REVIEW 3 cited by
Risk Assessment and Security Analysis of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Risk Assessment and Security Analysis of Large Language Models
read the original abstract
As large language models (LLMs) expose systemic security challenges in high risk applications, including privacy leaks, bias amplification, and malicious abuse, there is an urgent need for a dynamic risk assessment and collaborative defence framework that covers their entire life cycle. This paper focuses on the security problems of large language models (LLMs) in critical application scenarios, such as the possibility of disclosure of user data, the deliberate input of harmful instructions, or the models bias. To solve these problems, we describe the design of a system for dynamic risk assessment and a hierarchical defence system that allows different levels of protection to cooperate. This paper presents a risk assessment system capable of evaluating both static and dynamic indicators simultaneously. It uses entropy weighting to calculate essential data, such as the frequency of sensitive words, whether the API call is typical, the realtime risk entropy value is significant, and the degree of context deviation. The experimental results show that the system is capable of identifying concealed attacks, such as role escape, and can perform rapid risk evaluation. The paper uses a hybrid model called BERT-CRF (Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers) at the input layer to identify and filter malicious commands. The model layer uses dynamic adversarial training and differential privacy noise injection technology together. The output layer also has a neural watermarking system that can track the source of the content. In practice, the quality of this method, especially important in terms of customer service in the financial industry.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
CKG-LLM: LLM-Assisted Detection of Smart Contract Access Control Vulnerabilities Based on Knowledge Graphs
CKG-LLM uses LLMs to generate executable queries over contract knowledge graphs for detecting access control vulnerabilities and reports superior performance versus existing tools.
-
A Comprehensive Evaluation and Practice of System Penetration Testing
A survey-style paper that proposes a weighted tool-scoring rubric, then demonstrates routine host and web penetration tests on vulnerable virtual machines.
-
Security Analysis of Ponzi Schemes in Ethereum Smart Contracts
A known four-way classification of Ponzi smart contracts is restated and run through the Mythril scanner on a few examples, while the claimed 500-contract batch analysis is asserted without releasing data or results.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.