Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 53 references

Engineering snags for spatial curvature in weaves: Fabrication, mechanics, and inverse design

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that deliberately pulled-out ribbons, called snags, turn flat plain weaves into programmable 3D surfaces, and that an inverse design can find the snag pattern to match a target shape.

desk verdict The snag-as-design-element idea is new and well demonstrated with physical prototypes and a workable inverse design pipeline, but the 'arbitrary target surfaces' claim is overbroad and the model calibration needs cross-validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06673 v1 pith:EKWA3W3H submitted 2025-08-08 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-phphysics.comp-phphysics.pop-ph

classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-phphysics.comp-phphysics.pop-ph
keywords snagsplainweavesspatialcurvaturegeometricfrustrationbarandhingemodelinversedesigngeneticalgorithmwovenexoskeletons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a dense plain weave of straight ribbons can be bent into complex spatial curves by purposely creating local defects it calls snags. These snags, made by pulling two crossing ribbons out of the weave and securing them with a circumferential ribbon, create geometric frustration that spreads through the interlacing and produces a smooth global curvature. The authors build a reduced-order bar-and-hinge model that predicts the rest shape from a binary snag pattern, derive scaling laws showing how curvature depends on sheet size, ribbon thickness, and material stiffness, and then use a genetic algorithm to inversely compute snag patterns that approximate arbitrary target surfaces. The result matters because it offers a simple route to curved woven structures without curved ribbons, triaxial patterns, or molding, with demonstrated applications to woven exoskeletons that fit a human leg and elbow.

What carries the argument

The snag unit is the central object: two adjacent ribbons pulled out of the weave plane and re-secured by a circumferential ribbon, converting a flat local interlacing into an out-of-plane protrusion that propagates force through neighboring interlacing. The forward model is a bar-and-hinge discretization of the weave, with bending hinges (type I along the ribbon, type II for twisting) and stretching bars, whose stiffnesses are calibrated by constants CB and CA. The rest shape is found by a self-morphing technique that incrementally relaxes hinge rest angles to π. The inverse design uses a binary snag vector and a genetic algorithm whose fitness combines Hausdorff distance to the target with

What would settle it

Fabricate the same snag pattern in Mylar ribbons of, for example, 0.1 mm, 0.1905 mm, and 0.5 mm thickness, scan the rest shapes, and compare the measured curvature to the predicted symmetric-snag law κ ∝ t^(1/3) or the strip-snag behavior κy ∝ t^(-1/3). If the curvature systematically deviates from these exponents, or if the rest shape changes when the ribbon's Young's modulus is varied, the model's predictive claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A local snag—two neighboring ribbons pulled out of the interlacing plane and held by a circumferential ribbon—breaks the local flat arrangement and forces the adjacent ribbons to deform through an action-reaction force pair. This perturbation propagates through the entire weave, giving an originally flat sheet a dome-like or directionally biased curvature. By varying the size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of snags, the global form of a 2D or 3D plain weave can be tuned. The bar-and-hinge model, with two calibrated constants, reproduces scanned physical prototypes, and the scaling laws show that curvature decays only as (M/N)^(-1/3) with surface size, grows or shrinks with ribbon thick

Load-bearing premise

The reduced-order bar-and-hinge model, calibrated once on a few experimental rest shapes and stiffness measurements, accurately predicts the rest shape of any new snag pattern, including the inverse-designed ones, without recalibration.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Curved woven shells can be made from straight ribbons at scale, without curved-ribbon fabrication, triaxial patterns, or molding processes.
  • Snag size, shape, and layout become design variables; sparse snags can produce persistent curvature because the influence decays only as (M/N)^(-1/3) with surface size.
  • The rest shape is independent of the ribbon's Young's modulus, so material can be chosen for stiffness, cost, or function without changing the resulting form.
  • The binary snag encoding is compatible with automated weaving and with digital optimization, enabling custom-fit wearables and exoskeletons from scanned body geometry.
  • The scaling laws provide simple design rules: for symmetric snags, thicker ribbons increase curvature, while for strip snags, thicker ribbons increase curvature about the stiff axis but decrease it about the flexible axis.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The E-independence of the rest shape suggests that the same snag pattern could be used with active or responsive ribbon materials to change force response while preserving shape, or conversely, if rest angles could be actuated, the weave could morph between target shapes.
  • The slow (M/N)^(-1/3) decay hints that snag-enabled curvature could persist on architectural scales, allowing sparse defect patterns to shape large woven or cable-net structures without dense snag coverage.
  • The t^(-1/3) divergence for the flexible axis in non-symmetric snags suggests that very thin ribbons would produce a near-kink, which could be exploited as a tunable hinge or fold in woven sheets.
  • The binary snag representation and fitness-based search could be extended to finer meshes or larger surfaces using surrogate models or learned inverse mapping, potentially outpacing the genetic algorithm's 100-generation budget.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a fabrication strategy for programmable spatial curvature in dense plain weaves by introducing local 'snags' (pulled-out ribbons). It demonstrates the approach on 2D sheets and on initially 3D woven surfaces, attributes the resulting global curvature to propagating geometric frustration, and presents a reduced-order bar & hinge model for simulating the rest shapes. Scaling relationships with surface size, snag size, ribbon thickness, and Young's modulus are reported, and an evolutionary inverse-design framework is used to map binary snag patterns to target surfaces, with leg and elbow exoskeleton demonstrations. The paper's central claims are that local snags generate global curvature in a predictable way and that arbitrary target surfaces can be approximated by optimized binary snag patterns.

Significance. The fabrication strategy is simple, visually convincing, and potentially useful for wearable devices, soft robotics, and morphing textiles. The use of physical prototypes paired with scanned geometries and a reduced-order bar & hinge model is a strength, as is the explicit statement of both calibration constants. The scaling analysis offers falsifiable predictions, and the inverse-design examples, if validated, would be a valuable proof of concept. However, the manuscript currently overstates the generality of the inverse-design capability, and the model-experiment agreement is partly by construction because one calibration constant is fitted to the experimental rest shapes it is later used to predict. These issues are addressable but require additional validation or a re-scoping of the claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (1), Figs. 1-2 and 4] The forward model is not independently validated. The text states that CB = 10 is 'chosen such that our system matches the experimental rest shapes.' Since the same experimental rest shapes are then compared against the model in Figs. 1, 2, and 4, the agreement is partly by construction. CA = 0.36 comes from prior stiffness calibration, but CB is not. Please add a holdout or leave-one-out validation, report quantitative error statistics (e.g., mean/max/RMSE of δ/L), and clarify which results are true predictions versus calibrated fits.
  2. [Section 5, Eq. (4), Fig. 5(b), and Abstract] The claim that inverse design can approximate 'arbitrary target surfaces' is not supported. Only two smooth, convex/near-developable targets (leg and elbow) are demonstrated, and the binary snag basis — each snag being a local protrusion — has no demonstrated capability to express negative Gaussian curvature. The saddle example in Fig. 2(b) starts from an already-woven saddle surface and only distorts it; it does not show generation of negative curvature from a planar weave. Moreover, the fitness function in Eq. (4) only minimizes a one-sided deviation, so a genetic algorithm will always return some optimum even if the pattern class cannot represent the target. Please either re-scope the claim to convex/near-developable targets or add an expressiveness analysis and a negative- or mixed-curvature target to demonstrate the general capability.
  3. [Section 4, Fig. 4(a)-(f)] The scaling laws are central claims but are presented without error bars, regression lines, or goodness-of-fit statistics. The experimental and numerical data points cannot be quantitatively compared, and the stated exponents (e.g., (M/N)^(-1/3), t^(1/3)) are not statistically supported. Please quantify the fits and uncertainties, and clearly separate model predictions from experimental measurements.
minor comments (6)
  1. [References] Reference 41 appears to contain placeholder identifiers: DOI '10.1103/9srl-9gsc' and arXiv:2401.12345. Please update to the final published details.
  2. [Figs. 1, 2, and 5 captions] The error colormaps are described as normalized δ/L, but no numerical scale or summary error values are given. Reporting mean/max/RMSE would make 'excellent match' quantitative.
  3. [Eq. (4)] The symbol d_q is described as a 'Hausdorff distance', but it is actually a one-sided distance from each simulated node to the target surface. Please clarify the notation and whether the comparison is symmetric.
  4. [Section 5] The smoothing step (Fig. S1) removes snag features before computing the deviation. This is reasonable when comparing to a smooth body surface, but the manuscript should also report unsmoothed errors so readers can see the local protrusion magnitudes.
  5. [Section 5] The genetic algorithm parameters (population 200, generations 100, λ=0.3) are given without sensitivity analysis. A brief robustness discussion would strengthen the inverse-design claims.
  6. [General] The manuscript contains no explicit limitations paragraph. Given the expressiveness concern in the major comments, a short statement of scope would be appropriate.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Model validation is partly in-sample: CB is fitted to the experimental rest shapes that are then used to demonstrate the model's 'excellent match'; scaling and inverse-design retain independent content.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3, after Eq. (2)]
    "In our simulation, we useCB = 10 which is chosen such that our system matches the experimental rest shapes, and we use E = 3.1 GPa and ν = 0.38 obtained through a tensile test of the Mylar ® sheets."

    CB multiplies the bending stiffness in Eq. (1), and the rest shape is the minimizer of the total energy Eq. (3); therefore CB directly controls the predicted curvature. Saying CB is 'chosen such that our system matches the experimental rest shapes' means the experimental rest-shape data are used to set the model parameter. The subsequent statements — 'An excellent match is observed between the scanned geometry of the physical prototypes and our mechanics simulation' (Section 2.1, Fig. 1) and 'The scanned geometry of the physical prototypes match well with our mechanics simulation' (Section 2.2, Fig. 2) — compare the model to those same calibration data. This agreement is an in-sample fit, not an independent test. The model's predictive content for rest shapes must be established on snag pa

full rationale

The paper has one genuine circular-validation step: CB is calibrated to the experimental rest shapes, and the same rest shapes are presented as the 'excellent match' validating the bar & hinge model. This is a fitted input doing double duty as a prediction, and it weakens the model validation in Figs. 1 and 2. It does not, however, make the central inverse-design claim circular: the leg and elbow targets are not used to fit CB, and the physical prototypes of the optimized snag patterns agreeing with the targets is an out-of-sample test. The scaling laws (Section 4) are also compared with experiment rather than merely read off the fitted model, and the Young's-modulus independence is an analytical consequence of Eqs. (1)-(3). CA=0.36 is imported from prior work by the same authors, but it was fit to linear stiffnesses, not to the rest shapes predicted here, so it is a self-citation with independent calibration data rather than a circular step. The claim that the binary snag basis can approximate 'arbitrary target surfaces' is not demonstrated for negative-Gaussian-curvature or mixed-curvature targets; that is a scope/correctness gap, not a circularity, and is not counted in the score. Overall: partial circularity in one load-bearing validation, but the core inverse-design and scaling results retain independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a reduced-order model with two fitted stiffness constants, several effective-thickness idealizations, and the assumption that geometric frustration propagates globally through a plain weave. The paper introduces no new physical entities; snags are geometric defects, not a new force or particle.

free parameters (3)
  • CB = 10
    Dimensionless bending stiffness calibration constant; chosen in Section 3 so the model matches experimental rest shapes. This is a direct fit to the output the model is later used to predict.
  • CA = 0.36
    Dimensionless stretching stiffness calibration constant; taken from ref 43 (prior work) to match experimental linear stiffnesses. Still a fitted constant, not derived from first principles.
  • lambda = 0.3
    Weight in the inverse-design fitness function trading surface deviation against snag sparsity; chosen by the authors for convenience, not determined by physics.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The bar & hinge model with calibrated constants CB and CA accurately represents the bending, twisting, stretching, and shearing mechanics of densely woven plain fabrics.
    The entire forward simulation (Section 3) rests on this reduced-order model, which is not derived from first principles and depends on calibration constants.
  • domain assumption The effective thickness for bending of type II hinges is 3*sqrt(2)*t, a linear superposition of individual ribbon bending moduli.
    Invoked in Section 3 after Eq. 1; the superposition of non-rigidly bonded woven ribbons may not hold for all snag geometries.
  • domain assumption The self-morphing technique, which incrementally changes stress-free hinge angles to pi, converges to the true rest shape of the snagged weave.
    Section 3 assumes the rest shape is the zero-force state reached from a flat reference; standard but assumes no local minima or irreversibility.
  • standard math Linear elastic material behavior of Mylar ribbons; Young's modulus E and Poisson's ratio nu are constant.
    Paper uses E=3.1 GPa and nu=0.38 from tensile tests; linear elasticity gives the E-independence of shape.
  • domain assumption The geometric frustration from a snag propagates smoothly through the entire weave, producing a global curvature field.
    The central mechanism claimed in Section 2; if frustration localizes (e.g., only near the snag), the inverse design would fail for large surfaces.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Engineering snags for spatial curvature in weaves: Fabrication, mechanics, and inverse design." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EKWA3W3H

@misc{pith2026250806673,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Engineering snags for spatial curvature in weaves: Fabrication, mechanics, and inverse design},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EKWA3W3H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06673}
}
read the original abstract

Weaving as an old craft has extensive applications in modern science and technology such as smart textiles and intelligent soft robots. However, weaving irregular curved surfaces has been difficult, with prior alternatives requiring curved ribbons and triaxial weaving patterns. In this work, we present a simple strategy to achieve complex spatial curvature by purposely introducing 'snags', a traditionally unwanted textile defect, into dense plain weaves consisting of straight ribbons assembled in a straightforward biaxial network. We detail the fabrication methodology where we pull out ribbons of initially smooth two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) plain weaves to form local snags. We show that these local defects cause global curvatures through the propagation of geometric frustration. We then use a reduced-order bar & hinge model to simulate the mechanics-guided deformation of snagged plain weaves, and we investigate how the curvature scales with system parameters such as the thickness and Young's modulus of the ribbons. Finally, we introduce an inverse design platform where an evolutionary algorithm is used to inversely compute the optimal snag patterns of smooth plain weaves to approximate arbitrary target surfaces including 2D and 3D woven exoskeletons that fit human legs and elbows, respectively. Engineering snags in plain weaves as a general strategy can pave the way for future design of customizable wearable devices, adaptive soft robots, reconfigurable architecture, and more.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author Maziz, A. et al. journal title Knitting and weaving artificial muscles . Science Advances volume 3 , pages e1600327 ( year 2017 )

  2. [2]

    author Haines, C. S. et al. journal title New twist on artificial muscles . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences volume 113 , pages 11709--11716 ( year 2016 )

  3. [3]

    author Shin, D. et al. journal title Woven fabric muscle for soft wearable robotic application using two-dimensional zigzag shape memory alloy actuator . Soft Robotics volume 11 , pages 1008--1019 ( year 2024 )

  4. [4]

    , author Kurkin, A

    author Miao, Y. , author Kurkin, A. , author Wang, P. , author Ye, L. & author Zhang, X. journal title Flexible carbon fiber composite with enhanced durable impact-resistance and sensing capability based on polyborosiloxane network . Advanced Functional Materials pages 2503952 ( year 2025 )

  5. [5]

    author Wang, S. et al. journal title Smart wearable K evlar-based safeguarding electronic textile with excellent sensing performance . Soft Matter volume 13 , pages 2483--2491 ( year 2017 )

  6. [6]

    , author Wu, L

    author Qiu, Y. , author Wu, L. , author Liu, S. & author Yu, W. journal title Impact-protective bicontinuous hydrogel/ultrahigh-molecular weight polyethylene fabric composite with multiscale energy dissipation structures for soft body armor . ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces volume 15 , pages 10053--10063 ( year 2023 )

  7. [7]

    author Surjadi, J. U. , author Aymon, B. F. , author Carton, M. & author Portela, C. M. journal title Double-network-inspired mechanical metamaterials . Nature Materials pages 1--10 ( year 2025 )

  8. [8]

    author Wang, Y. et al. journal title Molecularly resonant metamaterials for broad-band electromagnetic stealth . Advanced Science volume 10 , pages 2301170 ( year 2023 )

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    author Lan, L. et al. journal title Woven organic crystals . Nature Communications volume 14 , pages 7582 ( year 2023 )

  2. [10]

    , author Andreassen, B

    author Zhang, Z.-H. , author Andreassen, B. J. , author August, D. P. , author Leigh, D. A. & author Zhang, L. journal title Molecular weaving . Nature Materials volume 21 , pages 275--283 ( year 2022 )

  3. [11]

    author Yang, G. H. et al. journal title Single layer silk and cotton woven fabrics for acoustic emission and active sound suppression . Advanced Materials volume 36 , pages 2313328 ( year 2024 )

  4. [12]

    author Chen, S. et al. journal title Implications of weaving pattern on the material properties of two-dimensional molecularly woven fabrics . Matter volume 8 ( year 2025 )

  5. [13]

    author Zhang, L. et al. journal title Hierarchical weaving metafabric for unidirectional water transportation and evaporative cooling . Advanced Functional Materials volume 33 , pages 2307590 ( year 2023 )

  6. [14]

    author Yan, W. et al. journal title Single fibre enables acoustic fabrics via nanometre-scale vibrations . Nature volume 603 , pages 616--623 ( year 2022 )

  7. [15]

    , author Sun, C

    author Wang, Y. , author Sun, C. & author Ahmed, D. journal title A smart acoustic textile for health monitoring . Nature Electronics pages 1--11 ( year 2025 )

  8. [16]

    author Lin, S. et al. journal title Triboelectric micro-flexure-sensitive fiber electronics . Nature Communications volume 15 , pages 2374 ( year 2024 )

  9. [17]

    , author Chen, J

    author Xiong, J. , author Chen, J. & author Lee, P. S. journal title Functional fibers and fabrics for soft robotics, wearables, and human--robot interface . Advanced Materials volume 33 , pages 2002640 ( year 2021 )

  10. [18]

    author Lu, H. et al. journal title Intelligent perceptual textiles based on ionic-conductive and strong silk fibers . Nature Communications volume 15 , pages 3289 ( year 2024 )

  11. [19]

    author He, J. et al. journal title Scalable production of high-performing woven lithium-ion fibre batteries . Nature volume 597 , pages 57--63 ( year 2021 )

  12. [20]

    author Shi, X. et al. journal title Large-area display textiles integrated with functional systems . Nature volume 591 , pages 240--245 ( year 2021 )

  13. [21]

    author Zeng, S. et al. journal title Hierarchical-morphology metafabric for scalable passive daytime radiative cooling . Science volume 373 , pages 692--696 ( year 2021 )

  14. [22]

    author Schamberger, B. et al. journal title Curvature in biological systems: its quantification, emergence, and implications across the scales . Advanced Materials volume 35 , pages 2206110 ( year 2023 )

  15. [23]

    author Buckner, T. L. , author Bilodeau, R. A. , author Kim, S. Y. & author Kramer-Bottiglio, R. journal title Roboticizing fabric by integrating functional fibers . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences volume 117 , pages 25360--25369 ( year 2020 )

  16. [24]

    author Yang, Y. et al. journal title Gaussian curvature--driven direction of cell fate toward osteogenesis with triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences volume 119 , pages e2206684119 ( year 2022 )

  17. [25]

    , author Martin, A

    author Baek, C. , author Martin, A. G. , author Poincloux, S. , author Chen, T. & author Reis, P. M. journal title Smooth triaxial weaving with naturally curved ribbons . Physical Review Letters volume 127 , pages 104301 ( year 2021 )

  18. [26]

    author Ren, Y. et al. journal title 3d weaving with curved ribbons . ACM Transactions on Graphics volume 40 , pages 127 ( year 2021 )

  19. [27]

    , author Vallat, C

    author Poincloux, S. , author Vallat, C. , author Chen, T. , author Sano, T. G. & author Reis, P. M. journal title Indentation and stability of woven domes . Extreme Mechanics Letters volume 59 , pages 101968 ( year 2023 )

  20. [28]

    author Lewandowska, U. et al. journal title A triaxial supramolecular weave . Nature Chemistry volume 9 , pages 1068--1072 ( year 2017 )

  21. [29]

    author Barman, N. K. , author Bhattacharya, S. S. & author Alagirusamy, R. journal title Textile structures in concrete reinforcement . Textile Progress volume 56 , pages 1--229 ( year 2024 )

  22. [30]

    journal title Multiaxis three-dimensional weaving for composites: a review

    author Bilisik, K. journal title Multiaxis three-dimensional weaving for composites: a review . Textile Research Journal volume 82 , pages 725--743 ( year 2012 )

  23. [31]

    & author Eltahan, E

    author El Messiry, M. & author Eltahan, E. journal title Stab resistance of triaxial woven fabrics for soft body armor . Journal of Industrial Textiles volume 45 , pages 1062--1082 ( year 2016 )

  24. [32]

    author Shi, X. et al. journal title Effect of fiber fraction on ballistic impact behavior of 3 D woven composites . Polymers volume 15 , pages 1170 ( year 2023 )

  25. [33]

    author Khi \^e m, V. N. , author Jabareen, M. , author Poudel, R. , author Tang, X. & author Itskov, M. journal title Modeling of textile composite using analytical network-averaging and gradient damage approach . Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids volume 193 , pag...

  26. [34]

    author Khi \^e m, V. N. , author Krieger, H. , author Itskov, M. , author Gries, T. & author Stapleton, S. E. journal title An averaging based hyperelastic modeling and experimental analysis of non-crimp fabrics . International Journal of Solids and Structures volume 154 , pag...

  27. [35]

    , author He, Y

    author Mei, M. , author He, Y. , author Yang, X. & author Wei, K. journal title Analysis and experiment of deformation and draping characteristics in hemisphere preforming for plain woven fabrics . International Journal of Solids and Structures volume 222 , pages 111039 ( year 2021 )

  28. [36]

    , author Xu, B

    author Chen, B. , author Xu, B. , author Zhang, Y. & author Liu, X. journal title Experimental and numerical study on draping behavior of recycled textile composite reinforcement with different weave patterns . Composite Structures volume 363 , pages 119123 ( year 2025 )

  29. [37]

    author Weerasinghe, D. et al. journal title Impact resistance and yarn pull-out behaviour of polymer spray-coated uhmwpe fabrics . Materials Today Communications volume 33 , pages 104473 ( year 2022 )

  30. [38]

    , author Chen, S

    author Yu, F. , author Chen, S. , author Harper, L. & author Warrior, N. journal title Simulating the effect of fabric bending stiffness on the wrinkling behaviour of biaxial fabrics during preforming . Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing volume 143 , pages 10...

  31. [39]

    , author Merrill, R

    author Nilakantan, G. , author Merrill, R. L. , author Keefe, M. , author Gillespie Jr, J. W. & author Wetzel, E. D. journal title Experimental investigation of the role of frictional yarn pull-out and windowing on the probabilistic impact response of K evlar fabrics . Composi...

  32. [40]

    author Tian, X. et al. journal title Implant-to-implant wireless networking with metamaterial textiles . Nature Communications volume 14 , pages 4335 ( year 2023 )

  33. [41]

    author Tu, G. W. & author Filipov, E. T. journal title Corner topology makes woven baskets into stiff, yet resilient metamaterials . Physical Review Research 10.1103/9srl-9gsc ( year 2025 ). note Accepted, in press , arXiv:2401.12345

  34. [42]

    , author Liu, K

    author Filipov, E. , author Liu, K. , author Tachi, T. , author Schenk, M. & author Paulino, G. H. journal title Bar and hinge models for scalable analysis of origami . International Journal of Solids and Structures volume 124 , pages 26--45 ( year 2017 )

  35. [43]

    author Tu, G. W. & author Filipov, E. T. journal title Origami of multi-layered spaced sheets . Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids volume 190 , pages 105730 ( year 2024 )

  36. [44]

    title Mechanics of Materials, 10th edition ( publisher Pearson , year 2016 )

    author Hibbeler, R. title Mechanics of Materials, 10th edition ( publisher Pearson , year 2016 )

  37. [45]

    , author Zhu, Z

    author Peng, S. , author Zhu, Z. & author Wei, Y. journal title An analytic solution for bending of multilayered structures with interlayer-slip . International Journal of Mechanical Sciences volume 282 , pages 109642 ( year 2024 )

  38. [46]

    & author Filipov, E

    author Wo, Z. & author Filipov, E. T. journal title Stiffening multi-stable origami tubes by outward popping of creases . Extreme Mechanics Letters volume 58 , pages 101941 ( year 2023 )

  39. [47]

    author Goldberg, D. E. & author Deb, K. title A comparative analysis of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms . In booktitle Foundations of Genetic Algorithms , vol. volume 1 , pages 69--93 ( publisher Elsevier , year 1991 )

  40. [48]

    author Huttenlocher, D. P. , author Klanderman, G. A. & author Rucklidge, W. J. journal title Comparing images using the hausdorff distance . IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence volume 15 , pages 850--863 ( year 1993 )

  41. [49]

    author Molinaro, D. D. et al. journal title Task-agnostic exoskeleton control via biological joint moment estimation . Nature volume 635 , pages 337--344 ( year 2024 )

  42. [50]

    & author Weaver, J

    author Bechthold, M. & author Weaver, J. C. journal title Materials science and architecture . Nature Reviews Materials volume 2 , pages 1--19 ( year 2017 )

  43. [51]

    , author Yin, M

    author Zhang, Y. , author Yin, M. & author Xu, B. journal title Elastocapillary rolling transfer weaves soft materials to spatial structures . Science Advances volume 9 , pages eadh9232 ( year 2023 )

  44. [52]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url doi volume year label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block ...

  45. [53]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.