Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Efficient computation of average subsystem Bures distance between fermionic Gaussian states

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper contends that the average Bures distance between reduced eigenstates grows linearly with subsystem size in an integrable chain, stays non-linear in chaotic Gaussian models, and traces this to local conserved charges.

desk verdict Promising algorithm and useful new numerics, but the conserved-charge ordering convention is load-bearing and needs defense; our copy of the full text was unreadable. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09417 v2 pith:LLREFH3L submitted 2025-08-13 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-th

classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechhep-th
keywords BuresdistancefermionicGaussianstatesquantummany-bodychaosintegrabilitytransverse-fieldIsingchainSYKmodelsubsystemlocalconservedcharges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum many-body chaos is often diagnosed by how distinguishable the reduced states of nearby eigenstates are, but computations are expensive and, in integrable chains, ambiguous because degenerate eigenstates can be ordered many ways. This paper removes the cost barrier for a class of states: it develops an efficient algorithm for the Bures distance between fermionic Gaussian states, whose full information is contained in their two-point correlation functions. Using that algorithm, the authors compute the average subsystem Bures distance for the transverse-field Ising chain, the Dirac SYK2 model, and random pure fermionic Gaussian states. They report linear growth with subsystem size for the integrable Ising chain, consistent with an earlier conjecture, and no linear growth for the chaotic SYK2 model or random Gaussian states. They attribute the contrast to discontinuities of local conserved charges across the spectrum in integrable models.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Bures distance between fermionic Gaussian states, computed from single-particle covariance matrices rather than full density matrices, which makes large system sizes feasible. The second load-bearing piece is the ordering of degenerate Ising-chain eigenstates by simultaneous eigenvalues of all local conserved charges; this prescription fixes the previously ambiguous averaging over degenerate states. The combination yields the average subsystem Bures distance, whose scaling with subsystem size is the diagnostic.

What would settle it

Within one degenerate energy subspace of the transverse-field Ising chain, apply random unitary rotations among the degenerate eigenstates, recompute the average subsystem Bures distance using this alternative basis, and compare the scaling with subsystem size. Linear growth that survives random rotations would confirm the model-level claim; linear growth that disappears would show the result came from the charge-ordering convention.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes a computational route to a previously expensive quantity: the Bures distance, a fidelity-based distance measuring how distinguishable two quantum states are, for fermionic Gaussian states. With that route, the authors compute the average subsystem Bures distance over eigenstates and show a sharp scaling contrast at system sizes beyond previous reach. Simultaneous eigenstates of the local conserved charges in the spin-1/2 transverse-field Ising chain show average subsystem Bures distance growing linearly with subsystem size, while Dirac SYK2 and random pure Gaussian states do not. The paper also argues that the origin of the integrable linear growth is

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that ordering degenerate Ising-chain eigenstates by all local conserved charges is a canonical, bias-free prescription; if another legitimate ordering changed the average scaling, the linear-growth conclusion would not be robust.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Average subsystem Bures distance can serve as a computable, size-scalable indicator: linear growth with subsystem size signals integrability, non-linear growth signals chaos, at least within Gaussian fermionic models.
  • The covariance-matrix Bures algorithm extends numerical access to larger one-dimensional and quadratic-fermion systems than full density-matrix computations allowed.
  • The discontinuity of local conserved charges across the spectrum becomes a structural predictor: models whose conserved charges are smooth across the spectrum should be expected to behave chaotically by this measure.
  • Random pure fermionic Gaussian states reproduce the chaotic side of the contrast, providing a null model for average subsystem distances.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The linear-growth claim is defined relative to the chosen ordering of degenerate eigenstates; a random unitary reordering within each degenerate subspace would test whether the scaling is a property of the model or of the ordering rule.
  • Because the algorithm is restricted to fermionic Gaussian states, extending the diagnostic to strongly interacting, non-Gaussian models would require another method; the mechanism the paper proposes suggests the scaling contrast may persist, but that is not established here.
  • The same covariance-matrix formalism could be used to compute other state-distinguishability measures between fermionic Gaussian states at comparable sizes, which may sharpen the chaotic-versus-integrable contrast.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to develop an efficient algorithm for computing the Bures distance between fermionic Gaussian states, enabling larger system sizes. Using this algorithm, the authors compute the average subsystem Bures distance for eigenstates of the transverse-field Ising chain, the Dirac SYK$_2$ model, and random pure fermionic Gaussian states. For the Ising chain, degeneracies are handled by considering simultaneous eigenstates of all local conserved charges and ordering degenerate states by these charges. The authors report that the Ising-chain results are consistent with an earlier conjecture of linear growth of the average subsystem Bures distance with subsystem size, while Dirac SYK$_2$ and random Gaussian states do not show such linear increase. They attribute this distinction to discontinuities of local conserved charges across the spectrum in integrable models.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide an efficient numerical tool for probing many-body integrability and chaos via the average subsystem Bures distance, extending earlier work on trace distance to a metric that is computationally more demanding but potentially more sensitive. The proposed distinction between integrable and chaotic systems---linear versus nonlinear growth of the average subsystem Bures distance---would be a concrete, falsifiable diagnostic. However, several load-bearing aspects are unverifiable from the submitted manuscript: the algorithm is not actually presented in readable form, the numerical results have no visible error bars or finite-size analysis, and the basis-ordering convention for degenerate Ising eigenstates may itself determine the linear-growth behavior. If the ordering dependence is real, the headline result would be an artifact of a particular convention rather than a robust observable signature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text / entire manuscript] The supplied full text is unreadable: it consists of mojibake and includes a header from a different arXiv ID (2508.09416, physics.flu-dyn). No derivations, algorithm pseudocode, numerical tables, or control analyses are accessible. This is a fundamental deficiency: the central claims of the abstract---efficient computation, system sizes, scaling results, and the conserved-charge origin---cannot be checked in any way. The manuscript must be resubmitted with the correct, readable full text before further review.
  2. [Abstract, degeneracy-ordering sentence] The abstract states that degeneracy in the Ising chain is handled by considering simultaneous eigenstates of all local conserved charges and using these charges to order degenerate states. The Bures distance between two states depends on the choice of basis within each degenerate subspace; any unitary rotation within a degenerate subspace yields another valid set of Hamiltonian eigenstates and generally changes the average subsystem Bures distance. The abstract provides no argument that the reported linear growth is independent of this ordering choice. If the scaling depends on the ordering, the purported integrability-vs-chaos distinction is a convention-dependent artifact. This matter is load-bearing and must be addressed explicitly.
  3. [Abstract, final sentence] The claim that 'the distinct scaling ... originates from discontinuities of local conserved charges across the spectrum' is asserted without supporting argument. Moreover, the same conserved charges are used to define the ordering of degenerate states, so the explanatory mechanism and the definition of the computed quantity are not independent. The authors need to show that the discontinuity property is a property of the integrable model itself, not an artifact of the chosen ordering within degenerate subspaces, and that the mechanism can be tested independently of that ordering.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, first sentence vs. title] The first sentence refers to the 'average subsystem trace distance' as the proposed indicator, while the title and the rest of the abstract concern the Bures distance. The relationship between these two measures and the motivation for switching to Bures distance should be clarified.
  2. [Abstract, model definitions] The acronym SYK$_2$ is used without definition or citation. Since the paper targets a broad quantum-information and many-body physics audience, a brief definition or reference is needed.
  3. [Manuscript preparation] The full text contains a header from a different arXiv submission and is garbled, indicating a failure in manuscript preparation. This must be corrected before any substantive review can continue.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No demonstrated circularity: the degenerate-state ordering by conserved charges is entangled with the proposed mechanism, but the central computational results are self-contained.

full rationale

The abstract is the only reliably readable portion; the supplied full text is mojibake and even carries a header from a different arXiv ID (2508.09416, physics.flu-dyn), so citations, derivations, and numerical controls cannot be inspected. Within the readable abstract, I find no step that reduces to its own input by construction. The efficient Bures-distance algorithm for fermionic Gaussian states and the average-distance computations for Dirac SYK2 and random Gaussian states are self-contained: no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the SYK2/random-state comparisons provide external controls against which the integrable-chain result is contrasted. The appeal to 'the earlier conjecture of a linear growth' is an external benchmark rather than a derivation input. The one structurally self-referential element is the treatment of Ising degeneracy: the average is defined by ordering degenerate eigenstates by the eigenvalues of all local conserved charges, and the same charges' discontinuities are then invoked as the origin of the distinct scaling. This couples the measure's construction to its proposed explanation, and the abstract gives no argument that the scaling is independent of the ordering choice within degenerate subspaces. That is a robustness/basis-dependence concern rather than a demonstrated circle: the linear growth is a computed number, not a consequence of the ordering rule. Because the full text is inaccessible, I cannot check whether a basis-independence argument or an explicit derivation from the charge structure is provided. Under the rule that circularity must be exhibited by specific reduction rather than suspected, this warrants a low score with a caveat, not a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review: the full text supplied was corrupted and unreadable, so the ledger captures what is visible from the abstract. No new physical entities are postulated. The main added conceptual content is the conserved-charge ordering scheme and the causal account via discontinuities of local conserved charges, and both rest on assumptions that cannot be checked here. The linear-growth coefficient is flagged as a potential fitted parameter.

free parameters (1)
  • Slope of the linear growth of the average subsystem Bures distance with subsystem size, if extracted by numerical fit
    The abstract reports consistency with a linear-growth conjecture; if the growth coefficient is obtained by fitting numerical data it is a fitted parameter carrying the scaling claim. Not assessable from the abstract.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Eigenstates of the models studied (transverse-field Ising chain, Dirac SYK2) are representable as fermionic Gaussian states with known covariance matrices.
    The efficient Bures-distance computation over covariance matrices requires this representation; standard in free-fermion solving of these models, but it restricts the algorithm's domain.
  • domain assumption Average subsystem Bures distance is a valid and faithful indicator of quantum chaos versus integrability, as the trace-distance variant was proposed to be.
    Inherited from the prior program on average subsystem trace distance; if the measure does not track chaos, the interpretation of the scaling difference collapses.
  • domain assumption Ordering degenerate eigenstates by simultaneous eigenvalues of all local conserved charges does not bias the computed average.
    Introduced in this paper to resolve degeneracy in the Ising chain; the linear-growth conclusion depends on this ordering being representative.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient computation of average subsystem Bures distance between fermionic Gaussian states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LLREFH3L

@misc{pith2026250809417,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient computation of average subsystem Bures distance between fermionic Gaussian states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LLREFH3L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09417}
}
abstract

The average subsystem trace distance has been proposed as an indicator of quantum many-body chaos and integrability. However, evaluating it presents two main difficulties: high computational cost for large systems and ambiguities in defining and ordering eigenstates in integrable systems. In this work, we develop an efficient algorithm to compute the Bures distance between fermionic Gaussian states, enabling access to larger system sizes. Using this method, we calculate the average subsystem Bures distance for eigenstates in the spin-1/2 transverse-field Ising chain and the Dirac fermion formulation of the quadratic Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (Dirac SYK$_2$) model, as well as for random pure fermionic Gaussian states. To handle degeneracy in the Ising chain, we consider simultaneous eigenstates of all local conserved charges and employ these charges to systematically order degenerate states. Our results are consistent with the earlier conjecture of a linear growth with subsystem size. We show that the distinct scaling of the average subsystem distances in chaotic versus integrable systems originates from discontinuities of local conserved charges across the spectrum in integrable models. For the Dirac SYK$_2$ model and random pure Gaussian states, we obtain similar results for the average subsystem distances, which do not show a linear increase.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Discrete power-law decay of subsystem distance after a quantum quench

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For quenches in the transverse-field Ising chain, the Bures distance between the time-evolved subsystem state and its stationary generalized Gibbs ensemble decays as t^-λ, with λ taking only a few discrete values.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Caux and J

    J.-S. Caux and J. Mossel, Remarks on the notion of quantum integrability , J. Stat. Mech. (2011) P02023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2011/02/P02023, [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.3587 arXiv:1012.3587 ]

  2. [2]

    M. V. Berry and M. Tabor , Level Clustering in the Regular Spectrum , http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1977.0140 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 356 , 375--394 (1977)

  3. [3]

    Bohigas , M

    O. Bohigas , M. J. Giannoni and C. Schmit , Characterization of Chaotic Quantum Spectra and Universality of Level Fluctuation Laws , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1 Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 , 1--4 (1984)

  4. [4]

    Global properties of the spectrum of the Haldane-Shastry spin chain

    F. Finkel and A. Gonz \'a lez-L \'o pez , Global properties of the spectrum of the Haldane-Shastry spin chain , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.174411 Phys. Rev. B 72 , 174411 (2005) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0509032 arXiv:cond-mat/0509032 ]

  5. [5]

    L. M. Sieberer , T. Olsacher , A. Elben , M. Heyl , P. Hauke , F. Haake and P. Zoller , Digital quantum simulation, Trotter errors, and quantum chaos of the kicked top , http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0192-5 npj Quantum Inf. 5 , 78 (2019) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.05876 arXiv:1812.05876 ]

  6. [6]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov , Quasiclassical Method in the Theory of Superconductivity , Sov. Phys. JETP 28 , 1200 (1969)

  7. [7]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)106 JHEP 08 (2016) 106 , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01409 arXiv:1503.01409 ]

  8. [8]

    Weak Quantum Chaos

    I. Kukuljan, S. Grozdanov and T. Prosen, Weak Quantum Chaos , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.060301 Phys. Rev. B 96 , 060301 (2017) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.09147 arXiv:1701.09147 ]

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    E. B. Rozenbaum, L. A. Bunimovich and V. Galitski, Early-Time Exponential Instabilities in Nonchaotic Quantum Systems , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.014101 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 , 014101 (2020) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.05466 arXiv:1902.05466 ]

  2. [10]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.43.2046 Phys. Rev. A 43 , 2046--2049 (1991)

  3. [11]

    Srednicki, Chaos and Quantum Thermalization , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.888 Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and Quantum Thermalization , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.888 Phys. Rev. E 50 , 888--901 (1994) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9403051 arXiv:cond-mat/9403051 ]

  4. [12]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06838 Nature 452 , 854--858 (2008) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.1324 arXiv:0708.1324 ]

  5. [13]

    Dymarsky, N

    A. Dymarsky, N. Lashkari and H. Liu, Subsystem eigenstate thermalization hypothesis , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.012140 Phys. Rev. E 97 , 012140 (2018) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08764 arXiv:1611.08764 ]

  6. [14]

    Vidmar, L

    L. Vidmar, L. Hackl, E. Bianchi and M. Rigol, Entanglement Entropy of Eigenstates of Quadratic Fermionic Hamiltonians , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.020601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 , 020601 (2017) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.02979 arXiv:1703.02979 ]

  7. [15]

    Vidmar, L

    L. Vidmar, L. Hackl, E. Bianchi and M. Rigol, Volume Law and Quantum Criticality in the Entanglement Entropy of Excited Eigenstates of the Quantum Ising Model , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.220602 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 , 220602 (2018) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1808...

  8. [16]

    Hackl, L

    L. Hackl, L. Vidmar, M. Rigol and E. Bianchi, Average eigenstate entanglement entropy of the XY chain in a transverse field and its universality for translationally invariant quadratic fermionic models , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.075123 Phys. Rev. B 99 , 075123 (20...

  9. [17]

    Jafarizadeh and M

    A. Jafarizadeh and M. Rajabpour, Bipartite entanglement entropy of the excited states of free fermions and harmonic oscillators , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.165135 Phys. Rev. B 100 , 165135 (2019) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09806 arXiv:1907.09806 ]

  10. [18]

    yd\.zba, M

    P. yd\.zba, M. Rigol and L. Vidmar, Eigenstate Entanglement Entropy in Random Quadratic Hamiltonians , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.180604 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 , 180604 (2020) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11302 arXiv:2006.11302 ]

  11. [19]

    yd\.zba, M

    P. yd\.zba, M. Rigol and L. Vidmar, Entanglement in many-body eigenstates of quantum-chaotic quadratic Hamiltonians , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.104206 Phys. Rev. B 103 , 104206 (2021) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05309 arXiv:2101.05309 ]

  12. [20]

    Khasseh, J

    R. Khasseh, J. Zhang, M. Heyl and M. A. Rajabpour, Identifying Quantum Many-Body Integrability and Chaos Using Eigenstate Trace Distances , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.216701 Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 , 216701 (2023) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13218 arXiv:2301.13218 ]

  13. [21]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 10th anniversary ed., 2010, 10.1017/CBO9780511976667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667

  14. [22]

    Kudler-Flam, Relative Entropy of Random States and Black Holes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.171603 Phys

    J. Kudler-Flam, Relative Entropy of Random States and Black Holes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.171603 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 , 171603 (2021) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.05053 arXiv:2102.05053 ]

  15. [23]

    Kudler-Flam, V

    J. Kudler-Flam, V. Narovlansky and S. Ryu, Distinguishing Random and Black Hole Microstates , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040340 PRX Quantum 2 , 040340 (2021) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.00011 arXiv:2108.00011 ]

  16. [24]

    J. T. de Miranda and T. Micklitz, Subsystem trace-distances of two random states , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/acc770 J. Phys. A 56 , 175301 (2023) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03213 arXiv:2210.03213 ]

  17. [25]

    Bures, An extension of kakutani's theorem on infinite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite ^* -algebras, http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1969-0236719-2 Trans

    D. Bures, An extension of kakutani's theorem on infinite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite ^* -algebras, http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1969-0236719-2 Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 135 , 199--212 (1969)

  18. [26]

    Jozsa , Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States , http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500349414552171 J

    R. Jozsa , Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States , http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500349414552171 J. Mod. Opt. 41 , 2315--2323 (1994)

  19. [27]

    Fagotti and P

    M. Fagotti and P. Calabrese, Entanglement entropy of two disjoint blocks in XY chains , J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P04016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2010/04/P04016, [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1110 arXiv:1003.1110 ]

  20. [28]

    Banchi , P

    L. Banchi , P. Giorda and P. Zanardi , Quantum information-geometry of dissipative quantum phase transitions , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.022102 Phys. Rev. E 89 , 022102 (2014) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4527 arXiv:1305.4527 ]

  21. [29]

    A. J. Baldwin and J. A. Jones, Efficiently computing the Uhlmann fidelity for density matrices , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.012427 Phys. Rev. A 107 , 012427 (2023) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02623 arXiv:2211.02623 ]

  22. [30]

    Zhang and M

    J. Zhang and M. A. Rajabpour, Trace distance between fermionic Gaussian states from a truncation method , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.022414 Phys. Rev. A 108 , 022414 (2023) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11865 arXiv:2210.11865 ]

  23. [31]

    Vidal, J

    G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico and A. Kitaev, Entanglement in Quantum Critical Phenomena , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.227902 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 , 227902 (2003) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0211074 arXiv:quant-ph/0211074 ]

  24. [32]

    J. I. Latorre, E. Rico and G. Vidal, Ground state entanglement in quantum spin chains , http://dx.doi.org/10.26421/QIC4.1 Quant. Inf. Comput. 4 , 48 (2004) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0304098 arXiv:quant-ph/0304098 ]

  25. [33]

    Grady , Infinite set of conserved charges in the Ising model , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.25.1103 Phys

    M. Grady , Infinite set of conserved charges in the Ising model , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.25.1103 Phys. Rev. D 25 , 1103--1113 (1982)

  26. [34]

    Prosen , Quantum invariants of motion in a generic many-body system , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/31/37/004 J

    T. Prosen , Quantum invariants of motion in a generic many-body system , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/31/37/004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 , L645--L653 (1998) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9803358 arXiv:cond-mat/9803358 ]

  27. [35]

    Fagotti and F

    M. Fagotti and F. H. Essler, Reduced density matrix after a quantum quench, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.245107 Phys. Rev. B 87 , 245107 (2013) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6944 arXiv:1302.6944 ]

  28. [36]

    E. H. Lieb, T. Schultz and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4 Annals Phys. 16 , 407 (1961)

  29. [37]

    Katsura, Statistical mechanics of the anisotropic linear Heisenberg model , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.127.1508 Phys

    S. Katsura, Statistical mechanics of the anisotropic linear Heisenberg model , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.127.1508 Phys. Rev. 127 , 1508 (1962)

  30. [38]

    Pfeuty, The one-dimensional Ising model with a transverse field , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(70)90270-8 Annals Phys

    P. Pfeuty, The one-dimensional Ising model with a transverse field , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(70)90270-8 Annals Phys. 57 , 79 (1970)

  31. [39]

    Vidmar and M

    L. Vidmar and M. Rigol, Generalized gibbs ensemble in integrable lattice models, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 064007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2016/06/064007, [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.03990 arXiv:1604.03990 ]

  32. [40]

    A. C. Cassidy , C. W. Clark and M. Rigol , Generalized Thermalization in an Integrable Lattice System , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.140405 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 , 140405 (2011) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1008.4794 arXiv:1008.4794 ]

  33. [41]

    Wang , S.-J

    Q.-Q. Wang , S.-J. Tao , W.-W. Pan , Z. Chen , G. Chen , K. Sun , J.-S. Xu , X.-Y. Xu , Y.-J. Han , C.-F. Li and G.-C. Guo , Experimental verification of generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis in an integrable system , http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-00887-5 Lig...

  34. [42]

    Caux, The Bethe Wavefunction [Translated from M

    J.-S. Caux, The Bethe Wavefunction [Translated from M. Gaudin, La Fonction d'Onde de Bethe. Masson, 1983.] . Cambridge University Press, 2014, 10.1017/CBO9781107053885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107053885

  35. [43]

    Franchini, An introduction to integrable techniques for one-dimensional quantum systems , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48487-7 Lect

    F. Franchini, An introduction to integrable techniques for one-dimensional quantum systems , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48487-7 Lect. Notes Phys. 940 , (2017) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02100 arXiv:1609.02100 ]

  36. [44]

    A. W. Sandvik, Computational Studies of Quantum Spin Systems , http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3518900 AIP Conf. Proc. 1297 , 135 (2010) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.3281 arXiv:1101.3281 ]

  37. [45]

    Ilievski, M

    E. Ilievski, M. Medenjak and T. Prosen, Quasilocal Conserved Operators in the Isotropic Heisenberg Spin-1/2 Chain , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.120601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 120601 (2015) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05049 arXiv:1506.05049 ]

  38. [46]

    Ilievski , J

    E. Ilievski , J. De Nardis , B. Wouters , J. S. Caux , F. H. L. Essler and T. Prosen , Complete Generalized Gibbs Ensembles in an Interacting Theory , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.157201 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 157201 (2015) , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02993 arX...

  39. [47]

    Ilievski, M

    E. Ilievski, M. Medenjak, T. Prosen and L. Zadnik, Quasilocal charges in integrable lattice systems , J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 064008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2016/06/064008, [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.00440 arXiv:1603.00440 ]

  40. [48]

    Zhang and M

    J. Zhang and M. A. Rajabpour, Subsystem distances between quasiparticle excited states , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)119 JHEP 07 (2022) 119 , [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11448 arXiv:2202.11448 ]

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.