Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 38 references

A parity-projected QCD sum-rule calculation predicts that several doubly charmed pentaquark molecular states with strangeness 0 and -1 lie below their meson-baryon thresholds and would be bound states.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Parity-projected QCD sum rules predict that several doubly charmed pentaquark molecular states lie below their meson-baryon mass thresholds, including triply charged states with no ordinary baryon counterpart.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A clean proceedings summary of the authors' own sum-rule results, but the S=0 bound-state claims are weaker than the abstract implies; the S=-1 rows are the substantive part. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.01965 v1 pith:OEGT2RJ2 submitted 2025-09-02 hep-ph

Doubly charmed pentaquark states with strangeness $S=0, -1$

Wei Chen , Feng-Bo Duan , Zi-Yan Yang , Qi-Nan Wang , Xu-Liang Chen , Qian Wang This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords doubly charmed pentaquarksQCD sum rulesparity projectionhadronic moleculesexotic hadronsP_cc statesstrange pentaquarksoperator product expansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using parity-projected QCD sum rules, this paper tries to establish that a class of doubly charmed pentaquarks—states made of two charm quarks and three light quarks, arranged as charmed meson–charmed baryon molecules—exist as bound states. For strangeness S=0 it predicts that the Lambda_c D(1/2-), Sigma_c D(1/2-), Sigma_c D*(3/2-), Lambda*_c D(3/2-), Lambda*_c D*(5/2-), Sigma_c D(1/2+), Sigma_c D*(3/2+), and Sigma*_c D(3/2+) states lie below their two-hadron thresholds, with masses near 4.08–4.69 GeV. For S=-1 it predicts the Xi_c D*(1/2-), Xi'_c D*(3/2-), Xi*_c D*(1/2-), Xi*_cc Kbar*(1/2-,5/2-), and Omega*_cc rho(1/2-,5/2-) states below threshold, near 4.20–4.56 GeV. If these predictions are right, exotic hadrons with two open charm quarks form a family, including triply charged and neutral members that cannot mix with ordinary doubly charmed baryons and would be unmistakable experimental signals.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the parity-projected QCD sum rule applied to a set of molecular interpolating currents yields pentaquark masses below the corresponding meson-baryon thresholds in a large set of channels. The authors construct currents for Lambda_c D, Sigma_c D, Sigma_c D*, Lambda*_c D, Lambda*_c D*, Sigma*_c D, Sigma*_c D* and their strange analogues, compute the two-point correlation functions through dimension-10 condensates, and use parity projection to separate negative- and positive-parity contributions. The resulting masses, stable in the chosen s0 and Borel windows, fall below threshold for eight S=0 states and for the S=-1 states Xi_c D*, Xi'_c D*,

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the parity-projected QCD sum rule. Each interpolating current—a product of quark fields with the flavor content of a charmed meson and a charmed baryon—couples to both negative- and positive-parity states. By forming the two-point correlation function and separating its hadronic spectral density into parts even and odd in sqrt(s), the method converts one correlation function into separate mass predictions for J^P = 1/2±, 3/2±, and 5/2± states. The mass formula (Eq. 15) is a ratio of Borel-transformed moments, with the operator product expansion carried to dimension-10 condensates; the parity projection is what lets the paper assign definite spin-parity to each predic

Load-bearing premise

The extraction in Eq. (15) assumes each current couples to a single narrow pole whose mass the Borel window isolates; if the window is actually averaging over a two-hadron continuum, the predicted masses—especially the S=0 channels with bindings of a few tens of MeV against ~0.1 GeV errors—are not physical.

What would settle it

A high-statistics hadron-collider search for the triply charged P_ccc++ in Sigma_c^{++}D^{(*)+} or Xi_cc^{++}pi^+ final states, and for the neutral P_cc0 in the charge-conjugate channels, would settle the claim: the absence of narrow peaks in the 4.1–4.7 GeV region would rule out the predicted bound-state family. A lattice-QCD calculation of Lambda_c D scattering in the 1/2- channel would independently test the marginal S=0 binding.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the predictions hold, a family of doubly charmed pentaquark bound states exists with masses near 4.08–4.69 GeV for S=0 and 4.20–4.56 GeV for S=-1.
  • The triply charged P_ccc++ (ccuu dbar) and neutral P_cc0 (ccdd ubar) states cannot mix with ordinary doubly charmed baryons, so a peak in their predicted decay channels would be a clear exotic-hadron signal.
  • The S=-1 states add strange doubly charmed pentaquarks to the expected spectrum, giving targets for strange-charmed final states in heavy-quark decays.
  • The parity projection yields both negative- and positive-parity partners from the same currents, so the tables provide testable mass splittings and spin-parity assignments for future observations.
  • Confirmation would support the hadronic-molecule interpretation of multiquark exotics, extending the pattern seen in hidden-charm pentaquarks and the doubly charmed tetraquark T_cc.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the sharpest test is not a single mass but the pattern—if several of the predicted near-threshold channels show peaks, the molecular interpretation is strongly supported even if individual masses shift by tens of MeV.
  • Editorial inference: the S=-1 channels have binding energies of roughly 100–240 MeV, which exceed the quoted ~50 MeV uncertainties by more than the marginal S=0 channels do, so the strange states are the ones a first search should prioritize.
  • Editorial inference: the same parity-projected currents could be used to compute decay widths and transition amplitudes, turning these mass predictions into line-shape predictions testable in hadron-collider data.
  • Editorial inference: lattice-QCD calculations of Lambda_c D and Sigma_c D scattering lengths in the 1/2- channel would independently settle whether the marginal S=0 bindings are real.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies doubly charmed pentaquark molecular states with strangeness S=0 and S=-1 using parity-projected QCD sum rules. It constructs interpolating currents for the Lambda_c^{(*)} D^{(*)}, Sigma_c^{(*)} D^{(*)}, Xi_c^{('*)} D^{(*)}, Xi_cc^{(*)} Kbar^{(*)}, and Omega_cc^{(*)} pi/rho channels, computes the OPE up to dimension-10 condensates, and extracts masses from the parity-projected sum rule of Eq. (15). The predicted masses are compared with external two-hadron thresholds, and the paper claims that several negative- and positive-parity states lie below threshold, implying bound doubly charmed pentaquarks. The most distinctive predictions are the triply charged P_cc+++ and neutral P_cc0 states in the Sigma_c^{(*)} D^{(*)} family.

Significance. If the predictions hold, the paper identifies a new family of doubly charmed pentaquark bound states, including exotic flavor/charge states that should be experimentally searchable. The parity-projected QCD sum rule framework is established, and the threshold comparison uses independent external inputs, so the central logic is not circular. The S=-1 results (Table 3) show bindings of 100-240 MeV against ~50 MeV uncertainties and are the most robust part of the paper. However, the S=0 bound-state claim is substantially weaker than the text and abstract suggest, because several advertised channels have binding energies smaller than the quoted sum-rule errors.

major comments (3)
  1. [Tables 1-2, Section 3] The S=0 bound-state claims are not supported at the quoted precision. For Lambda_c D(1/2-) in Table 1, the mass is 4.13^{+0.10}_{-0.09} GeV versus a 4.15 GeV threshold, i.e., a 20 MeV binding against a ~100 MeV error. For Sigma_c D(1/2+) in Table 2, the margin is 30 MeV against a ~110 MeV error, and for Sigma_c D*(3/2+) and Sigma*_c D(3/2+) the central masses exactly equal the thresholds. The sentence in Section 3 that these states are 'lower than their meson-baryon mass thresholds' is therefore an overstatement. The authors should either provide a significance estimate that accounts for threshold uncertainties, or restrict the bound-state claim to channels with binding larger than the combined uncertainty.
  2. [Eqs. (9), (15), Section 3] No test of the narrow-resonance single-pole approximation is shown for the claimed states. When the extracted mass coincides with a two-hadron threshold, the spectral function of Eq. (9) could be dominated by the two-hadron continuum rather than a genuine pole. The paper states that OPE convergence, pole contribution, and Borel stability were used to choose s0 and M_B^2, but only one Borel curve for one channel is displayed (Fig. 1). Please provide pole-dominance and continuum-suppression checks for each channel, especially the marginal S=0 rows, or discuss why a continuum artifact is excluded.
  3. [Tables 1-3] The meson-baryon thresholds are quoted without uncertainties. The thresholds are sums of external PDG masses, whose errors propagate into the mass-threshold difference. For channels like Lambda_c D(1/2-) and Sigma_c D(1/2+), an uncertainty of even 20-30 MeV on the threshold is comparable to the claimed binding energy. The authors should propagate the threshold uncertainties and quote the combined uncertainty on each binding energy.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Tables 1-3] The threshold column in Table 3 is labeled in MeV, while Tables 1 and 2 use GeV. Please harmonize the units.
  2. [Section 3] Several Table 1 and Table 2 rows have central masses above threshold (e.g., Sigma*_c D(3/2-), Lambda_c D*(3/2-), Lambda*_c D(3/2+)). The text does not comment on these; for a molecular interpretation these are unbound/virtual and should be explicitly recognized.
  3. [References [23,24]] The manuscript appears to condense results from Refs. [23] and [24]. Please clarify what is new in this proceedings contribution and what is carried over, and cite the earlier works where the omitted OPE details appear.
  4. [General] There are minor grammatical issues, e.g., 'Borel curves stability' in Section 3 and 'Variations of hadron mass to s0 and M_B^2' in the Fig. 1 caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the sum-rule masses are nontrivial OPE ratios compared with independent external two-hadron thresholds; weak S=0 bindings are a statistical-precision issue, not a logical reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is the QCD sum-rule mass formula, Eq. (15): M^2 is the ratio of two Borel-transformed moments of the same OPE spectral functions. This ratio is not set equal to any meson-baryon threshold. The thresholds in Tables 1-3 are external sums of known hadron masses (e.g., Lambda_c + D), and those masses do not appear on the right-hand side of Eq. (15) or in the OPE inputs. The bound-state conclusion is the comparison M_sumrule < M_threshold, which is a meaningful, externally grounded inequality. The continuum threshold s0 and Borel window M_B^2 are chosen by standard stability and pole-dominance criteria, not by fitting to the desired bound-state verdict; no equation or statement in the paper indicates that s0 was tuned to make M fall below threshold. The self-citations [23,24] refer to the group's own earlier sum-rule studies, but the present paper states the formalism, currents, parameters, and numerical tables; it does not import a unique-theorem or ansatz-as-proof through those citations. The narrow-resonance approximation in Eq. (9) is a modeling assumption and a caveat about the method's domain, but it is not a circular reduction: it does not make the predicted mass equal to an input threshold. The real weakness is that several S=0 channels (e.g., Lambda_c D 1/2-, Sigma_c D* 3/2+, Sigma*_c D 3/2+) have central masses within quoted errors of threshold, so the claimed binding is not statistically robust. That is a precision/significance concern, not a circularity defect.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper rests on the standard QCD sum rule framework plus per-channel hand choices of s0 and Borel windows. It adds no new entities beyond the predicted states themselves, and the only invented entities are the pentaquarks, which carry falsifiable mass predictions. The heaviest unstated load is the claim that the sum rule output is a pole mass in channels where the binding energy is comparable to the method's uncertainty.

free parameters (2)
  • Continuum threshold s0 per channel = e.g., 19.5-35.0 GeV^2 depending on channel (Tables 1-3)
    Chosen by hand for each current to maximize pole contribution and Borel stability; the extracted mass in Eq. (15) shifts with s0, as Fig. 1 shows, so each retained value partially shapes the quoted central mass.
  • Borel window M_B^2 = e.g., 2.83-3.43 GeV^2 for J_Lambda_cD (Table 1); ranges per channel
    Selected by the authors from OPE convergence and flatness of the mass curve; a different window yields a different central value within the quoted errors.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Quark-hadron duality and the narrow-resonance approximation for the hadronic spectral function (Eq. 9).
    The mass formula Eq. (15) extracts a single-pole mass only if the current's spectral strength is dominated by one narrow resonance; no estimate of continuum or multi-particle contamination is given in this manuscript.
  • domain assumption The interpolating currents in Eqs. (1)-(3) couple dominantly to the intended Lambda_c D / Sigma_c D / Xi_c D / Xi_cc Kbar / Omega_cc pi,rho molecular states with the stated J^P.
    The currents are built as products of baryon and meson operators, but in QCD sum rules such currents also overlap with scattering states and Fierz-rearranged compact configurations. This is the standard overlap assumption, implicit in Section 2.
  • standard math The parity projection via the (sqrt(s) rho1 +/- rho0) combinations (Eqs. 13-14) separates negative and positive parity poles.
    Taken from refs [32-35]; the decomposition is established for baryon sum rules and applied here to pentaquark currents without modification.
  • domain assumption The vacuum condensate values and quark masses from refs [36-38] (quark condensate, M_0^2 = 0.8 GeV^2, gluon condensate 0.48 GeV^4, m_s and m_c).
    These are the numerical inputs of Section 3; the quoted mass uncertainties are propagated from their uncertainties, so the results inherit this parameter set's systematics.
invented entities (1)
  • Doubly charmed pentaquark bound states (e.g., P+++_cc = ccuu dbar, P0_cc = ccdd ubar, and the Lambda_c D, Sigma_c D, Xi_cc Kbar* families) independent evidence
    purpose: Predicted hadronic states that would explain stable solutions of the QCD sum rule mass formula below two-hadron thresholds.
    Concrete masses (4.08-4.69 GeV for S=0, 4.20-4.56 GeV for S=-1) and suggested decay channels (Xi_cc pi/rho, Sigma_c D, etc.) give experiments a falsifiable handle to search for. However, no production rate or width is predicted, so a null search could not cleanly falsify the states.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Doubly charmed pentaquark states with strangeness $S=0, -1$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OEGT2RJ2

@misc{pith2026250901965,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Doubly charmed pentaquark states with strangeness $S=0, -1$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OEGT2RJ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01965}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

In this work, we have studied the mass spectra of doubly charmed pentaquark states with strangeness $S=0, -1$ by using the method of QCD sum rules. We use the parity projected sum rules to separate the contributions of negative and positive parities from the two-point correlation functions induced by the pentaquark interpolating currents. Our results predict the existence of some potential doubly charmed pentaquark bound states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01965 by Feng-Bo Duan, Qian Wang, Qi-Nan Wang, Wei Chen, Xu-Liang Chen, Zi-Yan Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Variations of hadron mass to 𝑠0 and 𝑀2 𝐵 for 𝐽 Λ𝑐𝐷 with 𝐽 𝑃 = 1 2 − . 3. Numerical results We use the following parameter values to perform numerical analyses ⟨𝑞𝑞¯ ⟩ (1GeV) = −(0.24± 0.03) 3 GeV3 , ⟨𝑞𝑔¯ 𝑠𝜎 · 𝐺𝑞⟩ (1GeV) = −𝑀2 0 ⟨𝑞𝑞¯ ⟩, 𝑀2 0 = (0.8 ± 0.2) GeV2 , ⟨𝑠𝑠¯ ⟩/⟨𝑞𝑞¯ ⟩ = 0.8 ± 0.1, ⟨𝑔 2 𝑠𝐺𝐺⟩ (1GeV) = (0.48 ± 0.14) GeV4 and 𝑚𝑠 (2 GeV) = 95+9 −3 MeV, 𝑚𝑐 (𝑚𝑐) = 1.27+0.03 −0.04 GeV, 𝑚𝑏 (𝑚𝑏) = 4.18+0.04 −0… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    LHCb collaboration, Observation of𝐽/𝜓𝑝 Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ0 𝑏→𝐽/𝜓𝐾−𝑝 Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 072001 [1507.03414]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    LHCb collaboration, Observation of a narrow pentaquark state,𝑃𝑐(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the𝑃𝑐(4450)+,Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 222001 [1904.03947]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    LHCb collaboration, Evidence for a new structure in the𝐽/𝜓𝑝 and𝐽/𝜓 ¯𝑝 systems in 𝐵0 𝑠→𝐽/𝜓𝑝 ¯𝑝 decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 062001 [2108.04720]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Bull.66(2021) 1278 [2012.10380]

    LHCb collaboration, Evidence of a𝐽/𝜓Λ structure and observation of excitedΞ− states in theΞ− 𝑏→𝐽/𝜓Λ𝐾− decay, Sci. Bull.66(2021) 1278 [2012.10380]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    LHCbcollaboration,ObservationofaJ/ 𝜓ΛResonanceConsistentwithaStrangePentaquark Candidate in B-→J/𝜓Λp¯ Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 031901 [2210.10346]. 7 Doubly charmed pentaquark states with strangeness𝑆= 0,−1 Wei Chen

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    18(2022) 751 [2109.01038]

    LHCb collaboration, Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark,Nature Phys. 18(2022) 751 [2109.01038]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    LHCb collaboration, Study of the doubly charmed tetraquark𝑇+ 𝑐𝑐,Nature Commun.13 (2022) 3351 [2109.01056]

    arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S.-L. Zhu,The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rep.639 (2016) 1

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B.-S. Zou,Hadronic molecules,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 015004 [1705.00141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Liu, H.-X

    Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S.-L. Zhu,Pentaquark and Tetraquark States, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics107 (2019) 237 [1903.11976]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C.Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas et al.,The X Y Zstates: Experimentalandtheoreticalstatusandperspectives ,PhysicsReports 873(2020)1

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Guo, X.-H

    F.-K. Guo, X.-H. Liu and S. Sakai,Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.112 (2020) 103757 [1912.07030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu and S.-L. Zhu,An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys.86(2023) 026201 [2204.02649]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Liu, Y.-W

    M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu and L.-S. Geng,Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions,Phys. Rept.1108 (2025) 1 [2404.06399]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    F. Zhu, G. Bauer and K. Yi,Experimental Road to a Charming Family of Tetraquarks ... and Beyond,Chin. Phys. Lett.41(2024) 111201 [2410.11210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    R. Chen, A. Hosaka and X. Liu,Heavy molecules and one-𝜎/𝜔-exchange model,Phys. Rev. D 96(2017) 116012 [1707.08306]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Liu, J.-J

    M.-Z. Liu, J.-J. Xie and L.-S. Geng,𝑋0(2866) as a𝐷∗ ¯𝐾∗ molecular state, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 091502 [2008.07389]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    R. Chen, N. Li, Z.-F. Sun, X. Liu and S.-L. Zhu,Doubly charmed molecular pentaquarks, Phys. Lett. B822 (2021) 136693 [2108.12730]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    K.Chen, B.WangandS.-L.Zhu, Explorationofthedoublycharmedmolecularpentaquarks , Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 116017 [2102.05868]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo and B.-S. Zou,A survey of heavy–heavy hadronic molecules, Commun. Theor. Phys.73 (2021) 125201 [2108.02673]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    $P_{cc}^N$ states in a unitarized coupled-channel approach

    C.-W. Shen, Y.-h. Lin and U.-G. Meißner,𝑃𝑁 𝑐𝑐 states in a unitarized coupled-channel approach,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 70 [2208.10865]. 8 Doubly charmed pentaquark states with strangeness𝑆= 0,−1 Wei Chen

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Hidden Charm Pentaquark $P_c(4380)$ and Doubly Charmed Baryon $\Xi_{cc}^*(4380)$ as Hadronic Molecule States

    Y. Shimizu and M. Harada,Hidden Charm Pentaquark𝑃𝑐(4380) and Doubly Charmed BaryonΞ∗ 𝑐𝑐(4380) as Hadronic Molecule States, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 094012 [1708.04743]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    Duan, Q.-N

    F.-B. Duan, Q.-N. Wang, Z.-Y. Yang, X.-L. Chen and W. Chen,Doubly charmed pentaquark states in QCD sum rules, 2401.10078

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Z.-Y. Yang, Q. Wang and W. Chen,Mass spectra of strange double charm pentaquarks with strangeness S=−1, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 056022 [2405.09067]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    X. Liu, Y. Tan, X. Chen, D. Chen, H. Huang and J. Ping,Investigation of the analog of the 𝑃𝑐 states-the doubly charmed molecular pentaquarks, 2312.04390

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    G. Yang, J. Ping and J. Segovia,Doubly Charmed Pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 074030 [2003.05253]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Guo,Prediction of exotic doubly charmed baryons within chiral effective field theory, Phys

    Z.-H. Guo,Prediction of exotic doubly charmed baryons within chiral effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 074004 [1708.04145]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Q.-S. Zhou, K. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu and S.-L. Zhu,Surveying exotic pentaquarks with the typical𝑄𝑄𝑞𝑞 ¯𝑞 configuration,Phys. Rev. C98(2018) 045204 [1801.04557]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Analysis of the doubly heavy baryon states and pentaquark states with QCD sum rules

    Z.-G. Wang,Analysis of the doubly heavy baryon states and pentaquark states with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 826 [1808.09820]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Electromagnetic properties of doubly heavy pentaquark states

    U. Özdem,Electromagnetic properties of doubly heavy pentaquark states,Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) 936 [2201.00979]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Xing and Y

    Y. Xing and Y. Niu,The study of doubly charmed pentaquark𝑐𝑐 ¯𝑞𝑞𝑞 with the SU(3) symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 978 [2106.09939]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Chung, H

    Y. Chung, H. G. Dosch, M. Kremer and D. Schall,Baryon Sum Rules and Chiral Symmetry Breaking,Nucl. Phys. B197 (1982) 55

    work page 1982

  33. [33]

    Bagan, M

    E. Bagan, M. Chabab, H. G. Dosch and S. Narison,Baryon sum rules in the heavy quark effective theory, Phys. Lett. B301 (1993) 243

    work page 1993

  34. [34]

    D. Jido, N. Kodama and M. Oka,Negative parity nucleon resonance in the QCD sum rule, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 4532 [hep-ph/9604280]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  35. [35]

    Parity projection of QCD sum rules for the nucleon

    K. Ohtani, P. Gubler and M. Oka,Parity projection of QCD sum rules for the nucleon, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 034027 [1209.1463]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  36. [36]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov,QCD and Resonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations,Nucl. Phys. B147 (1979) 385

    work page 1979

  37. [37]

    L. J. Reinders, H. Rubinstein and S. Yazaki,Hadron Properties from QCD Sum Rules, Phys. Rept. 127(1985) 1

    work page 1985

  38. [38]

    Particle Data Groupcollaboration, Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 030001. 9

    work page 2024

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.