Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

Emergent odd viscoelasticity in chiral soft glassy materials

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts that chiral glassy materials with slowly rotating inclusions show an odd viscosity that grows as the rotation frequency decreases, with a resonant odd viscoelastic response at twice that frequency.

desk verdict Clean chiral-SGR model with a neat shifted-spectrum identity for odd viscoelasticity, but the headline scalings and the 2Ω resonance rest on the standard exponential prior in SGR—a model dependence the abstract doesn't own. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04693 v1 pith:3PHHOLLJ submitted 2025-09-04 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

Debarghya Banerjee , Peter Sollich This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords chiralactivematteroddviscosityviscoelasticitysoftglassyrheologySGRmodelrotorsoscillatorysheardynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that disordered chiral active matter—modeled as actively rotating inclusions embedded in a soft glassy matrix—should display an odd viscoelastic response that combines the slow, power-law relaxation of glasses with a new resonant coupling to rotation. In steady shear the model predicts an odd viscosity that grows as the active rotation frequency Omega decreases, scaling as Omega^(X-2) near the glass transition; in oscillatory shear it predicts an odd viscoelastic spectrum with a resonance at driving frequency 2Omega and a high-frequency power law. The central object is the identity eta*_odd = (i/2)[eta*_0(omega+2Omega) - eta*_0(omega-2Omega)], which expresses the odd response entirely in terms of the passive glass spectrum shifted by twice the rotation frequency. If correct, this gives a concrete rheological signature of chiral activity in amorphous materials and connects the fields of odd viscosity and glassy rheology.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the chiral SGR model, a mean-field soft-glassy-rheology description in which each mesoscopic element contains an actively rotating inclusion coupled to a glassy matrix. A pre-averaging closure, exact to linear order in strain, reduces the master equation to two coupled Maxwell-like stress equations, with the inclusion equation carrying the active-rotation term -Omega(epsilon_ik sigma_kj + epsilon_jk sigma_ik). Solving these equations and integrating over the exponential yield-energy distribution yields the finite-difference identity eta*_odd = (i/2)[eta*_0(omega+2Omega) - eta*_0(omega-2Omega)], which is the single formula that generates all the scaling results,

What would settle it

Measure the steady-shear odd viscosity of a dense suspension of active rotors in a colloidal glass while varying the rotation frequency Omega; if the odd viscosity decreases with decreasing Omega, or if oscillatory shear shows no peak when the driving frequency equals 2Omega, the predicted growth and resonance are falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper introduces a chiral version of the soft glassy rheology (SGR) model—an ensemble of mesoscopic elements, each an actively rotating inclusion in a glassy matrix—and shows that in linear response the inclusion stress acquires an odd component. For steady shear the odd viscosity scales as Omega^(X-2), so it grows as the active rotation frequency Omega decreases, the opposite of what a naive fast-rotation picture would suggest. In oscillatory shear, the odd viscoelastic spectrum is exactly a finite difference of the passive glassy spectrum at frequencies shifted by ±2Omega; this produces a resonance at omega=2Omega and a high-frequency power law Omega omega^(X-3). Away from zero frequen

Load-bearing premise

The predictions assume that the glassy matrix has an exponential distribution of yield energies, making the passive viscosity diverge at low frequency; if the matrix is not close enough to a glass transition, the odd viscosity would not grow as rotation slows and the resonance would disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Steady shear of a chiral glass should show an odd viscosity that increases as the inclusions rotate more slowly, scaling as Omega^(X-2) near the glass transition.
  • Oscillatory shear should show a resonance-like peak in the odd response when the driving frequency is twice the rotation frequency, reflecting reinforcement of extension and compression by the rotation.
  • Away from the resonance, the odd response contains both viscous and elastic parts, meaning the same material can show odd viscosity and odd elasticity simultaneously.
  • Active rotation cuts off the slow relaxation modes that dominate the passive glass, reducing the shear viscosity while generating an odd viscosity.
  • The finite-difference identity means the chiral response can be predicted directly from the passive glass spectrum, so odd viscoelasticity is inherited from ordinary glassy rheology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The identity suggests a rheological probe: locating the 2Omega peak in an oscillatory-shear measurement could directly read off the active rotation frequency of inclusions.
  • The exponential yield-energy distribution is the input that produces the divergent low-frequency spectrum; alternative distributions or states below the glass transition would weaken or remove the predicted growth of odd viscosity, a checkable prediction for particle simulations of dense spinners.
  • Because the linear theory predicts large stresses near resonance, nonlinear effects such as enhanced yielding or shear-thickening should be most pronounced there, a testable extension to large-amplitude oscillatory shear.
  • The relaxation-time-cutoff mechanism is generic, so analogous odd viscoelastic signatures may appear in any glassy matrix containing active rotors, including biological tissues and emulsions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a chiral soft glassy rheology (SGR) model in which mesoscopic elements consist of an actively rotating inclusion embedded in a glassy matrix. The model combines the original SGR yielding dynamics with an active rotation frequency Ω. Using a pre-averaging approximation that is exact to linear order in strains, the authors derive closed stress-evolution equations and obtain the linear response to steady and oscillatory shear. The central formal results are Eqs. (12)–(13), which express the shear and odd viscoelastic spectra as combinations of the passive SGR spectrum η0*(ω) shifted by ±2Ω. The paper predicts that in steady shear the odd viscosity scales as Ω^{X−2} for 1<X<2, so it grows as Ω decreases, and that in oscillatory shear there is a resonance-like feature at ω=2Ω together with glassy power-law tails η*_odd(ω)∼Ωω^{X−3}.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes a new class of odd viscoelastic response in disordered chiral active matter, with explicit, falsifiable scaling predictions. The derivation in the supplementary material is careful and transparent: the pre-averaging closure is justified to linear order, the noise-free algebra is presented in detail, and there are no fitted parameters—the predictions follow from the model plus the independently established passive SGR spectrum. The paper also gives a clear physical interpretation of the 2Ω resonance in terms of reinforcement of extension/compression over half a rotation period. The main limitation is that the headline predictions are conditional on the exponential yield-energy prior that produces the divergent zero-frequency passive SGR viscosity; the manuscript does not establish that this prior is the correct microscopic description for rotating-inclusion systems. With appropriate qualification of that scope, and with corrections to a small number of internal inconsistencies, the work would be a useful contribution to the odd-viscoelasticity literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text Eqs. (7)–(8) vs. SM §III] The printed source terms in Eqs. (7)–(8) contain an extra factor of 2: they read 2k1G v_ij and 2k2G v_ij. The SM derivation, Eqs. (36)–(37), gives k1G v_ij and k2G v_ij, and the steady-state solution Eq. (9) in the main text is consistent with the SM form, not with the printed factor 2. The factor is also absent from Eq. (10). Please correct the source terms. The final spectra (12)–(13) are derived from the SM equations, so this is not load-bearing for the scaling claims, but as printed it is a formal inconsistency in the central constitutive equations.
  2. [SM §IV, Eqs. (57)–(58); main text 'Steady shear flow'] The prediction η_odd(0)∼Ω^{X−2} and the 2Ω-resonance both rely on η0*(ω)∼(iω)^{X−2}, which follows only from the exponential prior ρ(E)=e^{−E} with 1<X<2. For a generic prior with finite mean relaxation time, η0*(0) is finite, and Eq. (13) gives η_odd(0) ∼ 2Ω⟨τ²⟩, i.e. the odd viscosity vanishes as Ω→0 rather than growing. The paper does not provide a microscopic argument that rotating-inclusion microstructures map to the exponential prior; it inherits this prior from passive SGR. This is a load-bearing assumption behind the headline scaling. Please either justify the exponential prior for the systems described, explicitly frame the result as a property of the exponential-prior class, or test sensitivity by computing η_odd for a representative alternative prior with finite mean relaxation time.
  3. [SM §IV, final paragraph; Abstract and Conclusions] The SM states that 'linear theory should not be trusted to capture the resonance effects quantitatively' because the divergence at ω=2Ω is inherited from the divergent η0(0). This caveat appears only in the supplement, while the abstract and conclusions present the 2Ω resonance as a headline result. Given that the divergence is a linear-theory artifact that nonlinear effects may regularize, the main text must carry the same caveat, and the resonance should be described as a linear-response divergence requiring nonlinear treatment, not as a quantitatively established peak.
minor comments (3)
  1. [After Eq. (8)] The sentence 'with the last term in Eq. (8) accounting for the effect of the active rotation of the inclusion' should refer to Eq. (7), since the active-rotation term appears in the inclusion stress equation, not in the matrix equation.
  2. [Main text Eq. (9) vs. SM Eq. (45)] The signs of the off-diagonal entries in the steady-state inclusion stress matrix differ between Eq. (9) and SM Eq. (45) (e.g. the 2Ωτ entries and the third-row entries). Please check the sign convention and make the two presentations consistent.
  3. [Abstract and main text, 'grows as Ω decreases'] The statement that odd viscosity grows as Ω decreases would benefit from an immediate qualifier that this is a result for the linear response in the exponential-prior regime 1<X<2, and that the limits Ω→0 and ω→0 do not commute; this is closely related to major comment 2 and would prevent casual misreading.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the chiral SGR derivation is a direct model calculation, and the passive SGR spectrum is a transparent, independently established input rather than a fitted or repackaged prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central formulas, Eqs. (12)-(13), are exact linear-response identities of the chiral SGR model: the odd viscosity is defined as the antisymmetric component of the complex viscosity tensor, and the E-integration over the stated exponential prior gives the finite difference of the passive SGR spectrum. No parameter is fitted to the quantities being predicted, and no fitted constant is renamed as a prediction. The low-frequency scaling and the resonance at ω=2Ω are conditional on the known passive SGR result η0*(ω)~(iω)^{X-2}, which the paper explicitly takes from prior SGR work (Refs. [51-53]) and whose underlying assumption ρ(E)=e^{-E} is stated in SM Section IV. This cited spectrum is parameter-free, emerges from stated model assumptions, and does not itself contain the odd/chiral response; it therefore counts as independent support rather than circular self-citation. The authors even caution in SM Section IV that the resonance should not be trusted quantitatively within linear theory, showing that they are not presenting a model-internal artifact as a validated prediction. Self-citations are present but transparent and load-bearing only in the benign sense of using an established prior model as an input. Overall, the derivation is self-contained as a model calculation and no step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model does not introduce new particles or forces; it extends SGR with an active rotation parameter. The parameters k1, k2, k3, tau0, X, and Omega are model inputs, not fitted to data. The key assumptions are the SGR exponential density of states and the pre-averaging closure.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Yield rates follow the activated form Gamma0 exp(-(E - E_elastic)/X), as in SGR.
    Adopted from the standard SGR model; enters the master equation (3).
  • domain assumption The prior yield energy distribution is exponential, rho(E) = e^(-E), with effective temperature X in the range 1 < X < 2.
    Used in SM Section IV to obtain eta*_0(omega) ~ (iomega)^(X-2) and hence the scaling predictions.
  • domain assumption Pre-averaging approximation replaces the strains in the yield rate by their averages; exact to linear order in strains.
    Needed to close the stress equations; justified in the paper as exact to linear order.
  • domain assumption Residual deformations after a yield event are drawn from isotropic, volume-preserving distributions with vanishing mean strain.
    Ensures the post-yield average strain vanishes; stated in the main text and used in the SM.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergent odd viscoelasticity in chiral soft glassy materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3PHHOLLJ

@misc{pith2026250904693,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergent odd viscoelasticity in chiral soft glassy materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3PHHOLLJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04693}
}
read the original abstract

Rheological properties of chiral active materials have been an important area of research in the recent past, in particular regarding odd terms in their mechanical response. While much progress has been made in the study of odd viscous fluids and odd elastic solids, there is still a lack of understanding of odd viscoelastic responses. We introduce a chiral soft glassy rheology model to understand the emergence and nature of such odd viscoelastic responses in a class of amorphous solids. We use this model, which effectively considers an ensemble of actively rotating inclusions in a glassy matrix, to study the linear stress response to steady and oscillatory shear flows. For steady shear we find an odd viscosity that, non-trivially, grows as the active rotation frequency {\Omega} decreases. In oscillatory shear we find an odd viscoelastic spectrum with a non-trivial dependence on the driving frequency {\omega}, combining resonance effects around {\omega} = 2{\Omega} with glassy power laws at larger {\omega}.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04693 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Odd elasticity in disordered chiral active materials

    cond-mat.soft 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A minimal model shows that local active torques in a disordered elastic solid produce odd elasticity, and coupling to a spinning fluid can enable wave propagation even in overdamped materials.

  2. Elastodynamics from Eulerian Poisson-bracket formalism: application to chiral odd solids

    cond-mat.soft 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An Eulerian Poisson-bracket formulation for solids generates nonlinear terms absent in the Lagrangian frame and reproduces the odd elastic modulus of chiral active solids.

  3. Curved Odd Elasticity

    cond-mat.soft 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Curved surfaces pattern energy injection, open a finite-size spectral gap, and create thresholdless defect-bound and Rayleigh-edge oscillations in odd elastic solids.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, A. M. Kosevich, and L. P. Pitaevskii,Theory of elasticity: volume 7, Vol. 7 (Else- vier, 1986)

    1986

  2. [2]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Fluid Mechanics: Lan- dau and Lifshitz: Course of Theoretical Physics, Volume 6, Vol. 6 (Elsevier, 2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    P. M. Chaikin, T. C. Lubensky, and T. A. Witten,Prin- ciples of condensed matter physics, Vol. 10 (Cambridge university press Cambridge, 1995)

    1995

  4. [4]

    Christensen,Theory of viscoelasticity: an introduction (Elsevier, 2012)

    R. Christensen,Theory of viscoelasticity: an introduction (Elsevier, 2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    T. A. Waigh, Microrheology of complex fluids, Reports on progress in physics68, 685 (2005)

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Wu and Z

    J. Wu and Z. Li, Density-functional theory for complex fluids, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.58, 85 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    J. M. Krishnan, A. P. Deshpande, and P. S. Kumar,Rhe- ology of complex fluids(Springer, 2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    H. A. Barnes, J. F. Hutton, and K. Walters,An intro- duction to rheology, Vol. 3 (Elsevier, 1989)

    work page 1989

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    Sch¨ otz, M

    E.-M. Sch¨ otz, M. Lanio, J. A. Talbot, and M. L. Manning, Glassy dynamics in three- dimensional embryonic tissues, Journal of The Royal Society Interface10, 20130726 (2013), https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsif.2013.0726

    2013

  2. [10]

    Matoz-Fernandez, K

    D. Matoz-Fernandez, K. Martens, R. Sknepnek, J. Bar- rat, and S. Henkes, Cell division and death inhibit glassy behaviour of confluent tissues, Soft matter13, 3205 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Schramma, C

    N. Schramma, C. P. Isra¨ els, and M. Jalaal, Chloro- plasts in plant cells show active glassy behavior under low-light conditions, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences120, e2216497120 (2023), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2216497120

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    L. M. Janssen, Active glasses, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter31, 503002 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Mandal and P

    R. Mandal and P. Sollich, Multiple types of aging in ac- tive glasses, Physical Review Letters125, 218001 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Szumera, I

    M. Szumera, I. Wac lawska, W. Mozgawa, and M. Sitarz, Spectroscopic study of biologically active glasses, Journal of molecular structure744, 609 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    Yoshida, H

    M. Yoshida, H. Mizuno, and A. Ikeda, Structural fluctu- ations in active glasses, Soft Matter20, 7678 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    K. Paul, A. Mutneja, S. K. Nandi, and S. Karmakar, Dy- namical heterogeneity in active glasses is inherently dif- ferent from its equilibrium behavior, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2217073120 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Ghosh, P

    T. Ghosh, P. Sollich, and S. K. Nandi, An elastoplas- tic model approach for the relaxation dynamics of active glasses, Soft Matter (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Mandal and P

    R. Mandal and P. Sollich, Shear-induced orientational ordering in an active glass former, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2101964118 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    V. E. Debets, H. L¨ owen, and L. M. Janssen, Glassy dynamics in chiral fluids, Physical Review Letters130, 058201 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. 6 Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Reviews of modern physics 85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu

    S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.1, 323 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    J¨ ulicher, S

    F. J¨ ulicher, S. W. Grill, and G. Salbreux, Hydrodynamic theory of active matter, Reports on Progress in Physics 81, 076601 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    B¨ ar, R

    M. B¨ ar, R. Großmann, S. Heidenreich, and F. Peruani, Self-propelled rods: Insights and perspectives for active matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 441 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Fatemi, H

    H. Fatemi, H. Khalilian, J. Sarabadani, and M. R. Shae- bani, Optimal chirality enhances long-range fluctuation- induced interactions in active fluids, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08973 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Liebchen and D

    B. Liebchen and D. Levis, Collective behavior of chiral active matter: Pattern formation and enhanced flocking, Physical review letters119, 058002 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Avron, Odd viscosity, Journal of statistical physics92, 543 (1998)

    J. Avron, Odd viscosity, Journal of statistical physics92, 543 (1998)

    1998

  19. [27]

    Banerjee, A

    D. Banerjee, A. Souslov, A. G. Abanov, and V. Vitelli, Odd viscosity in chiral active fluids, Nature communica- tions8, 1573 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Banerjee, V

    D. Banerjee, V. Vitelli, F. J¨ ulicher, and P. Sur´ owka, Ac- tive viscoelasticity of odd materials, Physical Review Let- ters126, 138001 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Fruchart, C

    M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, and V. Vitelli, Odd viscosity and odd elasticity, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 471 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Sur´ owka, A

    P. Sur´ owka, A. Souslov, F. J¨ ulicher, and D. Banerjee, Odd cosserat elasticity in active materials, Phys. Rev. E 108, 064609 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Scheibner, A

    C. Scheibner, A. Souslov, D. Banerjee, P. Sur´ owka, W. T. Irvine, and V. Vitelli, Odd elasticity, Nature Physics16, 475 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Banerjee, A

    D. Banerjee, A. Souslov, and V. Vitelli, Hydrodynamic correlation functions of chiral active fluids, Physical Re- view Fluids7, 043301 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Souslov, K

    A. Souslov, K. Dasbiswas, M. Fruchart, S. Vaikun- tanathan, and V. Vitelli, Topological waves in fluids with odd viscosity, Physical review letters122, 128001 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Duclut, S

    C. Duclut, S. Bo, R. Lier, J. Armas, P. Sur´ owka, and F. J¨ ulicher, Probe particles in odd active viscoelastic flu- ids: How activity and dissipation determine linear sta- bility, Physical Review E109, 044126 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    R. Lier, C. Duclut, S. Bo, J. Armas, F. J¨ ulicher, and P. Sur´ owka, Lift force in odd compressible fluids, Phys. Rev. E108, L023101 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Ostoja-Starzewski and P

    M. Ostoja-Starzewski and P. Sur´ owka, Generalizing odd elasticity theory to odd thermoelasticity for planar ma- terials, Phys. Rev. B109, 064107 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Ganeshan and A

    S. Ganeshan and A. G. Abanov, Odd viscosity in two- dimensional incompressible fluids, Physical review fluids 2, 094101 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Samanta, Role of odd viscosity in falling viscous fluid, Journal of Fluid Mechanics938, A9 (2022)

    A. Samanta, Role of odd viscosity in falling viscous fluid, Journal of Fluid Mechanics938, A9 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Markovich and T

    T. Markovich and T. C. Lubensky, Odd viscosity in ac- tive matter: microscopic origin and 3d effects, Physical Review Letters127, 048001 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. Reichhardt, Active rheology in odd-viscosity systems, Europhysics Letters137, 66004 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Yuan and M

    H. Yuan and M. Olvera de la Cruz, Stokesian dynam- ics with odd viscosity, Physical Review Fluids8, 054101 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Markovich and T

    T. Markovich and T. C. Lubensky, Nonreciprocity and odd viscosity in chiral active fluids, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2219385121 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Braverman, C

    L. Braverman, C. Scheibner, B. VanSaders, and V. Vitelli, Topological defects in solids with odd elas- ticity, Physical Review Letters127, 268001 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Ishimoto, C

    K. Ishimoto, C. Moreau, and K. Yasuda, Self-organized swimming with odd elasticity, Physical Review E105, 064603 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Fossati, C

    M. Fossati, C. Scheibner, M. Fruchart, and V. Vitelli, Odd elasticity and topological waves in active surfaces, Physical Review E109, 024608 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    S. Kole, G. P. Alexander, S. Ramaswamy, and A. Maitra, Layered chiral active matter: Beyond odd elasticity, Physical Review Letters126, 248001 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Huang, R

    R. Huang, R. Mandal, C. Scheibner, and V. Vitelli, Odd elasticity in driven granular matter (2023), arXiv:2311.18720

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    V. Soni, E. S. Bililign, S. Magkiriadou, S. Sacanna, D. Bartolo, M. J. Shelley, and W. T. Irvine, The odd free surface flows of a colloidal chiral fluid, Nature physics15, 1188 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Hargus, F

    C. Hargus, F. Ghimenti, J. Tailleur, and F. van Wijland, Odd dynamics of passive objects in a chiral active bath, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20689 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    C.-T. Lee, T. Lubensky, and T. Markovich, Odd elasticity in disordered chiral active materials (2025), arXiv:2508.04468 [cond-mat.soft]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Sollich, F

    P. Sollich, F. Lequeux, P. H´ ebraud, and M. E. Cates, Rheology of soft glassy materials, Physical review letters 78, 2020 (1997)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Sollich, Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials, Physical Review E58, 738 (1998)

    P. Sollich, Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials, Physical Review E58, 738 (1998)

    1998

  45. [53]

    Cates and P

    M. Cates and P. Sollich, Tensorial constitutive models for disordered foams, dense emulsions, and other soft noner- godic materials, Journal of Rheology48, 193 (2004)

    2004

  46. [54]

    Bouchaud, Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems, Journal de Physique I2, 1705 (1992)

    J.-P. Bouchaud, Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems, Journal de Physique I2, 1705 (1992)

    1992

  47. [55]

    Bouchaud and D

    J.-P. Bouchaud and D. S. Dean, Aging on parisi’s tree, Journal de Physique I5, 265 (1995)

    1995

  48. [56]

    Sollich, Soft glassy rheology, inMolecular Gels: Ma- terials with Self-Assembled Fibrillar Networks(Springer,

    P. Sollich, Soft glassy rheology, inMolecular Gels: Ma- terials with Self-Assembled Fibrillar Networks(Springer,

  49. [57]

    D. Bonn, P. Coussot, H. Huynh, F. Bertrand, and G. Debr´ egeas, Rheology of soft glassy materials, Euro- physics Letters59, 786 (2002)

    2002

  50. [58]

    Sollich and M

    P. Sollich and M. E. Cates, Thermodynamic interpreta- tion of soft glassy rheology models, Physical Review E 85, 031127 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    Divoux, V

    T. Divoux, V. Grenard, and S. Manneville, Rheological hysteresis in soft glassy materials, Physical review letters 110, 018304 (2013)

    2013

  52. [60]

    S. M. Fielding, Shear banding in soft glassy materials, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 102601 (2014)

    2014

  53. [61]

    Voigtmann, Nonlinear glassy rheology, Current opin- ion in colloid & interface science19, 549 (2014)

    T. Voigtmann, Nonlinear glassy rheology, Current opin- ion in colloid & interface science19, 549 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    Nicolas, E

    A. Nicolas, E. E. Ferrero, K. Martens, and J.-L. Barrat, Deformation and flow of amorphous solids: Insights from elastoplastic models, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 045006 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    S. M. Fielding, Elastoviscoplastic rheology and aging in a simplified soft glassy constitutive model, Journal of Rhe- 7 ology64, 723 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    J. D. Eshelby, The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems, Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series A. Mathematical and physical sciences241, 376 (1957)

    1957

  57. [65]

    J. D. Eshelby, The elastic field outside an ellipsoidal inclusion, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences252, 561 (1959)

    1959

  58. [66]

    Markenscoff, On the shape of the eshelby inclusions, Journal of elasticity49, 163 (1997)

    X. Markenscoff, On the shape of the eshelby inclusions, Journal of elasticity49, 163 (1997)

    1997

  59. [67]

    Picard, A

    G. Picard, A. Ajdari, F. Lequeux, and L. Bocquet, Elastic consequences of a single plastic event: A step towards the microscopic modeling of the flow of yield stress fluids, The European Physical Journal E15, 371 (2004)

    2004

  60. [68]

    Y. Fily, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, Cooperative self-propulsion of active and passive rotors, Soft Matter 8, 3002 (2012)

    2012

  61. [69]

    Leoni and T

    M. Leoni and T. Liverpool, Dynamics and interactions of active rotors, Europhysics Letters92, 64004 (2011)

    2011

  62. [70]

    B. C. Van Zuiden, J. Paulose, W. T. Irvine, D. Bartolo, and V. Vitelli, Spatiotemporal order and emergent edge currents in active spinner materials, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences113, 12919 (2016)

    2016

  63. [71]

    Banerjee and P

    D. Banerjee and P. Sollich, Supplementary material: Emergent odd viscoelasticity in chiral soft glassy mate- rial, See below after bibliography (2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    The steady (ω→0) shear viscosity from the inclusion stresses has the same scaling but is subleading compared to the matrix viscosity, which as in conventional SGR actually diverges for 1<X<2

  65. [73]

    The plateau appears in the real part of the viscosity as expected; the imaginary part is smaller by a factor∼ ω/Ω [71]

  66. [74]

    R. H. Ewoldt, A. Hosoi, and G. H. McKinley, New mea- sures for characterizing nonlinear viscoelasticity in large amplitude oscillatory shear, Journal of Rheology52, 1427 (2008)

    2008

  67. [75]

    J. T. Parley, S. Sastry, and P. Sollich, Mean-field theory of yielding under oscillatory shear, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 198001 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    Radhakrishnan and S

    R. Radhakrishnan and S. M. Fielding, Shear banding of soft glassy materials in large amplitude oscillatory shear, Physical review letters117, 188001 (2016)

    2016

  69. [77]

    Radhakrishnan and S

    R. Radhakrishnan and S. M. Fielding, Shear banding in large amplitude oscillatory shear (laostrain and laostress) of soft glassy materials, Journal of Rheology62, 559 (2018)

    2018

  70. [78]

    R. N. Compton and R. M. Pagni, The chirality of biomolecules, inAdvances in atomic, molecular, and op- tical physics, Vol. 48 (Elsevier, 2002) pp. 219–261

    2002

  71. [79]

    H. Lama, M. J. Yamamoto, Y. Furuta, T. Shimaya, and K. A. Takeuchi, Emergence of bacterial glass, PNAS nexus3, page238 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    Huang, A

    Z.-F. Huang, A. M. Menzel, and H. L¨ owen, Dynamical crystallites of active chiral particles, Physical Review Let- ters125, 218002 (2020)

    2020

  73. [81]

    F¨ urthauer, M

    S. F¨ urthauer, M. Strempel, S. W. Grill, and F. J¨ ulicher, Active chiral fluids, The European physical journal E35, 89 (2012)

    2012

  74. [82]

    frustration

    S. F¨ urthauer, M. Strempel, S. W. Grill, and F. J¨ ulicher, Active chiral processes in thin films, Physical review let- ters110, 048103 (2013). I. ELASTIC DESCRIPTION OF MESOSCOPIC ELEMENTS We give here details of the properties of the mesoscopic elements in chiral SGR, in a ...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.