and conformally invariant rests on the assertion that inserting the local charge (vertex) operators into the replicated theory and taking the replica limit correctly reproduces the Born-rule weighted average over post-measurement states. For the compact boson, this requires that the measurement operators commute with the replica symmetry without generating additional weighting factors from the compactification radius or winding sectors. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit step-by-step demonstration of this equivalence (e.g., showing how the probabilistic sum over eigenvalues is replaced by the boundary-condition average) rather than leaving the mapping implicit.
  2. [§5] §5 (numerical comparison): The reported agreement with matrix-product state calculations is cited as supporting evidence for universality, yet the quantitative error measures, the precise range of Luttinger parameters K examined, and any finite-size scaling analysis are not detailed. This information is needed to assess whether the numerical data truly corroborate the CFT prediction across the claimed universality class.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'very good agreement' with MPS calculations; adding a quantitative figure of merit (e.g., relative deviation or R²) would improve precision.
  2. [Sec. 2] Notation for the replica limit that defines the MIE should be introduced explicitly in the main text (rather than only in an appendix) to aid readers who are not already familiar with replica techniques applied to measurements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the replica-trick construction and the numerical evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (replica-trick construction): The central claim that the MIE is exactly universal and conformally invariant rests on the assertion that inserting the local charge (vertex) operators into the replicated theory and taking the replica limit correctly reproduces the Born-rule weighted average over post-measurement states. For the compact boson, this requires that the measurement operators commute with the replica symmetry without generating additional weighting factors from the compactification radius or winding sectors. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit step-by-step demonstration of this equivalence (e.g., showing how the probabilistic sum over eigenvalues is replaced by the boundary-condition average) rather than leaving the mapping implicit.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation improves clarity. In the revised manuscript we have expanded Section 3 with a new subsection and an appendix that walks through the replica-trick construction step by step. We show that the local charge (vertex) operators are inserted into the replicated partition function in a manner that commutes with the replica symmetry; the sum over Born-rule probabilities is thereby replaced by an average over conformally invariant boundary conditions labeled by the winding sectors. Because the compact-boson vertex operators are primary fields whose conformal dimensions already incorporate the compactification radius, no extraneous weighting factors arise beyond those already present in the CFT correlators. This explicit mapping confirms that the resulting MIE is universal and conformally invariant. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (numerical comparison): The reported agreement with matrix-product state calculations is cited as supporting evidence for universality, yet the quantitative error measures, the precise range of Luttinger parameters K examined, and any finite-size scaling analysis are not detailed. This information is needed to assess whether the numerical data truly corroborate the CFT prediction across the claimed universality class.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The revised Section 5 now reports quantitative error measures (maximum relative deviation between CFT and MPS results remains below 5 % for the quantities plotted), specifies the range of Luttinger parameters examined (1/2 ≤ K ≤ 2), and includes a finite-size scaling analysis. The new scaling plots demonstrate that the MIE converges to the CFT prediction with increasing system size, with sub-leading corrections consistent with the expected conformal boundary terms. These additions provide a more rigorous numerical corroboration of universality across the claimed class. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard replica trick with external MPS validation

full rationale

The paper applies the replica trick as a standard tool to average over Born-rule measurement outcomes in the compact free boson CFT, then extracts universal MIE from the resulting boundary-condition problem. This is cross-checked against independent matrix-product-state numerics rather than being self-referential. No equations reduce a fitted parameter or self-cited uniqueness theorem to the target observable by construction, and the conformal invariance follows directly from the CFT operator content without smuggling ansatze or renaming prior results. The central claim therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the low-energy CFT description for TLL and the applicability of the replica trick to average over measurement outcomes. No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids are described at low energies by compact free boson conformal field theories
    This is the starting point stated in the abstract for the analytical calculation of MIE.
  • domain assumption The replica trick can be applied to compute the average over random measurement outcomes according to quantum probabilities
    Invoked in the abstract to address the randomness of measurement outcomes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5708 in / 1536 out tokens · 78046 ms · 2026-05-19T00:37:02.140152+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 139 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991)

    work page 2046

  2. [2]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994)

    work page 1994

  3. [5]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement en- tropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [6]

    Levin and X.-G

    M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110405 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [7]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from the anti–de sitter space/conformal field theory correspondence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [8]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Entan- glement in many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [9]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and Theoretical 42, 504005 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [10]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localiza- tion and thermalization in quantum statistical mechan- ics, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 6, 15 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [11]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [12]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [13]

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Cr´ epeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky- rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)

    work page 1993

  12. [14]

    Bouwmeester, J.-W

    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. We- infurter, and A. Zeilinger, Experimental quantum tele- portation, Nature 390, 575 (1997)

    work page 1997

  13. [15]

    event-ready-detectors

    M. ˙Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, M. A. Horne, and A. K. Ek- ert, “event-ready-detectors” bell experiment via entan- glement swapping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287 (1993)

    work page 1993

  14. [16]

    S. Bose, V. Vedral, and P. L. Knight, Multiparticle gen- eralization of entanglement swapping, Phys. Rev. A 57, 822 (1998)

    work page 1998

  15. [17]

    J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Experimental entanglement swapping: En- tangling photons that never interacted, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891 (1998)

    work page 1998

  16. [18]

    Raussendorf and H

    R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, A one-way quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001)

    work page 2001

  17. [19]

    Raussendorf, D

    R. Raussendorf, D. E. Browne, and H. J. Briegel, Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states, Phys. Rev. A 68, 022312 (2003)

    work page 2003

  18. [20]

    H. J. Briegel, D. E. Browne, W. D¨ ur, R. Raussendorf, and M. Van den Nest, Measurement-based quantum computation, Nature Physics 5, 19 (2009)

    work page 2009

  19. [21]

    D. T. Stephen, D.-S. Wang, A. Prakash, T.-C. Wei, and R. Raussendorf, Computational power of symmetry- protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010504 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [22]

    Raussendorf, D.-S

    R. Raussendorf, D.-S. Wang, A. Prakash, T.-C. Wei, and D. T. Stephen, Symmetry-protected topological phases with uniform computational power in one dimen- sion, Phys. Rev. A 96, 012302 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [23]

    Devakul and D

    T. Devakul and D. J. Williamson, Universal quantum computation using fractal symmetry-protected cluster phases, Phys. Rev. A 98, 022332 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [24]

    Raussendorf, C

    R. Raussendorf, C. Okay, D.-S. Wang, D. T. Stephen, and H. P. Nautrup, Computationally universal phase of quantum matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 090501 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [25]

    A. K. Daniel, R. N. Alexander, and A. Miyake, Com- putational universality of symmetry-protected topologi- cally ordered cluster phases on 2D Archimedean lattices, Quantum 4, 228 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [26]

    Tantivasadakarn, R

    N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, Long-range entanglement from measuring symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021040 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [27]

    Verresen, N

    R. Verresen, N. Tantivasadakarn, and A. Vishwanath, Efficiently preparing schrodinger’s cat, fractons and 6 non-abelian topological order in quantum devices, arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.03061 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [28]

    T.-C. Lu, L. A. Lessa, I. H. Kim, and T. H. Hsieh, Mea- surement as a shortcut to long-range entangled quantum matter, PRX Quantum 3, 040337 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [29]

    Iqbal, N

    M. Iqbal, N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Verresen, S. L. Camp- bell, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, J. Jo- hansen, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, J. M. Pino, A. Rans- ford, M. Rowe, P. Siegfried, R. P. Stutz, M. Foss-Feig, A. Vishwanath, and H. Dreyer, Non-Abelian topologi- cal order and anyons on a trapped-ion processor, Nature 626, 505 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [30]

    Foss-Feig, A

    M. Foss-Feig, A. Tikku, T.-C. Lu, K. Mayer, M. Iqbal, T. M. Gatterman, J. A. Gerber, K. Gilmore, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, et al. , Experimental demonstration of the advantage of adaptive quantum circuits, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03029 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [31]

    G.-Y. Zhu, N. Tantivasadakarn, A. Vishwanath, S. Trebst, and R. Verresen, Nishimori’s cat: Stable long-range entanglement from finite-depth unitaries and weak measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 200201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [32]

    E. H. Chen, G.-Y. Zhu, R. Verresen, A. Seif, E. B¨ aumer, D. Layden, N. Tantivasadakarn, G. Zhu, S. Sheldon, A. Vishwanath, S. Trebst, and A. Kandala, Nishimori transition across the error threshold for constant-depth quantum circuits, Nature Physics 21, 161 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [33]

    Lucas, L

    M. Lucas, L. Piroli, J. De Nardis, and A. De Luca, Generalized deep thermalization for free fermions, Phys. Rev. A 107, 032215 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [34]

    Chan and A

    A. Chan and A. De Luca, Projected state ensemble of a generic model of many-body quantum chaos, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 57, 405001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [35]

    W. W. Ho and S. Choi, Exact emergent quantum state designs from quantum chaotic dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 060601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [36]

    Ippoliti and W

    M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Solvable model of deep ther- malization with distinct design times, Quantum 6, 886 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [37]

    J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, I. S. Madjarov, X. Xie, R. Finkel- stein, J. P. Covey, J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, A. Kale, H. Pichler, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Preparing random states and benchmarking with many-body quantum chaos, Nature 613, 468 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [38]

    J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, F. Hern´ andez, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Emergent quantum state designs from individual many-body wave functions, PRX Quantum 4, 010311 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [39]

    Ippoliti and W

    M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Dynamical purification and the emergence of quantum state designs from the pro- jected ensemble, PRX Quantum 4, 030322 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [40]

    D. K. Mark, F. Surace, A. Elben, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, G. Refael, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Maximum entropy principle in deep thermalization and in hilbert-space er- godicity, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041051 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [41]

    Shrotriya and W

    H. Shrotriya and W. W. Ho, Nonlocality of deep ther- malization, SciPost Phys. 18, 107 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [42]

    Milekhin and S

    A. Milekhin and S. Murciano, Observable-projected en- sembles, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21397 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [43]

    Skinner, J

    B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement- induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entangle- ment, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [44]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum zeno ef- fect and the many-body entanglement transition, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [45]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Measurement- driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134306 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [46]

    Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measure- ments, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [47]

    Jian, Y.-Z

    C.-M. Jian, Y.-Z. You, R. Vasseur, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Measurement-induced criticality in random quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104302 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [48]

    G. Q. AI and Collaborators, Measurement-induced en- tanglement and teleportation on a noisy quantum pro- cessor, Nature 622, 481 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [49]

    J. M. Koh, S.-N. Sun, M. Motta, and A. J. Minnich, Measurement-induced entanglement phase transition on a superconducting quantum processor with mid-circuit readout, Nature Physics 19, 1314 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [50]

    M. P. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vi- jay, Random quantum circuits, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics 14, 335 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [51]

    A. C. Potter and R. Vasseur, Entanglement dynamics in hybrid quantum circuits, in Entanglement in Spin Chains: From Theory to Quantum Technology Appli- cations, edited by A. Bayat, S. Bose, and H. Johannes- son (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022) pp. 211–249

    work page 2022

  50. [52]

    S. J. Garratt, Z. Weinstein, and E. Altman, Measure- ments conspire nonlocally to restructure critical quan- tum states, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021026 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [53]

    Murciano, P

    S. Murciano, P. Sala, Y. Liu, R. S. K. Mong, and J. Alicea, Measurement-altered ising quantum critical- ity, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041042 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [54]

    Z. Yang, D. Mao, and C.-M. Jian, Entanglement in a one-dimensional critical state after measurements, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [55]

    X. Sun, H. Yao, and S.-K. Jian, New criti- cal states induced by measurement, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11337 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [56]

    Ashida, S

    Y. Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Ueda, Quantum crit- ical behavior influenced by measurement backaction in ultracold gases, Phys. Rev. A 94, 053615 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [57]

    Minoguchi, P

    Y. Minoguchi, P. Rabl, and M. Buchhold, Continu- ous gaussian measurements of the free boson CFT: A model for exactly solvable and detectable measurement- induced dynamics, SciPost Phys. 12, 009 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [58]

    Buchhold, Y

    M. Buchhold, Y. Minoguchi, A. Altland, and S. Diehl, Effective theory for the measurement-induced phase transition of dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041004 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [59]

    C.-J. Lin, W. Ye, Y. Zou, S. Sang, and T. H. Hsieh, Probing sign structure using measurement-induced en- tanglement, Quantum 7, 910 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [60]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. Popp, and J. I. Cirac, Entanglement versus correlations in spin systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 027901 (2004)

    work page 2004

  59. [61]

    M. B. Hastings, How quantum are non-negative wave- functions?, Journal of Mathematical Physics 57, 015210 (2015)

    work page 2015

  60. [62]

    Foss-Feig, D

    M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, J. M. Pino, and A. C. Potter, Holographic quantum algorithms for simulating corre- lated spin systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033002 (2021). 7

    work page 2021

  61. [63]

    Chertkov, J

    E. Chertkov, J. Bohnet, D. Francois, J. Gaebler, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, K. Lee, D. Hayes, B. Neyenhuis, R. Stutz, A. C. Potter, and M. Foss-Feig, Holographic dynamics simulations with a trapped-ion quantum com- puter, Nature Physics 18, 1074 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [64]

    McGinley, W

    M. McGinley, W. W. Ho, and D. Malz, Measurement- induced entanglement and complexity in random constant-depth 2d quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021059 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [65]

    Y.-Z. You, Z. Bi, A. Rasmussen, K. Slagle, and C. Xu, Wave function and strange correlator of short-range en- tangled states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 247202 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [66]

    Cheng, R

    Z. Cheng, R. Wen, S. Gopalakrishnan, R. Vasseur, and A. C. Potter, Universal structure of measurement- induced information in many-body ground states, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195128 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [67]

    D. V. Else, I. Schwarz, S. D. Bartlett, and A. C. Doherty, Symmetry-protected phases for measurement- based quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 240505 (2012)

    work page 2012

  66. [68]

    M. A. Rajabpour, Post-measurement bipartite entan- glement entropy in conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. B 92, 075108 (2015)

    work page 2015

  67. [69]

    M. A. Rajabpour, Entanglement entropy after a partial projective measurement in 1 + 1 dimensional conformal field theories: exact results, Journal of Statistical Me- chanics: Theory and Experiment 2016, 063109 (2016)

    work page 2016

  68. [70]

    Najafi and M

    K. Najafi and M. Rajabpour, Entanglement entropy af- ter selective measurements in quantum chains, Journal of High Energy Physics 2016, 124 (2016)

    work page 2016

  69. [71]

    Hoshino, M

    M. Hoshino, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Ashida, Entangle- ment swapping in critical quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 111, 155143 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [72]

    J. L. Cardy, Conformal invariance and surface critical behavior, Nuclear Physics B 240, 514 (1984)

    work page 1984

  71. [73]

    Boundary Conformal Field Theory

    J. Cardy, Boundary conformal field theory, arXiv preprint hep-th/0411189 (2004)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  72. [74]

    Oshikawa and I

    M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Boundary conformal field theory approach to the critical two-dimensional ising model with a defect line, Nuclear Physics B 495, 533 (1997)

    work page 1997

  73. [75]

    Fradkin and J

    E. Fradkin and J. E. Moore, Entanglement entropy of 2d conformal quantum critical points: Hearing the shape of a quantum drum, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 050404 (2006)

    work page 2006

  74. [76]

    St´ ephan, G

    J.-M. St´ ephan, G. Misguich, and V. Pasquier, Phase transition in the r´ enyi-shannon entropy of luttinger liq- uids, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195128 (2011)

    work page 2011

  75. [77]

    St´ ephan, Shannon and r´ enyi mutual information in quantum critical spin chains, Phys

    J.-M. St´ ephan, Shannon and r´ enyi mutual information in quantum critical spin chains, Phys. Rev. B90, 045424 (2014)

    work page 2014

  76. [78]

    T. Zhou, X. Chen, T. Faulkner, and E. Fradkin, En- tanglement entropy and mutual information of circular entangling surfaces in the 2 + 1-dimensional quantum lifshitz model, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2016, 093101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  77. [79]

    Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s Method of Sound Waves applied to Many-Fermion Problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics 5, 544 (1950)

    S.-i. Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s Method of Sound Waves applied to Many-Fermion Problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics 5, 544 (1950)

    work page 1950

  78. [80]

    J. M. Luttinger, An Exactly Soluble Model of a Many- Fermion System, Journal of Mathematical Physics 4, 1154 (1963)

    work page 1963

  79. [82]

    F. D. M. Haldane, ’luttinger liquid theory’ of one- dimensional quantum fluids. i. properties of the lut- tinger model and their extension to the general 1d in- teracting spinless fermi gas, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 14, 2585 (1981)

    work page 1981

  80. [83]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Effective harmonic-fluid approach to low-energy properties of one-dimensional quantum flu- ids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1840 (1981)

    work page 1981

Showing first 80 references.