Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Nonlinearities of Schwarzschild Black Hole Head-on Collisions

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper derives analytically the amplitude of the quadratic quasi-normal mode in the ringdown of two head-on colliding Schwarzschild black holes, showing that second-order perturbation theory suffices.

desk verdict A plausible analytic result for quadratic ringdown amplitudes in head-on collisions, but the corrupted full text prevents me from verifying the math; it deserves a serious referee if the equations hold up. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.17993 v1 pith:ZLXBG77U submitted 2025-08-25 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-phhep-th

classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-phhep-th
keywords quasi-normalmodessecond-orderperturbationtheoryringdownSchwarzschildblackholeshead-oncollisiongravitationalwavesnonlinearbootstrapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a genuinely nonlinear part of the gravitational wave from an ultra-relativistic head-on collision of two non-spinning Schwarzschild black holes can be computed by hand. Specifically, it derives the amplitude of the quadratic quasi-normal mode that appears in the ringdown, using only second-order perturbation theory around a single Schwarzschild background. The nonlinear contribution is not put in by hand; it emerges from the linear modes through a bootstrapping procedure. A sympathetic reader would care because it turns a strongly nonlinear event into a tractable first-principles calculation, with a concrete prediction that numerical relativity can check.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is second-order perturbation theory on a Schwarzschild background, applied to the ringdown. The key step is the bootstrap: solve the linear perturbative equations first, then form products of those linear quasi-normal modes and use them as the explicit source term in the second-order equations. This converts the nonlinear ringdown problem into a set of sourced ordinary differential equations, whose solution yields the quadratic quasi-normal mode amplitude.

What would settle it

A numerical relativity simulation of an ultra-relativistic head-on collision of two equal-mass, non-spinning Schwarzschild black holes should measure the amplitude of the quadratic quasi-normal mode with high precision; a statistically significant deviation from the analytic formula would falsify the claim that second-order perturbation theory suffices.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the quadratic quasi-normal mode in the ringdown after a head-on collision is sourced by, and its amplitude fixed by, the product of two linear quasi-normal modes. Working at second order in perturbation theory around a Schwarzschild black hole, the paper writes the quadratic perturbation as a wave equation whose right-hand side is the square of the first-order solution. Solving this sourced equation gives an analytic expression for the quadratic mode amplitude. The paper therefore asserts that second-order perturbation theory, despite the collision being highly nonlinear, captures the nonlinearity of the ringdown completely at this order.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation rests on the assumption that the ringdown of an ultra-relativistic head-on collision can be described by second-order perturbation theory around a single Schwarzschild background, with the quadratic mode sourced solely by products of linear modes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A direct comparison of the analytic quadratic-mode amplitude against numerical relativity simulations of head-on collisions becomes a sharp, quantitative test of second-order perturbation theory in strong-field gravity.
  • Waveform models for black-hole merger ringdowns can be extended to include the quadratic mode without fitting it to simulations, improving the physical content of ringdown templates.
  • The same bootstrapping scheme can be iterated to compute higher-order nonlinear modes, giving a systematic perturbative expansion of the nonlinear ringdown.
  • The result indicates that the nonlinearity of the ringdown is controlled by the linear mode content, which may simplify parameter estimation for future gravitational-wave observations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's logic suggests that any collision whose ringdown is dominated by a single Schwarzschild background could be treated the same way; whether this extends to spinning remnants is a natural next test.
  • An implicit assumption is that the highly nonlinear collision region and the perturbative ringdown region are cleanly separated; off-axis or unequal-mass collisions may violate this separation and reveal the limit of the approach.
  • If confirmed by numerical data, the result would support applying perturbative bootstrapping to other nonlinear gravitational phenomena, such as nonlinear memory effects or black-hole echoes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to derive analytically the amplitude of the quadratic quasi-normal mode in the ringdown stage of an ultra-relativistic head-on collision of two non-spinning Schwarzschild black holes, using second-order perturbation theory and a bootstrapping procedure. The abstract states that 'second-order perturbation theory suffices' despite the highly nonlinear nature of the event. However, the full text of the manuscript is corrupted: it consists largely of garbled, unreadable text and ends with an arXiv identifier for a different cs.RO paper, so no equations, derivations, or numerical data are available for review. The only substantive content is the abstract itself.

Significance. If the claimed derivation were actually presented and correct, the result would be significant for gravitational-wave ringdown modeling and for the theory of nonlinear quasi-normal modes in strong-field gravity. The abstract makes a specific, potentially falsifiable prediction about the quadratic mode amplitude, which is a positive feature. However, the manuscript as provided contains no machine-checked proofs, no reproducible code, no parameter-free derivation, and no numerical comparison. Because the full text is unreadable and ends with an unrelated arXiv identifier, the central claim cannot be checked; this is a missing-evidence problem rather than a demonstrated technical error.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (entire manuscript after the abstract)] The full text is corrupted: it consists of garbled, partially decodable fragments and ends with 'arXiv:2508.17986v3 [cs.RO] 4 Mar 2026', which is an identifier for an unrelated paper. No equation, derivation, or data set can be examined. This is a load-bearing omission because the paper's sole claim is an analytic derivation, and the abstract alone provides no way to verify the equations or the sufficiency of second-order perturbation theory.
  2. [Abstract] The assertion 'second-order perturbation theory suffices' is offered without any quantitative criterion for the size of neglected higher-order terms or for the validity of expanding around a single Schwarzschild background during an ultra-relativistic collision. This is the load-bearing premise of the claimed derivation, and it requires either an explicit error bound, a comparison with numerical relativity, or an argument based on the mode amplitudes; none is provided in the accessible text.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'derived by a simple bootstrapping procedure' raises a potential circularity concern: a quadratic quasi-normal mode amplitude is typically proportional to the square of a linear quasi-normal mode amplitude. If the linear amplitudes are taken as inputs from numerical relativity or from fits to waveforms, then the 'derivation' is not fully self-contained. The abstract does not state whether the linear amplitudes are obtained within the perturbative scheme or are assumed from external data, so the logical status of the claimed derivation is unclear.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The first sentence contains a grammatical error: 'Although being a highly nonlinear event' should read 'Although this is a highly nonlinear event'.
  2. [Abstract] The second sentence is missing a comma: 'second-order perturbation theory suffices and that nonlinearities may be derived' would read more clearly as 'second-order perturbation theory suffices, and that the nonlinearities may be derived'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity demonstrable from the available text; the supplied full text is corrupted, so no derivation chain can be checked.

full rationale

The only readable portion of the manuscript is the abstract, which states that the amplitude of the quadratic quasi-normal mode is derived analytically from second-order perturbation theory via a bootstrapping procedure. No equations, parameter fits, or citations are legible in the supplied full text, so I cannot exhibit any specific reduction of a claimed prediction to an input—for example, an equation in which the quadratic amplitude is set equal to a fitted linear amplitude, or a uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work. The abstract's assertion that second-order perturbation theory suffices is an assumption about the physics of the collision, not a circularity; an unsupported or unverifiable assumption is a missing-evidence problem rather than a self-referential derivation. Because the hard rules require quoting the paper and exhibiting the specific reduction before flagging circularity, and no such reduction is available, the appropriate finding is no demonstrated circularity (score 0). I note explicitly that the provided 'full text' is mojibake and terminates with an unrelated arXiv identifier (arXiv:2508.17986v3 [cs.RO] 4 Mar 2026), so the derivation chain cannot be checked from this file; that is a completeness/verification concern, not a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Review based solely on the abstract because the provided full text is corrupted. No free parameters or invented entities can be identified. Two domain assumptions are explicit or strongly implied by the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Second-order perturbation theory around a single Schwarzschild background is sufficient to describe the ringdown nonlinearities of the head-on collision.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract: 'second-order perturbation theory suffices'. This is the key enabling assumption that makes the derivation possible.
  • domain assumption The nonlinear (quadratic) quasi-normal mode is sourced by products of the linear quasi-normal mode, via a bootstrapping procedure.
    The abstract says nonlinearities 'may be derived by a simple bootstrapping procedure', implying the standard perturbation hierarchy where the second-order equation is sourced by the square of the first-order solution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinearities of Schwarzschild Black Hole Head-on Collisions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZLXBG77U

@misc{pith2026250817993,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinearities of Schwarzschild Black Hole Head-on Collisions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZLXBG77U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.17993}
}
read the original abstract

We derive analytically the amplitude of the quadratic quasi-normal mode generated in the ringdown stage of the gravitational waveform produced by the ultra-relativistic head-on collision of two non-spinning Schwarzschild black holes. Although being a highly nonlinear event, second-order perturbation theory suffices and that nonlinearities may be derived by a simple bootstrapping procedure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Computing nonlinearity ratios using second order black hole perturbation theory

    gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For the (2,2)×(2,2)→(4,4) channel, the WKB/matched-asymptotics scheme yields nonlinearity ratio 0.164 at infinity and 0.055 at the horizon, matching numerical relativity within its spread.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Berti et al

    author author E. Berti et al. ,\ 10.1088/0264-9381/32/24/243001 journal journal Class. Quant. Grav. \ volume 32 ,\ pages 243001 ( year 2015 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.07274 arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc] NoStop

  2. [2]

    Berti , author K

    author author E. Berti , author K. Yagi , author H. Yang , \ and\ author N. Yunes ,\ 10.1007/s10714-018-2372-6 journal journal Gen. Rel. Grav. \ volume 50 ,\ pages 49 ( year 2018 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03587 arXiv:1801.03587 [gr-qc] NoStop

  3. [3]

    Franciolini , author L

    author author G. Franciolini , author L. Hui , author R. Penco , author L. Santoni , \ and\ author E. Trincherini ,\ 10.1007/JHEP02(2019)127 journal journal JHEP \ volume 02 ,\ pages 127 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07706 arXiv:1810.07706 [hep-th] NoStop

  4. [4]

    Abbott et al

    author author R. Abbott et al. ( collaboration LIGO Scientific, Virgo ),\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.122002 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 103 ,\ pages 122002 ( year 2021 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.14529 arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc] NoStop

  5. [5]

    Berti , author V

    author author E. Berti , author V. Cardoso , \ and\ author C. M. \ Will ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.064030 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 73 ,\ pages 064030 ( year 2006 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0512160 arXiv:gr-qc/0512160 NoStop

  6. [6]

    author author B. P. \ Abbott et al. ( collaboration KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo ),\ 10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 journal journal Living Rev. Rel. \ volume 19 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2016 a ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0670 arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc] NoStop

  7. [7]

    author author B. P. \ Abbott et al. ( collaboration LIGO Scientific, Virgo ),\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 061102 ( year 2016 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03837 arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc] NoStop

  8. [8]

    Abbott et al

    author author R. Abbott et al. ( collaboration KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific ),\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 13 ,\ pages 041039 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03606 arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc] NoStop

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    author author A. G. \ Abac et al. ( collaboration LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO ),\ 10.3847/1538-4357/ad65ce journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 973 ,\ pages 132 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03822 arXiv:2308.03822 [astro-ph.HE] NoStop

  2. [10]

    Berti et al

    author author E. Berti et al. ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23895 arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc] NoStop

  3. [11]

    author author E. S. C. \ Ching , author P. T. \ Leung , author W. M. \ Suen , \ and\ author K. Young ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2414 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 74 ,\ pages 2414 ( year 1995 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9410044 arXiv:gr-qc/9410044 NoStop

  4. [12]

    Krivan , author P

    author author W. Krivan , author P. Laguna , \ and\ author P. Papadopoulos ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.4728 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 54 ,\ pages 4728 ( year 1996 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9606003 arXiv:gr-qc/9606003 NoStop

  5. [13]

    Krivan , author P

    author author W. Krivan , author P. Laguna , author P. Papadopoulos , \ and\ author N. Andersson ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3395 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 56 ,\ pages 3395 ( year 1997 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9702048 arXiv:gr-qc/9702048 NoStop

  6. [14]

    Krivan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.101501 journal journal Phys

    author author W. Krivan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.101501 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 60 ,\ pages 101501 ( year 1999 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9907038 arXiv:gr-qc/9907038 NoStop

  7. [15]

    author author L. M. \ Burko \ and\ author G. Khanna ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.081502 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 67 ,\ pages 081502 ( year 2003 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0209107 arXiv:gr-qc/0209107 NoStop

  8. [16]

    author author L. M. \ Burko \ and\ author G. Khanna ,\ 10.1088/0264-9381/26/1/015014 journal journal Class. Quant. Grav. \ volume 26 ,\ pages 015014 ( year 2009 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.0960 arXiv:0711.0960 [gr-qc] NoStop

  9. [17]

    Hod ,\ 10.1088/0264-9381/26/2/028001 journal journal Class

    author author S. Hod ,\ 10.1088/0264-9381/26/2/028001 journal journal Class. Quant. Grav. \ volume 26 ,\ pages 028001 ( year 2009 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.0237 arXiv:0902.0237 [gr-qc] NoStop

  10. [18]

    author author L. M. \ Burko \ and\ author G. Khanna ,\ 10.1088/0264-9381/28/2/025012 journal journal Class. Quant. Grav. \ volume 28 ,\ pages 025012 ( year 2011 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0541 arXiv:1001.0541 [gr-qc] NoStop

  11. [19]

    Racz \ and\ author G

    author author I. Racz \ and\ author G. Z. \ Toth ,\ 10.1088/0264-9381/28/19/195003 journal journal Class. Quant. Grav. \ volume 28 ,\ pages 195003 ( year 2011 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4199 arXiv:1104.4199 [gr-qc] NoStop

  12. [20]

    Zengino g lu , author G

    author author A. Zengino g lu , author G. Khanna , \ and\ author L. M. \ Burko ,\ 10.1007/s10714-014-1672-8 journal journal Gen. Rel. Grav. \ volume 46 ,\ pages 1672 ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5839 arXiv:1208.5839 [gr-qc] NoStop

  13. [21]

    author author L. M. \ Burko \ and\ author G. Khanna ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.044037 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 89 ,\ pages 044037 ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5247 arXiv:1312.5247 [gr-qc] NoStop

  14. [22]

    Baibhav , author M

    author author V. Baibhav , author M. H.-Y. \ Cheung , author E. Berti , author V. Cardoso , author G. Carullo , author R. Cotesta , author W. Del Pozzo , \ and\ author F. Duque ,\ @noop \ ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03050 arXiv:2302.03050 [gr-qc] NoStop

  15. [23]

    author author R. F. \ Rosato \ and\ author P. Pani ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08877 arXiv:2505.08877 [gr-qc] NoStop

  16. [24]

    Ianniccari , author L

    author author A. Ianniccari , author L. L. \ Bianco , \ and\ author A. Riotto ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17732 arXiv:2507.17732 [gr-qc] NoStop

  17. [25]

    author author R. J. \ Gleiser , author C. O. \ Nicasio , author R. H. \ Price , \ and\ author J. Pullin ,\ 10.1088/0264-9381/13/10/001 journal journal Class. Quant. Grav. \ volume 13 ,\ pages L117 ( year 1996 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9510049 arXiv:gr-qc/9510049 NoStop

  18. [26]

    author author R. J. \ Gleiser , author C. O. \ Nicasio , author R. H. \ Price , \ and\ author J. Pullin ,\ 10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00048-4 journal journal Phys. Rept. \ volume 325 ,\ pages 41 ( year 2000 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9807077 arXiv:gr-qc/9807077 NoStop

  19. [27]

    Campanelli \ and\ author C

    author author M. Campanelli \ and\ author C. O. \ Lousto ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.124022 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 59 ,\ pages 124022 ( year 1999 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9811019 arXiv:gr-qc/9811019 NoStop

  20. [28]

    Garat \ and\ author R

    author author A. Garat \ and\ author R. H. \ Price ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.044006 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 61 ,\ pages 044006 ( year 2000 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9909005 arXiv:gr-qc/9909005 NoStop

  21. [29]

    Zlochower , author R

    author author Y. Zlochower , author R. Gomez , author S. Husa , author L. Lehner , \ and\ author J. Winicour ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.084014 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 68 ,\ pages 084014 ( year 2003 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0306098 arXiv:gr-qc/0306098 NoStop

  22. [30]

    Brizuela , author J

    author author D. Brizuela , author J. M. \ Martin-Garcia , \ and\ author G. A. \ Mena Marugan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.044039 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 74 ,\ pages 044039 ( year 2006 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0607025 arXiv:gr-qc/0607025 NoStop

  23. [31]

    Brizuela , author J

    author author D. Brizuela , author J. M. \ Martin-Garcia , \ and\ author G. A. M. \ Marugan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.024004 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 76 ,\ pages 024004 ( year 2007 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0703069 arXiv:gr-qc/0703069 NoStop

  24. [32]

    Nakano \ and\ author K

    author author H. Nakano \ and\ author K. Ioka ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.084007 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 76 ,\ pages 084007 ( year 2007 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0450 arXiv:0708.0450 [gr-qc] NoStop

  25. [33]

    Brizuela , author J

    author author D. Brizuela , author J. M. \ Martin-Garcia , \ and\ author M. Tiglio ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.024021 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 80 ,\ pages 024021 ( year 2009 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.1134 arXiv:0903.1134 [gr-qc] NoStop

  26. [34]

    author author J. L. \ Ripley , author N. Loutrel , author E. Giorgi , \ and\ author F. Pretorius ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104018 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 103 ,\ pages 104018 ( year 2021 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.00162 arXiv:2010.00162 [gr-qc] NoStop

  27. [35]

    Loutrel , author J

    author author N. Loutrel , author J. L. \ Ripley , author E. Giorgi , \ and\ author F. Pretorius ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104017 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 103 ,\ pages 104017 ( year 2021 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11770 arXiv:2008.11770 [gr-qc] NoStop

  28. [36]

    Pazos , author D

    author author E. Pazos , author D. Brizuela , author J. M. \ Martin-Garcia , \ and\ author M. Tiglio ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.104028 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 82 ,\ pages 104028 ( year 2010 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.4665 arXiv:1009.4665 [gr-qc] NoStop

  29. [37]

    Sberna , author P

    author author L. Sberna , author P. Bosch , author W. E. \ East , author S. R. \ Green , \ and\ author L. Lehner ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.064046 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 105 ,\ pages 064046 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11168 arXiv:2112.11168 [gr-qc] NoStop

  30. [38]

    Redondo-Yuste , author G

    author author J. Redondo-Yuste , author G. Carullo , author J. L. \ Ripley , author E. Berti , \ and\ author V. Cardoso ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L101503 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 109 ,\ pages L101503 ( year 2024 a ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14796 arXiv:2308.1479...

  31. [39]

    Mitman et al

    author author K. Mitman et al. ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.081402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 130 ,\ pages 081402 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.07380 arXiv:2208.07380 [gr-qc] NoStop

  32. [40]

    author author M. H.-Y. \ Cheung et al. ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.081401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 130 ,\ pages 081401 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.07374 arXiv:2208.07374 [gr-qc] NoStop

  33. [41]

    Ioka \ and\ author H

    author author K. Ioka \ and\ author H. Nakano ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.061503 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 76 ,\ pages 061503 ( year 2007 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3467 arXiv:0704.3467 [astro-ph] NoStop

  34. [42]

    Kehagias , author D

    author author A. Kehagias , author D. Perrone , author A. Riotto , \ and\ author F. Riva ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L021501 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 108 ,\ pages L021501 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.09345 arXiv:2301.09345 [gr-qc] NoStop

  35. [43]

    Khera , author A

    author author N. Khera , author A. Ribes Metidieri , author B. Bonga , author X. Jim\'enez Forteza , author B. Krishnan , author E. Poisson , author D. Pook-Kolb , author E. Schnetter , \ and\ author H. Yang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.231401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ ...

  36. [44]

    Bucciotti , author A

    author author B. Bucciotti , author A. Kuntz , author F. Serra , \ and\ author E. Trincherini ,\ 10.1007/JHEP12(2023)048 journal journal JHEP \ volume 12 ,\ pages 048 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08501 arXiv:2309.08501 [hep-th] NoStop

  37. [45]

    Spiers , author A

    author author A. Spiers , author A. Pound , \ and\ author J. Moxon ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.064002 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 108 ,\ pages 064002 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19332 arXiv:2305.19332 [gr-qc] NoStop

  38. [46]

    Ma \ and\ author H

    author author S. Ma \ and\ author H. Yang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.104070 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 109 ,\ pages 104070 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15516 arXiv:2401.15516 [gr-qc] NoStop

  39. [47]

    Zhu et al

    author author H. Zhu et al. ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.104050 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 109 ,\ pages 104050 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00805 arXiv:2401.00805 [gr-qc] NoStop

  40. [48]

    Redondo-Yuste , author D

    author author J. Redondo-Yuste , author D. Pere\ niguez , \ and\ author V. Cardoso ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.044048 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 109 ,\ pages 044048 ( year 2024 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04633 arXiv:2312.04633 [gr-qc] NoStop

  41. [49]

    Bourg , author R

    author author P. Bourg , author R. Panosso Macedo , author A. Spiers , author B. Leather , author B. Bonga , \ and\ author A. Pound ,\ @noop \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10270 arXiv:2405.10270 [gr-qc] NoStop

  42. [50]

    Lagos , author T

    author author M. Lagos , author T. Andrade , author J. Rafecas-Ventosa , \ and\ author L. Hui ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.024018 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 111 ,\ pages 024018 ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02264 arXiv:2411.02264 [gr-qc] NoStop

  43. [51]

    Perrone , author T

    author author D. Perrone , author T. Barreira , author A. Kehagias , \ and\ author A. Riotto ,\ 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2023.116432 journal journal Nucl. Phys. B \ volume 999 ,\ pages 116432 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15886 arXiv:2308.15886 [gr-qc] NoStop

  44. [52]

    Kehagias \ and\ author A

    author author A. Kehagias \ and\ author A. Riotto ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L041506 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 111 ,\ pages L041506 ( year 2025 a ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07980 arXiv:2411.07980 [gr-qc] NoStop

  45. [53]

    Bucciotti , author V

    author author B. Bucciotti , author V. Cardoso , author A. Kuntz , author D. Pere\ niguez , \ and\ author J. Redondo-Yuste ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17950 arXiv:2501.17950 [gr-qc] NoStop

  46. [54]

    Bourg , author R

    author author P. Bourg , author R. P. \ Macedo , author A. Spiers , author B. Leather , author B. Béatrice , \ and\ author A. Pound ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07432 title Quadratic quasinormal modes at null infinity on a schwarzschild spacetime , \ ( year 2025 ),\ http://ar...

  47. [55]

    Ben Achour \ and\ author H

    author author J. Ben Achour \ and\ author H. Roussille ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/085 journal journal JCAP \ volume 07 ,\ pages 085 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08159 arXiv:2406.08159 [gr-qc] NoStop

  48. [56]

    Kehagias , author D

    author author A. Kehagias , author D. Perrone , \ and\ author A. Riotto ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09350 arXiv:2503.09350 [gr-qc] NoStop

  49. [57]

    Kehagias \ and\ author A

    author author A. Kehagias \ and\ author A. Riotto ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06224 arXiv:2504.06224 [gr-qc] NoStop

  50. [58]

    Kehagias \ and\ author A

    author author A. Kehagias \ and\ author A. Riotto ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 c ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14475 arXiv:2506.14475 [gr-qc] NoStop

  51. [59]

    Perrone , author A

    author author D. Perrone , author A. Kehagias , \ and\ author A. Riotto ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01919 arXiv:2507.01919 [gr-qc] NoStop

  52. [60]

    Ma , author L

    author author S. Ma , author L. Lehner , author H. Yang , author L. E. \ Kidder , author H. P. \ Pfeiffer , \ and\ author M. A. \ Scheel ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13294 arXiv:2508.13294 [gr-qc] NoStop

  53. [61]

    Sperhake , author V

    author author U. Sperhake , author V. Cardoso , author F. Pretorius , author E. Berti , \ and\ author J. A. \ Gonzalez ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.161101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 101 ,\ pages 161101 ( year 2008 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1738 arXiv:0806.173...

  54. [62]

    author author R. H. \ Price \ and\ author J. Pullin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3297 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 72 ,\ pages 3297 ( year 1994 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9402039 arXiv:gr-qc/9402039 NoStop

  55. [63]

    author author J. Pullin ,\ in\ @noop booktitle 15th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation (GR15) \ ( year 1997 )\ pp.\ pages 87--105 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9803005 arXiv:gr-qc/9803005 NoStop

  56. [64]

    author author C. F. \ Sopuerta , author N. Yunes , \ and\ author P. Laguna ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.049901 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 74 ,\ pages 124010 ( year 2006 ) ,\ note [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 069903 (2007), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 78, 049901 (2008)] ,\ http://arxi...

  57. [65]

    author author C. O. \ Nicasio , author R. J. \ Gleiser , author R. H. \ Price , \ and\ author J. Pullin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.044024 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 59 ,\ pages 044024 ( year 1999 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9802063 arXiv:gr-qc/9802063 NoStop

  58. [66]

    De Amicis et al

    author author M. De Amicis et al. ,\ @noop \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06887 arXiv:2412.06887 [gr-qc] NoStop

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.