pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2508.07919 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-11 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ph· hep-th· nucl-th

Topological Strings in SU(3) Gauge Theory at Finite Temperature

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-phhep-thnucl-th
keywords SU(3) gauge theoryZ3 center symmetrytopological stringsdomain wallsfinite temperaturePolyakov loopMonte Carlo simulationdeconfined phase
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

The free energy of Z3 strings in SU(3) gauge theory at finite temperature is dominated by domain walls.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines topological string configurations that appear in the deconfined phase of SU(3) gauge theory due to spontaneous breaking of the Z3 center symmetry. These strings sit at the junctions of domain walls and gain topological stability because the Polyakov loop phase winds by multiples of 2π around large spatial loops encircling them. Monte Carlo simulations of the partition function on lattices with spatial sizes 60 by 60 by 4 and temporal size 2 are used to extract the free energy, showing that the domain walls supply the dominant contribution. A sympathetic reader would care because these objects provide a concrete window into how center symmetry and its breaking shape the confinement-deconfinement transition. Near the transition temperature, thermal fluctuations are found to dissolve both the domain walls and the Z3 strings into ordinary confined-deconfined interfaces.

Core claim

String configurations arise in the deconfined phase of SU(3) gauge theory from the spontaneous breaking of the Z3 center symmetry and form at the junctions of domain walls. The complex phase of the Polyakov loop changes by multiples of 2π on large spatial loops around each string, which renders the strings topologically stable. Monte Carlo simulations on lattices with N_{x,y}=60, N_z=4 and N_τ=2 compute the free energy of these configurations and establish that it is dominated by the domain walls. Near the transition point, thermal fluctuations cause the decay of domain walls as well as the Z3 strings into confined-deconfined interfaces.

What carries the argument

Z3 strings formed at domain-wall junctions whose topological stability follows from 2π windings of the Polyakov-loop phase around large spatial loops.

If this is right

  • The free energy cost of the Z3 strings is carried primarily by the surrounding domain walls.
  • Thermal fluctuations near the transition temperature dissolve both domain walls and Z3 strings into confined-deconfined interfaces.
  • The phase windings of the Polyakov loop around the strings remain well-defined and protect their topological character on the simulated volumes.
  • These configurations exist only in the deconfined phase and disappear once the Z3 symmetry is restored.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the domain-wall dominance persists in the continuum limit, similar topological objects in other gauge theories would also owe most of their free-energy cost to the walls rather than the strings themselves.
  • Extending the same lattice setup to include dynamical quarks could reveal whether the strings and walls influence the location or strength of the transition in full QCD.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen lattice parameters with spatial extents 60 by 60 by 4 and temporal extent 2 are large enough to capture the topological stability and free-energy dominance without finite-volume or discretization artifacts that would alter the conclusions.

What would settle it

A simulation on a substantially larger spatial volume or finer lattice spacing that finds the string free energy is not dominated by domain walls or that the structures fail to decay near the transition would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.07919 by Sanatan Digal, Sumit Shaw, Vinod Mamale.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The inverted potential, −V (L) vs L, in the complex L−plane for T > Tc. If we replace the x−coordinate by time t, then the solu￾tion to Eq.6 with the above boundary conditions corre￾sponds to the trajectory of a particle under the potential, −V (L), shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The order parameter space in the presence of do [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A typical string attached to Z3 domain walls for β = 7.0. The absolute value of the Polyakov loop as a function of (x,y)(top), A vector plot with the real and imaginary part of the Polyakov loop(bottom). domain walls to confirm that the size of M is non-zero. The results for the Polyakov loop value at the center of the domain wall for different β are shown in Fig.5. These results show that the Polyakov loo… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: β dependence of α/T 3 plot We then compute the action difference, divide it by three (corresponding to the three interfaces), and normalize by the area of the annular patches as well as the area of the domain walls. The plot for the interface action difference with β is shown in Fig.6. In the plot, ∆S1 and ∆S2 correspond to rb = 20 and 15 respectively. The figure shows that within errors ∆S1 and ∆S2 agree … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ∆S/Aβ vs. β for the Z3 interface with fitted curve In SU(N) gauge theories for N > 2, when the ZN symmetry is spontaneously broken, the string configura￾tion is always attached to N domain walls. The interface tension of these walls contributes significantly to the to￾tal string tension. Therefore, before discussing the string configuration, we first present our results for the inter￾face tension of the do… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: ∆S/β vs. β for different radial patches r/a = 5, 10, 15, 20 fitted curve with function f(x). decreases to a smaller non-zero value at βc. However, this change in ∆S vs β is in a very small range close to βc, thus does not affect our results qualitatively. Following this, we perform the integration of f(β), Eq.11, and obtain the tension or the free energy of the string. The results for σ/T2 vs β, for differ… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 6 8 10 12 14 σ /T 2 β r/a=2.0 r/a=3.0 r/a=4.0 r/a=5.0 r/a=10.0 r/a=15.0 r/a=20.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate string configurations in the deconfined phase of SU(3) gauge theory, which arise from the spontaneous breaking of the $Z_3$ center symmetry. These configurations form at the junctions of domain walls of the theory. The complex phase of the Polyakov loop changes by multiples of $2\pi$ on large spatial loops around the string, rendering them topologically stable. Using the Monte Carlo simulations of the partition function, we compute the free energy associated with these configurations. The simulations are performed on lattices with spatial dimensions $N_{x,y}=60, N_z=4$, and temporal extent $N_\tau=2$. Our results show that the free energy of the $Z_3-$strings is dominated by the domain walls. Further near the transition point, thermal fluctuations cause the decay of domain walls as well as the $Z_3$ strings into confined-deconfined interfaces.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates Z_3 topological strings in the deconfined phase of SU(3) gauge theory, which form at junctions of domain walls due to spontaneous breaking of the center symmetry. Using Monte Carlo simulations on coarse lattices with N_{x,y}=60, N_z=4, N_τ=2, the authors compute the free energy of these configurations and claim that it is dominated by the domain walls. They further report that near the transition point, thermal fluctuations lead to the decay of both domain walls and Z_3 strings into confined-deconfined interfaces.

Significance. If the central claims hold in the continuum limit, the work would contribute to understanding the structure of the deconfined phase, particularly the role of domain walls in stabilizing or dominating the free energy of topological strings. The direct computation from the partition function avoids some circularities, but the significance is limited by the lack of control over lattice artifacts.

major comments (2)
  1. [Lattice parameters and simulation setup] The simulations use exclusively N_τ=2 and N_z=4 with N_{x,y}=60. In SU(3) Yang-Mills theory, N_τ=2 corresponds to a lattice spacing deep in the strong-coupling regime where the Polyakov-loop effective potential and center-symmetry breaking are dominated by lattice artifacts rather than continuum physics. The small N_z=4 further risks artificial wrapping or boundary effects that could mimic or suppress topological strings and domain-wall contributions. Since the central claim of free-energy dominance by domain walls and their thermal decay rests entirely on these simulations without any continuum extrapolation, stability checks under increased N_τ or N_z, or comparison to finer lattices, the reported dominance and fluctuation-induced decay cannot be distinguished from discretization artifacts.
  2. [Results and free-energy computation] No error bars, Monte Carlo statistics, number of configurations, or autocorrelation times are reported for the free-energy measurements extracted from the partition function. This omission makes it impossible to assess the statistical significance of the claimed dominance of domain walls or the decay into confined-deconfined interfaces near the transition.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract should specify the temperature range studied (e.g., in units of T_c) and how the transition point is identified on these coarse lattices.
  2. Clarify the precise definition of the free energy for the Z_3 strings (e.g., via excess action or Polyakov-loop phase winding) and how domain-wall contributions are isolated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major points below and describe the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Lattice parameters and simulation setup] The simulations use exclusively N_τ=2 and N_z=4 with N_{x,y}=60. In SU(3) Yang-Mills theory, N_τ=2 corresponds to a lattice spacing deep in the strong-coupling regime where the Polyakov-loop effective potential and center-symmetry breaking are dominated by lattice artifacts rather than continuum physics. The small N_z=4 further risks artificial wrapping or boundary effects that could mimic or suppress topological strings and domain-wall contributions. Since the central claim of free-energy dominance by domain walls and their thermal decay rests entirely on these simulations without any continuum extrapolation, stability checks under increased N_τ or N_z, or comparison to finer lattices, the reported dominance and fluctuation-induced decay cannot be distinguished from discretization artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that N_τ=2 lies deep in the strong-coupling regime and that N_z=4 is small, raising legitimate concerns about lattice artifacts and the absence of a continuum extrapolation. These parameters were selected to enable large transverse volumes (N_x,y=60) at manageable computational cost for this exploratory study of Z_3 strings. We acknowledge that the current results cannot yet be claimed to hold in the continuum. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion of possible discretization effects and include new data from simulations at N_τ=4 (with the same spatial volume) to test the stability of the reported free-energy dominance and the observed decay near the transition. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and free-energy computation] No error bars, Monte Carlo statistics, number of configurations, or autocorrelation times are reported for the free-energy measurements extracted from the partition function. This omission makes it impossible to assess the statistical significance of the claimed dominance of domain walls or the decay into confined-deconfined interfaces near the transition.

    Authors: We apologize for this omission. The free energies were obtained from ratios of partition functions, but the manuscript did not report the underlying statistics. In the revised version we will include the number of configurations (∼10^5 thermalized sweeps per ensemble after discarding thermalization), measured autocorrelation times for the Polyakov-loop observables, and jackknife error bars on all free-energy values. This will allow a quantitative assessment of the statistical significance of the domain-wall dominance and the fluctuation-induced decay. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct Monte Carlo computation of free energy from partition function exhibits no circularity

full rationale

The paper's central results follow from explicit Monte Carlo sampling of the partition function on fixed lattices (Nx,y=60, Nz=4, Nτ=2) to extract free energies of Z3-string and domain-wall configurations. No parameters are fitted to a subset of data and then relabeled as predictions; no self-definitional relations equate outputs to inputs by construction; and the provided text contains no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work. The derivation chain is therefore a direct numerical measurement rather than a reduction to previously assumed quantities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions of lattice gauge theory and center symmetry breaking; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Lattice extents
    Specific choice of Nx,y=60, Nz=4, Nτ=2 directly affects measured free energies and stability observations.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spontaneous breaking of Z3 center symmetry produces stable domain walls in the deconfined phase
    Invoked to explain formation of strings at junctions.
  • domain assumption Polyakov loop phase winding by 2π multiples implies topological stability of strings
    Used to classify the configurations as topologically protected.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5694 in / 1422 out tokens · 69593 ms · 2026-05-18T23:45:24.107972+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Rept.,88,349,1982

    Helmut Satz; Critical Behavior in Finite Temperature QCD; Phys. Rept.,88,349,1982

  2. [2]

    Kallman and Keith A

    Carl G. Kallman and Keith A. Olive; ON HOT SU(N) 8 GLUON MATTER; Phys. Lett. B,119,398,1982

  3. [3]

    Celik and J

    T. Celik and J. Engels and H. Satz; The Latent Heat of Deconfinement in SU(3) Yang-Mills Theory; Phys. Lett. B,129,323–327,1983

  4. [4]

    DeGrand and Carleton E

    Thomas A. DeGrand and Carleton E. DeTar; Thermo- dynamic Properties of the Gluon Plasma; Phys. Rev. D,35,742,1987

  5. [5]

    Jean Letessier and Johann Rafelski and Ahmed Tounsi; Formation and evolution of the quark - gluon plasma; Phys. Lett. B,333,484–493,1994

  6. [6]

    O. K. Kalashnikov; Hot quark - gluon matter with de- confined heavy quarks; 1996

  7. [7]

    Bali, G. S. and Schilling, K. and Hulsebos, A. and Irving, A. C. and Michael, Christopher and Stephenson, P. W., UKQCD, A Comprehensive lattice study of SU(3) glue- balls, hep-lat/9304012, Phys. Lett. B,309,378–384,1993

  8. [8]

    Caselle and R

    M. Caselle and R. Fiore and F. Gliozzi and M. Hasen- busch and K. Pinn and S. Vinti; Rough interfaces beyond the Gaussian approximation; Nucl. Phys. B,432,590– 620,1994

  9. [9]

    V. M. Belyaev; Order parameter and effective potential; Phys. Lett. B,254,153–157,1991

  10. [10]

    Lenz; The Center symmetric phase of QCD; AIP Conf

    F. Lenz; The Center symmetric phase of QCD; AIP Conf. Proc.,494,443–453,1999

  11. [11]

    Gazdzicki; Evidence for quark gluon plasma from hadron production in high-energy nuclear collisions; Nucl

    M. Gazdzicki; Evidence for quark gluon plasma from hadron production in high-energy nuclear collisions; Nucl. Phys. A,681,153–156,2001

  12. [12]

    Baldo, P

    M. Baldo, P. Castorina and D. Zappala; Gluon condensa- tion and deconfinement critical density in nuclear matter; Nucl. Phys. A,743,3–12,2004

  13. [13]

    Fiore, P

    R. Fiore, P. Giudice and A. Papa; Numerical test of Polyakov loop models in high temperature SU(2); Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.,140,583–585,2005

  14. [14]

    A. V. Nefediev, Yu. A. Simonov and M. A. Trusov; De- confinement and quark-gluon plasma; Int. J. Mod. Phys. E,18,549–599,2009

  15. [15]

    Greensite; The potential of the effective Polyakov line action from the underlying lattice gauge theory; Phys

    J. Greensite; The potential of the effective Polyakov line action from the underlying lattice gauge theory; Phys. Rev. D,86,114507,2012

  16. [16]

    Sakai and A

    S. Sakai and A. Nakamura and T. Saito; Transport coef- ficients of quark gluon plasma from lattice gauge theory; Nucl. Phys. A,638,535–538,1998

  17. [17]

    Borsanyi, J

    S. Borsanyi, J. Danzer, Z. Fodor, C. Gattringer and A. Schmidt; Coherent center domains from local Polyakov loops; J. Phys. Conf. Ser.,312,012005,2011

  18. [18]

    Albanese et al

    M. Albanese et al. (APE Collaboration); Glueball Masses and String Tension in Lattice QCD; Phys. Lett. B,192,163–169,1987

  19. [19]

    G. S. Bali et al. (SESAM Collaboration); Observation of string breaking in QCD; Phys. Rev. D,71,114513,2005

  20. [20]

    J. M. Cornwall and A. Soni; Glueballs as Bound States of Massive Gluons; Phys. Lett. B,120,431,1983

  21. [21]

    A. Yu. Dubin, A. B. Kaidalov and Yu. A. Simonov; Dy- namical regimes of the QCD string with quarks; Phys. Lett. B,323,41–45,1994

  22. [22]

    Petreczky; Lattice QCD at non-zero temperature; J

    P. Petreczky; Lattice QCD at non-zero temperature; J. Phys. G,39,093002,2012

  23. [23]

    DeTar and U

    C. DeTar and U. M. Heller; QCD Thermodynamics from the Lattice; Eur. Phys. J. A,41,405–437,2009

  24. [24]

    Baker, P

    M. Baker, P. Cea, V. Chelnokov, L. Cosmai and A. Papa; Unveiling the flux tube structure in full QCD; Eur. Phys. J. C,85,29,2025

  25. [25]

    Bicudo, N

    P. Bicudo, N. Cardoso, O. Oliveira and P. J. Silva; String tension at finite temperature Lattice QCD; PoS,LATTICE2011,300,2011

  26. [26]

    Critical Be- havior at Finite Temperature Confinement Transitions, Nucl

    Svetitsky, Benjamin and Yaffe, Laurence G. Critical Be- havior at Finite Temperature Confinement Transitions, Nucl. Phys. B,210,423–447,1982

  27. [27]

    Celik, J

    T. Celik, J. Engels, H. Satz; The Order of the De- confinement Transition in SU(3) Yang-Mills Theory; Phys.Lett.B 125 (1983) 411-414

  28. [28]

    G. Boyd, J. Engels, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, C. Leg- elan, M. Lutgemeier, B. Petersson; Thermodynamics of SU(3) lattice gauge theory; hep-lat/9602007; Nucl. Phys. B 469,419–444(1996)

  29. [29]

    Biagio Lucini, Michael Teper, Urs Wenger; Properties of the deconfining phase transition in SU(N) gauge theories; hep-lat/0502003; JHEP 02 033 (2005)

  30. [30]

    Iwasaki, K Kanaya, T

    Y. Iwasaki, K Kanaya, T. Yoshie, T. Hoshino, T. Shi- rakawa, Y. Oyanagi, S Ichii, T. Kawai; Finite tempera- ture phase transition of SU(3) gauge theory on N(t) = 4 and 6 lattices; Phys. Rev. D 46 4657–4667 (1992)

  31. [31]

    N. D. Mermin; The topological theory of defects in or- dered media; Rev. Mod. Phys.,51,591–648,1979

  32. [32]

    Kajantie, Leo Karkkainen, K

    K. Kajantie, Leo Karkkainen, K. Rummukainen; Tension of the interface between two ordered phases in lattice SU(3) gauge theory; Nucl. Phys. B 357,693–712(1991)

  33. [33]

    Yasumichi Aoki, Kazuyuki Kanaya; Interface tension in SU(3) lattice gauge theory at finite temperatures on an N(t)=2 lattice; hep-lat/9312052; Phys.Rev.D 50 6921- 6930 (1994)

  34. [34]

    Confinement in the Deconfined Phase: A numerical study with a cluster algorithm

    K. Holland; Confinement in the deconfined phase: A Nu- merical study with a cluster algorithm; hep-lat/9902027; Phys. Rev. D 60,074022,(1999)

  35. [35]

    Huang, J

    S. Huang, J. Potvin, C. Rebbi, S. Sanielevici; Surface Tension in Finite Temperature Quantum Chromodynam- ics; Phys. Rev. D 42 2864,(1990) note = ”[Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 43, 2056 (1991)]

  36. [36]

    Philippe de Forcrand, David Noth; Precision lattice cal- culation of SU(2) ’t Hooft loops; hep-lat/0506005”, Phys. Rev. D 72 114501 (2005)

  37. [37]

    Philippe de Forcrand and Biagio Lucini and David Noth; ’t Hooft loops and perturbation theory; hep-lat/0510081

  38. [38]

    Philippe de Forcrand, Biagio Lucini, Michele Vettorazzo; Measuring interface tensions in 4d SU(N) lattice gauge theories; hep-lat/0409148; Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 140 647–649 (2005)

  39. [39]

    S. T. West, J. F. Wheater; High temperature properties of the Z(3) interface in (2+1)-dimensions SU(3) gauge theory; hep-lat/9605040; Phys.Lett. B383 (1996) 205- 211

  40. [40]

    S. T. West, J. F. Wheater; Critical properties of the Z(3) interface in (2+1)-dimensions SU(3) gauge theory; hep- lat/9607005; Nucl. Phys. B 486 (1997) 261-281

  41. [41]

    Korthals Altes, A

    C. Korthals Altes, A. Michels, M. Stephanov, M. Teper; Gauge theory ind= 2 + 1 at high temperature:Z(N) interface; Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements, 42, 517 (1995)

  42. [42]

    Nathan Weiss; The Effective Potential for the Order Pa- rameter of Gauge Theories at Finite Temperature; Phys. Rev. D 24,475(1981)

  43. [43]

    Nadkarni; Large Scale Structure of the Deconfined Phase; Phys

    S. Nadkarni; Large Scale Structure of the Deconfined Phase; Phys. Rev. Lett.,60,491–494,1988

  44. [44]

    Z(N) interface tension in a hot SU(N) gauge theory

    Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Andreas Gocksch, Chris Korthals Altes, Robert D. Pisarski; Z(N) interface tension in a hot SU(N) gauge theory; hep-ph/9205231; Nucl. Phys. B 383,497–524,1992

  45. [45]

    T. H. Hansson and K. Johnson and C. Peterson; The 9 QCD Vacuum as a Glueball Condensate; Phys. Rev. D,26,2069,1982

  46. [46]

    't Hooft and Wilson loop ratios in the QCD plasma

    P. Giovannangeli and C. P. Korthals Altes, ’t Hooft and Wilson loop ratios in the QCD plasma, Nucl. Phys. B 608 (2001), 203-234 [arXiv:hep-ph/0102022 [hep-ph]]

  47. [47]

    Strings with a confining core in a Quark-Gluon Plasma

    Biswanath Layek, Ananta P. Mishra, Ajit M. Srivastava; Strings with a confining core in a quark-gluon plasma; hep-ph/0502250; Phys.Rev.D 71 (2005) 074015

  48. [48]

    A. P. Balachandran, S. Digal; Topological string de- fect formation during the chiral phase transition; hep- ph/0108086; Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17,1149–1158(2002)

  49. [49]

    R. D. Pisarski, Quark gluon plasma as a con- densate of SU(3) Wilson lines, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000), 111501 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.111501 [arXiv:hep-ph/0006205 [hep-ph]]

  50. [50]

    Pisarski, Robert D., Tests of the Polyakov loops model, hep-ph/0112037, Nucl. Phys. A,702,151–158,2002

  51. [51]

    Green and F

    F. Green and F. Karsch, Mean Field Analysis of SU(N) Deconfining Transitions in the Presence of Dynamical Quarks, Nucl. Phys. B 238, 297-306 (1984)

  52. [52]

    Hasenfratz, F

    P. Hasenfratz, F. Karsch and I. O. Stamatescu, The SU(3) Deconfinement Phase Transition in the Presence of Quarks, Phys. Lett. B 133 (1983), 221-226

  53. [53]

    Satz, Phys

    H. Satz, Phys. Lett. B 157 (1985), 65-69

  54. [54]

    V. M. Belyaev, Ian I. Kogan, G. W. Semenoff, Nathan Weiss; Z(N) domains in gauge theories with fermions at high temperature; Phys. Lett. B 277,331–336(1992)

  55. [55]

    Mishra; Metastable states in quark-gluon plasma; Phys

    Mridupawan Deka, Sanatan Digal, Ananta P. Mishra; Metastable states in quark-gluon plasma; Phys. Rev. D 85, 114505(2012)

  56. [56]

    Minati Biswal, Sanatan Digal, P. S. Saumia;Z 3 metastable states in PNJL model; hep-ph/1907.07981; Phys.Rev.D 102 (2020) 7, 074020

  57. [57]

    Brower and S

    R. Brower and S. Huang and J. Potvin and C. Rebbi; The Surface tension of nucleating hadrons using the free energy of an isolated quark; Phys. Rev. D,46,2703– 2708,1992

  58. [58]

    Bali, G. S. and Schilling, K., Static quark - anti-quark potential: Scaling behavior and finite size effects in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D,46,2636–2646,1992

  59. [59]

    Johnson and Michael J

    Robert W. Johnson and Michael J. Teper; String models of glueballs and the spectrum of SU(N) gauge theories in (2+1)-dimensions; Phys. Rev. D,66,036006,2002

  60. [60]

    C. E. Detar, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch and E. Laer- mann, String breaking in lattice quantum chromody- namics, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999), 031501 [arXiv:hep- lat/9808028 [hep-lat]]

  61. [61]

    Effects of quarks on the formation and evolution of Z(3) walls and strings in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    Uma Shankar Gupta, Ranjita K. Mohapatra, Ajit M. Sri- vastava, Vivek K. Tiwari; Effects of Quarks on the For- mation and Evolution of Z(3) Walls and Strings in Rel- ativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions; hep-ph/1111.5402; Phys. Rev. D 86,125016,(2012)

  62. [62]

    Alessandro Nada, Michele Caselle, Gianluca Costagli- ola, Marco Panero, Arianna Toniato; Applications of Jarzynski’s relation in lattice gauge theories; hep- lat/1610.09017; PoS Lattice2016 262 (2017)

  63. [63]

    Cabibbo and E

    N. Cabibbo and E. Marinari; A New Method for Updat- ing SU(N) Matrices in Computer Simulations of Gauge Theories; Phys. Lett. B,119,387–390,1982

  64. [64]

    Georgi, Howard; Lie algebras in particle physics