Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Strong magnetic fields reverse the temperature ordering of QCD's leading-order equation of state near the crossover, and can make the trace-anomaly coefficient negative.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Continuum-estimated leading-order EoS coefficients in magnetized strangeness-neutral QCD at nonzero baryon chemical potential show temperature-band crossings in q1 and P2 and a possible sign change of the trace anomaly coefficient.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid extension of the magnetized QCD EoS program; the Theta2 sign change is real in the current data but numerically fragile and needs careful scrutiny before being used phenomenologically. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2508.07532 v1 pith:SWYIWJZQ submitted 2025-08-11 hep-lat hep-phnucl-th

Leading-Order QCD Equation of State in Strong Magnetic Fields at Nonzero Baryon Chemical Potential

Heng-Tong Ding , Jin-Biao Gu , Arpith Kumar , Sheng-Tai Li This is my paper
classification hep-lat hep-phnucl-th PACS 12.38.Gc12.38.Mh
keywords lattice QCDequation of statemagnetic fieldbaryon chemical potentialTaylor expansionconserved-charge fluctuationsstrangeness neutralityLandau levels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that strong background magnetic fields qualitatively restructure the leading-order QCD equation of state at finite baryon chemical potential, in the temperature band just above the crossover. Using (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD with physical pion masses and continuum extrapolations from $N_\tau=8,12$, it computes the leading-order Taylor coefficients $q_1$, $s_1$, $P_2$, $N_1^{\mathrm{B}}$, $\Theta_2$, $\epsilon_2$, $\sigma_2$ for strangeness-neutral matter with charge-to-baryon ratio $r=0.4$. The central observations are temperature-band crossings in $q_1$ and $P_2$ at $eB\gtrsim0.6$ GeV$^2$, non-monotonic energy-like coefficients, and a possible sign change of the trace-anomaly coefficient $\Theta_2$ at strong fields and higher temperature, which would mean the pressure response dominates over the energy response. These coefficients are direct inputs for hydrodynamic modeling of heavy-ion collisions and for equations of state used in magnetar studies, and the paper provides analytic parametrizations for phenomenological use.

Core claim

The paper claims that, once strangeness neutrality and the isospin ratio $r=n_Q/n_B$ are imposed, the leading-order response of QCD matter to baryon chemical potential in a magnetic field is not a simple rescaling of the zero-field equation of state. From continuum-estimated second-order charge fluctuations it derives $q_1=(\mu_Q/\mu_B)_{\mathrm{LO}}$ and $s_1=(\mu_S/\mu_B)_{\mathrm{LO}}$, then the pressure coefficient $P_2$ and baryon-density coefficient $N_1^{\mathrm{B}}$. It finds that $-q_1$ grows with $eB$ by factors of about 3 at $eB\simeq0.15$ GeV$^2$ and up to about 11 at $eB\simeq0.8$ GeV$^2$, with the fixed-temperature bands crossing so that the low-temperature curve sits above the

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Taylor expansion of the pressure in powers of $\hat\mu_B$ at fixed $eB$, with the chemical potential ratios $q_1\hat\mu_B$ and $s_1\hat\mu_B$ fixed by $\hat n_S=0$ and $\hat n_Q/\hat n_B=r$ using the second-order conserved-charge susceptibility matrix (Eqs. (31)-(32)). The leading-order coefficients are then $P_2=\frac12\hat\mu_B\hat n_{\mathrm{LO}}^{\mathrm{B}}(1+rq_1)$, $N_1^{\mathrm{B}}=\chi_2^B+q_1\chi_{11}^{BQ}+s_1\chi_{11}^{BS}$, and the energy-like coefficients $\Theta_2=-rT(\partial q_1/\partial T)N_1^{\mathrm{B}}+T(\partial P_2/\partial T)$, $\epsilon_2=\Theta_2+3P_2$, $\sigma_2=\epsilon_2+P_2-(1+rq_1)N_1^{\mathrm{B}}$. The physical driver invoked for the strong

Load-bearing premise

The sign change of the trace-anomaly coefficient rests on Eq. (64), which is stated without derivation and whose constraint-dependent term appears to have the wrong sign if the standard identity $\hat\Theta=T(\partial \hat p/\partial T)$ at fixed $\hat\mu_B$ is applied; if that term is wrong, the claimed $\Theta_2<0$ at strong fields and high $T$ does not follow.

What would settle it

A direct lattice check: compute $\Theta_2$ as $T\,\partial P_2/\partial T$ from the same ensembles (without the $q_1$ derivative term) and compare with the reported $\Theta_2$ at $eB\simeq0.8$ GeV$^2$, $T\simeq155$-$158$ MeV; if the simple derivative already reproduces the data, Eq. (64)'s extra term is not needed, and if it gives the opposite sign, the negative-trace-anomaly claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Heavy-ion phenomenological equations of state that use only the $\mu_B=0$ EoS plus a simple $eB$ rescaling will miss the hierarchy reversal: at $eB\gtrsim0.6$ GeV$^2$, the low-temperature pressure coefficient can exceed the high-temperature one, and $P_2$ develops a peak.
  • Strangeness-neutrality constraints suppress the magnetic enhancement of $P_2$ relative to the unconstrained $\hat\mu_Q=\hat\mu_S=0$ case; at $r=0$ the enhancement is the most muted even though $|q_1|$ is largest, so neutron-star-like modeling should not use the $\mu_Q=\mu_S=0$ pressure.
  • The ratio $N_1^{\mathrm{B}}/(2P_2)$ moves from about 1.02 toward 1.10 at strong fields, approaching the magnetized ideal-gas limit; the paper's analytic parametrization in Appendix B gives a direct way to implement this in models.
  • At strong fields, the trace-anomaly coefficient can be negative, meaning the pressure contribution dominates over the energy contribution ($3P_2>\epsilon_2$); if sustained, this changes expectations for hydrodynamic expansion and thermalization in magnetized matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the sign in Eq. (64) is not correct, the negative-$\Theta_2$ conclusion is the first thing to fall; a direct lattice computation of $T\,\partial\hat p/\partial T$ at fixed $\hat\mu_B$ on the same ensembles would separate the two forms.
  • Beyond the paper: the temperature at which $P_2(T)$ peaks at large $eB$ could serve as a magnetic-field-dependent transition marker, but the 145-165 MeV window and present uncertainties leave that as a proposal, not a result of this paper.
  • Beyond the paper: the muted $P_2$ at $r=0$, if extended to cold $\beta$-equilibrated matter, would imply smaller magnetic corrections to neutron-star mass-radius relations than naive Landau-level estimates; the paper itself explicitly stops short of that cold extrapolation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a lattice QCD calculation of the leading-order Taylor coefficients of the QCD equation of state in a background magnetic field at nonzero baryon chemical potential. Using (2+1)-flavor HISQ configurations at physical quark masses with Nτ = 8 and 12, temperatures between 145 and 165 MeV, and eB up to 0.8 GeV², the authors combine previously published conserved-charge fluctuation results [106] with strangeness-neutrality and charge-to-baryon constraints to construct q1, s1, P2, N1^B, and the energy-like coefficients Θ2, ε2, and σ2. They report temperature-band crossings in q1 and P2, non-monotonic structures in the energy-like coefficients, and a possible sign change of Θ2 at strong fields and high temperature. The r-dependence and comparisons with HRG and ideal-gas models are also presented.

Significance. If the results are robust, this is the first continuum-estimated determination of these leading-order magnetized EoS coefficients at finite baryon density, and it provides useful benchmark data for heavy-ion and neutron-star applications. A clear strength is that the input susceptibilities come from independent lattice measurements rather than being fitted to the target coefficients, so the construction is not circular. The paper also provides compact parameterizations in Appendices B and C, which are practical for model comparisons. The central new physics claim — a field-induced restructuring of the temperature hierarchy and a possible negative trace-anomaly coefficient at strong fields — is interesting and falsifiable. However, the numerical support for the sign change of Θ2 needs strengthening before the claim can be regarded as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section VI D, Eq. (64)] Eq. (64) is stated without derivation, although every energy-like coefficient and the central sign-change claim rest on it. The formula is in fact correct: starting from Θ̂ = T ∂p̂/∂T at fixed μ̂s and using nQ = r nB and nS = 0, the total T-derivative of the constrained pressure expansion acquires the extra term −r T q1' N1^B μ̂B². But the manuscript should show this derivation explicitly rather than assert Eq. (64). Please add the derivation or provide a clear reference where it is carried out.
  2. [Section VI D, Figs. 8 and 9] The negative Θ2 at eB ≈ 0.79 GeV² and T ≳ 155 MeV is a delicate balance between T ∂P2/∂T and −r T q1' N1^B. These derivatives are obtained from 2D B-spline interpolation through only about five T values per lattice spacing and from a two-point linear 1/Nτ² extrapolation. The sign change sits near the upper end of the T window, where spline derivatives are least constrained. Please provide a systematic robustness check: vary spline order and knot placement, compare derivatives taken before versus after the continuum extrapolation, and, if possible, include Nτ = 16 data for P2 and q1 themselves. Without such a test, the sign change should be presented only as an unresolved possibility, not as a result.
  3. [Appendix A] The continuum extrapolation is linear in 1/Nτ² using only Nτ = 8 and 12. The text refers to Refs. [17,106] for an Nτ = 16 consistency check, but those references concern the second-order fluctuations and related quantities; the paper under review uses the derived coefficients P2, q1, and their T-derivatives appearing in Eq. (64). Please clarify the extent to which the Nτ = 16 validation covers these derived quantities, or state explicitly that the energy-like coefficients have only been computed at two lattice spacings. This matters because the claimed Θ2 behavior is a continuum-level claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 9 caption] The σ2 panel is described as the "bottom panel" but is actually the right panel of the figure; please correct the caption.
  2. [Appendix B, Eq. (B1)] The dimensionless variable denoted by a bar over T is not clearly defined in the equation; the text states T = 1 − Tpc/T, but the notation should be distinguished from the physical temperature T to avoid confusion.
  3. [Introduction and throughout] There are several typographical issues, e.g., "functional renormalizaiton group" in the Introduction and some broken math-mode spacing ("N f = 2 + 1 + 1"). A careful proofread is recommended.
  4. [Section VI D] The fixed temperatures T = 148, 155, 158 MeV used for the energy-like coefficients differ from the T = 145, 155, 165 MeV used elsewhere (Figs. 1, 4, 7). Please explain the choice or make the temperature sets consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: all target coefficients are derived from independently measured susceptibilities; self-citations are data citations, not load-bearing conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (i) measure second-order conserved-charge susceptibilities on N_tau=8 and 12 lattices (input from companion paper [106]); (ii) solve the strangeness-neutrality and isospin constraints, Eqs. (29)-(30), for q1 and s1 via Eqs. (31)-(32); (iii) construct P2 and N1^B via Eqs. (60) and (62); (iv) construct Theta2, epsilon2 and sigma2 via Eqs. (64)-(66) from temperature derivatives of P2 and q1. None of the target quantities - the temperature-band crossings in q1 and P2, the non-monotonic structures, or the possible sign change of Theta2 - is used as a fit constraint or as an input to the susceptibility computation. The self-citations to [106] are citations to measured lattice data, not to conclusions of the present paper, and the N_tau=16 validation of the continuum extrapolation cited in [17,106] is independent supporting evidence. HRG and magnetized ideal-gas comparisons serve as external benchmarks. Equation (64) combines already-determined quantities; even if its sign or derivation were debatable, that is a correctness concern, not circularity. No step reduces by construction to its own output.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on second-order conserved-charge susceptibilities from the authors' companion paper [106], a linear 1/Nτ² continuum extrapolation using only Nτ=8 and 12, and leading-order truncation of the µ_B Taylor expansion. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Rational polynomial fit coefficients for P2, -q1, s1 (T-parametrization) = Table II, entries ak, bk for eB in {0.0,0.1,0.2,0.4,0.6,0.79 GeV^2}
    Fitted to continuum-estimated lattice data; used to compute T derivatives entering Θ2, ε2, σ2.
  • Rational polynomial fit coefficients for P2, -q1, s1 (eB-parametrization) = Table III, entries ak, bk for T in {145,155,165 MeV}
    Fitted representation of eB dependence at fixed temperatures.
  • 2D B-spline interpolation in T-eB plane = Appendix A; spline bands from bootstrap
    Smoothing choice that sets crossing locations and derivative estimates for the continuum extrapolation.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Linear continuum extrapolation in 1/Nτ² using Nτ=8 and 12 is valid for the derived coefficients
    Appendix A; validation with Nτ=16 is cited from Ref. [106] for susceptibilities, not for P2, Θ2, ε2, σ2.
  • domain assumption Leading-order Taylor expansion in µ_B is sufficient in the T and eB window studied
    Sec. II; higher order terms are neglected throughout.
  • domain assumption Strangeness neutrality and r=n_Q/n_B are imposed at leading order through linear q1 and s1
    Sec. II B, Eqs. 29-32; higher-order q3, s3 are dropped.
  • standard math Standard trace anomaly identity Θ̂ = T(∂p̂/∂T) at fixed µ̂_B
    Eq. 9; Eq. 64 appears to deviate from this identity.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Leading-Order QCD Equation of State in Strong Magnetic Fields at Nonzero Baryon Chemical Potential." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SWYIWJZQ

@misc{pith2026250807532,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Leading-Order QCD Equation of State in Strong Magnetic Fields at Nonzero Baryon Chemical Potential},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SWYIWJZQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.07532}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We present continuum-estimated $(2+1)$-flavor lattice QCD results for the leading-order Taylor expansion coefficients of the equation of state in strong magnetic fields and at nonzero baryon chemical potential. Simulations employ the highly improved staggered quark (HISQ) action with physical pion masses on lattices of temporal extent $N_\tau = 8,\,12$, covering $145 \lesssim T \lesssim 165~\mathrm{MeV}$ and $eB \lesssim 0.8~\mathrm{GeV}^2$, imposing strangeness neutrality with baseline results at electric charge to baryon number ratio $r = 0.4$. We determine the $T$--$eB$ dependence of $q_1$ and $s_1$ (electric charge and strangeness chemical potential ratios), pressure coefficient $P_2$, baryon number density coefficient $N_1^{\rm B}$, and energy-like coefficients $\Theta_2$ (trace anomaly), $\epsilon_2$ (energy density), and $\sigma_2$ (entropy density). Magnetic fields induce temperature-band crossings for $q_1$ and $P_2$ and non-monotonic structures in the energy-like coefficients, with $\Theta_2$ at strong fields possibly vanishing or turning negative at higher $T$, indicating dominance of the pressure term over the energy contribution. We also examine the $r$-dependence, finding that $r=0$ (charge-neutral matter) shows the most muted magnetic-field enhancement of $P_2$ despite larger $|q_1|$, providing a useful reference for neutron-star-like conditions. Comparisons with the hadron resonance gas (HRG) model show qualitative agreement at low $T$ and weak $eB$, with clear deviations near the crossover and at strong fields. These results provide useful input for constraining models and effective theories of QCD matter in strong magnetic fields at finite baryon density.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.07532 by Arpith Kumar, Heng-Tong Ding, Jin-Biao Gu, Sheng-Tai Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Electric charge over baryon chemical potential leading-order coefficient, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Same as Fig. 1 but for strangeness over baryon chemical potential leading-order coefficient, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Leading-order coefficient of the electric charge to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Pressure leading-order Taylor expansion coefficient, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Isolated view of the right panel of Fig. 4 at fixed mag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Leading-order Taylor expansion coefficient of pressure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Leading-order Taylor expansion coefficients of baryon number density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Leading-order Taylor expansion coefficients of trace [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Leading-order Taylor expansion coefficients of trace anomaly Θ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Leading-order Taylor expansion coefficients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Isospin-Driven Splitting of Chemical Potentials in Isobar Collisions from Lattice QCD

    hep-lat 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Lattice QCD yields first-principles splitting ratios for chemical potentials in Ru+Ru vs Zr+Zr collisions that are comparable in size to Bayesian STAR extractions, with Δμ_Q negative, Δμ_S positive, and only moderate ...

  2. Chiral first order phase transition at finite baryon density and zero temperature from self-consistent pole masses in the linear sigma model with quarks

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In the two-flavor linear sigma model with quarks, the chiral phase transition at T=0 is first order and occurs at a quark chemical potential equal to the vacuum quark mass.

  3. Formation of Quark-Gluon Plasma droplets under Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions in the presence of magnetic fields with a modified hadronic medium

    hep-ph 2026-08 reject novelty 4.0

    Calculations of a droplet free-energy model indicate a kaonic-plus-pionic medium stabilizes QGP droplets more than pions alone, with chemical potential and magnetic field acting in opposition.

  4. Lattice QCD at finite temperature and density

    hep-lat 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review of lattice QCD findings on the finite-temperature QCD transition at zero baryon chemical potential, its chiral limit behavior, constraints on the phase boundary and critical endpoint at finite density, plus a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Vachaspati,Magnetic fields from cosmological phase transitions,Phys

    T. Vachaspati,Magnetic fields from cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Lett. B265(1991) 258

    1991

  2. [2]

    Enqvist and P

    K. Enqvist and P. Olesen,On primordial magnetic fields of electroweak origin,Phys. Lett. B319(1993) 178 [hep-ph/9308270]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  3. [3]

    Ichiki, K

    K. Ichiki, K. Takahashi, H. Ohno, H. Hanayama and N. Sugiyama,Cosmological Magnetic Field: a fossil of density perturbations in the early universe,Science 311(2006) 827 [astro-ph/0603631]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Subramanian,The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields,Rept

    K. Subramanian,The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields,Rept. Prog. Phys.79 (2016) 076901 [1504.02311]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Duncan and C

    R.C. Duncan and C. Thompson,Formation of very strongly magnetized neutron stars - implications for gamma-ray bursts,Astrophys. J. Lett.392(1992) L9

    1992

  6. [6]

    Harding and D

    A.K. Harding and D. Lai,Physics of Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars,Rept. Prog. Phys.69(2006) 2631 [astro-ph/0606674]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Skokov, A.Y

    V. Skokov, A.Y. Illarionov and V. Toneev,Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24(2009) 5925 [0907.1396]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    Deng and X.-G

    W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang,Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Rev. C85(2012) 044907 [1201.5108]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Kharzeev, L.D

    D.E. Kharzeev, L.D. McLerran and H.J. Warringa, The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation ’,Nucl. Phys. A803(2008) 227 [0711.0950]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  10. [10]

    Fukushima, D.E

    K. Fukushima, D.E. Kharzeev and H.J. Warringa,The Chiral Magnetic Effect,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 074033 [0808.3382]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  11. [11]

    Kharzeev and J

    D.E. Kharzeev and J. Liao,Chiral magnetic effect reveals the topology of gauge fields in heavy-ion collisions,Nature Rev. Phys.3(2021) 55 [2102.06623]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Fukushima, D.E

    K. Fukushima, D.E. Kharzeev and H.J. Warringa, Electric-current Susceptibility and the Chiral Magnetic Effect,Nucl. Phys. A836(2010) 311 [0912.2961]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    Fu,Fluctuations and correlations of hot QCD matter in an external magnetic field,Phys

    W.-j. Fu,Fluctuations and correlations of hot QCD matter in an external magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 014009 [1306.5804]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Fukushima and Y

    K. Fukushima and Y. Hidaka,Magnetic Shift of the Chemical Freeze-out and Electric Charge Fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 102301 [1605.01912]. [15]STARcollaboration,Search for the chiral magnetic effect with isobar collisions at √sN N=200 GeV by the STAR Collaboration at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider,Phys. Rev. C105(2022) 014901 [2109.00131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [16]

    Kharzeev, J

    D.E. Kharzeev, J. Liao and S. Shi,Implications of the isobar-run results for the chiral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions,Phys. Rev. C106(2022) L051903 [2205.00120]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [17]

    Ding, J.-B

    H.-T. Ding, J.-B. Gu, A. Kumar, S.-T. Li and J.-H. Liu,Baryon Electric Charge Correlation as a Magnetometer of QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 201903 [2312.08860]. [18]ALICEcollaboration,Measurement of correlations among net-charge, net-proton, and net-kaon multiplicity distributions in Pb-Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02TeV,2503.18743

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [19]

    Endrodi,QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review,Prog

    G. Endrodi,QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 141(2025) 104153 [2406.19780]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [20]

    Adhikari et al.,Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,2412.18632

    P. Adhikari et al.,Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,2412.18632. 22

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [21]

    Mizher, M.N

    A.J. Mizher, M.N. Chernodub and E.S. Fraga,Phase diagram of hot QCD in an external magnetic field: possible splitting of deconfinement and chiral transitions,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 105016 [1004.2712]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [22]

    Ferrari, A.F

    G.N. Ferrari, A.F. Garcia and M.B. Pinto,Chiral Transition Within Effective Quark Models Under Magnetic Fields,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 096005 [1207.3714]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  21. [23]

    Ayala, M

    A. Ayala, M. Loewe and R. Zamora,Inverse magnetic catalysis in the linear sigma model with quarks,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 016002 [1406.7408]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [24]

    Tawfik and N

    A.N. Tawfik and N. Magdy,SU(3) Polyakov linear-σ model in an external magnetic field,Phys. Rev. C90 (2014) 015204 [1406.7488]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [25]

    Ayala, J.L

    A. Ayala, J.L. Hern´ andez, L.A. Hern´ andez, R.L.S. Farias and R. Zamora,Magnetic corrections to the boson self-coupling and boson-fermion coupling in the linear sigma model with quarks,Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 114038 [2009.13740]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  24. [26]

    Tawfik and A.M

    A.N. Tawfik and A.M. Diab,Chiral magnetic properties of QCD phase-diagram,Eur. Phys. J. A57 (2021) 200 [2106.04576]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  25. [27]

    Ayala, R.L.S

    A. Ayala, R.L.S. Farias, L.A. Hern´ andez, A.J. Mizher, J. Rend´ on, C. Villavicencio et al.,Magnetic field dependence of the neutral pion longitudinal screening mass in the linear sigma model with quarks,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 074019 [2311.13068]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [28]

    Fukushima, M

    K. Fukushima, M. Ruggieri and R. Gatto,Chiral magnetic effect in the PNJL model,Phys. Rev.D81 (2010) 114031 [1003.0047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [29]

    Skokov,Phase diagram in an external magnetic field beyond a mean-field approximation,Phys

    V. Skokov,Phase diagram in an external magnetic field beyond a mean-field approximation,Phys. Rev. D 85(2012) 034026 [1112.5137]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [30]

    Miransky and I.A

    V.A. Miransky and I.A. Shovkovy,Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rept.576(2015) 1 [1503.00732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [31]

    Ayala, C.A

    A. Ayala, C.A. Dominguez, L.A. Hernandez, M. Loewe, A. Raya, J.C. Rojas et al.,Thermomagnetic properties of the strong coupling in the local Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 054019 [1603.00833]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [32]

    Farias, V.S

    R.L.S. Farias, V.S. Timoteo, S.S. Avancini, M.B. Pinto and G. Krein,Thermo-magnetic effects in quark matter: Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model constrained by lattice QCD,Eur. Phys. J. A53(2017) 101 [1603.03847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [33]

    Cao,Recent progresses on QCD phases in a strong magnetic field: views from Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model,Eur

    G. Cao,Recent progresses on QCD phases in a strong magnetic field: views from Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model,Eur. Phys. J. A57(2021) 264 [2103.00456]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  32. [34]

    Sheng, S.-Y

    X.-L. Sheng, S.-Y. Yang, Y.-L. Zou and D. Hou,Mass splitting and spin alignment forϕmesons in a magnetic field in NJL model,Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 299 [2209.01872]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [35]

    Chahal, S

    N. Chahal, S. Dutt and A. Kumar,Effects of finite volume and magnetic fields on thermodynamic properties of quark matter and fluctuations of conserved charges,Phys. Rev. C107(2023) 045203 [2303.16840]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [36]

    Mao,Correlations and fluctuations in a magnetized PNJL model with and without the inverse magnetic catalysis effect*,Chin

    S. Mao,Correlations and fluctuations in a magnetized PNJL model with and without the inverse magnetic catalysis effect*,Chin. Phys. C49(2025) 063106 [2410.10217]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [37]

    Ali, C.A

    M.S. Ali, C.A. Islam and R. Sharma,QCD phase diagram in the T–eB plane for varying pion mass, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 096011 [2407.14449]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [38]

    Kawaguchi, I

    M. Kawaguchi, I. Siddique and M. Huang,Effect of quark anomalous magnetic moment on neutral dense quark matter under magnetic field,Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) 246 [2408.14808]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [39]

    J. Mei, R. Wen, S. Mao, M. Huang and K. Xu, Magnetic catalysis and diamagnetism from pion fluctuations,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 034024 [2402.19193]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [40]

    Mao and S

    S. Mao and S. Yang,Correlations and fluctuations in a magnetized three-flavor PNJL model with and without inverse magnetic catalysis effect,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) 014026 [2504.14532]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [41]

    Endr¨ odi,QCD equation of state at nonzero magnetic fields in the Hadron Resonance Gas model, JHEP04(2013) 023 [1301.1307]

    G. Endr¨ odi,QCD equation of state at nonzero magnetic fields in the Hadron Resonance Gas model, JHEP04(2013) 023 [1301.1307]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [42]

    Bhattacharyya, S.K

    A. Bhattacharyya, S.K. Ghosh, R. Ray and S. Samanta,Exploring effects of magnetic field on the Hadron Resonance Gas,EPL115(2016) 62003 [1504.04533]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [43]

    Ferreira, P

    M. Ferreira, P. Costa and C. Providˆ encia,Net baryon-number fluctuations in magnetized quark matter,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 034003 [1806.05758]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [44]

    Kadam, S

    G. Kadam, S. Pal and A. Bhattacharyya,Interacting hadron resonance gas model in magnetic field and the fluctuations of conserved charges,J. Phys. G47 (2020) 125106 [1908.10618]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [45]

    Marczenko, M

    M. Marczenko, M. Szyma´ nski, P.M. Lo, B. Karmakar, P. Huovinen, C. Sasaki et al.,Magnetic effects in the hadron resonance gas,Phys. Rev. C110(2024) 065203 [2405.15745]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [46]

    Vovchenko,Magnetic field effect on hadron yield ratios and fluctuations in a hadron resonance gas, Phys

    V. Vovchenko,Magnetic field effect on hadron yield ratios and fluctuations in a hadron resonance gas, Phys. Rev. C110(2024) 034914 [2405.16306]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [47]

    Samanta and W

    R. Samanta and W. Broniowski,Magnetic properties of the hadron resonance gas with physical magnetic moments,2505.14484

    arXiv

  46. [48]

    Blaizot, E.S

    J.-P. Blaizot, E.S. Fraga and L.F. Palhares,Effect of quark masses on the QCD pressure in a strong magnetic background,Phys. Lett. B722(2013) 167 [1211.6412]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [49]

    Second-order quark number susceptibility of deconfined QCD matter in the presence of a magnetic field

    B. Karmakar, N. Haque and M.G. Mustafa, Second-order quark number susceptibility of deconfined QCD matter in the presence of a magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 054004 [2003.11247]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [50]

    Fraga, L.F

    E.S. Fraga, L.F. Palhares and T.E. Restrepo,Cold and dense perturbative QCD in a very strong magnetic background,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 054033 [2312.13952]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [51]

    Fraga, L.F

    E.S. Fraga, L.F. Palhares and T.E. Restrepo, Susceptibilities and Taylor coefficients of magnetic QCD from perturbation theory,2507.14360

    arXiv

  50. [52]

    Rebhan, A

    A. Rebhan, A. Schmitt and S.A. Stricker,Anomalies and the chiral magnetic effect in the Sakai-Sugimoto model,JHEP01(2010) 026 [0909.4782]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  51. [53]

    Preis, A

    F. Preis, A. Rebhan and A. Schmitt,Inverse magnetic catalysis in dense holographic matter,JHEP03(2011) 033 [1012.4785]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  52. [54]

    Spatial modulation and topological current in holographic QCD matter

    K. Fukushima and P. Morales,Spatial modulation and topological current in holographic QCD matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 051601 [1305.4115]. 23

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [55]

    Dudal and T.G

    D. Dudal and T.G. Mertens,Holographic estimate of heavy quark diffusion in a magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D 97(2018) 054035 [1802.02805]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [56]

    Fukushima and A

    K. Fukushima and A. Okutsu,Electric conductivity with the magnetic field and the chiral anomaly in a holographic QCD model,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 054016 [2106.07968]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  55. [57]

    Zhu and D

    Z.-R. Zhu and D. Hou,Inverse magnetic catalysis and energy loss in a holographic QCD model,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 066010 [2305.12375]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [58]

    Critelli, S.I

    R. Critelli, S.I. Finazzo, M. Zaniboni and J. Noronha, Anisotropic shear viscosity of a strongly coupled non-Abelian plasma from magnetic branes,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 066006 [1406.6019]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [59]

    Dudal and T.G

    D. Dudal and T.G. Mertens,Melting of charmonium in a magnetic field from an effective AdS/QCD model, Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 086002 [1410.3297]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [60]

    L. Yin, D. Hou and H.-c. Ren,Chiral magnetic effect and three-point function from AdS/CFT correspondence,JHEP09(2021) 117 [2102.04851]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  59. [61]

    L. Zhu, Z. Gao, W. Ke and H. Zhang,Bayesian inference of the magnetic field and chemical potential on holographic jet quenching in heavy-ion collisions, 2506.00340

    work page arXiv

  60. [62]

    R. Wen, C. Huang and M. Huang,Functional renormalization group study of anomalous magnetic moment in a low energy effective theory,2506.20246

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [63]

    R. Wen, S. Yin, W.-j. Fu and M. Huang,Functional renormalization group study of neutral and charged pions in magnetic fields in the quark-meson model, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 076020 [2306.04045]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  62. [64]

    Mueller and J.M

    N. Mueller and J.M. Pawlowski,Magnetic catalysis and inverse magnetic catalysis in QCD,Phys. Rev. D 91(2015) 116010 [1502.08011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [65]

    Abelian chromomagnetic fields and confinement

    P. Cea and L. Cosmai,Abelian chromomagnetic fields and confinement,JHEP02(2003) 031 [hep-lat/0204023]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  64. [66]

    D’Elia, S

    M. D’Elia, S. Mukherjee and F. Sanfilippo,QCD Phase Transition in a Strong Magnetic Background, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 051501 [1005.5365]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  65. [67]

    G.S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endr¨ odi, S.D. Katz and A. Sch¨ afer,The QCD equation of state in background magnetic fields,JHEP08(2014) 177 [1406.0269]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [68]

    G.S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S.D. Katz, S. Krieg et al.,The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields,JHEP02(2012) 044 [1111.4956]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  67. [69]

    Braguta, M.N

    V.V. Braguta, M.N. Chernodub, A.Y. Kotov, A.V. Molochkov and A.A. Nikolaev,Finite-density QCD transition in a magnetic background field,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 114503 [1909.09547]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  68. [70]

    D’Elia, L

    M. D’Elia, L. Maio, F. Sanfilippo and A. Stanzione, Phase diagram of QCD in a magnetic background, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 034511 [2111.11237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  69. [71]

    H.-T. Ding, C. Schmidt, A. Tomiya and X.-D. Wang, Chiral phase structure of three flavor QCD in a background magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 054505 [2006.13422]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  70. [72]

    D’Elia, L

    M. D’Elia, L. Maio, K. Zambello and G. Zanichelli, Roberge-Weiss transition for QCD in a magnetic background,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 094509 [2502.19294]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [73]

    Astrakhantsev, V.V

    N. Astrakhantsev, V.V. Braguta, M. D’Elia, A.Y. Kotov, A.A. Nikolaev and F. Sanfilippo,Lattice study of the electromagnetic conductivity of the quark-gluon plasma in an external magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 054516 [1910.08516]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  72. [74]

    Velasco, B.B

    E.G. Velasco, B.B. Brandt, F. Cuteri, G. Endr˝ odi and G. Mark´ o,Anomalous transport phenomena on the lattice,PoSLA TTICE2022(2023) 173 [2212.02148]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  73. [75]

    Almirante, N

    G. Almirante, N. Astrakhantsev, V.V. Braguta, M. D’Elia, L. Maio, M. Naviglio et al.,Electrical conductivity of the quark-gluon plasma in the presence of strong magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 034505 [2406.18504]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [76]

    Brandt, G

    B.B. Brandt, G. Endr˝ odi, E. Garnacho-Velasco, G. Mark´ o and A.D.M. Valois,Localized Chiral Magnetic Effect in equilibrium QCD,2409.17616

    arXiv

  75. [77]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia and A. Rucci,Heavy quarkonia in strong magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 054014 [1506.07890]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [78]

    Endr˝ odi and G

    G. Endr˝ odi and G. Mark´ o,Magnetized baryons and the QCD phase diagram: NJL model meets the lattice, JHEP08(2019) 036 [1905.02103]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  77. [79]

    Ding, S.T

    H.T. Ding, S.T. Li, J.H. Liu and X.D. Wang,Chiral condensates and screening masses of neutral pseudoscalar mesons in thermomagnetic QCD medium, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 034514 [2201.02349]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  78. [80]

    Ding, J.-B

    H.-T. Ding, J.-B. Gu, S.-T. Li and R. Thakkar,Chiral condensates and screening masses of neutral pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD at physical quark masses,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 074513 [2501.11262]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [81]

    G.S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S.D. Katz and A. Schafer,QCD quark condensate in external magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 071502 [1206.4205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  80. [82]

    Bruckmann, G

    F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi and T.G. Kovacs,Inverse magnetic catalysis and the Polyakov loop,JHEP04 (2013) 112 [1303.3972]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.