REVIEW 7 cited by
Psyche-R1: Towards Reliable Psychological LLMs through Unified Empathy, Expertise, and Reasoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Psyche-R1: Towards Reliable Psychological LLMs through Unified Empathy, Expertise, and Reasoning
read the original abstract
Amidst a shortage of qualified mental health professionals, the integration of large language models (LLMs) into psychological applications offers a promising way to alleviate the growing burden of mental health disorders. Recent reasoning-augmented LLMs have achieved remarkable performance in mathematics and programming, while research in the psychological domain has predominantly emphasized emotional support and empathetic dialogue, with limited attention to reasoning mechanisms that are beneficial to generating accurate responses. Therefore, in this paper, we propose \logopsyche\textit{Psyche-R1}, the first Chinese psychological LLM that jointly integrates empathy, psychological expertise, and reasoning, built upon a novel data curation pipeline. Specifically, we design a comprehensive data synthesis pipeline that produces over 75k high-quality psychological questions paired with detailed rationales, generated through an iterative prompt-rationale optimization procedure, along with 73k empathetic dialogues. Subsequently, we employ a hybrid training strategy wherein challenging samples are identified through a multi-LLM cross-selection strategy for group relative policy optimization (GRPO) to improve reasoning ability, while the remaining data are used for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to enhance empathetic response generation and psychological domain knowledge. Extensive experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness of \textit{Psyche-R1} across several psychological benchmarks, where our 7B \textit{Psyche-R1} achieves comparable results to 671B \texttt{DeepSeek-R1}.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
IntervenSim: Intervention-Aware Social Network Simulation for Opinion Dynamics
IntervenSim is an intervention-aware social network simulation that couples source interventions with crowd interactions in a feedback loop, improving MAPE by 41.6% and DTW by 66.9% over prior static frameworks on rea...
-
Omni-Perception Policy Optimization for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning
OPPO applies RL with an Omni-Perception Reward and masked-input KL loss to boost cue utilization and suppress hallucinations in emotion reasoning MLLMs, claiming SOTA results on MER-UniBench, MME-Emotion, and MEP-Bench.
-
Omni-Perception Policy Optimization for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning
A cue-coverage reward plus a modality-token KL penalty makes multimodal emotion-reasoning models cite more real visual/audio evidence and hallucinate less, with reported SoTA on emotion benchmarks.
-
Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches
A survey of RLM use in 28 disciplines reveals uneven adoption and introduces a maturity assessment framework showing larger gaps when limited to public resources.
-
Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches
Survey of RLM adoption in 28 disciplines reveals maturity disparities via a new assessment framework, with focus on development, evaluation, and public resources.
-
Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches
A survey of reasoning language model adoption across 28 ERC scientific disciplines finds large maturity gaps, especially when only public resources are counted.
-
CogEvolution: A Human-like Generative Educational Agent to Simulate Student's Cognitive Evolution
CogEvolution combines ICAP cognitive taxonomy, IRT memory retrieval, and evolutionary algorithms into a generative agent that simulates dynamic student cognitive evolution and outperforms baselines in fidelity and lea...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.