Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 70 references

One-hour PRIMA observations could detect water ice disks around white dwarfs within 60 parsecs, giving the first far-infrared window on volatile abundances in accreted exoplanetary material.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

PRIMA far-infrared observations could detect water ice disks (44 µm feature) within 60 pc and water vapor disks within 20 pc for masses above ~10^20 g, based on synthetic spectra.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid first PRIMA feasibility forecast for WD water ice/vapor; treat the 60-pc/10^20-g detectability as an optimistic bound pending grain-size constraints. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2509.01697 v1 pith:XOU77ENM submitted 2025-09-01 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR

Detecting water ice and vapor disks originating from icy planetary bodies around white dwarfs with future PRIMA observations

Ayaka Okuya , Hideko Nomura This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR PACS 95.85.Gn97.20.Rp
keywords white dwarfsdebris diskswater icewater vaporfar-infrared spectroscopyPRIMApolluted white dwarfsplanetary volatiles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that PRIMA, a proposed far-infrared space mission, can detect water ice and water vapor in the debris disks formed when icy planets and asteroids are tidally disrupted around white dwarfs — a measurement that white-dwarf atmospheres alone cannot provide. If correct, a one-hour PRIMA exposure would reveal the 44-μm water ice feature in disks more massive than 10^20 g around white dwarfs within 60 parsecs, and five-hour exposures would catch water vapor lines around the 19 metal-polluted white dwarfs within 20 parsecs. The authors demonstrate this with a simple emission model: vapor released near the star diffuses outward and recondenses into small crystalline ice grains beyond the snow line, where the grains emit strongly at far-infrared wavelengths. A detection would give the first direct census of ice-forming volatile elements in accreted exoplanetary material, complementing the refractory-element abundances already measured in polluted white-dwarf atmospheres and linking planet composition to formation conditions.

Core claim

Water in white-dwarf debris disks is observable with the proposed PRIMA/FIRESS far-infrared instrument: the 44 μm crystalline water ice feature and water vapor rotational lines should rise above expected noise. Using a passive-disk radiative-equilibrium model calibrated to the known disk around G29-38, the paper predicts that ice disks with mass ≳ 10^20 g within 60 pc show the 44 μm feature at feature-to-noise ratio above 3 in a 1-hour exposure, and vapor disks with total gas mass ≳ 10^20 g within 20 pc show detectable water lines in a 5-hour exposure. With 19 metal-polluted white dwarfs within 20 pc and ~210 within 60 pc, PRIMA would give the first far-infrared constraints on volatile abund

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the recondensation picture plus the 44 μm ice feature. Water vapor released by tidal disruption is assumed to diffuse outward and recondense into small (1–10 μm) pure crystalline ice grains beyond the snow line (~30 solar radii), forming a passive disk that emits a strong 44 μm water-ice lattice feature; the feature-to-noise ratio (F/N) between the feature peak and the adjacent continuum floor is the detection metric. For the gas phase, the non-LTE code RADEX computes water, OH, and O rotational line fluxes from a homogeneous H2–H2O disk between the Roche limit and snow line, with the H2/H2O ratio and gas temperature as free parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The detection claim rests on recondensed water forming small crystals: the model assumes pure crystalline ice grains of 1–10 μm, and the paper's own calculation shows the 44 μm feature fades to nothing for 30 μm grains and blurs if the ice is amorphous — so if real debris-disk ice is coarser or glassy, the one-hour, 60-pc detection claim fails.

What would settle it

Once PRIMA is in service, point it at G29-38 for one hour: the model predicts the 44 μm feature at feature-to-noise ratio ≈ 30 for an ice mass of 10^20 g, so an absence at that significance falsifies the small-grain crystalline-ice scenario. Before launch, a disk-evolution calculation that grows recondensed ice to radii beyond ~10 μm before it can radiate would settle the matter equally, since the paper shows F/N drops to ~0 at 30 μm.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • PRIMA would produce the first far-infrared detections of water ice and vapor in white-dwarf debris disks, measuring volatile abundances that white-dwarf atmospheric spectroscopy cannot currently deliver.
  • A one-hour survey of the ~210 metal-polluted white dwarfs within 60 pc would set a lower limit of ~10^20 g on circumstellar ice mass across the population, not just in individual systems.
  • For the 19 polluted white dwarfs within 20 pc, five-hour exposures would probe the full observationally inferred disk-mass range (10^19–10^24 g), so non-detections would be genuinely informative about volatile content.
  • Detecting several water vapor lines spanning optically thin and thick, and LTE and non-LTE, regimes would let observers separate total disk mass from the H2/H2O ratio — two quantities that individual line fluxes alone cannot disentangle.
  • G29-38 emerges as the strategic first target: at 17.5 pc, its predicted feature-to-noise ratio of ~30 for a 10^20 g ice disk makes it the test case for the whole scenario.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A null result across the 210 candidates would itself be a measurement: it would push the recondensed ice grain size above ~10 μm or toward the amorphous phase, constraining how efficiently ice coagulates in white-dwarf disks — a process the paper does not model.
  • The same FIRESS band that carries the 44 μm ice feature also covers crystalline silicate features (23, 28, 33, 37, 43, 69 μm) and carbonate features, so a single PRIMA spectrum could simultaneously yield a mineralogical inventory and a water census of the same disk.
  • Because water line excitation depends on H2 density, PRIMA observations of water vapor would indirectly probe the molecular-hydrogen content of these disks, a quantity current observations leave unconstrained.
  • Before launch, re-fitting the archived 5–38 μm Spitzer spectrum of G29-38 with this model would either sharpen or revise the predicted 44 μm flux, telling observers how much integration time the first target really needs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates whether the future PRIMA FIRESS far-infrared spectrometer could detect circumstellar water ice and vapor disks around white dwarfs, as a way to measure volatile abundances in accreted exoplanetary material. The authors construct a simple passive-disk emission model for hot rocky dust and cold water ice, with ice masses 10^19–10^24 g and 1–10 µm crystalline ice grains, plus a non-LTE RADEX model for water vapor, OH, and O gas in an isothermal disk. They compute synthetic spectra for G29-38 and estimate feature-to-noise ratios for the 44 µm ice feature and line-to-noise ratios for vapor lines. They find that 1-hour PRIMA observations could detect 10^20 g of water ice at distances up to ~60 pc, and 5-hour high-resolution observations could detect water vapor of total mass ≳10^20 g within ~20 pc. They identify 19 and ~210 metal-polluted white dwarfs as potential targets for vapor and ice detection, respectively.

Significance. If the detectability predictions hold, this work identifies a genuinely new observational window: no current or planned facility other than PRIMA can cover the 44–62 µm ice features or the 30–100 µm water vapor rotational bands in white dwarf debris disks. The paper makes good use of public radiative-transfer tools (OpTool, RADEX), presents a transparent parameter study, and explicitly flags many of its own limitations, including the unknown grain size and the imperfect match to the G29-38 Spitzer spectrum. The target list (19 and ~210 white dwarfs) is a useful planning resource. However, the headline detection thresholds are not robust to plausible variations in ice grain size and phase, and the 10^20 g ice mass is partly anchored to a Spitzer slope fit rather than an independent physical bound. The feasibility argument is therefore directionally important but currently overstates certainty in the abstract and conclusion.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.2 and Sec. 4.1] The central ice-detectability claim—1-hour PRIMA detection of 10^20 g ice within 60 pc—rests on the assumed pure crystalline 1–10 µm grains, which are observationally unconstrained. The paper itself labels this 'the most optimistic detectability scenario' and Sec. 4.1 shows F/N drops from ~100 at 1 µm to ~0 at 30 µm, with a 1–30 µm power law only giving F/N~30. Amorphous ice would further broaden the feature. The abstract and conclusion should either state this dependence explicitly as a conditional result (e.g., 'for grain radii ≲ few µm and crystalline ice') or present a detectability map in (M_ice, a_max) space. As written, the threshold has the appearance of a firm sensitivity limit but is actually a single-scenario prediction.
  2. [Sec. 2.2, Fig. 2, Fig. 3] The 'potential lower limit of circumstellar disk mass' of 10^20 g is not independently derived: it is the mass chosen to reproduce the 24–38 µm slope of G29-38 (Sec. 2.2). The predicted F/N at 44 µm is thus an extrapolation from wavelengths where the model already does not perfectly match the Spitzer data (Sec. 3.1). This makes the quoted detectability threshold partly circular. The authors should separate the fitted G29-38 mass from the detectability calculation, or show that the 60-pc/10^20 g statement is insensitive to the calibration method.
  3. [Sec. 3.2 and abstract] The water-vapor detection threshold Mg ≳ 10^20 g within 20 pc is quoted for the fiducial f_H2 = 1 case. Figure 6 shows that for f_H2 = 0.01 the line flux decreases substantially, so the threshold no longer holds for H2-poor gas. The abstract mentions 'depending on the H2/H2O ratio', but the conclusion and Sec. 4.2 restate the 10^20 g value without that qualification. Please state the assumed f_H2 value alongside the quantitative threshold in all summary statements.
  4. [Sec. 2.4] The noise scaling σ_N ∝ (t/1hr)^-1/2 (R/100)^1/2 is an assumption about FIRESS performance that is used to bin to R=10 and to extrapolate to 5-hour exposures. The authors note that detectability should be re-evaluated once instrument specs are better defined, which is appropriate. However, because the 60-pc and 20-pc thresholds are stated to one significant figure in the abstract, the sensitivity of those thresholds to the assumed noise scaling should be quantified or the thresholds should be presented as indicative rather than precise.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.2] The sentence 'Within 60 pc, potential targets are ten times more numerous than those for gas detection, with ∼ 210 metal-polluted WDs'—210/19 ≈ 11, so 'ten times' is approximate; suggest 'roughly an order of magnitude more.'
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] Typo: 'balck' should be 'black'.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] Typo: 'Spizter' appears twice; should be 'Spitzer'.
  4. [Sec. 2.3] Minor language issue: 'we assume an gas distributed homogeneously' should be 'a gas distributed homogeneously'.
  5. [Sec. 5] The conclusion repeats the 10^20 g thresholds without the caveats from Sec. 4.1; consider adding a sentence there summarizing the grain-size dependence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: PRIMA detectability curves are forward-model sensitivity limits; the 10^20 g ice mass is a calibrated fiducial, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central feasibility claims are genuine forward-model sensitivity estimates rather than reductions of outputs to inputs. The 10^20 g ice mass used in the abstract threshold is introduced in Sec. 2.2 as a fiducial value ('For the specific case of the G29-38 icy disk, we set Mice at ~10^20 g to reproduce the slope of the spectrum at wavelengths >24 um, as observed by Spitzer'), but the 60-pc/10^20 g F/N>3 contour in Sec. 3.1 is an extrapolated instrument-sensitivity boundary computed from the model 44 um ice feature and PRIMA noise, not a re-statement of the fitted slope. The model is calibrated on G29-38's 24-38 um continuum, while the 44 um peak lies outside that fitted wavelength range, so the detection claim has independent content. Gas-line detectability is computed with RADEX while independently varying Mg, Tg, and fH2; the 20-pc/5-hour/10^20 g claim is read directly from those forward line fluxes and is not forced by any fitted parameter. Self-citations (Okuya et al. 2023; Okuya et al. submitted) supply the disk-evolution scenario and the passive-disk radiative model; they are input assumptions from prior simulations, not the target PRIMA prediction. The paper itself labels the pure-crystalline 1-10 um grain choice as 'the most optimistic detectability scenario' and Sec. 4.1 quantifies how the feature disappears for 30 um grains or broadens for amorphous ice, honestly flagging these as model uncertainties. No step in the derivation equates a predicted quantity with an input by construction, so there is no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central predictions depend on several adopted parameters (ice mass, grain size, snow line radius, gas mass, temperature, composition) and on modeling assumptions inherited from prior work. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • M_ice (water ice disk mass) = 10^20 g (fiducial for G29-38; varied 10^19-10^24 g)
    Set to reproduce the observed Spitzer spectral slope at >24 µm (Sec. 2.2); also used as the detection threshold in the abstract.
  • Ice grain size distribution = Power law a^-3.5 with a = 1-10 µm; single-size cases 0.1-30 µm
    Assumed; F/N depends strongly on grain size (Sec. 4.1).
  • M_g (gas disk mass) = 10^19-10^22 g
    Varied to explore detectability; based on observed asteroid mass range.
  • T_g (gas temperature) = 150, 300, 600 K
    Varied to cover equilibrium temperatures from snow line to Roche limit.
  • f_H2 (H2/H2O mixing ratio) = 0.01, 1, 100
    Varied because photochemistry is not modeled; affects non-LTE line excitation.
  • Snow line radius = 30 R_sun
    Assumed recondensation location (Sec. 2.1); sets the inner radius of the ice disk.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Water vapor from tidally disrupted icy bodies recondenses into an ice particle disk beyond the snow line.
    Sec. 2.1, based on the disk evolution simulation of Okuya et al. (2023), a prior paper by the first author.
  • standard math The two-layer passive disk model (Chiang et al. 2001) is sufficient for computing the SEDs of the rocky and icy disks.
    Sec. 2.2; used without modifying the vertical thermal structure.
  • domain assumption RADEX non-LTE radiative transfer applies to the assumed uniform, isothermal gas disk, and the flux can be scaled by the emitting area S/4πd².
    Sec. 2.3; the disk geometry is highly simplified and the normalization is not derived from a 2D transfer calculation.
  • domain assumption PRIMA/FIRESS sensitivity values from the mission Fact Sheet are correct to the stated level.
    Sec. 2.4; all detectability conclusions scale with these noise figures.
  • domain assumption The observed metal-polluted white dwarf population within 60 pc is representative of systems hosting icy disks with masses up to ~10^20 g.
    Sec. 4.2; used to define the 210 optimal targets for ice observation.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Detecting water ice and vapor disks originating from icy planetary bodies around white dwarfs with future PRIMA observations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XOU77ENM

@misc{pith2026250901697,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Detecting water ice and vapor disks originating from icy planetary bodies around white dwarfs with future PRIMA observations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XOU77ENM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01697}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Observations of atmospheres of polluted white dwarfs provide insights into the elemental composition of accreted exoplanets and exo-asteroids. However, they poorly constrain the abundance of ice-forming volatile elements due to the properties of white dwarf atmospheres. Instead of focusing solely on atmospheric observations, we propose observing circumstellar water ice and vapor disks formed by the tidal disruption of icy bodies using the future PRobe far-Infrared Mission for Astrophysics (PRIMA) far-infrared enhanced survey spectrometer. PRIMA has the potential to measure volatile abundances in colder circumstellar regions inaccessible by shorter-wavelength observations. We employ a simple disk emission model with disk parameter ranges inferred from previous observations and disk evolution simulations. We find the 44-$\mu$m water ice feature promising for observing icy disks. For white dwarfs within 60 pc, 1-hour PRIMA observations could detect water ice with a mass above $10^{20}$ g, representing a potential lower limit of circumstellar disk mass. Water vapor rotational lines also abundantly emerge within the PRIMA wavelength coverage, and 5-hour observations for white dwarfs within 20 pc could detect water vapor with a total disk mass $\gtrsim 10^{20}$ g, depending on the H$_2$/H$_2$O ratio. 19 metal polluted white dwarfs within 20 pc and 210 within 60 pc could be optimal targets for water vapor and ice observations, respectively.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Planetary Radii across Five Orders of Magni- tude in Mass and Stellar Insolation: Application to Transits,

    J. J. Fortney, M. S. Marley, and J. W. Barnes, “Planetary Radii across Five Orders of Magni- tude in Mass and Stellar Insolation: Application to Transits,” ApJ 659, 1661–1672 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    A Detailed Model Grid for Solid Planets from 0.1 through 100 Earth Masses,

    L. Zeng and D. Sasselov, “A Detailed Model Grid for Solid Planets from 0.1 through 100 Earth Masses,” PASP 125, 227 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Growth model interpretation of planet size distribution,

    L. Zeng, S. B. Jacobsen, D. D. Sasselov, et al., “Growth model interpretation of planet size distribution,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 116, 9723–9728 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Exoplanet Science from Kepler,

    J. J. Lissauer, N. M. Batalha, and W. J. Borucki, “Exoplanet Science from Kepler,” in Proto- stars and Planets VII, S. Inutsuka, Y . Aikawa, T. Muto,et al., Eds., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series 534, 839 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Mass-Radius Relationships for Solid Exoplanets,

    S. Seager, M. Kuchner, C. A. Hier-Majumder, et al., “Mass-Radius Relationships for Solid Exoplanets,” ApJ 669, 1279–1297 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    A Framework for Quantifying the Degeneracies of Exoplanet Interior Compositions,

    L. A. Rogers and S. Seager, “A Framework for Quantifying the Degeneracies of Exoplanet Interior Compositions,” ApJ 712, 974–991 (2010). 13

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Can we constrain the interior structure of rocky exoplan- ets from mass and radius measurements?,

    C. Dorn, A. Khan, K. Heng, et al., “Can we constrain the interior structure of rocky exoplan- ets from mass and radius measurements?,” A&A 577, A83 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Inferring the Composition of Disintegrat- ing Planet Interiors from Dust Tails with Future James Webb Space Telescope Observations,

    E. H. L. Bodman, J. T. Wright, S. J. Desch, et al., “Inferring the Composition of Disintegrat- ing Planet Interiors from Dust Tails with Future James Webb Space Telescope Observations,” AJ 156, 173 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Constraining the Bulk Composition of Disintegrat- ing Exoplanets Using Combined Transmission Spectra from JWST and SPICA,

    A. Okuya, S. Okuzumi, K. Ohno, et al., “Constraining the Bulk Composition of Disintegrat- ing Exoplanets Using Combined Transmission Spectra from JWST and SPICA,” ApJ 901, 171 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Possible Disintegrating Short-period Super- Mercury Orbiting KIC 12557548,

    S. Rappaport, A. Levine, E. Chiang, et al. , “Possible Disintegrating Short-period Super- Mercury Orbiting KIC 12557548,” ApJ 752, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    KOI-2700b—A Planet Candidate with Dusty Effluents on a 22 hr Orbit,

    S. Rappaport, T. Barclay, J. DeV ore, et al., “KOI-2700b—A Planet Candidate with Dusty Effluents on a 22 hr Orbit,” ApJ 784, 40 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    The K2-ESPRINT Project I: Discovery of the Disintegrating Rocky Planet K2-22b with a Cometary Head and Leading Tail,

    R. Sanchis-Ojeda, S. Rappaport, E. Pall `e, et al., “The K2-ESPRINT Project I: Discovery of the Disintegrating Rocky Planet K2-22b with a Cometary Head and Leading Tail,” ApJ 812, 112 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Diffusion Coefficients for Stellar Plasmas,

    C. Paquette, C. Pelletier, G. Fontaine, et al., “Diffusion Coefficients for Stellar Plasmas,” ApJS 61, 177 (1986)

    work page 1986

  14. [14]

    Metal Lines in DA White Dwarfs,

    B. Zuckerman, D. Koester, I. N. Reid, et al., “Metal Lines in DA White Dwarfs,” ApJ 596, 477–495 (2003)

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    Ancient Planetary Systems are Orbiting a Large Fraction of White Dwarf Stars,

    B. Zuckerman, C. Melis, B. Klein, et al., “Ancient Planetary Systems are Orbiting a Large Fraction of White Dwarf Stars,” ApJ 722, 725–736 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    The frequency of planetary debris around young white dwarfs,

    D. Koester, B. T. G ¨ansicke, and J. Farihi, “The frequency of planetary debris around young white dwarfs,” A&A 566, A34 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Are There Unstable Planetary Systems around White Dwarfs?,

    J. H. Debes and S. Sigurdsson, “Are There Unstable Planetary Systems around White Dwarfs?,” ApJ 572, 556–565 (2002)

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Dynamical effects of stellar mass-loss on a Kuiper-like belt,

    A. Bonsor, A. J. Mustill, and M. C. Wyatt, “Dynamical effects of stellar mass-loss on a Kuiper-like belt,” MNRAS 414, 930–939 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Extrasolar Cosmochemistry,

    M. Jura and E. D. Young, “Extrasolar Cosmochemistry,” Annual Review of Earth and Plane- tary Sciences 42, 45–67 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    From stellar nebula to planetesimals,

    U. Marboeuf, A. Thiabaud, Y . Alibert, et al., “From stellar nebula to planetesimals,” A&A 570, A35 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Molecular abundances and C/O ratios in chemically evolving planet-forming disk midplanes,

    C. Eistrup, C. Walsh, and E. F. van Dishoeck, “Molecular abundances and C/O ratios in chemically evolving planet-forming disk midplanes,” A&A 613, A14 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    Polluted white dwarfs: constraints on the origin and geology of exoplanetary material,

    J. H. D. Harrison, A. Bonsor, and N. Madhusudhan, “Polluted white dwarfs: constraints on the origin and geology of exoplanetary material,” MNRAS 479, 3814–3841 (2018). 14

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    DB white dwarfs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 10 and 12,

    D. Koester and S. O. Kepler, “DB white dwarfs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 10 and 12,” A&A 583, A86 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Trace hydrogen in helium atmosphere white dwarfs as a possible signature of water accretion,

    N. P. Gentile Fusillo, B. T. G ¨ansicke, J. Farihi, et al., “Trace hydrogen in helium atmosphere white dwarfs as a possible signature of water accretion,” MNRAS 468, 971–980 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Evidence for Water in the Rocky Debris of a Disrupted Extrasolar Minor Planet,

    J. Farihi, B. T. G ¨ansicke, and D. Koester, “Evidence for Water in the Rocky Debris of a Disrupted Extrasolar Minor Planet,” Science 342, 218–220 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    PEWDD: A database of white dwarfs enriched by exo-planetary material

    J. Williams, B. Gaensicke, A. Swan, et al., “PEWDD: A database of white dwarfs enriched by exo-planetary material,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2409.16046 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Unstable low-mass planetary systems as drivers of white dwarf pollution,

    A. J. Mustill, E. Villaver, D. Veras, et al., “Unstable low-mass planetary systems as drivers of white dwarf pollution,” MNRAS 476, 3939–3955 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    A Tidally Disrupted Asteroid around the White Dwarf G29-38,

    M. Jura, “A Tidally Disrupted Asteroid around the White Dwarf G29-38,”ApJ 584, L91–L94 (2003)

    work page 2003

  29. [29]

    Formation of planetary debris discs around white dwarfs - I. Tidal disruption of an extremely eccentric asteroid,

    D. Veras, Z. M. Leinhardt, A. Bonsor, et al., “Formation of planetary debris discs around white dwarfs - I. Tidal disruption of an extremely eccentric asteroid,” MNRAS 445, 2244– 2255 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Formation of planetary debris discs around white dwarfs - II. Shrinking extremely eccentric collisionless rings,

    D. Veras, Z. M. Leinhardt, S. Eggl, et al. , “Formation of planetary debris discs around white dwarfs - II. Shrinking extremely eccentric collisionless rings,” MNRAS 451, 3453– 3459 (2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Accretion of tidally disrupted asteroids on to white dwarfs: direct accretion versus disc processing,

    D. Li, A. J. Mustill, and M. B. Davies, “Accretion of tidally disrupted asteroids on to white dwarfs: direct accretion versus disc processing,” MNRAS 508, 5671–5686 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Tidal disruption of planetary bodies by white dwarfs I: a hybrid SPH-analytical approach,

    U. Malamud and H. B. Perets, “Tidal disruption of planetary bodies by white dwarfs I: a hybrid SPH-analytical approach,” MNRAS 492, 5561–5581 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Tidal disruption of planetary bodies by white dwarfs - II. Debris disc structure and ejected interstellar asteroids,

    U. Malamud and H. B. Perets, “Tidal disruption of planetary bodies by white dwarfs - II. Debris disc structure and ejected interstellar asteroids,” MNRAS 493, 698–712 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    A road-map to white dwarf pollution: tidal disruption, eccentric grind-down, and dust accretion,

    M. G. Brouwers, A. Bonsor, and U. Malamud, “A road-map to white dwarf pollution: tidal disruption, eccentric grind-down, and dust accretion,” MNRAS 509, 2404–2422 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Excess infrared radiation from a white dwarf—an orbiting brown dwarf?,

    B. Zuckerman and E. E. Becklin, “Excess infrared radiation from a white dwarf—an orbiting brown dwarf?,” Nature 330, 138–140 (1987)

    work page 1987

  36. [36]

    Externally Polluted White Dwarfs with Dust Disks,

    M. Jura, J. Farihi, and B. Zuckerman, “Externally Polluted White Dwarfs with Dust Disks,” ApJ 663, 1285–1290 (2007)

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    A Gaseous Metal Disk Around a White Dwarf,

    B. T. G ¨ansicke, T. R. Marsh, J. Southworth, et al., “A Gaseous Metal Disk Around a White Dwarf,” Science 314, 1908 (2006)

    work page 1908

  38. [38]

    The frequency and infrared brightness of circumstellar discs at white dwarfs,

    M. Rocchetto, J. Farihi, B. T. G ¨ansicke, et al., “The frequency and infrared brightness of circumstellar discs at white dwarfs,” MNRAS 449, 574–587 (2015). 15

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Doppler imaging of the planetary debris disc at the white dwarf SDSS J122859.93+104032.9,

    C. J. Manser, B. T. G ¨ansicke, T. R. Marsh, et al., “Doppler imaging of the planetary debris disc at the white dwarf SDSS J122859.93+104032.9,” MNRAS 455, 4467–4478 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Modelling the evolution of silicate/volatile accretion discs around white dwarfs,

    A. Okuya, S. Ida, R. Hyodo, et al., “Modelling the evolution of silicate/volatile accretion discs around white dwarfs,” MNRAS 519, 1657–1676 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Optical constants of ice from the ultraviolet to the mi- crowave: A revised compilation,

    S. G. Warren and R. E. Brandt, “Optical constants of ice from the ultraviolet to the mi- crowave: A revised compilation,” Journal of Geophysical Research (Atmospheres) 113, D14220 (2008)

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    The hitran 2004 molecular spectroscopic database,

    L. Rothman, D. Jacquemart, A. Barbe, et al. , “The hitran 2004 molecular spectroscopic database,” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 96(2), 139–204 (2005)

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    An atomic and molecular database for analysis of submillimetre line observations,

    F. L. Sch ¨oier, F. F. S. van der Tak, E. F. van Dishoeck, et al., “An atomic and molecular database for analysis of submillimetre line observations,” A&A 432, 369–379 (2005)

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    The HITRAN2020 molecular spectro- scopic database,

    I. E. Gordon, L. S. Rothman, R. J. Hargreaves, et al., “The HITRAN2020 molecular spectro- scopic database,” J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf. 277, 107949 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    The Dust Cloud around the White Dwarf G 29-38. II. Spectrum from 5 to 40 µm and Mid-Infrared Photometric Variability,

    W. T. Reach, C. Lisse, T. von Hippel, et al., “The Dust Cloud around the White Dwarf G 29-38. II. Spectrum from 5 to 40 µm and Mid-Infrared Photometric Variability,” ApJ 693, 697–712 (2009)

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    Infrared Emission from the Dusty Disk Orbiting GD 362, an Externally Polluted White Dwarf,

    M. Jura, J. Farihi, B. Zuckerman, et al., “Infrared Emission from the Dusty Disk Orbiting GD 362, an Externally Polluted White Dwarf,” AJ 133, 1927–1933 (2007)

    work page 1927

  47. [47]

    Six White Dwarfs with Circumstellar Silicates,

    M. Jura, J. Farihi, and B. Zuckerman, “Six White Dwarfs with Circumstellar Silicates,” AJ 137, 3191–3197 (2009)

    work page 2009

  48. [48]

    PRIMA General Observer Science Book,

    A. Moullet, T. Kataria, D. Lis, et al., “PRIMA General Observer Science Book,” arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2310.20572 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    The far-infrared enhanced survey spectrometer (FIRESS) for PRIMA: approach and estimated performance,

    C. M. Bradford, et al., “The far-infrared enhanced survey spectrometer (FIRESS) for PRIMA: approach and estimated performance,”J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst.11(3), 031627 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Steps toward interstellar silicate mineralogy. VI. Dependence of crystalline olivine IR spectra on iron content and particle shape,

    D. Fabian, T. Henning, C. J ¨ager, et al., “Steps toward interstellar silicate mineralogy. VI. Dependence of crystalline olivine IR spectra on iron content and particle shape,” A&A 378, 228–238 (2001)

    work page 2001

  51. [51]

    Steps toward interstellar silicate mineralogy. IV . The crystalline revolution,

    C. Jaeger, F. J. Molster, J. Dorschner, et al., “Steps toward interstellar silicate mineralogy. IV . The crystalline revolution,” A&A 339, 904–916 (1998)

    work page 1998

  52. [52]

    Compositional dependence of infrared absorp- tion spectra of crystalline silicate. II. Natural and synthetic olivines,

    C. Koike, H. Chihara, A. Tsuchiyama, et al., “Compositional dependence of infrared absorp- tion spectra of crystalline silicate. II. Natural and synthetic olivines,” A&A 399, 1101–1107 (2003)

    work page 2003

  53. [53]

    The first white dwarf debris disc observed by JWST,

    A. Swan, J. Farihi, K. Y . L. Su,et al., “The first white dwarf debris disc observed by JWST,” MNRAS 529, L41–L46 (2024). 16

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Carbonates in Space: The Challenge of Low- Temperature Data,

    T. Posch, A. Baier, H. Mutschke, et al. , “Carbonates in Space: The Challenge of Low- Temperature Data,”ApJ 668, 993–1000 (2007)

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    Frequencies of Warm Debris Disks Based on Point Source Catalogs of Spitzer, WISE, and Gaia,

    T. Mizuki, M. Momose, M. Aizawa, et al., “Frequencies of Warm Debris Disks Based on Point Source Catalogs of Spitzer, WISE, and Gaia,” AJ 167, 275 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Post-main-sequence planetary system evolution,

    D. Veras, “Post-main-sequence planetary system evolution,” Royal Society Open Science 3, 150571 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    The Geometry of the G29-38 White Dwarf Dust Disk from Radiative Transfer Modeling,

    N. P. Ballering, C. I. Levens, K. Y . L. Su,et al., “The Geometry of the G29-38 White Dwarf Dust Disk from Radiative Transfer Modeling,”ApJ 939, 108 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    A Dusty Component to the Gaseous Debris Disk Around the White Dwarf SDSS J1228+1040,

    C. S. Brinkworth, B. T. G ¨ansicke, T. R. Marsh, et al., “A Dusty Component to the Gaseous Debris Disk Around the White Dwarf SDSS J1228+1040,” ApJ 696, 1402–1406 (2009)

    work page 2009

  59. [59]

    The gaseous debris disk of the white dwarf SDSS J1228+1040. HST/COS search for far-ultraviolet signatures,

    S. Hartmann, T. Nagel, T. Rauch, et al., “The gaseous debris disk of the white dwarf SDSS J1228+1040. HST/COS search for far-ultraviolet signatures,” A&A 593, A67 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Spectral Energy Distributions of Passive T Tauri and Herbig Ae Disks: Grain Mineralogy, Parameter Dependences, and Com- parison with Infrared Space Observatory LWS Observations,

    E. I. Chiang, M. K. Joung, M. J. Creech-Eakman, et al., “Spectral Energy Distributions of Passive T Tauri and Herbig Ae Disks: Grain Mineralogy, Parameter Dependences, and Com- parison with Infrared Space Observatory LWS Observations,”ApJ 547, 1077–1089 (2001)

    work page 2001

  61. [61]

    OpTool: Command-line driven tool for creating com- plex dust opacities

    C. Dominik, M. Min, and R. Tazaki, “OpTool: Command-line driven tool for creating com- plex dust opacities.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2104.010 (2021)

    2021

  62. [62]

    Molecular ices as temperature indicators for interstellar dust: the 44- and 62- µm lattice features of H 2O ice.,

    R. G. Smith, G. Robinson, A. R. Hyland, et al., “Molecular ices as temperature indicators for interstellar dust: the 44- and 62- µm lattice features of H 2O ice.,” MNRAS 271, 481–489 (1994)

    work page 1994

  63. [63]

    A computer program for fast non-LTE analysis of interstellar line spectra. With diagnostic plots to interpret observed line intensity ratios,

    F. F. S. van der Tak, J. H. Black, F. L. Sch¨oier, et al., “A computer program for fast non-LTE analysis of interstellar line spectra. With diagnostic plots to interpret observed line intensity ratios,” A&A 468, 627–635 (2007)

    work page 2007

  64. [64]

    PRIMA Instruments

    PRIMA Team, “PRIMA Instruments.” https://prima.ipac.caltech.edu/page/ instruments. Accessed: 2024-12-31

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    The Solar Neighborhood. XXXIX. Parallax Results from the CTIOPI and NOFS Programs: 50 New Members of the 25 parsec White Dwarf Sample,

    J. P. Subasavage, W.-C. Jao, T. J. Henry, et al., “The Solar Neighborhood. XXXIX. Parallax Results from the CTIOPI and NOFS Programs: 50 New Members of the 25 parsec White Dwarf Sample,” AJ 154, 32 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    CASSIS: The Cornell Atlas of Spitzer/Infrared Spectrograph Sources,

    V . Lebouteiller, D. J. Barry, H. W. W. Spoon, et al. , “CASSIS: The Cornell Atlas of Spitzer/Infrared Spectrograph Sources,” ApJS 196, 8 (2011)

    work page 2011

  67. [67]

    The Montreal White Dwarf Database: A Tool for the Community,

    P. Dufour, S. Blouin, S. Coutu, et al., “The Montreal White Dwarf Database: A Tool for the Community,” in 20th European White Dwarf Workshop, P. E. Tremblay, B. Gaensicke, and T. Marsh, Eds., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series509, 3 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Subtle and Spectacular: Diverse White Dwarf Debris Disks Revealed by JWST,

    J. Farihi, K. Y . L. Su, C. Melis, et al., “Subtle and Spectacular: Diverse White Dwarf Debris Disks Revealed by JWST,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.18338 (2025). 17

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment,

    J. D. Hunter, “Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment,” Computing in Science & Engineer- ing 9, 90–95 (2007)

    work page 2007

  70. [70]

    Gnuplot 6.0: an interactive plotting program

    T. Williams, C. Kelley, and many others, “Gnuplot 6.0: an interactive plotting program.” http://www.gnuplot.info (2024). Ayaka Okuya is a JSPS Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. She received her PhD in earth and planetary sciences from the Institute of Science Tokyo in 2022. Her research focuses on exoplanet pr...

    work page 2024

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.