Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

DatasetResearch: Benchmarking Agent Systems for Demand-Driven Dataset Discovery

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.06960 v1 pith:D5G66QTF submitted 2025-08-09 cs.AI cs.CL

DatasetResearch: Benchmarking Agent Systems for Demand-Driven Dataset Discovery

classification cs.AI cs.CL
keywords agentsdatasetsystemsdatasetresearchdiscoveryresearchacrossanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancement of large language models has fundamentally shifted the bottleneck in AI development from computational power to data availability-with countless valuable datasets remaining hidden across specialized repositories, research appendices, and domain platforms. As reasoning capabilities and deep research methodologies continue to evolve, a critical question emerges: can AI agents transcend conventional search to systematically discover any dataset that meets specific user requirements, enabling truly autonomous demand-driven data curation? We introduce DatasetResearch, the first comprehensive benchmark evaluating AI agents' ability to discover and synthesize datasets from 208 real-world demands across knowledge-intensive and reasoning-intensive tasks. Our tri-dimensional evaluation framework reveals a stark reality: even advanced deep research systems achieve only 22% score on our challenging DatasetResearch-pro subset, exposing the vast gap between current capabilities and perfect dataset discovery. Our analysis uncovers a fundamental dichotomy-search agents excel at knowledge tasks through retrieval breadth, while synthesis agents dominate reasoning challenges via structured generation-yet both catastrophically fail on "corner cases" outside existing distributions. These findings establish the first rigorous baseline for dataset discovery agents and illuminate the path toward AI systems capable of finding any dataset in the digital universe. Our benchmark and comprehensive analysis provide the foundation for the next generation of self-improving AI systems and are publicly available at https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/DatasetResearch.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LU-500: A Logo Benchmark for Concept Unlearning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new 500-company benchmark shows current concept-erasure methods cannot remove small logos from generated images without also changing unrelated content.

  2. DataMaster: Data-Centric Autonomous AI Research

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DataMaster autonomously optimizes data via tree search and shared memory, raising medal rate 32.27% on MLE-Bench Lite and beating the base instruct model on GPQA.

  3. DataMaster: Data-Centric Autonomous AI Research

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DataMaster deploys an AI agent to autonomously engineer data via tree search over external sources, shared candidate pools, and memory of past outcomes, yielding 32% higher medal rates on MLE-Bench Lite and a small GP...

  4. AgentEconomist: An End-to-end Agentic System Translating Economic Intuitions into Executable Computational Experiments

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AgentEconomist is an end-to-end agentic system with idea development, experimental design, and execution stages that uses a large economics paper database to produce research ideas with better literature grounding, no...

  5. Aligned Agents, Biased Swarm: Measuring Bias Amplification in Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.MA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Multi-agent systems amplify minor stochastic biases into systemic polarization via echo-chamber effects in structured workflows, even with neutral agents.

  6. The Cost of Knowing: A Resource-Aware Protocol for Benchmarking Hallucination Beyond Static Leaderboards

    cs.AI 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0

    MAS-HQ defines a resource-aware Q-Score and shows that the system with the highest raw factuality is often not the winner once normalized cost is subtracted.