Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 63 references

Percolation transition in entangled granular networks

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Entanglement networks of vibrating C-shaped granular particles undergo a well-defined percolation transition, and a continuum percolation model of infinitely thin rings describes it, including its three-dimensional percolation universality

desk verdict Serious experimental+simulation study: entangled C-particle networks percolate and match a new ring continuum percolation model; core claim holds at small opening angles, but the Hopf-link edge criterion is unvalidated at large θ and the abstract overreaches. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.00216 v2 pith:K52FMTIE submitted 2025-08-29 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mech

Seongmin Kim , Daihui Wu , Yilong Han This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mech PACS 64.60.ah45.70.-n
keywords granularmatterentanglementnetworkpercolationtransitioncontinuumHopflinknonconvexparticlesdiscreteelementmethodfinite-sizescaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the random-looking tangles formed by vibrating C-shaped particles have a sharp, predictable connectivity structure: particles and their geometric links form a network that percolates as links accumulate, and the transition is the same universal geometric percolation found in random geometric graphs. Experiments and simulations show a giant entangled cluster appears once the mean number of links per particle passes a threshold near 2.1, and the order parameter, susceptibility, cluster-size distribution, average cluster length, clustering coefficient, and finite-size scaling all match a continuum percolation model of infinitely thin rings. If correct, the bulk connectivity of entangled granular matter can be predicted from geometry rather than from detailed contact mechanics. The paper also reports that the mean link number grows logarithmically in vibration time, linking entanglement buildup to slow aging in disordered systems.

What carries the argument

The central object is the entanglement network, whose nodes are particles and whose edges are Hopf links between their centerline circles, detected by the topological criterion of Eq. (5). On top of this sits the ring continuum percolation model—randomly placed, infinitely thin rings, connected when Hopf-linked—whose analytically derived excluded volume v_ex=πD³/3 supplies the reduced density η that makes data collapse possible. The combination turns a mechanically noisy granular system into a parameter-free geometric null model against which measured networks can be compared.

What would settle it

In DEM simulations at θ≈125°, build the network from force-transmitting contacts rather than Hopf links and measure S1(⟨k⟩), χ(⟨k⟩), and the cluster-size exponent; if these no longer collapse onto the ring CP model or follow τ=2.19, the claimed universality is an artifact of the link criterion rather than a property of the granular material.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Entanglement networks of C-shaped granular particles under vibration undergo a percolation transition belonging to the standard three-dimensional percolation universality class (τ≈2.19, β≈0.41, γ≈1.80), with an infinite-size threshold of ⟨k⟩c=2.11 links per particle. The evidence comes from experiments and DEM simulations: S1(⟨k⟩) and χ(⟨k⟩) for in-container networks at opening angles 20°–98° collapse onto Monte Carlo data for randomly placed infinitely thin rings; the same ring model captures average eccentricity, clustering coefficient, adjacency spectra, and cluster size distributions; and finite-size scaling with an effective density reproduces the standard critical exponents. The articl

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the topological criterion for two closed circles being interlocked (a Hopf link, Eq. 5) also represents a mechanical bond between open C-particles; the paper's own data show this approximation degrades at large opening angles, where lifted clusters frequently disintegrate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The connectivity of entangled granular assemblies can be described by a geometric null model: once the mean degree is known, quantities such as giant-cluster size, susceptibility, cluster length, and clustering coefficient are determined without mechanical fitting parameters.
  • The percolation threshold in mean degree is about 2.11, far above the value 1 for Erdős–Rényi random networks, so spatial packing constraints materially delay the onset of a giant entangled cluster.
  • Opening angle controls whether topological links behave as mechanical bonds: for large angles, lifted clusters disintegrate, the measured threshold shifts upward, and the network statistics deviate from the ring model.
  • Cluster size distributions and finite-size collapses follow the standard 3D percolation exponents, implying universal critical behavior rather than system-specific connectivity statistics.
  • The logarithmic growth of mean degree with vibration time connects entanglement buildup to logarithmic aging and memory effects seen in other disordered systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the universality holds, mechanical failure of granular tangles—such as the peak in vertical cluster length at the threshold—could be predicted from percolation observables before any force-chain calculation, simplifying the design of load-bearing entangled structures.
  • Editorial inference: the Hopf-link criterion is defined on closed circles, so a direct test is to build networks from force-transmitting contacts at large opening angles; deviations would show where topological percolation stops being mechanical percolation.
  • Editorial inference: the ring-model equivalence suggests that other systems held together by topological links—kinetoplast DNA networks, mechanically interlocked polymers, and entangled robot collectives—may share these universal connectivity statistics even when their microscopic dynamics differ.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies C-shaped granular particles under vertical vibration and constructs 'entanglement networks' by declaring two particles linked when the circles completing their centerlines form a Hopf link (Eq. 5). Cluster statistics are measured in experiments (by lifting) and DEM simulations. The authors observe that the largest-cluster fraction grows with shaking time while the susceptibility peaks, identifying a percolation transition in the mean degree <k>. They introduce a continuum percolation (CP) model of randomly placed infinitely thin rings with the same Hopf-link rule, derive its excluded volume analytically as pi D^3/3, and obtain its threshold and critical exponents from Monte Carlo finite-size scaling. They report parameter-free collapses of in-container C-particle S1(<k>) and chi(<k>) onto the ring CP curves, plus similar clustering coefficients, adjacency spectra, and cluster-size distributions, and an approximate FSS collapse of DEM networks using a ring-CP-calibrated effective density. The paper concludes that the C-particle networks belong to the standard 3D percolation universality class and that opening angle mainly changes mechanical bond survival.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper is a striking demonstration that a purely geometric null model—random rings connected by Hopf links—captures the structure of entangled granular networks, with implications for granular metamaterials, entangled robotic swarms, and network-based analysis of nonconvex granular matter. Strengths include the large experimental dataset, controlled DEM simulations, a clean Monte Carlo realization of the ring CP model, parameter-free in-container comparisons for S1 and chi, and a useful analytic excluded-volume calculation for rings. The claimed universality with 3D percolation is plausible for small opening angles but is not fully established, because the C-particle FSS is calibrated through the ring CP model and the topological edge definition is only validated mechanically for small theta.

major comments (2)
  1. [Entanglement criterion (Methods, Eq. 5); Fig. 1j and Fig. 3a,b] The Hopf-link criterion in Eq. (5) is exact for closed rings, but the manuscript applies it to open C-particles and itself states that it 'well approximates their mechanical interlocking, especially when theta is small.' The paper also reports that lifted clusters disintegrate for theta >= 115 deg (Fig. 1j). Nevertheless, Fig. 3a,b and the k1/2-versus-theta inset include theta = 98 deg, and Fig. 2d includes simulation data up to theta = 151 deg. Because the ring CP model uses the same Eq. (5) on closed rings, the collapse of C-particle networks onto the ring CP curve at large theta could reflect the shared topological proxy rather than genuine mechanical interlocking. Please quantify the correspondence between Eq. (5) links and force-bearing interlocking contacts for theta > roughly 70 deg (e.g., by checking which Hopf links survive during lifting or transmit tensile force in DEM), or ex
  2. [Finite-size scaling, Eq. (3)-(4), Fig. 4e,f] The FSS analysis for C-particle networks is not an independent test of the universality class. eta_eff is defined by inverting the empirical ring-CP relation eta = p1<k> + p2<k>^p3 (Fig. 4a, Supp. Table 2), and the granular data are then collapsed using the ring-CP threshold eta_c = 2.11 and exponents beta = 0.41, gamma = 1.80, nu-bar = 2.64. This establishes consistency with the ring CP scaling functions, but it cannot by itself show that the C-particle networks belong to the 3D percolation universality class. The reported collapse is also only 'reasonably good' and is imperfect for eta_eff > eta_c. I request an independent analysis: for example, perform FSS directly in <k> without the eta_eff mapping, or fit beta, gamma, and nu-bar to the DEM data and report confidence intervals. If the exponents are fixed a priori, the claim should be weakened to 'consistent with' rather than 'belongs
minor comments (5)
  1. [Evolution of the degree distribution, Eq. (2)] The logarithmic growth law <k>(t) = k0 + alpha ln(1 + t/t0) is described in the text as purely empirical. The manuscript should be careful not to imply a mechanistic explanation for logarithmic aging in the abstract or discussion, since no microscopic derivation is offered.
  2. [Results: experimental trials] The text states that the experimental procedure was repeated in 578 trials, while the Extended Data Fig. 1 caption reports 543 experimental trials. Please reconcile these numbers and clarify which trials are included in the averages.
  3. [Fig. 3g and Extended Data Fig. 6] The claim that n_s ~ s^-2.19 is currently based on a visual comparison with a reference line. Please provide a quantitative exponent estimate (e.g., maximum-likelihood fit with uncertainty) for the DEM, experimental, and ring CP cluster-size distributions, particularly near <k> ~ 2.1.
  4. [Notation, Eq. (5)] The symbol k is used both for the node degree and for the vector k = n_i x n_j in Eq. (5). Please distinguish the two, for example by using boldface for vectors.
  5. [Finite-size scaling, Fig. 4] The granular FSS uses only N = 500, 1400, and 4000 for one opening angle (theta = 20 deg). It would be helpful to state explicitly whether larger N were attempted for the DEM system and to discuss the limited N range as a caveat when interpreting the quality of the collapse.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ring CP model is an independent null model and the FSS test uses external exponents and an explicitly defined coordinate mapping, so the central comparison is not equivalent to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that C-particle entanglement networks under vibration undergo a percolation transition described by a continuum percolation (CP) model of rings. The ring CP model is independently implemented in Monte Carlo simulations with randomly positioned and oriented rings, and its connectivity is defined by the same topological Hopf-link criterion (Eq. 5) used to detect links in the DEM simulations. This shared criterion is a modeling assumption, not a fitted parameter: the model's percolation threshold (ηc = 2.11) and critical exponents (β = 0.41, γ = 1.80, ν̄ = 2.64) are determined from the ring CP model and from standard 3D percolation literature, not from the C-particle data. The comparison of S1(⟨k⟩), χ(⟨k⟩), clustering, spectra, and cluster-size distributions therefore tests whether the measured network statistics of C-particles match an independent geometric null model; agreement is not forced by construction. The finite-size scaling for C-particles uses ηeff(⟨k⟩; N), defined as the ring-CP density that reproduces the measured mean degree. This is an explicit coordinate transformation based on the independently simulated η(⟨k⟩; N) calibration of the ring CP model, not a fit to the C-particle collapse. The collapse quality depends on the measured cluster sizes S1, S2, and χ, so it can fail and is honestly reported as imperfect in the dense regime (ηeff > ηc). The paper also explicitly acknowledges the main limitation: the Hopf-link criterion is approximate for open C-particles, especially at large opening angles, and the cluster-lifting data show mechanical bonds degrade for θ ≥ 115°. This is a validity concern about the link definition, not circularity. No load-bearing self-citation appears in the derivation chain; the Hopf-link criterion is attributed to prior work by Hoell and Löwen, and the critical exponents come from standard references. The central derivation is therefore self-contained and not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Everything beyond standard percolation inputs: six fitted or hand-set numbers, none of which enters the analytic excluded volume or the ring CP threshold determination, plus the entanglement criterion and the DEM matching as domain assumptions. The central claim therefore rests on a moderate number of upstream choices, with the ηeff calibration being the most load-bearing for the universality-class statement.

free parameters (6)
  • k0(θ) = varies with θ (Extended Data Fig. 3a-c)
    Offset parameter in Eq. (2) fitting ⟨k⟩(t) = k0 + α ln(1 + t/t0).
  • t0(θ) = varies with θ (Extended Data Fig. 3a-c)
    Time scale parameter in Eq. (2), fitted to each θ separately.
  • α = approximately constant across θ, value from fits in Extended Data Fig. 3
    Logarithmic slope in Eq. (2); fitted to ⟨k⟩(t) data, claimed to be relatively independent of θ.
  • p1, p2, p3 = listed in Supplementary Table 2
    Coefficients of the empirical fit η = p1⟨k⟩ + p2⟨k⟩^{p3} for the ring CP model; used to define ηeff for C-particle finite-size scaling.
  • DEM friction coefficient μ = 0.4
    Set for both particle-particle and particle-container contacts; influences link formation and cluster stability but is not measured from experiment.
  • Experimental small-cluster cutoff = 3.5 g
    Clusters below this weight are neglected in the experimental analysis; chosen because their sizes are sensitive to hooking, but it truncates the measured cluster-size distribution.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Standard percolation theory relations and critical exponents for 3D percolation (β=0.41, γ=1.80, ν̄=2.64, τ=2.19) from refs [22,43] are assumed and applied to the ring CP model and C-particle networks.
    Used in Results (cluster size distribution, finite-size scaling) and Methods to interpret S1, χ, ns and to test data collapses.
  • domain assumption Two particles are entangled if and only if their centerline circles form a Hopf link, Eq. (5), adopted from Ref [19].
    Defines every edge in the C-particle networks and the connectivity rule in the ring CP model; justified only by the claim that it approximates mechanical interlocking.
  • domain assumption C-shaped particles at all opening angles can be approximated by infinitely thin random rings for the continuum percolation model.
    All comparisons to the ring CP model treat particles as closed circular rings of diameter D, ignoring finite thickness and the opening gap.
  • ad hoc to paper The empirical relation η = p1⟨k⟩ + p2⟨k⟩^{p3} measured in the ring CP model (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Table 2) applies to C-particle networks when converting measured ⟨k⟩ to ηeff.
    Introduced solely to make the finite-size scaling comparison in Fig. 4e-f; the paper notes C-particles have correlated positions and orientations, unlike the random rings, so this mapping is not grounded in an independently validated theory.
  • domain assumption The DEM simulation with friction coefficient 0.4 and the specified contact model reproduces the experimental system.
    Simulation is used as the ground truth for network properties because particle positions and links cannot be measured in the experiment; matching is by setting amplitude, peak acceleration, and time unit to experimental values.
  • domain assumption Ignoring clusters smaller than 3.5 g in experiments does not affect S1 and χ.
    The paper asserts this without a sensitivity analysis; a cutoff on cluster sizes can bias the cluster-size distribution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Percolation transition in entangled granular networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K52FMTIE

@misc{pith2026250900216,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Percolation transition in entangled granular networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K52FMTIE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00216}
}
read the original abstract

Highly nonconvex granular particles, such as staples and metal shavings, can form solid-like cohesive structures through geometric entanglement (interlocking). The network structure formed by this entanglement, however, remains largely unexplored. Here we utilize network science to investigate the entanglement networks of C-shaped granular particles under vibration through experiments and simulations. By analyzing key network properties, we demonstrate that these networks undergo a percolation transition as the number of links increases logarithmically over time; the entangled particles form a giant cluster when the number of links exceeds a critical threshold. We propose a continuum percolation model of rings that effectively describes the observed transition. Additionally, we find that particle's opening angle significantly affects mechanical bonding and, consequently, the network structure. This work highlights the potential of network-based approaches to study entangled materials, paving the way for advancements in applications ranging from mechanical metamaterials to entangled robot swarms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.00216 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Andreotti, Y

    B. Andreotti, Y. Forterre, and O. Pouliquen, Granular Media: Between Fluid and Solid(Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Kamrin, K

    K. Kamrin, K. M. Hill, D. I. Goldman, and J. E. An- drade, Advances in Modeling Dense Granular Media, An- nual Review of Fluid Mechanics 56, 215 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    S. V. Franklin, Geometric cohesion in granular materials, Physics Today 65, 70 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Gravish, S

    N. Gravish, S. V. Franklin, D. L. Hu, and D. I. Goldman, Entangled Granular Media, Physical Review Letters108, 208001 (2012). 8

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    R. S. Sharma and A. Sauret, Experimental models for cohesive granular materials: A review, Soft Matter , 10.1039.D4SM01324G (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    K. A. Murphy, N. Reiser, D. Choksy, C. E. Singer, and H. M. Jaeger, Freestanding loadbearing structures with Z-shaped particles, Granular Matter 18, 26 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Y. Zhao, K. Liu, M. Zheng, J. Bar´ es, K. Dierichs, A. Menges, and R. P. Behringer, Packings of 3D stars: Stability and structure, Granular Matter 18, 24 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Dierichs and A

    K. Dierichs and A. Menges, Designing architectural ma- terials: From granular form to functional granular mate- rial, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 16, 065010 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Aponte, J

    D. Aponte, J. Bar´ es, M. Renouf, E. Az´ ema, and N. Estrada, Experimental exploration of geometric cohe- sion and solid fraction in columns of highly non-convex Platonic polypods, Granular Matter 27, 27 (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    D. P. Huet, M. Jalaal, R. van Beek, D. van der Meer, and A. Wachs, Granular avalanches of entangled rigid particles, Physical Review Fluids 6, 104304 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Karapiperis, S

    K. Karapiperis, S. Monfared, R. B. de Macedo, S. Richardson, and J. E. Andrade, Stress transmission in entangled granular structures, Granular Matter 24, 91 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Gravish and D

    N. Gravish and D. I. Goldman, Entangled Granular Me- dia, in Fluids, Colloids and Soft Materials(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016) Chap. 17, pp. 341–354

    2016

  5. [13]

    Tennenbaum, Z

    M. Tennenbaum, Z. Liu, D. Hu, and A. Fernandez- Nieves, Mechanics of fire ant aggregations, Nature Mate- rials 15, 54 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    T. C. Day, S. A. Zamani-Dahaj, G. O. Bozdag, A. J. Burnetti, E. P. Bingham, P. L. Conlin, W. C. Ratcliff, and P. J. Yunker, Morphological Entanglement in Living Systems, Physical Review X 14, 011008 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Deblais, K

    A. Deblais, K. R. Prathyusha, R. Sinaasappel, H. Tu- azon, I. Tiwari, V. P. Patil, and M. S. Bhamla, Worm blobs as entangled living polymers: From topological ac- tive matter to flexible soft robot collectives, Soft Matter 19, 7057 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    bird nest

    N. Weiner, Y. Bhosale, M. Gazzola, and H. King, Mechanics of randomly packed filaments—The “bird nest” as meta-material, Journal of Applied Physics 127, 050902 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Z. Meng, H. Yan, and Y. Wang, Granular metamateri- als with dynamic bond reconfiguration, Science Advances 10, eadq7933 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Papadopoulos, M

    L. Papadopoulos, M. A. Porter, K. E. Daniels, and D. S. Bassett, Network analysis of particles and grains, Journal of Complex Networks 6, 485 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Hoell and H

    C. Hoell and H. L¨ owen, Colloidal suspensions of C- particles: Entanglement, percolation and microrheology, The Journal of Chemical Physics 144, 174901 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Michieletto, D

    D. Michieletto, D. Marenduzzo, and E. Orlandini, Is the kinetoplast DNA a percolating network of linked rings at its critical point?, Physical Biology 12, 036001 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    P. He, A. J. Katan, L. Tubiana, C. Dekker, and D. Michieletto, Single-Molecule Structure and Topology of Kinetoplast DNA Networks, Physical Review X 13, 021010 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Stauffer and A

    D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction To Percolation Theory: Second Edition, 2nd ed. (Taylor & Francis, Lon- don, 1994)

    1994

  15. [23]

    S. B. Lee, Universal behavior of the amplitude ratio of percolation susceptibilities for off-lattice percolation models, Physical Review E 53, 3319 (1996)

    1996

  16. [24]

    Y. Jung, T. Plumb-Reyes, H.-Y. G. Lin, and L. Mahade- van, Entanglement transition in random rod packings, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122, e2401868122 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Albert and A.-L

    R. Albert and A.-L. Barab´ asi, Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 47 (2002)

    2002

  18. [26]

    Penrose, Random Geometric Graphs(Oxford Univer- sity Press, 2003)

    M. Penrose, Random Geometric Graphs(Oxford Univer- sity Press, 2003)

    2003

  19. [27]

    Richard, M

    P. Richard, M. Nicodemi, R. Delannay, P. Ribi` ere, and D. Bideau, Slow relaxation and compaction of granular systems, Nature Materials 4, 121 (2005)

    2005

  20. [28]

    Farain and D

    K. Farain and D. Bonn, Predicting frictional aging from bulk relaxation measurements, Nature Communications 14, 3606 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Farain and D

    K. Farain and D. Bonn, Thermal Properties of Athermal Granular Materials, Physical Review Letters133, 028203 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    E. B. Brauns, M. L. Madaras, R. S. Coleman, C. J. Mur- phy, and M. A. Berg, Complex Local Dynamics in DNA on the Picosecond and Nanosecond Time Scales, Physical Review Letters 88, 158101 (2002)

    2002

  23. [31]

    Matan, R

    K. Matan, R. B. Williams, T. A. Witten, and S. R. Nagel, Crumpling a Thin Sheet, Physical Review Letters 88, 076101 (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    Vincent, J

    E. Vincent, J. Hammann, M. Ocio, J.-P. Bouchaud, and L. F. Cugliandolo, Slow dynamics and aging in spin glasses, in Complex Behaviour of Glassy Systems, Vol. 492, edited by M. Rub ´ ı and C. P´ erez-Vicente (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997) pp. 184–219

    1997

  25. [33]

    A. Amir, Y. Oreg, and Y. Imry, On relaxations and aging of various glasses, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 1850 (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    M. A. Lomholt, L. Lizana, R. Metzler, and T. Ambj¨ ornsson, Microscopic Origin of the Loga- rithmic Time Evolution of Aging Processes in Complex Systems, Physical Review Letters 110, 208301 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    Shohat, Y

    D. Shohat, Y. Friedman, and Y. Lahini, Logarithmic ag- ing via instability cascades in disordered systems, Nature Physics 19, 1890 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    N. C. Keim, J. D. Paulsen, Z. Zeravcic, S. Sastry, and S. R. Nagel, Memory formation in matter, Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 035002 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Sahimi, Applications Of Percolation Theory (CRC Press, London, 2014)

    M. Sahimi, Applications Of Percolation Theory (CRC Press, London, 2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    B. I. Shklovskii and A. L. Efros, Percolation Theory, in Electronic Properties of Doped Semiconductors, edited by B. I. Shklovskii and A. L. Efros (Springer, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 1984) pp. 94–136

    1984

  31. [39]

    Dall and M

    J. Dall and M. Christensen, Random geometric graphs, Physical Review E 66, 016121 (2002)

    2002

  32. [40]

    Y. B. Yi and E. Tawerghi, Geometric percolation thresholds of interpenetrating plates in three-dimensional space, Physical Review E 79, 041134 (2009)

    2009

  33. [41]

    W. Xu, X. Su, and Y. Jiao, Continuum percolation of congruent overlapping spherocylinders, Physical Review E 94, 032122 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Hage and F

    P. Hage and F. Harary, Eccentricity and centrality in networks, Social Networks 17, 57 (1995)

    1995

  35. [43]

    C. D. Lorenz and R. M. Ziff, Precise determination of the bond percolation thresholds and finite-size scaling correc- tions for the sc, fcc, and bcc lattices, Physical Review E 57, 230 (1998)

    1998

  36. [44]

    Privman, ed., Finite Size Scaling and Numerical Sim- 9 ulation of Statistical Systems, repr ed

    V. Privman, ed., Finite Size Scaling and Numerical Sim- 9 ulation of Statistical Systems, repr ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998)

    1998

  37. [45]

    Almeira, O

    N. Almeira, O. V. Billoni, and J. I. Perotti, Scaling of percolation transitions on Erd¨ os-R´ enyi networks under centrality-based attacks, Physical Review E 101, 012306 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Schmeltzer, J

    C. Schmeltzer, J. Soriano, I. M. Sokolov, and S. R¨ udiger, Percolation of spatially constrained Erd˝ os-R´ enyi net- works with degree correlations, Physical Review E 89, 012116 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    B. Kou, Y. Cao, J. Li, C. Xia, Z. Li, H. Dong, A. Zhang, J. Zhang, W. Kob, and Y. Wang, Granular materials flow like complex fluids, Nature 551, 360 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    Karapiperis and D

    K. Karapiperis and D. M. Kochmann, Prediction and control of fracture paths in disordered architected mate- rials using graph neural networks, Communications En- gineering 2, 32 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    L. F. Hart, J. E. Hertzog, P. M. Rauscher, B. W. Rawe, M. M. Tranquilli, and S. J. Rowan, Material properties and applications of mechanically interlocked polymers, Nature Reviews Materials 6, 508 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    S. R. Beeren, C. T. McTernan, and F. Schaufelberger, The mechanical bond in biological systems, Chem9, 1378 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    J. D. Schieber and M. Andreev, Entangled Polymer Dy- namics in Equilibrium and Flow Modeled Through Slip Links, Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular En- gineering 5, 367 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    Fern´ andez-Rico, M

    C. Fern´ andez-Rico, M. Chiappini, T. Yanagishima, H. de Sousa, D. G. A. L. Aarts, M. Dijkstra, and R. P. A. Dul- lens, Shaping colloidal bananas to reveal biaxial, splay- bend nematic, and smectic phases, Science 369, 950 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    J. M. Kronenfeld, L. Rother, M. A. Saccone, M. T. Du- lay, and J. M. DeSimone, Roll-to-roll, high-resolution 3D printing of shape-specific particles, Nature 627, 306 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Riedel, L

    S. Riedel, L. A. Hoffmann, L. Giomi, and D. J. Kraft, Designing highly efficient interlocking interactions in anisotropic active particles, Nature Communications 15, 5692 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Buck and J

    G. Buck and J. Simon, The spectrum of filament entan- glement complexity and an entanglement phase transi- tion, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 468, 4024 (2012)

    2012

  48. [56]

    Onsager, The Effects of Shape on the Interaction of Colloidal Particles, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 51, 627 (1949)

    L. Onsager, The Effects of Shape on the Interaction of Colloidal Particles, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 51, 627 (1949)

    1949

  49. [57]

    Ibarra-Avalos, A

    N. Ibarra-Avalos, A. Gil-Villegas, and A. Martinez Richa, Excluded volume of hard cylinders of variable aspect ra- tio, Molecular Simulation 33, 505 (2007)

    2007

  50. [58]

    Edelsbrunner and E

    H. Edelsbrunner and E. P. M¨ ucke, Three-dimensional al- pha shapes, ACM Trans. Graph. 13, 43 (1994)

    1994

  51. [59]

    Blackwell, M

    P. Blackwell, M. Edmondson-Jones, and J. Jordan, Spec- tra of adjacency matrices of random geometric graphs, Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield (2006)

    2006

  52. [60]

    C. P. Dettmann and G. Knight, Symmetric motifs in ran- dom geometric graphs, Journal of Complex Networks 6, 95 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    A. Rai, P. Shinde, and S. Jalan, Network spectra for drug-target identification in complex diseases: New guns against old foes, Applied Network Science 3, 51 (2018). METHODS Experiment methods We used C-particles made of type 304 stainless steel, which are strong enough to lif...

    2018

  54. [63]

    𝑛#𝑛! 𝑛" Motifs generating 𝜆=0𝑛!𝑛

    and a peak acceleration of 2 .5g to replicate the exper- iment. After being vibrated for a desirable time, individual clusters near the surface are lifted one by one (Supple- mentary Video 5-7). The lifting speed 0 .5√gD is equiva- lent to the speed of a particle that has fall...

  55. [100]

    If the particles were thinner, stronger frictional effects would raise the maximum θ for stability, reducing the fragile region in Fig

    In contrast, our C-particles are thicker, and thus their cohesion relies primarily on normal contact forces within topological links. If the particles were thinner, stronger frictional effects would raise the maximum θ for stability, reducing the fragile region in Fig. 1j. Evo...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.