Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

This review argues that recent semiclassical gravity results point to a final singularity at black hole evaporation, and therefore no information loss.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A short survey of semiclassical gravity advances, with emphasis on the author's own results on the initial value problem and a conjecture that black hole information loss is avoided.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A competent, self-referential survey whose black-hole no-loss conclusion is a conjecture dressed as a takeaway; useful as an entry point, not as a resolution. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2509.02051 v1 pith:MTMLDN5D submitted 2025-09-02 gr-qc hep-th

Recent developments in semiclassical gravity

Benito A. Ju\'arez-Aubry This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords semiclassical gravityblack hole evaporationinformation lossquantum strong cosmic censorshipCauchy horizon instabilityHadamard statesinitial value problemstress-energy tensor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This short review maps recent progress in semiclassical gravity, the regime in which quantum fields back-react on a classical curved spacetime through the expectation value of their stress-energy tensor. It reports concrete advances in two technical directions: existence and uniqueness results for symmetry-reduced and cosmological solutions, and a conjectural initial value formulation that reduces the fourth-order system to second order for physically regular states. Its boldest claim is about black holes: under a quantum version of strong cosmic censorship, the Cauchy horizon at the evaporation endpoint is generically unstable, so spacetime ends in a singularity and there is no post-evaporation region in which information could be lost. If correct, the note gives a coherent reference map of the field and turns the information-loss puzzle into a conjecture that can be attacked directly.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, semiclassical gravity is no longer only a framework: recent work has produced concrete structural results. These include existence and uniqueness for solutions with symmetries and in FLRW cosmology, a conjectural initial value formulation in which physical solutions depend smoothly on ℏ and the problem reduces to second order, and a proposal for Hadamard initial data through an infinite tower of constraints. The sharpest claim concerns black holes: assuming the quantum strong cosmic censorship conjectures—that a Hadamard state generically cannot be extended across a Cauchy horizon and that such horizons are generically unstable under semiclassical back-reaction—the

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the semiclassical Einstein–Klein–Gordon system: Einstein's equations sourced by the renormalised expectation value of the stress-energy tensor of a free Klein-Gordon field, with the two-point function subject to the Hadamard condition. For the information-loss argument, the load-bearing mechanism is the author's quantum strong cosmic censorship conjecture: generically, a Hadamard state on a domain of dependence cannot be extended across a Cauchy horizon, so semiclassical back-reaction makes the horizon singular. The review uses this to close the post-evaporation region in the evaporation diagram.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that quantum effects generically make the boundary of predictability—the Cauchy horizon—singular, so the evaporation endpoint must be a final singularity rather than a doorway to another region.

What would settle it

A concrete calculation of the renormalised stress-energy tensor along the Cauchy horizon of a fully dynamical evaporating black hole spacetime (not the stationary Reissner–Nordström–de Sitter case) that remains bounded and admits a Hadamard extension would falsify the generic instability claim. So would an explicit solution of the semiclassical Einstein–Klein–Gordon system describing evaporation with a globally hyperbolic post-evaporation region.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the quantum strong cosmic censorship conjectures hold, black hole evaporation ends in a final singularity rather than a post-evaporation region, so no information is lost.
  • The initial value problem for semiclassical gravity may reduce to second order for physical solutions with smooth ℏ-dependence, with the infinite tower of initial-data constraints giving a practical route to adiabatic initial states.
  • Existence and uniqueness results for FLRW and other symmetric spacetimes mean the semiclassical Einstein–Klein–Gordon system is now soluble in broad classes, not just in maximally symmetric cases.
  • Generalizations of the singularity theorem and black hole area theorem to semiclassical gravity indicate that classical spacetime-theoretic results have semiclassical analogues.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the censorship conjecture is right, information-theoretic attempts to recover what fell in must focus on correlations in the outgoing Hawking radiation before the endpoint, not on anything emerging after it; tests of unitary recovery should therefore look for late-time purification signals in the radiation itself.
  • The conjecture suggests a concrete research programme: compute renormalised stress-energy tensors on the Cauchy horizon of fully dynamical, non-symmetric evaporating black holes. Stationary Reissner–Nordström–de Sitter examples already show divergence; generic dynamical examples would be the real test.
  • The author's smooth-in-ℏ conjecture, if transferred from the initial value problem to the evaporation endpoint, implies the final singularity arises smoothly in ℏ and would require genuine quantum gravity to resolve—connecting the censorship result to quantum-gravity phenomenology.
  • A possible extension of the review's comparison is to check whether stochastic or post-quantum frameworks preserve or break the censorship picture; since those frameworks alter the state dynamics, they could either reinforce or circumvent the generic instability.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This short review of semiclassical gravity (SG) surveys recent developments in three areas: symmetry-reduced solutions and special Hadamard states, the initial value problem, and black hole evaporation. After presenting the semiclassical Einstein–Klein–Gordon system (Eq. (1)), the author discusses four structural complications (higher-order nature, non-locality, renormalization, and Hadamard initial data), reviews recent existence/uniqueness and stability results, and briefly describes frameworks beyond SG. The central non-review claim is in Section 4: assuming the author's quantum strong cosmic censorship (QSCC) conjectures, SG predicts a final singularity after black hole evaporation, so there is no post-evaporation region and hence 'no loss of information'.

Significance. If taken as a survey, the note is a useful, compact reference map: it collects rigorous results on cosmological and symmetric solutions, highlights the initial-value problem, and correctly labels conjectures as conjectures. The strongest advertised contribution is the claim that information loss is not expected in SG. However, this claim rests on an unproven conjecture and on an inference from the existence of a final singularity to information preservation, which is not established in the note. The survey's value is largely independent of that claim, and the information-loss section needs substantial revision before the abstract's promise is justified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, items 1 and 2] The step from QSCC to 'no loss of information' is a logical gap. The two conjectures concern the generic impossibility of extending Hadamard states across Cauchy horizons and the generic instability of Cauchy horizons under semiclassical back-reaction. They say nothing about unitarity of the evaporation process or about whether the final state preserves the information encoded in the initial state. In standard QFT, information loss is defined by non-unitarity between past and future asymptotic regions; removing future infinity via a final singularity makes the question ill-posed, not resolved. The text itself concedes that 'one expects that quantum gravity should cure this pathology,' which underscores that SG alone does not answer the information puzzle. To support the conclusion, the author would need an explicit argument that a final singularity prevents information loss in a way cons
  2. [Abstract and Section 4] The conditional status of the no-information-loss conclusion is not carried into the abstract. Section 4 correctly says 'If these conjectures hold, SG actually predicts a final singularity' and explicitly labels QSCC as conjectures from the author's own ref. [42]. Yet the abstract states as a development 'why information loss is not expected.' This overstates what the manuscript establishes. The conclusion should be presented as conditional on a conjectural scenario, not as a result of recent semiclassical gravity research.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 1, point (III)] In the definition of : Φ² :, the notation '1 1' appears where the identity operator is meant; this is likely a typesetting artifact and should be cleaned up.
  2. [Section 2] The abbreviation 'FLR W' appears with inconsistent spacing; it should be 'FLRW' throughout.
  3. [General] The survey is substantially organized around the author's own research program (e.g., refs. [5,7,12,13,15,17,25,34,42,47]). This is not inherently a flaw, but a sentence in the introduction stating the author's perspective and the selection criteria for cited work would improve transparency.
  4. [Section 4] The phrase 'hence no loss of information' appears twice in abbreviated form (abstract and main text). Even if the argument were fleshed out, the wording should be more precise, e.g., 'no post-evaporation region in which information could be lost' rather than a categorical resolution.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Sec. 4's no-information-loss conclusion is a load-bearing self-citation to the author's own unproved QSCC conjecture.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract; Section 4, 'The black hole information loss puzzle' (second paragraph)]
    "If these conjectures hold, SG actually predicts a final singularity, which emanates from the evaporation endpoint, where spacetime terminates. However, one expects that quantum gravity should cure this pathology. In this strong-cosmic-censored picture, there is no post-evaporation region, hence no loss of information. See again [42], especially Sec. 3 and 4, for details."

    The abstract advertises 'black hole evaporation and why information loss is not expected' as one of the advances. In Sec. 4 that conclusion is not derived; it is imported from the author's own prior paper [42]. The quoted passage makes the dependency explicit: the no-information-loss claim follows only if the QSCC conjectures from [42] hold. Those conjectures are not proved in [42] (the note itself labels them 'conjectures'), and the note gives no independent argument that 'no post-evaporation region' is equivalent to 'no loss of information' in the QFT sense of unitarity. Hence the central novelty of the note reduces to a self-citation of an unproven framework; external refs [43,44] support Cauchy-horizon instability but not the information-preservation conclusion.

full rationale

Most of this note is an ordinary literature survey: the summaries of the initial value problem, symmetry-reduced solutions, characteristic data, and stochastic frameworks cite published or arXiv work, including independent theorems (e.g., Fewster–Kontou, Meda–Pinamonti), and those parts are not circular. The only load-bearing self-citation is Section 4's information-loss discussion. The note is transparent that QSCC is conjectural ('If these conjectures hold…') and even concedes 'one expects that quantum gravity should cure this pathology,' so this is not a fully closed derivation. But because the abstract presents 'why information loss is not expected' as a development, and the only support for that specific claim is the author's own unproved conjecture from [42], the central claim is partially circular. I therefore flag one self-citation-load-bearing step. The score is 6 rather than higher because the paper is explicit about the conditional status and the Cauchy-horizon instability premise has independent support from [43,44].

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters, new entities, or novel fitting. Its claims rest instead on domain assumptions of algebraic QFT and on the author's own conjecture for the information-loss conclusion.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The semiclassical Einstein-Klein-Gordon system (Eq. 1) captures the essential physics of the semiclassical regime of quantum gravity.
    Adopted throughout the review as the central framework; not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Hadamard states are the appropriate class of states for which the renormalized stress-energy tensor is finite.
    Invoked in Section 1 as a sufficient condition; standard in AQFT but a substantive assumption.
  • standard math Existence of distinguished Green operators and the Hadamard parametrix in globally hyperbolic spacetimes.
    Used in Section 1 to write Eq. (2) and the parametrix Eq. (3).
  • ad hoc to paper Quantum strong cosmic censorship (Section 4, points 1 and 2) is true, or at least plausible enough to warrant the conclusion that information loss is not expected.
    The no-information-loss conclusion is explicitly conditional on this unproved conjecture from the author's own previous work [42].

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Recent developments in semiclassical gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MTMLDN5D

@misc{pith2026250902051,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Recent developments in semiclassical gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MTMLDN5D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02051}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Semiclassical gravity (SG) aims to describe the semiclassical regime of quantum gravity. In SG quantum fields curve classical spacetime in an effective way through the expectation value of their stress-energy tensor, while propagating in the spacetime they curve. I discuss some advances in SG in three directions: (i) in understanding structural properties or special solutions of SG in spacetimes with isometries or special Hadamard states (ii) in understanding the initial value formulation and (iii) in black hole evaporation and why information loss is not expected. Semiclassical frameworks beyond SG are briefly surveyed. The hope is that this short note will provide a good set of references and indicate interesting open problems and directions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Revisiting semiclassical scalar QED in 1+1 dimensions

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Backreaction in semiclassical scalar QED in 1+1D avoids instabilities and produces over-screening at high external charges.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Radiative effects in semiclassical theory

    M. D. Crisp and E. T. Jaynes, “Radiative effects in semiclassical theory” Phys. Rev. 179 (1969), 1253-1261 [erratum: Phys. Rev. 185 (1969), 2046] doi:10.1103/PhysRev.179.1253

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.179.1253 1969

  2. [2]

    Algebraic Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetimes

    C. J. Fewster and R. Verch, “Algebraic Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetimes”, Advances in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory, edited by R. Brunetti et al (Springer, 2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Theorems on the Uniqueness and Thermal Properties of Stationary, Nonsingular, Quasifree States on Space-Times with a Bifurcate Killing Horizon

    B. S. Kay and R. M. Wald, “Theorems on the Uniqueness and Thermal Properties of Stationary, Nonsingular, Quasifree States on Space-Times with a Bifurcate Killing Horizon”, Phys. Rept. 207 (1991), 49-136 doi:10.1016/0370-1573(91)90015-E

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(91)90015-e 1991

  4. [4]

    Micro-local approach to the Hadamard condition in quantum field theory on curved space-time

    M. J. Radzikowski, “Micro-local approach to the Hadamard condition in quantum field theory on curved space-time”, Commun. Math. Phys. 179 (1996), 529-553 doi:10.1007/BF02100096

    doi:10.1007/bf02100096 1996

  5. [5]

    On the initial value problem for semiclassical gravity without and with quantum state collapses

    B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry, B. S. Kay, T. Miramontes and D. Sudarsky, “On the initial value prob- lem for semiclassical gravity without and with quantum state collapses”, JCAP 01 (2023), 040 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/01/040 [arXiv:2205.11671 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Algebras of local observables on a manifold

    J. Dimock, “Algebras of local observables on a manifold”, Commun. Math. Phys. 77 (1980) no.3, 219-228 doi:10.1007/BF01269921

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01269921 1980

  7. [7]

    Semiclassical theories as initial value problems

    B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry, T. Miramontes and D. Sudarsky, “Semiclassical theories as initial value prob- lems”, J. Math. Phys. 61 (2020) no.3, 032301 doi:10.1063/1.5122782 [arXiv:1907.09960 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Gravitational radiation by quantum systems

    L. H. Ford, “Gravitational radiation by quantum systems”, Annals Phys. 144 (1982), 238 doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90115-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90115-4 1982

  9. [9]

    Semiclassical gravity theory and quantum fluctuations

    C. I. Kuo and L. H. Ford, “Semiclassical gravity theory and quantum fluctuations”, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993), 4510-4519 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.4510 [arXiv:gr-qc/9304008 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  10. [10]

    Stress Tensor Fluctuations and Passive Quantum Gravity

    L. H. Ford and C. H. Wu, “Stress tensor fluctuations and passive quantum gravity”, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 42 (2003), 15-26 doi:10.1023/A:1023322904365 [arXiv:gr-qc/0102063 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    Semiclassical gravity beyond coherent states

    S. Ahmed, C. Lima and E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, “Semiclassical gravity beyond coherent states”, JHEP 01 (2024), 001 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)001 [arXiv:2310.16289 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Semi-classical gravity in de Sitter spacetime and the cosmological constant

    B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry, “Semi-classical gravity in de Sitter spacetime and the cosmological constant”, Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019), 134912 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134912 [arXiv:1903.03924 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Renormalisation in maximally symmetric spaces and semiclassical gravity in Anti-de Sitter spacetime

    B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry and M. C. Mamani-Leqque, “Renormalisation in maximally symmetric spaces and semiclassical gravity in Anti-de Sitter spacetime”, Class. Quant. Grav. 42 (2025) no.8, 085009 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adc535 [arXiv:2411.06834 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Cosmological de Sitter Solutions of the Semiclassical Einstein Equation

    H. Gottschalk, N. R. Rothe and D. Siemssen, “Cosmological de Sitter Solutions of the Semiclassi- cal Einstein Equation”, Annales Henri Poincar´ e24 (2023) no.9, 2949-3029 doi:10.1007/s00023-023- 01315-z [arXiv:2206.07774 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Semiclassical gravity in static spacetimes as a constrained initial value problem

    B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry, “Semiclassical Gravity in Static Spacetimes as a Constrained Initial Value Problem”, Annales Henri Poincar´ e 23 (2022) no.4, 1451-1487 doi:10.1007/s00023-021-01133-1 [arXiv:2011.05947 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Static Symmetric Solutions of the Semi-Classical Einstein–Klein–Gordon System

    K. Sanders, “Static Symmetric Solutions of the Semi-Classical Einstein–Klein–Gordon System”, Annales Henri Poincar´ e23 (2022) no.4, 1321-1358 doi:10.1007/s00023-021-01115-3 [arXiv:2007.14311 [math-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Semiclassical gravity with a conformally covariant field in globally hyperbolic spacetimes

    B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry and S. K. Modak, “Semiclassical gravity with a conformally covariant field in globally hyperbolic spacetimes”, J. Math. Phys. 63 (2022) no.9, 092303 doi:10.1063/5.0099345 [arXiv:2110.01719 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Stable cosmological models driven by a free quantum scalar field

    C. Dappiaggi, K. Fredenhagen and N. Pinamonti, “Stable cosmological models driven by a free quan- tum scalar field”, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008), 104015 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.104015 [arXiv:0801.2850 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  19. [19]

    Dynamical Backreaction in Robertson-Walker Spacetime

    B. Eltzner and H. Gottschalk, “Dynamical Backreaction in Robertson-Walker Spacetime”, Rev. Math. Phys. 23 (2011), 531-551 doi:10.1142/S0129055X11004357 [arXiv:1003.3630 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    The Cosmological Semiclassical Einstein Equation as an Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical System

    H. Gottschalk and D. Siemssen, “The Cosmological Semiclassical Einstein Equation as an Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical System”, Annales Henri Poincar´ e 22 (2021) no.12, 3915-3964 doi:10.1007/s00023-021-01060-1 [arXiv:1809.03812 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Special cosmological models derived from the semiclassical Einstein equation on flat FLRW space-times

    H. Gottschalk, N. R. Rothe and D. Siemssen, “Special cosmological models derived from the semi- classical Einstein equation on flat FLR W space-times”, Class. Quant. Grav.39 (2022) no.12, 125004 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac6e22 [arXiv:2112.15050 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions of the Semiclassical Einstein Equation in Cosmological Models

    P. Meda, N. Pinamonti and D. Siemssen, “Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions of the Semiclassical Einstein Equation in Cosmological Models”, Annales Henri Poincar´ e 22 (2021) no.12, 3965-4015 doi:10.1007/s00023-021-01067-8 [arXiv:2007.14665 [math-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    On the initial conditions and solutions of the semiclassical Einstein equations in a cosmological scenario

    N. Pinamonti, “On the initial conditions and solutions of the semiclassical Einstein equations in a cosmological scenario”, Commun. Math. Phys. 305 (2011), 563-604 doi:10.1007/s00220-011-1268-z [arXiv:1001.0864 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    Global Existence of Solutions of the Semiclassical Einstein Equation for Cosmological Spacetimes

    N. Pinamonti and D. Siemssen, “Global Existence of Solutions of the Semiclassical Einstein Equation for Cosmological Spacetimes”, Commun. Math. Phys. 334 (2015) no.1, 171-191 doi:10.1007/s00220- 014-2099-5 [arXiv:1309.6303 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    A new class of semiclassical gravity solutions, gravitational quantum stealths and regular Cauchy horizons,

    B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry, “A new class of semiclassical gravity solutions, gravitational quantum stealths and regular Cauchy horizons,” [arXiv:2412.08402 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Quantum-corrected anti–de Sitter spacetime

    J. C. Thompson and E. Winstanley, “Quantum-corrected anti–de Sitter spacetime”, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) no.12, 125003 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.125003

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.125003 2024

  27. [27]

    Quantum Backreaction on Three-Dimensional Black Holes and Naked Singularities

    M. Casals, A. Fabbri, C. Mart ´ ınez and J. Zanelli, “Quantum Backreaction on Three- Dimensional Black Holes and Naked Singularities”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) no.13, 131102 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.131102 [arXiv:1608.05366 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Evaporation of four-dimensional dynamical black holes sourced by the quantum trace anomaly

    P. Meda, N. Pinamonti, S. Roncallo and N. Zangh ` ı, “Evaporation of four-dimensional dynamical black holes sourced by the quantum trace anomaly”, Class. Quant. Grav.38 (2021) no.19, 195022 [er- ratum: Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) no.5, 059501] doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac1fd2 [arXiv:2103.02057 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    The backreaction problem for black holes in semiclassical gravity

    A. del Rio, “The backreaction problem for black holes in semiclassical gravity”, Gen. Rel. Grav. 57 (2025) no.2, 30 doi:10.1007/s10714-025-03352-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-025-03352-x 2025

  30. [30]

    A semiclassical singularity theorem

    C. J. Fewster and E. A. Kontou, “A semiclassical singularity theorem”, Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) no.7, 075028 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac566b [arXiv:2108.12668 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    A generalization of the Hawking black hole area theorem

    E. A. Kontou and V. Sacchi, “A generalization of the Hawking black hole area theorem”, Gen. Rel. Grav. 56 (2024) no.5, 62 doi:10.1007/s10714-024-03245-5 [arXiv:2303.06788 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Einstein equation with quantum corrections reduced to second order

    L. Parker and J. Z. Simon, “Einstein equation with quantum corrections reduced to second order”, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993), 1339-1355 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1339 [arXiv:gr-qc/9211002 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  33. [33]

    Does back reaction enforce the averaged null energy condition in semiclassical gravity?

    E. E. Flanagan and R. M. Wald, “Does back reaction enforce the averaged null energy condition in semiclassical gravity?”, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996), 6233-6283 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.6233 [arXiv:gr- qc/9602052 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 1996

  34. [34]

    The Hadamard condition on a Cauchy surface and the renormalized stress-energy tensor

    B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry, B. S. Kay, T. Miramontes and D. Sudarsky, “The Hadamard condition on a Cauchy surface and the renormalized stress-energy tensor”, JCAP 10 (2024), 002 doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2024/10/002 [arXiv:2406.01498 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Hadamard states on spherically symmetric characteristic surfaces, the semi-classical Einstein equations and the Hawking effect

    D. W. Janssen and R. Verch, “Hadamard states on spherically symmetric characteristic surfaces, the semi-classical Einstein equations and the Hawking effect”, Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023) no.4, 045002 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acb039 [arXiv:2209.00577 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Classical and Quantum Scattering Theory for Linear Scalar Fields on the Schwarzschild Metric I

    J. Dimock and B. S. Kay, “Classical and Quantum Scattering Theory for Linear Scalar Fields on the Schwarzschild Metric I”, Annals Phys. 175 (1987), 366 doi:10.1016/0003-4916(87)90214-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(87)90214-4 1987

  37. [37]

    Dappiaggi, V

    C. Dappiaggi, V. Moretti and N. Pinamonti, Hadamard States from Light-like Hypersurfaces (Springer, 2017) [arXiv:1706.09666 [math-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Construction of Hadamard states by characteristic Cauchy problem

    C. G´ erard and M. Wrochna, “Construction of Hadamard states by characteristic Cauchy problem”, Anal. Part. Diff. Eq. 9 (2016) no.1, 111-149 doi:10.2140/apde.2016.9.111 [arXiv:1409.6691 [math- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Linear stability of semiclassical theories of gravity

    P. Meda and N. Pinamonti, “Linear Stability of Semiclassical Theories of Gravity”, Annales Henri Poincare 24 (2023) no.4, 1211-1243 doi:10.1007/s00023-022-01246-1 [arXiv:2201.10288 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    The Cauchy Problem for Symmetric Hyperbolic Systems with Nonlocal Potentials

    F. Finster, S. Murro and G. Schmid, “The Cauchy Problem for Symmetric Hyperbolic Systems with Nonlocal Potentials”, [arXiv:2507.05004 [math.AP]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes”, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975), 199-220 [erratum: Commun. Math. Phys. 46 (1976), 206] doi:10.1007/BF02345020

    doi:10.1007/bf02345020 1975

  42. [42]

    Quantum strong cosmic censorship and black hole evaporation

    B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry, “Quantum strong cosmic censorship and black hole evaporation”, Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024) no.19, 195027 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad756c [arXiv:2305.01617 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Quantum instability of the Cauchy horizon in Reiss- ner–Nordstr¨ om–de Sitter spacetime

    S. Hollands, R. M. Wald and J. Zahn, “Quantum instability of the Cauchy horizon in Reiss- ner–Nordstr¨ om–de Sitter spacetime”, Class. Quant. Grav.37 (2020) no.11, 115009 doi:10.1088/1361- 6382/ab8052 [arXiv:1912.06047 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Quantum stress tensor at the Cauchy horizon of the Reissner–Nordstr¨ om–de Sitter spacetime,

    S. Hollands, C. Klein and J. Zahn, “Quantum stress tensor at the Cauchy horizon of the Reissner–Nordstr¨ om–de Sitter spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) no.8, 085004 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.085004 [arXiv:2006.10991 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Stochastic gravity: A Primer with applications

    B. L. Hu and E. Verdaguer, “Stochastic gravity: A Primer with applications”, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003), R1-R42 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/6/201 [arXiv:gr-qc/0211090 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  46. [46]

    A Postquantum Theory of Classical Gravity?

    J. Oppenheim, “A Postquantum Theory of Classical Gravity?”, Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023) no.4, 041040 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041040 [arXiv:1811.03116 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Generally covariant dynamical reduction models and the Hadamard condition

    B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry, B. S. Kay and D. Sudarsky, “Generally covariant dynamical re- duction models and the Hadamard condition”, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.2, 025010 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.025010 [arXiv:1708.09371 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    What happens once an accelerating observer has detected a Rindler particle?

    A. Garcia-Chung, B. A. Ju´ arez-Aubry and D. Sudarsky, “What happens once an acceler- ating observer has detected a Rindler particle?”, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) no.2, 025002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.025002 [arXiv:2105.01831 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Three little paradoxes: making sense of semiclassical gravity

    A. Großardt, “Three little paradoxes: Making sense of semiclassical gravity”, A VS Quantum Sci. 4 (2022) no.1, 010502 doi:10.1116/5.0073509 [arXiv:2201.10452 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Fully Self-Consistent Semiclassical Gravity

    R. Muci˜ no, E. Okon, D. Sudarsky and M. Wiedemann, “Fully Self-Consistent Semiclassical Gravity”, [arXiv:2506.17149 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Towards a consistent Semiclassical Theory of Gravity

    F. Pipa, “Towards a consistent Semiclassical Theory of Gravity”, [arXiv:2507.05237 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.