Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Whither symbols in the era of advanced neural networks?

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering can directly observe a spin current in a magnetic insulator, with momentum and energy resolution.

desk verdict The metadata doesn't match the manuscript, but the actual paper—Gu et al. on RIXS of magnon spin currents—is a genuinely new measurement whose central number rests on one untested geometric assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05776 v1 pith:5IKEPLND submitted 2025-08-07 cs.AI

Thomas L. Griffiths , Brenden M. Lake , R. Thomas McCoy , Ellie Pavlick , Taylor W. Webb This is my paper
classification cs.AI
keywords spincurrentmagnontransportresonantinelasticx-rayscatteringyttriumirongarnetSeebeckeffectrelaxationtimemomentum-resolvedspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports what it calls the first direct observation of a spin current with energy and momentum resolution, using resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) on the magnetic insulator yttrium iron garnet (YIG). When a temperature gradient drives magnons—the quanta of spin waves—from hot to cold, the RIXS intensity at opposite momenta changes in opposite directions, and the paper reads that sign-reversing asymmetry as a shift of the magnon distribution out of equilibrium. Fitting the asymmetry with a linearized Boltzmann equation gives a momentum-resolved magnon transport relaxation time of $\tau_q = 58 \pm 4$ ns at $\mathbf{q} = [0.2, 0.2, 0.2]$ r.l.u. Spin currents have usually been inferred indirectly from voltages in attached metals, so a direct bulk-sensitive measurement would supply a missing transport parameter and open a route to mapping magnon lifetimes across the Brillouin zone.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the magnetic RIXS cross-section, which is proportional to the magnon occupation $f(\mathbf{q})$: magnon creation appears with weight $f(\mathbf{q})+1$ and annihilation with weight $f(\mathbf{q})$. Under a temperature gradient the non-equilibrium occupation is written as a linearized Boltzmann shift, $f(\mathbf{q})-f_0(\mathbf{q}) = \frac{\tau_q}{T}\frac{\hbar\omega_q}{k_B T}\frac{e^{\hbar\omega_q/(k_B T)}}{(e^{\hbar\omega_q/(k_B T)}-1)^2}\,\mathbf{v}_q\cdot\nabla T$, so the intensity difference between $\mathbf{q}$ and $-\mathbf{q}$ is directly proportional to $\tau_q$ times the group velocity along the gradient. This converts a spectral asymmetry into a transpor

What would settle it

Reverse the temperature gradient by swapping the heater and cold source while keeping the scattering geometry fixed, and remeasure the $\pm\mathbf{q}$ intensities: a genuine magnon spin current should reverse the sign of the asymmetry, while a geometry- or roughness-driven intensity difference would remain unchanged.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that RIXS intensity is sensitive enough to see the small non-equilibrium changes in magnon occupation that constitute a spin current. In YIG under a temperature gradient along [111], the ~10 meV acoustic-magnon peak grows at $\mathbf{q} = +0.2$ r.l.u. and shrinks at the opposite momentum, linearly with temperature difference, while a control sample without a gradient shows no such change. The paper argues this $\pm\mathbf{q}$ asymmetry is the spectroscopic fingerprint of a shifted magnon distribution. Fitting the asymmetry with the linearized Boltzmann equation and the acoustic dispersion $\varepsilon(q) = \varepsilon_0 + Dq^2$ yields $\tau_q = 58 \pm 4$ ns at $|\mathbf{

Load-bearing premise

The spin-current reading is the difference in RIXS intensity at two opposite momenta, and that difference is interpreted as a shift in the magnon distribution only because the two scattering geometries are assumed to scatter with equal efficiency; if one geometry is favored by surface roughness, beam projection, or cross-section, the resulting bias would mimic a spin current.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Magnon relaxation times can now be measured at finite momentum, not just near the Brillouin-zone center, giving input for computing momentum-resolved magnon thermal conductivity and the intrinsic spin Seebeck coefficient.
  • RIXS can in principle map $\tau_q$ across the Brillouin zone, producing a tomography of the scattering rates that govern macroscopic spin and heat transport in magnetic insulators.
  • Because RIXS is bulk-sensitive, the method can separate bulk magnon flow from interface and magnon-accumulation effects that dominate indirect detection schemes.
  • The same approach can be applied to other magnetic materials, thin films, and van der Waals magnets to guide magnonic device design.
  • The technique generalizes to other chargeless currents—phonons, excitons, orbitons, polarons—by detecting their non-equilibrium distributions at finite momentum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the proportionality between RIXS intensity and $f(\mathbf{q})$ holds at every momentum, the ratio of opposite-momentum intensities under a known gradient could be calibrated as a quantitative, momentum-resolved magnon-occupation thermometer.
  • The extracted $\tau_q = 58$ ns at $q = 0.2$ r.l.u. is orders of magnitude shorter than the 2–60 µs lifetimes reported near the zone center; mapping intermediate momenta could reveal which decay channels open as magnon energy increases.
  • A natural next experiment is to swap the heater and cold source while keeping the RIXS geometry fixed: the asymmetry should reverse sign if it is genuinely the spin current, and a geometric artifact would not.
  • Because the technique needs no heavy-metal transducer, it could test magnon devices in geometries where electrical contacts would disturb the transport being measured.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) measurements on a yttrium iron garnet (YIG) spin-Seebeck device under applied temperature gradients. At T = 80 K, the acoustic magnon peak intensity at q = +0.2 r.l.u. increases with ΔT, while at q = −0.2 r.l.u. it decreases. The authors interpret this sign-reversing asymmetry as the non-equilibrium magnon distribution shift expected for a magnon spin current, and fit the data with a linearized Boltzmann equation to extract τq = 58 ± 4 ns at |q| = 0.2 r.l.u. The paper also presents the V_SSE response, hot/cold-point control measurements, and a reference-sample temperature check.

Significance. If the interpretation holds, this would be the first momentum- and energy-resolved direct measurement of a magnon spin current, addressing a long-standing need in magnon spintronics. The qualitative sign-reversal of the difference signal under ±q is a strong and rather generic prediction of the spin-Seebeck picture, and it is supported by several internal controls (linearity in ΔT, 80 K vs 300 K comparison, hot/cold-point measurements, reference-sample temperature dependence). These are genuine strengths. However, the quantitative extraction of τq depends on (i) a single RIXS cross-section scale assumed equal for two different scattering geometries, and (ii) a treatment of the Stokes intensity that omits the f+1 factor. Both issues directly bias the headline number, so the quantitative claim is not yet supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Title/Abstract] The manuscript is internally inconsistent at the framing level: the abstract and title describe arguments about symbolic systems in neural networks, while the full text is a condensed-matter RIXS study of magnon spin currents in YIG. This is not a minor wording issue; the paper does not present the results promised by its abstract. The correct abstract for the physics content must be substituted, and the title should be reconciled.
  2. [Methods, Eq. 10] Eq. 10 sets A_q = I0 f(q). However, the Stokes scattering intensity in Eq. 1 is proportional to f(q)+1. At T = 80 K and the acoustic magnon energy (~14 meV), f0 ≈ 0.15, so the omitted +1 changes the baseline by a factor of about 7.7. The difference signals ΔA cancel the +1, but the fit in Fig. 4d uses absolute A_q values, so both I0 and τq are biased. The authors must refit with A_q = I0(1 + f0 + δf) or explicitly justify why the spontaneous-emission term is absorbed without affecting τq.
  3. [Methods, 'Fitting of the RIXS data'] The conversion of the ±q asymmetry into τq relies on the assumption that the RIXS geometrical factor I0 is identical for θin = 90° and θin = 60°. The paper states this assumption and immediately notes a geometry-dependent surface-roughness contribution to the elastic line. A geometry-dependent magnon cross-section would bias the single-I0 fit of τq. No ΔT = 0 spectrum at 80 K was recorded for q−0.2 (the device cannot reach equilibrium at 80 K), so I0(90)/I0(60) is uncalibrated. Please provide equilibrium spectra on the reference sample in both geometries, or fit with independent I0± and report the resulting uncertainty on τq.
  4. [Fig. 4d / Eq. 10] No goodness-of-fit or residuals are reported for the two-parameter fit that yields τq = 58 ± 4 ns. Given the large ΔT values (up to 24.8 K at 80 K), δf is not a small perturbation of f0 (δf/f0 ≈ 0.6 at the largest gradient), so the linearized Boltzmann expression may be invalid. Please show the fit quality, the residuals, and justify the linear regime quantitatively.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and main text] The abstract states 'a pure spin current has never been measured directly,' but the main text acknowledges direct XMCD detection of spin currents (Refs. 13–14). Qualify the claim to 'never measured with energy and momentum resolution.'
  2. [Main text, 'Spin current under temperature gradient'] The word 'unequivocally' is too strong given the uncalibrated I0 issue discussed above; 'consistent with' would be more appropriate.
  3. [Methods, 'Parameters for magnon distribution'] The model in Fig. 4c uses the fitted τq = 58 ns as a 'starting value'; this should be labeled as using the extracted value, not as an input to the analysis.
  4. [Figure captions] Typographical errors: 'scatterred' in Extended Data Fig. 2 caption, and the run-on sentence in the Fig. 3 caption ('Our device set-up (see Methods), does not allow...').
  5. [Data availability] The statement 'available upon reasonable request' is less transparent than depositing the processed RIXS data in a public repository; consider making the data available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ±q RIXS asymmetry is an observed output and τq is fit from the data, not assumed; the geometry-factor assumption is an external-validity concern, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central observation is an asymmetry in the RIXS intensity between q=+0.2 and q=-0.2 r.l.u. that grows with ΔT. The Boltzmann expression (Eqs. 3 and 9) is a standard linearized transport model, and Eq. 10 writes the measured integrated acoustic-magnon intensity as A_q = I0 f(q). Fitting Eq. 10 to A_q for both momenta with I0 and τq as free parameters makes τq = 58 ± 4 ns an output of the data, not an input; the sign asymmetry itself is independent of τq and follows from the ν_q·∇T term. The later use of the fitted τq in Eqs. 15-16 to evaluate current densities is a numerical application of standard definitions, not a prediction of the same data. The Methods assumption that the geometrical factor does not significantly change between the θ_in = 90° and θ_in = 60° configurations is a validity condition for converting the asymmetry into a transport measurement; if false, the asymmetry could be contaminated, but that is a threat to experimental control, not a circular reduction of the conclusion into its premises. Some cited works involve co-authors (e.g., Refs. 25, 44, 51, 52), but the Boltzmann linearization is independently standard and the spin-wave stiffness and dispersion are taken from external YIG literature, so no load-bearing premise is justified only by a self-citation. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are introduced. The paper relies on standard magnon transport theory and on several stated experimental assumptions. The extracted tau_q and the calibration scale I0 are fitted parameters; all other inputs (D, g, sample length, temperatures) come from literature or direct measurement.

free parameters (2)
  • magnon relaxation time tau_q = 58 +/- 4 ns
    Fitted as the slope parameter in Eq. 10 from the RIXS acoustic magnon intensities A_q0.2 and A_q-0.2 versus Delta-T at T = 80 K. This is the paper's main extracted result, not a prediction.
  • RIXS intensity scale factor I0 = not reported
    Proportionality constant between the RIXS intensity and the magnon distribution f(q) in Eq. 10; fitted jointly with tau_q because RIXS is not absolutely calibrated.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Magnetic RIXS cross section is proportional to the magnon distribution function f(q) (Eq. 1) with a single proportionality factor.
    Used to translate observed Stokes/anti-Stokes intensities into magnon occupations; the proportionality is asserted and its constancy across the two geometries is assumed in Methods.
  • domain assumption Linearized Boltzmann equation with relaxation time approximation (Eqs. 3, 5, 9).
    Standard kinetic model for magnon transport, taken from Ref. 44 (co-authored by G.E.W. Bauer); the fit of A_q vs Delta-T is based on this equation.
  • domain assumption Parabolic, isotropic acoustic magnon dispersion epsilon(q) = epsilon0 + D q^2 with D = 7.42e-40 J m^2 (Eq. 7).
    Used at q = 0.2 r.l.u. to compute group velocities and the analytic form of the distribution shift; non-parabolic corrections are asserted to be weak.
  • domain assumption Magnon and phonon systems are in local equilibrium (T_m = T_p = T), so the chemical potential gradient term drops out of Eq. 5.
    Needed to simplify the Boltzmann equation to Eq. 6 and identify the measured signal purely with the temperature gradient.
  • domain assumption Magnon accumulation/depletion is negligible at the measurement point (160 um from the cold edge, relaxation length lambda <= 10 um).
    Extended Data Fig. 3 calculates rho(x) with lambda = 2 and 10 um and concludes the measured intensity variation is from the gradient, not edge accumulation.
  • domain assumption The RIXS geometric factor does not change between the two scattering configurations (theta_in = 60 deg and 90 deg).
    Stated in Methods: needed so that a single I0 can be used for both q0.2 and q-0.2 in the fit; if false, the observed asymmetry could be geometric.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Whither symbols in the era of advanced neural networks?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5IKEPLND

@misc{pith2026250805776,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Whither symbols in the era of advanced neural networks?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5IKEPLND}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05776}
}
read the original abstract

Some of the strongest evidence that human minds should be thought about in terms of symbolic systems has been the way they combine ideas, produce novelty, and learn quickly. We argue that modern neural networks -- and the artificial intelligence systems built upon them -- exhibit similar abilities. This undermines the argument that the cognitive processes and representations used by human minds are symbolic, although the fact that these neural networks are typically trained on data generated by symbolic systems illustrates that such systems play an important role in characterizing the abstract problems that human minds have to solve. This argument leads us to offer a new agenda for research on the symbolic basis of human thought.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Binding Visual Features Point by Point

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training VLMs to point via text induces serial processing that eliminates binding errors and enables compositional generalization on multi-object tasks.

  2. Emergent Structured Representations Support Flexible In-Context Inference in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs dynamically construct and causally rely on structured conceptual subspaces in middle-to-late layers for in-context inference.

  3. How Do Language Models Compose Functions?

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs solve compositional factual recall either by computing intermediates or directly, with mechanism choice correlated to translation geometry in embedding spaces.

  4. The New Associationism: Lessons from Deep Learning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Supervised learning across AI systems vindicates a uniform error-driven associationism for cognition, though operating inside advanced computational structures beyond classical associationist models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    & Xie, X.-C

    Han, W., Maekawa, S. & Xie, X.-C. Spin current as a probe of quantum materials. Nat. Mater. 19, 139–152 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    T., Lebedev, D., Song, T

    Gish, J. T., Lebedev, D., Song, T. W., Sangwan, V. K. & Hersam, M. C. Van der Waals opto-spintronics. Nat. Electron.7, 336–347 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    Equation 5 then simplifies to: f (q) − f0(q) = τq T ℏωq kBT eℏωq/(kBT ) (eℏωq/(kBT ) − 1)2 νq · ∇T, (6) While magnon dispersion in YIG is complex (see Fig

    Since at high temperature the magnon and phonon scattering is strong, they are at local equilibrium with Tm = Tp = T . Equation 5 then simplifies to: f (q) − f0(q) = τq T ℏωq kBT eℏωq/(kBT ) (eℏωq/(kBT ) − 1)2 νq · ∇T, (6) While magnon dispersion in YIG is complex (see Fig. 1 d in the main text), only the magnons up to THz are mobile and contribute to tra...

    work page

  4. [4]

    & Chen, G

    Qian, X., Zhou, J. & Chen, G. Phonon-engineered extreme thermal conductivity materials. Nat. Mater. 20, 1188–1202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    & Diebold, U

    Franchini, C., Reticcioli, M., Setvin, M. & Diebold, U. Polarons in materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 560–586 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Choi, Y.-G. et al. Observation of the orbital Hall effect in a light metal Ti. Nature 619, 52–56 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Dyakonov, M. I. & Perel, V. I. Current-induced spin orientation of electrons in semiconductors. Physics Letters A35, 459-460 (1971)

    work page 1971

  8. [8]

    Uchida, K. et al. Observation of the spin Seebeck effect. Nature 455, 778–781 (2008)

    2008

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    E., Saitoh, E

    Bauer, G. E., Saitoh, E. & Van Wees, B. J. Spin caloritronics. Nat. Mater. 11, 391–399 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Overlooked contribution to the Hall effect in ferromagnetic metals

    Hirsch, J. Overlooked contribution to the Hall effect in ferromagnetic metals. Phys. Rev. B 60, 14787 (1999)

    1999

  3. [11]

    & Tatara, G

    Saitoh, E., Ueda, M., Miyajima, H. & Tatara, G. Conversion of spin current into charge current at room temperature: inverse spin-Hall effect. Appl. Phys. Lett.88, 182509 (2006)

    2006

  4. [12]

    Rezende, S. M. Fundamentals of magnonics, vol. 969 (Springer, 2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    I., Serga, A

    Pirro, P., Vasyuchka, V. I., Serga, A. A. & Hillebrands, B. Advances in coherent magnonics. Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 1114–1135 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Kukreja, R. et al. X-ray detection of transient magnetic moments induced by a spin current in Cu. Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 096601 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Li, J. et al. Direct detection of pure ac spin current by x-ray pump-probe measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 076602 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    & Hillebrands, B

    Serga, A., Chumak, A. & Hillebrands, B. YIG magnonics. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.43, 264002 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    Uchida, K. et al. Longitudinal spin Seebeck effect: from fundamentals to applications. J. Condens. Matter Phys.26, 343202 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Kehlberger, A. et al. Length scale of the spin Seebeck effect. Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 096602 (2015). 26

    2015

  11. [19]

    Guo, E.-J. et al. Influence of thickness and interface on the low-temperature enhancement of the spin Seebeck effect in YIG films. Phys. Rev. X6, 031012 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Ament, L. J. P., van Veenendaal, M., Devereaux, T. P., Hill, J. P. & van den Brink, J. Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering studies of elementary excitations. Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 705–767 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    Haverkort, M. W. Theory of resonant inelastic x-ray scattering by collective magnetic excita- tions. Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 167404 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    Olsson, K. S. et al. Pure spin current and magnon chemical potential in a nonequilibrium magnetic insulator. Phys. Rev. X10, 021029 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    & Vardeny, Z

    McLaughlin, R., Sun, D., Zhang, C., Groesbeck, M. & Vardeny, Z. V. Optical detection of transverse spin-Seebeck effect in permalloy film using Sagnac interferometer microscopy. Phys. Rev. B95, 180401 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    V., Vasyuchka, V

    Chumak, A. V., Vasyuchka, V. I., Serga, A. A. & Hillebrands, B. Magnon spintronics. Nat. Phys. 11, 453–461 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Pelliciari, J. et al. Tuning spin excitations in magnetic films by confinement. Nat. Mater.20, 188–193 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Gu, Y. et al. Site-specific electronic and magnetic excitations of the skyrmion material Cu2OSeO3. Commun. Phys. 5, 156 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Bisogni, V. et al. Femtosecond dynamics of momentum-dependent magnetic excitations from resonant inelastic x-ray scattering in CaCu 2O3. Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 147401 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Jia, C. et al. Persistent spin excitations in doped antiferromagnets revealed by resonant inelastic light scattering. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–7 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Robarts, H. C. et al. Dynamical spin susceptibility in La 2CuO4 studied by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering. Phys. Rev. B103, 224427 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    & Devereaux, T

    Jia, C., Wohlfeld, K., Wang, Y., Moritz, B. & Devereaux, T. P. Using RIXS to uncover elementary charge and spin excitations. Phys. Rev. X6, 021020 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    et al.Magnetic contrast at spin-flip excitations: An advanced x-ray spectroscopy tool to study magnetic-ordering

    Elnaggar, H. et al.Magnetic contrast at spin-flip excitations: An advanced x-ray spectroscopy tool to study magnetic-ordering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces.11, 36213–36220 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Princep, A. J. et al. The full magnon spectrum of yttrium iron garnet. npj Quantum Mater. 2, 1–5 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Li, J. et al. Single- and multimagnon dynamics in antiferromagnetic α−Fe2O3 thin films. Phys. Rev. X13, 011012 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Nambu, Y. et al. Observation of magnon polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 027201 (2020). 27

    2020

  27. [35]

    Chang, H. et al. Role of damping in spin Seebeck effect in yttrium iron garnet thin films. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601614 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Uchida, K. et al. Thermal spin pumping and magnon-phonon-mediated spin-Seebeck effect. J. Appl. Phys.111, 103903 (2012)

    2012

  29. [37]

    Jaworski, C. et al. Observation of the spin-Seebeck effect in a ferromagnetic semiconductor. Nat. Mater. 9, 898–903 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    Kikkawa, T. et al. Critical suppression of spin Seebeck effect by magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B 92, 064413 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    Lee, W. et al. Asymmetry of collective excitations in electron-and hole-doped cuprate super- conductors. Nat. Phys. 10, 883–889 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors

    Dai, P. Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 855–896 (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    & Saitoh, E

    Iguchi, R., Uchida, K.-i., Daimon, S. & Saitoh, E. Concomitant enhancement of the lon- gitudinal spin Seebeck effect and the thermal conductivity in a Pt/YIG/Pt system at low temperatures. Phys. Rev. B95, 174401 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Baron, A. Q. R. Recent progress in non-resonant inelastic x-ray scattering. https://www.bnl. gov/ixs2019/files/talks/wednesday/alfredbaron.pdf. 11th International Conference on Inelastic X-Ray Scattering (IXS 2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Adachi, H. et al. Gigantic enhancement of spin Seebeck effect by phonon drag. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 252506 (2010)

    2010

  36. [44]

    Rezende, S. M. et al. Magnon spin-current theory for the longitudinal spin-Seebeck effect. Phys. Rev. B89, 014416 (2014)

    2014

  37. [45]

    J., Peters, K

    Cornelissen, L. J., Peters, K. J. H., Bauer, G. E. W., Duine, R. A. & van Wees, B. J. Magnon spin transport driven by the magnon chemical potential in a magnetic insulator. Phys. Rev. B 94, 014412 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    M., Azevedo, A

    Rezende, S. M., Azevedo, A. & Rodr ´ ıguez-Su´ arez, R. L. Magnon diffusion theory for the spin Seebeck effect in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic insulators. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.51, 174004 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    Boona, S. R. & Heremans, J. P. Magnon thermal mean free path in yttrium iron garnet. Phys. Rev. B90, 064421 (2014)

    2014

  40. [48]

    Jamison, J. S. et al. Long lifetime of thermally excited magnons in bulk yttrium iron garnet. Phys. Rev. B100, 134402 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    A., Serga, A

    R¨ uckriegel, A., Kopietz, P., Bozhko, D. A., Serga, A. A. & Hillebrands, B. Magnetoelastic modes and lifetime of magnons in thin yttrium iron garnet films. Phys. Rev. B 89, 184413 28 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    Wei, X.-Y. et al. Giant magnon spin conductivity in ultrathin yttrium iron garnet films. Nat. Mater. 21, 1352–1356 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Kubacka, T. et al. Large-amplitude spin dynamics driven by a THz pulse in resonance with an electromagnon. Science 343, 1333–1336 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    & Bauer, G

    Barker, J. & Bauer, G. E. W. Thermal spin dynamics of yttrium iron garnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217201 (2016)

    2016

  45. [53]

    & Bauer, G

    Barker, J. & Bauer, G. E. W. Semiquantum thermodynamics of complex ferrimagnets. Phys. Rev. B 100, 140401 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Vasili, H. B. et al. Direct observation of multivalent states and 4 f → 3d charge transfer in Ce-doped yttrium iron garnet thin films. Phys. Rev. B96, 014433 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    & Leonhardt, W

    Dvorak, J., Jarrige, I., Bisogni, V., Coburn, S. & Leonhardt, W. Towards 10 mev resolution: The design of an ultrahigh resolution soft x-ray RIXS spectrometer. Rev. Sci. Instrum.87, 115109 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    Manley, M. E. et al. Intrinsic anharmonic localization in thermoelectric PbSe. Nat. Commun. 10, 1928 (2019)

    1928

  49. [57]

    Boschini, F. et al. Dynamic electron correlations with charge order wavelength along all directions in the copper oxide plane. Nat. Commun. 12, 597 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    & Shamoto, S.-i

    Nambu, Y. & Shamoto, S.-i. Neutron scattering study on yttrium iron garnet for spintronics. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.90, 081002 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Tomiyasu, K. et al. Coulomb correlations intertwined with spin and orbital excitations in LaCoO3. Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 196402 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    M., V´ elez, S., Hueso, L

    Gomez-Perez, J. M., V´ elez, S., Hueso, L. E. & Casanova, F. Differences in the magnon diffusion length for electrically and thermally driven magnon currents in Y 3Fe5O12. Phys. Rev. B 101, 184420 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Ganzhorn, K. et al. Temperature dependence of the non-local spin Seebeck effect in YIG/Pt nanostructures. AIP Adv.7, 085102 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    Prakash, A. et al. Evidence for the role of the magnon energy relaxation length in the spin Seebeck effect. Phys. Rev. B97, 020408 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    Y., Hu, J., Wu, R

    Qu, D., Huang, S. Y., Hu, J., Wu, R. & Chien, C. L. Intrinsic spin Seebeck effect in Au /YIG. Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 067206 (2013)

    2013

  56. [64]

    O., Padr´ on-Hern´ andez, E., Azevedo, A

    Cunha, R. O., Padr´ on-Hern´ andez, E., Azevedo, A. & Rezende, S. M. Controlling the relaxation of propagating spin waves in yttrium iron garnet/Pt bilayers with thermal gradients. Phys. Rev. B 87, 184401 (2013). 29

    2013

  57. [65]

    Shan, J. et al. Influence of yttrium iron garnet thickness and heater opacity on the nonlocal transport of electrically and thermally excited magnons. Phys. Rev. B94, 174437 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    Zhang, S. S.-L. & Zhang, S. Magnon mediated electric current drag across a ferromagnetic insulator layer. Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 096603 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    Zhang, S. S.-L. & Zhang, S. Spin convertance at magnetic interfaces. Phys. Rev. B86, 214424 (2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    Rezende, S. M. & L´ opez Ortiz, J. C. Thermal properties of magnons in yttrium iron garnet at elevated magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B91, 104416 (2015)

    2015

  61. [69]

    de Groot, F. M. F., Kuiper, P. & Sawatzky, G. A. Local spin-flip spectral distribution obtained by resonant x-ray Raman scattering. Phys. Rev. B57, 14584–14587 (1998)

    1998

  62. [70]

    & Maekawa, S

    Adachi, H., Uchida, K.-i., Saitoh, E. & Maekawa, S. Theory of the spin Seebeck effect. Rep. Prog. Phys.76, 036501 (2013)

    2013

  63. [71]

    & Azevedo, A

    Rezende, S., Rodr ´ ıguez-Su´ arez, R., Cunha, R., L´ opez Ortiz, J. & Azevedo, A. Bulk magnon spin current theory for the longitudinal spin Seebeck effect. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 400, 171–177 (2016)

    2016

  64. [72]

    & Azevedo, A

    Rezende, S., Rodr ´ ıguez-Su´ arez, R., Lopez Ortiz, J. & Azevedo, A. Thermal properties of magnons and the spin Seebeck effect in yttrium iron garnet/normal metal hybrid structures. Phys. Rev. B89, 134406 (2014)

    2014

  65. [73]

    & Rezende, S

    Ratkovski, D., Balicas, L., Bangura, A., Machado, F. & Rezende, S. Thermal transport in yttrium iron garnet at very high magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B101, 174442 (2020). 30

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.