Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Morae: Proactively Pausing UI Agents for User Choices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.21456 v1 pith:LOTZNLVD submitted 2025-08-29 cs.HC cs.CLcs.CV

Morae: Proactively Pausing UI Agents for User Choices

classification cs.HC cs.CLcs.CV
keywords usersagentsmoraeuserchoicestasksagentautomatically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

User interface (UI) agents promise to make inaccessible or complex UIs easier to access for blind and low-vision (BLV) users. However, current UI agents typically perform tasks end-to-end without involving users in critical choices or making them aware of important contextual information, thus reducing user agency. For example, in our field study, a BLV participant asked to buy the cheapest available sparkling water, and the agent automatically chose one from several equally priced options, without mentioning alternative products with different flavors or better ratings. To address this problem, we introduce Morae, a UI agent that automatically identifies decision points during task execution and pauses so that users can make choices. Morae uses large multimodal models to interpret user queries alongside UI code and screenshots, and prompt users for clarification when there is a choice to be made. In a study over real-world web tasks with BLV participants, Morae helped users complete more tasks and select options that better matched their preferences, as compared to baseline agents, including OpenAI Operator. More broadly, this work exemplifies a mixed-initiative approach in which users benefit from the automation of UI agents while being able to express their preferences.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Chat and Clicks: GUI Agents for In-Situ Assistance via Live Interface Transformation

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GUI agents can transform live web interfaces in real-time via DOM manipulations to deliver contextual assistance directly within the application.

  2. Dark Patterns Meet GUI Agents: LLM Agent Susceptibility to Manipulative Interfaces and the Role of Human Oversight

    cs.HC 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    GUI agents frequently fall for deceptive interface designs, often without recognizing them, and human supervision of agents improves avoidance only partially while introducing new attention and workload costs.

  3. VeriOS: Query-Driven Proactive Human-Agent-GUI Interaction for Trustworthy OS Agents

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    VeriOS-Agent is an OS agent that proactively queries humans in untrustworthy scenarios via a query-driven framework and three-stage training, achieving 19.72% higher step-wise success rate over baselines while preserv...

  4. DroidRetriever: A Transparent and Steerable Automation System for Collaborative Mobile Information Seeking

    cs.HC 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DroidRetriever is a transparent steerable mobile automation system that decomposes information-seeking tasks with multi-LLM agents, navigates apps, synthesizes reports with screenshots, and provides a dashboard for re...