Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 300 references

Noisy active matter

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A review proposes that living and engineered active systems use noise, not fight it, to build order.

desk verdict A broad, well-written review on noise as a resource in active matter; the reader's flagged Eq. (8) 'error' is a misread, but the promised quantitative ledger really is unfulfilled for collectives. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16031 v1 pith:YGIFF5J3 submitted 2025-08-22 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-ph

Atanu Chatterjee , Tuhin Chakrabortty , Saad Bhamla This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-ph
keywords activematternoisestochasticthermodynamicsMaxwell'sdemoncollectivebehaviorcriticalitymultiplicativerobophysicalswarms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that noise, traditionally seen as background hiss, is actually a tunable resource that living and engineered active systems exploit to generate structure, function, and collective decision-making. The core claim is that a recurring 'sense-measure-act' loop—where energy is spent to rectify random fluctuations into directed outcomes—operates from single genes and motor proteins up to bird flocks and ant colonies. By connecting stochastic gene expression, molecular motors, collective behavior in animals, and robotic swarms, the paper proposes that the same physics of fluctuation rectification underlies order across scales. The review uses master-equation and Langevin descriptions, along with stochastic thermodynamics, to argue that energy-consuming feedback and multiplicative noise can seed patterns, switch states, and create near-critical sensitivity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 'sense-measure-act' loop, personified as a Maxwell's demon: sense a fluctuation, measure it against stored memory, spend an energetic coin (ATP or a behavioral act), and bias an irreversible transition. The formal machinery is the chemical master equation and its van Kampen/Langevin reduction (Eqs. 1–2 and 7–8), which reveals that multiplicative, state-dependent noise is shared by intracellular gene circuits and mesoscale collective decisions. This machinery is paired with hydrodynamic theories (Toner–Tu flocks, active nematics, motility-induced phase separation) and with stochastic-thermodynamic tools that price the dissipation required for noise rectification.

What would settle it

Simulate the ant-recruitment master equation (7) at several group sizes N and compare the mean switching time between the two trails with the Langevin approximation (8). Because the approximation's noise amplitude uses 1/N where a system-size expansion of Eq. (7) gives 1/√N, the predicted Kramers escape rates will diverge measurably at small N; matching or failing to match provides a concrete test of the universal noise-rectification mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that noise is not an obstacle to biological order but an ingredient: systems that consume energy can measure fluctuations, store information about them, and spend free energy to bias the next step, thereby rectifying randomness into work or collective choice. This 'Maxwell demon' motif is presented as a unifying mechanism across scales. At the molecular level, motors and gene circuits use ATP to filter thermal noise; at the organismal level, individuals use behavioral cues to amplify or dampen intrinsic variability; and at the group level, swarms average errors while exploiting state-dependent noise to flip between collective states. The same mathematical structu

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the sense-measure-act loop, formalized by master-equation and Langevin models like Eqs. (7)–(8), is quantitatively faithful at every scale from gene circuits to ant trails; Eq. (8) states the noise as N^{-1} rather than N^{-1/2}, so if that scaling is wrong the claimed unification loses its quantitative footing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If noise is a tunable resource, then deliberately adding or shaping noise can improve sensitivity and robustness in engineered active systems, not just degrade them.
  • The same master-equation/Langevin mathematics applies from mRNA fluctuations to ant trail selection, making collective-decision theory quantitatively transferable across vastly different physical scales.
  • Energy accounting provides a universal currency: better precision in sensing or decision-making requires more dissipation, so organisms face a measurable trade-off between accuracy and thermodynamic cost.
  • Near-critical operation maximizes information transfer and collective responsiveness, but must be tempered by hysteresis or sub-critical retreat to avoid costly false alarms.
  • Robophysical swarms can serve as programmable testbeds where noise, connectivity, and feedback are dialed, turning qualitative biological scenarios into measurable phase diagrams.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the unification is correct, one might test it by measuring trajectory-level entropy production in robot swarms or ant colonies and checking whether the per-decision cost scales like molecular proofreading (roughly kBT per bit of information), as the demon analogy implies.
  • The review's examples suggest a testable 'noise budget' principle: systems may tune intrinsic noise amplitude—via group size, cue salience, or connectivity—to sit near a critical point; engineered swarms could be driven through the same phase diagram by adding calibrated random perturbations.
  • The claimed universality could be genuinely falsified in systems with long-range hydrodynamic coupling or quenched disorder, where the local master-equation reduction may not hold and different effective dynamics might be required.
  • A cross-species comparison of the noise amplitude in Eqs. (7)–(8) could reveal whether the N^{-1/2} vs N^{-1} scaling discrepancy is a harmless typo or indicates that some real collectives are not in the van Kampen regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a broad review/essay covering noise in active matter from molecular motors and gene circuits to insect swarms, bird flocks, and robot swarms. It argues that noise is not merely background but a tunable resource, and proposes a unifying 'sense–measure–act' thermodynamic ledger across scales, using stochastic thermodynamics to price the cost of noise rectification. The paper contains several pedagogical boxes with model equations (chemical master and Langevin equations, Toner-Tu theory, active nematics, MIPS, Ising analogies, entropy-production inference tools) and draws on many experimental and theoretical examples. It ends with an outlook on extending thermodynamic inference to larger scales and using robophysical swarms as testbeds.

Significance. If the proposed unification were quantitatively established, it would be a valuable synthesis connecting stochastic thermodynamics, active matter, and collective behavior. The review's strengths are its breadth, its accessible presentation of many canonical results, and its explicit attempt to link molecular-scale dissipation accounting to collective decisions. However, as it stands, the central quantitative claim is delivered only at the molecular/organelle scale; collective-scale costs remain metaphorical, and one of the worked model equations contains an error that undermines a named example. With corrections and appropriately tempered claims, the paper could serve as a useful perspective/roadmap for the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [A tale of two trails, Eq. (8)] The drift in Eq. (8), f(x)=αx(1−x)−βx, has an unstable fixed point at x=0 and a single stable fixed point x*=1−β/α (for α>β); it cannot 'create two wells, one per trail.' The subsequent Kramers-barrier discussion and the switching-rate claim are therefore not supported by the displayed equation. The accompanying statement that the noise amplitude g(x)=√((αx(1−x)+βx)/N) 'increases when one branch dominates (x→1)' is also not generally true: for α>2β, g(1/2)>g(1). Please correct the master equation or its interpretation, and verify against the original Biancalani et al. model.
  2. [Introduction, Box 4, Outlook] The Introduction promises that the paper quantifies 'the energetic price life pays for harnessing randomness, using stochastic thermodynamics as the ledger,' but the quantitative tools in Box 4 (TUR, variance sum rule, entropy-production inference) are demonstrated only on molecular/organelle examples such as RNA hairpins, flagella, and red blood cells. For animal collectives and robot swarms, costs are described via the metaphor of 'behavioral coins' with no entropy-production, Landauer, or TUR estimate. The Outlook explicitly states that the challenge is 'to extend such trajectory-level thermodynamic inference from organelles to whole cells and ultimately, to tissues and even populations.' Thus the paper's own text concedes that the cross-scale quantitative ledger is not established. Either soften the claim (e.g., present it as a research agenda) or include at least one worked collecti
minor comments (4)
  1. [Box 4, FDT row] The fluctuation-dissipation relation is written as 'eC(ω)=2k_B T/ω χ''(ω)'; the stray 'e' appears to be a typo and should be removed.
  2. [Box 2, Eq. (5)] The active-stress term in the Stokes equation is written as −ζ∇Q; it should presumably be −ζ∇·Q (or the notation should be defined), since the force balance should involve a divergence of the active stress.
  3. [Box 3, Eq. (11)] The symbol ∓ in the exponent is not defined; please state explicitly which sign corresponds to p→l and which to l→p.
  4. [Introduction/Outlook] The phrase 'behavioral coins' is evocative but undefined. If the thermodynamic-ledger language is retained, a brief operational definition (e.g., metabolic cost per action, or energy per bit of information) would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review synthesizes external published results; the two author self-citations are empirical and not load-bearing reductions, and the central claim is a narrative synthesis rather than a self-derived prediction.

full rationale

This is a review, not a derivation paper. Its central claim—that noise can be a tunable resource across scales—is supported by citation of external models and experiments (e.g., Biancalani et al.'s ant-trail master equation, Eq. (7), and its van Kampen reduction, Eq. (8); Yates et al.'s locust Fokker–Planck escape; Vicsek/Toner–Tu; Jhawar et al.; etc.). No parameter is fitted in this paper and then renamed a prediction: the statement that the ant trail switching rate peaks at intermediate food influx is a cited result from Biancalani et al., not a new output of this review. The author self-citations (ref. 86, Chakrabortty & Bhamla's sheep experiments; ref. 241, Chatterjee et al.'s ant-leader susceptibility experiments) are empirical, externally falsifiable observations and are not used to define the target claim; they serve as supporting examples. The van Kampen noise amplitude in Eq. (8) is the standard N^{-1/2} scaling and is a correct reduction of Eq. (7), not a circular re-injection of the conclusion. The Outlook explicitly concedes that trajectory-level thermodynamic inference has not yet been extended to populations ('The challenge ahead is to extend such trajectory-level thermodynamic inference from organelles to whole cells and ultimately, to tissues and even populations'), which limits the strength of the 'unified ledger' claim but is a scope limitation, not circularity. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or definitional equivalence is imported from the authors' prior work to force the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters or entities. Its synthesis rests on standard model assumptions borrowed from the literature, several of which are deployed without qualification. The van Kampen prefactor error in Eq. (8) weakens the claim of rigorous quantitative grounding. The 'demon' and 'orchestrator' are interpretive metaphors, not new physical entities.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Chemical master equation with mass-action kinetics is an exact mesoscopic description
    Used to model gene expression (Eq. 1) and ant trail selection (Eq. 7).
  • standard math Van Kampen system-size expansion yields a Gaussian white-noise Langevin equation
    Used to derive Eqs. (2) and (8); the expansion assumes a large population size and continuous state, and its prefactor is misstated in Eq. (8).
  • standard math Kramers theory converts barrier heights into switching rates
    Applied to biochemical switches and collective decisions, e.g., Eq. (10) in Box 3.
  • domain assumption Mean-field load-sharing assumption in motor tug-of-war
    Box 3, Eq. (9): the cargo velocity depends only on the net number of engaged motors, which is a simplification of the true stochastic load distribution.
  • domain assumption Biological groups discussed operate near criticality
    The review heavily relies on criticality claims for starling flocks, fish schools, and other systems, which are supported by some experiments but remain debated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Noisy active matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YGIFF5J3

@misc{pith2026250816031,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Noisy active matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YGIFF5J3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16031}
}
read the original abstract

Noise threads every scale of the natural world. Once dismissed as mere background hiss, it is now recognized as both a currency of information and a source of order in systems driven far from equilibrium. From nanometer-scale motor proteins to meter-scale bird flocks, active collectives harness noise to break symmetry, explore decision landscapes, and poise themselves at the cusp where sensitivity and robustness coexist. We review the physics that underpins this paradox: how energy-consuming feedback rectifies stochastic fluctuations, how multiplicative noise seeds patterns and state transitions, and how living ensembles average the residual errors. Bridging single-molecule calorimetry, critical flocking, and robophysical swarms, we propose a unified view in which noise is not background blur but a tunable resource for adaptation and emergent order in biology and engineered active matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.16031 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Order from noise. A) A demon gas generates patterns by harnessing thermal noise as an energy source83; B) Massive starling flocks murmurate to evade predators, converting noise into large-scale coordinated motion84; C) Fireflies synchronize their flashes by using the fluctuating signals of nearby individuals as cues85; D) Small groups of sheep align in response to external noise, such as a scare from a shepherd dog8… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Inferring behavior through mechanical and sensory inputs. A) Real fish synchronize their swimming with a robotic fish to reduce energetic cost (picture credits: Couzin lab); B) A locust in a virtual reality arena learns to align its motion with projected neighbors (picture credits: Couzin lab); C) A honeybee swarm subjected to mechanical perturbations adapts its shape dynamically through structural morphogenesis85; … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Cooperative transport and the Ising model. A molecular scale tug-of-war emerges when kinesin and dynein motors transport a vesicle along a microtubule (left). A similar tug-of-war arises at the organismal scale as longhorn ants cooperatively haul a dead insect in the wild (right). Ant illustration adapted from The Anteater’s Culinary Guide by Ofer Feinerman and Ehud Fonio, artwork by Sarit Bernard. The binary decisi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Molecular inference through thermal noise and energy dissipation. A) Force-extension curves of an RNA hairpin reveal the stochasticity of unfolding and refolding trajectories, with work dissipated or recovered (blue area) as the molecule transitions between states327; …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The life of the bee (Dodd, Mead, 1901)

    Maeterlinck, M. The life of the bee (Dodd, Mead, 1901)

    1901

  2. [2]

    & Wilke, C

    Allan Drummond, D. & Wilke, C. O. The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 715–724 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    & Reluga, T

    Qian, H. & Reluga, T. C. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and nonlinear kinetics in a cellular signaling switch. Phys. review letters 94, 028101 (2005)

    2005

  4. [4]

    Alberts, B. et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell (Garland Science, 2002)

    2002

  5. [5]

    What is life?: With mind and matter and autobiographical sketches (Cambridge university press, 1992)

    Schrödinger, E. What is life?: With mind and matter and autobiographical sketches (Cambridge university press, 1992)

    1992

  6. [6]

    Tsimring, L. S. Noise in biology. Reports on Prog. Phys. 77, 026601 (2014)

    2014

  7. [7]

    Transforming noise: a history of its science and technology from disturbing sounds to informational errors, 1900-1955 (Oxford University Press, 2023)

    Yeang, C.-P. Transforming noise: a history of its science and technology from disturbing sounds to informational errors, 1900-1955 (Oxford University Press, 2023)

    1900

  8. [8]

    Musson, A. E. & Robinson, E. Science and technology in the industrial revolution, vol. 3 (Taylor & Francis, 1989)

    1989

Show all 300 references
  1. [9]

    Fourier, J. B. J. Théorie analytique de la chaleur, vol. 1 (Gauthier-Villars, 1888)

  2. [10]

    Doppler, C. Ueber das farbige Licht der Doppelsterne und einiger anderer Gestirne des Himmels: Versuch einer das Bradley’sche Aberrations-Theorem als integrirenden Theil in sich schliessenden allgemeineren Theorie(K. Böhm Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 1903)

    1903

  3. [11]

    Ueber die bewegung der elektricität in drähten

    Kirchhoff, G. Ueber die bewegung der elektricität in drähten. Annalen der Physik 176, 193–217 (1857)

  4. [12]

    Bell, A. G. The Bell Telephone: The Deposition of Alexander Graham Bell, in the Suit Brought by the United States to Annul the Bell Patents (American Bell Telephone Company, 1908)

    1908

  5. [13]

    Edison, T. A. The perfected phonograph. The North Am. Rev. 146, 641–650 (1888)

  6. [14]

    Brown, R. Xxvii. a brief account of microscopical observations made in the months of june, july and august 1827, on the particles contained in the pollen of plants; and on the general existence of active molecules in organic and inorganic bodies. The philosophical magazine 4, ...

  7. [15]

    Einstein, A. et al. On the motion of small particles suspended in liquids at rest required by the molecular-kinetic theory of heat. Annalen der physik 17, 208 (1905)

    1905

  8. [16]

    & im unbegrenzten Raum, I

    Smoluchowski, V . & im unbegrenzten Raum, I. D. Zusammenfassende bearbeitungen.Ann. Phys 21, 756 (1906)

    1906

  9. [17]

    Gibbs, J. W. Elementary principles in statistical mechanics: developed with especial reference to the rational foundations of thermodynamics (C. Scribner’s sons, 1902)

    1902

  10. [18]

    on the relationship between the second fundamental theorem of the mechanical theory of heat and probability calculations regarding the conditions for thermal equilibrium

    Sharp, K. & Matschinsky, F. Translation of ludwig boltzmann’s paper “on the relationship between the second fundamental theorem of the mechanical theory of heat and probability calculations regarding the conditions for thermal equilibrium” sitzungberichte der kaiserlichen akad...

  11. [19]

    Mouvement brownien et molécules

    Perrin, J. Mouvement brownien et molécules. J. Phys. Theor. Appl.9, 5–39 (1910)

    1910

  12. [20]

    Die brownsche grenze für beobachtungsreihen

    Zernike, F. Die brownsche grenze für beobachtungsreihen. Zeitschrift für Physik 79, 516–528 (1932)

    1932

  13. [21]

    Johnson, J. B. Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors. Phys. review 32, 97 (1928)

    1928

  14. [22]

    Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors

    Nyquist, H. Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors. Phys. review 32, 110 (1928)

    1928

  15. [23]

    The early history of thermal noise: The long way to paradigm change

    Dörfel, G. The early history of thermal noise: The long way to paradigm change. Annalen der Physik 524, 117–121 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communications. Bell system technical journal 27, 379–423 (1948)

    1948

  17. [25]

    Über die entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen system bei eingriffen intelligenter wesen

    Szilard, L. Über die entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen system bei eingriffen intelligenter wesen. Zeitschrift für Physik 53, 840–856 (1929)

    1929

  18. [26]

    Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process

    Landauer, R. Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM journal research development 5, 183–191 (1961). 16/29

    1961

  19. [27]

    Information is physical

    Landauer, R. Information is physical. Phys. Today 44, 23–29 (1991)

    1991

  20. [28]

    Bennett, C. H. Demons, engines and the second law. Sci. Am. 257, 108–117 (1987)

    1987

  21. [29]

    Thermodynamics of irreversible processes (Thomas, 1955)

    Prigogine, I. Thermodynamics of irreversible processes (Thomas, 1955)

    1955

  22. [30]

    & Nicolis, G

    Prigogine, I. & Nicolis, G. On symmetry-breaking instabilities in dissipative systems. The J. Chem. Phys. 46, 3542–3550 (1967)

    1967

  23. [31]

    Time, structure, and fluctuations

    Prigogine, I. Time, structure, and fluctuations. Science 201, 777–785 (1978)

    1978

  24. [32]

    Kondepudi, D. K. & Prigogine, I. Sensitivity of nonequilibrium systems. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. its Appl. 107, 1–24 (1981)

    1981

  25. [33]

    Wood, P. M. & Ross, J. A quantitative study of chemical waves in the belousov–zhabotinsky reaction.The J. chemical physics 82, 1924–1936 (1985)

    1924

  26. [34]

    & Wiesenfeld, K

    Bak, P., Tang, C. & Wiesenfeld, K. Self-organized criticality: An explanation of the 1/f noise. Phys. review letters 59, 381 (1987)

    1987

  27. [35]

    Beggs, J. M. & Plenz, D. Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. J. neuroscience 23, 11167–11177 (2003)

    2003

  28. [36]

    & Scanlon, T

    Bak, P., Christensen, K., Danon, L. & Scanlon, T. Unified scaling law for earthquakes.Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 178501 (2002)

    2002

  29. [37]

    Black, F. Noise. The journal finance 41, 528–543 (1986)

    1986

  30. [38]

    Gopikrishnan, P., Plerou, V ., Amaral, L. A. N., Meyer, M. & Stanley, H. E. Scaling of the distribution of fluctuations of financial market indices. Phys. Rev. E 60, 5305 (1999)

    1999

  31. [39]

    B., Levine, A

    Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D. & Swain, P. S. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297, 1183–1186 (2002)

    2002

  32. [40]

    C., Blake, W

    Kaern, M., Elston, T. C., Blake, W. J. & Collins, J. J. Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 451–464 (2005)

    2005

  33. [41]

    & Reece, S

    Viney, M. & Reece, S. E. Adaptive noise. Proc. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 280, 20131104 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    Coulon, A. et al. Kinetic competition during the transcription cycle results in stochastic rna processing. Elife 3, e03939 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    & Weiner, M

    Novick, A. & Weiner, M. Enzyme induction as an all-or-none phenomenon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 43, 553–566 (1957)

    1957

  36. [44]

    & van Oudenaarden, A

    Thattai, M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 8614–8619 (2001)

    2001

  37. [45]

    & Goldenfeld, N

    Assaf, M., Roberts, E., Luthey-Schulten, Z. & Goldenfeld, N. Extrinsic noise driven phenotype switching in a self- regulating gene. Phys. review letters 111, 058102 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Kussell, E., Kishony, R., Balaban, N. Q. & Leibler, S. Bacterial persistence: a model of survival in changing environments. Genetics 169, 1807–1814 (2005)

    2005

  39. [47]

    & Leibler, S

    Kussell, E. & Leibler, S. Phenotypic diversity, population growth, and information in fluctuating environments. Science 309, 2075–2078 (2005)

  40. [48]

    & Leibler, S

    Xue, B. & Leibler, S. Bet hedging against demographic fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 108103 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Treatment of staphylococcal infections with penicillin by intermittent sterilisation

    Bigger, J. Treatment of staphylococcal infections with penicillin by intermittent sterilisation. The Lancet 244, 497–500 (1944)

    1944

  42. [50]

    Balaban, N. Q. et al. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 441–448 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Manuse, S. et al. Bacterial persisters are a stochastically formed subpopulation of low-energy cells. PLoS biology 19, e3001194 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Gillespie, D. T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. The journal physical chemistry 81, 2340–2361 (1977)

    1977

  45. [53]

    Wilkinson, D. J. Stochastic modelling for systems biology (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    Waters, C. M. & Bassler, B. L. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.21, 319–346 (2005)

    2005

  47. [55]

    Bassler, B. L. & Losick, R. Bacterially speaking. Cell 125, 237–246 (2006)

    2006

  48. [56]

    Miller, M. B. & Bassler, B. L. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55, 165–199 (2001). 17/29

    2001

  49. [57]

    & Bassler, B

    Camilli, A. & Bassler, B. L. Bacterial small-molecule signaling pathways. Science 311, 1113–1116 (2006)

    2006

  50. [58]

    Hense, B. A. et al. Does efficiency sensing unify diffusion and quorum sensing? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 230–239 (2007)

    2007

  51. [59]

    & Losick, R

    Dubnau, D. & Losick, R. Bistability in bacteria. Mol. microbiology 61, 564–572 (2006)

    2006

  52. [60]

    M., Thattai, M., Lim, H

    Ozbudak, E. M., Thattai, M., Lim, H. N., Shraiman, B. I. & Van Oudenaarden, A. Multistability in the lactose utilization network of escherichia coli. Nature 427, 737–740 (2004)

    2004

  53. [61]

    Santillán, M., Mackey, M. C. & Zeron, E. S. Origin of bistability in the lac operon. Biophys. journal 92, 3830–3842 (2007)

    2007

  54. [62]

    & Van Oudenaarden, A

    Acar, M., Becskei, A. & Van Oudenaarden, A. Enhancement of cellular memory by reducing stochastic transitions. Nature 435, 228–232 (2005)

    2005

  55. [63]

    Pomerening, J. R. Uncovering mechanisms of bistability in biological systems. Curr. opinion biotechnology 19, 381–388 (2008)

    2008

  56. [64]

    MacArthur, B. D. et al. Nanog-dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity. Nat. cell biology 14, 1139–1147 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise

    Huang, S. Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise. Development 136, 3853–3862 (2009)

    2009

  58. [66]

    Stochastic methods, vol

    Gardiner, C. Stochastic methods, vol. 4 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)

    2009

  59. [67]

    & Borkovec, M

    Hänggi, P., Talkner, P. & Borkovec, M. Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after kramers. Rev. modern physics 62, 251 (1990)

    1990

  60. [68]

    & Van Oudenaarden, A

    Munsky, B., Neuert, G. & Van Oudenaarden, A. Using gene expression noise to understand gene regulation. Science 336, 183–187 (2012)

    2012

  61. [69]

    Altschuler, S. J. & Wu, L. F. Cellular heterogeneity: do differences make a difference? Cell 141, 559–563 (2010)

    2010

  62. [70]

    R., Zenklusen, D., Wu, B., Chao, J

    Larson, D. R., Zenklusen, D., Wu, B., Chao, J. A. & Singer, R. H. Real-time observation of transcription initiation and elongation on an endogenous yeast gene. science 332, 475–478 (2011)

    2011

  63. [71]

    & Kondev, J

    Sanchez, A., Choubey, S. & Kondev, J. Regulation of noise in gene expression. Annu. review biophysics 42, 469–491 (2013)

    2013

  64. [72]

    Senecal, A. et al. Transcription factors modulate c-fos transcriptional bursts. Cell reports 8, 75–83 (2014)

    2014

  65. [73]

    & Naef, F

    Zoller, B., Nicolas, D., Molina, N. & Naef, F. Structure of silent transcription intervals and noise characteristics of mammalian genes. Mol. systems biology 11, 823 (2015)

    2015

  66. [74]

    & Zhuang, X

    Wang, C., Han, B., Zhou, R. & Zhuang, X. Real-time imaging of translation on single mrna transcripts in live cells. Cell 165, 990–1001 (2016)

    2016

  67. [75]

    & Whitney, R

    Sánchez, R., Splettstoesser, J. & Whitney, R. S. Nonequilibrium system as a demon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 216801 (2019)

    2019

  68. [76]

    & Larson, D

    Rodriguez, J. & Larson, D. R. Transcription in living cells: molecular mechanisms of bursting. Annu. review biochemistry 89, 189–212 (2020)

    2020

  69. [77]

    & Tkaˇcik, G

    Zoller, B., Gregor, T. & Tkaˇcik, G. Eukaryotic gene regulation at equilibrium, or non? Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 31, 100435 (2022)

    2022

  70. [78]

    & Leibler, S

    Rao, R. & Leibler, S. Evolutionary dynamics, evolutionary forces, and robustness: A nonequilibrium statistical mechanics perspective. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2112083119 (2022)

    2022

  71. [79]

    Ravasio, R. et al. A minimal scenario for the origin of non-equilibrium order. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10911 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  72. [80]

    & Libchaber, A

    Tlusty, T. & Libchaber, A. Life sets off a cascade of machines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 122, e2418000122 (2025)

    2025

  73. [81]

    & Rajewsky, N

    Nitzan, M., Karaiskos, N., Friedman, N. & Rajewsky, N. Gene expression cartography. Nature 576, 132–137 (2019)

    2019

  74. [82]

    The Demon in the machine: How hidden webs of information are solving the mystery of life (University of Chicago Press, 2019)

    Davies, P. The Demon in the machine: How hidden webs of information are solving the mystery of life (University of Chicago Press, 2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    & Vitelli, V

    VanSaders, B. & Vitelli, V . Informational active matter.Res. Sq. (2023)

    2023

  76. [84]

    King, A. J. & Sumpter, D. J. Murmurations. Curr. Biol. 22, R112–R114 (2012)

    2012

  77. [85]

    M., Salcedo, M

    Peleg, O., Peters, J. M., Salcedo, M. K. & Mahadevan, L. Collective mechanical adaptation of honeybee swarms. Nat. Phys. 14, 1193–1198 (2018)

    2018

  78. [86]

    & Bhamla, S

    Chakrabortty, T. & Bhamla, S. Controlling noisy herds. ArXiv arXiv–2406 (2025). 18/29

    2025

  79. [87]

    J., Culver, J., Bhamla, M

    Mathijssen, A. J., Culver, J., Bhamla, M. S. & Prakash, M. Collective intercellular communication through ultra-fast hydrodynamic trigger waves. Nature 571, 560–564 (2019)

    2019

  80. [88]

    Berg, H. C. & Purcell, E. M. Physics of chemoreception. Biophys. journal 20, 193–219 (1977)

    1977

  81. [89]

    Endres, R. G. & Wingreen, N. S. Maximum likelihood and the single receptor. Phys. review letters 103, 158101 (2009)

    2009

  82. [90]

    & Schwab, D

    Mehta, P. & Schwab, D. J. Energetic costs of cellular computation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 17978–17982 (2012)

    2012

  83. [91]

    Kaizu, K. et al. The berg-purcell limit revisited. Biophys. journal 106, 976–985 (2014)

    2014

  84. [92]

    Aquino, G., Wingreen, N. S. & Endres, R. G. Know the single-receptor sensing limit? think again. J. statistical physics 162, 1353–1364 (2016)

    2016

  85. [93]

    & Wingreen, N

    Mora, T. & Wingreen, N. S. Limits of sensing temporal concentration changes by single cells. Phys. review letters 104, 248101 (2010)

    2010

  86. [94]

    Govern, C. C. & ten Wolde, P. R. Energy dissipation and noise correlations in biochemical sensing. Phys. review letters 113, 258102 (2014)

    2014

  87. [95]

    L., Wadhams, G

    Porter, S. L., Wadhams, G. H. & Armitage, J. P. Signal processing in complex chemotaxis pathways. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 153–165 (2011)

    2011

  88. [96]

    & Sourjik, V

    Vladimirov, N. & Sourjik, V . Chemotaxis: how bacteria use memory. (2009)

    2009

  89. [97]

    Hathcock, D. et al. A nonequilibrium allosteric model for receptor-kinase complexes: The role of energy dissipation in chemotaxis signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2303115120 (2023)

    2023

  90. [98]

    & Sagawa, T

    Ito, S. & Sagawa, T. Maxwell’s demon in biochemical signal transduction with feedback loop. Nat. Commun. 6, 7498 (2015)

    2015

  91. [99]

    The nonequilibrium mechanism for ultrasensitivity in a biological switch: sensing by maxwell’s demons.Proc

    Tu, Y . The nonequilibrium mechanism for ultrasensitivity in a biological switch: sensing by maxwell’s demons.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 11737–11741 (2008)

    2008

  92. [100]

    Hopfield, J. J. Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 71, 4135–4139 (1974)

    1974

  93. [101]

    Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination

    Ninio, J. Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination. Biochimie 57, 587–595 (1975)

    1975

  94. [102]

    Murugan, A., Huse, D. A. & Leibler, S. Speed, dissipation, and error in kinetic proofreading. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 12034–12039 (2012)

    2012

  95. [103]

    Murugan, A., Huse, D. A. & Leibler, S. Discriminatory proofreading regimes in nonequilibrium systems. Phys. Rev. X. 4 (2014)

    2014

  96. [104]

    McKeithan, T. W. Kinetic proofreading in t-cell receptor signal transduction. Proc. national academy sciences 92, 5042–5046 (1995)

    1995

  97. [105]

    Feinerman, O., Germain, R. N. & Altan-Bonnet, G. Quantitative challenges in understanding ligand discrimination by αβ t cells. Mol. immunology 45, 619–631 (2008)

    2008

  98. [106]

    & Mehta, P

    Cui, W. & Mehta, P. Identifying feasible operating regimes for early t-cell recognition: The speed, energy, accuracy trade-off in kinetic proofreading and adaptive sorting. PloS one 13, e0202331 (2018)

    2018

  99. [107]

    & Danchin, A

    Boël, G., Danot, O., De Lorenzo, V . & Danchin, A. Omnipresent maxwell’s demons orchestrate information management in living cells. Microb. Biotechnol. 12, 210–242 (2019)

    2019

  100. [108]

    Kunkel, T. A. Dna replication fidelity. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 16895–16898 (2004)

    2004

  101. [109]

    Connections between translation, transcription and replication error-rates

    Ninio, J. Connections between translation, transcription and replication error-rates. Biochimie 73, 1517–1523 (1991)

    1991

  102. [110]

    Kinetic proofreading

    Boeger, H. Kinetic proofreading. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 91, 423–447 (2022)

    2022

  103. [111]

    A., Trudeau, R

    Leyes Porello, E. A., Trudeau, R. T. & Lim, B. Transcriptional bursting: stochasticity in deterministic development. Development 150, dev201546 (2023)

    2023

  104. [112]

    Acar, M., Mettetal, J. T. & van Oudenaarden, A. Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments. Nat. Genet. 40, 471–475 (2008)

    2008

  105. [113]

    & Dhar, R

    Pal, S. & Dhar, R. Living in a noisy world—origins of gene expression noise and its impact on cellular decision-making. FEBS letters (2024)

    2024

  106. [114]

    Astumian, R. D. & Bier, M. Fluctuation driven ratchets: molecular motors. Phys. review letters 72, 1766 (1994). 19/29

    1994

  107. [115]

    & Prost, J

    Jülicher, F., Ajdari, A. & Prost, J. Modeling molecular motors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 1269 (1997)

    1997

  108. [116]

    Purcell, E. M. Life at low reynolds number. Am. J. Phys. 45, 3–11, DOI: 10.1119/1.10903 (1977). https://pubs.aip.org/ aapt/ajp/article-pdf/45/1/3/11809839/3_1_online.pdf

    1977 doi

  109. [117]

    Guo, M. et al. Probing the stochastic, motor-driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy. Cell 158, 822–832 (2014)

    2014

  110. [118]

    W., Lenz, M

    Murrell, M., Oakes, P. W., Lenz, M. & Gardel, M. L. Forcing cells into shape: the mechanics of actomyosin contractility. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 486–498 (2015)

    2015

  111. [119]

    Vale, R. D. & Hotani, H. Formation of membrane networks in vitro by kinesin-driven microtubule movement. The J. cell biology 107, 2233–2241 (1988)

    1988

  112. [120]

    Rice, S. et al. A structural change in the kinesin motor protein that drives motility. Nature 402, 778–784 (1999)

    1999

  113. [121]

    Vale, R. D. & Milligan, R. A. The way things move: looking under the hood of molecular motor proteins. Science 288, 88–95 (2000)

    2000

  114. [122]

    Vale, R. D. The molecular motor toolbox for intracellular transport. Cell 112, 467–480 (2003)

    2003

  115. [123]

    Molecular motors: structural adaptations to cellular functions

    Howard, J. Molecular motors: structural adaptations to cellular functions. Nature 389, 561–567 (1997)

    1997

  116. [124]

    Mechanics of motor proteins

    Howard, J. Mechanics of motor proteins. In Physics of bio-molecules and cells. Physique des biomolécules et des cellules: session LXXV . 2–27 July 2001, 69–94 (Springer, 2002)

    2001

  117. [125]

    & Block, S

    Svoboda, K. & Block, S. M. Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules. Cell 77, 773–784 (1994)

    1994

  118. [126]

    Experimentell nachweisbare, der üblichen thermodynamik widersprechende molekularphänomene

    Smoluchowski, M. Experimentell nachweisbare, der üblichen thermodynamik widersprechende molekularphänomene. Pisma Mariana Smoluchowskiego 2, 226–251 (1927)

    1927

  119. [127]

    P., Leighton, R

    Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B. & Sands, M. The Feynman lectures on physics, Vol. I, vol. 1 (Basic books, 2015)

    2015

  120. [128]

    & Seifert, U

    Schmiedl, T. & Seifert, U. Efficiency of molecular motors at maximum power. Europhys. Lett. 83, 30005 (2008)

    2008

  121. [129]

    & Hyeon, C

    Hwang, W. & Hyeon, C. Energetic costs, precision, and transport efficiency of molecular motors. The journal physical chemistry letters 9, 513–520 (2018)

    2018

  122. [130]

    & Oiwa, K

    Sakakibara, H. & Oiwa, K. Molecular organization and force-generating mechanism of dynein. The FEBS journal 278, 2964–2979 (2011)

    2011

  123. [131]

    Niitani, Y ., Matsuzaki, K., Jonsson, E., Vale, R. D. & Tomishige, M. Kinetic regulation of kinesin’s two motor domains coordinates its stepping along microtubules. eLife 14, RP106228 (2025)

    2025

  124. [132]

    Nie, Q.-M. et al. Coupling of lever arm swing and biased brownian motion in actomyosin. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003552 (2014)

    2014

  125. [133]

    Block, S. M. Kinesin motor mechanics: binding, stepping, tracking, gating, and limping. Biophys. journal 92, 2986–2995 (2007)

    2007

  126. [134]

    Kolomeisky, A. B. & Fisher, M. E. Molecular motors: a theorist’s perspective. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58, 675–695 (2007)

    2007

  127. [135]

    Kolomeisky, A. B. Motor proteins and molecular motors (CRC press, 2015)

    2015

  128. [136]

    Visscher, K., Schnitzer, M. J. & Block, S. M. Single kinesin molecules studied with a molecular force clamp. Nature 400, 184–189 (1999)

    1999

  129. [137]

    Carter, N. J. & Cross, R. Mechanics of the kinesin step. Nature 435, 308–312 (2005)

    2005

  130. [138]

    & Ajdari, A

    Prost, J., Chauwin, J.-F., Peliti, L. & Ajdari, A. Asymmetric pumping of particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2652 (1994)

    1994

  131. [139]

    Magnasco, M. O. Forced thermal ratchets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1477 (1993)

    1993

  132. [140]

    Berna, J. et al. Macroscopic transport by synthetic molecular machines. Nat. materials 4, 704–710 (2005)

    2005

  133. [141]

    Bruns, C. J. & Stoddart, J. F. Rotaxane-based molecular muscles. Accounts chemical research 47, 2186–2199 (2014)

    2014

  134. [142]

    Amano, S. et al. Insights from an information thermodynamics analysis of a synthetic molecular motor. Nat. Chem. 14, 530–537 (2022)

    2022

  135. [143]

    M., Zamuner, S

    Flatt, S., Busiello, D. M., Zamuner, S. & De Los Rios, P. Abc transporters are billion-year-old maxwell demons.Commun. Phys. 6, 205 (2023). 20/29

    2023

  136. [144]

    & Pak, H

    Paneru, G., Dutta, S. & Pak, H. K. Colossal power extraction from active cyclic brownian information engines. The J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 6912–6918 (2022)

    2022

  137. [145]

    & Shochet, O

    Vicsek, T., Czirók, A., Ben-Jacob, E., Cohen, I. & Shochet, O. Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Phys. review letters 75, 1226 (1995)

    1995

  138. [146]

    Toner, J. & Tu, Y . Long-range order in a two-dimensional dynamical xy model: how birds fly together. Phys. review letters 75, 4326 (1995)

    1995

  139. [147]

    Cavagna, A. et al. Flocking and turning: a new model for self-organized collective motion. J. Stat. Phys. 158, 601–627 (2015)

    2015

  140. [148]

    P., Golestanian, R

    Thampi, S. P., Golestanian, R. & Yeomans, J. M. Instabilities and topological defects in active nematics. Europhys. Lett. 105, 18001 (2014)

    2014

  141. [149]

    & Marchetti, M

    Shankar, S. & Marchetti, M. C. Hydrodynamics of active defects: From order to chaos to defect ordering. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041047 (2019)

    2019

  142. [150]

    Cates, M. E. & Tailleur, J. Motility-induced phase separation. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 219–244 (2015)

    2015

  143. [151]

    & Lipowsky, R

    Klumpp, S. & Lipowsky, R. Cooperative cargo transport by several molecular motors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 17284–17289 (2005)

    2005

  144. [152]

    Reck-Peterson, S. L. et al. Single-molecule analysis of dynein processivity and stepping behavior. Cell 126, 335–348 (2006)

    2006

  145. [153]

    J., Klumpp, S

    Müller, M. J., Klumpp, S. & Lipowsky, R. Tug-of-war as a cooperative mechanism for bidirectional cargo transport by molecular motors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 4609–4614 (2008)

    2008

  146. [154]

    K., Barak, P., Rai, A

    Mallik, R., Rai, A. K., Barak, P., Rai, A. & Kunwar, A. Teamwork in microtubule motors. Trends cell biology 23, 575–582 (2013)

    2013

  147. [155]

    L., Kasza, K

    Gardel, M. L., Kasza, K. E., Brangwynne, C. P., Liu, J. & Weitz, D. A. Mechanical response of cytoskeletal networks. Methods cell biology 89, 487–519 (2008)

    2008

  148. [156]

    & Karsenti, E

    Surrey, T., Nédélec, F., Leibler, S. & Karsenti, E. Physical properties determining self-organization of motors and microtubules. Science 292, 1167–1171 (2001)

    2001

  149. [157]

    & Maggs, A

    Nédélec, F., Surrey, T. & Maggs, A. Dynamic concentration of motors in microtubule arrays. Phys. review letters 86, 3192 (2001)

    2001

  150. [158]

    Computer simulations reveal motor properties generating stable antiparallel microtubule interactions

    Nédélec, F. Computer simulations reveal motor properties generating stable antiparallel microtubule interactions. J. Cell Biol. 158, 1005–1015 (2002)

    2002

  151. [159]

    & Ramaswamy, S

    Aditi Simha, R. & Ramaswamy, S. Hydrodynamic fluctuations and instabilities in ordered suspensions of self-propelled particles. Phys. review letters 89, 058101 (2002)

    2002

  152. [160]

    T., DeCamp, S

    Sanchez, T., Chen, D. T., DeCamp, S. J., Heymann, M. & Dogic, Z. Spontaneous motion in hierarchically assembled active matter. Nature 491, 431–434 (2012)

    2012

  153. [161]

    P., Golestanian, R

    Thampi, S. P., Golestanian, R. & Yeomans, J. M. Velocity correlations in an active nematic. Phys. review letters 111, 118101 (2013)

    2013

  154. [162]

    J., Ma, X

    Giomi, L., Bowick, M. J., Ma, X. & Marchetti, M. C. Defect annihilation and proliferation in active nematics. Phys. review letters 110, 228101 (2013)

    2013

  155. [163]

    Sun, Z. G. et al. Feedback between f-actin organization and active stress governs criticality and energy localization in the cell cytoskeleton. Nat. Phys. 1–13 (2025)

    2025

  156. [164]

    Doostmohammadi, A., Ignés-Mullol, J., Yeomans, J. M. & Sagués, F. Active nematics. Nat. Commun. 9, 3246 (2018)

    2018

  157. [165]

    Lindemann, C. B. & Lesich, K. A. Flagellar and ciliary beating: the proven and the possible. J. cell science 123, 519–528 (2010)

    2010

  158. [166]

    H., Hilfinger, A., Howard, J

    Riedel-Kruse, I. H., Hilfinger, A., Howard, J. & Jülicher, F. How molecular motors shape the flagellar beat. HFSP journal 1, 192–208 (2007)

    2007

  159. [167]

    Blake, J. R. A note on the image system for a stokeslet in a no-slip boundary. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 70, 303–310 (Cambridge University Press, 1971)

    1971

  160. [168]

    R., Polin, M., Pedley, T

    Brumley, D. R., Polin, M., Pedley, T. J. & Goldstein, R. E. Hydrodynamic synchronization and metachronal waves<? format?> on the surface of the colonial alga volvox carteri. Phys. review letters 109, 268102 (2012). 21/29

    2012

  161. [169]

    & Lenz, P

    Niedermayer, T., Eckhardt, B. & Lenz, P. Synchronization, phase locking, and metachronal wave formation in ciliary chains. Chaos: An Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 18 (2008)

    2008

  162. [170]

    & Joanny, J.-F

    Guirao, B. & Joanny, J.-F. Spontaneous creation of macroscopic flow and metachronal waves in an array of cilia. Biophys. journal 92, 1900–1917 (2007)

    1900

  163. [171]

    Brumley, D. R. et al. Long-range interactions, wobbles, and phase defects in chains of model cilia. Phys. review fluids 1, 081201 (2016)

    2016

  164. [172]

    & Cicuta, P

    Bruot, N. & Cicuta, P. Realizing the physics of motile cilia synchronization with driven colloids. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 7, 323–348 (2016)

    2016

  165. [173]

    J., Brumley, D

    Pedley, T. J., Brumley, D. R. & Goldstein, R. E. Squirmers with swirl: a model for volvox swimming. J. fluid mechanics 798, 165–186 (2016)

    2016

  166. [174]

    & Chowdhury, D

    Nishinari, K., Okada, Y ., Schadschneider, A. & Chowdhury, D. Intracellular transport of single-headed molecular motors kif1a. Phys. review letters 95, 118101 (2005)

    2005

  167. [175]

    J., Farmer, V

    Arpa˘g, G., Lawrence, E. J., Farmer, V . J., Hall, S. L. & Zanic, M. Collective effects of xmap215, eb1, clasp2, and mcak lead to robust microtubule treadmilling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 12847–12855 (2020)

    2020

  168. [176]

    Angelini, T. E. et al. Glass-like dynamics of collective cell migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 4714–4719 (2011)

    2011

  169. [177]

    & Jacobson, K

    Trepat, X., Chen, Z. & Jacobson, K. Cell migration. Compr. Physiol. 2, 2369 (2012)

    2012

  170. [178]

    Bi, D., Lopez, J., Schwarz, J. M. & Manning, M. L. A density-independent rigidity transition in biological tissues. Nat. Phys. 11, 1074–1079 (2015)

    2015

  171. [179]

    P., Tompa, P

    Brangwynne, C. P., Tompa, P. & Pappu, R. V . Polymer physics of intracellular phase transitions.Nat. Phys. 11, 899–904 (2015)

    2015

  172. [180]

    F., Lee, H

    Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. & Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. reviews Mol. cell biology 18, 285–298 (2017)

    2017

  173. [181]

    & Helbing, D

    Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F. & Helbing, D. How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proc. national academy sciences 108, 9020–9025 (2011)

    2011

  174. [182]

    From noise to knowledge: how randomness generates novel phenomena and reveals information

    Boettiger, C. From noise to knowledge: how randomness generates novel phenomena and reveals information. Ecol. letters 21, 1255–1267 (2018)

    2018

  175. [183]

    & Lefever, R

    Horsthemke, W. & Lefever, R. Noise-induced transitions in physics, chemistry, and biology (Springer, 1984)

    1984

  176. [184]

    & Guttal, V

    Jhawar, J. & Guttal, V . Noise-induced effects in collective dynamics and inferring local interactions from data.Philos. transactions royal society b 375, 20190381 (2020)

    2020

  177. [185]

    Ellis, P. E. The gregarious behaviour of marching locusta migratoria migratorioides (r. & f.) hoppers. J. Exp. Biol. 30, 214–234 (1953)

    1953

  178. [186]

    & Tsuda, I

    Matsumoto, K. & Tsuda, I. Noise-induced order. J. Stat. Phys. 31, 87–106 (1983)

    1983

  179. [187]

    & Franks, N

    Deneubourg, J.-L. & Franks, N. R. Collective control without explicit coding: the case of communal nest excavation. J. insect behavior 8, 417–432 (1995)

    1995

  180. [188]

    Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems

    Bonabeau, E. Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems. Oxf. Univ. Press. google schola 2, 25–34 (1999)

    1999

  181. [189]

    & Bartolo, D

    Gu, F., Guiselin, B., Bain, N., Zuriguel, I. & Bartolo, D. Emergence of collective oscillations in massive human crowds. Nature 638, 112–119 (2025)

    2025

  182. [190]

    The locust crisis: The world bank’s response. . (2020)

    2020

  183. [191]

    Buhl, J. et al. From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science 312, 1402–1406 (2006)

    2006

  184. [192]

    Yates, C. A. et al. United by noise: Randomness helps swarms stay together. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 106, 5464–5469 (2009)

    2009

  185. [193]

    & Goss, S

    Pasteels, J., Deneubourg, J.-L. & Goss, S. Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies (i): Trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources. From individual to collective behavior social insects 155–175 (1987)

    1987

  186. [194]

    Ants, rationality, and recruitment

    Kirman, A. Ants, rationality, and recruitment. The Q. J. Econ. 108, 137–156 (1993)

    1993

  187. [195]

    & Deneubourg, J.-L

    Detrain, C. & Deneubourg, J.-L. Self-organized structures in a superorganism: do ants “behave” like molecules? Phys. life Rev. 3, 162–187 (2006). 22/29

    2006

  188. [196]

    & McKane, A

    Biancalani, T., Dyson, L. & McKane, A. J. Noise-induced bistable states and their mean switching time in foraging colonies. Phys. review letters 112, 038101 (2014)

    2014

  189. [197]

    Jhawar, J. et al. Noise-induced schooling of fish. Nat. Phys. 16, 488–493 (2020)

    2020

  190. [198]

    C., Huepe, C

    Katz, Y ., Tunstrøm, K., Ioannou, C. C., Huepe, C. & Couzin, I. D. Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 18720–18725 (2011)

    2011

  191. [199]

    Herbert-Read, J. E. et al. Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 18726–18731 (2011)

    2011

  192. [200]

    Jiang, L. et al. Identifying influential neighbors in animal flocking. PLoS computational biology 13, e1005822 (2017)

    2017

  193. [201]

    Couzin, I. D. et al. Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups. science 334, 1578–1580 (2011)

    2011

  194. [202]

    Sayin, S. et al. The behavioral mechanisms governing collective motion in swarming locusts. Science 387, 995–1000 (2025)

    2025

  195. [203]

    Rajendran, H., Haluts, A., Gov, N. S. & Feinerman, O. Ants resort to majority concession to reach democratic consensus in the presence of a persistent minority. Curr. biology 32, 645–653 (2022)

    2022

  196. [204]

    Jeanson, R. et al. Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches. Animal behaviour 69, 169–180 (2005)

    2005

  197. [205]

    Treherne, J. E. & Foster, W. A. Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: the trafalgar effect. Animal Behav. 29, 911–917 (1981)

    1981

  198. [206]

    King, A. J. et al. Selfish-herd behaviour of sheep under threat. Curr. Biol. 22, R561–R562 (2012)

    2012

  199. [207]

    & Vicsek, T

    Helbing, D., Farkas, I. & Vicsek, T. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407, 487–490 (2000)

    2000

  200. [208]

    Hamilton, W. D. Geometry for the selfish herd. J. theoretical Biol. 31, 295–311 (1971)

    1971

  201. [209]

    Safety in numbers

    Foster, W. Safety in numbers. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 4551–4553 (2017)

    2017

  202. [210]

    Williams, G. C. Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought, vol. 61 (Princeton university press, 2018)

    2018

  203. [211]

    Ginelli, F. et al. Intermittent collective dynamics emerge from conflicting imperatives in sheep herds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 12729–12734 (2015)

    2015

  204. [212]

    & Peruani, F

    Gómez-Nava, L., Bon, R. & Peruani, F. Intermittent collective motion in sheep results from alternating the role of leader and follower. Nat. Phys. 18, 1494–1501 (2022)

    2022

  205. [213]

    Collective responses of flocking sheep (ovis aries) to a herding dog (border collie)

    Jadhav, V .et al. Collective responses of flocking sheep (ovis aries) to a herding dog (border collie). Commun. Biol. 7, 1543 (2024)

    2024

  206. [214]

    Li, L. et al. V ortex phase matching as a strategy for schooling in robots and in fish.Nat. communications 11, 5408 (2020)

    2020

  207. [215]

    & Ottaviani, G

    Nava, F., Canali, C., Catellani, F., Gavioli, G. & Ottaviani, G. Electron drift velocity in high-purity ge between 8 and 240k. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 9, 1685 (1976)

    1976

  208. [216]

    & Alexander, S

    Gefen, Y ., Aharony, A. & Alexander, S. Anomalous diffusion on percolating clusters.Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 77 (1983)

    1983

  209. [217]

    J., Baranger, H

    Stanton, C. J., Baranger, H. U. & Wilkins, J. W. Analytic boltzmann equation approach for negative differential mobility in two-valley semiconductors. Appl. physics letters 49, 176–178 (1986)

    1986

  210. [218]

    PG de Gennes’ Impact on Science: Solid state and liquid crystals, vol

    de Gennes, P.-G. PG de Gennes’ Impact on Science: Solid state and liquid crystals, vol. 1 (World Scientific, 2009)

    2009

  211. [219]

    & Feinerman, O

    Gelblum, A., Fonio, E., Rodeh, Y ., Korman, A. & Feinerman, O. Ant collective cognition allows for efficient navigation through disordered environments. Elife 9, e55195 (2020)

    2020

  212. [220]

    & Detrain, C

    Deneubourg, J.-L., Lioni, A. & Detrain, C. Dynamics of aggregation and emergence of cooperation. The Biol. Bull. 202, 262–267 (2002)

    2002

  213. [221]

    Prasath, S. G. et al. Dynamics of cooperative excavation in ant and robot collectives. Elife 11, e79638 (2022)

    2022

  214. [222]

    & Bonabeau, E

    Theraulaz, G. & Bonabeau, E. A brief history of stigmergy. Artif. life 5, 97–116 (1999)

    1999

  215. [223]

    & Theraulaz, G

    Dorigo, M., Bonabeau, E. & Theraulaz, G. Ant algorithms and stigmergy. Futur. generation computer systems 16, 851–871 (2000)

    2000

  216. [224]

    Tschinkel, W. R. The nest architecture of the florida harvester ant, pogonomyrmex badius. J. Insect Sci. 4, 21 (2004). 23/29

    2004

  217. [225]

    L., Grimal, A

    Buhl, J., Deneubourg, J. L., Grimal, A. & Theraulaz, G. Self-organized digging activity in ant colonies. Behav. ecology sociobiology 58, 9–17 (2005)

    2005

  218. [226]

    Tanner, D. A. & Visscher, P. K. Do honey bees average directions in the waggle dance to determine a flight direction? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 1891–1898 (2008)

    2008

  219. [227]

    Valentini, G. et al. Naïve individuals promote collective exploration in homing pigeons. Elife 10, e68653 (2021)

    2021

  220. [228]

    & Tóth, Á

    Nakagaki, T., Yamada, H. & Tóth, Á. Maze-solving by an amoeboid organism. Nature 407, 470–470 (2000)

    2000

  221. [229]

    Gilpin, W., Prakash, V . N. & Prakash, M. V ortex arrays and ciliary tangles underlie the feeding–swimming trade-off in starfish larvae. Nat. Phys. 13, 380–386 (2017)

    2017

  222. [230]

    S., Prakash, V

    Bull, M. S., Prakash, V . N. & Prakash, M. Ciliary flocking and emergent instabilities enable collective agility in a non-neuromuscular animal. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02934 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  223. [231]

    Bull, M. S. & Prakash, M. Mobile defects born from an energy cascade shape the locomotive behavior of a headless animal. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02940 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  224. [232]

    & Tielbörger, K

    Gruntman, M., Groß, D., Májeková, M. & Tielbörger, K. Decision-making in plants under competition. Nat. communica- tions 8, 2235 (2017)

    2017

  225. [233]

    Nguyen, C. et al. Noisy circumnutations facilitate self-organized shade avoidance in sunflowers. Phys. Rev. X 14, 031027 (2024)

    2024

  226. [234]

    & Jalaal, M

    Schramma, N., Perugachi Israëls, C. & Jalaal, M. Chloroplasts in plant cells show active glassy behavior under low-light conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2216497120 (2023)

    2023

  227. [235]

    & Meroz, Y

    Rivière, M. & Meroz, Y . Plants sum and subtract stimuli over different timescales.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.120, e2306655120 (2023)

    2023

  228. [236]

    Dacke, M., Baird, E., Byrne, M., Scholtz, C. H. & Warrant, E. J. Dung beetles use the milky way for orientation. Curr. biology 23, 298–300 (2013)

    2013

  229. [237]

    Foster, J. J.et al. Stellar performance: mechanisms underlying milky way orientation in dung beetles.Philos. Transactions Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 372, 20160079 (2017)

    2017

  230. [238]

    Khaldy, L. et al. The effect of step size on straight-line orientation. J. Royal Soc. Interface 16, 20190181 (2019)

    2019

  231. [239]

    S., Bisch, S

    Collett, M., Collett, T. S., Bisch, S. & Wehner, R. Local and global vectors in desert ant navigation. Nature 394, 269–272 (1998)

    1998

  232. [240]

    Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks

    Wehner, R. Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J. Comp. Physiol. A 189, 579–588 (2003)

    2003

  233. [241]

    Chatterjee, A., Tzook, T., Gov, N. S. & Feinerman, O. Maximal response to a mechanical leader at critical group size in ant collectives. Nat. Commun. 16, 5983 (2025)

    2025

  234. [242]

    Cipra, B. A. An introduction to the ising model. The Am. Math. Mon. 94, 937–959 (1987)

    1987

  235. [243]

    Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Statistical Physics: Volume 5, vol. 5 (Elsevier, 2013)

    2013

  236. [244]

    Ballerini, M. et al. Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study. Proc. national academy sciences 105, 1232–1237 (2008)

    2008

  237. [245]

    Jenkins, S. et al. Breaking through the mermin-wagner limit in 2d van der waals magnets. Nat. Commun. 13, 6917 (2022)

    2022

  238. [246]

    Toner, J. & Tu, Y . Flocks, herds, and schools: A quantitative theory of flocking.Phys. review E 58, 4828 (1998)

    1998

  239. [247]

    Cavagna, A. et al. Scale-free correlations in starling flocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 11865–11870 (2010)

    2010

  240. [248]

    Welte, M. A. Bidirectional transport along microtubules. Curr. Biol. 14, R525–R537 (2004)

    2004

  241. [249]

    L., Ali, M

    Ross, J. L., Ali, M. Y . & Warshaw, D. M. Cargo transport: molecular motors navigate a complex cytoskeleton. Curr. opinion cell biology 20, 41–47 (2008)

    2008

  242. [250]

    Gelblum, A. et al. Ant groups optimally amplify the effect of transiently informed individuals. Nat. communications 6, 7729 (2015)

    2015

  243. [251]

    & Gov, N

    Feinerman, O., Pinkoviezky, I., Gelblum, A., Fonio, E. & Gov, N. S. The physics of cooperative transport in groups of ants. Nat. Phys. 14, 683–693 (2018)

    2018

  244. [252]

    Kunwar, A. et al. Mechanical stochastic tug-of-war models cannot explain bidirectional lipid-droplet transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 18960–18965 (2011). 24/29

    2011

  245. [253]

    & Daniels, B

    Romanczuk, P. & Daniels, B. C. Phase transitions and criticality in the collective behavior of animals—self-organization and biological function. In Order, Disorder and Criticality: Advanced Problems of Phase Transition Theory, 179–208 (World Scientific, 2023)

    2023

  246. [254]

    Hengen, K. B. & Shew, W. L. Is criticality a unified setpoint of brain function? Neuron (2024)

    2024

  247. [255]

    & Bialek, W

    Mora, T. & Bialek, W. Are biological systems poised at criticality? J. Stat. Phys. 144, 268–302 (2011)

    2011

  248. [256]

    Patil, V . P.et al. Ultrafast reversible self-assembly of living tangled matter. Science 380, 392–398 (2023)

    2023

  249. [257]

    & MacLennan, D

    Hall, S., Wardle, C. & MacLennan, D. Predator evasion in a fish school: test of a model for the fountain effect. Mar. biology 91, 143–148 (1986)

    1986

  250. [258]

    D., Krause, J., James, R., Ruxton, G

    Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., James, R., Ruxton, G. D. & Franks, N. R. Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. J. theoretical biology 218, 1–11 (2002)

    2002

  251. [259]

    D., Krause, J., Franks, N

    Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R. & Levin, S. A. Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 433, 513–516 (2005)

    2005

  252. [260]

    Tunstrøm, K. et al. Collective states, multistability and transitional behavior in schooling fish. PLoS computational biology 9, e1002915 (2013)

    2013

  253. [261]

    Calovi, D. S. et al. Swarming, schooling, milling: phase diagram of a data-driven fish school model. New journal Phys. 16, 015026 (2014)

    2014

  254. [262]

    Bartashevich, P. et al. Collective anti-predator escape manoeuvres through optimal attack and avoidance strategies. Commun. Biol. 7, 1586 (2024)

    2024

  255. [263]

    Sosna, M. M. et al. Individual and collective encoding of risk in animal groups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 20556–20561 (2019)

    2019

  256. [264]

    Attanasi, A. et al. Finite-size scaling as a way to probe near-criticality in natural swarms. Phys. review letters 113, 238102 (2014)

    2014

  257. [265]

    Hidalgo, J. et al. Information-based fitness and the emergence of criticality in living systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 10095–10100 (2014)

    2014

  258. [266]

    & Muñoz, M

    Chaté, H. & Muñoz, M. A. Insect swarms go critical. Physics 7, 120 (2014)

    2014

  259. [267]

    Bialek, W. et al. Social interactions dominate speed control in poising natural flocks near criticality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 7212–7217 (2014)

    2014

  260. [268]

    Poel, W. et al. Subcritical escape waves in schooling fish. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm6385 (2022)

    2022

  261. [269]

    Reid, C. R. et al. Army ants dynamically adjust living bridges in response to a cost–benefit trade-off. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 15113–15118 (2015)

    2015

  262. [270]

    F., Gemayel, G., Pais, A

    McCreery, H. F., Gemayel, G., Pais, A. I., Garnier, S. & Nagpal, R. Hysteresis stabilizes dynamic control of self-assembled army ant constructions. Nat. communications 13, 1160 (2022)

    2022

  263. [271]

    & Fonio, E

    Heckenthaler, T., Holder, T., Amir, A., Feinerman, O. & Fonio, E. Connecting cooperative transport by ants with the physics of self-propelled particles. PRX Life 1, 023001 (2023)

    2023

  264. [272]

    Gelblum, A., Pinkoviezky, I., Fonio, E., Gov, N. S. & Feinerman, O. Emergent oscillations assist obstacle negotiation during ant cooperative transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 14615–14620 (2016)

    2016

  265. [273]

    E., Pinkoviezky, I., Fonio, E., Feinerman, O

    Ron, J. E., Pinkoviezky, I., Fonio, E., Feinerman, O. & Gov, N. S. Bi-stability in cooperative transport by ants in the presence of obstacles. PLoS computational biology 14, e1006068 (2018)

    2018

  266. [274]

    & Kuramoto, Y .Chemical turbulence (Springer, 1984)

    Kuramoto, Y . & Kuramoto, Y .Chemical turbulence (Springer, 1984)

    1984

  267. [275]

    Strogatz, S. H. & Stewart, I. Coupled oscillators and biological synchronization. Sci. american 269, 102–109 (1993)

    1993

  268. [276]

    Strogatz, S. H. Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering (studies in nonlinearity). Nonlinear Dyn. Chaos: With Appl. to Physics, Biol. Chem. Eng. (Studies Nonlinearity) (2001)

    2001

  269. [277]

    H., Abrams, D

    Strogatz, S. H., Abrams, D. M., McRobie, A., Eckhardt, B. & Ott, E. Crowd synchrony on the millennium bridge. Nature 438, 43–44 (2005)

    2005

  270. [278]

    A., Bonilla, L

    Acebrón, J. A., Bonilla, L. L., Pérez Vicente, C. J., Ritort, F. & Spigler, R. The kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Rev. modern physics 77, 137–185 (2005)

    2005

  271. [279]

    Buck, J. B. Synchronous rhythmic flashing of fireflies. The Q. Rev. Biol. 13, 301–314 (1938). 25/29

    1938

  272. [280]

    Sarfati, R., Hayes, J. C. & Peleg, O. Self-organization in natural swarms of photinus carolinus synchronous fireflies. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg9259 (2021)

    2021

  273. [281]

    & Peleg, O

    Sarfati, R. & Peleg, O. Chimera states among synchronous fireflies. Sci. Adv. 8, eadd6690 (2022)

    2022

  274. [282]

    Walker, T. J. Acoustic synchrony: two mechanisms in the snowy tree cricket. Science 166, 891–894 (1969)

    1969

  275. [283]

    Synchronous, alternating, and phase-locked stridulation by a tropical katydid

    Sismondo, E. Synchronous, alternating, and phase-locked stridulation by a tropical katydid. Science 249, 55–58 (1990)

    1990

  276. [284]

    Greenfield, M. D. & Schul, J. Mechanisms and evolution of synchronous chorusing: emergent properties and adaptive functions in neoconocephalus katydids (orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J. comparative psychology 122, 289 (2008)

    2008

  277. [285]

    D., Marin-Cudraz, T

    Greenfield, M. D., Marin-Cudraz, T. & Party, V . Evolution of synchronies in insect choruses.Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 122, 487–504 (2017)

    2017

  278. [286]

    Greenfield, M. D. & Merker, B. Coordinated rhythms in animal species, including humans: entrainment from bushcricket chorusing to the philharmonic orchestra. Neurosci. & Biobehav. Rev. 153, 105382 (2023)

    2023

  279. [287]

    A., Spector, D

    Staicer, C. A., Spector, D. A. & Horn, A. G. The dawn chorus and other diel patterns in acoustic signaling.Ecol. evolution acoustic communication birds 426–453 (1996)

    1996

  280. [288]

    E., Pesci, A

    Goldstein, R. E., Pesci, A. I., Gov, N. et al. Photometric decision-making during the dawn choruses of cicadas. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07121 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  281. [289]

    de Cunha, R. G. T., de Oliveira, D. A. G., Holzmann, I. & Kitchen, D. M. Production of loud and quiet calls in howler monkeys. Howler monkeys: Adapt. radiation, systematics, morphology 337–368 (2015)

    2015

  282. [290]

    Cvikel, N. et al. On-board recordings reveal no jamming avoidance in wild bats. Proc. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 282, 20142274 (2015)

    2015

  283. [291]

    Cvikel, N. et al. Bats aggregate to improve prey search but might be impaired when their density becomes too high. Curr. Biol. 25, 206–211 (2015)

    2015

  284. [292]

    & Foster, W

    Treherne, J. & Foster, W. Group size and anti-predator strategies in a marine insect. Animal Behav. 30, 536–542 (1982)

    1982

  285. [293]

    Kastberger, G. et al. How to join a wave: decision-making processes in shimmering behavior of giant honeybees (apis dorsata). PLoS One 7, e36736 (2012)

    2012

  286. [294]

    Doran, C. et al. Fish waves as emergent collective antipredator behavior. Curr. Biol. 32, 708–714 (2022)

    2022

  287. [295]

    B., Twomey, C

    Rosenthal, S. B., Twomey, C. R., Hartnett, A. T., Wu, H. S. & Couzin, I. D. Revealing the hidden networks of interaction in mobile animal groups allows prediction of complex behavioral contagion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 4690–4695 (2015)

    2015

  288. [296]

    Hoppensteadt, F. C. & Keller, J. B. Synchronization of periodical cicada emergences. Science 194, 335–337 (1976)

    1976

  289. [297]

    W., Mechtley, B., Walter, J

    Sheppard, L. W., Mechtley, B., Walter, J. A. & Reuman, D. C. Self-organizing cicada choruses respond to the local sound and light environment. Ecol. Evol. 10, 4471–4482 (2020)

    2020

  290. [298]

    E., Jack, R

    Goldstein, R. E., Jack, R. L. & Pesci, A. I. How do cicadas emerge together? thermophysical aspects of their collective decision-making. Phys. Rev. E 109, L022401 (2024)

    2024

  291. [299]

    & Mast, C

    Matreux, T., Aikkila, P., Scheu, B., Braun, D. & Mast, C. B. Heat flows enrich prebiotic building blocks and enhance their reactivity. Nature 628, 110–116 (2024)

    2024

  292. [1909]

    Entropy 17, 1971–2009 (2015)

    1971

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.